The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2000) 23, 573–644 Printed in the United States of America The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism Steven W. Gangestad Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 [email protected] Jeffry A. Simpson Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 [email protected]. Abstract: During human evolutionary history, there were “trade-offs” between expending time and energy on child-rearing and mating, so both men and women evolved conditional mating strategies guided by cues signaling the circumstances. Many short-term matings might be successful for some men; others might try to find and keep a single mate, investing their effort in rearing her offspring. Recent evidence suggests that men with features signaling genetic benefits to offspring should be preferred by women as short-term mates, but there are trade-offs between a mate’s genetic fitness and his willingness to help in child-rearing. It is these circumstances and the cues that signal them that underlie the variation in short- and long-term mating strategies between and within the sexes. Keywords: conditional strategies; evolutionary psychology; fluctuating asymmetry; mating; reproductive strategies; sexual selection Research on interpersonal relationships, especially roman- attributes (e.g., physical attractiveness) tend to assume tic ones, has increased markedly in the last three decades greater importance in mating relationships than in other (see Berscheid & Reis 1998) across a variety of fields, in- types of relationships (Buss 1989; Gangestad & Buss 1993 cluding social psychology, anthropology, ethology, sociol- [see also Kenrick & Keefe: “Age Preferences in Mates Re- ogy, developmental psychology, and personology (Ber- flect Sex Differences in Human Reproductive Strategies” scheid 1994). Unfortunately, these diverse perspectives BBS 15(1) 1992]). Specific facial and body features predict have not coalesced into larger, more integrative theories of the attractiveness of mates in nearly all cultures (Cunning- how and why relationships function the way they do. ham et al. 1990; Jones & Hill 1993; Perrett et al. 1994). Evolutionary principles can integrate the findings on in- Marriage is culturally universal (Daly & Wilson 1988). This terpersonal relationships, especially concerning mating and parental behavior. In the evolutionary approach one tries to understand human psychological design – the nature, or- ganization, and operation of domain-specific psychological mechanisms – by identifying plausible constraints from Steven W. Gangestad is Professor of Psychology and selection pressures during evolutionary history (see Buss Regents’ Lecturer at the University of New Mexico. He 1995). Human behavior is highly flexible and environmen- received his Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in tally responsive but “[psychological] designs that produce 1986. In the past decade, his major research interests ‘plasticity’ can be retained by selection only if they have fea- have been in evolutionary psychology, with particular emphasis on human sexual selection, the evolution of tures that guide behavior into the infinitesimally small re- mating strategies, the maintenance of genetic variation gions of relatively successful performance with sufficient in populations, and the evolutionary-genetic underpin- frequency” (Tooby & Cosmides 1992, p. 101). To under- nings of neurodevelopmental variation. stand behavioral flexibility (i.e., the ability to adjust adap- tively to specific environmental circumstances), especially Jeffry A. Simpson, Professor of Psychology at Texas in the form of cultural variation, one must understand the A&M University, received his Ph.D. from the Univer- psychological architecture that guides social interactions. sity of Minnesota in 1986. He has written over 70 pub- Romantic relationships have several unique qualities lications in social/personality psychology. Most of his research focuses on interpersonal relationships, partic- that distinguish them from other types of relationships. ularly mating, attachment, and relationship mainte- Romantic love, for example, differs from other forms of nance processes. He has served on the Social Psychol- love (Hendrick & Hendrick 1986). Sexual jealousy has fea- ogy grant panel at the National Science Foundation, tures and consequences that differ from other types of jeal- serves on the editorial boards of several journals, and ousy (Daly & Wilson 1988; Daly et al. 1983). Specialized currently is the editor of the journal Personal Relation- verbal and nonverbal courtship rituals are observed in vir- ships. tually all cultures (Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1989). Certain personal © 2000 Cambridge University Press 0140-525X/00 $12.50 573 Gangestad & Simpson: Evolution and human mating all suggests that a specialized psychological architecture 1. Basic evolutionary concepts may underlie and guide romantic interactions. This would make sense considering the importance of mating, repro- 1.1. Sexual selection duction, and parenting throughout evolutionary history. Sexual selection refers to discrepancies in reproduction The fact that the ties between mating and reproduction rates among individuals resulting from the various “advan- can now be severed by contraception does not imply that