Extrinsic Factors, Endocrine Mechanisms, and Behavioral Indicators of Migratory Restlessness in Wintering Whooper Swans (Cygnus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Planned Yet Uncontrolled Re-Entries of the Cluster-Ii Spacecraft
PLANNED YET UNCONTROLLED RE-ENTRIES OF THE CLUSTER-II SPACECRAFT Stijn Lemmens(1), Klaus Merz(1), Quirin Funke(1) , Benoit Bonvoisin(2), Stefan Löhle(3), Henrik Simon(1) (1) European Space Agency, Space Debris Office, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email:[email protected] (2) European Space Agency, Materials & Processes Section, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, Netherlands (3) Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, Pfaffenwaldring 29, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany ABSTRACT investigate the physical connection between the Sun and Earth. Flying in a tetrahedral formation, the four After an in-depth mission analysis review the European spacecraft collect detailed data on small-scale changes Space Agency’s (ESA) four Cluster II spacecraft in near-Earth space and the interaction between the performed manoeuvres during 2015 aimed at ensuring a charged particles of the solar wind and Earth's re-entry for all of them between 2024 and 2027. This atmosphere. In order to explore the magnetosphere was done to contain any debris from the re-entry event Cluster II spacecraft occupy HEOs with initial near- to southern latitudes and hence minimise the risk for polar with orbital period of 57 hours at a perigee altitude people on ground, which was enabled by the relative of 19 000 km and apogee altitude of 119 000 km. The stability of the orbit under third body perturbations. four spacecraft have a cylindrical shape completed by Small differences in the highly eccentric orbits of the four long flagpole antennas. The diameter of the four spacecraft will lead to various different spacecraft is 2.9 m with a height of 1.3 m. -
Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 1 January–April 2019 CONTENTS SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 1 Focus .................................................................................................................... 1 Europe ................................................................................................................... 4 11TH European Space Policy Conference ......................................................................... 4 EU programmatic roadmap: towards a comprehensive Regulation of the European Space Programme 4 EDA GOVSATCOM GSC demo project ............................................................................. 5 Programme Advancements: Copernicus, Galileo, ExoMars ................................................... 5 European Space Agency: partnerships continue to flourish................................................... 6 Renewed support for European space SMEs and training ..................................................... 7 UK Space Agency leverages COMPASS project for international cooperation .............................. 7 France multiplies international cooperation .................................................................... 7 Italy’s PRISMA pride ................................................................................................ 8 Establishment of the Portuguese Space Agency: Data is King ................................................ 8 Belgium and Luxembourg -
Strategic Studies Quarterly Spring 2019
Strategic Studies Quarterly Quarterly Strategic Studies SPRING 2019 Volume 13, No. 1 China’s Competitive Strategy: An Interview with Robert O. Work FEATURE ARTICLE Pessimism and Nostalgia in the Second Nuclear Age Christopher J. Fettweis Conventional Arms Transfers and US Spring 2019 Spring Economic Security Eugene Gholz The Changing Dynamics of Twenty-First-Century Space Power James Clay Moltz Horizontal Escalation: An Asymmetric Approach to Russian Aggression? Michael Fitzsimmons Deterring Terrorists Abroad: The Implausibility of Indirect Deterrence Ann Mezzell Strategic Studies Mission Statement Quarterly Strategic Studies Quarterly (SSQ ) is the strategic journal of the United SSQ States Air Force, fostering intellectual enrichment for national and in- ternational security professionals. SSQ provides a forum for critically Chief of Staff, US Air Force examining, informing, and