Zambia PPCR Investment Plan

PPCR Monitoring and Reporting

Annual Reporting Period

From: January 1, 2015

To: December 31, 2015

Projects: ID No. XPCRZM041A Title Strengthening Climate Resilience (PPCR Phase II) Project

XPCRZM042A Strengthening Climate Resilience in the Kafue Sub-Basin

PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 PPCR Scorecard 1 Date of Report: . June 30, 2016 PPCR Core Indicator 1: Degree of integration of climate change into national planning Data Collection Method: Data scored at the country level

Zambia PPCR Investment Plan Reporting Period: From: January 1, 2015 To: December 31, 2015

Complete below the sectors identified as a priority in the PPCR Is there an approved climate Have climate resilience strategies been Has responsibility been assigned to Have specific measures to address climate investment plan. Insert other priority sectors or ministries change plan for the nation/ embedded in the central government's/ institutions or persons to integrate resilience been identified and prioritized? e.g. Do all planning processes routinely below(optional) sector? sector's principal planning documents? climate resilience planning? investments and programs screen for climate risks? b c d e f

Score- 2014 Score- 2014 Score- 2014 Score- 2014 Score-2015 Score- 2014 reporting period Score-2015 a reporting period reporting period Score-2015 reporting period reporting period Score-2015 reporting period reporting period (last Score-2015 reporting reporting period (last year) reporting (last year) (last year) (new) (last year) (new) year) period (new) (new) period (new)

National Planning 5 5 7 7 6 7 6 6 3 5 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. No change from the previous year. The draft The Interim Inter-Ministerial Climate No change from the previous year. Specific There is an increase from the previous reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please The National Climate Response Climate Change policy was being worked on Change Secretariat (ICCS) was in place to measures (investments and programs) to address year's score because screening for Climate explain! Strategy (NCCRS) is still in draft form, after receiving comments from stakeholders coordinate climate change activities until climate resilience have been identified and Change risks is done in a selection of awaiting the approval of the Climate and is awaiting cabinet approval. A Climate permanent institutional arrangements approved, but application has not been consistent projects, though not consistently across Change policy although a number of proofing manual has been developed to assist were put in place. These were awaiting throughout government sectors. However, procurement process its recommendations are being in mainstreaming efforts finalization and approval of the climate for consultancy to develop screening implemented. change policy. guidelines for priority sectors by ICCS ongoing

Environment and Natural Resources 6 7 7 8 6 6 3 4 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores A number of planning documents in the sector There was an increase from the previous No change from the previous year,. Some There is an increase from the previous reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please have CR strategies embedded, hence the year's score because responsibility has programs and investments in place e.g. the NAMAs year's score because screening for climate explain! increase in score. Climate Change has been been assigned to focal persons supported is currently under development. The sector also risks in planning has started but is not embedded in the sectorial strategic plan, by approved budgets successfully facilitated the finalization of Zambia's consistent across the sector National Bio diversity Strategy action Plan Internally Determined Contributions (INDCs) for (NBSAP), though National Policy on submission to COP 21 Environment has very limited information on Climate Change. The REDD+ strategy on deforestation has been done and approved. The National Forestry Policy (2014) also has climate change considerations embedded

Agriculture (Livestock, Fisheries and Crops) 8 8 7 8 7 7 5 5 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. The National Officers have been appointed as focal No change from the previous year. Some programs No change from the previous year. There reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please Agriculture Policy (2014) has climate change point persons and been assigned to ensure and investments in place however not to scale, e.g. has been some pilot screening for Climate explain! strategies embedded; the National Agriculture climate resilience planning and this is the Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Change risks in a selection of projects, but Investment Plan (NAIP) 2013 also addresses supported by budgets and job descriptions Project is limited in scope, that is, was only piloted screening is not mandatory across the Climate Change. hence increase from last year's score in a few districts, and the PPCR participatory sector adaptation is being piloted in 25 districts. There are 103 districts in Zambia. The sector is also implementing a climate smart agriculture project with support from FAO.

Health 7 7 7 7 6 7 5 5

PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 2 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. Climate No change from the previous year. Officers Some programs and investments in place, e.g. No change from the previous year. There reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please Change embedded in the National Health policy have been appointed as focal point Unintended Persistent Organic Pollutants (UPOP) has been some pilot screening for Climate explain! (2013); National Health Adaptation plan to persons and been assigned to ensure projects (GEF/UNDP), Zambia Health Services Change risks in a selection of projects, but climate change (regional plan to which Zambia climate resilience planning, supported by Improvement project (WB), Environmental screening is not mandatory across the is party) done in 2013 and approved in 2014; budgets Safeguards in Malaria control. Also, National sector Epidemic preparedness response (EPR) plans Adaptation Plans (NAPs) for Health being which take into account CC. developed hence the increase from the previous year's score.

Transport and Infrastructure 8 8 6 4 5 5 7 8 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. The Sectorial There was a decrease from the previous No change from the previous year. Some programs There is an increase from the previous reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please Strategic Plan (2014-2016) for the Ministry of year because the Ministry of Transport, and investments in place including PPCR year because screening mandated in the explain! Transport, Works, Supply and Communication Works, Supply and Communication was investments (PPCR Component: Climate resilient sector as infrastructure planning & design developed and has climate change divided into the Ministry of Works and infrastructure and NDF Developing Climate usually accounts for worst case scenario considerations embedded in it. Supply and the Ministry of Communication Resilient Infrastructure Standards and Codes (including extreme events). & Transport in the period under review. Project). Also Green Jobs/ Buildings being done by Responsibility has been identified with National Council for Construction (NCC) in only a few assigned for integrating climate partnership with International Labor Organisation resilience planning (ILO).

Energy 6 6 4 4 5 5 3 1 How do you Justify increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. Energy No change from the previous year. No change from the previous year. Specific There is a reduction from the previous reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year 2015? Briefly policy 2008 and the Rural Electrification Agency Responsibility has been identified with measures (investment & programs) to address year because the sector is now in the describe with evidence. (REA) Master plan (2008) has CR strategies only a few assigned for integrating climate climate resilience have been identified, approved process of developing guidelines for embedded in them which are being used in the resilience planning and are being implemented e.g. ZESCO has screening climate risks planning process. Also the 2014-2016 Strategic embarked on some Renewable Energy Based Plan for REA has shifted from a traditional Electricity Generation for Mini-Grids, Rural energy approach to renewable energy approach Electrification Agency (REA) implementing some of the work agreed under the NAMAs i.e. rural electrification.

Tourism 4 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. The Sectorial No change from the previous year. Plans No change from the previous year. Work has No change from the previous year. Plans reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please Strategic Plan does not have climate change are in place to assign a focal point person commenced to identify measures to address are in place to develop climate risk explain! considerations however the Tourism policy is climate change screening guidelines being reviewed. Plans in place to develop a Master Plan for the Tourism sector

` Water 5 6 3 5 6 6 5 5 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores There is an increase from the previous year There has been an increase from the No change from the previous year. Specific No change from the previous year. There reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please because more institutions and statutory bodies previous year because focal point persons measures (investments and programs) to address has been some pilot screening for Climate explain! within the sector have climate change that have been assigned climate resilience have been identified and Change risks in a selection of projects, but strategies embedded in their strategic plans, approved, e.g. a Climate Resilient Rural Water screening is not mandatory across the e.g. National Water Supply and Sanitation Supply & Sanitation Project supported by Nordic sector Council (NWASCO). Also the Water Resource Development Fund (NDF) and African Management Act (2011) some provision for Development Bank. Also, the Zambia Water climate change which could be strengthened. Resource Development project funded by the National water policy (2010) has climate World Bank for dam and well construction as well change considerations in it as the establishment of irrigation Schemes and flood warning systems.

Instructions: 1. Please establish scoring criteria for each of the aspects of this scorecard and submit them with your report. This should be done once, preferably at baseline stage and used during subsequent reporting years. 2. If you have previously established your scoring criteria, use them and submit them with your report . 3. Score each cell with a score between 0 and 10 (refer to your scoring criteria defined for this scorecard) 4. Provide explanation of change in scores between 2014 and 2015 in appropriate cells and avoid abbreviations.

PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 3 Gender Mainstreaming: To what extent and in what ways have gender and socioeconomic vulnerability concerns been mainstreamed with the climate resilience planning processes at national and sector levels ? (e.g., through gender budgeting approaches; gender needs assessments and consultations, or similar, including coordination with the Ministry of Women’s Affairs, women’s organizations).

The planning process in Zambia considers gender as a cross-cutting issue cutting across all sectors and mainstreaming forms part of any planning and policy document at National and Sector level. Additionally, the ICCS coordinates with the Ministry of Gender in the development of a Gender Action Plan on climate change. The ministry of Gender is spearheading this process and involves other key sectors. The ICCS has planned to formulate a PPCR specific gender strategy drawing on the national gender strategy guidelines.

Lessons learned: What have been the key successes when integrating climate change in national, including sector planning ? 1. Most all sectors now have climate resilience strategies embedded in their planning documents, with increasing in budgetary allocations to these activities. 2. Almost all sectors now have specific programs promoting climate resilience e.g. In Agriculture, the Farmer Input Support Programme (FISP) is linked to addressing climate change impacts, Green buildings project being done by National Council for Construction (NCC) in partnership with ILO ( in infrastructure sector), etc. 3. Most sectors and ministries now have budget allocations for climate issues and programs What have been the key challenges and what opportunies for improvement do you see? 1. There is need to focus on how to move from planning process to actual implementation to ensure that there is impact from the mainstreaming process 2. Some Ministries are in the process of revising their strategic plans and are also developing Master plans for their sectors' e.g. Ministry of Tourism. This creates an opportunity to leverage the process so as to ensure that Climate Resilience strategies are embedded in these planning documents

3. There is limited screening of climate risks across all sectors. This has been mostly because of lack of screening guidelines. The ICCS is in the process of procuring a consultant to support the process.