tages” in mating, independent of advantages resulting from evolved psychological mechanisms no longer influence hu- differential survival. Evolutionary biologists have tradition- man mating (see Symons 1987; 1992; Thornhill 1991; ally studied the effects of sexual selection on two kinds of Tooby & Cosmides 1992). [See also BBS multiple book re- adaptations: (a) intrasexual competitive abilities, and (b) view of Symons’s The Evolution of Human Sexuality, BBS specialized signals that appeal to members of the opposite 2, 1980.] sex (Andersson 1994). In many species, the number of dif- Evolutionary theories of human mating have been heav- ferent mates that one sex can obtain is related directly and ily influenced by research on mating in other animals (see strongly to reproductive success, whereas this is less true of Campbell et al. 1999). These theories – especially Trivers’s the other sex. In most mammals, the former sex is male, and (1972) theory of sexual selection and parental investment – the latter, female (whose reproductive output is limited by clarified the major (and slightly different) barriers that internal gestation and lactation). Thus, in most mammals, males and females in most species must surmount to in- females are a limited reproductive resource for males, who crease their inclusive fitness. Trivers’s work launched the compete to attract mates. Given this disparity, sexual selec- strong theoretical and empirical focus on sex differences in tion pressures should have acted more strongly on the male human mating strategies, most of which has tried to explain intrasexual competitive abilities and the specialized signals why women, in comparison with men, tend to be more dis- appealing to female preferences than vice versa (see Cronin criminating when choosing mates and more “restricted” in 1991; Trivers 1972). Empirical evidence supports these their sexual behavior. Recently, Buss and Schmitt (1993) predictions in many different species (see Trivers 1985). have applied and extended many of Trivers’s ideas in devel- Theories about the signals or cues that females prefer in oping their Sexual Strategies Theory (SST). The focus on mates have focused on two types: (a) attributes that tend to sex differences in human mating has been criticized, how- signal qualities of a “good parent” (or a “good provider”), ever, for not explaining why there is more variation in mat- and (b) attributes suggesting that an individual may have ing-related behaviors within sexes than between (see “good genes” (Cronin 1991; Gangestad 1993; Miller 1998). Gangestad & Simpson 1990) and for not considering how Theories of good parenting have been fairly uncontrover- women’s control of resources may have influenced the mat- sial. Those involving good genes, on the other hand, have ing strategies of both sexes (see Gowaty 1992a; 1992b; Hrdy been debated extensively (see sect. 3). Consequently, most 1997). applications of sexual selection to human mating have not In this target article, we show how evolutionary princi- seriously considered good-gene sexual selection. Recently, ples can extend and deepen our understanding of human however, theoretical and empirical research has indicated mating, and how and why both sexes display both short- and that both good-parenting and good-gene selection could long-term mating tactics in certain contexts. SST (Buss & have operated on many species (Kirkpatrick 1996; Møller Schmitt 1993) tries to explain why men tend to adopt short- 1994b), particularly those in which males provide substan- term mating tactics more often than women. SST also em- tial parental care (as is true of humans). In what follows, we phasizes that both men and women have evolved mixed will argue that these selectional processes are likely to have strategies involving both long- and short-term matings. Af- produced differential mating tactics within each sex. ter reviewing SST, we will argue that selection produced Natural selection also has important implications for hu- mixed strategies that depend on environmental circum- man mating. In many species, parental care by males might stances and their cues. Men and women accordingly shift have evolved
Recommended publications
  • 'Introspectionism' and the Mythical Origins of Scientific Psychology
    Consciousness and Cognition Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 634–654 www.elsevier.com/locate/concog ‘Introspectionism’ and the mythical origins of scientific psychology Alan Costall Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, UK Received 1 May 2006 Abstract According to the majority of the textbooks, the history of modern, scientific psychology can be tidily encapsulated in the following three stages. Scientific psychology began with a commitment to the study of mind, but based on the method of introspection. Watson rejected introspectionism as both unreliable and effete, and redefined psychology, instead, as the science of behaviour. The cognitive revolution, in turn, replaced the mind as the subject of study, and rejected both behaviourism and a reliance on introspection. This paper argues that all three stages of this history are largely mythical. Introspectionism was never a dominant movement within modern psychology, and the method of introspection never went away. Furthermore, this version of psychology’s history obscures some deep conceptual problems, not least surrounding the modern conception of ‘‘behaviour,’’ that continues to make the scientific study of consciousness seem so weird. Ó 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Introspection; Introspectionism; Behaviourism; Dualism; Watson; Wundt 1. Introduction Probably the most immediate result of the acceptance of the behaviorist’s view will be the elimination of self-observation and of the introspective reports resulting from such a method. (Watson, 1913b, p. 428). The problem of consciousness occupies an analogous position for cognitive psychology as the prob- lem of language behavior does for behaviorism, namely, an unsolved anomaly within the domain of an approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Theory Throughout the Text)
