DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT Report on Procurement Update and OJEU

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT Report on Procurement Update and OJEU ‘NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY REPORT TITLE: CONSULTATIONS AND POLICY UPDATE REPORT OF: HEAD OF OPERATIONS FOR SUBMISSION TO: DATE: AUTHORITY MEETING 28 September 2017 SUMMARY OF REPORT: This report provides the regular update on consultations and policy issues which have the potential to impact on Authority operations or activities. The report is principally focussed on one issue for this meeting, namely the consultation draft London Environment Strategy of the London Mayor. The report sets out key aspects of the consultation draft document for Member consideration and recommends authority is delegated to submit a formal response. The Deputy Mayor for Environment and Energy will give a presentation to the meeting. The report also notes a response to the GLA’s Environment Committee and planning matters that may affect the Authority’s principal place of business in Tottenham Hale. RECOMMENDATION: The Authority is recommended to delegate authority to the Head of Operations, in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chairs to submit a response on behalf of the Authority to the draft London Environment Strategy. SIGNED: ________________________________ Head of Operations DATE: 18 September 2017 1. PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE OF REPORT 1.1 The Consultations and Policy Update report is a regular report which provides an update for Members on consultations and policy issues that are relevant to the Authority such that the proposals have the potential to affect the Authority’s operations and/or costs. The report additionally seeks approval for responses where appropriate. 1.2 This report is principally concerned with the Mayor of London’s consultation draft Environment Strategy. It also notes planning matters that may affect the Authority’s principal place of business in Tottenham Hale. 2. THE MAYOR OF LONDON’S ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY 2.1 As reported at the June Authority meeting the Greater London Authority (GLA) has a duty to develop a capital wide environment strategy, the London Environment Strategy (LES). The Authority will also have a duty to be in general conformity with the waste elements of the LES. The long term implications of the aims, objectives and implementation of the LES for the capital and its residents, workers and visitors were also noted at the last Authority meeting. 2.2 Authority officers had attended a pre-consultation LES ‘strategic engagement workshop’ with the GLA but also concluded that it may provide a helpful addition to the dialogue on the LES if the Authority provided further input at the pre-consultation stage. Following approval at the June Authority meeting the Head of Operations was delegated to submit representations to the London Mayor in consultation with the Chair, concerning the issues that the Authority considered of greatest importance in the expected LES. The Chair subsequently sent a letter to the Deputy Mayor for Environment and Energy which is included as Appendix 1 to this report. 2.3 The following points which were made in the Chair’s letter are incorporated into the consultation draft LES: 2.3.1 A commitment to a circular economy approach for the capital – Chapter 10 of the consultation draft LES sets out measures for a transition to a low carbon circular economy. 2.3.2 Integration of businesses within the scope of the LES – The contribution of the business community is incorporated throughout the document, although it is not clear if or how the European programmes of Extended Producer Responsibility (or post-Brexit equivalents) might contribute to driving the circular economy forward in London. Officers are also enquiring about the calculations of recycling target achievement to understand how much businesses will contribute towards the achievement of the municipal recycling target for the capital or how businesses might be incentivised to do more. 2.3.3 Clarity is provided about the retention of the Emissions Performance Standard, which will be retained alongside tonnage based recycling targets and the Carbon Intensity Floor. Proposal 7.3.2a sets out that waste authorities are expected to demonstrate how they meet the greenhouse gas Emissions Performance Standard (EPS). Proposal 7.3.2b states that “Waste authorities much demonstrate how solutions generating energy from waste meet the carbon intensity floor (CIF), or put in place demonstrable steps to meet it in the short-term.” It is expected that the proposed Energy Recovery Facility at the EcoPark will be able to achieve the CIF when the proposed local heat network is fully operational. 2.3.4 A commitment to behaviour change including communications to increase recycling and reduce waste. This will be delivered by working with the London Waste and Recycling Board (LWARB) and Resource London, waste authorities and other relevant parties. The Mayor will support campaigns including Recycle for London, Love Food Hate Waste and Trifocal to help Londoners and businesses to reduce waste. The take-up of recycling services by local residents and businesses will be critical to the achievement of LES recycling targets. 