DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case for Praxics Robert Epstein Northeastern University and Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Behavior Analyst 1984, 7, 101-1 19 No. 2 (Fall) The Case for Praxics Robert Epstein Northeastern University and Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies Since the early 1 900s a variety of names has been proposed for the scientific study ofbehavior, but none has come into general use. "Praxics," a recent entry, is defensible on several grounds. "Behaviorism," on the other hand, is the name of a school of philosophy. Though praxics has roots in behaviorism, the term "behaviorism" should not be applied to praxics. Confusion between the science and the philosophy has retarded the growth ofthe science immeasurably. Its growth has also been impeded by its association with psychology, which is still primarily the study of mind. Efforts are underway to establish praxics as an independent field. It was not a wholly TERMS satisfactory namefor afield. There have been several attempts to -B. F. Skinner (1979, p. 331), name the study of behavior in general on "the experimental analysis and the experimental analysis of behav- of behavior" ior in particular (Epstein, 1984a). Most ofthese efforts have failed. Two-"ethol- "Praxics"-a blend of "physics" and ogy" and "praxiology"-have been par- "praxis" (irpa&ts), the Greek for "action" tially successful in certain domains. or "behavior"-is a term I and others now use for the experimental analysis of behavior and related disciplines. We de- Ethology fine it as the study of behavior. We call The term "ethology" has two different, one who studies behavior a "praxist," though closely related, modem usages. It after "chemist." In this essay I present was defined by Lorenz and Tinbergen as (a) the case for the use of the terms, (b) the study of instinct (e.g., Tinbergen, the case for drawing a clear distinction 1951). It was a specialty within biology, between praxics and behaviorism, and (c) concerned primarily with innate behav- the case for the separation ofpraxics and ior patterns in non-human animals in the psychology. Most ofthe arguments I will natural habitats. By the 1960s it had make have, it turns out, already been evolved into a more comprehensive field, made, and hence much of this essay is defined as "the biology ofbehavior" (Eibl- historical. Eibesfeldt, 1970) or "the biological study of behavior" (Tinbergen, 1963). For many years there was little communi- cation between ethologists and experi- mental psychologists and none to speak I thank P. T. Andronis, C. D. Cheney, R. E. Crow, J. Donahoe, P. Harzem, J. M. Johnston, F. S. Kel- of between ethologists and those who ler, T. V. Layng, B. F. Skinner, and T. Zane for worked in the operant tradition. Though comments on an early draft of this paper, as well exchanges are now common (e.g., Fan- as I. Iversen, H. Pennypacker, and G. E. Zuriff for tino & Logan, 1979; Nevin, 1973), ethol- stimulating discussions. I am also grateful to I. Iver- still remains somewhat narrow in its sen for calling my attention to the Kuo article and ogy to J. Goldstein, D. Kolker, K. Marcus, and M. Mar- focus: Ethologists still study non-human sted for assistance in library research. For reprints animals for the most part; they rely al- of this article write to Robert Epstein, Cambridge most exclusively on field studies and are Center for Behavioral Studies, 11 Ware Street, skeptical of laboratory research on be- Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138. Correspondence to: Cambridge Center for Be- havior; they are interested mainly in feral havioral Studies, 11 Ware Street, Cambridge, MA animals and are critical ofthe use oflab- 02138. oratory-bred or domesticated animals; 101 102 ROBERT EPSTEIN and so on.' "Ethology" is not an appro- of behavior. According to Keller (per- pnate label for the experimental analysis sonal communication, October 1983), of behavior or the many other scientific he first heard it in a course he had as a fields that are concerned with the deter- graduate student at Harvard in 1928. His minants of behavior. instructor, Dwight Chapman, used the A prior use ofthe term was somewhat term jokingly, and Keller, too, has used more comprehensive and closer to at least it somewhat hesitatingly ever since. It has some characterizations of modern psy- not been adopted by operant condition- chology. In Book Six ofhis classic A Sys- ers, nor by biologists. But it has been used tem of Logic, published in 1843, John fairly widely in other domains-philos- Stuart Mill proposed "ethology" as a la- ophy, education, and economics, in par- ble for what he hoped would be a new ticular- so widely that it is listed in sev- science, "the science of the formation of eral unabridged dictionaries and character." He derived the term from dictionaries ofphilosophy and behavior- "ethos" (iiOos), the Greek for "character," al science. by which he meant behavior in all of its The original OED contains no such aspects. He hoped to see the emergence listing, but the 1982 Supplement con- of