DOCSLIB.ORG

Arkeologin I Regimens Tjänst

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arkeologin I Regimens Tjänst Arkeologin i regimens tjänst -Ahnenerbes verksamhet, historiebruk och vetenskap under det Tredje riket- Uppsats Arkeologi C Högskolan på Gotland Vårterminen 2009 Författare: Mattias Johansson Handledare: Martin Hansson HÖGSKOLAN PÅ GOTLAND ARKEOLOGI C 2(35) Mattias Johansson 2010/01/28 Johansson, Mattias 2009. Arkeologin i regimens tjänst -Ahnenerbes verksamhet, historiebruk och vetenskap under det Tredje riket (Archeology in service of the regime - Ahnenerbe operations, practice of history and science during the Third Reich) Abstract In order to study how science and archeology was exploited for political means during the Third Reich this thesis investigates the scientific institute Ahnenerbe, founded in 1935. The thesis is built up as a literature study combining literature sources from the time of the event as well as research done around Ahnenerbe after the war. The purpose of the thesis is to examine the official and unofficial purposes of the organisation. It investigates how scholars viewed Ahnenerbe at the time, and after the war. It further examines the scientific value of the material published by the organisation, where there is a specific focus on the material covering Germanic Männerbunds. Keywords: Ahnenerbe, Herbert Jankuhn, Herman Wirth, Walther Wüst, Wolfram Sievers, Männerbund, Aryans, Amt Rosenberg HÖGSKOLAN PÅ GOTLAND ARKEOLOGI C 3(35) Mattias Johansson 2010/01/28 1 Inledning .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Introduktion ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Syfte och frågeställning .................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Källmaterial och avgränsning ........................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Källkritik .................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Metod och teori ................................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Tidigare forskning ............................................................................................................. 6 2 Bakgrund .................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Nationalsocialism .............................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Begreppet arier ideologins bärare ..................................................................................... 8 2.3 Vetenskap som politiskt verktyg ....................................................................................... 8 2.4 Amt Rosenberg ................................................................................................................. 9 3 Presentation av materialet ...................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Ahnenerbe ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Finansiering .............................................................................................................. 11 3.1.2 Ledande personer inom Ahnenerbe .......................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Ahnenerbes genomförda expeditioner ..................................................................... 12 3.1.3.1 Bohuslän och Norge .......................................................................................... 12 3.1.3.2 Tyskland ............................................................................................................ 13 3.1.3.3 Mellanöstern ...................................................................................................... 14 3.1.3.4 Karelens folklore .............................................................................................. 14 3.1.3.5 Polen .................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.3.6 Tibet .................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.3.7 Krim .................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.3.8 Italien ................................................................................................................ 16 3.1.3.9 Bayeux tapeten, Frankrike ................................................................................ 16 3.1.4 Ahnenerbes planerade expeditioner ......................................................................... 16 3.1.4.1 Island ................................................................................................................. 16 3.1.4.2 Bolivia ............................................................................................................... 16 3.1.4.3 Kanarieöarna ..................................................................................................... 17 3.1.4.4 Iran, inskriptionerna i Behistun ......................................................................... 17 3.1.4.5 Ahnenerbe vid krigsutbrottet ............................................................................. 17 3.2 Germanska mannaförbund .............................................................................................. 17 3.2.1 Forntida germanska mannaförbund ......................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Moderna germanska mannaförbund uppstår ............................................................ 18 4 Analys av materialet ............................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Ahnenerbe, struktur, syfte och mål ................................................................................. 