DOCSLIB.ORG

(WT/Let/1458) ANNEX 1 Central Government Entities Which Procure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(WT/Let/1458) ANNEX 1 Central Government Entities Which Procure APPENDIX I JAPAN ANNEX 1 Page 1/3 ANNEX 1 Central Government Entities which Procure in Accordance with the Provisions of this Agreement Supplies - Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Threshold: - Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry 130 thousand SDR - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism List of Entities: - Ministry of the Environment - Ministry of Defense All entities covered by the Accounts Law as follows: Services - House of Representatives Threshold: - House of Councillors - Supreme Court Construction services: 4,500 thousand SDR - Board of Audit - Cabinet Architectural, engineering and other technical - National Personnel Authority services covered by this Agreement: - Cabinet Office 450 thousand SDR - Reconstruction Agency - Imperial Household Agency Other services: 130 thousand SDR - Japan Fair Trade Commission - National Public Safety Commission List of Entities which procure the services, (National Police Agency) specified in Annex 4: - Personal Information Protection Commission All entities covered by the Accounts Law as - Japan Casino Regulatory follows: Commission - Financial Services Agency - House of Representatives - Consumer Affairs Agency - House of Councillors - Ministry of Internal Affairs and - Supreme Court Communications - Board of Audit - Ministry of Justice - Cabinet - Ministry of Foreign Affairs - National Personnel Authority - Ministry of Finance - Cabinet Office - Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, - Reconstruction Agency Science and Technology - Imperial Household Agency - Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare - Japan Fair Trade Commission - National Public Safety Commission (National Police Agency) 22 December 2019 (WT/Let/1458) APPENDIX I JAPAN ANNEX 1 Page 2/3 Services (cont'd) FSC Description - Personal Information Protection 22 Railway Equipment Commission 24 Tractors - Japan Casino Regulatory 32 Woodworking Machinery and Commission Equipment - Financial Services Agency 34 Metalworking Machinery - Consumer Affairs Agency 35 Service and Trade Equipment - Ministry of Internal Affairs and 36 Special Industry Machinery Communications 37 Agricultural Machinery and - Ministry of Justice Equipment - Ministry of Foreign Affairs 38 Construction, Mining, Excavating, and - Ministry of Finance Highway Maintenance Equipment - Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, 39 Materials Handling Equipment Science and Technology 40 Rope, Cable, Chain, and Fittings - Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 41 Refrigeration, Air Conditioning, and - Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Air Circulating Equipment Fisheries 43 Pumps and Compressors - Ministry of Economy, Trade and 45 Plumbing, Heating and Sanitation Industry Equipment - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, 46 Water Purification and Sewage Transport and Tourism Treatment Equipment - Ministry of the Environment 47 Pipe, Tubing, Hose, and Fittings - Ministry of Defense 48 Valves 51 Hand Tools Notes to Annex 1 52 Measuring Tools 55 Lumber, Millwork, Plywood and 1. Entities covered by the Accounts Law Veneer include all their internal sub-divisions, 61 Electric Wire, and Power and independent organs, attached organizations Distribution Equipment and other organizations and local branch 62 Lighting Fixtures and Lamps offices provided for in the National 65 Medical, Dental, and Veterinary Government Organization Law and the Law Equipment and Supplies establishing the Cabinet Office. 6630 Chemical Analysis Instruments 6635 Physical Properties Testing 2. Products and services procured with a Equipment view to resale or with a view to use in the 6640 Laboratory Equipment and Supplies production of goods for sale are not included. 6645 Time Measuring Instruments 6650 Optical Instruments 6655 Geophysical and Astronomical 3. This Agreement shall not apply to Instruments contracts to be awarded to co-operatives or associations in accordance with laws and regulations existing at the time of the entry into force of this Agreement for Japan. 4. This Agreement will generally apply to procurement by the Ministry of Defense of the following Federal Supply Classification (FSC) categories subject to the Japanese Government determinations under the provisions of Article XXIII, paragraph 1: __________ 22 December 2019 (WT/Let/1458) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan
    Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Office of FDI Promotion, Cabinet Office Program for Promoting Japan as an １ Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Growth of foreign direct investment to Japan In December 2011, the Government of Japan formulated the “Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan” consisting of policy measures to create an attractive, world-class business and living environment. The “New Growth Strategy” (June 2010, Cabinet decision) and the “Interim Report on Strategies to Revitalize Japan” (August 2011, Cabinet decision) requested the Government to formulate this Program. The Program was determined by the Interagency Parliamentary Secretary Meeting chaired by Hiroshi Ogushi, Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet Office. ＜1st stage＞ ＜2nd stage＞ Doubling FDI stock Doubling FDI to GDP from 2001 to 2006 ratio to around 5% by 2010 ２ Three Targets of The Program The Program sets out three targets that are to be achieved by 2020. 1) To Increase the Number of High Value-Added Sites The aim is to increase the number of high value-added sites (Asia Regional Headquarters and research and development facilities) by 30 sites each year by attracting FDI. As of the end of FY2009, there were approximately 500 high value-added sites in Japan. 2) To Double the Number of Employees of Foreign Enterprises The aim is to increase the number of employees of foreign enterprises (defined as those which have more than one-third ratio of foreign ownership) to 2,000,000 by FY2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Administrative Organization in Japan
    Appendix 2 THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN 1. The Outline of National Administrative Organization National administration is uniformly carried out by the Cabinet and the organizations under the cabinet. The Cabinet, Ministries, Agencies and Incorporated Administrative Agencies (IAAs), etc. function as one organization, at the top of which exists the Cabinet. It is responsible for all the activities of State except legislative and judicial ones. Consequently it is natural that these organizations which take care of national administration should be systematically organized under the Cabinet. As of 2019, the Cabinet Office, 11 Ministries, and the Reconstruction Agency are under the Cabinet. They are national administrative organizations in the proper sense of terms. However, not all the areas of State activities are covered by these Ministries. Incorporated Administrative Agencies and Public Corporations also cover other parts of the activities. One of their purposes is accomplishing enough efficiency and effectiveness in their business with autonomy and legal personalities separated from State.To necessary extent, they are subject to various controls by their competent Ministers. The former, for which more general rules are prepared, amount 87 as of October 1, 2019. Some of them are regarded the same as government offices in terms of quality of their roles, to which are applied statutes concerned. Public Corporations, which now amount 33 as of the same date, are enterprises dealing with different quality business from IAAs. They must be regulated by individual acts of rules, not common rules, unlike IAAs. Thus we can see some types of organizations following policy process from planning to implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Japan's Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space
    A Guide to Japan’s Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space A Working Paper on Japan’s Space Policy By Takuya Wakimoto ISSUES & INSIGHTS WORKING PAPER VOL. 19, WP3 | APRIL 2019 Pacific Forum Based in Honolulu, the Pacific Forum (www.pacforum.org) is a foreign policy research institute focused on the Asia-Pacific Region. Founded in 1975, the Pacific Forum collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to global leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic, and maritime policy issues, and works to help stimulate cooperative policies through rigorous research, analyses and dialogues. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................... vi ENGLISH-JAPANESE TRANSLATIONS ...................................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. KEY GOVERNMENTAL ACTORS, POLICY DOCUMENTS AND MECHANISMS ........................................................................ 3 3. JAPAN’S SPACE POLICY OBJECTIVE ......................................... 23 4. CONCLUSION .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • Satoshi Kogure, Co-Chair of Multi-GNSS Asia Director, National Space Policy Secretariat, Cabinet Office, the Government of Japan
