Annex 9 Referred to in Chapter 10 Government Procurement Part 1
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority M O C
Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority m o c . e b o d a . k c Sustainable Governance o t s - e g Indicators 2020 e v © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2020 | 2 Independent Supervisory Bodies Indicator Audit Office Question Does there exist an independent and effective audit office? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = There exists an effective and independent audit office. 8-6 = There exists an effective and independent audit office, but its role is slightly limited. 5-3 = There exists an independent audit office, but its role is considerably limited. 2-1 = There does not exist an independent and effective audit office. Australia Score 10 Under the Auditor-General Act 1997, the auditor-general is responsible for providing auditing services to parliament and other public sector entities. The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) supports the auditor-general, who is an independent officer of parliament. The ANAO’s purpose is to provide parliament with an independent assessment of selected areas of the public administration, and to provide assurance regarding public sector financial reporting, administration and accountability. This task is undertaken primarily by conducting performance and financial statement audits. Citation: https://www.anao.gov.au/about/auditor-general-and-office https://www.aph.gov.au/~/~/link.aspx?_id=387AD00794BD41C39579392068D56CF9&_z=z Austria Score 10 The Austrian Court of Audit (Rechnungshof) is an instrument of parliament. The office reports regularly to parliament, and parliament can order it to perform specific tasks. -
CANON INC. (Exact Name of the Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM SD SPECIALIZED DISCLOSURE REPORT CANON INC. (Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter) JAPAN 001-15122 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) File Number) Identification No.) 30-2, Shimomaruko 3-chome , Ohta-ku, Tokyo 146-8501, Japan (Address of principle executive offices) (Zip code) Eiji Shimizu, +81-3-3758-2111, 30-2, Shimomaruko 3-chome, Ohta-ku, Tokyo 146-8501, Japan (Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.) Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed and provide the period to which the information in this form applies: Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure Established in 1937, Canon Inc. is a Japanese corporation with its headquarters in Tokyo, Japan. Canon Inc. is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of office multifunction devices (“MFDs”), plain paper copying machines, laser printers, inkjet printers, cameras, diagnostic equipment and lithography equipment. Canon Inc. earns revenues primarily from the manufacture and sale of these products domestically and internationally. Canon Inc. and its consolidated companies fully have been aware of conflict minerals issue and have been working together with business partners and industry entities to address the issue of conflict minerals. In response to Rule 13p-1, Canon Inc. conducted Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry and due diligence based on the “OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas,” for its various products. -
Places of Employment of Graduates from Faculty/Graduate School (Master's Program) (FY2015)
Places of Employment of Graduates from Faculty/Graduate School (Master's Program) (FY2015) Faculty of Letters/Graduate School of Humanities ● Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. ● Nippon Life Insurance Co. ● Osaka Customs ● Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, Ltd. ● Teacher (JH&HS) ● Kobe Customs ● The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. ● Hyogo Prefectural High School ● Kobe City Office ● Bank of Japan ● Osaka Regional Taxation Bureau ● Toyonaka City Office ● Japan Post Bank Co., Ltd. ● Japan MINT ● Hiroshima Home Television Co.,Ltd. ● Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. ● Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology ● Japan Broadcasting Corporation ● Daiwa Securities Co., Ltd. ● Osaka Public Prosecutors Office ● Kobe Steel,Ltd. ● Japan Post Insurance Co.,Ltd. ● Kobe District Court ● Mitsubishi Electric Corp. Faculty of Intercultural Studies/Graduate School of Intercultural Studies ● Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan ● Nippon Life Insurance Company ● Toyota Motor Corp. ● Osaka Immigration Bureau ● SUMITOMO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ● KANEKA CORPORATION ● Kansai Bureau of Economy ● Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. ● Mitsubishi Electric Corp. ● Tokyo Metropolitan Government ● Resona Bank, Ltd. ● New Kansai International Airport Co., Ltd. ● Kobe City Office ● Mizuho Bank, Ltd. ● Daiwa Institute of Research Ltd. ● Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Art ● The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. ● TAISEI CORPORATION ● Kansai Telecasting Corporation ● Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc. ● Kobe Steel,Ltd. ● Japan Broadcasting Corp. ● THE KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER Co., INC. ● Hitachi, Ltd. Faculty of Human Development/Graduate School of Human Development and Environment ● Suntory Holdings Ltd. ● Mitsubishi Corp. ● Hyogo Prefectural High school ● ASICS Corp. ● Mizuho Bank, Ltd. ● Osaka Prefectural High school ● Kobe Steel,Ltd. ● The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. ● Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare ● Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. -
