Electrochemistry 16.Notebook May 10, 2016
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Environmentally Friendly Anticorrosive Polymeric Coatings
applied sciences Review Environmentally Friendly Anticorrosive Polymeric Coatings Mirko Faccini 1,* , Lorenzo Bautista 2, Laura Soldi 2, Ana M. Escobar 2 , Manuela Altavilla 1, Martí Calvet 2 , Anna Domènech 2 and Eva Domínguez 2 1 Centro de Excelencia en Nanotecnología (CEN), Leitat Chile, Calle Román Díaz 532, Providencia, Santiago 7500724, Chile; [email protected] 2 Leitat Technological Center, Surface Chemistry Area, Applied Chemistry & Materials Department, Terrassa 08225, Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (A.M.E.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (E.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper provides a synthetic and comprehensive overview on environmentally friendly anticorrosive polymeric coatings. Firstly, the economic and environmental impact of corrosion is presented to highlight the need of anticorrosive polymeric coatings as a flexible and effective solution to protect a metal. Secondly, the implementation of regulations together with the consumer awareness for environmental considerations and protection of health are the driving force for a progressive but significant change in the sector. Therefore, within the protective organic coatings market, this article provides a review of the most recent developments in environmentally friendly solutions, including bio-based and water-borne epoxy, hyperbranched polyester for low- volatile organic compounds (VOC) coatings, waterborne polyurethane and non-isocyanate polyurethanes (NIPUs), and graphene or bio-based fillers for acrylics. Moreover, this paper outlines new trends such as smart additives, bio- based corrosion inhibitors, and functional antibiocorrosive coatings as superhydrophobics. Finally, Citation: Faccini, M.; Bautista, L.; industrially relevant applications of environmentally friendly anticorrosive polymeric coatings Soldi, L.; Escobar, A.M.; Altavilla, M.; including solutions for marine and off-shore industries are summarized. -
Process for Purification of Ethylene Compound Having Fluorine-Containing Organic Group
Office europeen des brevets (fi) Publication number : 0 506 374 A1 @ EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION @ Application number: 92302586.0 @ Int. CI.5: C07C 17/38, C07C 21/18 (g) Date of filing : 25.03.92 (30) Priority : 26.03.91 JP 86090/91 (72) Inventor : Kishita, Hirofumi 3-19-1, Isobe, Annaka-shi Gunma-ken (JP) (43) Date of publication of application : Inventor : Sato, Shinichi 30.09.92 Bulletin 92/40 3-5-5, Isobe, Annaka-shi Gunma-ken (JP) Inventor : Fujii, Hideki (84) Designated Contracting States : 3-12-37, Isobe, Annaka-shi DE FR GB Gunma-ken (JP) Inventor : Matsuda, Takashi 791 ~4 YdndSG Anri3k3~shi @ Applicant : SHIN-ETSU CHEMICAL CO., LTD. Gunma-ken (JP) 6-1, Ohtemachi 2-chome Chiyoda-ku Tokyo (JP) @) Representative : Votier, Sidney David et al CARPMAELS & RANSFORD 43, Bloomsbury Square London WC1A 2RA (GB) (54) Process for purification of ethylene compound having fluorine-containing organic group. (57) A process for purifying an ethylene compound having a fluorine-containing organic group (fluorine- containing ethylene compound) by mixing the fluorine-containing ethylene compound with an alkali metal or alkaline earth metal reducing agent, and subjecting the resulting mixture to irradiation with ultraviolet radiation, followed by washing with water. The purification process ensures effective removal of iodides which are sources of molecular iodine, from the fluorine-containing ethylene compound. < h- CO CO o 10 o Q_ LU Jouve, 18, rue Saint-Denis, 75001 PARIS EP 0 506 374 A1 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention 5 The present invention relates to a process for purifying an ethylene compound having a fluorine-containing organic group, and more particularly to a purification process by which iodine contained as impurity in an ethylene compound having a fluorine-containing organic group can be removed effectively. -
Metabolism and Energetics Oxidation of Carbon Atoms of Glucose Is the Major Source of Energy in Aerobic Metabolism
