American Indian and Alaska Native Genetics Resource Center

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Indian and Alaska Native Genetics Resource Center American Indian and Alaska Native Genetics Research Resource Guide: Tools for Tribal Leaders and Citizens (PDF of all content in guide) This resource guide was developed by the National Congress of American Indians Policy Research Center with support from the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), which provided funding for the project. The content does not represent the official position of the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health or the Department of Health and Human Services. In this resource guide, the NCAI Policy Research Center does not take a stance in favor of or against American Indian and Alaska Native peoples or communities participating in genetics research. As sovereign entities, tribal governments must make those decisions for themselves. The goal of this guide is to provide tribal leaders and AI/AN peoples with the tools and information they need to make their own informed decisions about genetics research. The authors of the resource guide sections include Native authors with expertise in genetics research related to Native communities. No information will be captured or stored from this website. All responses to the interactive question sections are strictly for the information of the person entering their answers. No answers will be collected or captured by the website. ©National Congress of American Indians 2012 Page 1 Introduction Genetics research is a fast-growing and complicated area. American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) tribal leaders and citizens have raised many questions and concerns about genetics research. They have also expressed an interest in learning more about the science behind genetics and how other tribal communities are making decisions related to genetics research. This resource guide serves to answer these questions, to highlight cases that describe how some tribes are thinking about genetics research, and to provide information and tools for tribes and citizens as they consider their own stances on genetics research. Each person, family, and community is unique and therefore will have a different set of considerations regarding research. Genetics research includes a spectrum of study types, including how genes influence human health, genetic variation between individuals and groups of people, and research on ancient human migration patterns. “Genes” are units of information passed down from parents to child. They are molecules made up of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). “Genomics” is a type of research that examines the “genome” of an individual. The “genome” is all of a person’s DNA, or their genetic blueprint. More detailed information about the basics of genetics and genomics research is available in the Basics of Genetics section of the guide. The main sections of this resource guide are: Frequently Asked Questions: Quick overview of the resource guide, including key considerations in decision making around genetics research; research agreements; and the process of informed consent. Summary Tools: Brief handouts and checklists for tribal leaders, including questions to consider in making decisions related to genetics research, options for control of data, increasing the number of Native scientists, and the use of genetic testing for tribal enrollment. The Basics of Genetics: Stories and handouts for AI/AN communities about the basics of genetics, genetics research, and the relationship between genetics and health. Making Decisions about Genetics Research: A guide to identifying community values to help you make decisions about research in your community, including an interactive set of reflection questions about genetics research. Cases of How Tribes are Relating to Genetics Research: A set of interactive case studies about how tribes across the US have chosen to deal with genetics research, including both tribes that are participating in genetics studies and those that are not. Regulating Genetics Research in Your Community: Templates and models for research contracts, informed consent forms, and tribal control of research data. Enhancing Genomic Research through a Native Lens: A Native scholar’s perspective on the field of genomics research, and a discussion of the need to increase the number of AI/AN scientists. ©National Congress of American Indians 2012 Page 2 Tribal Enrollment and Genetic Testing: Information about the use of DNA testing in determining tribal citizenship or enrollment. People to Contact with Questions: A list of the contributors to this resource guide and other individuals to contact who may be able to assist with questions about genetics research. For Researchers: Information for researchers about how to partner effectively with tribes in genetics research studies. About Us: Background and contact information for the National Congress of American Indians Policy Research Center. ©National Congress of American Indians 2012 Page 3 Frequently Asked Questions Why did the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Policy Research Center develop this resource guide? Genetics research has become a prominent topic of discussion among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. Tribal leaders have raised important questions about this type of research and expressed the need for more resources about genetics research that are specific to AI/AN communities. In June 2010, a session about genetics research was held at the Tribal Leader/Scholar Forum as part of NCAI’s Mid Year Conference. The goal of the session was to begin a dialogue among tribal leaders about genetics research. The idea for the session grew out of a collaboration between the NCAI Policy Research Center and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), which is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). During the session, tribal leaders expressed a desire for more information about genetics research. Session participants commented that they did not yet feel comfortable making