Sharing experiences: please let us have some insights into the particular experience of your country with integrating climate change in national, including sector planning Mainstreaming climate resilience into National and Sector plans has already started to produce results in the 2014, 2015 sector budget allocations. A budget tracking tool expert was recruited by the ICCS to carry out a detailed analysis of the national budget in order to analyze how Government allocations to climate resilience development is being used. Additionally, the Consultant was tasked to refine the existing budget tracking tool that was developed by the Zambia Climate Change Network (ZCCN) for consistency in what constitutes climate resilience allocations, assess the adequacy of the tracking tool and recommend improvements. The results of the work showed that there is significant increase in sector budget allocations. This consultancy also demonstrated the importance of mainstreaming which has a direct impact on the budgets.

PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 4 PPCR Scorecard 2 Date of Report: June 30, 2016 PPCR Core Indicator 2: Evidence of strengthened government capacity and coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience

Data Collection Method: Data scored at the country level Zambia PPCR Investment Plan Reporting Period: From: January 1, 2015 To: December 31, 2015

Government Capacity Complete below Are information, studies and assessments Do national/sector incentives and the sectors identified as a priority in the PPCR investment plan. Insert other addressing climate change, variability and Is the necessary climate change legislative policies expressly address Does the government/sector participate in priority sectors or ministries below (optional) resilience available? expertise available? climate change and resilience? the coordination mechanism? a b c d e Score- 2014 Score- 2014 Score- 2014 Score- 2014 reporting Score-2015 Score-2015 reporting period (last Score-2015 reporting reporting period (last reporting period Score-2015 reporting period (last year) reporting period reporting period year) period (new) year) (last year) period (new) (new) (new) Zambia Government 6 6 5 5 3 4 7 8 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported Not much progress from previous year. A Few highly qualified experts available Some incentives and legislative policies Interim Government driven coordination last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please explain! number of studies and assessments have been across the sectors are available within most sectors but mechanism in place. Need to permanent undertaken but access as well as consolidation indirectly related to Climate Change and institutional arrangement of information needs to be improved Climate Resilience

Environment and Natural Resources 4 4 4 4 1 3 5 5 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported Not much progress from previous year. A lot Not much progress from previous year. Some legislative policies are available in Not much progress from previous year. last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please explain! of studies and assessments have been done There are few persons who are trained in the environmental sector but indirectly Stakeholders felt that participation of the but accessibility of information is a challenge. climate change resilience and are qualified related to Climate Change and Climate sector in the Interim Climate Change in climate change resilience. Resilience Secretariat (ICCS) needs to be enhanced.

Agriculture (Livestock, Fisheries and Crops) 5 6 4 5 2 5 4 4

How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported Limited periodic studies being done to update There is an increase from the previous Some incentives are available directly Not much progress from previous year. last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please explain! information in the sector; however, year because at least one person in most related to Climate Change and Climate Stakeholders felt that participation of the accessibility of information is a challenge departments in the Ministry has been Resilience e.g. Farmers input support sector in the Interim Climate Change trained and is qualified in climate change programme (FISP), providing seeds Secretariat (ICCS) needs to be enhanced. resilience and has experience working on according to agro-ecological regions e.g. climate change projects/ programs flood areas - rice, drought areas - drought resistant seedlings

Health 7 7 5 5 2 3 5 5 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported No change from the previous year. Some No change from the previous year. There Some incentives are available but No change from the previous year. last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please explain! vulnerability assessments have been done by are few persons who are trained in indirectly related to Climate Change and Participation of sector needs to be enhanced Disaster Management & Mitigation Unit climate change resilience and are qualified Climate Resilience e.g. free spraying of (DMMU); Other studies include linkage in climate change resilience. mosquitos and free Insectide Treated between climate change and disease Nets (ITN) for expecting mothers to occurrence; The sector has a website (District address malaria (Climate sensitive Health Information System (DHIS2)) on which disease); Government programme to information from districts is posted. Because replace fridges (CFCs) health information is sensitive accessibility of information is on request/demand

Transport and Infrastructure 2 2 2 2 0 1 4 4 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported Not much progress from previous year. A few Not much progress from previous year. Some incentives are available but No change from the previous year. last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please explain! of the required information, studies or Some Government / sector officials have indirectly related to Climate Change and Participation of sector needs to be enhanced assessments have been done but accessibility attended climate change training courses. Climate Resilience is a challenge

PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 5 Energy 6 6 4 4 4 4 3 2

How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported No change from the previous year. A lot of Not much progress from previous year. Not much progress from previous year. There is a decrease from last year's score last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please explain! research work has been done in the energy There are few persons who are trained in Some incentives and legislative policies because stakeholders felt that participation of sector, e.g. ' the effects of climate change on climate change resilience and are qualified are in place but indirectly address the sector in the Interim Climate Change hydro-energy'; however information may not in climate change resilience climate change e.g. no tax on Secretariat (ICCS) needs to be enhanced. There be readily accessible. importation of solar panels, 'Feed-in was need for greater coordination of the tariffs' for alternative energy providers sector's climate change activities by ICCS. (various sources of energy feeding into the main national grid). Tourism 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 4

How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported Not much progress from previous year. A few No change from the previous year. Very Not much progress from previous year. There is an increase from the previous year last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please explain! of the required information, studies or few people knowledgeable and this is Some incentives are available but because stakeholders felt that the sector assessments have been done but accessibility from attending workshops and not indirectly related to Climate Change and participation in the coordination mechanism is a challenge training courses Climate Resilience e.g. People in Game had improved in the period under review. Management Areas (GMAs) provided with alternative livelihoods to discourage deforestation.

Water 2 5 2 3 3 3 5 6 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported There was an increase from the previous year Not much progress from previous year. No change from the previous year. There is an increase from the previous year last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please explain! because a number of studies have been done There are few persons who are trained in Some incentives and legislative policies because stakeholders felt that the sector commissioned by various institutions and climate change resilience and are qualified are in place but indirectly address participation in the coordination mechanism statutory bodies. Some information, studies or in climate change resilience climate change e.g. increase in tariffs for had improved in the period under review. assessments are readily available though utilities with low non-revenue water accessibility is a challenge levels (reducing water losses and promoting water conservation).

Coordination Mechanism Is the coordination mechanism Does it coordinate climate resilience Name the coordination mechanism functional e.g., established, effective interventions other than those funded by Is there a broad set of non-governmental Is the relevant climate resilience below and efficient? PPCR? stakeholders involved? information in the public domain? Are females and males participating equally?

Score reported last Score reported last Score reported last year Score in 2015 Score reported last Score reported last year (2014) Score in 2015 (new) year (2014) Score in 2015 (new) (2014) year (2014) Score in 2015 (new) year (2014) Score in 2015 (new) (new)

National Climate Change 5 5 5 5 6 6 4 5 5 5 Development Council

How do you justify the increase (or Interim Climate Change Secretariat is Growing portfolio of climate change initiatives Active stakeholder engagement in various Limited relevant climate resilience Interim Climate Change Secretariat has equal decrease) in scores between scores fulfilling the mandate until the National (Green Climate Fund, SREP, Bio Carbon, FIP, activities and also stakeholders grouped information in the public domain participation of males and females reported in 2014 reporting period and Climate Change Development Council is GRZ-UN Joint Programme, Green Growth into platforms according to areas of scores reported in 2015 reporting formed Strategy) specialization (Climate information, period ? Please explain!(2015) ? Climate Finance, Climate resilient Please explain! agriculture and Climate resilient infrastructure).

Gender considerations and Coordination mechanism: Please elaborate on whether and how gender good practice at the institutional level has been mainstreamed into the coordination mechanism unit This should include commentary on the number of technical staff (women, men) in the unit and whether any gender training/ capacity-building has been offered with PPCR support to: i) staff in the Coordination Unit(women, men)other Government staff working on climate change PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 6 There is a planned mentoring of the Environmental Management and Social Inclusion Manager (responsible for the gender portfolio) - in gender aspects to strengthen the coordination function of the ICCS in this area. The ICCS is staffed by 14 technical personnel comprising of 6 females and 8 males.

Lessons Learned: What have been the key successes when strengthening the Government capacity and the coordination mechanism? The ICCS was mandated to coordinate climate change activities across sectors and projects in Zambia until a permanent institution is put in place. The portfolio of climate change initiatives being overseen by the Secretariat has grown significantly over time including the Scaling Up Renewable Energy Programme (SREP), Zambia Integrated Forestry Landscape Programme (ZIFL), Forest Investment Programme (FIP), United Nations Joint Programme (UNJP), Green Growth Strategy and Enhancing Capacity on Low Emission Development Strategy (EC-LEDS) 2. Awareness on climate change and climate change initiatives being undertaken within the sectors has increased.

What have been the key challenges and what opportunities for improvement do you see? 3. There is still room for enhanced participation of sectors and improvement in the coordination of climate change activities by the Interim Inter-Ministerial Climate Change Secretariat. 4. There is need to improve accessibility of information, studies and assessments relating to climate change, variability and resilience. Stakeholders indicated that though they had studies/ information was available, access to this information is still a challenge.

Sharing experiences : Please let us have some insights into the particular experience of your country with strengthening the Government capacity and the coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience Key lessons learnt from the Zambian experience are the following: 1. In order to ensure sustainability, coordination arrangements for climate change ( in terms of placement, structures, etc.) must be not be imposed but agreed internally by national stakeholders. 2. In order to maintain relevance of the Coordination mechanism, it is vital that it is seen to add value to a country's climate change agenda and there is no duplication of efforts with sector ministries and institutions. 3. Strong support at the highest level is essential as it results in support for budget allocation, provides leadership, and gives legitimacy and acceptability to the process.

PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 7 PPCR Scorecard 3 Date of Report: June 30, 2016 PPCR Core Indicator 3: Quality of and extent to which climate responsive instruments/investment models are developed and tested Data Collection Method: Scored at the project-level and compiled at the PPCR Investment plan level PPCR Investment Plan Country Aggregate Report Reporting Period: From: January 1, 2015 To: December 31, 2015 Has the instrument/ investment model Has the instrument/ investment model Has the instrument/ investment model been Has the instrument/ investment model been Project Title Climate responsive instrument/ investment models identified: appropriately incorporated the needs of both incorporated the needs of vulnerable populations developed and tested? implemented to the scale proposed? females and males into its design and into its design and implementation? a # b c d e f 1 Climate Resilient sub-grants (Community level) 7 4 7 7 Briefly comment on each score Implementation of community sub-grants has Implementation of community sub-grants has began Design of community sub-grants incorporates the Design of community sub-grants incorporates the began in all districts though the progress is slow less than 50% of the proposed scale (150 projects needs of males & females, however a number of needs of vulnerable populations, however a out of 1150 targeted approved sub-grants are yet to be implemented number of sub-grants are yet to be implemented.

2 Climate Resilient sub-grants (Ward level) 6 3 7 7 Briefly comment on each score Ward sub-grants has been developed and 4 Ward sub-projects out of targeted 72 were under Design of ward sub-grants incorporates the needs Design of ward sub-grants incorporates the needs implementation has began in 4 wards. However, implementation. of males & females, however a number of sub- of vulnerable populations, however a number of the requirement to have ward development plan grants are yet to be implemented sub-grants are yet to be implemented. has been an impending factor making implementation slow 3 Climate Resilient Sub-grants (District level) 3 1 0 0 Briefly comment on each score Work to access district level sub-grants using Plans are in place to begin implementation, districts Design & implementation of district level sub- Design & implementation of district level sub- District Development Plans (DDPs)/ Strategic working on climate proofing of DDPs /SDPs and grants is yet to commence grants is yet to commence Development Plans (SDPs) has began but progress identification of projects has been slow because original focus was Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) Strengthening Climate 4 Climate Risk Assessment 8 5 10 10 Resilience (PPCR Phase II) Climate risk assessment are done during the Climate risk assessment done during the Gender Project uses a Gender Climate Risk Assessment Design incorporates the needs of vulnerable Project Gender Climate Risk Assessment (GCRA) process for Climate Risk Assessment (GCRA) process, however (GCRA) approach. populations community projects this has not been tackled effectively.

5 Climate Risk Maps 8 4 10 3 Climate risk maps are done during the Gender Climate risk maps done during the Gender Climate Project uses a Gender Climate Risk Assessment Climate Risk Assessment (GCRA) process for Risk Assessment (GCRA) process, however this has (GCRA) approach. community projects not been tackled effectively.

6 District/Strategic Development Plans 3 2 3 3 Climate proofing of DDPs/SDPs: work has began but Climate proofing of DDPs/SDPs: work has began but Gender mainstreaming during development of Consideration of vulnerable groups during progress slow due to lack of capacities and progress slow due to limited capacities and plans is a requirement, however most plans are development of plans is a requirement, however resources in districts resources in districts still under development most plans are still under development

7 Rehabilitation of canals to operate near optimum level 2 2 7 0 Briefly comment on each score Procurement process for contractors to undertake Procurement process for contractors to undertake Design for the rehabilitation of the canals took Design for the rehabilitation of the canals took the works still in progress the works still in progress into consideration of the needs of both males into consideration of the needs of vulnerable and females, however implementation has not groups, however implementation has not yet yet began began 1 Climate Training Sessions 9 8 9 7 Briefly comment on each score Trainings held for all 11 districts and Provincial 11 training sessions were conducted against the The trainings have been gender responsive in Trained staff are identifying projects that are Planning Sub Committees (PPSC) in all 3 provinces. planned 12. design and implementation. taking into account needs of the vulnerable Stakeholders also included community members people, however, implementation is yet to commence 2 Micro Projects 5 1 7 5 Briefly comment on each score Community facilitation and identification of micro Implementation had not yet commenced, however Proposals for micro projects are gender Proposals for micro projects consider vulnerable projects to be funded has began identification of projects to be implemented had responsive in design however, implementation is groups in design however, implementation is yet began. yet to begin to begin

3 Technological Packages (farm level system support) 5 1 7 5 Strengthening Climate Briefly comment on each score Community facilitation and identification of Implementation had not yet commenced, however Proposals for technological packages are gender Proposals for technological packages consider Resilience in the Kafue Sub- technological packages to be funded has began identification of projects to be implemented had responsive in design however, implementation is vulnerable groups in design however, Basin began. yet to begin implementation is yet to begin

4 Medium- large scale investment projects 0 0 0 0 Briefly comment on each score Not yet commenced implementation Not yet commenced implementation Not yet commenced implementation Not yet commenced implementation 5 Climate Resilient Road 3 0 7 5 Briefly comment on each score Detailed designs for the road and bidding Not yet commenced implementation The climate resilient road investment/model is The climate resilient road investment/model takes documents for the consultancy for supervision and responsive to gender issues in design (design into account needs of vulnerable groups but works for the roads have been completed and the /ESIA documents) implementation has not yet began (design / ESIA procurement process for Works and Services documents) ongoing 6 Integrated Development Plans 0 0 0 0 Briefly comment on each score Not yet commenced Not yet commenced implementation Not yet commenced implementation Not yet commenced implementation Instructions :

Lessons Learned: What have been the key successes when developing and testing these instruments/investment models? The PPCR has been facilitating the strengthening of capacities of Government officials to mainstream climate resilience into provincial and district-level planning. Provincial Planning Units (PPU) & District Planning Officers (DPOs) in the targeted Provinces and Districts have been trained in theoretical and procedural Working with the Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) as partners- Climate Risk Adaptation Facilitators (CRAFs)- in the PPCR process has provided various advantages such as complementarity and collaboration in activities given that they have a lot of experience in facilitating communities and are already on the As at 31 December 2015, 665 Projects had been submitted to the priority districts by the Climate Risk Adaptation Facilitators (CRAFs) for desk and field appraisal, of which 514 were soft adaptation projects and 151 were infrastructure (hard) projects. Also, 152 projects in the Barotse sub-basin has been approved for What have been the key challenges and what opportunities for improvement do you see? Though working with the Non-Governmental Organisation (NGOs) as partners can be advantageous, challenges such as differing capacity levels exist in terms of training and facilitation skills of individual trained NGOs or Climate Risk Adaptation Facilitators (CRAFs) exist. Where capacity is limited, facilitation of sub- Lack of Integrated Ward Development Plans (IWPs) and Integrated District Development Plans (IDPs) which were a pre condition for PPCR support to wards and district projects respectively. Since the process to have these in place is long, costly and does not depend on the project, Districts will work with existing District Sometimes effective communication during the implementation of a programmatic and participatory programme like the PPCR, which involves multiple stakeholders is a challenge. PPCR Table 4 Date of Report: June 30, 2016 PPCR Core Indicator 4: Extent to which vulnerable households, communities, businesses and public sector services use improved PPCR supported tools, instruments, strategies, activities to respond to Climate Variability and Climate Change

Data Collection Method: Data collected for each project and compiled at the PPCR investment plan level PPCR Investment Plan Country Aggregate Report Reporting Period: From: January 1, 2015 To: December 31, 2015 Only complete for the categories targeted by the tool, instrument, strategy, or activity Identify the improved PPCR supported tool, instrument, Write up to Number of Public Sector strategy, activity below. Number of Households Number of Communities Number of Businesses three Service Entities Write up to three Actual sentences Project Title These are the same as those identified in Actual results sentences Actual results results describing Actual results Scorecard 3 (Cumulative describing how (Cumulative Write up to three (Cumulativ how (Cumulative since project Expected households use since project sentences describing how e since Expected businesses since project Expected Write up to three sentences describing how public started) Results this? started) Expected Results communities use this? project Results use this? started) Results sector service entities use this? a # b c d e f g h i j k l m n 1a Climate Resilient sub-grants 1. Diversify to (Community Level) climate resilient livelihoods, crops or infrastructure; 2. Soft Adaptation (community to undertake locally appropriate 4,911 25,800 innovations); 3. 78 individual champions (30% for women) to benefit Strengthening Climate Resilience (PPCR Phase II) Project 1b Climate Resilient sub-grants (Ward 1. Diversify to climate Level) resilient livelihoods, crops or infrastructure; 2. Communities use improved tools, information and instruments to respond 4 wards 24 wards to climate change and variability 3. Promote the uptake of locally- appropriate innovations

Page 10 1c Climate Resilient sub-grants (District 1. Use improved tools, information and instruments to Level) respond to climate change and variability; 2. Building resilience to climate risks into local planning (particularly as these plans are expected to drive local budgets) 3. Through risk-based planning and mapping, local governments and communities can visualize 14 District 0 options for future expansion of their settlements and Councils infrastructure

2 Climate Risk Assessment 1. To incorporate climate risk assessment into provincial level planning; 2. Develop knowledge products in area of climate change and risk management to share with Strengthening communities; 3. Build capacity required for 14 District mainstreaming climate adaptation and risk Climate Resilience 14 Districts Councils (PPCR Phase II) management. Project

3 Climate Risk Maps 1. To incorporate climate risk assessment into provincial level planning; 2. Develop knowledge products in area of climate change and risk management to share with communities; 3. Build capacity required for mainstreaming climate adaptation and risk management. 14 District 14 districts Councils

4 District / Strategic Development 1. To account for risks 1. To account for risks associated with climate change Plans associated with climate impacts such as event of droughts, floods, and extreme change impacts such as heat and frost events; 2. Utilize opportunities in the event of droughts, floods, opportunities through identifying projects for and extreme heat and interventions; 3. Use as basis for allocating resources in frost events; 2. Utilize annual budget opportunities in the opportunities through Strengthening identifying projects for 6 pilot Climate Resilience 0 18 wards interventions; 3. Use as 0 district (PPCR Phase II) basis for allocating councils Project resources in annual budget

Page 11 5 Contingency Adaptation Fund 1. To fund additional sub- 0 25,800 projects upon early warning of a disaster Strengthening 6 Rehabilitation of Canals to operate 1. Used for Climate Resilience near optimum level Navigation (PPCR Phase II) (transport); 2. Project Used for drainage 0 8,340 of agricultural land; 3. Used as a source of food (fishing)

1 Climate Training Sessions -To incorporate climate risk assessment into provincial level planning; -Develop knowledge products in area of climate change 11 training 15 training and risk management to share with communities; sessions sessions - Build capacity required for mainstreaming climate adaptation and risk management.