Metabolism and Energetics Oxidation of carbon atoms of glucose is the major source of energy in aerobic metabolism C6H1206 + 6O2 yields 6 CO2 + H20 + energy Energy released ΔG = - 686 kcal/mol Glucose oxidation requires over 25 discrete steps, with production of 36 ATP. Energy Transformations The mitochondrial synthesis of ATP is not stochiometric. Electron–motive force Proton-motive force Phosphoryl-transfer potential in the form of ATP. Substrate level phosphorylation The formation of ATP by substrate-level phosphorylation ADP ATP P CH O P CH2 O P 2 is used to represent HC OH HC OH a phosphate ester: phosphoglycerate CH OH OH CH2 O P kinase 2 P O bisphosphoglycerate 3-phosphoglycerate OH ADP ATP CH2 CH2 CH3 C O P C OH C O pyruvate kinase non-enzymic COOH COOH COOH phosphoenolpyruvate enolpyruvate pyruvate Why ATP? The reaction of ATP hydrolysis is very favorable ΔGo = - 30.5 kJ/mol = - 7.3 kCal/mol 1. Charge separation of closely packed phosphate groups provides electrostatic relief. Mg2+ 2. Inorganic Pi, the product of the reaction, is immediately resonance-stabilized (electron density spreads equally to all oxygens). 3. ADP immediately ionizes giving H+ into a low [H+] environment (pH~7). 4. Both Pi and ADP are more favorably solvated by water than one ATP molecule. 5. ATP is water soluble. The total body content of ATP and ADP is under 350 mmol – about 10 g, BUT … the amount of ATP synthesized and used each day is about 150 mol – about 110 kg. ATP Production - stage 1 - Glycolysis Glycolysis When rapid production of ATP is needed. -
Reductions and Reducing Agents
REDUCTIONS AND REDUCING AGENTS 1 Reductions and Reducing Agents • Basic definition of reduction: Addition of hydrogen or removal of oxygen • Addition of electrons 9:45 AM 2 Reducible Functional Groups 9:45 AM 3 Categories of Common Reducing Agents 9:45 AM 4 Relative Reactivity of Nucleophiles at the Reducible Functional Groups In the absence of any secondary interactions, the carbonyl compounds exhibit the following order of reactivity at the carbonyl This order may however be reversed in the presence of unique secondary interactions inherent in the molecule; interactions that may 9:45 AM be activated by some property of the reacting partner 5 Common Reducing Agents (Borohydrides) Reduction of Amides to Amines 9:45 AM 6 Common Reducing Agents (Borohydrides) Reduction of Carboxylic Acids to Primary Alcohols O 3 R CO2H + BH3 R O B + 3 H 3 2 Acyloxyborane 9:45 AM 7 Common Reducing Agents (Sodium Borohydride) The reductions with NaBH4 are commonly carried out in EtOH (Serving as a protic solvent) Note that nucleophilic attack occurs from the least hindered face of the 8 carbonyl Common Reducing Agents (Lithium Borohydride) The reductions with LiBH4 are commonly carried out in THF or ether Note that nucleophilic attack occurs from the least hindered face of the 9:45 AM 9 carbonyl. Common Reducing Agents (Borohydrides) The Influence of Metal Cations on Reactivity As a result of the differences in reactivity between sodium borohydride and lithium borohydride, chemoselectivity of reduction can be achieved by a judicious choice of reducing agent. 9:45 AM 10 Common Reducing Agents (Sodium Cyanoborohydride) 9:45 AM 11 Common Reducing Agents (Reductive Amination with Sodium Cyanoborohydride) 9:45 AM 12 Lithium Aluminium Hydride Lithium aluminiumhydride reacts the same way as lithium borohydride. -
GALVANIC/DISSIMILAR METAL CORROSION What It Is and How to Avoid It ASSDA Technical FAQ No 1 1 Edition 2, May 2009
AUSTRALIAN STAINLESS STEEL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION GALVANIC/DISSIMILAR METAL CORROSION What it is and how to avoid it ASSDA Technical FAQ No 1 1 Edition 2, May 2009 Contact between dissimilar metals Metal to metal contact The graph shows that stainless steels have occurs frequently but is often not two ranges of potential. The usual, passive Galvanic corrosion can only occur if the a problem. The aluminium head behaviour is shown by the light hatching. dissimilar metals are in electrical contact. However, if the passive film breaks down, on a cast iron block, the solder on The contact may be direct or by an the stainless steel corrodes and its a copper pipe, galvanising on a external pipe or wire or bolt. If the potential is in the dark bar range. steel purlin and the steel fastener dissimilar metals are insulated from each in an aluminium sheet are common other by suitable plastic strips, washers or As a rule of thumb, if the potential examples. sleeves then galvanic corrosion cannot difference is less than 0.1 volt, then it is occur. Paint is not a reliable electrical unlikely that galvanic corrosion will be significant. WHAT CAUSES GALVANIC insulator especially under bolt heads or CORROSION? nuts or washers or near edges of sheets of If all three conditions are met then metal. The paint is usually damaged on galvanic corrosion is probable and the rate For galvanic or dissimilar or installation or by subsequent movement. of corrosion will be influenced by the electrolytic corrosion to occur, Note that the chromium oxide film layer relative area and the current density three conditions must be met: on the stainless steel is very thin and not delivered by the noble metal. -
