Master of Forestry, Final Thesis Report Christian Scriba

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Master of Forestry, Final Thesis Report Christian Scriba Master of Forestry, Final Thesis Report Christian Scriba A comparison between the forestry sector in New Brunswick (Canada) and Hesse (Germany) by Christian Scriba Previous Degrees (B.Sc. Forestry and Environment, University of Freiburg, 2018; B.Sc. Biology, Philipps-University Marburg, 2014) A Report Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degrees of: Master of Forestry, in the Graduate Academic Unit of Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick and Master of Science, Forest Sciences, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg Supervisors: Brigitte Leblon, PhD, Faculty of Forestry & Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick Marc Hanewinkel, PhD, Chair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg This report is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK July 2020 ©Christian Scriba, 2020 Abstract This report provides an in-depth comparison of forestry and forests in the province of New Brunswick (Canada) and the state of Hesse (Germany). The first two sections describe the general situation and circumstances of forests and forestry in New Brunswick and Hesse, respectively, and the third section aims to compare the two forestry sectors to each other in more detail. The comparison shows several significant differences between the two forestry sectors in regard to forest management, forest governance, and factors influencing the economics of the respective forestry sectors. However, often it was not possible to find directly comparable data for Hesse and New Brunswick, which has several reasons. Therefore, the comparisons made in this report are of a relative nature, to see how much of an impact the forestry sector has on the economy and the people living in New Brunswick and Hesse. ii Acknowledgments At this point, I would like to thank all those who supported and motivated me during the preparation of this master thesis. First, I would like to thank my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Brigitte Leblon (University of New Brunswick), for offering me the topic of the master thesis, supporting me, giving me advice, and grading my thesis. Furthermore, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Marc Hanewinkel (Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg) for agreeing to be my second supervisor and for giving me advice. Furthermore, I would like to thank Mr. Mark Legere from Forest NB for providing me with the Economic Impacts of the New Brunswick Forest Sector report. In addition, thanks go to my fellow students, friends, and family for their encouragement and support. iii Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments .................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................ vii List of Figures ......................................................................................................... viii List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................. ix 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 2. The Forestry Sector in New Brunswick ................................................................. 4 2.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Forest Types and Tree Species ............................................................................ 8 2.3. Forest Ownership .............................................................................................. 12 2.4. Forest Governance, Management Legislation and Regulations ....................... 15 2.4.1. Provincial (Crown Forests) ......................................................................... 15 2.4.2. Private Woodlots ........................................................................................ 18 2.4.3. Industrial Freeholds ................................................................................... 21 2.4.4. Federal Land ............................................................................................... 22 2.5. Timber Processing Legislation and Regulations ................................................ 22 2.6. Forest Certification ............................................................................................ 24 2.7. Economic Impact of the Forestry Sector ........................................................... 25 iv 2.8. Forest Product Markets and Issues ................................................................... 28 2.9. First Nations and Aboriginal Harvesting Agreements ....................................... 31 2.10. Implications of Climate Change and Other Disturbances ................................. 32 3. The Forestry Sector in Hesse ............................................................................. 35 3.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 35 3.2. Forests and Tree Species ................................................................................... 39 3.3. Forest Ownership .............................................................................................. 44 3.4. Forest Governance, Management Legislation and Regulations ....................... 48 3.4.1. Federal Forest Act ...................................................................................... 49 3.4.2. Hessian Forest Act ...................................................................................... 50 3.4.3. State Forest Administration ....................................................................... 