a comprehensive science to supple- tains a listing 49 lines long. "Praxeolo- ment the philosophical psychology ofhis gy," "praxiology," or "praxology" (in that day, but none emerged, and the term fell order) is defined as "The study of such into disuse. The original Oxford English actions as are necessary in order to give Dictionary (henceforward, OED), which practical effect to a theory or technique; was published in installments between the science of human conduct; the sci- 1884 and 1928, gives Mill's definition, ence of efficient action." "Praxiologist" as well as two obsolete definitions from is defined only as "one who studies prac- the 17th and 18th centuries: the study of tical activity." The American standard, ethics, and the practice of mimicry. The Webster's Third New International Dic- 1933 supplement to the OED adds the tionary, published in 1966, defines first biological definition, the obvious "praxeology" or "praxiology" (again, in precursor to the modern usage: "The that order) simply as "the study of hu- branch of Natural History which deals man action and conduct." with an animal's actions and habits, its Many specialty dictionaries give sim- reaction to its environment." The first ilar definitions. Horace B. English's relevant usage is attributed to two zool- (1928) classic A Student's Dictionary of ogists, Parker and Haswell (1897), who Psychological Terms defines "praxiolo- defined it as the study of "the relation of gy" as "Study of the activities or move- the organism to its environment," which, ments or 'deeds' of an organism as a they said, had also been called "bio- whole; synonymous with behaviorism nomics." except in not denying the importance of mental processes." The Psychiatric Dic- Praxiology tionary (Hinsie & Campbell, 1970) dis- agrees on the last point: "Praxiology" is The history ofthe term "praxiology"- "Dunlap's term for the science ofbehav- also spelled "praxeology" -is consider- ior, which excludes the study of con- ably more complicated.2 F. S. Keller has sciousness and similar non-objective, proposed it from time to time (e.g., 1984) metaphysical concepts." Wolman's as a name for the experimental analysis (1973) Dictionary ofBehavioral Science defines it thus: "1. Psychology viewed as ' In Four Saints in Three Acts Gertrude Stein the study ofactions, and overt behavior. provided a suitable rejoinder: "Pigeons in the grass, 2.... Any normative science ... e.g., alas." education, social philosophy, ethics, etc., 2 The English term "praxis" is also common, but it will not be discussed in this essay, since most of that sets norms and goals for human ac- its applications have little or no relevance to the tions." The Dictionary ofPhilosophy and issues at hand. Religion (Reese, 1980) refers the reader CASE FOR PRAXICS 103 to an entry on Kotarbiinski, about whom Kotarbin'ski. Praxiology was taken up more will be said below. by-or perhaps reinvented by-indi- Many similar works contain no such viduals in four separate fields. The Polish entry, including the 1977 International philosopher Tadeusz Kotarbin'ski (e.g., Encyclopedia of Psychiatry, Psychology, 1965) defines it as "the general theory of Psychoanalysis, and Neurology (this is efficient action"-for "action" read "la- significant, since Wolman was the edi- bor" or "work"-which, he says, derives tor), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy from or is at least harmonious with such (1967), The Encyclopedia of Psycho- diverse works as Marx's Capital, Mill's analysis (1968), The Dictionary of Psy- Utilitarianism, Machiavelli's II Principe, chology and Related Fields (1971), The and Defoe's Robinson Crusoe. Though Dictionary ofthe History ofIdeas (1973), they didn't use the term, he says, George A Concise Encyclopedia of Psychiatry Herbert Mead, Talcott Parsons, and (1977), A Dictionary of Philosophy Georges Hostelet were all concerned with (1979), The Encyclopedia of Psychiatry praxiology, which he describes as fol- (1981), and the Dictionary ofPhilosophy lows: These notwithstand- (1983). omissions The praxiologist concerns himself with finding the ing, the term clearly has some legitimacy. broadest possible generalizations ofa technical na- How did it get it? ture. His objective is the technique ofgood, efficient A number of scholars assert that the work as such, indications and warnings important term originated with the London author for all work which is intended to achieve maximum and physician, Charles A. Mercier, who effectiveness. (p. 1) lived from 1852 to 1919. In his 1911 This use of "praxiology" does not rule book, Conduct and Its Disorders, he out mentalism or teleology, and the field wrote: "Apart from the general advan- Kotarbiinski describes is neither experi- tage ... of having a systematic knowl- mental nor data based. Chapter 14 ofhis edge ofconduct as a whole; there are cer- 1965 book is entitled "Mental Activity" tain special advantages to be derived from and reads in part: a study of Praxiology, if I may so term ..
Recommended publications
  • 'Introspectionism' and the Mythical Origins of Scientific Psychology

