DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Mating Strategies Human Mating Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Mating Strategies Human Mating Strategies Human Mating Strategies Human Mating Strategies As descendants of a long line of successful maters, modern humans have inherited the mating strategies that led to their forebear’s success. These include long-term mating, short-term mating, and mixed mating strategies. This article presents empirical evi- dence supporting evolution-based hypotheses about the complexities of these mating strategies, which differ substantially for men and women. array of adaptations specifically dedicated to the David M. Buss, Professor, task of mating. Department of Psychology, Nowhere do people have an equal desire to mate University of Texas, Austin with all people. Everywhere, some people are pre- ferred as mates, others shunned. Desires are central to all facets of mating. They determine who we are attracted to, and who is attracted to us. They influ- ence which attraction tactics will be successful (those that fulfill desires) and which attraction tac- tics will fail (those that violate desires). Successful mate retention tactics involve continuing to provide resources that fulfill the desires of a mate. Failure to Perhaps no adaptive domain is more central to re- fulfill these desires causes breakup and divorce. At production than mating. Those in our evolutionary every step of the mating process, from mate selec- past who failed to mate failed to become ancestors. tion to mate expulsion, desires determine the Modern humans are all descendants of a long and ground rules. unbroken line of ancestors who succeeded in the complex and sometimes circuitous tasks involved in Sexual Selection and Parental Investment mating. As their descendants, modern humans have Although Charles Darwin (1859) recognized that inherited the adaptations that led to the success of survival was central to the evolutionary process, their ancestors. many natural phenomena he observed seemed to Successful mating requires solutions of a num- baffling on the theory of »survival selection.« He ber of formidable adaptive problems. These includ- noticed phenomena such as the brilliant plumage of ing selecting a fertile mate, out-competing intrasex- peacocks, the flamboyant feathers of cardinals, and ual rivals in attracting a mate, fending off attempts the enormous antlers of deer. How could these to poach one’s mate, preventing the mate from de- metabolically costly structures possibly have evol- fecting, and engaging in all of the necessarily sexu- ved? Many seemed like open lures to predators, and al and social behaviors required for successful con- hence detrimental to survival. Darwin also noticed ception to take place. As a consequence of the num- that males and females of many species appeared to ber and complexity of mating problems humans be different in size and shape. Male elephant seals, have recurrently faced over the long expanse of hu- for example, weight roughly 4,000 pounds; female man evolutionary history, it is reasonable to antici- elephant seals weigh only 1,000 pounds. Among pate that humans have evolved a large and complex baboons, males are twice the size of females. SAMFUNDSØKONOMEN NR. 4 – 2002 47 Human Mating Strategies Among humans, males are 12 percent taller than fe- headedness in the population. The key point is that males, on average. Since both sexes have faced the desires of one sex for certain qualities in a mate roughly the same survival problems, why would can create evolutionary change – either an increase they differ in size and morphology? And what could in the frequency of desired qualities or a decrease in account for variation on the degree of sexual dimor- the frequency of undesired qualities. phism across species? Darwin’s theory of sexual selection was initially Darwin’s answer to these empirical puzzles was designed to explain the various empirical puzzles he the theory of sexual selection (Darwin, 1858, 1871). had observed – things like the brilliant plumage of The theory of sexual selection dealt with the evolu- peacocks (preferred by peahens) and the larger size tion of characteristics due to reproductive, rather of males in some species (explained by the advan- than survival, advantage. Darwin described two tage that size gives males in intrasexual competi- component processes through which sexual selec- tion). But many puzzles remained. Darwin observed tion could take place. In the first, called intrasexual that females were often the choosy sex (indeed, he competition, members of one sex (often, but not al- sometimes called the process of intersexual selec- ways, the males) engaged in competitive battles tion »female choice«), but he did not know why. He with each other. Two stags locking horns in combat also observed that males were often the competitive is a prototypical example of intrasexual competi- sex, but he did not know why. Roughly a century tion. The victors in these battles gain preferential would pass before evolutionary biologists devised a sexual access to females. The losers fail to mate. powerful theory to explain what determines which Whatever qualities lead to success in same-sex con- sex will compete and which