2.3.5 There is also mention of recycling scheme standardisation to make recycling systems easier to understand if residents move around the capital. This is a matter for the constituent borough councils in the first instance. 2.3.6 Explicit links are made with the London Plan and specifically to the need for regional self-sufficiency in managing London’s waste within the capital. The consultation draft LES also sets out a number of areas in which the Mayor expects the new London Plan to contain additional new policies and proposals to further protect the environment. 2.4 However, there are some points in the Chair’s letter that the Authority might seek to be expanded upon in the final LES: 2.4.1 The importance of waste infrastructure is mentioned; it appears that support for infrastructure will be delivered primarily through London Plan requirements and the work of the London Waste and Recycling Board. Officers are seeking a better understanding of the GLA’s assessment of the scale of the need and the direct steps needed to deliver the step-changes sought by the Mayor. 2.4.2 Similarly, it will be necessary for officers to engage further with GLA counterparts to develop a more detailed picture of the scope of the test of “general conformity” and it will be applied in practice. 2.4.3 Finally, officers believe that it would be helpful to all if links to other Mayoral strategies could be more explicitly referenced so that any new service developments can readily consider these from the outset. 3. KEY ASPECTS OF THE CONSULTATION DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY 3.1 On 11 August the Mayor of London launched the consultation on his draft LES which runs until 17 November. The LES integrates six different environmental policy areas into one document with the aim of protecting and improving London’s environment and protecting the health of Londoners. From cleaning up London’s air to improving green spaces in the city and cutting carbon emissions, the LES sets the long-term ambition for making London cleaner and greener in the light of anticipated population and housing growth in the capital. The LES covers a period of 33 years from 2017 – 2050. 3.2 The following sections of this report provide a summary of the key aspects of the LES which are relevant to NLWA. It is anticipated that constituent boroughs will be responding separately and will be commenting upon a broader range of issues than NLWA. 3.3 The most relevant and important section of the LES for NLWA is Chapter 7 about ‘Waste’. Key points to note are: 3.3.1 A Mayoral aim for London to become zero waste by 2026 which means no biodegradable or recyclable waste going to landfill by that date and by 2030 65% of London’s municipal solid waste (MSW) to be recycled. 3.3.2 The Mayor wants waste authorities to collectively achieve a 50% local authority collected waste (LACW) recycling target by 2025 and aspire to achieve 60% by 2030. 3.3.3 Landfill and incineration are “undesirable” although the role of energy- from-waste is acknowledged in managing London’s non-recyclable municipal waste. The LES states that London will have sufficient incineration capacity to manage non-recyclable municipal waste once the new Edmonton and Beddington Lane energy recovery facilities are built. 3.3.4 Effective recycling is reported as able to give local authorities a reliable high value income stream which can be used to help offset costs associated with service improvements. 3.3.5 Waste prevention is prioritised in the LES and the document notes that the LES will take a circular approach to London’s use of resources that designs out waste, keeps materials in use at their highest value for as long as possible and minimises environmental impact. The two priorities for waste prevention in the LES are reducing food waste and single use packaging because “they offer the biggest opportunity for change.” 3.3.6 The LES notes that waste authorities in performing their waste functions, need to show how they are “acting in general conformity with the municipal waste provisions” of the LES but that general conformity only applies to local authority collected waste (LACW) activities and that acting in conformity cannot bring excessive additional costs to waste authorities. The Mayor also has the power to direct a waste authority where he considers their waste activities to be detrimental to implementing the municipal waste provisions in the LES. The Mayor has no power of direction over businesses or private waste management companies. A series of London Mayoral expectations of waste authorities is included in this Chapter – see Table 1 below. Table 1 – Waste Authority Expectations The Mayor expects waste authorities to deliver the following in order to show they are acting in general conformity with the LES’s municipal waste management policies and proposals.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coal Power Station