2 Micro Projects -Flood control and diversion structures; - Small-scale irrigation 0 27 wards schemes; Strengthening -Community forest Climate Resilience in plantations and wildlife the Kafue Sub-Basin estates 3 Technological Packages (farm level - Conservation system support) agricultural training; -Livestock and fisheries for diversification farming systems; 0 27 wards -Providing inputs such as seeds for drought and flood resistant crop varieties for crop diversification

Page 12 4 Medium- large scale investment - Livestock projects production ; - Out grower 0 200 schemes (crops & livestock); - Fisheries

5 Climate Resilient Road -Use as strategic farm - to - market access roads; -Link to Kafue National 0 27 wards Park; -

Strengthening 6 Integrated Development Plans -To account for risks Climate Resilience in associated with climate the Kafue Sub-Basin change impacts such as event of droughts, floods, and extreme heat and frost events; - Utilize opportunities in the opportunities through identifying 11 Districts (27 0 projects for wards) interventions; - Use as basis for allocating resources in annual budget

Instructions : 1. List the same climate responsive instrument/ investment models /tools etc. as those identified in scorecard 3 2. Clearly identify the target population of your instruments / investment models/tools etc. : Is it Households? Communities? Businesses (private sector), public service entities or a combination thereof (refer to the project documents). 3. Actual results : cumulatively report results achieved since the project started implementation. Expected Results : Results expected to be achieved at completion of the project as stated in the project document.

Gender considerations : In what ways have women and men, including those from below the poverty line, used PPCR-supported tools, instruments, strategies, and activities to respond to Climate Change at the household/ farm level? community level? Business level? public service level? What have been the results and outcomes from this uptake of activities? As at 31 December, 152 projects in the Barotse sub-basin had been approved for funding (4 Ward projects & 83 ‘soft adaptation’ and 65 Community Infrastructure Projects) in Limulunga, Mongu, Nalolo, Sesheke, Sioma, Kalabo, Lukulu, Kazungula, Mwandi & Senanga districts. Some of these projects include: Infrastructure (canals, water harvesting structures, solar-powered boreholes), Livestock disease control structures (Crush Pens), Animal Draft Power (oxen for land preparation), Gardening (vegetable production under irrigation), Food Security (growing of short duration maize crops, cassava, sweet potatoes, etc.), Fish Farming (fish ponds, fingering restocking) and Small livestock projects (goat & village chicken rearing). These projects are being implemented at community and ward level, with project committees and maintenance committees established for each sub-project, comprising of male and female members. This has resulted in building capacities of beneficiaries. Since the implementation of most projects has just commenced, expected outcomes of improved livelihoods and food security are yet to be observed.

Lessons Learned: What have been the key successes when households/communities/public services/businesses use the improved tool, instrument, investment strategy, activity. 1. Transfer of knowledge and building of capacities in the beneficiaries at all levels (community, ward and district) has resulted e.g. In climate adaptation, project management, procurement, monitoring & evaluation and financial management.

2. The sub-projects have also provided employment for the community members, e.g. canal clearing and which have resulted in increase in household income.

What have been the key challenges and what opportunities for improvement do you see? 1. Staff turnover of trained District staff due to transfers and resulting in continuous capacity building and an increase in resources being used as trainings target a lot more people 2. There is an opportunity to increase involvement of private sector. This is especially important to ensure that identified projects incorporate value addition and communities are assisted to identify potential market linkages to support community soft adaptation projects that have production and value

Page 13 3. Sometimes inadequate community facilitation on the PPCR improved tool, instrument, investment strategy or activity, has led to misunderstanding of the project and lack of ownership of the process by the beneficiaries. 4. The scoring for this PPCR core indicator for the Kafue Sub-Basin was zero (0) because although the instruments/ investment models were identified and partially designed, none of them had been implemented yet. The period under review focused on building capacity in the district teams for project i l i

Page 14 PPCR Table 5 Date of Report: 30-Mar-16 PPCR Core Indicator 5: Number of people supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change Data Collection Method: Data collected for each project and compiled at the PPCR Investment Plan level Zambia Country Aggregate Report Reporting Period From: January 1, 2015 To: December 31, 2015 Direct beneficiaries

Actual results (Cumulative Expected Results since project started) Project Title a b c

Number of people supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change 23,689 130,000 Strengthening Climate Resilience Number of people below the national poverty line supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change 23,689 138,914 (PPCR Phase II) Project Females supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change 13,273 39,000

Number of people supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change 0 800,000 Strengthening Climate Resilience in Number of people below the national poverty line supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change 0 174,276 the Kafue Sub-Basin Females supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change 0 240,000

Total number of people supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in the country 23,689 930,000 Zambia Total number of people below the national poverty line supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in 23,689 313,190 ( aggregation of two the country projects ) Total number of females supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in the country 13,273 279,000

Instructions : 1. Actual results: cumulatively report the number of people supported by the project since it started implementation. 2. Expected Results : number of people expected to be reached by the project at completion as stated in the project document. 3. If the target population of the project is households or communities, provide best estimates of the number of people in these households or communities. Triangulate this data with data provided in Table 4 for consistency. 4.Please do not leave blank cells. Put Zero (0) in the corresponding cell if people are not supported yet by the project.

PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 15 Lessons Learned: What have been the key successes when people have been supported by the PPCR? 1. Transfer of knowledge and building of capacities in the beneficiaries at all levels (community, ward and district) has resulted e.g. In climate adaptation, project management, procurement, monitoring & evaluation and financial management. 2. As at 31 December, 152 projects in the Barotse sub-basin had been approved for funding in 10 districts. Some of these projects include: Infrastructure (canals, water harvesting structures, solar-powered boreholes), Livestock disease control structures (Crush Pens), Animal Draft Power (oxen for land preparation), Gardening (vegetable production under irrigation), Food Security (growing of short duration maize crops, cassava, sweet potatoes, etc.), Fish Farming (fish ponds, fingering restocking) and Small livestock projects (goat & village chicken rearing). This has resulted in building capacities of beneficiaries. Since the implementation of most projects has just commenced, expected outcomes of improved livelihoods and food security are yet to be observed.

What have been the key challenges and what opportunities for improvement do you see? 3. Promoting project ownership within the communities is sometimes a challenge and requires continuous community engagement to ensure sustainability of the benefits.

4. Regular monitoring of the sub-projects and backstopping of District teams and NGOs (CRAFs) helps to identify gaps and resolve issues timely to allow for effective project implementation. 5.The scoring for this PPCR core indicator for the Kafue Sub-Basin was zero (0) because it is dependent on activities undertaken under core indicators 3 & 4. Despite instruments/ investment models being identified and partially designed, none of them had been implemented and therefore no actual number of people had been supported by the PPCR during the reporting year, hence the score of zero (0).

PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 16 Summary of the scoring workshop Who were the different stakeholder groups invited to the scoring workshop (composition and number)? Please attach the list of participants.

A total of 10 workshops were held at National, Sector and project level with about 95 stakeholders from priority sectors were met namely: Environment & Natural Resources, Transport & Infrastructure, Tourism, Water, Agriculture & Livestock, Energy and Health. The number of stakeholders in the sector meetings ranged from 3-6. The meetings had representatives from Government, Private Sector, Civil Society Organisations and Academia (the list of participants has been attached).

How did you define your scoring criteria for Scorecards 1 and 2 (national level) and scorecard 3 (project level)? Please attach scoring criteria for scorecards 1, 2, and 3

A guide for filling out scorecards 1, 2 & 3 was developed in March 2014 through stakeholder consultation. The criteria was revised in 2015 based on input from the Implementation Guidance on the Participatory Monitoring and Reporting (PM&R) System for PPCR Phase II developed for Zambia by ESSA Technologies and Rural Net Associates and the 2015 PPCR Monitoring & Reporting toolkit. The criteria used for the scoring has been attached.

Please provide a brief summary of the workshop (What were the key issues raised during the workshop? )

The scoring workshops involved stakeholders with sector specific-knowledge to provide input on the various aspects of the indicators. Because the stakeholders were from diverse backgrounds and institutions, the workshops provided an insight into the gaps and areas requiring intervention in the mainstreaming process. Some key issues arising from the workshops were the need for implementation of the plans, limited climate risk screening and the need for more climate change expertise in the sectors. It was gratifying to see the enthusiasm and interest from stakeholders and the eagerness to move the process forward.

Have you shared the results of the scoring workshop to a wider in-country stakeholder group (e.g. an annual multi-stakeholder national-level steering committee and/or stock-taking meeting on the implementation of the PPCR investment plan)?

The results were shared with in-country stakeholders, that is about 29 participants, representing Government, Private Sector, Civil Society Organisations and Academia (Attendance list has been attached). MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA

INTERIM CLIMATE CHANGE SECRETARIAT

ZAMBIA PILOT PROGRAMME ON CLIMATE RESILIENCE (PPCR) MONITORING AND REPORTING 2016

SUMMARY REPORT

SPCR Endorsement Date: 29th June, 2011

SPCR Completion Date: 31st December, 2019

Projects/ Programs: Strengthening Climate Resilience in Zambia and in the Barotse Sub-Basin Strengthening Climate Resilience in Zambia and in the Kafue Sub-Basin

JUNE, 2016 LUSAKA Table of Contents 1. Background ...... 3 2. Monitoring & Reporting (M&R) of Resilience in Zambia ...... 3 3. PPCR Core Indicator M&R Process ...... 4 4. Highlights of the Report ...... 5 5. Lessons Learnt in the M&R Process ...... 7 Appendices ...... 8

Page | 2

1. BACKGROUND The Interim Inter-Ministerial Climate Change Secretariat (ICCS) was established in 2012, to among other things, coordinate, the implementation of climate change activities and initiatives across sectors until such a time that a permanent institution was established. A multi-sectorial technical committee comprising representatives of key ministries, civil society and private sector was appointed to provide technical guidance to the ICCS. The portfolio of climate change initiatives being overseen by the Secretariat has grown significantly since its establishment.