Chapter 20 Electrochemistry
Chapter 20 Electrochemistry Learning goals and key skills: Identify oxidation, reduction, oxidizing agent, and reducing agent in a chemical equation Complete and balance redox equations using the method of half-reactions. Sketch a voltaic cell and identify its cathode, anode, and the directions in which electrons and ions move. o Calculate standard emfs (cell potentials), E cell, from standard reduction potentials. Use reduction potentials to predict whether a redox reaction is spontaneous. o o Relate E cell to DG and equilibrium constants. Calculate emf under nonstandard conditions. Identify the components of common batteries. Describe the construction of a lithium-ion battery and explain how it works. Describe the construction of a fuel cell and explain how it generates electrical energy. Explain how corrosion occurs and how it is prevented by cathodic protection. Describe the reactions in electrolytic cells. Relate the amounts of products and reactants in redox reactions to electrical charge. Electrochemistry Electrochemistry is the study of the relationships between electricity and chemical reactions. • It includes the study of both spontaneous and nonspontaneous processes. 1 Redox reactions: assigning oxidation numbers Oxidation numbers help keep track of what species loses electrons and what species gains them. • An element is oxidized when the oxidation number increases • An element is reduced when the oxidation number decreases • an oxidizing agent causes another element to be oxidized • a reducing agent causes another element to be reduced. Assigning oxidation numbers (sect. 4.4) 1. Elemental form, each atom has ox. # = 0. Zn O2 O3 I2 S8 P4 2. Simple ions, = charge on ion. -1 for Cl-, +2 for Mg2+ 3. -
Ch. 21.1 Redox Reactions and Electrochemical Cells
Pre-Health Post-Baccalaureate Program Study Guide and Practice Problems Course: CHM2046 Textbook Chapter: 21.1 (Silberberg 6e) Topics Covered: Redox Reactions and Electrochemical Cells Created by Isaac Loy 1. Review Understanding this chapter’s material will depend on an in- depth understanding of redox reactions, which were first covered last semester in ch. 4. We will review redox reactions in this study guide, but it would be wise to review ch. 4 if you are having difficulty with this material. Redox reactions will also be incredibly important moving forward into organic chemistry and biochemistry. 2. Oxidation-Reduction Reactions The mnemonic that you will come back to time and time again for this topic is: “LEO the lion says GER” Where “LEO” stands for Loss of Electrons = Oxidation And “GER” stands for Gain of Electrons = Reduction The oxidizing agent (the substance that is being reduced) pulls electrons from the substance that is being oxidized. The reducing agent (the substance that is being oxidized) gives electrons to the substance that is being reduced. Oxidation and reduction are simultaneous processes. In order for a redox reaction to take place, one substance must be oxidized and the other must be reduced. When working with oxidation numbers to solve problems, the substance being oxidized (LEO -> loss of electrons) becomes more positive. Likewise, the substance being reduced (GER -> gaining electrons) becomes more negative. 3. Using Half-Reactions to Solve Redox Problems Follow the steps below to create half-reactions. It is crucial that you follow the steps in order! A. Split up the overall reaction into two half-reactions, where the species of one reaction is being oxidized, and the species of the other reaction is being reduced. -
Gen Chem II Jasperse Ch. 19 Electrochemistry 1
