Explain why Germans were so angry about the Treaty of Versailles [8] Advice AO1: Demonstrate knowledge and AO2: Explain why Germans were angry understanding of the period about the Treaty An [8] mark question on the Germany paper wants you to explain the cause of Band 1 (1 Band 2 (2 Band 3 (3 Band 1 (1 Band 2 (2-3 Band 3 (4-5 something – in this case, why ordinary German people were angry at the Treaty mark) marks) marks) mark) marks) marks) of Versailles. To answer this question, you need to know: I include I include I include I give very I partially I give a very very few some of the very little explain why detailed  What Germany was like before WW1 details of Treaty and detailed explanation Germans and logical  Details of the terms of the Treaty of Versailles the Treaty why information of why were angry explanation  What kind of peace treaty Germany expected to get and why Germans about the Germans about the of why Germans were angry Treaty and were angry Treaty Germans  Why the Treaty of Versailles was so bad for Germany were angry about it why about the were angry You aim to write at least 2 P.E.E.L. paragraphs (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link). about it Germans Treaty about the were angry Treaty [8] marks means you should spend about 8 minutes on this question. about it S/A or P/A Teacher Mark and Comment: Use this space to plan your answer:

/8 /8 Suggested Improvements:  Include some / more details of the terms of the Treaty or how it affected German people  Add / give more explanation of why Germans were angry about the Treaty  Improve quality of explanation by using P.E.E.L. paragraphs  Correct SPAG How can I do better next time?

Date: Moderated: ______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______How far did Gustav Stresemann solve Germany’s problems, 1923-1929? [6] Advice A01: Demonstrate knowledge A02: Analyse how much change there was and and understanding of the period reach a judgement An [6] mark question on the Germany paper wants you to explain how far Band 1 (1 Band 2 (2 Band 1 (1 Band 2 (2 Band 3 (3 something changed. This probably means that you will say some things changed a mark) marks) mark) marks) marks) lot and some things changed a little. You might want to consider: I demonstrate I demonstrate I have given a I have given I have made a some detailed limited analysis some analysis of detailed  Germany’s financial situation knowledge and knowledge and of the change the changes analysis of the  Germany’s status among the world’s powerful countries understanding understanding that happened that happened changes that of Stresemann’s of Stresemann’s under under happened  Germany’s reparations payments achievements achievements Stresemann Stresemann and under  The occupation of the Ruhr by France and Belgium made a Stresemann and judgement made a well- You should aim to write at least 2 P.E.E.L. paragraphs (Point, Evidence, about how far supported Explanation, Link). [6] marks means you should spend about 6 minutes on this he solved judgement Germany’s about how far question. problems he solved Germany’s problems S/A or P/A Teacher Mark and Comment: Use this space to plan your answer:

/6 /6 Suggested Improvements:  Include / some more details on Stresemann’s solutions  More analysis of how far Germany had improved  Include / improve final judgement  Correct SPAG Student Response:

Date: Moderated: ______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______How far did the lives of women change in Germany, 1933-1939? [6] Advice A01: Demonstrate knowledge A02: Analyse how much change there was and and understanding of the period reach a judgement An [6] mark question on the Germany paper wants you to explain how far Band 1 (1 Band 2 (2 Band 1 (1 Band 2 (2 Band 3 (3 something changed. This probably means that you will say some things changed a mark) marks) mark) marks) marks) lot and some things changed a little. You might want to consider: I demonstrate I demonstrate I have given a I have given I have made a some detailed limited analysis some analysis of detailed  Incentives to have children knowledge and knowledge and of the change the changes analysis of the understanding understanding that happened that happened changes that  Employment of change of and/or for women, for women happened for  Fashion and dress and/or continuity in 1933-1939 1933-1939 and women 1933-  Eugenics continuity in women’s lives made a 1939 and made women’s lives judgement a well- You should aim to write at least 2 P.E.E.L. paragraphs (Point, Evidence, about how far supported life changed judgement Explanation, Link). [6] marks means you should spend about 6 minutes on this about how far question. life changed S/A or P/A Teacher Mark and Comment: Use this space to plan your answer:

/6 /6 Suggested Improvements:  Include / some more details on changes for women  More analysis of how far life changed for women  Include / improve final judgement  Correct SPAG Student Response:

Date: Moderated: ______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______How far did the lives of young people change in Germany, 1933-1939? [6] Advice A01: Demonstrate knowledge A02: Analyse how much change there was and and understanding of the period reach a judgement An [6] mark question on the Germany paper wants you to explain how far Band 1 (1 Band 2 (2 Band 1 (1 Band 2 (2 Band 3 (3 something changed. This probably means that you will say some things changed a mark) marks) mark) marks) marks) lot and some things changed a little. You might want to consider: I demonstrate I demonstrate I have given a I have given I have made a some detailed limited analysis some analysis of detailed  Changes in education knowledge and knowledge and of the change the changes analysis of the understanding understanding that happened that happened changes that  The Hitler Youth of change of and/or for young for young happened for  Opposition groups (Edelweiss Pirates, Swing Youth) and/or continuity in people, 1933- people, 1933- young people, continuity in young people’s 1939 1939 and made 1933-1939 and You should aim to write at least 2 P.E.E.L. paragraphs (Point, Evidence, young people’s lives a judgement made a well- Explanation, Link). [6] marks means you should spend about 6 minutes on this lives about how far supported life changed judgement question. about how far life changed S/A or P/A Teacher Mark and Comment: Use this space to plan your answer:

/6 /6 Suggested Improvements:  Include / some more details on changes for young people

 More analysis of how far life changed for young people  Include / improve final judgement  Correct SPAG Student Response:

Date: Moderated:

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______How important was the Reichstag Fire of 1933 in Hitler’s consolidation of Advice power between 1933 and 1934? [12] A01: Demonstrate knowledge and A02: Explain how different events allowed A [12] mark question requires you to judge the importance of one factor understanding of the period Hitler to come to power in Germany compared to a number of other factors. You then have to decide which factor was the most important – the one named in the question or one of the others. In Band 1 – 1 Very limited detail used to support answer mark your concluding judgement, you will decide how important the factor named in Band 2 – 2 Some detail used to support answer the question is. marks Band 3 – 3 Good amount of detail used to support answer You might want to consider: marks Band 4 – 4 Accurate and very detailed support for answer  The Night of the Long Knives marks  The Enabling Act Band 1 – 1- Limited attempt to analyse and explain Reichstag Fire and other issues 2 marks  The death of President Hindenburg Band 2 – 3- Begins to analyse and explain importance of Reichstag Fire and other issues. 4 marks Unsupported judgement is made about importance of factors Band 3 – 5- Analyses and explains importance of Reichstag Fire and other issues. Clear 6 marks attempt to arrive at a supported judgement of which factor was most important Use this space to plan your answer: Band 4 – 7- Fully analyses and explains the importance of the Reichstag Fire and a number of

8 marks other factors. There is a reasoned and well-supported judgement of which factor was most important S/A or P/A Teacher Mark and Comment:

/12 /12 To improve:  Include some / more details of the key factors  Add / more explanation of why the factors were useful for Hitler  Add / improve judgement of which factor was most important Correct SPAG Student Response:

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______How important were the actions of Mikhail Gorbachev in the reunification Advice of Germany between 1985 and 1991? [12] A01: Demonstrate knowledge and A02: Explain how different factors A [12] mark question requires you to judge the importance of one factor understanding of the period caused Germany to be reunited compared to a number of other factors. You then have to decide which factor was the most important – the one named in the question or one of the others. In Band 1 – 1 Very limited details about one key figure used to support answer mark your concluding judgement, you will decide how important the factor named in Band 2 – 2 Some details about more than one key figure used to support answer the question is. marks Band 3 – 3 Good amount of detail about more than one key figure used to support As well as the role of Mikhail Gorbachev, you might want to consider the marks answer importance of the roles of: Band 4 – 4 Accurate and very detailed information about more than one key figure marks  Helmut Kohl Band 1 – 1- Limited attempt to analyse and explain why German was reunified 2 marks  Gunter Schabowski Band 2 – 3- Begins to analyse and explain importance of Gorbachev and at least one other 4 marks key figure. Unsupported judgement is made about importance of factors Band 3 – 5- Analyses and explains importance of Gorbachev and at least two other key 6 marks figures. Clear attempt to arrive at a supported judgement of which figure was Use this space to plan your answer: most important

Band 4 – 7- Fully analyses and explains the importance of Gorbachev and at least two 8 marks other other figures. There is a reasoned and well-supported judgement of which factor was most important S/A or P/A Teacher Mark and Comment:

/12 /12 To improve:

 Include some / more details of the key factors  Add / more explanation of why Germany was reunified  Add / improve judgement of which factor was most important  Correct SPAG Student Response:

Brief intro: ______When was Germany ______reunified? ______Which key individuals ______were involved? ______

Point – was ______Gorbachev important? ______Evidence: How did he ______contribute to reunification ______? Explain: Long ______or short term importance? ______

Point – was ______Kohl important? ______Evidence: How did he ______contribute to reunification ______? ______Explain: Long or short term ______importance? Point – was ______Schabowski important? ______Evidence: How did he ______contribute to reunification ______? Explain: Long ______or short term importance? ______

Conclusion: ______Answer the question! ______