sex will exercise tests, therefore, are passed down in greater numbers choice, that is, what drives the operation of the two (assuming that these qualities are heritable). What- component processes of sexual selection. ever qualities are linked with losing either fail to get Trivers’s (1972) answer to these questions was passed down or get passed down in fewer numbers. the theory of parental investment. According to this Evolution, that is change over time, occurs as a re- theory, the sex that invests more in offspring would sult of the differential reproduction of the winners be more choosy about mates. In species with inter- and losers in same-sex contests. nal female fertilization, the greater parental invest- It is important to note that intrasexual competi- ment by females makes them a valuable reproduc- tion need not always direct physical combat. Males tive resource. Gestating, bearing, and breast feeding in some species compete for position in the status a child, for example, are costly endeavors. Elemen- or dominance hierarchy through non-physical tary economics tells us that those who hold valuable means, and position in the hierarchy can be linked resources do not give them away indiscriminately. with preferential access to mates (e.g., Betzig, Evolution favored women who were highly selec- 1986). Males in other species scramble for access to tive about their mates. Women who were not choo- territory, and access to territory can be linked to sy would have suffered lower reproductive success. preferential access to mates. The key point is that Those who engaged in careful mate selection, pre- whatever qualities lead to success in intrasexual ferring for example a man who would stay around, competition are passed on in greater numbers, invest in her, and protect her children, enjoyed re- whether the competition is physical combat, ma- productive benefits. The more an organism channels neuvering for position in the hierarchy, or scramble effort into parental investment, according to Trivers, for access to certain resources. The result is evolu- the greater the benefits of exercising careful mate tion through sexual selection. choice. The sex that invests less in offspring, ac- The second process through which sexual selec- cording to this theory, should be more competitive tion occurs is intersexual selection. This process in- with each other for access to the high-investing sex. volves the preferences of members of one sex for In summary, the relative investment of the two sex- members of the opposite sex who possess certain es drives the operative components of sexual selec- qualities. Hypothetically, if all women preferred to tion, with the high investing sex being selected to mate with men who had red hair, those with red hair be the most discriminating and the lower investing would have a mating advantage. Over time, we sex being selected to be the most competitive with would witness an increase in the frequency of red- members of their own sex. SAMFUNDSØKONOMEN NR. 4 – 2002 48 Human Mating Strategies The Menu of Human Mating Strategies is not uncommon, for example, for a person to en- One of the intriguing features of human mating is gage in one long-term committed mateship with that it cannot be characterized by a singular strate- heavy investment in children, while simultaneously gy. One item on the menu is long-term committed pursuing an extramarital affair, or series of affairs, mating, often, but not always, characterized by a on the side. formal public commitment such as marriage. In Humans, in short, are neither solely monoga- long-term mating, both sexes typically invest heavi- mous, nor solely promiscuous; neither polygynous ly in any resultant offspring. As a consequence, and nor polyandrous. Which items on the menu of in accordance with the theory of parental invest- strategies a particular person chooses is heavily de- ment, sexual selection has likely fashioned in both pendent on contexts. These include the sex ratio in sexes high levels of choosiness or selectivity. Poor the mating pool, a person’s mate value, and even long-term mate choices would have been costly for prevailing cultural norms. These issues are briefly either sex, because they would have risked wasting discussed later, but first, we must outline the central their heavy investments. desires of men and women in their pursuit of long- Not all mating, however, lasts a lifetime. Human term and short-term mates. matings can last a few years, a few months, a few weeks, a few days, or even a few minutes. One end Qualities Desired in a Marriage Partner of this temporal continuum may be called short- Given that women have a large obligatory parental term mating. This temporal dimension turns out to investment to produce children, and hence are pre- be critical to many components of mating, perhaps dicted to be discriminating in their mate choice, the none more central than the qualities desired.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Buzzle – Zoology Terms – Glossary of Biology Terms and Definitions Http