The Pilot Programme for Climate Resilience (PPCR) is one of the climate initiatives that ICCS is facilitating and overseeing. The objective of the Zambia PPCR programme is to mainstream climate change into the most economically important and vulnerable sectors of the economy in order to ensure sustainable economic development towards the attainment of Zambia’s Vision 2030. The programme is designed to be implemented through existing Government systems at National, District and Local levels.

The Zambia PPCR was structured to be implemented in two-phases and included a Project Preparation Grant (PPG: 2012-2014). Phase I (June 2010 to September 2013) supported the formulation of a strategic programmatic framework for climate resilience. Phase I culminated into the design of a Strategic Programme for Climate Resilience (SPCR) which was adopted by the PPCR Sub-Committee in June 2011, and served as the blueprint for adaptation activities to be piloted in Phase II. Phase II (September 2013-2019), currently on-going, is centred on three strategic components: (i) Participatory Adaptation, (ii) Climate Resilient Infrastructure, and (iii) Strategic Programme Support.

2. MONITORING & REPORTING (M&R) OF RESILIENCE IN ZAMBIA The ICCS has been coordinating climate change activities and performing project management functions that comprise financial management and audit, monitoring and evaluation, environmental and social safeguards, procurement administration and communication. Monitoring & Reporting (M&R) of resilience in Zambia has progressed steadily in the last two years with more stakeholders being part of the process. Initially, participation and interest of stakeholders was limited. However, with increased awareness on climate resilience and on the role of various stakeholders need to play in the M&R process, interest and participation in the M&R process has increased significantly. This has been observed by the increase in the number stakeholders attending the scoring workshops and the validation workshops. Participation of private sector, however, has remained a challenge and could be enhanced if there are incentives expressly addressing climate change and resilience.

Additionally, the PPCR in Zambia is structured in a way that allows pilot adaptation sub-project monitoring and reporting to be carried out by targeted districts, using existing M&E systems. M&R by the District teams has been a challenge due to institutional and capacity inadequacies. Efforts have been made by ICCS to continuously address these challenges and issues. Some measures taken have included a two-week tailor-made Participatory M&E course by the University of Zambia for all District Planners in the targeted Districts, simplifying the reporting process and continually providing M&E backstopping to District teams.

Page | 3

The ICCS is also making efforts to ensure that the M&R process is integrated in the National M&E to ensure sustainability and government ownership of the process. Discussions are underway with the National Monitoring and Evaluation Department in the Ministry of National Development Planning to include climate finance amongst the activities being monitored using an online based tool (MMS) which tracks budgetary allocation and activities in various government Ministries. It is envisioned that by the end of the PPCR programme, monitoring and reporting of climate resilience will be fully integrated into the National M&Esystem.

3. PPCR CORE INDICATOR M&R PROCESS The monitoring and reporting on the PPCR core indicators involved in-country stakeholder groups participating in the stakeholder scoring workshops. The scoring criteria for the PPCR core indicator 1, 2 & 3 was developed through a stakeholder consultative process in 2014 and refined in 2015. This criteria guides the scoring and shows how to fill out the Monitoring and Reporting scorecards. A sample of the guide used is given in Appendix 1.

A total of 10 workshops were held at National, Sector and project level with about 91 stakeholders between May and June. The meetings had representatives from Government, Private Sector, Civil Society Organizations and Academia (the list of participants is been attached as Appendix II).

The process began with meeting stakeholders at project level project level from Kafue and Barotse Sub-Basins to establish results for project level indicator three (3). Workshops were held in Livingstone for the Kafue Sub Basin project and in Mongu for the Barotse Sub Basin project with a total of 47 stakeholders. The results for indicators four (4) and five (5) were also established and the results for the two projects aggregated.

At sector level, stakeholders with sector -specific knowledge, were met. The groups met ranged from 3-6 and a total, 25 stakeholders were met from 7 priority sectors, namely, Environment & Natural Resources, Agriculture (Livestock, Fisheries & Crops), Health, Transport & Infrastructure, Energy, Water and Tourism. There was a challenge with the Health sector as only one person scored because the sector was involved in missions at the time of scoring.

At national level, 23 stakeholders were part of the scoring process. To ensure that the results to be reported, were as close as possible to the reality on the ground, a multi-stakeholder workshop was held to critically review the findings with 29 participants.

Page | 4

Figure 1: Scoring Meeting

4. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REPORT 1. The following are some highlights of the Zambia PPCR M&R Core Indicator report: • Generally, several climate change initiatives were being undertaken before the PPCR programme commenced and have since been improved upon. • Considering the progress in the reporting period (January – December 2015), there is a lot more awareness on Climate Change issues with significant progress in integration climate change in the planning processes of various sectors. • Several studies and information on climate change, climate variability and climate resilience in various sectors have been conducted but there is need for improvement on accessibility to this information • Climate Change expertise and capacity building within the sectors was reported as a need in the sectors • There is need also to move from the planning process to actual implementation to ensure that there is impact from climate mainstreaming process

2. Key Successes in the period under implementation: ■ More sectors and ministries now have strategic plans with Climate Change considerations embedded in them. Some examples are: – National Agriculture Policy (2014-2018) – National Agriculture Investment Plan (NAIP) - 2013 investment plan for agriculture

Page | 5

– Ministry of Transport, Works, Supply & Communication (MTWSC) Strategic plan 2014-2016 – National Health Adaptation plan to climate change done in 2013 and approved in 2014 – Water Resource Management Act has some provision for climate change which could be strengthened – National policy for Environment (NPE) – National Bio-diversity Strategy Action Plan – 2014-2016 Rural Electrification Agency strategic plan has shifted from traditional approach to renewable energy approach

■ Almost all sectors now have specific programs promoting climate resilience e.g. – In the agriculture sector, provision of farmer support through the Farmer Input Support Programme (FISP) is linked to climate change impacts; also, a climate change adaptation project is being implemented under agriculture – In the infrastructure sector, there is a Green buildings programme being done by National Council for Construction (NCC) in partnership with International Labour Organisation (ILO); – In the water sector, there is a Water Resource Management project in the Kafue catchment area; and – With energy crisis the country faced in 2015, focus has shifted to renewable energy projects.

■ The process for development of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) for Zambia is currently in progress; ■ Most sectors and ministries now have budget allocation for climate issues and programs and the budget tracking tool developed by the ICCS has indicated that there has been a significant annual increase in these allocations from 2013-2015; ■ Most Sectors have a focal point person/s or are in the process of identifying someone responsible for coordinating mainstreaming Climate change issues

3. Challenges or areas of improvement identified include: ■ Some Ministries are in the process of revising their strategic plans and are also developing Master plans for their sectors' e.g. Ministry of Tourism. This creates an opportunity to leverage the process so as to ensure that Climate Resilience strategies are embedded in these planning documents; ■ There is limited screening of climate risks across all sectors. This has been mostly because of lack of screening guidelines. The ICCS is in the process of procuring a consultant to support the process ■ Most sectors and ministries have budget allocation for climate issues but need to monitor expenditure and activities to determine impact on climate change effects. ■ There is need for continuous stakeholder engagement and awareness raising/ sensitization on the climate change programme especially among the youth and academia; ■ There are limited national/sector incentives and legislative policies which expressly address climate change and resilience.

Page | 6

5. LESSONS LEARNT IN THE M&R PROCESS

i. When tools for monitoring and reporting are developed during the project design, it is important that they are piloted in the initial stages. This will help identify gaps, correct flaws and address challenges in the use of the tools. Additionally, there is need for flexibility in the early stages of implementation, to allow for modifications to the tools being used, so as to deal with realities on the ground and factors which seem to have been overlooked during the project design phase.

For the Zambia PPCR, these have included issues like the forms and templates outlined within the Participatory Adaptation Implementation Manuals (PAIM) being either inadequate or too complicated to be used, and or not taking into account the local language (need to translate the forms) as well as the literacy levels in the areas of implementation.

ii. Capacity building in M&R is a continuous process due to on-going staff movements and institutional changes within the Government system which can result in capacity deficiencies. In the two sub-basins (Kafue and Barotse) where the projects are being implemented, after the initial training on project implementation and procedures was conducted, district staff had to be re-trained because most of those initially trained had been transferred or were no longer working within the district.

iii. Because of the long term and transformative nature of climate change adaptation, monitoring and reporting on resilience should have a long term perspective. It is important that successes not only focus on whether programme outputs and outcomes are being achieved but also on how much behavior change (mind-set change) is taking place at all levels - National, District and community levels.

Page | 7

APPENDICES

Page | 8

APPENDIX I

REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE INTERIM CLIMATE CHANGE SECRETARIAT

A GUIDE TO FILLING THE PPCR MONITORING AND REPORTING SCORECARDS FOR ZAMBIA – Indicator 1, 2 & 3

APRIL, 2015 LUSAKA

Page | 9

PREAMBLE This document has been developed to a guide the filling of the Monitoring and Reporting scorecard for PPCR Core Indicators 1, 2 and 3. The guide covers the scoring process in order to provide a criteria for filling the Monitoring and Reporting scorecards.

It was developed as a result of a consultative process with Stakeholders from Government, Private Sector, Academia and Civil Society. The document also drew on the guide developed by Saint Lucia for filling the PPCR Monitoring and Reporting scorecard, the Implementation Guidance on the Participatory Monitoring and Reporting (PM&R) System for PPCR Phase II developed for Zambia by ESSA Technologies and RuralNet Associates and the 2015 PPCR Monitoring & Reporting toolkit.

GENERAL INFORMATION Baseline Information and Targets The baseline date is the endorsement date of the PPCR investment plan, which for Zambia was June 2011. Baseline data was established for core indicators 1 and 2, while the baselines for the indicators 3, 4, and 5 were zero (0) as these indicators measure new activity as a result of PPCR-funded interventions. Expected results were established for core indicators 4 and 5 and results for core indicators 1, 2 and 3 (the scorecards) are implicitly set at 10 (complete).