    MULTI-GNSS ASIA Satoshi Kogure, Co-Chair of Multi-GNSS Asia Director, National Space Policy Secretariat, Cabinet Office, The Government of Japan Supported by: WHAT’S MGA? Multi-GNSS Asia (MGA) which promotes multi GNSS in the Asia and Oceania regions and encourages GNSS service providers and user communities to develop new applications and businesses. The MGA activities are reported annually in the ICG providers’ forum. The MGA also supports developing countries in achieving its SDGs through technical support on GNSS via seminars for policy makers and more. Aug. 2020 GISTDA Aug. 2019 GISTDA Oct. 2018 RMIT, FrontierSI, GA, GNSS,asia, QSS Oct. 2017 LAPAN, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA Nov. 2016 Univ. Philippines, NAMRIA, Phivolcs, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA Dec. 2015 Soartech, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Oct. 2014 NSTDA, G-NAVIS, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Dec. 2013 G-NAVIS, HUST, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Dec. 2012 ANGKASA, JAXA, G-NAVIS, SPAC Nov. 2011 GTC, KARI, JAXA, SPAC Nov. 2010 IGNSS, JAXA, SPAC https://www.multignss.asia https://www.multignss.asia/contact Jan. 2010 GISTDA, JAXA, SPAC https://www.facebook.com/multignss Conference and Exhibition What is MGA? To share the latest advancements to the GNSS and PNT landscape, the MGA conference is organized annually in a different location across the Asia- Oceania region. Delegates can also find out about new technologies, products and services, updates on R&D projects and achievements. The Pillars of conference attracts participants from industry, government and academia from around the world, making its networking opportunities second-to- none. Activity Networking and Capacity Building via Webinars, Workshops and Forums To make sure you’re on top of rapidly changing technological developments • Conference and Exhibition in GNSS, PNT technologies and its utilization in the business landscape, MGA hosts webinars, regional workshops and networking forums.
    [Show full text]
  • III. Emergency Responses Required and Taken by Governments and Other Bodies 1
    III. Emergency Responses Required and Taken by Governments and Other Bodies 1. Emergency Responses Mandated in the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Act, the Basic Plan for Emergency Preparedness, etc. See Chapter III 1 of the Interim Report. 2. Government Response after the Accident (1) General description of the response of the national government1 Right after the earthquake struck at 14:46 on March 11, 2011, METI established the Emergency Response Headquarters for the disaster and began gathering information on the state of the reactors at nuclear power stations in the stricken areas. At the Prime Minister’s Office, at 14:50 the same day, Tetsuro Ito, the Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary for Crisis Management (“Crisis Management Deputy Chief Ito”), established the Emergency Response Office in the Prime Minister’s Office for the earthquake, and summoned members of the Emergency Operations Team, which was made up of the bureau chiefs of relevant ministries, to the Prime Minister’s Office Crisis Management Center located below ground inside the Prime Minister’s Office. At around 15:42 the same day, Masao Yoshida, the site superintendent of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station (hereinafter referred to as “Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS) (hereinafter referred to as “Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS Site Superintendent Yoshida”) of Tokyo Electric Power Company (hereinafter referred to as “TEPCO), sent an Article 10 Notification via the TEPCO head office to the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (“NISA”) and other competent bodies, having judged that,
    [Show full text]
  • KAKEHASHI Project Asian American Leadership Program Report
    Japan’s Friendship Ties Program (USA) KAKEHASHI Project Asian American Leadership Program Report １．Program Overview As part of the Exchange Program “KAKEHASHI Project,” 10 Asian Americans visited Japan. They stayed in Japan from October 2 to October 9 to participate in programs aimed at promoting their understanding of Japan with regard to Japanese politics, economy, society, culture, history, and foreign policy. Through the lectures by ministries observation of the historical landmarks, and other experiences of the traditional Japanese cultures, the participants enjoyed a wide range of opportunities to improve their understanding of Japan and shared their individual interests and experiences through SNS. To wrap up the whole program they exchanged opinion with MOFA officers on the contents to dedicate for the future program 【Participating Countries and Number of Participants】 United States of America：10 participants 【Prefectures Visited】 Tokyo, Hiroshima, Kyoto ２．