DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group, P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group, P Program and Abstract Volume LPI Contribution No. 1685 Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group October 22–24, 2012 • Greenbelt, Maryland Sponsor National Aeronautics and Space Administration Conveners Charles Shearer University of New Mexico Jeffrey Plescia The John Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory Clive Neal University of Notre Dame Stephen Mackwell Lunar and Planetary Institute Scientific Organizing Committee Charles Shearer, University of New Mexico Jeffrey Plescia, John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Michael Wargo, NASA Headquarters Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Dallas Bienhoff, The Boeing Corporation Noah Petro, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Kurt Sacksteder, NASA Glenn Research Center Greg Schmidt, NASA Lunar Science Institute/NASA Ames Research Center George Tahu, NASA Headquarters Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 1685 Compiled in 2012 by Meeting and Publication Services Lunar and Planetary Institute USRA Houston 3600 Bay Area Boulevard, Houston TX 77058-1113 This material is based upon work supported by NASA under Award No. NNX08AC28A. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Lunar and Planetary Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under a cooperative agreement with the Science Mission Directorate of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. Abstracts in this volume may be cited as Author A. B. (2012) Title of abstract. In Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group, p. XX. LPI Contribution No. 1685, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. ISSN No. 0161-5297 Preface This volume contains abstracts that have been accepted for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group, October 22–24, 2012, Greenbelt, Maryland. Administration and publications support for this meeting were provided by the staff of the Meeting and Publication Services Department at the Lunar and Planetary Institute. Technical Guide to Sessions Monday, October 22, 2012 8:30 a.m. Conference Room W150 Lunar Missions from the Apollo Program to Artemis and Beyond 1:30 p.m. Conference Room W150 Exploring the Solar System: Updates from NASA 5:30 p.m. Conference Room W120 Poster Session: Exploration of the Moon 6:45 p.m. Visitor’s Center NASA Goddard’s Visitors Center Open House for LEAG Attendees Featuring a Brand-New Exhibit on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Tuesday, October 23, 2012 8:30 a.m. Conference Room W150 Lunar Missions: The Next Generation 1:45 p.m. Conference Room W150 The Cold-Hearted Orb that Rules the Night Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:30 a.m. Conference Room W150 Human Exploration of the Moon and Gaps in our Strategic Knowledge Contents Program ........................................................................................................................................................................ xi ORION/MoonRise: A Human and Robotic Sample Return Mission Concept from the South Pole-Aitken Basin L. Alkalai, B. Solish, J. O. Wlliott, J. Mueller, T. McElrath, and J. Parker .................................................... 1 Latitudinal Enrichment of Hydrogen in the Lunar Polar Regions: Constraints on Hydrogen Mobility W. V. Boynton, G. F. Droege, K. Harshman, M. A. Schaffner, I. G. Mitrofanov, T. P. McClanahan, and the LEND Team ......................................................................................................... 2 Bistatic Radar Observations of the Moon Using the Arecibo Observatory and Mini-RF on LRO D. B. J. Bussey, R. Schulze, D. E. Wahl, G. W. Patterson, M. Nolan, J. R. Jensen, F. S. Turner, D. A. Yocky, J. T. S. Cahill, C. V. Jakowatz, R. K. Raney, and the Mini-RF Team ............................................................................................................... 3 Volatile Extraction and In Situ Resource Utilization for the Moon Applied to Near Earth Objects E. H. Cardiff .................................................................................................................................................... 4 A Revisit to Apollo Magnetic Field Records for Sounding of the Lunar Interior P. J. Chi ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 LunarCube: Payload Development for Enhanced Yet Low Cost Lunar Exploration P. E. Clark, R. MacDowall, R. Cox, A. Vasant, S. Schaire, and B. Malphrus ................................................. 6 Frontier: Towards Onboard Intelligence for More Capable Next Generation Space Assets P. E. Clark, M. L. Rilee, and S. A. Curtis ........................................................................................................ 7 Near Real-Time Prospecting for Lunar Volatiles: Demonstrating RESOLVE Science in the Field A. Colaprete, R. Elphic, J. Heldmann, K. Ennico, G. Mattes, and J. Sanders ................................................ 8 Gateways to the Solar System: Innovative Advanced Magnet Lab Mass Driver Launch Platforms at L1 and L2 R. Cox, P. Clark, A. Vasant, and R. Meinke .................................................................................................... 9 Modal Evaluation of Fluid Volume in Spacecraft Propellant Tanks K. M. Crosby, R. Werlink, S. Mathe, and K. Lubick ...................................................................................... 