53 3.4.4. State Forest Enterprise HessenForst .......................................................... 54 3.5. Timber Processing Legislation and Regulations ................................................ 56 3.6. Forest Functions ................................................................................................ 56 3.7. Forest Certification ............................................................................................ 57 3.8. Economic Impact of the Forestry Sector in Hesse ............................................ 59 3.9. Forest Product Markets and Issues ................................................................... 63 3.10. Disturbances and Climate Change Implications ................................................ 65 v 4. Comparison between the NB and Hesse Forestry Sectors .................................. 69 4.1. Introduction and General Findings .................................................................... 69 4.2. Societal Differences, Uses, Values and Forest Functions .................................. 72 4.3. Forest Ownership, Related Responsibilities and Issues .................................... 81 4.4. Forest Management .......................................................................................... 84 4.5. Forest Governance and Regulations ................................................................. 88 4.6. Economic impact of the forestry sector ............................................................ 94 4.7. Market situation ................................................................................................ 99 5. Conclusions..................................................................................................... 103 References ............................................................................................................ 110 Curriculum Vitae .......................................................................................................... vi List of Tables Table 1 General data about the forestry sector in New Brunswick and Canada…. 5 Table 2 Main tree species in New Brunswick……………………..…………………………. 9 Table 3 Forest ownership in Canada and New Brunswick……………………..………. 12 Table 4 Crown timber licenses and licensees in New Brunswick …………….…….. 17 Table 5 Economic impacts of the New Brunswick forestry sector…………………. 28 Table 6 Current U.S. anti-dumping and countervailing duty rates…………….…… 31 Table 7 General data about the forestry sector in Hesse and Germany…………. 36 Table 8 Tree species in Hesse and Germany ………………………………….……………… 41 Table 9 Forest ownership types and distribution in Germany and Hesse………. 45 Table 10 Forest certification in Hesse ………………………………………….…………………. 58 Table 11 Employment and gross value-added data in Hesse for the 2009-2016 period……………………………………………………………………………… 60 Table 12 Forestry and timber cluster data in Hesse for the 2016 year…………….. 62 Table 13 Comparison between New Brunswick, Hesse, Canada, and Germany for various area and population statistics…………………………………………. 70 Table 14 Share of forest ownership types in % of the total forest area……..……. 81 Table 15 Diameter classes and measurements for different tree species in Hesse ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 85 Table 16 Forest ownership and crown timber licenses of J.D. Irving Ltd……….... 93 Table 17 Forestry and timber cluster data for the 2016 year in Hesse…….….…… 95 Table 18 New Brunswick forestry sector economic impacts in 2016…………….…. 96 Table 19 Employment comparison for the forestry sector in Hesse and New Brunswick…………………………………………………………………………………………. 97 vii List of
Recommended publications
  • The Perfect Choice! Salzgitter – Salzgitter – Die Bunte Familienstadt a Town of Striking Variety
    Salzgitter – the perfect choice! Salzgitter – Salzgitter – die bunte Familienstadt a town of striking variety Salzgitter, die viertgrünste Stadt Deutschlands besticht Salzgitter is charmingly located among the Lower Saxon durch das große und naturnahe Freizeitangebot und foothills of the Harz Mountains. The fact that the town’s 31 freundliches Wohnen im Grünen. Die vielen Bürgerfeste, districts are surrounded by forests and fields means that Open Airs im Schloss Salder, aber auch die mittelalterli- nature is only ever a stone’s throw away. chen Märkte auf den Burgen Lichtenberg und Gebhards- hagen machen die Stadt so Lebens- und Liebenswert. Lake Salzgitter ranks as one of the town’s biggest attrac- tions, and has earned a reputation as the region’s premier Der Salzgitter See mit der Wasserskianlage, dem Piraten- water sports destination. It is located right next to the cen- spielplatz, der Eishalle und vielen weiteren kostenlosen tre of Lebenstedt – a large, modern district connected to Sporteinrichtungen ist das Aushängeschild in der Region the historic spa town of Salzgitter-Bad by the walker and und liegt in unmittelbarer Nähe des Stadtzentrums Le- cyclist-friendly Salzgitter Höhenzug Hills. Salzgitter-Bad is benstedt. Auch die kostenlosen Kindergärten sind einzig- the town’s second-largest district and greets visitors with artig in der Region und unterstreichen besonders die Fa- an enchanting collection of half-timbered buildings. Its milienfreundlichkeit. Der moderne Stadtteil Lebenstedt many smaller, village-like neighbourhoods also play an wird über den Lichtenberger Höhenzug, der zum Wan- important role in lending the town a special charm. dern und Mountenbiken einlädt, mit dem historischen Salzgitter Bad verbunden.
