Ammunition Reload Requirements of LAV Primary Weapon System Options

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ammunition Reload Requirements of LAV Primary Weapon System Options Ammunition Reload Requirements of LAV Primary Weapon System Options Geoff Pond, Ph.D., P.Eng. Land Capability Development OR Team Defence Research and Recherche et développement Development Canada pour la défense Canada Canada 1 Outline • Introduction – Current Medium-Weight Vehicle Capability – Weapon System Alternatives • Reload Requirements – Binomial Statistics – Monte Carlo Simulation – Wargaming • Conclusions Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO 2 Light Armoured Vehicle (LAV) – III with Delco Turret Entered in Service : 1998 Crew : 3 Dismounts : 7 Weapons : 25mm Dual Feed Cannon 7.62 Coaxial Machine-Gun 7.62 Pintle Mounted Machine-Gun Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO The third generation light armoured vehicle (LAV III) is the cornerstone of Canadian Army mounted operations. The LAV III is a wheeled infantry fighting vehicle as shown on this slide. This vehicle is crewed by three soldiers: a driver, gunner, and vehicle commander. In addition, seven soldiers occupy the rear passenger compartment. These soldiers may be dismounted to deliver more firepower on an opposition force, if required. 3 LAV III Inventory 310 Infantry Section Carrier (ISC) Variant + 180 Command Post Variant + 50 Forward Observation Officer Variant 540 LAV IIIs with Delco Turrets 33 LAV Less Kits (LKs) being converted to ISC w/ Nanuk Remote Weapon Stations Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO Currently, approximately 540 LAV III vehicles exist in the army inventory. The majority of these vehicles entered into service in 1998. To date, they have endured ten years of intense use, both during training and military operations. To extend its life and upgrade the vehicle to perpetuate its battlefield significance, a mid-life refit is currently being planned. As part of this refit, consideration is being given to replacing the vehicle’s turret. The Delco turret which is mounted on the vehicle houses a 25mm cannon, a co- axial 7.62mm machine gun, a pintle-mounted 7.62 machine gun, and two clusters of four 76mm smoke grenade launchers. The vehicle’s primary weapon system is the 25mm cannon which can shoot either in single-shot, or burst modes. Various 25mm ammunition types are fired by this weapon system but only two varieties are commonly employed on operations. To defeat lightly armoured or hardened targets, an armour-piercing fin stabilised discarding-sabot (APFSDS) round is employed. The alternative is a High Explosive Incendiary (HEI) round where the fuze detonates on impact and distributes an incendiary compound which burns flammable materials within a 5m radius. Use of both rounds can be accommodated by a primary and secondary ammo bin which feed the cannon. For example, the primary bin may be loaded with HEI and the secondary bin loaded with APFSDS rounds. Depending on the target, the gunner chooses the type of round that is most appropriate, by the flick of a switch. The primary bin contains 150 ready-rounds and the secondary bin contains 60 ready- rounds. When all ammunition has been expended, the ammo bins are restocked by the turret crew from inside the vehicle. 4 LAV III – Nanuk RWS Nanuk RWS LAV III - Nanuk • 33 LAV LK’s ISC • mounts a .50 cal machine-gun • first unit delivered, full delivery expected fall 2009 • to be deployed on Taskforce 1-10 as the Force Protection unit for the Provincial Reconstruction Team Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO Recently, a limited number of Canadian LAV IIIs have been fitted with a remote weapon system named the Nanuk. An image of this system mounted on the vehicle is shown on this slide. A remote weapon station such as the Nanuk is controlled remotely by crew from under the protection of the vehicle armour. The major disadvantage of this type of system is that reloading the system is done from outside the vehicle, exposing the crew. 5 Study Question Given the ammunition usage and reload characteristics of each vehicle type, how many vehicles within a platoon will be available to engage opposition forces at any given time? Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO 6 Op Medusa Strength 2,000 1,200 Casualties 12 512 Captured 0 136 Longest Threat Period 4 hrs Largest Ammo Expenditure 600 rounds Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO A threat period of 4 hours with 600 rounds expended per vehicle was selected in order to replicate the worst case scenario as described by returns from an inquiry made in theatre through the Army Lessons Learned Centre (ALLC). For this engagement, friendly and opposition force strength and casualties are detailed in this slide’s table. 