In the Fiction of Georges Perec
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Designing Theory: Social Space(s) in the Fiction of Georges Perec Christopher Campbell, 18 July 2013 B.A. English Literature (Earned) M.S. Architecture (Conferred) School of Architecture & Interior Design College of Design, Architecture, Art, & Planning A thesis submitted to the Graduate School at the University of Cincinnati Committee Chair: John Hancock The presence of spatial theory in the domain of academic disciplines can be easily overlooked, perhaps discrediting the relevance of interdisciplinary studies. A case in point can be made about fiction writing, an art form which clearly demonstrates the process of generating imaginative spaces and buildings in order to evoke the social conditions experienced by human beings. This thesis looks at writer Georges Perec and theorist Henri Lefebvre, and highlights an obvious similarity in their ideas of space, albeit one in theoretical writing and the other fictional. A cross-interpretation of Perec’s fiction with reference to Lefebvre’s theory can help us identify how social spaces in fiction, specifically, are created as a story is written. This can be demonstrated by juxtaposing the settings, characterizations, and narrative voices of Perec’s novels Things: A Story of the Sixties and Life A User’s Manual. If this link between the theory of social space and the craft of fiction can be exemplified, the potential for using fiction as a means to critique humans in their built environment may become more effective. Theoretical underpinnings, by example of this study, can be creatively rendered. More generally, this project intends to demonstrate that spatial theory can and does appear across disciplinary boundaries. i ii For my dad iii Table of Contents Preface 1 The Ouvroir de Litterature Potentielle (OuLiPo) & Georges Perec 4 Henri Lefebvre & Social Space(s) 13 Methodology 20 Setting 27 Characterization 35 Narrative Voice 40 Concluding Remarks 46 iv Preface “Yes, it could begin like this.” - from Life A User’s Manual, Georges Perec A high school math instructor first convinced me that space and literature are not mutually exclusive. He demonstrated this by having me read Flatland (1884), a fictional novella by Edwin A. Abbott, featuring the narrator and protagonist A Square. Along with his wife and children, A Square lives in the Two Dimensional world of the same name as the book’s title. Upon a chance encounter with a ‘Stranger from Spaceland,’ he comes to see that there exists a Three Dimensional world. Following this discovery, A Square sets out to document his findings in an effort to reveal to his fellow Flatlanders the extent to which reality can take form. He writes: With the view of evading the Law, if possible, I spoke not of a physical Dimension, but of a Thoughtland whence, in theory, a Figure could look down upon Flatland and see simultaneously the insides of all things, and where it was possible that there might be supposed to exist a Figure environed, as it were, with six Squares, and containing eight terminal Points. But in writing this book I found myself sadly hampered by the impossibility of drawing such diagrams as were necessary for my purpose; for of course, in our country of Flatland, there are no tablets but Lines, and no diagrams but Lines, all in one straight Line and only distinguishable by difference of size and brightness; so that, when I had finished my treatise (which I entitled ‘Through Flatland to Thoughtland’) I could not feel certain that many would understand my meaning.1 Unable to properly diagram an additional dimension of space, A Square does, at least, apply his ability to explain its properties. The novella ends with the government of Flatland jailing A Square for writing such polemical material, leaving him a sad martyr who claims, “These very tablets on which I am writing, and all the substantial realities of Flatland itself, appear no better than the offspring of a diseased imagination, or the baseless fabric of a dream.”2 1 Edwin A. Abbott, Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 114. 2 Ibid., 118. 1 Figure 1.1 A diagram of A Square's home, taken from Flatland. The drama of Flatland’s narrative aside, there is something to be said about its suggestion that the social conditions of alternate dimensions can be written about from the varying perspectives of a point, a line, a cube, and so forth; understand, for instance, that both A Square and the Stranger from Spaceland can ‘read’ the world of Three Dimensions as a composition of one-dimensional points and two-dimensional planes. And, yes, A Square can describe the world of Three Dimensions to his fellow Flatlanders in the world of Two Dimensions despite his not being from Spaceland. But what if we were to justify the ability of the utterly flat words, semantics, and grammatical structures of a work of fiction like Flatland to generate these socio-spatial dimensions, which we will call social space(s)? In what way can this 2 be done? This kind of