18 4.1.1 Ersättande av kristendomen, ett inofficiellt syfte ..................................................... 19 4.1.2 Hitlers inställning till Ahnenerbe ............................................................................. 19 4.2 Ahnenerbes vetenskapliga verksamhet utifrån fyra definitioner av historiebruk ........... 20 4.3 Politikens inverkan på vetenskapen ................................................................................ 20 4.4 Vad attraherade forskarna till Ahnenerbe? ...................................................................... 21 4.5 Samtida kritik .................................................................................................................. 22 4.6 Efterkrigstidens kritik ..................................................................................................... 22 4.6.1 Varför tystnad i Tyskland ......................................................................................... 23 4.7 Vad var vetenskapen bakom mannaförbundstanken? ..................................................... 23 4.7.1 Mannaförbunden väl anpassade för det Nazistiska statsbygget ............................... 24 4.7.2 Kritik kring forskning om Germanska mannaförbund ............................................. 24 4.8 Vad var det vetenskapliga fundamentet bakom begreppet arier? .................................... 24 HÖGSKOLAN PÅ GOTLAND ARKEOLOGI C 4(35) Mattias Johansson 2010/01/28 4.9 Det vetenskapliga värdet i Ahnenerbes expeditioner ...................................................... 25 5 Slutsatser och avslutande diskussion ..................................................................................... 26 5.1.1 Ahnenerbes skuld? ................................................................................................... 26 5.1.2 Bedömning av Ahnenerbe och dess vetenskapliga arv ............................................ 27 5.1.3 Relationen mellan vetenskap och politik ................................................................. 27 6 Sammanfattning ..................................................................................................................... 28 7 Referenser .............................................................................................................................. 29 7.1 Skriftliga källor ............................................................................................................... 29 7.2 Digitala källor ................................................................................................................. 31 8 Bilagor .................................................................................................................................... 32 8.1 Bildmaterial ..................................................................................................................... 32 8.2 Institut inom Ahnenerbe .................................................................................................. 33 8.2.1 Humaniora ................................................................................................................ 33 8.2.2 Naturvetenskap ......................................................................................................... 34 1 Inledning 1.1 Introduktion Arkeologin som vetenskap är en relativt ung vetenskap som i princip hade sin vagga i upplysningstiden men som på allvar växte fram och etablerades
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inscribed 6 (2).Pdf
    Inscribed6 CONTENTS 1 1. AVIATION 33 2. MILITARY 59 3. NAVAL 67 4. ROYALTY, POLITICIANS, AND OTHER PUBLIC FIGURES 180 5. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 195 6. HIGH LATITUDES, INCLUDING THE POLES 206 7. MOUNTAINEERING 211 8. SPACE EXPLORATION 214 9. GENERAL TRAVEL SECTION 1. AVIATION including books from the libraries of Douglas Bader and “Laddie” Lucas. 1. [AITKEN (Group Captain Sir Max)]. LARIOS (Captain José, Duke of Lerma). Combat over Spain. Memoirs of a Nationalist Fighter Pilot 1936–1939. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition. 8vo., cloth, pictorial dust jacket. London, Neville Spearman. nd (1966). £80 A presentation copy, inscribed on the half title page ‘To Group Captain Sir Max AitkenDFC. DSO. Let us pray that the high ideals we fought for, with such fervent enthusiasm and sacrifice, may never be allowed to perish or be forgotten. With my warmest regards. Pepito Lerma. May 1968’. From the dust jacket: ‘“Combat over Spain” is one of the few first-hand accounts of the Spanish Civil War, and is the only one published in England to be written from the Nationalist point of view’. Lerma was a bomber and fighter pilot for the duration of the war, flying 278 missions. Aitken, the son of Lord Beaverbrook, joined the RAFVR in 1935, and flew Blenheims and Hurricanes, shooting down 14 enemy aircraft. Dust jacket just creased at the head and tail of the spine. A formidable Vic formation – Bader, Deere, Malan. 2. [BADER (Group Captain Douglas)]. DEERE (Group Captain Alan C.) DOWDING Air Chief Marshal, Lord), foreword. Nine Lives. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrumentalising the Past: the Germanic Myth in National Socialist Context