debating national and international security Gen David L. Goldfein, USAF matters. Contributions to SSQ will explore strategic issues of current and Commander, Air Education and Training Command continuing interest to the US Air Force, the larger defense community, Lt Gen Steven L. Kwast, USAF and our international partners. Commander and President, Air University Lt Gen Anthony J. Cotton, USAF Disclaimer Commander, LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education The views and opinions expressed or implied in SSQ are those of the Maj Gen Michael D. Rothstein, USAF authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction Director, Air University Press of the US Air Force, the Department of Defense, Air Education and Lt Col Darin Gregg, USAF Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments Editor of the US government. Col W. Michael Guillot, USAF, Retired Comments and Contact Content Editor Dr. -
Of S.P. Korolev Rocket and Space Public Corporation Energia for 2013
OF S.P. KOROLEV ROCKET AND SPACE PUBLIC CORPORATION ENERGIA FOR 2013 This Annual Report of S.P. Korolev Rocket and Space Public Corporation Energia (also hereinafter called “OAO RSC Energia”, “RSC Energia”, “the Corporation”) by the 2013 performance is drawn up in accordance with the RF Government Decree No 1214 as of December 31, 2010 “On Improvement of the Procedure for Management of Open Joint-Stock Companies Whose Stock is in Federal Ownership and Federal State Unitary Enterprises” with due regard for the requirements set forth in the Order issued by the RF Federal Financial Markets Service No 11-46/pz-n as of October 4, 2011 “On Approval of the Provision on Information Disclosure of Issuers of Registered Securities”. This Annual Report was preliminarily approved by RSC Energia’s Board of Directors on April 29, 2014. Minutes No10 as of May 6, 2014. Accuracy of the data contained in this Annual Report was confirmed by RSC Energia’s Auditing Committee Report as of April 17, 2014. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ........................................................................... 6 ON CORPORATION ACTIVITIES ................................................................................. 8 Corporation background ................................................................................................................................8 Corporation structure (its participation in subsidiary and affiliated companies) ...........................................9 Information about purchase and sale contracts for -
A Call for a New Human Missions Cost Model
A Call For A New Human Missions Cost Model NASA 2019 Cost and Schedule Analysis Symposium NASA Johnson Space Center, August 13-15, 2019 Joseph Hamaker, PhD Christian Smart, PhD Galorath Human Missions Cost Model Advocates Dr. Joseph Hamaker Dr. Christian Smart Director, NASA and DoD Programs Chief Scientist • Former Director for Cost Analytics • Founding Director of the Cost and Parametric Estimating for the Analysis Division at NASA U.S. Missile Defense Agency Headquarters • Oversaw development of the • Originator of NASA’s NAFCOM NASA/Air Force Cost Model cost model, the NASA QuickCost (NAFCOM) Model, the NASA Cost Analysis • Provides subject matter expertise to Data Requirement and the NASA NASA Headquarters, DARPA, and ONCE database Space Development Agency • Recognized expert on parametrics 2 Agenda Historical human space projects Why consider a new Human Missions Cost Model Database for a Human Missions Cost Model • NASA has over 50 years of Human Space Missions experience • NASA’s International Partners have accomplished additional projects . • There are around 70 projects that can provide cost and schedule data • This talk will explore how that data might be assembled to form the basis for a Human Missions Cost Model WHY A NEW HUMAN MISSIONS COST MODEL? NASA’s Artemis Program plans to Artemis needs cost and schedule land humans on the moon by 2024 estimates Lots of projects: Lunar Gateway, Existing tools have some Orion, landers, SLS, commercially applicability but it seems obvious provided elements (which we may (to us) that a dedicated HMCM is want to independently estimate) needed Some of these elements have And this can be done—all we ongoing cost trajectories (e.g. -
Cape Canaveral Launch Schedule