decisions about this type of research yet because they needed more details and resources about genetics research. For this reason, the NCAI Policy Research Center and NHGRI decided to initiate the development of a genetics research resource guide for tribal leaders. Over two years, the NCAI Policy Research Center worked to develop the content of this web-based resource guide, with funding and support from the NHGRI. The resources included in this guide were developed by a team of authors with expertise in genetics research, particularly specific considerations for AI/AN peoples. Draft versions of the resource guide were thoroughly reviewed by a panel of AI/AN reviewers and scientists at the NHGRI. How was the content of the guide developed? How were the authors selected? The questions that tribal leaders asked at the Mid Year session in 2010 served as a basis for content development. These questions included, “What is a gene? What is DNA? How is genetic research being conducted? How are genetic data being stored? What control do tribes have over genetic data?” Before developing any content for the resource guide, the project team administered a survey to NCAI Policy Research Center Advisory Council members and NHGRI scientists. The project team also met with the NCAI Executive Board, the NCAI Policy Research Center Advisory Council, and NHGRI scientists to seek their guidance about the project. Based on their feedback, the plans for resource guide content were further refined. The project team then sought out Native scholars and other researchers with particular expertise in genetics research, data sharing, ethical issues, and specific considerations for AI/AN communities. These experts in the field were asked to contribute writings to the resource guide. Specific sections of the guide were developed in response to the questions raised by tribal leaders. The draft resource guide was reviewed by a panel of AI/AN reviewers and NHGRI reviewers, and revised in response to their comments. What is the goal of the guide? The goal of this guide is to provide tribal leaders and AI/AN peoples with the tools and information they need to make their own informed decisions about genetics research. In this resource guide, the NCAI Policy Research Center does not take a stance in favor of or against genetics research. Tribal governments and citizens must make those decisions for ©National Congress of American Indians 2012 Page 4 themselves. As sovereign nations, tribes have taken diverse positions on genetics research in the past, and some tribes have not yet determined their views or policies on genetics research. The tools are provided to assist tribal nations and citizens in their decision making around genetic research, as well as to ensure protection for research participants and communities who do choose to engage in genetics research. What are genes? “Genes” are units of information passed down from parents to child. They are molecules made up of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). More information about the definitions of a gene, genetics research, heredity, and other scientific concepts in genetics research is available in the resource guide. What is genetics research? Genetics research includes a variety of research topics. These include the study of how genes might influence the health of a person, how genes can vary between individuals and groups of people, and the use of genetic information to study how human groups migrated in the past. More information on types of genetics research related to health is available in the resource guide. Who conducts genetics research?
Recommended publications
  • Native Peoples of North America
    Native Peoples of North America Dr. Susan Stebbins SUNY Potsdam Native Peoples of North America Dr. Susan Stebbins 2013 Open SUNY Textbooks 2013 Susan Stebbins This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Published by Open SUNY Textbooks, Milne Library (IITG PI) State University of New York at Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454 Cover design by William Jones About this Textbook Native Peoples of North America is intended to be an introductory text about the Native peoples of North America (primarily the United States and Canada) presented from an anthropological perspective. As such, the text is organized around anthropological concepts such as language, kinship, marriage and family life, political and economic organization, food getting, spiritual and religious practices, and the arts. Prehistoric, historic and contemporary information is presented. Each chapter begins with an example from the oral tradition that reflects the theme of the chapter. The text includes suggested readings, videos and classroom activities. About the Author Susan Stebbins, D.A., Professor of Anthropology and Director of Global Studies, SUNY Potsdam Dr. Susan Stebbins (Doctor of Arts in Humanities from the University at Albany) has been a member of the SUNY Potsdam Anthropology department since 1992. At Potsdam she has taught Cultural Anthropology, Introduction to Anthropology, Theory of Anthropology, Religion, Magic and Witchcraft, and many classes focusing on Native Americans, including The Native Americans, Indian Images and Women in Native America. Her research has been both historical (Traditional Roles of Iroquois Women) and contemporary, including research about a political protest at the bridge connecting New York, the Akwesasne Mohawk reservation and Ontario, Canada, and Native American Education, particularly that concerning the Native peoples of New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’S Lost Colony of Roanoke
    Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’s Lost Colony of Roanoke. Roberta Estes Copyright 2009, all rights reserved, submitted for publication [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract Within genealogy circles, family stories of Native American1 heritage exist in many families whose American ancestry is rooted in Colonial America and traverses Appalachia. The task of finding these ancestors either genealogically or using genetic genealogy is challenging. With the advent of DNA testing, surname and other special interest projects2, tools now exist to facilitate grouping participants in a way that allows one to view populations in historical fashions. This paper references and uses data from several of these public projects, but particularly the Melungeon, Lumbee, Waccamaw, North Carolina Roots and Lost Colony projects3. The Lumbee have long claimed descent from the Lost Colony via their oral history4. The Lumbee DNA Project shows significantly less Native American ancestry than would be expected with 96% European or African Y chromosomal DNA. The Melungeons, long held to be mixed European, African and Native show only one ancestral family with Native DNA5. Clearly more testing would be advantageous in all of these projects. This phenomenon is not limited to these groups, and has been reported by other researchers such as Bolnick (et al, 2006) where she reports finding in 16 Native American populations with northeast or southeast roots that 47% of the families who believe themselves to be full blooded or no less than 75% Native with no paternal European admixture find themselves carrying European or African y-line DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Demographic and Tribal Survival Into the Twenty-First Century
    Native American Demographic and Tribal Survival into the Twenty-first Century Russell Thornton The indigenous tribal populations of North America north of the Rio Grande River—referred to generically here as "Native Americans," a term encompass­ ing American Indians, Inuit (Eskimo), and Aleutian Islanders—declined drasti­ cally following European colonization. How drastic the decline was is debated since estimates of aboriginal population size for the area vary widely. The clas­ sic estimate of aboriginal population size for this area is James Mooney's 1,152,000 million for North America north of the Rio Grande River at first (extensive) European contact (see Mooney 1928). Subsequent scholars gener­ ally accepted Mooney's estimate until 1966, when Henry Dobyns (1966) as­ serted an aboriginal population size for North America north of Mexico of be­ tween 9.8 and 12.25 million; in i983, he increased his asserted size to 18 mil­ lion (north of Mesoamerica) (see Dobyns 1983). Scholars now agree that Mooney's population estimate significantly under­ estimated aboriginal population size for the area north of the Rio Grande River. Most scholars also consider Dobyns's estimates to be excessive, although little consensus for a higher population figure exists. Estimates vary from around 2 million by Douglas Ubelaker (1988) to almost 4 million (reduced from an ear­ lier estimate of almost 4.5 million) by William M. Denevan (1992 [1976], xvii- xxix) to the slightly more than 7 million estimate I arrived at and continue to use (see Thornton and Marsh-Thornton 1981, 47-53; Thornton 1987, 25-32).l My 0026-3079/2005/4603/4-023S2.50/0 American Studies, 46:3/4 (Fall-Winter 2005): 23-38 Indigenous Studies Today, 1 (Fall 2005/Spring 2006) 23 24 Russell Thornton estimate includes somewhat more than 5 million people for the conterminous United States area and somewhat more than 2 million for present-day Canada, Alaska, and Greenland combined.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Native Americans at the National Archives in Atlanta
    Researching Individual Native Americans at the National Archives at Atlanta National Archives at Atlanta 5780 Jonesboro Road Morrow, GA 30260 770-968-2100 www.archives.gov/southeast E-Mail: [email protected] Spring, 2009 Researching Individual Native Americans at the National Archives at Atlanta Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Tribal Association ............................................................................................................................ 1 Race .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Tribal Membership ........................................................................................................................... 2 Textual Records ............................................................................................................................... 2 Native American Genealogy ............................................................................................................ 3 Published Resources ......................................................................................................................... 3 Online Resources ............................................................................................................................. 4 Dawes Commission ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Media Response: Genome of the Ancient One (A.K.A. Kennewick Man) Jennifer Raff Department of Anthropology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, [email protected]
    Human Biology Volume 87 | Issue 2 Article 5 2015 Media response: Genome of the Ancient One (a.k.a. Kennewick Man) Jennifer Raff Department of Anthropology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol Recommended Citation Raff, Jennifer (2015) "Media response: Genome of the Ancient One (a.k.a. Kennewick Man)," Human Biology: Vol. 87: Iss. 2, Article 5. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol87/iss2/5 Media response: Genome of the Ancient One (a.k.a. Kennewick Man) Abstract The uthora discusses the media treatment of the publication of the genome of the Kennewick Man, an 8,500-year-old burial from Washington, closely related to Northern Native Americans. Keywords The Ancient One, Kennewick Man, media, Native Americans This commentary is available in Human Biology: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol87/iss2/5 media response Genome of the Ancient One (a.k.a. Kennewick Man) Jennifer Rafff 1 little over a year ago the complete genome better than that of the Anzick genome paper for sequence of a Clovis individual, the 12,500 several reasons. First, there was very little talk about A Anzick child, was published (Rasmus- the long-discredited “Solutrean hypothesis” (which, sen et al. 2014). His genome gave us a fascinating if it weren’t already in its cofffijin, would have taken glimpse of ancient Native American genetic diver- a further hit with the revelation that Kennewick sity, and new insights into the early peopling of the Man’s genome showed absolutely no evidence of Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Panel on Homelessness Among Native Americans