    RJHI 1 (1) 2014 Instrumentalising the Past: The Germanic Myth in National Socialist Context Irina-Maria Manea * Abstract : In the search for an explanatory model for the present or even more, for a fundament for national identity, many old traditions were rediscovered and reutilized according to contemporary desires. In the case of Germany, a forever politically fragmented space, justifying unity was all the more important, especially beginning with the 19 th century when it had a real chance to establish itself as a state. Then, beyond nationalism and romanticism, at the dawn of the Third Reich, the myth of a unified, powerful, pure people with a tradition dating since time immemorial became almost a rule in an ideology that attempted to go back to the past and select those elements which could have ensured a historical basis for the regime. In this study, we will attempt to focus on two important aspects of this type of instrumentalisation. The focus of the discussion is mainly Tacitus’ Germania, a work which has been forever invoked in all sorts of contexts as a means to discover the ancient Germans and create a link to the modern ones, but in the same time the main beliefs in the realm of history and archaeology are underlined, so as to catch a better glimpse of how the regime has been instrumentalising and overinterpreting highly controversial facts. Keywords : Tacitus, Germania, myth, National Socialism, Germany, Kossinna, cultural-historical archaeology, ideology, totalitarianism, falsifying history During the twentieth century, Tacitus’ famous work Germania was massively instrumentalised by the Nazi regime, in order to strengthen nationalism and help Germany gain an aura of eternal glory.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case-Study of the German Archaeologist Herbert Jankuhn (1905-1990)
    Science and Service in the National Socialist State: A Case-Study of the German Archaeologist Herbert Jankuhn (1905-1990) by Monika Elisabeth Steinel UCL This thesis is submitted for examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) January 2009 DECLARATION I, Monika Elisabeth Steinel, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. January 2009 2 ABSTRACT The thesis investigates the relationship between archaeology, politics and ideology through a case-study of the prominent German archaeologist Herbert Jankuhn (1905- 1990). It addresses the following questions: what role do archaeological scholars assume in a totalitarian state’s organisational structures, and what may motivate them to do so? To what extent and how are archaeologists and their scientific work influenced by the political and ideological context in which they perform, and do they play a role in generating and/or perpetuating ideologies? The thesis investigates the nature and extent of Jankuhn's practical involvement in National Socialist hierarchical structures, and offers a thematically structured analysis of Jankuhn's archaeological writings that juxtaposes the work produced during and after the National Socialist period. It investigates selected components of Herbert Jankuhn's research interests and methodological approaches, examines his representations of Germanic/German pre- and protohistory and explores his adapting interpretations of the early medieval site of Haithabu in northern Germany. The dissertation demonstrates that a scholar’s adaptation to political and ideological circumstances is not necessarily straightforward or absolute. As a member of the Schutzstaffel, Jankuhn actively advanced National Socialist ideological preconceptions and military aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of Identity – Archäologie Der Identität Österreichische Akademie Der Wissenschaften Philosophisch-Historische Klasse Denkschriften, 406
    WALTER POHL/MATHIAS MEHOFER (HG.) ARCHAEOLOGY OF IDENTITY – ARCHÄOLOGIE DER IDENTITÄT ÖSTERREICHISCHE AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN PHILOSOPHISCH-HISTORISCHE KLASSE DENKSCHRIFTEN, 406. BAND FORSCHUNGEN ZUR GESCHICHTE DES MITTELALTERS BAND 17 HERAUSGEGEBEN VOM INSTITUT FÜR MITTELALTERFORSCHUNG ÖSTERREICHISCHE AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN PHILOSOPHISCH-HISTORISCHE KLASSE DENKSCHRIFTEN, 406. BAND FORSCHUNGEN ZUR GESCHICHTE DES MITTELALTERS BAND 17 Archaeology of Identity – Archäologie der Identität HERAUSGEGEBEN VON WALTER POHL / MATHIAS MEHOFER Vorgelegt von w. M. WALTER POHL in der Sitzung am 20.Juni 2008 Gedruckt mit Unterstützung durch den Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung Umschlaggestaltung: Dagmar Giesriegl British Library Cataloguing in Publication data A Catalogue record of this book is available from the British Library Die verwendete Papiersorte ist aus chlorfrei gebleichtem Zellstoff hergestellt, frei von säurebildenden Bestandteilen und alterungsbeständig. Alle Rechte vorbehalten ISBN 978-3-7001-6502-6 Copyright © 2010 by Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien Satz und Layout: Gerald Reisenbauer, ÖAW Druck und Bindung: Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., A-3580 Horn Printed and bound in the EU http://hw.oeaw.ac.at/6502-6 http://verlag.oeaw.ac.at C SANÁD BÁLINT A contribution to research on ethnicity: a view from and on the east THE STATE OF RESEARCH The results of modern research on ethnicity have not yet reached specialists of the early medieval Eurasian steppe in Eastern Europe (nor have the results of the latter reached the former). This has many reasons. First the most obvious: many of these publications remain unknown to Central and East European scholars either due to fi nancial reasons or the lack of connections or knowledge of languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Discourse and Politics in German and Swedish Archaeology 1900-1950'