7 Simplifying Assumptions • No mechanical failures (stoppages, jams, etc) • No casualties • Reload requirements are randomly distributed throughout engagement • No ammunition management Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO The following slides detail a binomial probability model for the reload of the LAV III having either a Delco turret or a RWS. This basic model requires several simplifying assumptions. The most relevant of those assumptions are detailed on this slide. In addition to those, the following assumptions are also made: •The threat period is 4 hours •A LAV with RWS must withdraw 1km at a speed of 60km/hr prior to reloading •A LAV with RWS requires 10 minutes to reload •A turreted LAV reloads in place •A turreted LAV requires 2 minutes to reload •Each vehicle expends 600 rounds of ammunition during the engagement •The time for a withdrawn vehicle to regain situational awareness and reacquire a target when returning to the engagement is negligible •The ammo expenditure rate of each vehicle is independent of that of all other vehicles 8 Reload Time • RWS must have comparable calibre • RWS based on the ARX20 (Nexter) - 20mm - 100 round ammo box -Assumed to fire at same rate as 25mm Delco - Must withdraw 1km away from engagement in order to reload (to provide sufficient protection to gunner) Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO Some RWS include a 20mm or 25mm cannon, which is more similar to that currently part of the Delco turret. The ARX20 20mm RWS ammo bin fits 100 ready-rounds. Unlike the Delco turret, the weapon system is fed by a single ammo bin. This is typical of most RWS having a 20-to-25mm calibre cannon. Therefore, once 100 rounds have been fired, the system must be reloaded from outside the vehicle. To reload, the vehicle is expected to withdraw from an engagement to an area were the crew can safely exit the vehicle to access the RWS ammo bin. 9 Reload Probability 3( reloads )( 2min/ reload ) p = = 5.2 % turret 240 min 5( reloads )( 12 min/ reload ) p = = 25 % RWS 240 min Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO A threat period of 4 hours with 600 rounds expended per vehicle was selected in order to replicate the worst case scenario as described by returns from an inquiry made in theatre through the Army Lessons Learned Centre (ALLC). The 2 minute reload time for the turreted LAV is the standard reload time provided that a few rounds from the previous upload remain so that the new upload can be linked to it. Ten minutes to reload an RWS seemed appropriate provided by feedback from the ALLC and in consultation with staff who represent Army users in the development of future equipment acquisition. The probability of one of the vehicles reloading, p can be calculated as follows. For the Delco turret, 150 rounds can be uploaded to the primary bin. Assuming the vehicle's primary bin is full at the onset of the threat period, the vehicle requires three more uploads to reach the 600 round expenditure assumed to take place. The amount of time spent reloading is: 3 uploads × 2 minutes per upload = 6 minutes. Recall that the threat period is assumed to last four hours. The fraction of time spent reloading is therefore 6 minutes divided by 240 minutes = 0.025, i.e., 2.5%. This can be interpreted as “each LAV III having a Delco turret will spend 2.5% of the threat period reloading the ammo bins”. This process is repeated for the specifications of the RWS. 10 Calculations N x N −x P(x) = p 1( − p) x ( = ∪ = ) ( = ∪ = )− ( = ∩ = ) P RD 1 RR 1 P RD 1 RR 1 P RD 1 RR 1 Defence R&D Canada – CORA • R & D pour la défense Canada – CARO The binomial probability distribution may be used to model the expected number of vehicles available to engage targets. This model is based on a binary response indicating whether a vehicle is in the process of reloading, or not, where: N denotes the number of vehicles ( N = 4 for a platoon) x denotes the number of vehicles reloading p denotes the probability of one of the vehicles reloading Special caution must be taken when performing the calculations for a platoon having a mix of RWS vehicles and Delco Turret vehicles. In the Venn diagram on the left side, the union probability depicts the cases where either a) a vehicle with a Delco turret is reloading, b) a vehicle with an RWS is reloading, or c) both a vehicle with a Delco turret is reloading and a vehicle with an RWS is reloading. Since case c) corresponds to the scenario where two vehicles are reloading (not just one), we must remove this intersection area as depicted in the Venn Diagram on the right side.