Gen Chem II Jasperse Ch. 19 Electrochemistry 1 Chapter 19 Electrochemistry Math Summary Relating Standard Cell Potential to Standard Half Cell Potentials Eºcell=Eºoxidation + Eºreduction (standard conditions assume 1.0 M concentrations) Relating Half Cell Potentials when Written in Opposite Directions Eºox = -Eºred for half reactions written in opposite directions Relating Standard Cell Potentials to ∆G ∆Gº = -nFE˚cell (to give answer in kJ, use F = 96.485) F = 96,500 C/mol n=number of electrons transferred Relating Actual Cell Potential to Standard Cell Potential when Concentrations aren't 1.0-M Ecell = Eºcell -[0.0592/n] log Q (Q = ratio of actual concentrations) Relating Standard Cell Potential to Equilibrium Constant log K = nEº/0.0592 Relating Actual Cell Potential to Actual Concentrations in Concentration Cells Ecell = -[0.0592/n] log Q for concentration cells, where anode and cathode differ only in concentration, but otherwise have same ions Relating # of Moles of Electrons Transferred as a Function of Time and Current in Electrolysis 1 mol e- = 96,500 C moles of electrons = [current (A)•time (sec)]/96,500 for electrolysis, moles, current, and time are related. rearranged: time (sec)=(moles of electrons)(96500)/current (in A) Note: 3600 sec/hour so time (hours)=(moles of electrons)(26.8)/current (in A) Electrochemistry-Related Units C = Coulomb = quantity of electrical charge = 6.24 • 1018 electrons • 1 mole of electrons = 96,500 C A = amp = rate of charge flow per time = C/sec V = volt = electrical power/force/strength = J/C 96,500C 96.5 kJ F = Faraday = = mole e− mole e− •V € € Gen Chem II Jasperse Ch. -
Evolution of the First Metabolic Cycles
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 200-204, January 1990 Evolution Evolution of the first metabolic cycles (chemoautotrophy/reductive citric acid cycle/origin of life/pyrite) GUNTER WACHTERSHAUSER 8000 Munich 2, Tal 29, Federal Republic of Germany Communicated by Karl Popper, October 12, 1989 (received for review February 28, 1989) ABSTRACT There are two alternatives concerning the genobacter thermophilus (13), and Desulfobacter hydro- origin of life: the origin may be heterotrophic or autotrophic. genophilus (14) and also in the sulfur-associated archaebac- The central problem within the theory of an autotrophic origin teria Thermoproteus neutrophilus (15) and, partly demon- is the first process of carbon fixation. I here propose the strated, in Sulfolobus brierleyi (16). As suggested by Kandler hypothesis that this process is an autocatalytic cycle that can be and Stetter (16) and previously by Hartmann (17), it may be retrodictively constructed from the extant reductive citric acid considered to be of great antiquity and the evolutionary cycle by replacing thioesters by thioacids and by assuming that precursor ofthe oxidative Krebs cycle. It is here conjectured the required reducing power is obtained from the oxidative to be the extant candidate for the reconstruction of the formation of pyrite (FeS2). This archaic cycle is strictly archaic autocatalytic cycle of carbon fixation. chemoautotrophic: photoautotrophy is not required. The cycle The presently accepted form of the extant reductive citric is catalytic for pyrite formation and autocatalytic for its own acid cycle is shown in Fig. 1 in a somewhat unusual repre- multiplication. It is a consequence of this hypothesis that the sentation, twisted in an 8. -
Material for Teachers
For Teachers How Best to Maintain a Metal Bridge? Teacher Guide This decision making exercise is intended to reinforce previous knowledge on rusting. It introduces through simple laboratory experiments, which students can plan (if the students are unaware), the need for oxygen and water to be present for rusting to occur. The exercise also allows students to explore the use of a sacrificial metal to protect iron and includes theoretical understanding of reactions between dissimilar metals (depending on the conceptual level required by the curriculum). As a major aspect of the script, a decision making exercise is introduced. Students are called upon to reflect on factors (besides scientific ideas) that need to be taken into account in making a decision on the most appropriate way to protect a metal bridge. This may range from doing nothing - the cheapest, to galvanising it - a scientific answer. In between could be environmental, economic or societal solutions. All are possibilities, but the difficulty is to decide which is the most appropriate and then to explain the choice. Lesson Learning Outcomes Lesson 1 At the end of this lesson, students are expected to be able to: • State that iron rusts • Suggest ways to investigate the