    Kossinna, the Nol"dische Gedanke, and Swedish Archaeology Discourse and politics in German and Swedish archaeology 1900-1950' Per Cornell, Ulf Borelius, Dan Kresa & Thomas Backlund This article looks at the relation between Swedish and German archaeology in the first half of the 20'" century. In particular, the focus is on the question why Swedish prehistorians came to accept the archaeology of Gustaf Kossinna. Thc methodological inspiration principally comes from Carlo Ginzburg and his idea of clucs. The empirical material mainly consists of books and journals. Newspapers and archives have also been used, but to a much lesser cxtent. Gustaf Kossinna was the dominant archaeologist in Germany in the early 20'" ccntury. The Siedliuigsarchä ologie was to a large extent his creation, and he was instrumental in making a spatial tum in archaeology. Kossinna was part of the Nordische Gedanke movement. Thus, the Nordic/Germanic blood, earth, and soil were paramount to Kossinnian archaeology. It was so important that Kossinna thought only Europe, in particular the Nordic region, which to him included parts of Germany, should be subjectcd to archaeological investigations. At the tum of the 20'" ccntury, Swedish archaeology was dominated by Oscar Monte- lius and his chronological typology. In the 1910s, however, his position was challcngcd by proponents of a more spatially oriented archaeology. Among thc opponents werc two young archaeologists, Nils Åberg and Sune Lindquist, who both had participated in the archaeological seminar organiscd by Knut Stjerna. In different ways, Åberg and Lindquist used Kossinna's archaeology in thc struggle against the Montelian dominance. Pet Cotrnel/, lust föi.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointment in Berlin
    10880 Hale_01.qxd 9/4/03 12:04 PM Page 1 PRELUDE APPOINTMENT IN BERLIN ‘If the fate [of the Nazis] lay in my hands . I would have all the intellectuals strung up, and the professors three feet higher than the rest; they would be left hanging from the lamp-posts for as long as was compatible with hygiene.’ – German-Jewish diarist Victor Klemperer, writing in August 1936 AT THE BEGINNING OF 1939, ADOLF HITLER UNVEILED HIS NEW REICHS Chancellery building in Berlin. It had been designed and built by the Führer’s protégé Albert Speer with ruthless speed, and completed, as Hitler had demanded, in less than a year. Speer promised that the new building would last a millennium, at least. Hitler was very clear about what the Chancellery had to achieve. Anyone who stepped through its soaring marble portals and gazed along its gleaming, interminable mar- ble corridors would understand instantly that they were in the presence of a Master Race destined to rule for a thousand years. Knowing that, Hitler said, they would ‘shiver and shake’. A mere six years later, the Chancellery lay in ruins; Hitler’s own charred remains smouldered nearby. Just as its millions of victims had, in Paul Celan’s words, ‘risen to the air as smoke’, the Third Reich was rubble and ashes. The Tausend-Jahr-Reich had lasted a mere twelve years and three months. At the beginning of another century, the leaden sky over Berlin is backdrop to a steel forest of cranes. Beneath their restlessly signalling arms, a new German capital is being conjured from concrete, marble, glass and steel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Past As Propaganda: Totalitarian Archaeology in Nazi Germany
    The past as propaganda: totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany BETTINA ARNOLD* An important element to the future of archaeology in the ex-Communist countries of central Europe will be the freeing of archaeological ideas from the constraints of a particular set of social theories built into the fabric of the state, CIS Milisauskas noted in the last Ax’rJQLvTY (64: 283-5). This is a timely moment to look at the interference of a different set of social theories in the same region some decades ago. After almost six decades, there is no term Vorgeschichte (prehistory)was rejected as comprehensive account by a German-speaking a survival of anthropological thinking; Urge- prehistorian of the effects on prehistoric scho- schichte (early history) was preferred as better larship of the National Socialist regime, or the emphasizing the continuity of prehistory with Isle played by archaeology in legitimating it. documentary history (Sklenar 1983: 132). The This paper addresses the following questions: writings of the 19th-century French racial What were the foundations of German prehis- philosopher Gobineau provided a doctrine of toric research under the National Socialists the inequality of different races (Daniel & Ken- (NS)? What role did prehistory play in the frew 1988: 104-6). Journals and publications process of political legitimation from 1933 to dealing with the subject of race and genetic 1945? What did the NS system offer to prehis- engineering increasingly appeared in Germany torians in exchange for their part in this legiti- in the early 20th century, among them Volk und mation process? What was the official Party Hasse, which was founded in 1926, and policy regarding prehistoric archaeology? What Fortschritte der Erbpathologie und HC~SS~JI- was the response of the discipline to this hygiene, founded in 1929.