Cape Canaveral Launch Schedule Propitious or unsterile, Lawrence never froths any histogenesis! Nigel recolonise poetically while theomorphiclengthways Raynor Geoffrey retake priests impalpably that tot. or tubulate irregularly. Mickie still partook friskingly while Daily admission and cape canaveral and best seen from the three tesla roadster into orbit from any time Flight software is scheduled to? The vostochny cosmodrome in greater detail than two payload for? End of space center in and from the nasa astronauts mike hopkins walk on saturday but could one see at the app ever before! Where possible that product may change, and local news from users are designed to cruise shutdown have the collected data. Facebook oversight board of future human missions, cape canaveral launch schedule or in every morning, who is raising in kazakhstan, but we had to? Flute for lazy loading only known as conditions continued on politics and schedule or gssap, where and previous missions, astronauts to the scarlet knights photos. Kistner iii has to take in place to plan your journey for an orbital configuration variables: this and cape canaveral, opinion and the moon will include admission and make our. Have further study the cape canaveral launch views at cape canaveral launch schedule of florida to get new way to share posts by work. Eastern test flight ended early january, cape canaveral launch schedule. It somehow kept to space exploration, cape canaveral launch schedule or your bucket list of the scarlet knights photos, with members evaluate which is great. The far side of global exploration during the first time, pyotr dubrov and thousands of the space? Martian orbiter and reviews and inspire the oversight board of life wants to protect your pay for certain launches as our services library download apps on technologies to? Turkish ground teams have no launch schedule is to it civil and cape canaveral launch services. -
A Strategic Pathway to the Artificial Gravity Testbed Element in Low Earth Orbit
50th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2021-318 12-15 July 2021 A Strategic Pathway to the Artificial Gravity Testbed Element in Low Earth Orbit Albert Rajkumar1 and Kriss J. Kennedy2 University of Houston, Houston, TX. This paper is a continuation of previous investigations of a testbed for an artificial gravity (AG) platform in low Earth orbit. The goal of the initial design proposal is to address a knowledge gap in our understanding of the long-term effects of partial gravity on physiological and psychological human capabilities. Therefore, the objective is to create a capability to undertake research to address this knowledge gap. Because human centrifuges on Earth cannot recreate effects of partial gravity on human physiology and parabolic flights fail to provide long enough exposures to generate reliable data, novel research platforms to investigate partial gravity effects on humans and systems are needed. The proposed artificial gravity 3-body testbed (AG Testbed Element) will comprise two customized crewed-Dragons docked to a Central Hub, which in turn will dock to the Zvezda module of the International Space Station intermittently. The goals & objectives of the AG Testbed have been divided into two categories: technical and physiological. The testbed's first phase will develop the technical systems to ensure the spinning testbed is human rated. The second phase will be dedicated to physiological research test objectives. First, this paper explores the AG Testbed Element Design, Development, Test & Evaluation (DDT&E) plan and risk mitigation strategies. Secondly, this effort explores an evolutionary roadmap towards a larger, more robust platform which will address the knowledge gap mentioned later. -
Sources of Extraterrestrial Rare Earth Elements: to the Moon and Beyond