    [Show full text]
  • For People and Forests
    North Rhine-Westphalia 37 % Structure and tasks of the State 11 % Enterprise for Forestry and Timber 16 % 20 % North Rhine-Westphalia 16 % Münsterland Ostwestfalen- The State Enterprise for Forestry and Timber North Rhine- Lippe Westphalia consists of 14 Regional Forestry Offices, the Eifel National Park Forestry Office and the Training and Test Forestry Office in Arnsberg. The forest wardens in a Niederrhein Hoch- sauerland total of 300 forest districts ensure that there is a state- Märkisches Sauerland wide presence. The State Enterprise for Forestry and Timber North Rhine- Westphalia’s main tasks are to sustainably maintain and develop the roles that forests play, to manage the state Imprint Eifel Bergisches Forestry and Timber Land Siegen- Tree species forest and to provide forestry services – e.g. assisting Wittgenstein North Rhine-Westphalia Spruce forest owners in the management of their forests. Published by Pine State Enterprise for Forestry and Timber North Rhine-Westphalia For people and forests Percentage of forest (%) Oak Other tasks include forest supervision (right of access, Public Relations Section 10-20 40-50 Beech Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 50b forest transformation, fire protection, etc.), the implemen- 20-30 50-70 other 59759 Arnsberg Hardwood tation of forestry and forest-based programmes (e.g. with 30-40 E-Mail: [email protected] a view to promoting the energetic and non-energetic use Telephone: +49 251 91797-0 of wood) and the education of the public about the mani- www.wald-und-holz.nrw.de Forest and tree species distribution fold and – above all – elementary significance of the forest www.facebook.com/menschwald in North Rhine-Westphalia to the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R
    STUDIA FORESTALIA SUECICA NR 39 1966 Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. An Analysis of Soviet Competitive Potentialities Skogsekonomi i Sovjet~rnionen rned en unalys av landets potentiella konkurrenskraft by KARL VIICTOR ALGTTERE SICOGSH~GSICOLAN ROYAL COLLEGE OF FORESTRY STOCKHOLM Lord Keynes on the role of the economist: "He must study the present in the light of the past for the purpose of the future." Printed in Sweden by ESSELTE AB STOCKHOLM Foreword Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. is a special study of the forestry sector of the Soviet economy. As such it makes a further contribution to the studies undertaken in recent years to elucidate the means and ends in Soviet planning; also it attempts to assess the competitive potentialities of the U.S.S.R. in international trade. Soviet studies now command a very great interest and are being undertaken at some twenty universities and research institutes mainly in the United States, the United Kingdoin and the German Federal Republic. However, it would seem that the study of the development of the forestry sector has riot received the detailed attention given to other fields. In any case, there have not been any analytical studies published to date elucidating fully the connection between forestry and the forest industries and the integration of both in the economy as a whole. Studies of specific sections have appeared from time to time, but I have no knowledge of any previous study which gives a complete picture of the Soviet forest economy and which could faci- litate the marketing policies of the western world, being undertaken at any university or college.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing for Regional Convergence of Agricultural Land Prices
    SiAg-Working Paper 20 (2017) Testing for Regional Convergence of Agricultural Land Prices Xinyue Yang, Matthias Ritter, and Martin Odening Herausgeber: DFG-Forschergruppe 986, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Philippstr. 