J-PARC MLF MUSE Muon Beams
For Project X muSR forum at Fermilab Oct 17th-19th,2012 J-PARC MLF MUSE muon beams J-PARC MLF Muon Section/KEK IMSS Yasuhiro Miyake N D-Line In operation N U-Line Commissioning started! N S-Line Partially constructed! N H-Line Partially constructed! Proton Beam Transport from 3GeV RCS to MLF� On the way, towards neutron source� Graphite Muon Target! G-2, DeeMe Mu-Hf Super Highexperiments Resolution Powder etc. H-LineDiffractometer (SHRPD) – KEK are planned 100 m LineBL8� NOBORU - IBARAKI Biological S-Line JAEA BL4� Crystal Diffractometer Nuclear Data - Hokkaido Univ. High Resolution Chopper 4d Space Access Neutron Spectrometer Spectrometer(4SEASONS) Muon Target Grant - in - Aid for Specially Promoted Research, MEXT, Neutron Target U-Line HI - SANS Versatile High Intensity (JAEA) Total Diffractometer(KEK /NEDO) D-Line&9&$3/-&3&1 (KEK) Cold Neutron Double Chopper Spectrometer IBARAKI Materials Design (CNDCS) - JAEA Diffractometer 30 m Muon Engineering Materials and Life Science Facility (MLF) for Muon & NeutronDiffractometer - JAEA Edge-cooling Rotating Graphite Graphite Fixed Target Target From January 2014! At Present! Will be changed in Summer 2013! Inves�gated during shut-‐down! Fixed Target Rota�ng Target S-Line H-Line Surface µ+(30 MeV/c) Surface µ+ For HF, g-2 exp. For material sciences e- up to 120 MeV/c For DeeMe µ- up to 120 MeV/c For µCF Muon Target U-Line D-Line Ultra Slow µ+(0.05-30keV) Surface µ+(30 MeV/c) For multi-layered thin Decay µ+/µ-(up to 120 MeV/c) foils, nano-materials, catalysis, etc Users’ RUN, in Operation MUSE D-Line, since Sep., 2008 [The world-most intense pulsed muon beam achieved at J-PARC MUSE] ZZZAt the J-PARC Muon Facility (MUSE), the intensity of the pulsed surface muon beam was recorded to be 1.8 x 106/s on November 2009, which was produced by a primary proton beam at a corresponding power of 120 kW delivered from the Rapid Cycle Synchrotron (RCS). -
FROM KEK-PS to J-PARC Yoshishige Yamazaki, J-PARC, KEK & JAEA, Japan
FROM KEK-PS TO J-PARC Yoshishige Yamazaki, J-PARC, KEK & JAEA, Japan Abstract target are located in series. Every 3 s or so, depending The user experiments at J-PARC have just started. upon the usage of the main ring (MR), the beam is JPARC, which stands for Japan Proton Accelerator extracted from the RCS to be injected to the MR. Here, it Research Complex, comprises a 400-MeV linac (at is ramped up to 30 GeV at present and slowly extracted to present: 180 MeV, being upgraded), a 3-GeV rapid- Hadron Experimental Hall, where the kaon-production cycling synchrotron (RCS), and a 50-GeV main ring target is located. The experiments using the kaons are (MR) synchrotron, which is now in operation at 30 GeV. conducted there. Sometimes, it is fast extracted to The RCS will provide the muon-production target and the produce the neutrinos, which are sent to the Super spallation-neutron-production target with a beam power Kamiokande detector, which is located 295-km west of of 1 MW (at present: 120 kW) at a repetition rate of 25 the J-PARC site. In the future, we are conceiving the Hz. The muons and neutrons thus generated will be used possibility of constructing a test facility for an in materials science, life science, and others, including accelerator-driven nuclear waste transmutation system, industrial applications. The beams that are fast extracted which was shifted to Phase II. We are trying every effort from the MR generate neutrinos to be sent to the Super to get funding for this facility. -
Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan
Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Office of FDI Promotion, Cabinet Office Program for Promoting Japan as an １ Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Growth of foreign direct investment to Japan In December 2011, the Government of Japan formulated the “Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan” consisting of policy measures to create an attractive, world-class business and living environment. The “New Growth Strategy” (June 2010, Cabinet decision) and the “Interim Report on Strategies to Revitalize Japan” (August 2011, Cabinet decision) requested the Government to formulate this Program. The Program was determined by the Interagency Parliamentary Secretary Meeting chaired by Hiroshi Ogushi, Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet Office. ＜1st stage＞ ＜2nd stage＞ Doubling FDI stock Doubling FDI to GDP from 2001 to 2006 ratio to around 5% by 2010 ２ Three Targets of The Program The Program sets out three targets that are to be achieved by 2020. 1) To Increase the Number of High Value-Added Sites The aim is to increase the number of high value-added sites (Asia Regional Headquarters and research and development facilities) by 30 sites each year by attracting FDI. As of the end of FY2009, there were approximately 500 high value-added sites in Japan. 2) To Double the Number of Employees of Foreign Enterprises The aim is to increase the number of employees of foreign enterprises (defined as those which have more than one-third ratio of foreign ownership) to 2,000,000 by FY2020. -
