Zambia PPCR Investment Plan

Zambia PPCR Investment Plan

PPCR Monitoring and Reporting Zambia PPCR Investment Plan Annual Reporting Period From: January 1, 2015 To: December 31, 2015 Projects: ID No. XPCRZM041A Title Strengthening Climate Resilience (PPCR Phase II) Project XPCRZM042A Strengthening Climate Resilience in the Kafue Sub-Basin PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 PPCR Scorecard 1 Date of Report: . June 30, 2016 PPCR Core Indicator 1: Degree of integration of climate change into national planning Data Collection Method: Data scored at the country level Zambia PPCR Investment Plan Reporting Period: From: January 1, 2015 To: December 31, 2015 Complete below the sectors identified as a priority in the PPCR Is there an approved climate Have climate resilience strategies been Has responsibility been assigned to Have specific measures to address climate investment plan. Insert other priority sectors or ministries change plan for the nation/ embedded in the central government's/ institutions or persons to integrate resilience been identified and prioritized? e.g. Do all planning processes routinely below(optional) sector? sector's principal planning documents? climate resilience planning? investments and programs screen for climate risks? b c d e f Score- 2014 Score- 2014 Score- 2014 Score- 2014 Score-2015 Score- 2014 reporting period Score-2015 a reporting period reporting period Score-2015 reporting period reporting period Score-2015 reporting period reporting period (last Score-2015 reporting reporting period (last year) reporting (last year) (last year) (new) (last year) (new) year) period (new) (new) period (new) National Planning 5 5 7 7 6 7 6 6 3 5 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. No change from the previous year. The draft The Interim Inter-Ministerial Climate No change from the previous year. Specific There is an increase from the previous reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please The National Climate Response Climate Change policy was being worked on Change Secretariat (ICCS) was in place to measures (investments and programs) to address year's score because screening for Climate explain! Strategy (NCCRS) is still in draft form, after receiving comments from stakeholders coordinate climate change activities until climate resilience have been identified and Change risks is done in a selection of awaiting the approval of the Climate and is awaiting cabinet approval. A Climate permanent institutional arrangements approved, but application has not been consistent projects, though not consistently across Change policy although a number of proofing manual has been developed to assist were put in place. These were awaiting throughout government sectors. However, procurement process its recommendations are being in mainstreaming efforts finalization and approval of the climate for consultancy to develop screening implemented. change policy. guidelines for priority sectors by ICCS ongoing Environment and Natural Resources 6 7 7 8 6 6 3 4 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores A number of planning documents in the sector There was an increase from the previous No change from the previous year,. Some There is an increase from the previous reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please have CR strategies embedded, hence the year's score because responsibility has programs and investments in place e.g. the NAMAs year's score because screening for climate explain! increase in score. Climate Change has been been assigned to focal persons supported is currently under development. The sector also risks in planning has started but is not embedded in the sectorial strategic plan, by approved budgets successfully facilitated the finalization of Zambia's consistent across the sector National Bio diversity Strategy action Plan Internally Determined Contributions (INDCs) for (NBSAP), though National Policy on submission to COP 21 Environment has very limited information on Climate Change. The REDD+ strategy on deforestation has been done and approved. The National Forestry Policy (2014) also has climate change considerations embedded Agriculture (Livestock, Fisheries and Crops) 8 8 7 8 7 7 5 5 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. The National Officers have been appointed as focal No change from the previous year. Some programs No change from the previous year. There reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please Agriculture Policy (2014) has climate change point persons and been assigned to ensure and investments in place however not to scale, e.g. has been some pilot screening for Climate explain! strategies embedded; the National Agriculture climate resilience planning and this is the Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Change risks in a selection of projects, but Investment Plan (NAIP) 2013 also addresses supported by budgets and job descriptions Project is limited in scope, that is, was only piloted screening is not mandatory across the Climate Change. hence increase from last year's score in a few districts, and the PPCR participatory sector adaptation is being piloted in 25 districts. There are 103 districts in Zambia. The sector is also implementing a climate smart agriculture project with support from FAO. Health 7 7 7 7 6 7 5 5 PPCR Core Indicator Monitoring and Reporting Tools March 2014 Page 2 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. Climate No change from the previous year. Officers Some programs and investments in place, e.g. No change from the previous year. There reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please Change embedded in the National Health policy have been appointed as focal point Unintended Persistent Organic Pollutants (UPOP) has been some pilot screening for Climate explain! (2013); National Health Adaptation plan to persons and been assigned to ensure projects (GEF/UNDP), Zambia Health Services Change risks in a selection of projects, but climate change (regional plan to which Zambia climate resilience planning, supported by Improvement project (WB), Environmental screening is not mandatory across the is party) done in 2013 and approved in 2014; budgets Safeguards in Malaria control. Also, National sector Epidemic preparedness response (EPR) plans Adaptation Plans (NAPs) for Health being which take into account CC. developed hence the increase from the previous year's score. Transport and Infrastructure 8 8 6 4 5 5 7 8 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. The Sectorial There was a decrease from the previous No change from the previous year. Some programs There is an increase from the previous reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please Strategic Plan (2014-2016) for the Ministry of year because the Ministry of Transport, and investments in place including PPCR year because screening mandated in the explain! Transport, Works, Supply and Communication Works, Supply and Communication was investments (PPCR Component: Climate resilient sector as infrastructure planning & design developed and has climate change divided into the Ministry of Works and infrastructure and NDF Developing Climate usually accounts for worst case scenario considerations embedded in it. Supply and the Ministry of Communication Resilient Infrastructure Standards and Codes (including extreme events). & Transport in the period under review. Project). Also Green Jobs/ Buildings being done by Responsibility has been identified with National Council for Construction (NCC) in only a few assigned for integrating climate partnership with International Labor Organisation resilience planning (ILO). Energy 6 6 4 4 5 5 3 1 How do you Justify increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. Energy No change from the previous year. No change from the previous year. Specific There is a reduction from the previous reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year 2015? Briefly policy 2008 and the Rural Electrification Agency Responsibility has been identified with measures (investment & programs) to address year because the sector is now in the describe with evidence. (REA) Master plan (2008) has CR strategies only a few assigned for integrating climate climate resilience have been identified, approved process of developing guidelines for embedded in them which are being used in the resilience planning and are being implemented e.g. ZESCO has screening climate risks planning process. Also the 2014-2016 Strategic embarked on some Renewable Energy Based Plan for REA has shifted from a traditional Electricity Generation for Mini-Grids, Rural energy approach to renewable energy approach Electrification Agency (REA) implementing some of the work agreed under the NAMAs i.e. rural electrification. Tourism 4 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores No change from the previous year. The Sectorial No change from the previous year. Plans No change from the previous year. Work has No change from the previous year. Plans reported last year (2014) and scores reported this year (2015) ? Please Strategic Plan does not have climate change are in place to assign a focal point person commenced to identify measures to address are in place to develop climate risk explain! considerations

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    41 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us