Recommended publications
  • The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle
    Canadian Military History Volume 20 Issue 2 Article 4 2011 The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Frank Maas Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Maas, Frank "The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle." Canadian Military History 20, 2 (2011) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maas: Light Armoured Vehicle The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Frank Maas he seeds for Canada’s purchase Cadillac-Gage, but the owner of of the Light Armoured Vehicle Abstract: Since the 1970s, budget Swiss firm MOWAG, Walter Ruf, T constraints and debates over the (LAV) lie as far back as 1964, when tank’s relevance have prompted came to the Department of National the Defence White Paper called for the Canadian Forces (CF) to pursue Defence (DND) in Ottawa to present the creation of a force equipped with lighter, cheaper, and more flexible his company’s new vehicle design, a flexible, light, and air-transportable vehicles. The Light Armoured Vehicle the “Piranha.”7 DND indicated that vehicle to serve in UN missions. This (LAV), built in London, Ontario, has the vehicle must be built in Canada to been purchased in great numbers resulted in a confused reaction that to satisfy these demands, and it have a chance of winning the bid, and saw the Canadian Forces (CF) looking has largely succeeded.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gouvernementaux Canada
    Public Works and Government Services Travaux publics et Services 1 1 Canada gouvernementaux Canada RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: SIMULATION ENTITY MODELS Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amendment No. - N° modif. - TPSGC W8475-135211/B 006 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client Date Place du Portage, Phase III Core 0A1 / Noyau 0A1 W8475-135211 2014-03-20 Gatineau GETS Reference No. - N° de référence de SEAG Quebec PW-$$EE-048-26597 K1A 0S5 Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776 File No. - N° de dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME 048ee.W8475-135211 Time Zone SOLICITATION AMENDMENT Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin at - à 02:00 PM Fuseau horaire MODIFICATION DE L'INVITATION Eastern Daylight Saving on - le 2014-04-25 Time EDT F.O.B. - F.A.B. The referenced document is hereby revised; unless otherwise indicated, all other terms and conditions of the Solicitation Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: remain the same. Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur Friesen, Manon 048ee Ce document est par la présente révisé; sauf indication contraire, Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX les modalités de l'invitation demeurent les mêmes. (819) 956-1161 ( ) ( ) - Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Destination - des biens, services et construction: Comments - Commentaires Vendor/Firm Name and Address Instructions: See Herein Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Instructions: Voir aux présentes Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Delivery Offered - Livraison proposée Vendor/Firm Name and Address Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Issuing Office - Bureau de distribution Telephone No.
    [Show full text]
  • CANSOFCOM: Next Generation Fighting Vehicle – DEW Engineering Teams with Supacat by Greg Burton, DEW Engineering, Ottawa, Canada
    EYE ON INDUSTRY 4CANSOFCOM: Next Generation Fighting Vehicle – DEW Engineering Teams with Supacat by Greg Burton, DEW Engineering, Ottawa, Canada IN JULY 2019, the Department of National Defence (DND) announced the intention to procure approximate- ly 55 to 75 Next Generation Fighting Vehicles (NGFV) to replace the existing High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWV). The HMMWV are used by the Canadian Special Operations Forces Command (CANSOFCOM) for expeditionary operations. Formal industry engagement commenced with a Letter of Interest (LOI) and Request for Information (RFI) about the High Level Mandatory Requirements (HLMR) that had been developed for the new NGFV. The HLMR categories included survivability, lethality, mobility, electrical architecture, durability and sustain- ability, transportability, interoperability and reliability. To augment the information requested in the RFI, a voluntary Previous DEW work on armoured vehicles includes the Ar- Industry Vehicle Demonstration was offered for industry to moured Vehicle General Purpose (AVGP) Depot Level Inspection present their vehicles in an interactive environment with DND. and Repair (DLIR), the Leopard 1 Thermal Weapon Sight and Vehicles participating in the demonstration were expected to turret rebuild, the M113 Life Extension and the Wheeled Light best meet the HLMR, being mature and of high technology Armoured Vehicle (LAV) Life Extension. readiness. Logistics truck completions include the Medium Logistics The demonstration took place at Canadian Forces Base Vehicle
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV)