    Expert Panel on Homelessness among American Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians 1 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Poverty and Overcrowding ....................................................................................................................... 6 Health Disparities ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Violence .................................................................................................................................................... 7 American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Veterans.............................................................. 8 Limitations of Data and Research ............................................................................................................. 8 Homelessness among American Indians, Alaska Natives, and American Indians ........................................ 9 Homelessness among American Indians .................................................................................................. 9 Homelessness among Native Hawaiians................................................................................................. 13 Homelessness
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem Is Marriage: Admixture and Fertility Among Native North Americans, 1888-1903
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2004 The Problem is Marriage: Admixture and Fertility Among Native North Americans, 1888-1903 Desiree Eulalie Plaisance University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Plaisance, Desiree Eulalie, "The Problem is Marriage: Admixture and Fertility Among Native North Americans, 1888-1903. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2004. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4247 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Desiree Eulalie Plaisance entitled "The Problem is Marriage: Admixture and Fertility Among Native North Americans, 1888-1903." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Michael H. Logan, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Benita J. Howell, Hector N. Qirko Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Desiree Eulalie Plaisance entitled "'The Problem is Marriage': Admixtureand Fertility AmongNative North Americans, 1888- 1903." I have examined the finalpaper copy of this thesis forform and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillmentof the requirements forthe degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Roberta Estes
    Roberta Estes ect shows significantly less Native American ancestry than would be expected with 96% European or African Within genealogy circles, family stories of Native Y chromosomal DNA. The Melungeons, long held to be American1 heritage exist in many families whose Ameri- mixed European, African and Native show only one can ancestry is rooted in Colonial America and traverses ancestral family with Native DNA.4 Clearly more test- Appalachia. The task of finding these ancestors either ing would be advantageous in all of these projects. genealogically or using genetic genealogy is challenging. This phenomenon is not limited to these groups, and has With the advent of DNA testing, surname and other been reported by other researchers. For example, special interest projects, tools now exist to facilitate the Bolnick (2006) reports finding in 16 Native American tracing of patrilineal and matrilineal lines in present-day populations with northeast or southeast roots that 47% people, back to their origins in either Native Americans, of the families who believe themselves to be full-blooded Europeans, or Africans. This paper references and uses or no less than 75% Native with no paternal European data from several of these public projects, but particular- admixture, find themselves carrying European or ly the Melungeon, Lumbee, Waccamaw, North Carolina African Y chromosomes. Malhi et al. (2008) reported Roots and Lost Colony projects.2 that in 26 Native American populations, non-Native American Y chromosomes occurred at a frequency as The Lumbee have long claimed descent from the Lost high as 88% in the Canadian northeast, southwest of Colony via their oral history.3 The Lumbee DNA Proj- Hudson Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA and Indigeneity
    DNA and Indigeneity The Changing Role of Genetics in Indigenous Rights, Tribal Belonging, and Repatriation SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS October 22, 2015 Vancouver, British Columbia Canada Attribution and Copyright Notice CCM Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC-BY -NC-ND www.sfu.ca/ipinch 2016 This research was made possible, in part, through the support of the Intellectual Property Issues in Cultural Heritage (IPinCH) project, a Major Collaborative Research Initiative funded by the Social Sciences and Humani- ties Research Council of Canada. Report To Be Cited As: Walker, Alexa, Brian Egan, and George Nicholas (editors). 2016. DNA and Indigeneity: The Changing Role of Ge- netics in Indigenous Rights, Tribal Belonging, and Repatriation. Symposium Proceedings. Intellectual Property Issues in Cultural Heritage (IPinCH) Project, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. ii DNA & Indigeneity Proceedings Acknowledgements Symposium proceedings compiled and edited by Alexa Walker, Brian Egan, and George Nicholas. This event was developed by the Bioarchaeology and Genetics Working Group of the Intellectual Property Issues in Cul- tural Heritage (IPinCH) Project. Funding was provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Coundil (SSRHC) of Canada through a SSHRC Connections Grant, and through Major Collaborative Research Initiative funding. Additional support was provided by Simon Fraser University and the SFU Archeaology Department. Event planning was the responsibility of the Bioarchaeology and Genetics Working Group co-chairs: Alan Goodman, Dorothy Lippert, and Daryl Pullman, along with George Nicholas, Alexa Walker, and Brian Egan. Kristen Dobbin coordinated publicity, developed the program and related materials, and formatted this volume. The design of this volume was inspired by the Indigenous Presence report (Kovach, Carriere, Montgomery, Barrett, and Gilles, 2015), accessible via the University of Regina here: http://bit.ly/1WMX21b.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Alaska Native People Get “Free” Medical Care?...78