    Copyright © Tarek Kakhia. All rights reserved. http://tarek.kakhia.org Coal Power Station ( Fly Ash , Bottom Ash & Flue Gas Desulfurization ) BY Tarek Ismail Kakhia 1 Copyright © Tarek Kakhia. All rights reserved. http://tarek.kakhia.org Contents No Item Page 1 Fossil - fuel power station 3 2 Chimney 11 3 Fly Ash -1 21 4 Fly Ash -2 44 5 Electrostatic precipitator 44 4 Bottom Ash 52 7 Flue - Gas Desulfurization ( FGD ) 53 8 Flue-gas emissions from fossil-fuel combustion 44 1 Flue - gas stack 47 10 Calcium Sulfite 72 11 Calcium bi sulfite 73 12 Calcium sulfate 74 2 Copyright © Tarek Kakhia. All rights reserved. http://tarek.kakhia.org Fossil - fuel power station Contents 1 Basic concepts o 1.1 Heat into mechanical energy 2 Fuel transport and delivery 3 Fuel processing 4 Steam - electric 5 Gas turbine plants 6 Reciprocating engines 7 Environmental impacts o 7.1 Carbon dioxide o 7.2 Particulate matter o 7.3 Radioactive trace elements o 7.4 Water and air contamination by coal ash . 7.4.1 Range of mercury contamination in fish 8 Greening of fossil fuel power plants o 8.1 Low NOx Burners o 8.2 Clean coal 9 Combined heat and power 10 Alternatives to fossil fuel power plants o 10.1 Relative cost by generation source - Introduction : A fossil - fuel power station is a power station that burns fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas or petroleum (oil) to produce electricity. Central station fossil - fuel power plants are designed on a large scale for continuous operation. In many countries, such plants provide most of the electrical energy used.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Designation 3 Conservation Area Boundary 4 Brief
    1.9 In line with the guidance given by both the 2 DESIGNATION Government and English Heritage, therefore, this conservation area profile will aim to define the 2.1 The Sands End Conservation Area was character of the conservation area on the basis of designated in 1991. The conservation area was an analysis of all or some of the following designated because of the importance of criteria:- protecting the riverside from unsympathetic development and to encourage the preservation the origins and development of the street and enhancement of the riverside itself, ensuring patterns, the lie of the land; that new development is of a good and archaeological significance and potential of appropriate design. the area, including any scheduled monuments; the architectural and historic quality, 3 CONSERVATION AREA character and coherence of the buildings, both BOUNDARY listed and unlisted, and the contribution which they make to the special interest of the area; 3.1 The area is in the southernmost part of the the character and hierarchy of spaces, and borough, fronting and incorporating the River townscape quality; Thames between the Chelsea Railway Bridge and the Hurlingham Conservation Area. prevalent and traditional building materials for buildings, walls and surfaces; 3.2 To the north and west, the conservation area the contribution made to the character of boundary extends from the railway bridge at the area by greens or green spaces, trees, hedges Battersea Reach along Townmead Road and and other natural or cultivated elements; Carnwath Road to Broomhouse Lane. This includes the slipway to the river at Broomhouse the prevailing (or former) uses within the Dock.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankside Power Station: Planning, Politics and Pollution
    BANKSIDE POWER STATION: PLANNING, POLITICS AND POLLUTION Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Stephen Andrew Murray Centre for Urban History University of Leicester 2014 Bankside Power Station ii Bankside Power Station: Planning, Politics and Pollution Stephen Andrew Murray Abstract Electricity has been a feature of the British urban landscape since the 1890s. Yet there are few accounts of urban electricity undertakings or their generating stations. This history of Bankside power station uses government and company records to analyse the supply, development and use of electricity in the City of London, and the political, economic and social contexts in which the power station was planned, designed and operated. The close-focus adopted reveals issues that are not identified in, or are qualifying or counter-examples to, the existing macro-scale accounts of the wider electricity industry. Contrary to the perceived backwardness of the industry in the inter-war period this study demonstrates that Bankside was part of an efficient and profitable private company which was increasingly subject to bureaucratic centralised control. Significant decision-making processes are examined including post-war urban planning by local and central government and technological decision-making in the electricity industry. The study contributes to the history of technology and the environment through an analysis of the technologies that were proposed or deployed at the post-war power station, including those intended to mitigate its impact, together with an examination of their long-term effectiveness. Bankside made a valuable contribution to electricity supplies in London until the 1973 Middle East oil crisis compromised its economic viability.