13, Haus 12, D-10099 Berlin https://www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/en/institut-en/departments/daoe/siag2010-2013 Redaktion: Tel.: +49 (30) 2093 46325, E-Mail: [email protected] Mai 2004); HU Berlin SiAg-Working Paper 20 (2017) Testing for Regional Convergence of Agricultural Land Prices Xinyue Yang, Matthias Ritter, and Martin Odening Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin January 2017 Abstract The focus of this paper is on spatial market integration in agricultural land markets. We scrutinize the applicability of the law of one price to land markets and distinguish between absolute and relative versions of this “law”. Panel data unit root and stationarity tests are applied to land sale prices in the German state Lower Saxony. Three main clusters with different price developments are detected. Our results indicate that the law of one price holds only locally due to structural differences among regions. Keywords: Agricultural land market; law of one price; spatial price convergence SiAg-Working Paper 20 (2017); HU Berlin ii Xinyue Yang, Matthias Ritter, and Martin Odening Table of contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Ownership in Germany
    16.11.2015 AGDW- Federation of German Forest Owner Associations Forest Ownership in Germany total forested area 11,4 mio ha 32 % of total land state forest private 33 % forest 48 % communal forest 19 % 1 16.11.2015 Average Size of Private Ownership 2 Mio private owners 5,48 Mio hectres av. size < 5 ha Who are the private forest owners? < 20 ha 50 % urban owners, small scale farmers, private persons, clerus 20 - 50 ha 11 % mid sacale farmers, private persons, clerus 13% 50 - 100 ha 7 % 6% large farmers, noble families, private persons, clerus 8% 50% 100 - 200 ha 6 % 6% noble families, private persons, entrepreneurs, trusts 7% 200 - 500 ha 8 % 11% noble families, private persons, entrepreneurs, trusts 500 - 1000 ha 6 % noble families, private persons, entrepreneurs, trusts > 1000 ha 13 % noble families, private persons, entrepreneurs, trusts Source: BWI 3 2012 2 16.11.2015 History of Forest Producer Organizations in Germany 1879 – 1917 first grass root forest owner associations „Vereinigung Mitteldeutscher Waldbesitzer“ 1918 establishment of regional forest owner associations reason: fear of expropriation by left wing government 1918 „Bayerischer Waldbesitzerverband WBV 1918“ 1919 foundation of umbrella organization „Reichsverband dt. Waldbesitzerverbände“ 1934 dissolution of all free organizations or inclusion in Nazi organization „Reichsnährstand“ 1945/48 dissolution of all Nazi organizations by Allies WW II 1946/47 reestablishment of regional forest owner associations 1948 foundation of umbrella organization „Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher
    [Show full text]
  • Torben Hansen Promotion of Forest Owner Cooperatives in Lithuania
    Promotion of forest owner cooperatives in Lithuania – Policy strategies to facilitate sustainable forest management Torben Hansen Supervisors: Vilis Brukas Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Master Thesis no. 207 Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre Alnarp 2013 Promotion of forest owner cooperatives in Lithuania – Policy strategies to facilitate sustainable forest management Torben Hansen Supervisors: Vilis Brukas Examiner: Mattias Boman Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Master Thesis no. 207 Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre Alnarp 2013 MSc Thesis in Forest Management – Euroforester Master Program, 30 ECTS, Advanced level (A2E), SLU course code EX0630 Abstract Forest owner cooperatives are often regarded as a policy vehicle to improve the management of private forests and facilitate entrepreneurship in the forest sector. This can be especially important for countries with economies in transition and recently restored private forest ownership. This study provides decision support and policy recommendations for the promotion of forest owner cooperatives in Lithuania. General characteristics of forest owner cooperatives and cooperative entrepreneurship are portrayed as well as the situation in private forestry in Lithuania. International case studies on forest owner cooperatives and public policies in their regard serve to derive elements and aspects of cooperation that are applicable elsewhere as well as concrete policy recommendations for the case of Lithuania. A variety of different entrepreneurial approaches of existing forest owner cooperatives is found to be applicable to Lithuania as well as different policy measures to promote them. Preferably a policy framework consisting of a complementary mixture of public services and financial support should be chosen for the Lithuanian case and implemented with sufficient financial and personnel capacity in order to achieve an effective policy impact.