factors that cause iron to rust Lesson 2 At the end of this lesson, students are expected to be able to: • Undertake and understand experiments that can be performed to show the factors that cause iron to rust Developer: Jack Holbrook Institute: ICASE Country: UK Lesson 3 At the end of this lesson, students are expected to be able to: • Explain why oxygen and water are needed for iron to rust • Suggest a formula for rust Lesson 4 At the end of this lesson, students are expected to be able to : • Suggest experimental procedures to determine the sacrificial metal when two metals are put together • Predict the likely outcome when metals are put together in an atmosphere that prvides both oxygen and water. -
20 More About Oxidation–Reduction Reactions
More About 20 Oxidation–Reduction Reactions OOC n important group of organic reactions consists of those that O A involve the transfer of electrons C from one molecule to another. Organic chemists H OH use these reactions—called oxidation–reduction reactions or redox reactions—to synthesize a large O variety of compounds. Redox reactions are also important C in biological systems because many of these reactions produce HH energy. You have seen a number of oxidation and reduction reactions in other chapters, but discussing them as a group will give you the opportunity to CH3OH compare them. In an oxidation–reduction reaction, one compound loses electrons and one com- pound gains electrons. The compound that loses electrons is oxidized, and the one that gains electrons is reduced. One way to remember the difference between oxidation and reduction is with the phrase “LEO the lion says GER”: Loss of Electrons is Oxi- dation; Gain of Electrons is Reduction. The following is an example of an oxidation–reduction reaction involving inorganic reagents: Cu+ + Fe3+ ¡ Cu2+ + Fe2+ In this reaction,Cu+ loses an electron, so Cu+ is oxidized. Fe3+ gains an electron, so Fe3+ is reduced. The reaction demonstrates two important points about oxidation– reduction reactions. First, oxidation is always coupled with reduction. In other words, a compound cannot gain electrons (be reduced) unless another compound in the reaction simultaneously loses electrons (is oxidized). Second, the compound that is oxidized (Cu+) is called the reducing agent because it loses the electrons that are used to reduce the other compound (Fe3+). Similarly, the compound that is reduced (Fe3+) is called the oxidizing agent because it gains the electrons given up by the other compound (Cu+) when it is oxidized. -
Galvanneal Zinc Coating – Paintable & Weldable Galvanized
Specifications Prime Steel Designations & Weights Engineering Data WIZcoat™ galvannealed strut is pro- WIZcoat™ galvannealed strut is pro- Galvannealed G-Strut® is produced duced from prime, hot-rolled carbon duced from steel that is designed to from hot roll carbon steel (ASTM 570) to steel substrate. Material conforms to meet requirements for forming, draw- the following mill certification physical/ the ASTM A653 specification and is ing, bending, welding and painting mechanical properties. Average yield produced from structural grade steel – conforming to designations and test strength: 42,700 pounds; Average ten- (See Engineering Data.) limits in accordance with provisions of sile strength, 62,600 pounds; Average Rockwell B (RB Value) range: 62 – 74. Produced on Gregory’s own specialty ASTM A653. Modified Sendzimir Hot-Dip Galvanizing Finish ISO CERTS - Quality Control Line, coils are alkaline-cleaned, pickled The silvery matte finish and low reflec- Gregory Industries upholds the highest and galvannealed in one continuous tivity of galvannealed coatings provides industry standards, conforming to and process. excellent weldability and paint-adher- maintaining ISO 9001; 2000 – ANSI/ Galvanneal Zinc Coating Paintability ence properties without special surface ISO/ASQ Q9001-2000 certification for the manufacture and supply of galva- WIZcoat™ galvannealed strut is designed treatment. – Paintable & Weldable Galvanized – nized steel coils. [Certificate # 112358- for superior paint adhesion. The process Galvannealed Coating Specs. 0, registration # 1132-01]. induces an ideal surface that is a zinc (Standard & metric) alloy well suited to painting. The resulting Galvannealed Minimum Minimum Minimum G-STRUT® benefits from this detailed surface forms microscopic crevices that Coating Triple Spot Triple Spot Single Spot QC process.