    [Show full text]
  • Sands End Revisited a Local History Guide
    SANDS END REvisitED A Local HISToRy GuIDE We found useful information at the Archive and Local History centre in Hammersmith. There were people that came into school and helped us with our research because they had been residents in Sands End or pupils at Langford many years ago. We also went to Elizabeth Barnes Court Old People’s home to hear more stories and memories of people who knew Sands End in the past. Some of the places in Sands End are named after people that lived here, for example Bagley’s Lane, is named after the Bagley family, locally well known for market gardening and were called the ‘Kings of Fulham’. Elaysha This local history guide about the Sands End area, has been compiled by Y6 from Langford Primary school. Working in partnership with Hammersmith and Fulham Urban Studies Centre, LBHF’s Archives and Local History Centre, and local interest group Sands End Revisited, Oak class became ‘History Detectives’ and were taken back in time to discover the stories of Sands End and the changes that have taken place over the years. By visiting local landmarks, such as the Community Centre on Broughton Road - which was once the old Sunlight laundry - examining old photos at the Archives, and sharing the memories of former local residents and pupils of Langford School, the children discovered a wealth of information, learnt about the changes that have taken place over the years and tried to uncover any secrets about the local area. The stories presented here are a mixture of fact, personal experience, and maybe a little bit of urban myth thrown in to really get you thinking! Thanks to Heritage Lottery Fund for the grant to produce the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Existing Buildings to District Heating Networks Technical Report
    Connecting Existing Buildings to District Heating Networks Technical Report 035317 14 DeCember 2016 Revision 00 Copyright © 1976 - 2016 BuroHappold Engineering. All Rights Reserved. Revision Description Issued by Date Checked 00 TeChniCal Report – Approved by GLA MD 14-DeC-2016 AY, SW This report has been prepared for the sole benefit, use and information of Greater London Authority for the purposes set out in the report or instruCtions Commissioning it. The liability of Buro Happold Limited in respeCt of the information Contained in the report will not extend to any third party. author Dr Mark Dowson date 14 Dec 2016 approved Alasdair Young signature date 14 Dec 2016 ConneCting Existing Buildings to DistriCt Heating Networks Copyright © 1976 - 2016 BuroHappold Engineering. All Rights Reserved. Page 3 Contents Executive Summary 9 1 Introduction 13 1.1 Context 13 1.2 BaCkground 13 1.3 ObjeCtives and outComes 14 1.4 University partners 15 2 Methodology 16 2.1 Deliverables 16 2.2 Work PaCkages 16 2.3 Report struCture 17 3 Building Typology Assessment (WP1A) 19 3.1 Overview 19 3.2 DomestiC building typology assessment 19 3.3 Non-domestiC building typology assessment 26 3.4 Summary 32 4 Building Typology Spatial Mapping (WP1B) 33 4.1 Overview 33 4.2 DomestiC building typology spatial mapping 33 4.3 Non-domestiC spatial mapping 36 5 Building Typology Retrofit Technical Requirements (WP2A) 41 5.1 Overview 41 5.2 Building stock review 41 5.3 Baseline typology CharaCteristiCs 44 5.4 Load modelling 47 5.5 DistriCt heating conneCtion strategies 49 5.6 DomestiC retrofit strategy 50 5.7 Non-domestiC retrofit strategy 54 5.8 Summary 55 6 Building Typology Retrofit Cost Modelling (WP2B) 56 6.1 Overview 56 6.2 Pipework design 56 6.3 Cost references 60 6.4 Cost summary 63 6.5 Observations 64 6.6 Centralised DHW storage 65 6.7 Summary 65 7 Cost Effectiveness & Retrofit Spatial Mapping (WP3A) 66 ConneCting Existing Buildings to DistriCt Heating Networks Copyright © 1976 - 2016 BuroHappold Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Tales of the Thames Path from Hammersmith to Chelsea