10 Ground Data Systems for Real Time Lunar Science M. C. Deans, T. Smith, D. S. Lees, E. B. Scharff, T. E. Cohen, and D. S. S. Lim .......................................... 11 The Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE): T-Minus One Year and Counting R. C. Elphic, G. T. Delory, E. J. Grayzeck, A. Colaprete, M. Horanyi, P. Mahaffy, B. Hine, J. Salute, and D. Boroson ................................................................................................................ 12 DREAM Center for Lunar Science: A Three Year Summary Report W. M. Farrell, R. M. Killen, and G. T. Delory .............................................................................................. 13 The Search for a High Altitude Dust Exosphere: Observational Status and Dust Upper Limits D. A. Glenar, T. J. Stubbs, W. M. Farrell, J. W. Keller, and R. R. Vondrak ................................................. 14 From CMEs to Earth/Lunar Radiation Dosages: A First in Heliospheric End-to-End Coupling M. J. Gorby, N. A. Schwadron, J. A. Linker, H. E. Spence, L. W. Townsend, F. A. Cucinotta, and J. K. Wilson .................................................................................................................. 15 Thermal, Thermophysical, and Compositional Properties of the Moon Revealed by the Diviner Lunar Radiometer B. T. Greenhagen, D. A. Paige, and Diviner Science Team .......................................................................... 16 RESOLVE: Real-Time Science Operations to Support a Lunar Polar Volatiles Rover Mission J. L. Heldmann, A. Colaprete, R. Elphic, G. Mattes, K. Ennico, E. Fritzler, M. Marinova, R. McMurray, S. Morse, T. Roush, and C. Stoker .................................................................. 17 Simulation of Radar Sounder Echoes and Inversion of Lunar Subsurface Y.-Q. Jin ........................................................................................................................................................ 18 LROC Observations in the LRO Extended Mission B. L. Jolliff, M. S. Robinson, and T. R. Watters ............................................................................................. 19 Sampling South Pole-Aitken Basin: The Moonrise Approach B. L. Jolliff, C. K. Shearer, and B. A. Cohen ................................................................................................. 20 Mapping of Luna-17 Landing Site and Reconstruction of Lunokhod-1 Stereo Panoramas I. Karachevtseva, A. Zubarev, I. Nadezhdina, N. Kozlova, and E. Gusakova ............................................... 21 Lunar Concrete — Using Analogue Test Sites on the Big Island of Hawai‛i for “Dust-to-Bricks”: Demonstration of Technologies Associated with Basalt/Regolith Material Processing/Fabrication/Construction R. M. Kelso, J. C. Hamilton, and C. Andersen .............................................................................................. 22 A Sustainable Architecture for Lunar Resource Prospecting from an EML-Based Exploration Platform K. Klaus, K. Post, and S. J. Lawrence ........................................................................................................... 23 Bullialdus Crater: A Rare Window into Lunar Plutonism and Late-Stage Magma Ocean Fluids R. L. Klima, J. T. S. Cahill, J. Hagerty, and D. Lawrence ............................................................................ 24 The First Exploration Telerobotics Symposium — Telepresence: A New Paradigm for Human- Robotic Cooperation D. F. Lester, A. Valinia, H. Thronson, and G. Schmidt ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Study on Professional Athlete Career Transition: an Overview of the Literature Keiko Jodai* and Haruo Nogawa*
    Career transitions of professional athletes Review : Sociology and Philosophy A study on professional athlete career transition: an overview of the literature Keiko Jodai* and Haruo Nogawa* *Graduate School,School of Sport and Health Science, Juntendo University 1-1, Hiragagakuendai, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1695 Japan [email protected] [Received February 25, 2011 ; Accepted August 22, 2011] Since the 1990’s, there have been many research studies that focus on career transitions for professional athletes in Japan. The main reason for this is that during that period, amateur sports teams, such as soccer and basketball, were spun off from divisions of companies to become separate professional teams. Consequently, this changed forced how athletes view the transition to a second career because they can no longer count on being employed by the companies that had previously run teams as part of their corporate operations. Research studies primarily covered top athletes but did not distinguish between the amateur and professional athletes. In reviewing the assumptions and results of such previous research with respect to professional status, this study will present the basic themes of such research. For example, early research investigated the actual reasons why and how athletes decide to change career; whereas later research seek to study how athletes specifi cally deal with career changes. Finally, in order to determine the effectiveness of actual support programs, the authors of this study proposes that more thorough investigation is needed to scrutinize how the career transitions of ex-professional football players have changed over time by using a “longitudinal” analysis. Keywords: career transitions, professional athletes [Football Science Vol.9, 50-61, 2012] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject
    Kaluza-Klein Gravity J. M. Overduin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 and P. S. Wesson Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Gravity Probe-B, Hansen Physics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A. 94305 Abstract We review higher-dimensional unified theories from the general relativity, rather than the particle physics side. Three distinct approaches to the subject are identi- fied and contrasted: compactified, projective and noncompactified. We discuss the cosmological and astrophysical implications of extra dimensions, and conclude that none of the three approaches can be ruled out on observational grounds at the present time. arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 7 May 1998 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 3 February 2008 1 Introduction Kaluza’s [1] achievement was to show that five-dimensional general relativity contains both Einstein’s four-dimensional theory of gravity and Maxwell’s the- ory of electromagnetism. He however imposed a somewhat artificial restriction (the cylinder condition) on the coordinates, essentially barring the fifth one a priori from making a direct appearance in the laws of physics. Klein’s [2] con- tribution was to make this restriction less artificial by suggesting a plausible physical basis for it in compactification of the fifth dimension. This idea was enthusiastically received by unified-field theorists, and when the time came to include the strong and weak forces by extending Kaluza’s mechanism to higher dimensions, it was assumed that these too would be compact. This line of thinking has led through eleven-dimensional supergravity theories in the 1980s to the current favorite contenders for a possible “theory of everything,” ten-dimensional superstrings.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Charter
    OLYMPIC CHARTER IN FORCE AS FROM 17 JULY 2020 OLYMPIC CHARTER IN FORCE AS FROM 17 JULY 2020 © International Olympic Committee Château de Vidy – C.P. 356 – CH-1007 Lausanne/Switzerland Tel. + 41 21 621 61 11 – Fax + 41 21 621 62 16 www.olympic.org Published by the International Olympic Committee – July 2020 All rights reserved. Printing by DidWeDo S.à.r.l., Lausanne, Switzerland Printed in Switzerland Table of Contents Abbreviations used within the Olympic Movement ...................................................................8 Introduction to the Olympic Charter............................................................................................9 Preamble ......................................................................................................................................10 Fundamental Principles of Olympism .......................................................................................11 Chapter 1 The Olympic Movement ............................................................................................. 15 1 Composition and general organisation of the Olympic Movement . 15 2 Mission and role of the IOC* ............................................................................................ 16 Bye-law to Rule 2 . 18 3 Recognition by the IOC .................................................................................................... 18 4 Olympic Congress* ........................................................................................................... 19 Bye-law to Rule 4
    [Show full text]
  • Our Goal at Olympia Gymnastics Academy, Inc
    Part One: Introduction to Olympia Gymnastics Academy Welcome to the Olympia Gymnastics Academy Team Program Thank you for your interest in Olympia Gymnastics. The adventure you and your child are about to embark on will be a very special one. (Yes, it will be your adventure too!) Over the years, we have had the pleasure of watching many children learn, grow, develop, and mature into confident young adults who are ready to face the world. We look forward to the unique opportunities which working with your child will present. This undertaking will give your child a stage on which to develop his confidence, poise, individuality, mental and physical discipline, determination, appreciation for dedicated effort, and self-respect. Your child will mature among individuals and circumstances that will demand his finest efforts and judgments. He will develop close relationships with other young athletes who demand the best of themselves and expect the best in others. Educational opportunities will be made available which will compliment and enhance the experiences he will have in the gym. Above all, he will have tons of fun! We would like to personally congratulate each and every one of you for choosing gymnastics for your child. Gymnastics is the greatest overall body conditioning activity that you can have your child involved in. A study was done testing the components of physical fitness (strength, flexibility, coordination, etc.) of a number of college athletes involved in various sports. When the totals were added up, gymnasts proved to be the most physically fit. Some of the physical attributes that you will find developing in your young gymnast will be: strength, flexibility, kinesthetic awareness, muscular control, muscular endurance, coordination, timing, explosive power, agility, running speed, balance, and grace.