Program Schedule Oct 2 (Sun.) 【Arrival】Arrival at Narita International Airport and Haneda Airport Oct 3 (Mon.) 【Orientation】 【Courtesy Call】Parliamentary Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs Takei 【Lecture】Ministry of Foreign Affairs/Asian and Oceanian Affairs Bureau and North American Affairs Bureau 【Lecture】Cabinet Secretariat/Office of Policy Planning and Coordinator on Territory and Sovereignty Oct 4 (Tue.) 【Local Industry】Tsukiji Market 【Observation】Edo Tokyo Museum ＊Group A:【Lecture】Ministry of Justice/Japanese Regal System/Intellectual Property Law 【Lecture】Cabinet Office/Measures to the Aging Population of Japa ＊Group B:【Lecture 】Reconstruction Agency / Recovery for the Great East Earthquake 1 【Lecture】Cabinet Secretariat / Growth Strategy Oct.5 (Wed.) 【Observation】Diet Building 【Cutting-edge Technology】National Museum of Emerging Science 【Historical Landmark】Meiji Shrine Move to Hiroshima Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics, Politics, Public Policy and Law in Japan, Australasia and the Paci C: Corporate Governance, Financial Crisis, and Consumer Product Safety in 2008
    R. L. R. Economics, Politics, Public Policy and Law in Japan, Australasia and the Paci c: Corporate Governance, Financial Crisis, and Consumer Product Safety in 2008 Luke NOTTAGE＃ 1. Taking the Australia-Japan FTA negotiations to new levels 2. Whaling: What can law add to science, economics, ethics and politics ? 3. Australia also should Rail at Australian’s Tabloid Trash’ about Japan 4. Consumer over-indebtedness in Japan, Australia and the US 5. Dodgy foods and Chinese dumplings in Japan 6. FDI and corporate governance in Japan 7. Investor-state arbitration for Indonesia, Australia and Japan 8. Rivals: China, India and Japan economic, not Olympic ? 9. The politics of Japan’s new Takeovers Guidelines 10. Tables turned in Japanese and US nancial markets 11. Lessons from Japan for the US nancial crisis 12. The nancial crisis and loansharks in Japan and NZ 13. Consequences of melamine-laced milk for China, NZ, Japan and beyond 14. Political dynasties in Japan, the US, Australia . but not NZ ? 15. A New Consumer Agency for Japan ? Appendix: Composition of Japan’s Takeovers Guidelines Study Groups Abstract: This is an updated collection of my own postings on the new East Asia Forum blog.＊ Created primarily by political economists from the Australian National University in mid-2008, the blog is attracting a wide readership and regular contributions from experts interested in or based throughout the rapidly evolving Asia-Paci c region. My starting point involves taking seriously Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s call, just before his ＃ Associate Professor, Sydney Law School ([email protected]); and Co-Director, Australian Network for Japanese Law (ANJeL, www.law.usyd.edu.au/anjel).
    [Show full text]
  • Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from Experiments with Deliberative Policy-Making By
    Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from experiments with deliberative policy-making by Masahiro Matsuura Master in City Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998 B. Eng. Civil Engineering University of Tokyo, 1996 Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban and Regional Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2006 © 2006 Masahiro Matsuura. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of author: Dep artment of Urban Studies and Planning June 27, 2006 Certified by: Lawrence E. Susskind Ford Professor of Urban and Environmental Planning, Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Frank Levy, Daniel Rose Professor of Urban Economics, Chair, Ph.D. Committee 2 Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from experiments with deliberative policy-making by Masahiro Matsuura Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on August 11, 2006 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban and Regional Planning ABSTRACT Can consensus building processes, as practiced in the US, be used to resolve infrastructure disputes in Japan? Since the 1990s, proposals to construct highways, dams, ports and airports, railways, as well as to redevelop neighborhoods, have been opposed by a wide range of stakeholders. In response, there is a growing interest among Japanese practitioners in using consensus building processes, as practiced in the US, in order to resolve infrastructure disputes.