    Tales of the Thames Path from Hammersmith to Chelsea A Guide by Local Children Black Lion Pub Ghost 1 Story In the early 1800s the Black Lion pub in Hammersmith was rumoured to be haunted by a ghost! The terrifying ghost roamed the streets and lanes around a nearby graveyard. Did you know that a lady was scared by the ‘ghost’ and never recovered from the shock and died soon after? 2 Kelmscott House/William Morris Local men decided to hunt the Kelmscott House is a Georgian mansion Ghost but accidentally shot an at 26 Upper Mall. William Morris lived here innocent man in the process. and made beautiful carpets and designed Come along to the Thames Path to wallpapers which were very popular in discover more yourself! England. He was a revolutionary force in Victorian Britain: his work as an artist, There are birds that always fly designer, craftsman, writer and socialist High, high up in the sky dramatically changed the fashions and thinking of the era. He lived at Kelmscott But in times more polluted House from 1878 to 1896. In 1891 he founded Like the Industrial factories with the Kelmscott Press to publish limited- their chimneys sooted edition illustrated books. Factories sending water to the east And the quality is not the best All the herons in the sky And in the winter saying bye bye Lots of people in the boats All of them wearing fluffy coats Nikoden - St Peters CE School The basement and coach house serve as headquarters for the William Morris Society. Kelmscott House Museum is open to the public Thursdays and Saturday from 2–5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinematic Urban Geographies
    Screening Spaces Series Editor Pamela Robertson Wojcik Dept. of Film, Television, and Theatre University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana, USA Screening Spaces is a series dedicated to showcasing interdisciplinary books that explore the multiple and various intersections of space, place, and screen cultures. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/14491 François Penz • Richard Koeck Editors Cinematic Urban Geographies Editors François Penz Richard Koeck Department of Architecture School of Architecture University of Cambridge University of Liverpool Cambridge, United Kingdom Liverpool, United Kingdom Screening Spaces ISBN 978-1-137-46830-7 ISBN 978-1-137-46084-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-46084-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017940414 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Laurence, Scott & Electromotors Ltd
    PBnni irTIOKI DAD^TFR aVn-S’ variable speed A. C. motor, 1450/480 rl\U U U U I IW IN D U U JI Cl\ POUTECHi 'R'P-M- driyinZ Shards Horizontal Borer. It is a fact that in numerous instances the application of an ‘ N.S. ’ variable speed A.C. motor, by enabling the speed to be adjusted instantly and exactly to the best value, has greatly improved the performance of machines of many kinds, as discerning designers and users are quick to appreciate. LAURENCE, SCOTT & ELECTROMOTORS LTD. Electrical Engineers since 1883 NORWICH & MANCHESTER E l e c t r ic a l R e v ie w January 26, 1945 The reliability of the generating plant is the same as that of its dis­ tributive cable. And the reliability of the cable is that of its insulation! That is why leading cable manufacturers use Tullis R u s s e ll Rothmill Cable Insulating Papers. Rothmill is renowned for its uniformly highquality.and isguaranteed free from metals and grit. R o t h iiiill A complete range is manu­ CABLE INSULATING PAPERfactured. W rite for details. T u llii ‘i& vn ell rC o Jix d The Pioneers of Twin-wire Papers for Printers AUCHMUTY & ROTHES PAPER MILLS, MARKINCH, SCOTLAND LONDON MANCHESTER BIRMINGHAM I Tudor Street, E.C.4 372 Corn Exchange Bldgs., 116 Colmore Row Corporation Street ____________ ________________________ January 26, 1945 E l e c t r ic a l R e v ie w I T h is new “ Sieray ” fluorescent lamp is identical with the standard Siemens “ Sieray ” D aylight fluorescent lamp, except that it gives a white, warmer, and more pleasing light» co mparable to Sunlight, and possesses the same qualities cf High Efficiency and Coolness in operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Waste to Energy Systems in Metropolitan America