    [Show full text]
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Gravity Probe B? a Quest for Experimental Truth the GP-B Flight
    What is Gravity Probe B? than Gravity Probe B. It’s just a star, a telescope, and a spinning sphere.” However, it took the exceptional collaboration of Stanford, Gravity Probe B (GP-B) is a NASA physics mission to experimentally MSFC, Lockheed Martin and a host of others more than four decades investigate Einstein’s 1916 general theory of relativity—his theory of gravity. to develop the ultra-precise gyroscopes and the other cutting- GP-B uses four spherical gyroscopes and a telescope, housed in a satellite edge technologies necessary to carry out this “simple” experiment. orbiting 642 km (400 mi) above the Earth, to measure, with unprecedented accuracy, two extraordinary effects predicted by the general theory of rela- The GP-B Flight Mission & Data Analysis tivity: 1) the geodetic effect—the amount by which the Earth warps the local spacetime in which it resides; and 2) the frame-dragging effect—the amount On April 20, 2004 at 9:57:24 AM PDT, a crowd of over 2,000 current and by which the rotating Earth drags its local spacetime around with it. GP-B former GP-B team members and supporters watched and cheered as the tests these two effects by precisely measuring the precession (displacement) GP-B spacecraft lifted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base. That emotionally angles of the spin axes of the four gyros over the course of a year and com- overwhelming day, culminating with the extraordinary live video of paring these experimental results with predictions from Einstein’s theory. the spacecraft separating from the second stage booster meant, as GP-B Program Manager Gaylord Green put it, “that 10,000 things went right.” A Quest for Experimental Truth Once in orbit, the spacecraft first underwent a four-month Initialization The idea of testing general relativity with orbiting gyroscopes was sug- and Orbit Checkout (IOC), in which all systems and instruments were gested independently by two physicists, George Pugh and Leonard Schiff, initialized, tested, and optimized for the data collection to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • SEER for Hardware's Cost Model for Future Orbital Concepts (“FAR OUT”)
    Presented at the 2008 SCEA-ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com SEER for Hardware’s Cost Model for Future Orbital Concepts (“FAR OUT”) Lee Fischman ISPA/SCEA Industry Hills 2008 Presented at the 2008 SCEA-ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com Introduction A model for predicting the cost of long term unmanned orbital spacecraft (Far Out) has been developed at the request of AFRL. Far Out has been integrated into SEER for Hardware. This presentation discusses the Far Out project and resulting model. © 2008 Galorath Incorporated Presented at the 2008 SCEA-ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com Goals • Estimate space satellites in any earth orbit. Deep space exploration missions may be considered as data is available, or may be an area for further research in Phase 3. • Estimate concepts to be launched 10-20 years into the future. • Cost missions ranging from exploratory to strategic, with a specific range decided based on estimating reliability. The most reliable estimates are likely to be in the middle of this range. • Estimates will include hardware, software, systems engineering, and production. • Handle either government or commercial missions, either “one-of-a-kind” or constellations. • Be used in a “top-down” manner using relatively less specific mission resumes, similar to those available from sources such as the Earth Observation Portal or Janes Space Directory. © 2008 Galorath Incorporated Presented at the 2008 SCEA-ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com Challenge: Technology Change Over Time Evolution in bus technologies Evolution in payload technologies and performance 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 50. Obletnica Pristanka Na Luni in Pomen Osvajanja Vesolja Za Geodezijo 50Th Anniversary of the Moon Landing and the Importance