    'Introspectionism' and the Mythical Origins of Scientific Psychology

    Consciousness and Cognition Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 634–654 www.elsevier.com/locate/concog ‘Introspectionism’ and the mythical origins of scientific psychology Alan Costall Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, UK Received 1 May 2006 Abstract According to the majority of the textbooks, the history of modern, scientific psychology can be tidily encapsulated in the following three stages. Scientific psychology began with a commitment to the study of mind, but based on the method of introspection. Watson rejected introspectionism as both unreliable and effete, and redefined psychology, instead, as the science of behaviour. The cognitive revolution, in turn, replaced the mind as the subject of study, and rejected both behaviourism and a reliance on introspection. This paper argues that all three stages of this history are largely mythical. Introspectionism was never a dominant movement within modern psychology, and the method of introspection never went away. Furthermore, this version of psychology’s history obscures some deep conceptual problems, not least surrounding the modern conception of ‘‘behaviour,’’ that continues to make the scientific study of consciousness seem so weird. Ó 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Introspection; Introspectionism; Behaviourism; Dualism; Watson; Wundt 1. Introduction Probably the most immediate result of the acceptance of the behaviorist’s view will be the elimination of self-observation and of the introspective reports resulting from such a method. (Watson, 1913b, p. 428). The problem of consciousness occupies an analogous position for cognitive psychology as the prob- lem of language behavior does for behaviorism, namely, an unsolved anomaly within the domain of an approach.
  • Psychological Bulletin

    Psychological Bulletin

    Vol. 19, No. 8 August, 1922 THE PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HISTORY OF PSYCHOLOGY— 1916-1921 By COLEMAN R. GRIFFITH University of Illinois Contributions to the history of psychology since 1915 fall nat- urally into two groups. There are, on the one hand, the systematic and the experimental studies which have made the science six years older. There are, on the other hand, the historical and biographical notes and the large and searching retrospections which relate con- temporary psychology to earlier stages in the development of the science. It is to an enumeration of these contributions that the present paper is devoted. We cannot, of course, comment in detail upon the character of contemporary psychology, for an historian, speaking of his own times is like the Hawaiian surf-rider who seeks to judge the incoming tide from his experiences while riding a single wave; but it is possible to get a certain amount of information about the current trend of a science by considering events of various kinds which reflect or which have, presumably, influenced its general course. These events taken in conjunction with what appear, at the present moment, to be outstanding experimental and systematic studies may give a suggestion of the history of the last few years. In psychology, as well as in many other sciences, the most important event, during the period under survey, was the World War. The science of psychology was, as all know, well on the way toward complete mobilization for military purposes when the war ended. Since many of the consequences of this reorganization have not yet appeared, a detailed account of this aspect of the period must fall to a future historian.
  • The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism

    The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism

    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2000) 23, 573–644 Printed in the United States of America The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism Steven W. Gangestad Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 [email protected] Jeffry A. Simpson Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 [email protected]. Abstract: During human evolutionary history, there were “trade-offs” between expending time and energy on child-rearing and mating, so both men and women evolved conditional mating strategies guided by cues signaling the circumstances. Many short-term matings might be successful for some men; others might try to find and keep a single mate, investing their effort in rearing her offspring. Recent evidence suggests that men with features signaling genetic benefits to offspring should be preferred by women as short-term mates, but there are trade-offs between a mate’s genetic fitness and his willingness to help in child-rearing. It is these circumstances and the cues that signal them that underlie the variation in short- and long-term mating strategies between and within the sexes. Keywords: conditional strategies; evolutionary psychology; fluctuating asymmetry; mating; reproductive strategies; sexual selection Research on interpersonal relationships, especially roman- attributes (e.g., physical attractiveness) tend to assume tic ones, has increased markedly in the last three decades greater importance in mating relationships than in other (see Berscheid & Reis 1998) across a variety of fields, in- types of relationships (Buss 1989; Gangestad & Buss 1993 cluding social psychology, anthropology, ethology, sociol- [see also Kenrick & Keefe: “Age Preferences in Mates Re- ogy, developmental psychology, and personology (Ber- flect Sex Differences in Human Reproductive Strategies” scheid 1994).
  • Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links Across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2

    Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links Across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2

    Psychological Topics, 26 (2017), 1, 89-137 Original Scientific Paper – UDC – 616.89-008.442.6 159.923.3.072 613.88 Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2 David P. Schmitt - Bradley University, USA, Lidia Alcalay - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Jüri Allik - University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, I.C.B. Alves - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Craig A. Anderson - Iowa State University, USA, A.L. Angelini - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Jens B. Asendorpf - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Ivars Austers - University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, Isabel Balaguer - University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, Américo Baptista - University of Lusofona-Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, Sóley S. Bender - University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, Kevin Bennett - Penn State University-Beaver, USA, Gabriel Bianchi - Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, Behrooz Birashk - Faculty of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Tehran Psychiatric Institute, Tehran, Iran, April Bleske-Rechek - University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, USA, Fredrick A. Boholst - University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines, Lynda Boothroyd - University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, Teresa Borja - Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, Arjan Bos - Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Edwin Brainerd - Clemson University, USA, David P. Schmitt, Department of Psychology, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 62625, USA until August of 2017. Afterward send correspondence to David P. Schmitt, Psychology Division, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Data collection representing Costa Rica was from the University of Costa Rica and was supported by the University of Costa Rica Psychological Research Institute.
  • Cognitive Psychology

    Cognitive Psychology

    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997,4 (3), 342-349 T. V. Moore's (1939) Cognitive Psychology AIMEEM. SURPRENANT and IANNEATH Purdue University, WestLafayette, Indiana Thomas Verner Moore published a book called Cognitive Psychology in 1939,almost 30 years be­ fore Neisser's (1967) more familiar and far more influential work. Although it covers most of the stan­ dard topics found in current cognitive psychology textbooks, and even anticipated several current trends, Moore's text is not cited by any ofthe major histories of the "cognitive revolution" or any cur­ rent cognitive textbook. Weprovide a briefsketch of Moore's academic life and summarize several of his papers that are still cited. After describing the psychologies prevalent in 1939,we compare Moore's text with two contemporary works, Woodworth (1938) and McGeoch (1942). We conclude by com­ paring the older textwith Neisser's and by offering several reasons why the book is virtually unknown. Cognitive psychology differs from other areas of sci­ ner, 1985; Lachman, Lachman, & Butterfield, 1979) or entific psychology in that it loudly and proudly proclaims any ofthe current undergraduate cognitive textbooks cite to have arisen out ofa (largely bloodless) revolution. The the work. Neisser himselfwas unaware ofthe earlier vol­ very phrase "cognitive revolution" implies a fundamen­ ume until a few years after his version was published; in­ tal change in theories and research into human thought deed, his title might have been different ifhe had known and behavior and a complete overthrow of the previous about the earlier work (Neisser, personal communica­ way of thinking. As with most revolutions, the circum­ tion, June 1996).
  • Chapter Seven Functionalism: Development and Founding

    Chapter Seven Functionalism: Development and Founding

    Chapter Seven Functionalism: Development and Founding PSY 495 History and Systems Dr. Rick Grieve Western Kentucky University Evolution Comes to America z Background – 1900: American psychology had taken on a life of its own z Functions of the mind z Individualism, inventiveness, and ingenuity z Herbert Spencer (1820(1820--1903)1903) – Kooky, but became a hero in America – Social Darwinism z Evolution and natural selection apply to the social realm Evolution Comes to America z Spencer argued that the development of all aspects of the universe follows evolutionary principles – Including human character and social institution z “survival of the fittest” – Those who are best adapted will be those most likely to survive and pass traits on to future generations – Only the best will survive – Leave people and organizations alone to develop themselves and society in their own ways • Those which cannot adapt are unfit for survival and should be allowed to perish • This way, society could eventually achieve perfection 1 Evolution Comes to America – Synthetic Philosophy z Knowledge and experience can be explained in terms of evolutionary principles z Principles of Psychology (1855) – Mind exists in its present form because of past and continuing efforts to adapt to various environments The Continuing Evolution of Machines z Henry Hollerith and the Punched Cards – Hollerith was an engineer who developed punched cards z Improve d the a bilitbility o f mac hines to process da ta – Radically altered info processing – Renewed hopes (and fears) that
  • Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations Author(S): J

    Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations Author(S): J

    Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations Author(s): J. G. Morawski Source: Isis, Vol. 77, No. 2 (Jun., 1986), pp. 219-242 Published by: University of Chicago Press on behalf of History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/232650 Accessed: 22-12-2015 00:42 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. History of Science Society and University of Chicago Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.133.6.95 on Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:42:52 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations By J. G. Morawski* IN 1929 JAMES ANGELL, president of Yale, announced plans for a unique teaching and research center for those fields "directly concerned with the problems of man's individual and group conduct. The purpose is to correlate knowledge and coordinate technique in related fields that greater progress may be made in the understanding of human life. The time has certainly come once again to attempt a fruitful synthesis of knowledge." The New York Times described the experiment as dismantling the disciplinary "Great Wall of China" and compared it with the Renaissance transformation of knowledge.1 The Insti- tute of Human Relations (IHR), as the center was named, received over $4.5 million from the Rockefeller Foundation for its first decade of operation.
  • Psychologists and Physicians in the Borderlands of Science, 1900-1942

    Psychologists and Physicians in the Borderlands of Science, 1900-1942

    PSYCHOLOGISTS AND PHYSICIANS IN THE BORDERLANDS OF SCIENCE, 1900-1942 By WADE EDWARD PICKREN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1995 For my mother: WILLIE MERLE PICKREN, and in memoriam, BILL PICKREN, You taught me to love and work. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my deepest gratitude to the chairman of my dissertation committee, Donald A. Dewsbury. Dr. Dewsbury has, from the beginning of this long project, been a model of encouragement, kindness, and unfailing generosity. He has shared his time, his great breadth of learning, his editorial ability, and his materials with me. My understanding of the history of psychology has been greatly deepened by our conversations. I also wish to acknowledge that Dr. Dewsbury has helped me to understand that data is a plural! Dr. Wilse B. Webb has also stimulated much thought in me about what I was doing and where I was going with my ideas. Although I did not avail myself of his wisdom as oft as I would have liked, his voice and his sharp eye were always with me. I hope that, in the future, time will allow me a greater opportunity to benefit from his great knowledge and experience. Both near at hand and from afar, Dr. Toby Appel has blessed me with the keenness of her insight . Her acceptance and friendly corrections of my halting efforts to write history have been much appreciated. One of my most pleasant memories of this experience is that of sitting at a table at iii Cafe Gardens talking about the history of biology or psychology, while hoping to hear some Van Morrison on the house music system.
  • Direct Perception (Michaels & Carello, 1981)

    Direct Perception (Michaels & Carello, 1981)

    Direct Perception Claire F Michaels LAKE FOREST COLLEGE Claudia Carello UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT PRENTICE-HALL, INC, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 ii Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Michaels, Claire F. (1948) Direct perception. (Century psychology series) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Perception. 2. Environmental psychology. I. Carello, Claudia, joint author. 11. Title. BF311.M496 153.7 80-28572 ISBN 0-13-214791-2 Editorial production/supervision and interior design by Edith Riker Manufacturing buyer Edmund W. Leone In Memory of JAMES JEROME GIBSON (1904-1979) CENTURY PSYCHOLOGY SERIES James J. Jenkins Walter Mischel Willard W. Hartup Editors ©1981 by Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 07632 Copyright tranferred to authors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the authors. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Prentice-Hall International, Inc., London Prentice-Hall of Australia Pty. Limited, Sydney Prentice-Hall of Canada, Ltd., Toronto Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi Prentice-HaH of Japan, Inc., Tokyo Prentice-Hall of Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd., Singapore Whitehall Books Limited, Wellington, New Zealand iii Contents Credits vi Preface vii 1 CONTRASTING VIEWS OF PERCEPTION 1 Indirect Perception: The Theory of Impoverished Input, 2 Direct Perception: The Ecological View, 9 Additional Contrasts, 13 Summary, 16 Overview of the Book, 17 iv 2 INFORMATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT 19 Invariants,
  • Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology

    Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology

    Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology Edited by Claude E. Buxton Department of Psychology Yale University New Haven, Connecticut 1985 ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers) Orlando San Diego New York London Toronto Montreal Sydney Tokyo Passages from the following are reprinted by permission of the publishers: Newell, Α., Duncker on Thinking, in S. Koch & D. Leary (Eds.), A Century of Psychology as Science. Copyright 1985 by McGraw-Hill. Neisser, U., Cognitive Psychology. © 1967 by Prentice-Hall. COPYRIGHT © 1985 BY ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPY, RECORDING, OR ANY INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBLISHER. ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. Orlando, Florida 32887 United Kingdom Edition published by ACADEMIC PRESS INC. (LONDON) LTD. 24-28 Oval Road, London NW1 7DX LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING IN PUBLICATION DATA Main entry under title: Points of view in the modern history of psychology. Includes indexes. 1. Psychology— History. I. Buxton, Claude E. BF81.P57 1985 150\9 85-4010 ISBN 0-12-148510-2 (alk. paper) PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 85 86 87 88 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contributors Numbers in parentheses indicate the pages on which the authors' contributions begin. Mitchell G. Ash (295), Department of History, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 William Bevan (259), John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, Illinois 60603 Arthur L. Blumenthal (19, 51), Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Claude E.
  • Distinguished Contributions to Engineering Psychology

    Distinguished Contributions to Engineering Psychology

    Who Made Distinguished Contributions to Engineering Psychology EDITED BY Henry L. Taylor Contents Introduction 1 HENRY L TAYLOR APA Division 21: Roots and Rooters 4 EARL A. ALLUISI Paul Morris Fitts, 1912-1965 23 RICHARD W. PEW Jack W. Dunlap, 1902-1977 45 JESSE ORLANSKY Alexander Coxe Williams, Jr., 1914-1962 68 STANLEY N. ROSCOE Ross A. McFarland, 1901-1976 94 MALCOLM L. RITCHIE George Edward Briggs, 1926-1974 108 W. C. HOWELL Jerome Hirsch Ely, 1924-1963 117 MARTIN A. TOLCOTT Introduction HENRY L. TAYLOR Director, Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign John J. O'Hare proposed in 1987 establishing an ad hoc Committee on Monographs of Distinguished Division 21 members. The Executive Committee, at its August 1987 meeting, approved the proposal and requested that he chair the committee. The criteria for the selection of candidates for a monograph were that a person be a past member of Division 21, deceased, and distinguished for his or her contribution to engineering psychology. The criteria for selection of authors to write about the candidates were familiarity with the candidate, willingness to allow the APA to hold copyright of materials, agreement that all royalties for sale of publication would be assigned to Division 21, and agreement that each essay would be completed in time to make a Division 21 contribution to the celebration of the APA's centenary. The following announcement was published in the fall1988 issue of the Division 21 Newsletter,16(1): Monographs of Distinguished Members As a contribution to the celebration of APA's centenary in 1992, Division 21 would like to prepare monographs on deceased members of our Division who have made distinguished contributions to the field of applied experimental psychology or engineering psychology.
  • Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links Across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2

    Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links Across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2

    Psychological Topics, 26 (2017), 1, 89-137 Original Scientific Paper – UDC – 616.89-008.442.6 159.923.3.072 613.88 Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2 David P. Schmitt - Bradley University, USA, Lidia Alcalay - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Jüri Allik - University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, I.C.B. Alves - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Craig A. Anderson - Iowa State University, USA, A.L. Angelini - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Jens B. Asendorpf - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Ivars Austers - University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, Isabel Balaguer - University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, Américo Baptista - University of Lusofona-Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, Sóley S. Bender - University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, Kevin Bennett - Penn State University-Beaver, USA, Gabriel Bianchi - Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, Behrooz Birashk - Faculty of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Tehran Psychiatric Institute, Tehran, Iran, April Bleske-Rechek - University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, USA, Fredrick A. Boholst - University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines, Lynda Boothroyd - University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, Teresa Borja - Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, Arjan Bos - Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Edwin Brainerd - Clemson University, USA, David P. Schmitt, Department of Psychology, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 62625, USA until August of 2017. Afterward send correspondence to David P. Schmitt, Psychology Division, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Data collection representing Costa Rica was from the University of Costa Rica and was supported by the University of Costa Rica Psychological Research Institute.