Scoring Whereas a simple Yes / No answer would result in either a 10 or 0 score respectively (e.g. for indicator Is there an approved climate change plan for the nation/sector?), an effective way of defining a 10 for other indicators may be to ask, “Where does Zambia ideally want to be?”

For example, when scoring Have climate resilience strategies been embedded in the central government’s / sector’s principal planning documents?, it is important to initially take stock of how many Government / sector planning documents in fact reference a climate resilience strategy (e.g. Zambia Climate Change Response Strategy). After having a sense of which planning documents already include climate resilience strategies, it would then be necessary to ask which planning documents currently do not – but should include climate resilience strategies.

A 10 should represent Zambia’s goal (i.e. total number of planning documents which should include climate resilience strategies), while the score given should represent the current number of planning documents which include climate resilience strategies.

Documentation It is vital that all documentation which form part of the scoring process is stored and maintained for future reference and to track the reasoning behind the scoring.

Page | 10

CORE INDICATOR 1: DEGREE OF INTEGRATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN NATIONAL PLANNING

1. Column B: Is there an Approved Climate Change Plan for Nation/ Sector? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No, does There is a Initial works/ Work on the The climate The climate Exists and is Exists, is Exists, is Exists and Yes, exists not exist definite plan discussion development change change approved, approved and approved and needs no and needs no for its taken place to of a plan/strategy is plan/strategy but is not functioning with functioning with significant improvement development formulate climate change in the data is in its draft being concrete concrete improvement and it is climate plan has collection, stage and is implemented examples of its examples of its and it is being change plan/ commenced consultation or yet to be implementation, implementation, also being implemented strategy but is review phase launched and but needs major but minor implemented progressing of its publicized improvements, improvements slowly formulation which have not are needed which been clearly have been identified. identified. Adapted from PPCR monitoring & Reporting Toolkit and Implementation Guidance on the Participatory Monitoring and Reporting (PM&R) System for PPCR Phase II by ESSA Technologies and RuralNet Associates.

Note that for the Zambian scenario, a climate change plan at national level cuts across the various sectors. The Climate Change plan refers to the National Climate Change Response Strategy (NCCRS).

2. Column C: Have Climate Resilience Strategies been embedded in the Central Government/ Sector’s Planning Documents? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No Plans are in Initial works/ Work to The national Some Most CR strategies are CR strategies CR strategies Yes, the climate place to discussion incorporate or sector plan components components embedded into are embedded are being national and resilience incorporate taken place to CR strategies is in the data of the of the government/ into government used to sector plans (CR) CR strategies incorporate into central collection, national or national or sector’s planning /sector’s inform have clear cut strategies into central CR strategies government/ consultation sector plan sector plan documents, and planning implementati CR strategies available government/ into central sector ‘s or review have have are being used in documents, and on of sector’s government/ principal phase of its strategies strategies planning are being used government principal sector’s planning formulation that target targeting decisions. but in planning /sector planning principal documents with key CR. CR. needs major decisions, but activities and documents planning has started components improvements, minor projects, with documents but progress to address which have not improvements considerable is slow CR been clearly are needed effect identified which have been identified Adapted from PPCR monitoring & Reporting Toolkit and Implementation Guidance on the Participatory Monitoring and Reporting (PM&R) System for PPCR Phase II by ESSA Technologies and RuralNet Associates

Page | 11

Achievement of Climate resilience strategies embedded in the following documents would constitute a score of 10: a) National Level • Climate Change Policy (drafted, approved and implemented) • National Development plans (mainstreamed) • REDD+ Strategy on deforestation

b) Sector level • Sectorial Strategic Plans • Mid Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) • Sectorial Policies

3. Column D: Has Responsibility been assigned to Institutions or Persons to Integrate Climate Resilience Planning? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No Plans are in Work has Responsibilit Responsibility Some of the Most of the Responsibilit Responsibility has Responsibility has No need to responsibil place to recently y has been has been identified identified y has been been assigned to been assigned to revise ity assign an commenced on identified identified with responsibilities responsibilitie assigned to institution/person institution/person roles/respo identified individual or budget but has yet only a few for integrating s for institution/p , supported by , supported by nsibilities nor institution programming to be assigned for climate integrating erson, approved budgets approved budgets of assigned with the and drafting assigned for integrating resilience climate supported and guided by and guided by personnel responsibilit TORs to integrating climate planning has resilience by approved appropriate appropriate or y for integrate climate climate resilience been assigned. planning has budgets and terms of terms of institutions integrating resilience resilience planning. been assigned. guided by references or job references or job involved in climate planning into planning appropriate descriptions, with descriptions, with climate resilience national terms of moderate impact great impact on resilience planning. development references on developmental planning planning, but is or job developmental planning progress is slow descriptions planning Adapted from PPCR monitoring & Reporting Toolkit

a) National Level • An identified institution should be identified and established b) Sector level • Focal point persons should be identified and nominated

Page | 12

4. Column E: Have Specific Measures to Address Climate Resilience been Identified and Prioritized? E.G. Investments and Program? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No Plans are in Work has Work has Specific Specific Specific measures Specific Specific Yes, specific No new specific place to recently recently measures measures (investments measures have measures have measures measures measures identify commenced begun on the (investments (investment & and programs) to been used in been used in have been are needed (investme specific on the identification & programs) programs) to address climate various various consistently to address nts and measures to identification of of measures to address address climate resilience have sectors, but sectors, but implemented climate programs) address measures to to address climate resilience have been identified and major minor across change to address climate address climate climate resilience been identified approved, but improvements improvements departmental climate resilience change change, but is has been and approved, application has not are needed, are needed activities resilience progress is identified, but have not been consistent which have which have slow but exist in been throughout been partially been identified draft implemented. government/ identified form sector activities Adapted from PPCR monitoring & Reporting Toolkit

The following could be considered e.g. • National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) • Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAS) • National Climate Change Response Strategy (NCCRS)

5. Column F: Do All Planning Processes Routinely Screen for Climate Risks? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No, planning Plans are in Guidelines The The authorities Yes, there has Mandatory Screening is Screening is Screening is Yes, processes do place to have been authorities have recently been some pilot mandated but mandated and mandated and screening is not routinely develop developed have begun to pilot screening application has conducted conducted consistently screen for screening for screening recently screen for screening for for Climate not been throughout throughout applied climate risks guidelines climate risks started to climate risks, Climate Change risks consistent departmental government/ across screen for with slow Change risks are throughout activities, but departmental departmenta climate risks progress in a selection conducted in national/ major activities but l activities, of projects, projects sector improvements minor with great but screening activities are needed improvements effectiveness is not which are are needed mandatory partially which have been identified identified Adopted from PPCR monitoring & Reporting Toolkit

Page | 13

CORE INDICATOR 2: EVIDENCE OF STRENGTHEN GOVERNMENT CAPACITY AND COORDINATION MECHANISM TO MAINSTREAM CLIMATE RESILIENCE

1. Column B: Are Information, Studies and Assessments Addressing Climate Change, Variability and Resilience Available? 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 No studies or A few of the required A few information, Some information, studies Most information, All information is readily assessments are information, studies studies or assessments or assessments are studies and assessments available and available or assessments are are available with readily available with only are readily available and updated/collected available but only some online or readily a few updated due to lack updated periodically. periodically upon request. available but are of periodic surveys or outdated. method of collection

Questions which can help come up with a score can include: Are electronic documents available on a website? Are hardcopy documents available in government offices, libraries and /or schools? Can ministries access these documents easily? Can normal citizens find these documents easily?

2. Column C: Is the Necessary Climate Change Expertise Available? 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 No climate Some Government / There are few At least one there is person Several persons in most Yes, there is adequate change expertise sector officials have persons who are in most departments who departments / sector who expertise in climate available. attended climate trained in climate has been trained and is have been trained and are change available in change training change resilience qualified in climate change qualified in climate change most agencies, and most courses. and are qualified resilience and has resilience, also have experts have good in climate change experience working on experience working on experience working on resilience climate change projects/ climate change projects climate change projects programs and programs. and programs Adopted from PPCR monitoring & Reporting Toolkit 2015

3. Column D: Do National/Sector Incentives and Legislative Policies Expressly Address Climate Change and Resilience? 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 There are no EITHER some Some incentives EITHER some National and sectoral Wide ranging incentives nor incentives OR some AND legislative incentives OR some incentives and legislative national/sector legislative policies legislative policies are policies are in legislative policies are policies in place and incentives and legislative in place to address available but indirectly place but available and expressly expressly address Climate policies expressly address Climate Change related to Climate indirectly address address Climate Change and Climate climate change resilience and Climate Change and Climate climate change. Change and Climate Resilience climate change and are fully implemented Resilience. Resilience. Resilience projects and programs. and updated as necessary Adopted from PPCR monitoring & Reporting Toolkit 2015

Page | 14

4. Column E: Does the Government/Sector Participate in the Coordination Mechanism? 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 No cross-sectoral Yes, there is a cross- A cross-sectional A cross-sectoral A cross-sectional A fully functional cross-sectoral coordination sectoral coordination coordination coordination coordination mechanism coordination mechanism for mechanism for mechanism however it mechanism for mechanism for for climate change climate change activities exist, climate change is not being utilized. climate change climate change activities exist active with all required activities exist activities exist with activities exist with sharing of information sectors/government agencies some level of greater level of and some degree of sharing information and participation participation coordinated planning coordinating on an ongoing basis. Adopted from PPCR monitoring & Reporting Toolkit 2015

5. Coordination Mechanism The scoring is subjective and should be answered based on one’s discretion.

Page | 15

CORE INDICATOR 3: QUALITY AND EXTENT TO WHICH CLIMATE RESPONSIVE INSTRUMENTS/INVESTMENT MODELS ARE DEVELOPED AND TESTED

1. Column B: Climate Responsive Instrument/ Investment Models Identified:

S/N Barotse Sub-Basin Kafue Sub-Basin 1 Climate Resilient Sub-Grants Climate Resilient Roads 2 Climate Risk Assessments Micro Projects 3 Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) Technological Packages (farm level systems support) 4 Rehabilitation of Canals to operate at near Medium – Large Scale Investment Projects optimum flow 5 Climate Risk Maps Climate Change Training sessions 6 Contingency Adaptation Fund Integrated Development Plans (IDPs)

This indicator complements Core Indicator 4 “Extent to which vulnerable households, communities, businesses, and public sector services use improved PPCR supported tools, instruments, strategies, and activities to respond to climate variability or climate change.”