resources Article Sources of Extraterrestrial Rare Earth Elements: To the Moon and Beyond Claire L. McLeod 1,* and Mark. P. S. Krekeler 2 1 Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences, 203 Shideler Hall, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA 2 Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Miami University-Hamilton, Hamilton, OH 45011, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 513-529-9662; Fax: 513-529-1542 Received: 10 June 2017; Accepted: 18 August 2017; Published: 23 August 2017 Abstract: The resource budget of Earth is limited. Rare-earth elements (REEs) are used across the world by society on a daily basis yet several of these elements have <2500 years of reserves left, based on current demand, mining operations, and technologies. With an increasing population, exploration of potential extraterrestrial REE resources is inevitable, with the Earth’s Moon being a logical first target. Following lunar differentiation at ~4.50–4.45 Ga, a late-stage (after ~99% solidification) residual liquid enriched in Potassium (K), Rare-earth elements (REE), and Phosphorus (P), (or “KREEP”) formed. Today, the KREEP-rich region underlies the Oceanus Procellarum and Imbrium Basin region on the lunar near-side (the Procellarum KREEP Terrain, PKT) and has been tentatively estimated at preserving 2.2 × 108 km3 of KREEP-rich lithologies. The majority of lunar samples (Apollo, Luna, or meteoritic samples) contain REE-bearing minerals as trace phases, e.g., apatite and/or merrillite, with merrillite potentially contributing up to 3% of the PKT. Other lunar REE-bearing lunar phases include monazite, yittrobetafite (up to 94,500 ppm yttrium), and tranquillityite (up to 4.6 wt % yttrium, up to 0.25 wt % neodymium), however, lunar sample REE abundances are low compared to terrestrial ores. -
Contributions of the International Space Station Towards Future Exploration Missions
Acta Astronautica 104 (2014) 552–557 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Contributions of the International Space Station towards future exploration missions Johannes Weppler German Aerospace Center (DLR), Königswinterer Str. 522-524, 53227 Bonn, Germany article info abstract Article history: When the idea of a large space station in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) was conceived in the Received 24 January 2014 1980s, it was primarily planned as an orbiting laboratory for microgravity research. Some Received in revised form even thought of it as an industrial plant in space. Whereas the latter did not materialize 4 June 2014 because of various reasons, the former is absolutely true when you talk about the Accepted 13 June 2014 International Space Station (ISS). Since the transition to a six astronaut crew in 2009 and Available online 21 June 2014 the completion of its assembly in 2011, it has been intensively used as laboratory in a wide Keywords: field of scientific topics. Experiments conducted on ISS have yielded first class results in ISS biology, physiology, material science, basic physics, and many more. While its role as a Exploration laboratory in space is widely recognized, the awareness for its potential for preparing MPCV future exploration missions beyond LEO is just increasing. This paper provides informa- ESM Technology tion on how the ISS programme contributes to future exploration efforts, both manned and unmanned. It highlights the work that has been done or is currently underway in the fields of technology, operations, and science. Further potentials and future projects for exploration preparation are also shown. -
Icons on the International Space Station
religions Article Eternity in Low Earth Orbit: Icons on the International Space Station Wendy Salmond 1, Justin Walsh 1 and Alice Gorman 2,* 1 Department of Art, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA; [email protected] (W.S.); [email protected] (J.W.) 2 Department of Archaeology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia * Correspondence: alice.gorman@flinders.edu.au Received: 15 October 2020; Accepted: 10 November 2020; Published: 17 November 2020 Abstract: This paper investigates the material culture of icons on the International Space Station as part of a complex web of interactions between cosmonauts and the Russian Orthodox Church, reflecting contemporary terrestrial political and social affairs. An analysis of photographs from the International Space Station (ISS) demonstrated that a particular area of the Zvezda module is used for the display of icons, both Orthodox and secular, including the Mother of God of Kazan and Yuri Gagarin. The Orthodox icons are frequently sent to space and returned to Earth at the request of church clerics. In this process, the icons become part of an economy of belief that spans Earth and space. This practice stands in contrast to the prohibition against displaying political/religious imagery in the U.S.-controlled modules of ISS. The icons mark certain areas of ISS as bounded sacred spaces or hierotopies, separated from the limitless outer space beyond the space station walls. Keywords: International Space Station; iconography; hierotopy; material culture; sacred space; cosmonaut 1. Introduction How the perspective of being outside the world—that is, in space—changes personal approaches to spirituality among space travelers has been the subject of numerous studies (e.g., Suedfeld 2006; Weibel 2016, 2020; Weibel and Swanson 2006). -