    GEODETSKI VESTNIK | 63/4 | 50. OBLETNICA PRISTANKA 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF NA LUNI IN POMEN THE MOON LANDING AND OSVAJANJA VESOLJA ZA THE IMPORTANCE OF GEODEZIJO CONQUERING SPACE FOR GEODESY Sandi Berk STROKOVNE RAZPRAVE | PROFESSIONAL DISCUSSIONS RAZPRAVE STROKOVNE 1 UVOD Letos mineva petdeset let od prvega obiska človeka na edini Zemljini luni – Mesecu (v nadaljevanju kar: Luna). Ta »majhen korak za človeka, a velikanski skok za človeštvo« je bil storjen 20. julija 1969, ko sta Neil Armstrong in Edwin Aldrin v lunarnem modulu Eagle (tj. Orel) pristala poleg Malega zahodnega kraterja v Morju tišine (slika 1). Okrogla obletnica je priložnost, da se ozremo nazaj in osvežimo dogod- ke iz pionirskih časov osvajanja vesolja. Hkrati lahko osvetlimo pomen takratnih podvigov ter njihove učinke na tehnološki razvoj in tudi napredek geodezije. Slika 1: Armstrongova fotografija Aldrina ob nameščenem seizmografu; nad njim je reflektor za lasersko merjenje oddaljenosti od Zemlje, desno zgoraj pa je lunarni modul Eagle (vir: NASA, 2019). | 589 | | 63/4 | GEODETSKI VESTNIK Kje se sploh prične vesolje – kako visoko je treba poleteti? Mejo med Zemljino atmosfero in vesoljskim prostorom (angl. outer space) imenujemo Kármánova ločnica in je približno sto kilometrov nad površjem Zemlje. Nad to višino za letenje ne veljajo več zakoni aerodinamike, ampak je mogoče zgolj še letenje po zakonih balistike, torej na raketni pogon. Pomembna je tudi v pravnem smislu, saj se tu konča zračni prostor držav in začne veljati mednarodno vesoljsko pravo. Kot vemo, letijo potniška letala na višini približno deset kilometrov. Nedavni rekordni polet z jadralnim letalom je dosegel višino 23 kilometrov nad morjem, vendar s pomočjo stratosferskih zavetrnih valov, ki nastajajo zaradi izredno močnih zračnih tokov med visokimi gorskimi vrhovi Andov (Ebbesen Jensen, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Yet Uncontrolled Re-Entries of the Cluster-Ii Spacecraft
    PLANNED YET UNCONTROLLED RE-ENTRIES OF THE CLUSTER-II SPACECRAFT Stijn Lemmens(1), Klaus Merz(1), Quirin Funke(1) , Benoit Bonvoisin(2), Stefan Löhle(3), Henrik Simon(1) (1) European Space Agency, Space Debris Office, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email:[email protected] (2) European Space Agency, Materials & Processes Section, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, Netherlands (3) Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, Pfaffenwaldring 29, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany ABSTRACT investigate the physical connection between the Sun and Earth. Flying in a tetrahedral formation, the four After an in-depth mission analysis review the European spacecraft collect detailed data on small-scale changes Space Agency’s (ESA) four Cluster II spacecraft in near-Earth space and the interaction between the performed manoeuvres during 2015 aimed at ensuring a charged particles of the solar wind and Earth's re-entry for all of them between 2024 and 2027. This atmosphere. In order to explore the magnetosphere was done to contain any debris from the re-entry event Cluster II spacecraft occupy HEOs with initial near- to southern latitudes and hence minimise the risk for polar with orbital period of 57 hours at a perigee altitude people on ground, which was enabled by the relative of 19 000 km and apogee altitude of 119 000 km. The stability of the orbit under third body perturbations. four spacecraft have a cylindrical shape completed by Small differences in the highly eccentric orbits of the four long flagpole antennas. The diameter of the four spacecraft will lead to various different spacecraft is 2.9 m with a height of 1.3 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Trajectories