    Buzzle – Zoology Terms – Glossary of Biology Terms and Definitions http://www.buzzle.com/articles/biology-terms-glossary-of-biology-terms-and- definitions.html#ZoologyGlossary Biology is the branch of science concerned with the study of life: structure, growth, functioning and evolution of living things. This discipline of science comprises three sub-disciplines that are botany (study of plants), Zoology (study of animals) and Microbiology (study of microorganisms). This vast subject of science involves the usage of myriads of biology terms, which are essential to be comprehended correctly. People involved in the science field encounter innumerable jargons during their study, research or work. Moreover, since science is a part of everybody's life, it is something that is important to all individuals. A Abdomen: Abdomen in mammals is the portion of the body which is located below the rib cage, and in arthropods below the thorax. It is the cavity that contains stomach, intestines, etc. Abscission: Abscission is a process of shedding or separating part of an organism from the rest of it. Common examples are that of, plant parts like leaves, fruits, flowers and bark being separated from the plant. Accidental: Accidental refers to the occurrences or existence of all those species that would not be found in a particular region under normal circumstances. Acclimation: Acclimation refers to the morphological and/or physiological changes experienced by various organisms to adapt or accustom themselves to a new climate or environment. Active Transport: The movement of cellular substances like ions or molecules by traveling across the membrane, towards a higher level of concentration while consuming energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tie-Up Cycles in Long-Term Mating. Part I: Theory
    challenges Article Tie-Up Cycles in Long-Term Mating. Part I: Theory Lorenza Lucchi Basili 1,† and Pier Luigi Sacco 2,3,*,† 1 Independent Researcher, 20 Chestnut Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Romance Languages and Literatures, Harvard University, Boylston Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3 Department of Comparative Literature and Language Sciences, IULM University, via Carlo Bo, 1, Milan 20143, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-617-496-0486 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Academic Editor: Palmiro Poltronieri Received: 26 February 2016; Accepted: 26 April 2016; Published: 3 May 2016 Abstract: In this paper, we propose a new approach to couple formation and dynamics that abridges findings from sexual strategies theory and attachment theory to develop a framework where the sexual and emotional aspects of mating are considered in their strategic interaction. Our approach presents several testable implications, some of which find interesting correspondences in the existing literature. Our main result is that, according to our approach, there are six typical dynamic interaction patterns that are more or less conducive to the formation of a stable couple, and that set out an interesting typology for the analysis of real (as well as fictional, as we will see in the second part of the paper) mating behaviors and dynamics. Keywords: sexual strategies; emotional attachment; mating; couple formation and dynamics; Tie-Up; Active vs. Receptive Areas; frustration and reward; Tie-Up Cycle; flow inversion 1. Introduction The process of reproductive mating is a clear example of a complex socio-biological phenomenon, of paramount evolutionary importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Theory Throughout the Text)
    Author Bios: Jon A. Sefcek, MA, Barbara H. Brumbach, MA, Geneva Vasquez, MA, are PhD students in the Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Geoffrey F. Miller, PhD, is Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. Address correspondence to Jon A. Sefcek at [email protected] The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mate Choice: How Ecology, Genes, Fertility, and Fashion Influence Mating Behavior Jon A. Sefcek, MA, Barbara H. Brumbach, MA, Geneva Vasquez, MA, and Geoffrey F. Miller, PhD The recent incorporation of sexual selection theories into the rubric of Evolutionary Psychology has produced an important framework from which to examine human mating behavior. Here we review the extant empirical and theoretical work regarding heterosexual human mating preferences and reproductive strategies. Initially, we review contemporary Evolutionary Psychology’s adaptationism, including the incorporation of modern theories of sexual selection, adaptive genetic variation, and mate choice. Next, we examine women’s and men’s mating preferences focusing on the adaptive significance of material, genetic and fertility benefits, and their relationship to environmental characteristics. Following this, we consider human mate choice in relation to non-adaptive preferences. This discussion ends with a look at context effects for individual differences in mate-preferences and reproductive strategies. KEY WORDS: Sexual selection, fitness indicators, mate choice, mating preferences, mating strategies, parental investment From colorful birds and dancing bees to Sinatra’s crooning, Betty Davis’s eyes, and Monty Python’s satires, various phenotypic traits serve as signals to others. Aposematism (warning coloration) in butterflies, for example, cautions predators that the butterfly is poisonous (Joron, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Aging and Mating: the Ticking of the Biological Clock in Female Cockroaches