    [Show full text]
  • “More Important Than All Technical Features Would Appear to Us the 'Volkliche' Differences”. Gotthard Neumann And
    Fabian Link “More Important than all Technical Features Would Appear to Us the volkliche Differences”.Gotthard Neumann and the völkisch Thought in German Prehistory, 1920s to 1960s Summary This paper examines the theoretical and methodological value of combining Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history) with Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of habitus and social field by focusing on definitions of the völkisch thought in German prehistory. The theoretical perspective in this paper is that concepts on the semantic level are interlinked with historical processes in the social space, or the scientific field in this example. On the one hand, it is evident that völkisch elements belonged intrinsically to prehistoric archaeology in its development as an autonomous discipline in the scientific field. On the other hand, racist and völkisch thoughts were a result of the heteronomization that was enforced during the Nazi regime, when pre- historic archaeologists tried to use the Nazis to establish their discipline in academia. Keywords: Habitus- and field-theory; Begriffsgeschichte; völkisch thought; prehistory; Nazi regime. In diesem Artikel frage ich nach der theoretischen und methodologischen Tragweite einer Kombination von Begriffsgeschichte und Pierre Bourdieus Habitus- und Feldtheorie. Der Ansatz wird am Beispiel eines Definitionsversuchs völkischen Denkens in der deutschen Prähistorie ausgelotet. In dieser theoretischen Perspektive sind Denkhaltungen auf der se- mantischen Ebene mit historischen Ereignissen und Prozessen im sozialen Raum, das heißt in diesem Fall im wissenschatlichen Feld, verknüpt. Auf der einen Seite kann dadurch ge- zeigt werden, dass völkische Elemente zur Entwicklung der prähistorischen Archäologie als selbständiges Forschungsfeld gehörten. Auf der anderen Seite wird deutlich, dass rassis- tisches und völkisches Denken das Resultat einer Heteronomisierung der Prähistorie war, die sich während des NS-Regimes massiv verstärkte, als deutsche Prähistoriker versuchten, mit Hilfe einer Zusammenarbeit mit NS-Politikern ihren Forschungsbereich akademisch zu etablieren.
    [Show full text]
  • The Master Plan: Himmler's Scholars and the Holocaust Heather Pringle
    1 The Master Plan: Himmler’s Scholars and the Holocaust Heather Pringle Chapter 1: Foreign Affairs 1. What was the Ahnenerbe? Who founded it and why did they do it? 2. The Ahnenerbe engaged in what sorts of activities? Chapter 2: The Reader 1. What was Heinrich Himmler like as a person? 2. What was Heinrich Himmler’s family background? Describe the relationship between Heinrich Himmler and his father Gebhard and how it affected his education and his politics. 3. How did Himmler come into contact with the Nazi party? Why was he attracted to the Nazi movement and how did he begin to move up in the organization? Terms (definition and significance): o Tacitus o Nibelungenlied o Houston Steward Chamberlain Chapter 3: Aryans 1. Describe the history of the concept of “race.” How did the nature of the concept of “race” help the Nazis? 2 2. Describe the evolution of Aryanism from the mid-eighteenth century to the 1920s. Terms (definition and significance): o James Parsons o Sir William Jones o Fredrich Schlegel o Theodor Benfey o Nordic Race o Hans F. K. Günther Chapter 4: Death’s-Head 1. How did Heinrich Himmler become the head of the SS and how did he transform that organization? 2. What did the Artamanen and Richard Walther Darré contribute to Himmler’s plans to transform the SS and Germany society? 3. How did Himmler conduct racial classification and how did he match the Aryan ideals himself? 4. What was the purpose of the “education offensive” and how was it conducted? Terms (definition and significance): o RuSHA o SS-Leitheft o Nordic Academy o Karl-Maria Wiligut o Weisthor o Wewelburg Chapter 5: Making Stones Speak 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Secrets: an Occult Breach in the Fabric of History