    Updated June 10, 2021 Marine Corps Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) What Is the Advanced Reconnaissance anti-armor capability to defeat close-in heavy armor Vehicle (ARV)? threats; According to the Marine Corps, the Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) aims to be a new armored precision-guided munitions (PGMs) to defeat threats vehicle family to replace the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) beyond the engagement range of threat systems; (Figure 1): Since the 1980s, the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) unmanned systems swarm capability to provide persistent, multifunction munitions; has supported Marine Air-Ground Task Force missions on the battlefield. While the LAV remains advanced, networked, multifunctional electronic warfare operationally effective, the life cycle of this system (EW ) capabilities; is set to expire in the mid-2030s…. The Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) [the LAV’s a modern command-and-control suite and a full range of replacement] will be highly mobile, networked, sensors to enhance and extend reconnaissance and transportable, protected, and lethal. The capability surveillance ranges; will provide, sensors, communication systems and lethality options to overmatch threats that have organic unmanned aerial and ground systems historically been addressed with more heavily (UAS/UGS) that can be deployed from the ARV; armored systems. The ARV will be an advanced combat vehicle system, capable of fighting for active and passive vehicle protection capabilities to information that balances competing capability sense, orient, classify, track, and defeat incoming demands to sense, shoot, move, communicate and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), anti-tank guided remain transportable as part of the naval missiles (ATGMs), and PGM threats with hard-and soft- expeditionary force.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Light Armoured Vehicle (LAV)
    CANUNCLASSIFIED Lightarmouredvehicle(LAV)occupantseated postures Capt.GabrielleChafe CaptTommyPoirier DRDC–ValcartierResearchCentre CplOlivierHamel CanadianArmedForces AdrienneSy DRDC–TorontoResearchCentre ThebodyofthisCANUNCLASSIFIEDdocumentdoesnotcontaintherequiredsecuritybannersaccordingtoDNDsecurity standards.However,itmustbetreatedasCANUNCLASSIFIEDandprotectedappropriatelybasedonthetermsandconditions specifiedonthecoveringpage. DefenceResearchandDevelopment Canada ReferenceDocument DRDC-RDDC-2020-D029 June 2020 CANUNCLASSIFIED CANUNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANTINFORMATIVESTATEMENTS ThisdocumentwasreviewedforControlledGoodsbyDefenceResearchandDevelopmentCanada(DRDC)usingtheScheduleto theDefenceProductionAct. Disclaimer:ThispublicationwaspreparedbyDefenceResearchandDevelopmentCanadaanagencyoftheDepartmentof NationalDefence.Theinformationcontainedinthispublicationhasbeenderivedanddeterminedthroughbestpracticeand adherencetothehigheststandardsofresponsibleconductofscientificresearch.Thisinformationisintendedfortheuseofthe DepartmentofNationalDefence,theCanadianArmedForces(“Canada”)andPublicSafetypartnersand,aspermitted,maybe sharedwithacademia,industry,Canada’sallies,andthepublic(“ThirdParties”).Anyuseby,oranyrelianceonordecisionsmade basedonthispublicationbyThirdParties,aredoneattheirownriskandresponsibility.Canadadoesnotassumeanyliabilityfor anydamagesorlosseswhichmayarisefromanyuseof,orrelianceon,thepublication. ThedatacollectedaspartofthisstudywasapprovedeitherbyDefenceResearchandDevelopmentCanada’sHumanResearch EthicsBoardorbytheDirectorGeneralMilitaryPersonnelResearch&Analysis’SocialScienceResearchReviewBoard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle
    Canadian Military History Volume 20 Issue 3 Article 9 2011 The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Ed Storey Canadian Expeditionary Forces Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Storey, Ed "The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle." Canadian Military History 20, 3 (2011) This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Storey: Light Armoured Vehicle The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Ed Storey s a military vehicle enthusiast make them cost effective and easier AI was quite excited to see the Abstract: In order to understand the to deploy. article by Frank Maas in Canadian purchase of military vehicles, one must The AVGP series of vehicles Military History dealing with the understand the vehicle and where it falls purchased by Canada in 1976 was in the evolution of vehicle procurement. Canadian Light Armoured Vehicle This article, written in response to an a 10.7 ton, 6 wheeled amphibious (LAV) series of vehicles (vol.20, earlier article in Canadian Military vehicle based on the Swiss Mowag no.2 Spring 2011). I was also keenly History by Frank Maas, examines the Piranha I. Canada bought three interested in the article as my Father chronology and motivations behind versions: the Cougar 76 mm Fire was stationed at CFB Petawawa in the Canadian acquisition of wheeled Support Vehicle, the Grizzly armoured fighting vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Security & Defence European
    a 7.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 1/2019 International Security and Defence Journal ISSN 1617-7983 • Armoured Vehicles www.euro-sd.com • UK Programmes • Armament Options • • US Army Armoured Systems • Armoured Ambulances • Tyre and Track Technology • Engineer Vehicles January 2019 • Crew Protection • Discreet Armour Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology The backbone of every strong troop. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles. When your mission is clear. When there’s no road for miles around. And when you need to give all you’ve got, your equipment needs to be the best. At times like these, we’re right by your side. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles: armoured, highly capable off-road and logistics vehicles with payloads ranging from 0.5 to 110 t. Mobilising safety and efficiency: www.mercedes-benz.com/defence-vehicles Editorial ARMOURED VEHICLES FOCUS Improved Protection for Vehicle-Borne Task Forces As always, most of us started the New Year with wishes for peace and happiness. However, in countless continued conflicts large and small, people are being killed, maimed or injured, landscapes and cultural treasures are being destroyed, defaced and damaged, and national assets and resources are being plundered and squandered. In land-based operations to defeat these threats and their accompanying realities, the focus falls on soldiers, security forces and first responders who – often at the risk of their own lives – protect people, enforce justice and guard assets on behalf of their governments. These are dangerous jobs, and there is a clear duty of care upon the employers for the health and well-being of their “human assets”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle
    The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Frank Maas he seeds for Canada’s purchase Cadillac-Gage, but the owner of of the Light Armoured Vehicle Abstract: Since the 1970s, budget Swiss firm MOWAG, Walter Ruf, T constraints and debates over the (LAV) lie as far back as 1964, when tank’s relevance have prompted came to the Department of National the Defence White Paper called for the Canadian Forces (CF) to pursue Defence (DND) in Ottawa to present the creation of a force equipped with lighter, cheaper, and more flexible his company’s new vehicle design, a flexible, light, and air-transportable vehicles. The Light Armoured Vehicle the “Piranha.”7 DND indicated that vehicle to serve in UN missions. This (LAV), built in London, Ontario, has the vehicle must be built in Canada to been purchased in great numbers resulted in a confused reaction that to satisfy these demands, and it have a chance of winning the bid, and saw the Canadian Forces (CF) looking has largely succeeded. The CF has the Swiss company solicited Diesel for a replacement tank for their troops purchased the LAV as a wheeled, Division General Motors (DDGM), in NATO while also trying to find a multi-purpose vehicle to fulfill a which had no military experience, variety of roles (infantry carrier, vehicle to serve with the UN, while but manufactured heavy equipment, medical evacuation vehicle, etc.), the government was not willing to that is cheaper and easier to maintain to do assembly and steel fabrication make the investment to procure either than tracked alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Brigade Combat Team
    US Army Brigade Combat Team Dr Carlo Kopp LAV III Stryker operating in Iraq, with anti-RPG mesh fitted. An ongoing criticism of the LAV in urban operations has been vulnerability to RPG fire, larger IEDs and difficulty negotiating very narrow streets. Proponents of the LAV argue that the vehicle is so quiet that opponents can often be surprised by their arrival. he US Army is reinventing itself through M1 Abrams tank, the M109 Paladin, the MLRS the most radical and deep force rocket artillery system, the Apache/Black Hawk structure changes in 60 years. These helicopters, and the Patriot SAM system all changes are in part a result of occupied niches in this model, which provided technological evolution and a result of mobile heavy forces intended to hold enemy changing styles of conflict. This offensives, and to provide a manoeuvre force Tprocess of change has resulted in the most capable of punching through layered Soviet style acrimonious argument observed in the US Defense defensive formations. debate in many decades. This revolutionary change This force structure aimed to break the Warsaw has lessons for Australia as its force grapples with Pact in a direct confrontation and execute the changing technology and complexity of conflict. 'Blitzkrieg' style operations. The land campaigns of In the US the debate is divided along two principal 1991 and 2003 in Iraq illustrated the capability of M1131 Stryker Fire Support Vehicle. The FSV is a sensor platform with a laser ranging / axes. The first axis is that of the heavy versus the such forces to dominate on the classical designation capability, and a communications medium/light structure force; the second axis manoeuvre battlefield.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Maple Resolve LAV III Reconstitution Program 202 WD's Involvement Moving Towards an Army Equipment Culture Mission C
    Moving towards an Army Equipment Culture Operation Maple Resolve Mission Closure Unit LAV III Reconstitution program 202 WD’s involvement in Afghanistan support our companions EME Journal Regimental Command OST OMBAT ISSION FGHANISTAN 4 Branch Advisor’s Message EME P C M - A The need for an equipment culture and technological Moving towards an Army advice. 6 Equipment Culture Branch Chief Warrant Officer’s Exercise Maple Resolve 5 Message 8 Afghanistan is winding down and our skill-sets have Following years of combat and training specific to a become very specific, Ex Maple Resolve was the theatre of war, the EME Branch must now refocus perfect opportunity to address this issue. itself. 9 Mission Closure Unit 20 Learning and Action The LAV III Reconstitution 12 Operation Nanook 2011 10 program Op Nanook 2011 is one of the three major recurring With the end of the Kandahar mission the LAV III sovereignty Operations conducted annually by the CF LORIT fleet was pulled from theatre and shipped to in the North. London, Ontario for a re-set. 11 202 WD’s involvement What’s up? Trade Section 19 MOBILE trial on Ex Maple Resolve 26 Electronics and Optronics Tech The MOBILE solution permits Materiel Acquisition and 2012 EO Tech Focus Group Support (MA&S) activity in areas where connectivity to the DWAN is not available or is disrupted. 26 Materials Tech 14 Leopard 2A4M Course North American Technology Beyond the modular tent; a look at the trial of the On Oct 1st, 2011, twenty-four Mil and Civ students, 20 Demonstration 1000 Pers RTC Kitchen Project.
    [Show full text]