    Reproductive aging and mating: The ticking of the biological clock in female cockroaches Patricia J. Moore* and Allen J. Moore School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom Edited by David B. Wake, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved June 5, 2001 (received for review March 30, 2001) Females are expected to have different mating preferences be- reproductive state? Few empirical studies have addressed cause of the variation in costs and benefits of mate choice both these questions. Lea et al. (15) present evidence that the between females and within individual females over a lifetime. consistency of mate preference in midwife toads, presumably Workers have begun to look for, and find, the expected variation reflecting a high motivation to mate, is greatest in ovulating among females in expressed mating preferences. However, vari- females. Kodric-Brown and Nicoletto (16) find that older ation within females caused by changes in intrinsic influences has female guppies are less choosy than when they are younger not been examined in detail. Here we show that reproductive even if still virgin. Likewise, Gray (17) demonstrated that older aging caused by delayed mating resulted in reduced choosiness by female house crickets show no significant preference for the female Nauphoeta cinerea, a cockroach that has reproductive calls of attractive males compared with young females. cycles and gives live birth. Male willingness to mate was unaf- An essential factor in considering the effect of reproductive fected by variation in female age. Females who were beyond the state on the expression of female mate choice is to show that in optimal mating age, 6 days postadult molt, required considerably fact there is variation in the costs associated with mate choice less courtship than their younger counterparts.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtship & Mating Reproduction in Insects
    Reproduction Courtship & Mating in Insects • How do the sexes find each other? – Light – Swarming (male only/ female only) – Leks (male aggregations) • Defend territory against males • Court arriving females – Pheromones What do they do once they find each other? Courtship • Close range intersexual behavior that induces sexual receptivity before and during mating. • Allows mate choice among and within species. 1 Types of Courtship • Visual displays Nuptial Gifts • Ritualized movements • 3 forms • Sound production – Cannibalization of males • Tactile stimulation – Glandular product • Nuptial gifts – Nuptial gift • Prey • Salt, nutrients Evolution of nuptial feeding Sexual Cannibalization • Female advantages • Rather extreme – Nutritional benefit • Male actually does not – Mate choice (mate with good provider) willingly give himself • Male advantages up… – Helping provision/produce his offspring – Where would its potential – Female returns sperm while feeding rather than reproductive benefit be? mating with someone else • Do females have • Male costs increased reproductive – Capturing food costs energy and incurs predation success? risk – Prey can be stolen and used by another male. 2 Glandular gifts Nuptial gifts • Often part of the spermatophore (sperm transfer unit) – Occupy female while sperm is being transferred – Parental investment by male • Generally a food item (usually prey) • Also regurgitations (some flies) • But beware the Cubic Zirconia, ladies Sexual selection Types of sexual selection • Intrasexual selection – Contest competition
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection
    Sexual Selection Carol E. Lee University of Wisconsin Copyright ©2020 Do not upload without permission Natural Selection Evolutionary Mechanisms Genetic Drift Migration Non-adaptive Mutations Natural Selection Adaptive OUTLINE (1) Sexual Selection (2) Constraints on Natural Selection Pleiotropy Evolutionary Tradeoffs Genetic Drift and Natural Selection ■ There are species with 3 or more sexes (some ciliates have 32)... Too complex to discuss here ■ Restrict my discussion here to 2 sexes Male Female Male Female Male Female HUH???? What about us??? (New World Monkeys) Theory of Sexual Selection ■ The sex bearing a higher cost to reproduction or has higher parental investment will generally be the chooser (has more to lose from bad choice) ■ Whereas the sex bearing the lesser cost of reproduction or parental investment generally competes more heavily for mates (Bateman 1948) Asymmetric Limits on Fitness • The sex that has higher reproductive cost will be the choosers • If you’re allocating a lot of resources toward offspring and are limited in the number of offspring you can have, you won’t mate with just anyone • The sex that is being selected (under sexual selection) will be competitive • Fight with each other, fight for resources, fight for access to or control of the other sex Theory of Sexual Selection ■ In sexual species, it is usually males who invest less in each offspring à it is typical for males to compete for access to females ■ In 90% of mammal species, females provide substantial parental care, while males provide little or
    [Show full text]