    IMPLEMENTATION OF WASTE TO ENERGY SYSTEMS IN METROPOLITAN AMERICA Prepared for: Jon Ratner, Forest City Enterprises I May 2012 Author : Brinda Sen Gupta Tulane School of Architecture I Candidate, Master of Sustainable Real Estate Development IMPLEMENTATION OF WASTE TO ENERGY SYSTEMS IN METROPOLITAN AMERICA I BRINDA SEN GUPTA I 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION BROAD DEFINITION 4 SIGNIFICANCE 5 TYPES 6 Incineration 6 Gasification 7 Anaerobic Digestion 8 INNOVATION AND OUTPUTS 10 Heating and Electricity 10 Compressed Biogas 10 Bioethanol 11 PERCEPTION 13 Health Risks 13 Aesthetic Factors 14 Economic Impact 14 Social Perceptions 15 CASE STUDIES CLEVELAND 15 LONDON 18 LINKOPING 20 LUBECK 22 RISKS AND MITIGANTS MARKET TIMING 24 FINANCIAL RISKS 26 MARKET ANALYSIS CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS 27 DEMAND 28 COMPETITIVE SUPPLY 29 SITING THE PROJECT 31 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 32 LAND USE PLANNING: CLOSED LOOP SYSTEM 34 CONCLUSION 35 IMPLEMENTATION OF WASTE TO ENERGY SYSTEMS IN METROPOLITAN AMERICA I BRINDA SEN GUPTA I 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Forest City Enterprises currently spends approximately $150 million in energy costs per annum. This proposal seeks to offset this expense by analyzing the viability of Waste-to-Energy as a potential solution. The driving components of this proposal are: analysis of types of WTE systems, case studies of urban WTE implementations, and the feasibility of this system in an urban area within the United States: Waste-to-Energy Systems create energy using incineration, gasification or anaerobic digestion of waste products. This system is particularly efficient because its advantage is many-fold: By using Waste-to-Energy, the cost and environmental hazards of land-filling is significantly mitigated; as recycling is a large part of the pretreatment of waste collected, there is a greater level of reuse of existing materials; and the embodied energy of waste can be harnessed for use by the people who contribute to its levels.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSUMER SAMPLING Ii Electrical Review April 2 8 , 1 9 4 4 PRIDE & PREJUDICE
    ELECTRICAL REVIEW, APRIL 28TH, 19 4-1 { • CONSUMER SAMPLING ii Electrical Review April 2 8 , 1 9 4 4 PRIDE & PREJUDICE It is with feelings of pride that we look back upon our pioneering efforts in the introduction of Fusion Weldecj boiler drums and pressure vessels, as it is yet another successful surmounting of the prejudice of ill-informed criticism . This construction was accepted by Lloyd’s Register of Shipping on the 24th May, 1935, and subsequently by all recognised engineering Insurance Companies, the Board of Trade, the Admiralty and the British Standards Institution (B.S.I 113 : 1943). This is no small testimonial to the willingness of legislative bodies to alter their Regulations permitting legitimate progress based on sound engineering principles. April 28, 1944 E l e c t r ic a l R e v ie w 1 . c f Hen? Only the expert yachtsman knows how to take every advan­ tage of a varying w in d . It is no job for amateurs. The same applies to the design of Water-heaters having to operate in various kinds of “ W aters.” All a matter of experience in knowing how to go on the right “ T a c k .” LEADERS IN Ch\ EAT * ELECTRIC “ WATER HEATING HEATRAE LTD., NORWICH • PHONE : NORWICH 25131 • GRAMS : HEATRAE, NORWICH W E M A K E TAG ELECTRIC WELDING MACHINES SPOT, SEAM AND BUTT FOR WIRELES8 WELDERS AND 8IM ILAR A WIDE RANGE OF 35 y a rn ’ axparlenca CONNECTIONS SIZE8 IN 8TOCK Automatic or Non- ROSSCOURTNEY & Co.Ltd. Automatic ASHBROOK ROAD, LONDON, N.I9 With or without Electric Control Tho quickest and most economical method ot Welding Oil Drums, Bars, SIT SCREWS Tyres, Wheel Rims, 11 k V A S p o t W e ld er Tubes and Angles.