    DO ALASKA NATIVE PEOPLE GET FREE MEDICAL CARE?* And other frequently asked questions about Alaska Native issues and cultures *No, they paid in advance. Read more inside. UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE/ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY Holikachuk Unangax (Aleut) Han Inupiaq Alutiiq Tanacross Athabascan Haida (Lower) Tanana Siberian Yupik / St. Lawrence Island Upper Tanana Tsimshian Tlingit Yupik Deg Xinag (Deg Hit’an) Ahtna Central Yup’ik Koyukon Dena’ina (Tanaina) Eyak Gwich'in Upper Kuskokwim DO ALASKA NATIVE PEOPLE GET FREE MEDICAL CARE?* And other frequently asked questions about Alaska Native issues and cultures *No, they traded land for it. See page 78. Libby Roderick, Editor UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE/ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY 2008-09 BOOKS OF THE YEAR COMPANION READER Copyright © 2008 by the University of Alaska Anchorage and Alaska Pacific University Published by: University of Alaska Anchorage Fran Ulmer, Chancellor 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, AK 99508 Alaska Pacific University Douglas North, President 4101 University Drive Anchorage, AK 99508 Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the editors, contributors, and publishers have made their best efforts in preparing this volume, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents. This book is intended as a basic introduction to some very complicated and highly charged questions. Many of the topics are controversial, and all views may not be represented. Interested readers are encouraged to access supplemental readings for a more complete picture. This project is supported in part by a grant from the Alaska Humanities Forum and the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Diabetes in North American Indians and Alaska Natives
    Chapter 34 Diabetes in North American Indians and Alaska Natives Dorothy Gohdes, MD SUMMARY he epidemic of non-insulin-dependent dia- IDDM are found in individuals with significant non- betes mellitus (NIDDM) in Native American Native American ancestry. communities has occurred primarily during the second half of this century. Although Much of our understanding of the natural history of TNIDDM has a genetic component, with rates highest NIDDM in North American Indians is derived from in full-blooded Native Americans, the incidence and the longitudinal epidemiologic studies of the Pima prevalence of the disease have increased dramatically Indians in southern Arizona. The relationship of obe- as traditional lifestyles have been abandoned in favor sity to subsequent diabetes as described in studies of of westernization, with accompanying increases in the Pimas is present in all Native American popula- body weight and diminished physical activity. Anthro- tions. Native American communities experience high pologic studies have shown that several tribes per- rates of microvascular complications from diabetes, ceive diabetes as an assault from outside the commu- although the rates of cardiovascular disease differ nity. Diabetes was once described as benign in Ameri- from tribe to tribe. The differences may reflect geneti- can Indians; now, diabetes and its complications are cally based variations in lipid metabolism or other major contributors to morbidity and mortality in all coronary risk factors or, alternatively, differences in Native American populations, except the isolated Arc- lifestyle. The extent of diabetes in Native American tic groups whose lifestyles remain relatively un- communities today demands public health programs changed. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus that incorporate specific psychosocial and cultural (IDDM) is rare in Native Americans and most cases of adaptations for individual tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • TIP 61 Behavioral Health Services for American Indians and Alaska Natives
    Behavioral Health Services for American Indians and Alaska Natives For Behavioral Health Service Providers, Administrators, and Supervisors TREATMENT IMPROVEMENT PROTOCOL TIP 61 Please share your thoughts about this publication by completing a brief online survey at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KAPPFS The survey takes about 7 minutes to complete and is anonymous. Your feedback will help SAMHSA develop future products. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR TIP 61 AMERICAN INDIANS AND ALASKA NATIVES Executive Summary For Behavioral Health Service Providers, Program Administrators, Clinical Supervisors, and Researchers The Executive Summary of this Treatment Improvement Protocol summarizes substance use and mental illness among American Indians and Alaska Natives and discusses the importance of delivering culturally responsive, evidence-based services to address these behavioral health challenges. TIP Navigation Executive Summary For behavioral health service providers, program administrators, clinical supervisors, and researchers Part 1: Pr actical Guide to the Provision of Behavioral Health Services for American Indians and Alaska Natives For behavioral health service providers Part 2: Imple mentation Guide for Behavioral Health Program Administrators Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives For behavioral health service providers, program administrators, and clinical supervisors Appendix and Index Part 3: Lit erature Review For behavioral health service providers, program administrators, clinical supervisors, and researchers TIP 61 Behavioral
    [Show full text]