    [Show full text]
  • The Way to Your Holiday the Map for Lower Saxony
    The way to your holiday The map for Lower Saxony towns o er concentrated health expertise and outstanding spa and wellness services. Pictures (from top left to bottom right) Culture and history in Lower Saxony But Lower Saxony o ers more than just varied Sales Desk Polen / Znajkraj, www.znajkraj.pl Welcome to the holiday destination Towns in Lower Saxony - Experience, learn, be amazed natural landscapes - our towns are also rich in Blickfang / fotolia.de services and attractions. Historic half-timbered towns Verlag grünes herz® Lower Saxony! - As varied as the landscape UNESCO World Heritage Sites, museums, events, like Celle, Hamelin and Goslar, and medieval towns HMTG / Hassan Mahramzadeh ARochau / fotolia.de From the sea to the mountains, Lower Saxony‘s A city trip in Lower Saxony means sightseeing, customs and bizarre traditions - Lower Saxony has like Lüneburg and Brunswick, stand shoulder to ftlaudgirl / fotolia.de holiday regions o er more variety in a small area shopping, indulgence and excitement. Every plenty to o er for a very varied holiday. In the state‘s shoulder with modern cities and attractive trade fair dieter76 / fotolia.de than almost anywhere else in Europe. Northern town in Lower Saxony is individual with its own many museums, visitors can learn all about the locations like Hannover, Wolfsburg and Osnabrück. Emsland Touristik GmbH Germany‘s largest state stretches from the fl at charm. On a tour of discovery through Lower history of Lower Saxony and its people. Go on the trail Lüneburger Heide GmbH For families, Lower Saxony is a holiday destination micromonkey / fotolia.de North Sea coast with its unmistakeable seven Saxony‘s towns, you can discover designer outlets of the Pied Piper, gain an insight into an East Frisian that o ers a huge range of services for young East Frisian Islands and the Wadden Sea UNESCO and unique boutiques in the city centres or visit tea ceremony or explore art exhibitions and galleries.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Territorial Grids
    BETTER POLICIES FOR BETTER LIVES DES POLITIQUES MEILLEURES POUR UNE VIE MEILLEURE OECD Territorial grids August 2021 OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities Contact: [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Territorial level classification ...................................................................................................................... 3 Map sources ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Map symbols ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Disclaimers .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Australia / Australie ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Austria / Autriche ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium / Belgique ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in Biomass Yield Development of Early, Medium, and Late Maize Varieties During the 21St Century in Northern Germany Jan F Degener* and Martin Kappas
    Degener and Kappas Environmental Sciences Europe (2015) 27:10 DOI 10.1186/s12302-015-0042-9 RESEARCH Open Access Differences in biomass yield development of early, medium, and late maize varieties during the 21st century in Northern Germany Jan F Degener* and Martin Kappas Abstract Background: Though there exists a general notion on how maize yields might develop throughout Europe during the current century, modeling approaches on a regional level that account for small-scale variations are not yet universally available. Furthermore, many studies only refer to one variety of maize. However, the few studies that include at least two varieties indicate that the respective choice will play a major role in how the yields will develop under a changing climate throughout the 21st century. This study will evaluate how far this choice of variety will affect future yields, identify the main factors to explain potential differences, and determine the magnitude of spatial variability. Results: The results suggest clearly differentiated development paths of all varieties. All varieties show a significant positive trend until the end of the century, though the medium variety also shows a significant decline of 5% during the first 30 years and only a slight recovery towards +5% around the century’s end. The late variety has the clearest and strongest positive trend, with peaks of more than +30% increase of biomass yields and around 25% average increase in the last three decades. The early variety can be seen as in-between, with no negative but also not an as-strong positive development path. All varieties have their strongest increase after the mid of the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • NSA/OF/Ports (Aug.).Pages