    [Show full text]
  • PDU Case Report XXXX/YY Date
    GLA/4509/WR 20 May 2019 Riverside Energy Park, Belvedere In the London Borough of Bexley Planning Inspectorate reference: EN010093 National Infrastructure Project Development Consent Order application - Written representation Development Consent Order, Section 90 of Planning Act 2008 Proposed development Cory Environmental Holdings propose to develop ‘an integrated multi-technology Riverside energy generation park (REP) including an Energy Recovery Facility (ERF incinerator), Anaerobic Digestion Facility, Solar Panels, Battery Storage and electrical connection route’. As the Riverside Energy Park would have an electricity generating capacity over 50MWe, it is classified as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project under section 14(1)(a) and section 15(2) of the Planning Act 2008. Strategic impacts and summary • Heat demand: there is insufficient heat demand in the local area for the proposed ERF to operate as an effective CHP plant. The applicant overstates the CHP opportunities. The applicant’s existing energy from waste plant, adjacent to the proposed site, could meet all identified local need with only 70% of its heat supply capacity. • Renewable Energy: Feedstock is expected to be less than 50% renewable. • Carbon: Inadequate evidence provided to demonstrate that the ERF will meet the Carbon Intensity Floor Mayoral policy. The proposed ERF operating in power-only mode would be a net carbon producer, and not a carbon reducer. • Waste: Modelling indicates that if the Mayor achieves his recycling and reduction targets, London will have surplus energy from waste capacity by 2030, when considering all existing and permitted incinerators. Permitting further EfW capacity will undermine achievement of the Mayor’s recycling and reduction targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Character Reaches
    Part 4 : Character Reaches Jane ~ St Paul’s Primary School, Hammersmithmith PART 4: CHARACTER REACHES 4.1 Thames Strategy - Kew t o Chelsea IDENTIFICATION OF CHARACTER REACHES As detailed in Part 1, the study area has been The character reaches comprise the following: divided into eight character reaches which have 1. Kew and Strand on the Green been defined on the basis of a detailed character 2. Mortlake, Barnes and Dukes Meadow appraisal which has taken into account factors such as visual analysis, built form, landscape and 3. Chiswick, Hammersmith and Londsdale Road vegetation, the channel edge, river structures, the 4. Fulham Reach and Barn Elms character of the public realm, movement and 5. Putney and Fulham Palace cultural and historical associations. 6. Wandsworth and Sands End Each character reach comprises areas of similar 7. Chelsea and Battersea character and includes land from both the north and 8. Nine Elms south sides of the River. This section considers each of the character reaches in turn and examines how the historical development of each character reach has helped to determine its visual and cultural associations. The key issues and opportunities for enhancement of the River and riverside environment are highlighted in each character reach. This division of the River into sections and also the chosen boundaries between sections are artificial - the River is, of course, one and the sections merge into each other - but it provides a useful study tool. 4.2 Part 4 : Character Reach No.1 CHARACTER REACH NO.1 : KEW AND STRAND ON THE GREEN River Chart Name: Mortlake Reach Strand on the Green and Kew Railway Bridge 4.3 Thames Strategy - Kew to Chelsea Key Characteristics This character reach marks the start of the study Grove Park Duke’s Meadow Kew Riverside area and the gateway to the Royal Botanic Key Railway Hartington Wooded Kew Public Chiswick Mortlake Gardens in Kew.
    [Show full text]