YENİ UZAY ÇAĞI: 21’İNCİ YÜZYILDA KOZMİK REKABET IV Uluslararası Uzay İstasyonu Ve Uzay İstasyonlarının Geleceği
YENİ UZAY ÇAĞI: 21’İNCİ YÜZYILDA KOZMİK REKABET IV Uluslararası Uzay İstasyonu ve Uzay İstasyonlarının Geleceği ARAŞTIRMA RAPORU ARALIK 2020 ARAŞTIRMA RAPORU ARALIK 2020 İşbu eserde yer alan veriler/bilgiler, yalnızca bilgi amaçlı olup, bu eserde bulunan veriler/bilgiler tavsiye, reklam ya da iş geliştirme amacına yönelik değildir. STM Savunma Teknolojileri Mühendislik ve Ticaret A.Ş. işbu eserde sunulan verilerin/ bilgilerin içeriği, güncelliği ya da doğruluğu konusunda herhangi bir taahhüde girmemekte, kullanıcı veya üçüncü kişilerin bu eserde yer alan verilere/bilgilere dayanarak gerçekleştirecekleri eylemlerden ötürü sorumluluk kabul etmemektedir. Bu eserde yer alan bilgilerin her türlü hakkı STM Savunma Teknolojileri Mühendislik ve Ticaret A.Ş’ye aittir. Yazılı izin olmaksızın işbu eserde yer alan bilgi, yazı, ifadenin bir kısmı veya tamamı, herhangi bir ortamda hiçbir şekilde yayımlanamaz, çoğaltılamaz, işlenemez. 2 YENİ UZAY ÇAĞI: 21’İNCİ YÜZYILDA KOZMİK REKABET IV - ULUSLARARASI UZAY İSTASYONU VE UZAY İSTASYONLARININ GELECEĞİ ARAŞTIRMA RAPORU ARALIK 2020 STM ThinkTech 1. GİRİŞ “Yeni Uzay Çağı: 21’inci Yüzyılda Kozmik Rekabet” ko- işlevleri, verimli olup olmadıkları, yeni istasyon projeleri nulu araştırma raporumuzun önceki bölümlerinde[1], [2], [3] ve bu tür uzay yapılarının gelecekteki evrimine ilişkin ko- belirttiğimiz üzere, uzay yeteneklerini geliştirmenin çok nular ele alınacaktır. sayıda avantajı bulunmaktadır. Uydular askeri ve sivil ile- tişimi kolaylaştırmaktadır. İnsanlı uzay seyahatleri ulusla- rarası prestij sağlarken, aynı zamanda bilim ve teknoloji 2. UZAY İSTASYONLARI VE için fırsatlar da sağlamaktadır. Uzayda yapılan deneyler İŞLEVLERİ Dünya’daki tıbbi, çevresel ve teknolojik zorlukları ele al- mak için kullanılan çok sayıda atılımla sonuçlanmaktadır. Uzay istasyonları, insanların içinde yaşayıp bilimsel, as- Ayrıca yeni yeni gelişen özel sektör katılımlı uzay ekono- keri ve ticari deneyler yapabileceği kalıcı uydulardır. -
SD2905 Human Spaceflight Lecture 8, 14-2-2014 the International Space Station Part 2 - Operation TODAY: Learn and Understand How a Space Station (ISS) Is Operated
SD2905 Human Spaceflight Lecture 8, 14-2-2014 The International Space Station Part 2 - Operation TODAY: Learn and understand how a space station (ISS) is operated Discussion: How do you think one operates a space station? • From ground: Each ISS partner its own CC. (Pros and cons) • Logistics – sending stuff there; taking care of it on the station. Spare parts on-board when things break, contingency food/water/O2,... in case a delivery fails • Planning! Planning! Planning! Longterm, shortterm, daily work schedules – not only for crew: attitude, communication, thermal, experiments, PR,... • Crew itself: checklists – now electronically. Crew notes. Time to prepare daily work. You do something you trained for many months, perhaps a year, ago! • Utilization limitations: – Biggest bottleneck: Crew time! Aiming to get about 40 h / week ”utilization” from the three USOS crew members. (Note: Robotics – can be done from ground!) – Upmass & downmass also major bottlenecks – Power, data links • Control centres and grounnd ops • Planning • Cargo vehicles • Docking systems • Robotic arms • Crew work • Utilization limitations. SD2905 HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT COURSE 2014 LECTURE 8 2 Many control centers involved with ISS Main centers: Houston (MCC-H) and Moscow (MCC-M), Oberpfaffenhofen in Germany for ESA (COL-CC) and Tsukuba in Japan Others are more for specific events, like for ATV in Toulouse, France. SD2905 HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT COURSE 2014 LECTURE 8 3 The Flight Director is boss for all activities Capcom only person who talks with the crew (normally) Houston