    Transportation for Exploration: New Thoughts About Orbital Dynamics Ed Belbruno Innovative Orbital Design, Inc & Courant Insitiute(NYU) January 4, 2012 NASA FISO 1 Evolution of Astrodynamics Conic; Stable (Hohmann, 20s) (Hohmann transfers, Gravity assist(Voyager, Galileo)) Nonlinear; Stable (Apollo, 60s) Nonlinear; Unstable (ISEE-3, 70s) (Transfer to and from halo orbits, no utilization of fuel savings via dynamics – Farquhar …) Nonlinear; Unstable; Low Energy/Fuel (Hiten, 91) (First use of utilization of chaotic dynamics/manifolds to achieve new approach to space travel for ballistic capture(EB, 86, 91) and for the study of halo orbit dynamics (Llibre-Simo, 85 – Genesis, 2001) Weak Stability Boundary Theory (EB 86) 2 Hohmann Transfer Conic, Stable – 2-body 3 Figure Eight(Apollo) Nonlinear, Stable – 3-body 4 ISEEC-3 Nonlinear-Unstable – 4 body 5 Ballistic Capture Transfers Weak Stability Boundary Theory(EB 86) • Way to transfer to the Moon, and other bodies, where no DeltaV is needed for capture • New methodology to trajectory design • Thought in 1985 to be impossible 6 Background • Capture Problem Earth -> Moon (LEO -> LLO) • Hohmann Transfer: Fast (3days), Fuel Hog (Need to slow down! 1 km/s to be captured – large maneuver ) Risky Used in Apollo 7 Idea of Achieving Ballistic Capture • Sneak up on Moon - very carefully (next figure A-B-C-D) • Like a surfer catching a wave • Want to ride the „gravity transition(weak stability) boundary‟ between the Earth-Moon-Sun 8 Top – Lagrange points Bottom – Sneaking up on Moon 9 Ballistic capture is chaotic (chaos – leaf blowing in wind) 10 • WSB – generalization of Lagrange points • Forces(GM, GE, CF) balance while spacecraft moving wrt Earth-Moon (L-points – forces balance for spacecraft fixed wrt Earth-Moon) • Get a multi-dimensional region about Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Act Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Moon Express Inc. for Lunar Catalyst Article 1
    SPACE ACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AND MOON EXPRESS INC. FOR LUNAR CATALYST ARTICLE 1. AUTHORITY AND PARTIES In accordance with the National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113), this Agreement is entered into by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, located at 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546 (hereinafter referred to as "NASA") and Moon Express, Inc. located at 100 Space Port Way, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 (hereinafter referred to as "Partner" or "Moon Express"). NASA and Partner may be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties." ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE This agreement is an amended version of Space Act Agreement #18251, which went into effect on September 30, 2014. NASA recognizes that private-sector investment in technologies intended to enable commercial lunar activities has been increasing. In addition to recognizing these activities NASA wants to encourage and enable commercial successes to cultivate the increased innovation and entrepreneurship in the commercial space transportation sector. The “Lunar Cargo Transportation and Landing by Soft Touchdown” (Lunar CATALYST) initiative, is consistent with the National Space Transportation Policy. Per this policy, NASA is “committed to encouraging and facilitating a viable, healthy, and competitive U.S. Commercial space transportation industry”. This initiative also supports the internationally shared space exploration goals of the Global Exploration Roadmap (GER) that NASA and 11 other space agencies around the world released in August 2013. The GER acknowledges the value of public-private partnerships and commercial services to enable sustainable exploration of asteroids, the Moon and Mars.
    [Show full text]