  • Variance in the Male Reproductive Success of Western Gorillas: Acquiring Females Is Just the Beginning
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2010) 64:515–528 DOI 10.1007/s00265-009-0867-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Variance in the male reproductive success of western gorillas: acquiring females is just the beginning Thomas Breuer & Andrew M. Robbins & Claudia Olejniczak & Richard J. Parnell & Emma J. Stokes & Martha M. Robbins Received: 26 April 2009 /Revised: 17 September 2009 /Accepted: 18 September 2009 /Published online: 14 October 2009 # Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract Variance in male reproductive success is that enhance offspring survival. Thus, this study illustrates expected to be high in sexually dimorphic mammals, even how a detailed analysis of the components of male when it is modulated by the costs and benefits of group reproductive success can shed light on the interrelated living. Here, we investigate the variance in reproductive social and ecological aspects that affect it. success of male western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla), a highly dimorphic primate with long-term male–female associa- Keywords Harem size . Intrasexual competition . tions, using 12.5 years of data collected at Mbeli Bai in Mating success . Offspring survival . northern Congo. Access to mates and offspring survival Variance in reproductive success were both major sources of variance in male reproductive success. Males with larger harems had lower offspring mortality with no apparent reduction in female fertility or Introduction observed tenure length, so the size of harems did not seem to be limited by female feeding competition or by the risk High variance in male reproductive success is assumed to of takeovers and infanticide by outsider males. The lower provide a potential for sexual selection that can lead to mortality in larger harems may reflect improved vigilance sexual dimorphism (Darwin 1871; Andersson 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2000) 23, 573–644 Printed in the United States of America The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism Steven W. Gangestad Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 [email protected] Jeffry A. Simpson Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 [email protected]. Abstract: During human evolutionary history, there were “trade-offs” between expending time and energy on child-rearing and mating, so both men and women evolved conditional mating strategies guided by cues signaling the circumstances. Many short-term matings might be successful for some men; others might try to find and keep a single mate, investing their effort in rearing her offspring. Recent evidence suggests that men with features signaling genetic benefits to offspring should be preferred by women as short-term mates, but there are trade-offs between a mate’s genetic fitness and his willingness to help in child-rearing. It is these circumstances and the cues that signal them that underlie the variation in short- and long-term mating strategies between and within the sexes. Keywords: conditional strategies; evolutionary psychology; fluctuating asymmetry; mating; reproductive strategies; sexual selection Research on interpersonal relationships, especially roman- attributes (e.g., physical attractiveness) tend to assume tic ones, has increased markedly in the last three decades greater importance in mating relationships than in other (see Berscheid & Reis 1998) across a variety of fields, in- types of relationships (Buss 1989; Gangestad & Buss 1993 cluding social psychology, anthropology, ethology, sociol- [see also Kenrick & Keefe: “Age Preferences in Mates Re- ogy, developmental psychology, and personology (Ber- flect Sex Differences in Human Reproductive Strategies” scheid 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing the Highest Hurdle: Human-Based Case Studies Broaden Students’ Knowledge of Core Evolutionary Concepts
    The Journal of Effective Teaching an online journal devoted to teaching excellence Clearing the highest hurdle: Human-based case studies broaden students’ knowledge of core evolutionary concepts Alexander J. Werth1 Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943 Abstract An anonymous survey instrument was used for a ten year study to gauge college student attitudes toward evolution. Results indicate that students are most likely to accept evolu- tion as a historical process for change in physical features of non-human organisms. They are less likely to accept evolution as an ongoing process that shapes all traits (including biochemical, physiological, and behavioral) in humans. Students who fail to accept the factual nature of human evolution do not gain an accurate view of evolution, let alone modern biology. Fortunately, because of students’ natural curiosity about their bodies and related topics (e.g., medicine, vestigial features, human prehistory), a pedagogical focus on human evolution provides a fun and effective way to teach core evolutionary concepts, as quantified by the survey. Results of the study are presented along with useful case studies involving human evolution. Keywords: Survey, pedagogy, biology, evolution, Darwin. All science educators face pedagogical difficulties, but when considering the social rami- fications of scientific ideas, few face as great a challenge as biology teachers. Studies consistently show more than half of Americans reject any concept of biological evolution (Harris Poll, 2005, Miller et al., 2006). Students embody just such a cross-section of soci- ety. Much ink has been spilled explaining how best to teach evolution, particularly to unwilling students (Cavallo and McCall, 2008, Nelson, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection
    Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY REPRODUCTION & SEXUAL SELECTION • Asexual • Sexual – Attraction, Courtship, and Mating – Fertilization – Production of Young The Evolutionary Enigma of Benefits of Asex Sexual Reproduction • Sexual reproduction produces fewer reproductive offspring than asexual reproduction, a so-called reproductive handicap 1. Eliminate problem to locate, court, & retain suitable mate. Asexual reproduction Sexual reproduction Generation 1 2. Doubles population growth rate. Female Female 3. Avoid “cost of meiosis”: Generation 2 – genetic representation in later generations isn't reduced by half each time Male 4. Preserve gene pool adapted to local Generation 3 conditions. Generation 4 Figure 23.16 The Energetic Costs of Sexual Reproduction Benefits of Sex • Allocation of Resources 1. Reinforcement of social structure 2. Variability in face of changing environment. – why buy four lottery tickets w/ the same number on them? Relative benefits: Support from organisms both asexual in constant & sexual in changing environments – aphids have wingless female clones & winged male & female dispersers – ciliates conjugate if environment is deteriorating Heyer 1 Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection Simultaneous Hermaphrodites TWO SEXES • Advantageous if limited mobility and sperm dispersal and/or low population density • Guarantee that any member of your species encountered is the • Conjugation “right” sex • Self fertilization still provides some genetic variation – Ciliate protozoans with + & - mating
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Preferences Might Evolve by Natural Selection. If Mating Mate
    A GENERAL MODEL OF SEXUAL AND NATURAL SELECTION P. O'DONALD Department of Zoology, University College of North Wales, bangor Received28.xii.66 1.INTRODUCTION FISHERin The Genetical Theory of JVatural Selection (1930) described how mating preferences might evolve by natural selection. If mating behaviour varies among different genotypes, some individuals may have an hereditary disposition to mate with others having particular characteristics. Usually of course it is the females who choose the males and their choice is determined by the likelihood that the males' display will release their mating responses. If some females prefer to mate with those males that have characteristics advantageous in natural selection, then the genotypes that determine such matings will also be selected: the offspring will carry both the advantageous geno- types and the genotypes of the mating preference. Once the mating preference is established, it will itself add to the selective advantage of the preferred genotypes: a "runaway process" as Fisher called it develops. In a paper in Heredity (1963) I described a mathematical model of this type of selection. In the simplest case two loci must be involved: one locus determines the preferred character and the other the mating preference. If there are only two alleles segregating at each locus, ten different genotypes can occur if the loci are linked and nine if they are not. If they are sex-linked, there are i possible genotypes. I derived finite difference equations giving the frequencies of the genotypes in terms of parameters describing the degree of dominance of the preferred genotypes and the recombination fractions of the loci.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Aggression Using Domains of Self-Esteem: Direct and Indirect Aggression in Males and Females As a Function of Domain-Specific Self-Esteem
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2005 Predicting Aggression using Domains of Self-Esteem: Direct and Indirect Aggression in Males and Females as a Function of Domain-Specific Self-Esteem Carolyn Randolph Hodges College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Personality and Social Contexts Commons Recommended Citation Hodges, Carolyn Randolph, "Predicting Aggression using Domains of Self-Esteem: Direct and Indirect Aggression in Males and Females as a Function of Domain-Specific Self-Esteem" (2005). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626503. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-n8rk-cv72 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PREDICTING AGGRESSION USING DOMAINS OF SELF-ESTEEM Direct and Indirect Aggression in Males and Females As a Function of Domain-Specific Self-Esteem A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Psychology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Carolyn Randolph Hodges 2005 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 'Rand! lodges Approved by the Committee, July 2005 Lee A Kirkpatrick, PhD ’ennifei'A Stevens, PhD Todd M.
    [Show full text]