    Author Bios: Jon A. Sefcek, MA, Barbara H. Brumbach, MA, Geneva Vasquez, MA, are PhD students in the Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Geoffrey F. Miller, PhD, is Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. Address correspondence to Jon A. Sefcek at [email protected] The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mate Choice: How Ecology, Genes, Fertility, and Fashion Influence Mating Behavior Jon A. Sefcek, MA, Barbara H. Brumbach, MA, Geneva Vasquez, MA, and Geoffrey F. Miller, PhD The recent incorporation of sexual selection theories into the rubric of Evolutionary Psychology has produced an important framework from which to examine human mating behavior. Here we review the extant empirical and theoretical work regarding heterosexual human mating preferences and reproductive strategies. Initially, we review contemporary Evolutionary Psychology’s adaptationism, including the incorporation of modern theories of sexual selection, adaptive genetic variation, and mate choice. Next, we examine women’s and men’s mating preferences focusing on the adaptive significance of material, genetic and fertility benefits, and their relationship to environmental characteristics. Following this, we consider human mate choice in relation to non-adaptive preferences. This discussion ends with a look at context effects for individual differences in mate-preferences and reproductive strategies. KEY WORDS: Sexual selection, fitness indicators, mate choice, mating preferences, mating strategies, parental investment From colorful birds and dancing bees to Sinatra’s crooning, Betty Davis’s eyes, and Monty Python’s satires, various phenotypic traits serve as signals to others. Aposematism (warning coloration) in butterflies, for example, cautions predators that the butterfly is poisonous (Joron, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Human Mating Strategies Human Mating Strategies
    Human Mating Strategies Human Mating Strategies As descendants of a long line of successful maters, modern humans have inherited the mating strategies that led to their forebear’s success. These include long-term mating, short-term mating, and mixed mating strategies. This article presents empirical evi- dence supporting evolution-based hypotheses about the complexities of these mating strategies, which differ substantially for men and women. array of adaptations specifically dedicated to the David M. Buss, Professor, task of mating. Department of Psychology, Nowhere do people have an equal desire to mate University of Texas, Austin with all people. Everywhere, some people are pre- ferred as mates, others shunned. Desires are central to all facets of mating. They determine who we are attracted to, and who is attracted to us. They influ- ence which attraction tactics will be successful (those that fulfill desires) and which attraction tac- tics will fail (those that violate desires). Successful mate retention tactics involve continuing to provide resources that fulfill the desires of a mate. Failure to Perhaps no adaptive domain is more central to re- fulfill these desires causes breakup and divorce. At production than mating. Those in our evolutionary every step of the mating process, from mate selec- past who failed to mate failed to become ancestors. tion to mate expulsion, desires determine the Modern humans are all descendants of a long and ground rules. unbroken line of ancestors who succeeded in the complex and sometimes circuitous tasks involved in Sexual Selection and Parental Investment mating. As their descendants, modern humans have Although Charles Darwin (1859) recognized that inherited the adaptations that led to the success of survival was central to the evolutionary process, their ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • RAM Dissertation