The climate responsive instruments / investment models identified should align with those identified for Core Indicator 4.

2. Column C: Has the Instrument/ Investment Model been Developed and Tested? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No, Plans are in Work has Work Development Instrument/ Instrument/ Instrument/ Instrument/ Instrument/ Yes, instrument/ place to just begun to of instrument Investment Investment Investment Investment Model Investment Model Instrument/ Investment develop commenced develop / Investment Model has Model has Model has has been has been Investment Model has Instrument on to Instrument/ Model is been been been developed, and is developed, and is Model has not been / developing Investment almost developed but developed, developed, and being tested, but being tested, but been developed Investment Instrument/ Model, but finalized not tested. and starting is being tested major minor developed and tested Model Investment progress is to be tested but progress is improvements improvements and tested Model slow slow are needed are needed which successfully which are have been partially identified identified

The scoring is should be done based on evidence and facts existing and documented from the ground in the project area.

Page | 16

3. Column D: Has the Instrument/ Investment Model been Implemented to the Scale Proposed? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No, Plans are in Implementati Implementati Implementati Implementati Instrument/ Instrument/ Instrument/ Implementation Implementati instrument/ place to on of on of on of on of Investment Investment Investment Model of Instrument/ on of Investment begin Instrument/ Instrument/ Instrument/ Instrument/ Model is Model is is implemented Investment Model Instrument/ Model has implementa Investment Investment Investment Investment implemented implemented to proposed scale is consistent Investment not been tion of Model has Model has Model is less Model is to proposed to proposed but minor across project Model is implemente Instrument just just than 50% of more than scale but has scale but major improvements area, with great successfully d to / commenced commenced, the proposed 50% of the not been improvements are needed which effectiveness finalized in proposed Investment but progress scale proposed consistent are needed have been Project Area scale Model is slow scale throughout which are identified project area partially identified

The scoring is should be done based on evidence and facts existing and documented from the ground in the project area.

4. Column E: Has the Instrument/ Investment Model Appropriately Incorporated the Needs of both Females and Males into its Design and Implementation?

0 3 5 7 10 Instrument/ Investment Model Instrument/ Investment Model Instrument/ Investment Model Instrument/ Investment Model Investment Model does not incorporate needs of has incorporated needs of has incorporated needs of incorporate needs of BOTH incorporate needs of males and females in its design EITHER males OR females in EITHER males OR females in males AND females in its BOTH males AND and implementation its design OR implementation its design AND implementation design OR implementation females in its design AND implementation

The scoring is should be done based on evidence and facts existing and documented from the ground in the project area.

5. Column F: Has the Instrument/ Investment Model Incorporated the Needs of Vulnerable Populations into its Design and Implementation? 0 3 5 7 10 Instrument/ Investment Model Instrument/ Investment Model Instrument/ Investment Instrument/ Investment Model Instrument/ Investment does not incorporate the needs has incorporated the needs of Model has incorporated the has incorporated the needs of Model has incorporated the of vulnerable population in its SOME vulnerable population in needs of MOST vulnerable MOST vulnerable population needs of ALL vulnerable design and implementation its design OR implementation population in its design OR in its design AND population in its design implementation implementation AND implementation

The scoring is should be done based on evidence and facts existing and documented from the ground in the project area.

Page | 17

APPENDIX II:

PPCR CORE INDICATORS SCORING WORKSHOPS - Attendance Lists

PROJECT LEVEL

1. STRENGTHENING CLIMATE RESILIENCE IN KAFUE SUB-BASIN (SCRIKA) PROJECT – 13TH MAY 2016 SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION CONTACT EMAIL 1 Akatama Malikana District Admin Cent District Admin Officer 0977647881 [email protected] 2 Sampa Chiyenge Mazabuka Municipal Council District Planning Officer 0977893003 [email protected] 3 Lubinda Mwala Shibuyunji D. Council District Planning Officer 0979722683 [email protected] 4 Kabimba Ryder Chibombo Council District Planning Officer 0975757571 [email protected] 5 Chipego Mudenda Kafue Council District Planning Officer 0977500522 [email protected] 6 Anne Mtamboh PPC – Lusaka province Chief Planner 0975572772 [email protected] 7 Robert Tembo Choma Council District Planning Officer 0977577976 [email protected] 8 Vincent Sikanyeela District Administration District Admin Officer 0977472401 [email protected] 9 Kenneth Chinyama District Administration District Admin Officer 0978160011 [email protected] 10 Mazuba U. Brave District Adin Chobomba District Admin Officer 0977380805 [email protected] 11 Hampende Charles District Admin Mumbwa District Admin Officer 0977838550 [email protected] 12 Ngoni Moyo District Admin District Admin Officer 0966809133 [email protected] 13 Joseph Kamana District Admin Shibuyunji District Admin Officer 0977882593 [email protected] 14 Anthony G. Phiri Namwala District Council District Planning Officer 0979066663 [email protected] 15 Diana Samakesa Itezhi tezhi Council Community Dev Officer 0977118206 [email protected] 16 Bbalo M. Goretti District Admin Monze District Admin Officer 0976915586 [email protected] 17 Hope M. Chiposo District Admin Choma District Admin Officer 0977968175 [email protected] 18 Timothy Mulenga District Admin District Admin Officer 0977870168 [email protected] 19 Exhildah Haaninga Pemba District Council District Planning Officer 0977581516 [email protected] 20 Mpongwe M. Gabriel PPV Council Chief Planner 0973719749 [email protected]

2. STRENGTHENING CLIMATE RESILIENCE IN BAROTSE SUB-BASIN (SCREBS) PROJECT – 26th MAY 2016 SN NAME ORGANISATION TITLE Tel. No. E-mail address 1 Misheck Washanga Education Mwandi District Planning Officer 0979 469296 [email protected] 2 Mukape Mandandi Liwzai Mwandi Community member 0977 22 0471 3 Kaswela Mwamba Limulunga council District Planning Officer 0977 238389 [email protected] 4 Mutonga Wamolume Kalabo council Assistance Planner 0978-685780 [email protected] 5 Kawilila Kaswela Mitete District District Admin Officer 0977 322837 [email protected]

Page | 18

SN NAME ORGANISATION TITLE Tel. No. E-mail address 6 Munalula Imonga Shangombo district District Planning Officer 0966 406426 [email protected] 7 George Lishwani Lizazi village chairperson 0963 690135 8 Noola Mass MOCTA Technical Ass Officer 0977 546662 [email protected] 9 Simwangala Bwalya CBNRM Kazungula craf 0974 373072 [email protected] 10 Munsaka M. Banda Senanga Council District Planning Officer 0977 244947 [email protected] 11 Kaumba Mwananyambe NACRO Climate Risk Adap Facilitator 0977 673079 [email protected] 12 Esther M Nyambe Mbeta Island chairperson 0979 685335 13 Mubiana Likando CELIM P.manager 0977 423603 [email protected] 14 Mabunga Ronald Caritas Mongu Director 0979 322175 [email protected] 15 Wamuwi Clement A Sioma PAT 0976 209431 [email protected] 16 Allan Chinambu CGAZ CRAF-Sioma/Mwandi 0977 429666 [email protected] 17 Loveness Mutakwa KZF CRAF/lukulu & Mitete 0979 548669 [email protected] 18 Eugene Lubinda CELIM Climate Risk Adap Facilitator 0973 5335665 [email protected] 19 Mukuni Kapumpa SCReBs Admin Asst 0966 599749 [email protected] 20 Chibalanga Nga’mbi MOA District Agric Coordinator 097729947 [email protected] 21 Namukolo Like Buildings District Works Suppervisor 0977 21 3823 [email protected] 22 Kekelwa Mundia Mumwa Craft Climate Risk Adap Facilitator 0977 810160 [email protected] 23 Muwela Muyumbana MODFA Climate Risk Adap Facilitator 096 3365861 24 Gezile Phiri Kaoma council Participatory Adap Trainee 0969 736474 [email protected] 25 Namushi Nathaniel Lukulu council District Planner 0977 973648 [email protected] 26 Adrick Nyondo Nalolo council Ag/ District Planning Officer 0968 262056 [email protected] 27 Diana Mukamba SCReBs PAT 0978855968 [email protected] 28 Doreen C. Bwalya National Climate Change Participatory Adap Trainee 0977804365 [email protected] Secretariat 29 Namukolo Mulele Sesheke District Council District Planning Officer 0964066722 [email protected] 30 James Namonda PPCR-PIU Infrastructure Engineer 0968247991 [email protected] 31 Jean Mukumwa National Climate Change M& E Officer 0974 032216 Secretariat 32 Martin Sishekanu National Climate Change Participatory Adaption Specialist 0955 570623 [email protected] Secretariat 33 Joseph C. Mwansa PPCR-PIU Intern 0978521984 [email protected] 34 Maina Akabondo PPCR PIU M& E Officer 0955429535 [email protected]

Page | 19

SECTORS

1. INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORT SECTOR 6TH JUNE 2016 SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION PHONE No. EMAIL 1 Victor Kunda National Construction Council MCS 0977323933 [email protected] 2 Stan Muwowo TEVETA CD Specialist 0977576297 [email protected] 3 Humphrey Simfukwe Dept. of Public Infrastructure Senior Architecture 0979419639 [email protected] 4 Richard M. Kangwa Ministry of Local Government and P PER-R 0977410571 [email protected] Housing 5 Elita Nkhowani Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Intern 0967462995 [email protected] 6 Jean Mukumwa Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Officer 0974032216 [email protected] 7 Doreen C. Bwalya Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Specialist 0977804365 [email protected]

2. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES SECTOR 7TH JUNE 2016 SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION PHONE No. EMAIL 1 Alimakio Zulu Zambia CBNRM Forum National Coordinator 0977704114 [email protected] 2 Bernard Chilesh University of Zambia Lecturer 0977319750 [email protected] 3 Agatha Shula Snow Systems Researcher 0973869009 [email protected] 4 Elita Nkhowani Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Intern 0967462995 [email protected] 5 Jean Mukumwa Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Officer 0974032216 [email protected] 6 Doreen C. Bwalya Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Specialist 0977804365 [email protected]

3. ENERGY SECTOR 9TH JUNE 2016 SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION PHONE No. EMAIL 1 Levy Siaminwe UNZA Assistant Dean 0966745064 [email protected] 2 Andrew Chilala Rural Electrification Authority M & E Officer 0977601848 [email protected] 3 Leah Banda Rural Electrification Authority Senior Planning Engineer 0966935937 [email protected] 4 Nancy S. Ng’oma CEEEZ Coordinator 0966853505 [email protected] 5 Elita Nkhowani Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Intern 0967462995 [email protected] 6 Jean Mukumwa Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Officer 0974032216 [email protected] 7 Doreen C. Bwalya Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Specialist 0977804365 [email protected] 8 Keeman Saboi CEEEZ Intern 0968710528 [email protected]

Page | 20

4. WATER SECTOR 10TH JUNE 2016 SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION PHONE NO. EMAIL 1 Abel Manangi MLGH PE-RWSS 0977493475 [email protected] 2 Saul Banda Water Aid HoP 0978668311 [email protected] 3 Maybin Ng’ambi World vision WASH Manager 0974197846 maybin_ng’[email protected] 4 Mendai I. Kwashimbisa Water Aid Policy and Advisory Manager 0977812432 [email protected] 5 Elita Nkhowani ICCS M & E Intern 0967462995 [email protected] 6 Jean Mukumwa ICCS M & E Officer 0974032216 [email protected] 7 Doreen C. Bwalya ICCS MES 0977804365 [email protected] 8 Manfred S. Kayivwa NWASCO Tech Inspector 0966841284 [email protected]

5. TOURISM SECTOR 13TH JUNE 2016 SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION PHONE No. EMAIL 1 Musso Munyeme University of Zambia-VET Lecturer 0955751013 [email protected] 2 Lydia Kawatu Minstry of Toursim and Art Planner 0977336173 lydiakawatu.yahoo.com 3 Chilufya Edward K National Parks & Wildlife Principal Natural Resources 0977765020 [email protected] Mgt Officer 4 Elita Nkhowani Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Intern 0967462995 [email protected] 5 Jean Mukumwa Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Officer 0974032216 [email protected] 6 Doreen C. Bwalya Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Specialist 0977804365 [email protected]

6. AGRICULTURE SECTOR 14TH JUNE 2016 SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION PHONE No. EMAIL 1 Raynolds K. Shula Min. of Agriculture Principal Agric Specialist 0977770825 [email protected] 2 Victor Malumani Zambia National Farmers Union Senior Manager – Infor 0977159181 [email protected] &Communication 3 Cliff Dlamini Indaba for Agric and Policy Research Institute Research Fellow 0962065706 [email protected] 4 Chimuka Samboko Indaba for Agric and Policy Research Institute Research Associate 0977481225 [email protected] 5 Mwimbu Ngoma Heifer P.M.E Officer 0966546486 [email protected] 6 Mutinta J. Malambo Zambia Agric Research Institute Research Scientists 0977685416 [email protected] 5 Elita Nkhowani Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Intern 0967462995 [email protected] 6 Jean Mukumwa Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Officer 0974032216 [email protected] 7 Doreen C. Bwalya Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Specialist 0977804365 [email protected]

Page | 21

NATIONAL LEVEL

1. NATIONAL (NATIONAL SCORING) STAKEHOLDERS 21st JUNE 2016 SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION PHONE No. EMAIL 1 Chama Nambeya Interim Climate Change Secretariat Communications & 0975282300 [email protected] Admin Manager 2 Kasenga Hara National Water Supply and Sanitation Senior Inspector 0955751982 [email protected] Council. 3 Chimbala Yoyo MFL-PPD Economist 0975666462 [email protected] 4 Nancy Serenje Ng’oma Center for Energy, Environment and Coordinator 0966853505 [email protected] Engineering of Zambia (CEEEZ) 5 Lydia Kawatu Ministry of Tourism and Arts Planner 0977336173 [email protected] 6 Serah Masonde Ministry of Tourism and Arts Ag. Planner 0964600407 [email protected] [email protected] 7 Douty Chibamba University of Zambia Lecturer 0974567744 [email protected] 8 P. Mubita Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit R/Coordinator 0977408636 [email protected] 9 Mulongoti Alick. U Ministry of Transport and Communication Senior Planner 0971471351 [email protected] 10 Kanyata Chilembo Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and EMO 0976507521 [email protected] Environmental Protection 11 Chimba Muluka Department of Water Affairs SWE 0977452632 [email protected] 12 Joseph K. Kanyanga Zambia Meteorological Department Ag. Director 0977698781 [email protected] 13 Elita Nkhowani Interim Climate Change Secretariat MEI 0967462996 [email protected] 14 C. Shepande University of Zambia Lecturer 0975443585 [email protected] 15 Leah Banda Rural Electrification Authority Senior Planner 0977379449 [email protected] 16 Andrew Chilala Rural Electrification Authority M & E Officer 0977602848 [email protected] 17 Kezman Saboi Center for Energy, Environment and Intern 0978710528 Engineering of Zambia (CEEEZ) 18 Kenneth Kaoma Strengthening Climate Resilience in the Kafue M & E Officer 0977888977 [email protected] Sub basin. 19 Shadreck Mpanga University of Zambia Lecturer 0968083850 [email protected] 20 Reynolds K. Shula Ministry of Agriculture -DOA PAS-ALOP 0977770825 [email protected] 21 Charles T. Kaira Ministry of Health EHO 0977529248 [email protected] 22 Choolwe Milambo Green Living Monvement Program Officer 0977547622 [email protected] 23 Martin N. Sishekanu Interim Climate Change Secretariat PAS 0977570623 [email protected] 24 Doreen C. Bwalya Interim Climate Change Secretariat MES 0977804365 [email protected] 25 Isaac C. Nshimbi CIEWS/UNDP Admin Associate 0966719842 [email protected] 26 Edson Nkonde Zambia Meteorological Department Principal Meteorologist 0950447111 [email protected] 27 Oscar Silembo Water Management Authority Manager 0977863089 [email protected]

Page | 22

SN NAME INSTITUTION POSITION PHONE No. EMAIL 28 Jean Mukumwa Interim Climate Change Secretariat M & E Officer

2. QUALITY ASSURANCE & VALIDATION WORKSHOP – 23rd JUNE 2016 SN NAME POSITION INSTITUTION PHONE No EMAIL 1 Martin N. Sishekanu Participatory Adaptation Interim Climate Change Secretariat 0977570623 [email protected] Specialist 2 Choolwe Milambo Project Officer Green Living Movement 0977547622 [email protected] 3 Annie Banda Chandipo Snr. Energy Officer MEND-Dept of Energy 0979400771 [email protected] 4 Chimba Mukuka SWE MEWD-Dept of Water Affairs 0977452632 [email protected] 5 Kenneth Kaoma M&E Officer Strengthening Climate Resilience in the Kafue 0977888977 [email protected] Sub basin 6 Elita Nkhowani M&E Intern Interim Climate Change Secretariat 0967462995 [email protected] 7 Mutinta Kalembwe Planner PPU LUSAKA 0966954798 [email protected] 8 Anne L. Mtamboh Chief Planner Lusaka Province 0975572772 [email protected] 9 Barnabas Chishimba Internal Auditor Interim Climate Change Secretariat 0977796405 [email protected] 10 Mpongwe M. Gabriel Chief Planner Central Province 0973719749 [email protected] 11 Samuel Mwale Hydro Tech Zambezi River Authority 0977801307 [email protected] 12 Linda Siwale Chief Planner Provincial Planning Unit - Southern 0977807423 [email protected] 13 Barry R. Kaambwa Deputy Director DMIW – Ministry of Transport of 0977/66/55 [email protected] Communication 452125 14 Jean Mukumwa M&E Officer Interim Climate Change Secretariat 0974032216 [email protected] 15 Simon Mwamba Coordinator Eastern and Southern African Farmers Forum 09655900567 [email protected] 16 Doreen Bwalya M&E Specialist Interim Climate Change Secretariat [email protected] 17 David Kaluba National Cordinator Interim Climate Change Secretariat [email protected] 18 Michael Inambao Chief Planner PPU Western 0955851682 [email protected] 19 Cecilia Mwengwe Principal Planner Min Local Government and Housing –PPH 0977312022 [email protected] 20 Patrick Ngalande Director Dept. of Fisheries 0977887300 [email protected] 21 Allan Dauchi Ag PNRMO Min of Lands Natural Resources and 0963602335 [email protected] Environmental Protection 22 Marjorie M. Lusaka Water Engineer MEWD-Dept of Water Affairs 0975669467 [email protected] 23 Chizumba Shepande Lecturer Lecturer 0975443488 [email protected] 24 Mbewe Saul Surveyor of Vessels Maritime – Ministry of Transport and Co 0977773269 [email protected] 25 Muyumbwa Ndiyoi Chief Natural Heritage National Heritage and Conservation 0975112523 [email protected] Officer Commission 26 Serah Masonde Ag Principal Ministry of Tourism 0964600407 [email protected] [email protected]

Page | 23

27 Auxilia Kambani Snr. Planner Ministry of Works and Supply 0977838421 [email protected] 28 George W. Sikuleka Project Manager Strengthening Climate Resilience in the 0977777573 [email protected] Barotse Sub basin 29 Maina Akabondo M&E Officer Strengthening Climate Resilience in the 0955429535 [email protected] Barotse Sub basin

Page | 24