    Niedersachsen/Bremen/Hamburg/Ostfriesland Resources Introduction to Lower Saxony, Bremen & Hamburg Wikipedia states in regard to the regions of this modern German Bundesland: “Lower Saxony has clear regional divisions that manifest themselves both geographically as well as historically and culturally. In the regions that used to be independent, especially the heartlands of the former states of Brunswick, Hanover, Oldenburg and Schaumburg- Lippe, there is a marked local regional awareness. By contrast, the areas surrounding the Hanseatic cities of Bremen and Hamburg are much more oriented towards those centres.” A number of the Map Guides to German Parish Registers will need to be used to find your town if you are studying this region, among them numbers 4 (Oldenburg), 10 (Hessen-Nassau), 27 (Brunswick), 30-32 (Hannover), 39 (Westphalia & Schaumburg- Lippe) Online (a sampling) Niedersächsische Landesarchiv — http://aidaonline.niedersachsen.de Oldenburg emigrants — http://www.auswanderer-oldenburg.de Ahnenforschung.org “Regional Research” — http://forum.genealogy.net Hamburg Gen. Soc. — http://www.genealogy.net/vereine/GGHH/ Osnabrück Genealogical Society (German) — http://www.osfa.de Bremen’s “Mouse” Gen. Soc. (German) — http://www.die-maus-bremen.de/index.php Mailing Lists (for all German regions, plus German-speaking areas in Europe) -- http://list.genealogy.net/mm/listinfo/ Periodicals IGS/German-American Genealogy: “Niedersachsen Research,” by Eliz. Sharp (1990) “Niedersächsische Auswanderer in den U.S.A.” (Spr’98) “Researching Church
    [Show full text]
  • Private Forest Ownership in Europe
    UNECE United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations GENEVA TIMBER AND FOREST STUDY PAPER 26 PRIVATE FOREST OWNERSHIP IN EUROPE Franz Schmithüsen and Franziska Hirsch UNITED NATIONS ECE/TIM/SP/26 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations UNECE Forestry and Timber Section, Geneva, Switzerland GENEVA TIMBER AND FOREST STUDY PAPER 26 PRIVATE FOREST OWNERSHIP IN EUROPE Franz Schmithüsen and Franziska Hirsch UNITED NATIONS Geneva, 2010 Note The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Abstract More than half of Europe’s forests, not including Russia and other CIS countries, are privately owned. Private owners play a key role in sustaining forest ecosystems, enhancing rural development and supplying resources to markets. Nevertheless, a significant lack of knowledge remains on private forest ownership in Europe. A joint enquiry was conducted during 2006-2007 by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE, now Forest Europe) and the Confederation of European Forest Owners (CEPF) in an attempt to contribute to closing this knowledge gap. A questionnaire was addressed to 38 MCPFE member countries with records of private forestry. Twenty-three countries participated through submitting national reports, mostly for the year 2005: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Vision Germany
    www.oeko.de t Forest Vision Germany Description of methodology, assumptions Berlin, 26 February, 2018 and results Commissioned by Greenpeace Authors Office Freiburg Postfach 17 71 79017 Freiburg Dr. Hannes Böttcher Physical Address Dr. Klaus Hennenberg Merzhauser Straße 173 Christian Winger 79100 Freiburg Öko-Institut e.V. Telefon +49 761 45295-0 Office Berlin Schicklerstraße 5-7 10179 Berlin Telefon +49 30 405085-0 Office Darmstadt Rheinstraße 95 64295 Darmstadt Telefon +49 6151 8191-0 [email protected] www.oeko.de Scenario development, characterisation of different options for forest management and the analysis of BWI data for the selection of areas excluded from wood production was carried out in cooperation with the Naturwald Akademie. Chapter 3 (Scenario development) includes content by: · Dr. Torsten Welle, Naturwald Akademie · Knut Sturm, Naturwald Akademie · Yvonne Bohr, Naturwald Akademie Forest Vision Germany Table of contents Summary 5 Introduction 5 Methods 5 Scenarios 6 Results and discussion 7 Conclusions 10 1. Introduction 11 2. Methods 16 2.1. Model description 16 2.2. Input data for modelling 17 2.3. Characterisation of model indicators 18 2.3.1. Growing stock and increment 18 2.3.2. CO2 sequestration 19 2.3.3. Stand structure and large trees 19 2.3.4. Deadwood stock 20 2.3.5. Growing stock available for wood supply and harvested wood products 20 2.4. Representation of forest management in the model 20 2.4.1. Forest restructuring 21 2.4.2. Management intensity 21 2.4.3. Areas excluded from wood extraction 22 3. Scenario development 23 3.1. Base Scenario 23 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]