The National Administrative Organization in Japan
Appendix 2 THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN 1. The Outline of National Administrative Organization National administration is uniformly carried out by the Cabinet and the organizations under the cabinet. The Cabinet, Ministries, Agencies and Incorporated Administrative Agencies (IAAs), etc. function as one organization, at the top of which exists the Cabinet. It is responsible for all the activities of State except legislative and judicial ones. Consequently it is natural that these organizations which take care of national administration should be systematically organized under the Cabinet. As of 2019, the Cabinet Office, 11 Ministries, and the Reconstruction Agency are under the Cabinet. They are national administrative organizations in the proper sense of terms. However, not all the areas of State activities are covered by these Ministries. Incorporated Administrative Agencies and Public Corporations also cover other parts of the activities. One of their purposes is accomplishing enough efficiency and effectiveness in their business with autonomy and legal personalities separated from State.To necessary extent, they are subject to various controls by their competent Ministers. The former, for which more general rules are prepared, amount 87 as of October 1, 2019. Some of them are regarded the same as government offices in terms of quality of their roles, to which are applied statutes concerned. Public Corporations, which now amount 33 as of the same date, are enterprises dealing with different quality business from IAAs. They must be regulated by individual acts of rules, not common rules, unlike IAAs. Thus we can see some types of organizations following policy process from planning to implementation. -
Japanese Business Concepts You Should Know
1 Japanese Business Concepts You Should Know Edited by Parissa Haghirian Sophia University Tokyo, Japan 2 Contents About this Book ......................................................................................... 4 The Editor ................................................................................................ 5 Japanese Business Concepts You Should Know ................................................. 6 Contributors of This Book ............................................................................ 94 Bibliography ............................................................................................ 96 Further Reading on Japanese Management .................................................... 102 3 About this Book This book is the result of one of my “Management in Japan” classes held at the Faculty of Liberal Arts at Sophia University in Tokyo. Students wrote this dictionary entries, I edited and updated them. The document is now available as a free e-book at my homepage www.haghirian.com. We hope that this book improves understanding of Japanese management and serves as inspiration for anyone interested in the subject. Questions and comments can be sent to [email protected]. Please inform the editor if you plan to quote parts of the book. Japanese Business Concepts You Should Know Edited by Parissa Haghirian First edition, Tokyo, October 2019 4 The Editor Parissa Haghirian is Professor of International Management at Sophia University in Tokyo. She lives and works in Japan since 2004 -
Urban China China
URBAN CHINA URBAN URBAN CHINA CHINA TOWARD EFFICIENT, CITIES AND SUSTAINABLE INCLUSIVE, INCLUSIVE, AND TOWARD EFFICIENT, SUSTAINABLE URBANIZATION INCLUSIVE, AND BUILDING EFFICIENT, BUILDING EFFICIENT, SUSTAINABLE URBANIZATION The World Bank Development Research Center of the State Council, The People’s Republic of China ISBN 978-1-4648-0206-5 90000 9781464 802065 SKU 210206 Urban China Urban China Toward Efficient, Inclusive, and Sustainable Urbanization The World Bank Development Research Center of the State Council, the People’s Republic of China Washington, DC © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank and the Development Research Center of the State Council, P. R. China 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 17 16 15 14 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank and the Development Research Center of the State Council, P.R. China. Note that neither The World Bank nor the Development Research Center of the State Council, P. R. China necessarily own each component of the content included in the work. The World Bank and the Development Research Center of the State Council, P. R. China therefore do not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of nor imply an official endorsement by The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, the governments they represent, or the Government of China. -
Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground Between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model
UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v5803kw Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 30(1) Author Aronson, Bruce E. Publication Date 2012 DOI 10.5070/P8301022242 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE OLYMPUS SCANDAL AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM: CAN JAPAN FIND A MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN THE BOARD MONITORING MODEL AND MANAGEMENT MODEL? By Bruce E. Aronson* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................. 95 II. The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Issues ..................................... 106 A. Background of the Olympus Case ............ 106 B. Monitoring of Management under Japan's Corporate Governance System .............. 115 III. Back to Basics: Revisiting Theoretical and Structural Issues ............................ 120 A. Purpose of Corporate Governance Reform .... 120 B. Monitoring Function of the Board of Directors..... ........................ 125 IV. Practical Issues: Achieving "Truly Effective" Corporate Governance Reform ................. 129 A. Information ............................. 130 1. Internal Sharing of Information .......... 130 2. Public Information Disclosure ............ 132 * Senior Fulbright Research Scholar, Waseda University; Professor of Law, Creighton University School of Law. I thank Mr. Sumitaka Fujita, Professor Yumiko Miwa, and Mr. Naoaki Okabe for acting as a panel of commentators following my presentation on this research at the Meiji Institute for Global Affairs Inaugural Symposium, Tokyo, Japan (Feb. 21, 2012), and participants in presentations at Nagoya University (April 20, 2012), AIMA Japan Hedge Fund Forum 2012, Tokyo Stock Exchange (June 4, 2012), 2012 International Conference on Law & Society, Law & Society Association, Honolulu (June 5, 2012), and Business Research Institute, Tokyo (Aug. -
A Guide to Japan's Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space
A Guide to Japan’s Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space A Working Paper on Japan’s Space Policy By Takuya Wakimoto ISSUES & INSIGHTS WORKING PAPER VOL. 19, WP3 | APRIL 2019 Pacific Forum Based in Honolulu, the Pacific Forum (www.pacforum.org) is a foreign policy research institute focused on the Asia-Pacific Region. Founded in 1975, the Pacific Forum collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to global leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic, and maritime policy issues, and works to help stimulate cooperative policies through rigorous research, analyses and dialogues. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................... vi ENGLISH-JAPANESE TRANSLATIONS ...................................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. KEY GOVERNMENTAL ACTORS, POLICY DOCUMENTS AND MECHANISMS ........................................................................ 3 3. JAPAN’S SPACE POLICY OBJECTIVE ......................................... 23 4. CONCLUSION ......................................................................... -
Expert Voices on Japan Security, Economic, Social, and Foreign Policy Recommendations
Expert Voices on Japan Security, Economic, Social, and Foreign Policy Recommendations U.S.-Japan Network for the Future Cohort IV Expert Voices on Japan Security, Economic, Social, and Foreign Policy Recommendations U.S.-Japan Network for the Future Cohort IV Arthur Alexander, Editor www.mansfieldfdn.org The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation, Washington, D.C. ©2018 by The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation All rights reserved. Published in the United States of America Library of Congress Control Number: 2018942756 The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation or its funders. Contributors Amy Catalinac, Assistant Professor, New York University Yulia Frumer, Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins University Robert Hoppens, Associate Professor, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Nori Katagiri, Assistant Professor, Saint Louis University Adam P. Liff, Assistant Professor, Indiana University Ko Maeda, Associate Professor, University of North Texas Reo Matsuzaki, Assistant Professor, Trinity College Matthew Poggi Michael Orlando Sharpe, Associate Professor, City University of New York Jolyon Thomas, Assistant Professor, University of Pennsylvania Kristin Vekasi, Assistant Professor, University of Maine Joshua W. Walker, Managing Director for Japan and Head of Global Strategic Initiatives, Office of the President, Eurasia Group U.S.-Japan Network for the Future Advisory Committee Dr. Susan J. Pharr, Edwin O. Reischauer Professor