    A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP ATTACHMENT MODEL (RAM) WITH MARRIED INDIVIDUALS A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Morgan C. Van Epp Cutlip August, 2013 A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP ATTACHMENT MODEL (RAM) WITH MARRIED INDIVIDUALS Morgan C. Van Epp Cutlip Dissertation Approved: Accepted: Advisor Department Chair Dr. John Queener Dr. Karin Jordan Committee Member Associate Dean of the College Dr. Susan I. Hardin Dr. Susan J. Olson Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. David Tokar Dr. George R. Newkome Committee Member Date Dr. Ingrid Weigold Committee Member Dr. Francis Broadway ii ABSTRACT The current study explored the theoretical underpinnings of the Relationship Attachment Model, an alternative model to understanding closeness in relationships, using deductive qualitative analysis (DQA; Gilgun, 2010). Qualitative data from married couples was used to explore whether the five bonding dynamics (i.e. know, trust, rely, commit, and sex), proposed by the RAM, existed in their marital relationships. Additionally, this study examined whether the RAM could explain fluctuations in closeness and distance in the couple’s marriage and how married couples described and talked about love in their relationship. The findings of this research indicated that the five bonding dynamics put forth by the RAM did exist in marital relationships of these couples and that the complicated dynamics that occur in marital relationships could be captured on the RAM. This research supported findings from past research on close relationships and added to the literature by proposing another model to understanding and conceptualizing close relationship dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection
    Sexual Selection Carol E. Lee University of Wisconsin Copyright ©2020 Do not upload without permission Natural Selection Evolutionary Mechanisms Genetic Drift Migration Non-adaptive Mutations Natural Selection Adaptive OUTLINE (1) Sexual Selection (2) Constraints on Natural Selection Pleiotropy Evolutionary Tradeoffs Genetic Drift and Natural Selection ■ There are species with 3 or more sexes (some ciliates have 32)... Too complex to discuss here ■ Restrict my discussion here to 2 sexes Male Female Male Female Male Female HUH???? What about us??? (New World Monkeys) Theory of Sexual Selection ■ The sex bearing a higher cost to reproduction or has higher parental investment will generally be the chooser (has more to lose from bad choice) ■ Whereas the sex bearing the lesser cost of reproduction or parental investment generally competes more heavily for mates (Bateman 1948) Asymmetric Limits on Fitness • The sex that has higher reproductive cost will be the choosers • If you’re allocating a lot of resources toward offspring and are limited in the number of offspring you can have, you won’t mate with just anyone • The sex that is being selected (under sexual selection) will be competitive • Fight with each other, fight for resources, fight for access to or control of the other sex Theory of Sexual Selection ■ In sexual species, it is usually males who invest less in each offspring à it is typical for males to compete for access to females ■ In 90% of mammal species, females provide substantial parental care, while males provide little or
    [Show full text]
  • Variance in the Male Reproductive Success of Western Gorillas: Acquiring Females Is Just the Beginning
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2010) 64:515–528 DOI 10.1007/s00265-009-0867-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Variance in the male reproductive success of western gorillas: acquiring females is just the beginning Thomas Breuer & Andrew M. Robbins & Claudia Olejniczak & Richard J. Parnell & Emma J. Stokes & Martha M. Robbins Received: 26 April 2009 /Revised: 17 September 2009 /Accepted: 18 September 2009 /Published online: 14 October 2009 # Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract Variance in male reproductive success is that enhance offspring survival. Thus, this study illustrates expected to be high in sexually dimorphic mammals, even how a detailed analysis of the components of male when it is modulated by the costs and benefits of group reproductive success can shed light on the interrelated living. Here, we investigate the variance in reproductive social and ecological aspects that affect it. success of male western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla), a highly dimorphic primate with long-term male–female associa- Keywords Harem size . Intrasexual competition . tions, using 12.5 years of data collected at Mbeli Bai in Mating success . Offspring survival . northern Congo. Access to mates and offspring survival Variance in reproductive success were both major sources of variance in male reproductive success. Males with larger harems had lower offspring mortality with no apparent reduction in female fertility or Introduction observed tenure length, so the size of harems did not seem to be limited by female feeding competition or by the risk High variance in male reproductive success is assumed to of takeovers and infanticide by outsider males. The lower provide a potential for sexual selection that can lead to mortality in larger harems may reflect improved vigilance sexual dimorphism (Darwin 1871; Andersson 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • THE DYNAMICS of ATTACHMENT and SEX 1 Evolved to Be Connected