question may appear unanswerable or to lead to illogical conclusions, and perhaps here it is permissible to dismiss the question altogether because words printed on a page, without contestation, are of a decidedly two-dimensional quality. But for the moment I ask that you suspend these doubts and consider the earnest plea of A Square: To The Inhabitants of SPACE in GENERAL […] This Work is Dedicated By a Humble Native of Flatland In the Hope that Even as he was Initiated into the Mysteries Of THREE Dimensions Having been previously conversant With ONLY TWO So the Citizens of that Celestial Region May aspire yet higher and higher To the Secrets of FOUR FIVE OR EVEN SIX Dimensions Thereby contributing To the Enlargement of THE IMAGINATION And the possible Development Of that most rare and excellent Gift of MODESTY Among the Superior Races OF SOLID HUMANITY.3 On a level equal with Flatland, the following document concerns itself not with the limits of the visual but with “the enlargement of the imagination,” and not with the shortcomings of the printed word but with its potentialities. To begin this project, first it is sensible to select a few works of fiction that will undergo the proposed analysis. Secondly, defining the present use of social space with the help of theoretical texts will be necessary. Finally, a discussion of how and what kind of social spaces are generated in these fictions will then lead to a set of conclusions. By example of this study, words that compose a piece of fiction can be shown to be conversant with, so as to generate, the dimensions of their own unique social space(s). More specifically, two novels by the same author written over a decade apart will demonstrate two unique approaches to the creation of social space(s) in fiction. 3 Ibid., 5. 3 The Ouvroir de Littérature Potentielle (OuLiPo) & Georges Perec “But presently I came to a smoky light proceeding from a low, wide building, the door of which stood invitingly open.” - from Moby Dick, Herman Melville The Ouvroir de Littérature Potentielle (Ou + li + po = OuLiPo) is a literary workshop comprised of poets, mathematicians, philosophers, and other creative and analytical individuals, all who implement puzzles and patterns into the design of their fictional and non-fictional texts. A fitting way to think of a work written by an Oulipian is to imagine an onion: as you peel off its skin, ovoid layers reveal themselves down to its core. These writers compose texts of a similar, multi-layered quality, at the center of which is a secret, a treasure, that the reader is prompted to actively search for along with the act of reading. Part and parcel of creating an Oulipian text is the implementation of the constraint, which is perhaps the signature characteristic of this breed of literary work. “As a group they exemplify the two principal directions of Oulipian research: analysis, that is, the identification and recuperation of older (even ancient) experiments in form; and synthesis, the elaboration of new forms,”4 writes translator and anthologist of Oulipian works William Motte Jr. Both borrowed from the past and created in the present, these ‘forms’ that Motte writes about function as the constraints, or constraining features, that determine the parameters of an Oulipian text. For example, the haiku, or the form of Japanese poetry that limits a poem strictly to three lines respectively made up of five, seven, and five on (a Japanese term that approximately resembles the English syllable), is an ancient form that can serve as an Oulipian constraint. Other examples of formative constraints used by members of Oulipo are the palindrome (a text spelled exactly the same both forwards and backwards), the lipogram (a text 4 William Motte Jr., Oulipo: A Primer of Potential Literature (Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press, 2008), 1. 4 with one or more letters excluded from the entirety of its body), and the omission of a temporal structure (a narrative that has the effect of being frozen-in-time, a constraint discussed more in depth in this document). Of these constraints Oulipian Jacques Roubaud in La mathématique dans la méthode de Raymond Queneau writes: Another entirely false idea in fashion nowadays is the equivalence which is established between inspiration, exploration of the subconscious, and liberation; between chance, automatism, and freedom. Now the inspiration that consists in blind obedience to every impulse is in reality a sort of slavery. The classical playwright who writes his tragedy observing a certain number of familiar rules is freer than the poet who writes that which comes into his head and who is the slave of other rules of which he is ignorant.5 Roubaud is implying that the writer who acknowledges the constraining forms both inherent in the act of writing and also those that they themselves implement into their own writing are more likely to create texts of an originality that cannot be achieved by the writer who whimsically follows inspiration, lacking rules and structure.