    [Show full text]
  • How Will the DPJ Change Japan? Tobias Harris
    Naval War College Review Volume 63 Article 6 Number 1 Winter 2010 How Will the DPJ Change Japan? Tobias Harris Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Harris, Tobias (2010) "How Will the DPJ Change Japan?," Naval War College Review: Vol. 63 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol63/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Harris: How Will the DPJ Change Japan? 77 HOW WILL THE DPJ CHANGE JAPAN? Tobias Harris y any measure, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) won the 2009 general Belection in a historic landslide. The Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP’s) seat to- tals fell from 219 single-member districts to sixty-four, and seventy-seven propor- tional-representation seats to fifty-five. Komeito, the LDP’s coalition partner, lost 1 ten seats, including all eight of the single-member districts it had won in 2005. The DPJ’s likely coalition partners, the Social Democratic Party of Japan and Peo- ple’s New Party, basically stayed put: the former returned with the same number of seats, while the latter fell one seat, to three. Tobias Harris is an analyst of Japanese politics and for- THE 2009 GENERAL ELECTION eign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Safety Commission of Japan
    FOOD SAFETY COMMISSION OF JAPAN Food Safety Commission of Japan 1 Who We Are 1All foods are not necessarily safe, despite the human have not experienced before. Anisakiasis, parasitic inclination to believe they are. Plants often contain infection, is caused by the consumption of raw sea- different alkaloids such as solanine, a well-known food. Apparently, recent incidence of this foodborne toxic substance contained in the green tubers or disease is a result from people’s new preference for buds of potatoes. Inappropriate consumption of eating food raw, which were not eaten raw before. these plants causes plant poisoning due to these al- FSCJ also conducts risk assessment of such kind. kaloids. Cassava, an important crop in the tropics, is another example of a toxic plant because it contains FSCJ, however, is responsible not solely for assess- a cyanogenic glycoside as a component, and is ment of food safety risks; it is also responsible for highly hazardous if someone eats it without pretreat- “risk communication” through which the information ment. Human beings have been contriving to make on risk assessments is to be provided correctly in an these toxic crops edible for survival throughout our easy-to-understand manner. Through risk communi- long history. Our long fight against pathogenic bac- cation, FSCJ should provide people with the knowl- teria that cause serious foodborne diseases is one edge and wisdom of consuming food safely. of control for our very survival. FSCJ needs to listen to consumer’s questions and Food Safety Commission of Japan (FSCJ) is a risk opinions about food safety and about risk assess- assessment organization for science-based assess- ments through communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights 1St
    Japan’s National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights As part of our commitment to the implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, at the 2016 United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights, the Government of Japan officially announced Japan’s intention to formulate a National Action Plan (NAP) on Business and Human Rights in the coming years. The development of the NAP is significant for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); it is one of the concrete measures listed under Japan’s SDGs Implementation Guiding Principles. In the first stage of the NAP formulation process, the Government of Japan initiated a baseline study to assess to what extent current legislation and initiatives provide for the protection of human rights in the course of business activities. To capture the current landscape, the Government of Japan organized a series of consultations with multi-stakeholders including business associations, trade unions, academia and civil society. 1st multi-stakeholder consultation On March 8, 2018, the Government of Japan organized the first multi-stakeholder consultation on the topic of public procurements. 1. The relevant ministries and government-related entities reported on the current situations and measures regarding public procurement, focusing on Act on Promoting Green Procurement, Act on Priority Procurement Promotion for Persons with Disabilities, Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities, procurement based on Article 20 of Act on Promotion of Female Participation and Career Advancement in the Workplace, and procurement related to development assistance. 2. Subsequently, the Tokyo Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games presented on their Sustainable Sourcing Code, and the stakeholders gave presentations on possible risks faced by companies or workers.
    [Show full text]