    Running head: THE DYNAMICS OF ATTACHMENT AND SEX 1 Evolved to Be Connected: The Dynamics of Attachment and Sex over the Course of Romantic Relationships Gurit E. Birnbaum Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya Harry T. Reis University of Rochester Word count: 2,029 (50 references) January 31, 2018 Send Correspondence: Gurit E. Birnbaum, Ph.D. Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya P.O. Box 167 Herzliya, 46150, Israel Email address: [email protected] THE DYNAMICS OF ATTACHMENT AND SEX 2 Highlights The sexual system operates as an attachment-facilitating device. Attachment processes link sexuality with relationship quality. Sexual desire functions as a visceral gauge of romantic compatibility. Desire becomes sensitive to different partner traits as relationships develop. Desire is important for relationship persistence when relationships are fragile. THE DYNAMICS OF ATTACHMENT AND SEX 3 Abstract Sexual urges and emotional attachments are not always connected. Still, joint operation of the sexual and the attachment systems is typical of romantic relationships. Hence, within this context, the two systems mutually influence each other and operate together to affect relationship well-being. In this article, we review evidence indicating that sex promotes enduring bonds between partners and provide an overview of the contribution of attachment processes to understanding the sex-relationship linkage. We then present a model delineating the functional significance of sex in relationship development. We conclude by suggesting future directions for studying the dual potential of sex for either deepening attachment to a current valued partner or promoting a new relationship when the existing relationship has become less rewarding. (120 words) Key words: attachment; sex; relationship development; romantic relationships THE DYNAMICS OF ATTACHMENT AND SEX 4 Evolved to Be Connected: The Dynamics of Attachment and Sex over the Course of Romantic Relationships Sexual urges and emotional attachments are not always connected [1].
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review of Three Theories for Music's Origin a Thesis Presented
    A Critical Review of Three Theories for Music’s Origin A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Kevin W. Kondik March 2010 © 2010 Kevin W. Kondik. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled A Critical Review of Three Theories for Music’s Origin by KEVIN W. KONDIK has been approved for the Department of Philosophy and the College of Arts and Sciences by Arthur Zucker Associate Professor of Philosophy Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT KONDIK, KEVIN, W.,, M.A., March 2010, Philosophy A Critical Review of Three Theories for Music’s Origin (82 pp.) Director of Thesis: Arthur Zucker This thesis compares three theories which debate whether or not the trait of music is constitutive of a biological adaptation. Steven Pinker advances a view that music cannot be an adaptation because making or responding to music utilizes faculties which evolved for other reasons. On the next view, Geoffrey Miller claims that music is a sexually selected trait which evolved primarily to seduce potential mates. Finally, Ian Cross argues that music can be seen as an extension of juvenile behaviors into adulthood and has efficacy in the consolidation of bonds within a group. I conclude that all three theories are insufficient as an explanation of why music evolved in the hominid lineage. The main reasons why these theories all fail is they all rely upon a speculative historical reconstructions and imprecise definitions of music.
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing the Highest Hurdle: Human-Based Case Studies Broaden Students’ Knowledge of Core Evolutionary Concepts
    The Journal of Effective Teaching an online journal devoted to teaching excellence Clearing the highest hurdle: Human-based case studies broaden students’ knowledge of core evolutionary concepts Alexander J. Werth1 Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943 Abstract An anonymous survey instrument was used for a ten year study to gauge college student attitudes toward evolution. Results indicate that students are most likely to accept evolu- tion as a historical process for change in physical features of non-human organisms. They are less likely to accept evolution as an ongoing process that shapes all traits (including biochemical, physiological, and behavioral) in humans. Students who fail to accept the factual nature of human evolution do not gain an accurate view of evolution, let alone modern biology. Fortunately, because of students’ natural curiosity about their bodies and related topics (e.g., medicine, vestigial features, human prehistory), a pedagogical focus on human evolution provides a fun and effective way to teach core evolutionary concepts, as quantified by the survey. Results of the study are presented along with useful case studies involving human evolution. Keywords: Survey, pedagogy, biology, evolution, Darwin. All science educators face pedagogical difficulties, but when considering the social rami- fications of scientific ideas, few face as great a challenge as biology teachers. Studies consistently show more than half of Americans reject any concept of biological evolution (Harris Poll, 2005, Miller et al., 2006). Students embody just such a cross-section of soci- ety. Much ink has been spilled explaining how best to teach evolution, particularly to unwilling students (Cavallo and McCall, 2008, Nelson, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • FEMALE BONDING in CECELIA AHERN's LOVE, ROSIE Fahriana