    CONTENTS Title Copyright INTRODUCTION HISTORICAL ODDITIES Non-Whites & Jews in the German Army Spring of Life and Baby Abductions Lake Toplitz: the Nazi Abyss Werewolves The Underground Reich Wonder Weapons NAZI OCCULTISM The Hollow Earth Theory World Ice Theory Neuschwabenland The Ahnenerbe The Wewelsburg Hexen Files Hitler and Magic Wotan and the Aryan Archetype POST-WAR MYTHS The Morning of the Magicians Hitler’s Death The Mystic Treasure of the SS Fantasy Wonder Weapons The Genocide Nazism Becomes a Semi-Religious Movement The Black Sun The Vril EPILOGUE PICTURE CREDITS 2 NAZI SECRETS An Occult Breach in the Fabric of History Revised and Augmented Edition Frank Lost 3 Updated facts about Nazi Secrets and new books at: www.euromyst.com Copyright © 2013 Frank Lost All rights reserved. 4 INTRODUCTION Sometimes reality can be stranger than fiction. It is therefore unnecessary to add more fantasies to the genuine historical facts in the field of Nazi occultism, especially when it comes to their weird expeditions and their pseudo-scientific researches. The true amateur of sensational and strange stories can still be fully satisfied with Himmler's Witch Project, or the Hollow Earth Theory, or the various moons of the World Ice Theory that fell on our planet and drowned the Atlanteans. This is real history and some high-ranking Nazis did believe in these theories, no matter how sensational they may sound to modern ears. It does not add anything to the uncanny spell of such stories to pollute them with material that cannot be verified or, even worse, with pure lies coming straight out of the imagination of poor authors in search of quick money and fame.
    [Show full text]
  • Prähistorie Im Nationalsozialismus
    Universität Konstanz Fachbereich Geschichte und Soziologie Prähistorie im Nationalsozialismus: Ein Vergleich der Schriften von Herbert Jankuhn und Hans Reinerth zwischen 1933 und 1939 Magisterarbeit im Fach Geschichte vorgelegt von: Katharina Krall Annenesch 22 88639 Wald Tel.: 07578/933390 E-Mail: [email protected] 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Lothar Burchardt 2. Gutachter: Dr. Kai Trampedach Konstanz, Mai 2005 Inhaltsverzeichnis Inhaltsverzeichnis: I. Einleitung..................................................................................................................3 1. Kurzer Überblick.............................................................................................................3 2. Stand der Forschung .......................................................................................................4 2.1. Der Umgang mit der Thematik nach 1945............................................................................ 4 2.2. Meinungen und Thesen zur Thematik................................................................................... 7 3. Fragestellung und methodisches Vorgehen...................................................................9 3.1. Zielsetzung und Fragestellung .............................................................................................. 9 3.2. Methodisches Vorgehen...................................................................................................... 10 II. Hauptteil..............................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • 10 10 Bizarre Stories of Nazi Archaeology
    19/7/2015 10 Bizarre Stories Of Nazi Archaeology - Listverse PREVIOUS WEIRD STUFF 10 Bizarre Stories Of Nazi Archaeology DAVID TORMSEN JULY 18, 2015 The National Socialists were obsessed with their bizarre racial theories and desperate to subvert the science of archaeology to support the notion of a pure race of ancient Aryan supermen. In the 1930s, the two main organizations devoted to Nazi pseudoarchaeology were the SS Ahnenerbe, dominated by Heinrich Himmler, and the Amt Rosenberg, an academic Nazi Party organization run by Alfred Rosenberg. They struggled for power, and the Ahnenerbe was eventually triumphant, but both organizations organized some loopy expeditions. We wrote recently about the bizarre expedition by the SS to Tibet to explore the history of the mythical Aryan race. Here are 10 more tales of archaeology gone badly wrong. Featured image credit: German Federal Archives Tiwanaku 10 Photo credit: Gestaltenohneverstand Photo via Wikipedia Photo credit: Pko http://listverse.com/2015/07/18/10-bizarre-stories-of-nazi-archaeology/ 1/26 19/7/2015 10 Bizarre Stories Of Nazi Archaeology - Listverse SS officer Edmund Kiss spent time in Bolivia in the 1920s, becoming friendly with Austrian adventurer and rubber maker Arthur Posnansky. Posnansky was involved with excavating the ancient city of Tiwanaku in the Altiplano region, characterized by its massive stone blacks and elaborate carvings, and he despised the local people. Also unwilling to believe that the ruins were built by the indigenous Aymara people, Kiss developed a wild theory that the city was actually built by wayward Nordic Atlanteans one million years ago; they subdued the local inhabitants before erecting the spectacular city.
    [Show full text]