    FEMALE BONDING IN CECELIA AHERN’S LOVE, ROSIE Fahriana Arviyanti/1611403131 Program Studi Sastra Inggris FS Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jln. Semolowaru No.45, Menur Pumpungan, Sukolilo, Kota Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60118 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: This study is about bonding that happens among the female characters: Rosie, Stephanie, Mom, Ruby and Katie. This bonding is called female bonding. Female bonding is commonly exposed when they usually share activities and emotions each other. To prove the existence of bonding among female characters, the writer decides to do a study on the novel entitled Love, Rosie by Cecelia Ahern. Applying feminist literary criticism and qualitative research method, the writer analyzed three characteristics of female bonding: 1)Friendship 2)Attachment 3)Cooperation. From the analysis, the writer concludes that female bonding happening among the females characters on novel that shows understanding, sharing activities, worries, trust and appreciation. The female bonding can make people more positive and give good impact for each other. Keywords: bonding, female bonding, friendship, attachment, cooperation INTRODUCTION According to Hazar and Campa normative developmental transition (2013:2) early bonding experiences from parental to peer to partner from infancy through adolescence. attachment. Abel (1981:3) female The chapters in this part address the bonding exemplifies a mode of basics of ethological attachment relational self-definition whose theory, the coevolution of infant– increasing prominence is evident in caregiver behavior systems, and the the revival of psychoanalytic interest in object-relations theory and in the eventhough she is new to Rosie’s life. dynamics of transference and And her daughter, Katie who always countertransference, as well as in the supports and undertands her.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection
    Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY REPRODUCTION & SEXUAL SELECTION • Asexual • Sexual – Attraction, Courtship, and Mating – Fertilization – Production of Young The Evolutionary Enigma of Benefits of Asex Sexual Reproduction • Sexual reproduction produces fewer reproductive offspring than asexual reproduction, a so-called reproductive handicap 1. Eliminate problem to locate, court, & retain suitable mate. Asexual reproduction Sexual reproduction Generation 1 2. Doubles population growth rate. Female Female 3. Avoid “cost of meiosis”: Generation 2 – genetic representation in later generations isn't reduced by half each time Male 4. Preserve gene pool adapted to local Generation 3 conditions. Generation 4 Figure 23.16 The Energetic Costs of Sexual Reproduction Benefits of Sex • Allocation of Resources 1. Reinforcement of social structure 2. Variability in face of changing environment. – why buy four lottery tickets w/ the same number on them? Relative benefits: Support from organisms both asexual in constant & sexual in changing environments – aphids have wingless female clones & winged male & female dispersers – ciliates conjugate if environment is deteriorating Heyer 1 Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection Simultaneous Hermaphrodites TWO SEXES • Advantageous if limited mobility and sperm dispersal and/or low population density • Guarantee that any member of your species encountered is the • Conjugation “right” sex • Self fertilization still provides some genetic variation – Ciliate protozoans with + & - mating
    [Show full text]
  • Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links Across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2
    Psychological Topics, 26 (2017), 1, 89-137 Original Scientific Paper – UDC – 616.89-008.442.6 159.923.3.072 613.88 Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2 David P. Schmitt - Bradley University, USA, Lidia Alcalay - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Jüri Allik - University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, I.C.B. Alves - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Craig A. Anderson - Iowa State University, USA, A.L. Angelini - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Jens B. Asendorpf - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Ivars Austers - University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, Isabel Balaguer - University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, Américo Baptista - University of Lusofona-Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, Sóley S. Bender - University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, Kevin Bennett - Penn State University-Beaver, USA, Gabriel Bianchi - Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, Behrooz Birashk - Faculty of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Tehran Psychiatric Institute, Tehran, Iran, April Bleske-Rechek - University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, USA, Fredrick A. Boholst - University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines, Lynda Boothroyd - University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, Teresa Borja - Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, Arjan Bos - Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Edwin Brainerd - Clemson University, USA, David P. Schmitt, Department of Psychology, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 62625, USA until August of 2017. Afterward send correspondence to David P. Schmitt, Psychology Division, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Data collection representing Costa Rica was from the University of Costa Rica and was supported by the University of Costa Rica Psychological Research Institute.
    [Show full text]