DOCSLIB.ORG

Private Forest Ownership in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Private Forest Ownership in Europe UNECE United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations GENEVA TIMBER AND FOREST STUDY PAPER 26 PRIVATE FOREST OWNERSHIP IN EUROPE Franz Schmithüsen and Franziska Hirsch UNITED NATIONS ECE/TIM/SP/26 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations UNECE Forestry and Timber Section, Geneva, Switzerland GENEVA TIMBER AND FOREST STUDY PAPER 26 PRIVATE FOREST OWNERSHIP IN EUROPE Franz Schmithüsen and Franziska Hirsch UNITED NATIONS Geneva, 2010 Note The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Abstract More than half of Europe’s forests, not including Russia and other CIS countries, are privately owned. Private owners play a key role in sustaining forest ecosystems, enhancing rural development and supplying resources to markets. Nevertheless, a significant lack of knowledge remains on private forest ownership in Europe. A joint enquiry was conducted during 2006-2007 by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE, now Forest Europe) and the Confederation of European Forest Owners (CEPF) in an attempt to contribute to closing this knowledge gap. A questionnaire was addressed to 38 MCPFE member countries with records of private forestry. Twenty-three countries participated through submitting national reports, mostly for the year 2005: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. This study paper presents the main findings from the national country reports and draws conclusions on the state of private forestry in Europe in terms of ownership distribution, holding structure, socio-economic findings and trends, with regard to restitution/privatization, changes of ownership patterns and association of private forest owners. Keywords Forest ownership; private forest sector; wood resources; sustainable forest management; data base, empirical enquiry. ECE/TIM/SP/26 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E. 09.XX.X.XX ISBN XXX-XX-X-XXXXX-X ISSN 1020 2269 Private Forest Ownership in Europe __________________________________________________________ iii Preface UNECE, together with FAO, through its integrated programme of work on timber and forestry, works to strengthen the forest sector and its contribution to sustainable development. This is also done through data collection and analysis, which contributes to better knowledge of the forest sector within the UNECE region. This study sheds light on private forestlands in Europe, which are of crucial importance in the region. Forest owners play a key role in sustaining forest ecosystems and enhancing rural development while also providing an economic and industrial resource of primary importance in the UNECE region. Nevertheless, a significant lack of knowledge on forest ownership in Europe remains. A joint enquiry by UNECE/FAO, the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE) and the Confederation of European Forest Owners (CEPF) contributed to closing this knowledge gap. This study presents the main findings from the national reports and draws conclusions on the state of private forest ownership in Europe, in terms of ownership distribution, structure of holdings, socioeconomic findings and overall trends, with regard to restitution/privatization, changes of ownership patterns and associations of private forest owners. The publication informs policy makers about the socioeconomic realities linked to private forest ownership, including the objectives and motivations of private forest owners. Important and changing trends, such as forest land fragmentation, ownership transfer from public to private, owner demographics and socioeconomic situation, and many other changes, are identified throughout the publication. Monitoring changes in this area is particularly important in view of the increasing need to reach out to private forest owners who control such a significant portion of Europe’s forests. This has become increasingly important in view of the bioenergy policies which are reshaping the forest sector and require the mobilization of additional resources, in particular from the often under-utilized private forests. The identification by this report of best practices/examples contributes to informing Governments and policy makers of possible courses of action. With this publication, UNECE, with FAO and its other partners, continues to contribute to sustainable forest management in the region by providing relevant and objective data and analysis. Jan Kubis Executive Secretary UN Economic Commission for Europe iv __________________________________________________________ Private Forest Ownership in Europe Acknowledgements The secretariat wishes to expresses its appreciation to the authors of this study paper, Prof. Dr. Franz Schmithüsen, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, and Franziska Hirsch, responsible for forest policies and institutions at the UNECE/FAO Forestry and Timber Section. While UNECE/FAO took the lead in conducting the enquiry and the establishment of a dataset on private forest ownership in Europe, both authors worked together in analysing the data gathered and their findings provide the basis for this study. The secretariat wishes to thank Alexander Korotkov and Matthias Wilnhammer for the preparation and initial conduct of the private forest ownership study. Helena Guarin and Richard Slaby provided invaluable support in the validation of the data and the preparation of the private forest ownership database, available on the UNECE/FAO website (http://www.unece.org/trade/timber/fra/PFO.htm). Matthias Wilnhammer is owed special thanks for the production of the graphics in this paper, and for the production of the initial data tables. The authors wish to thank Kit Prins, former Chief, UNECE/FAO Forestry and Timber Section, Virginia Cram-Martos, Director, UNECE Trade and Timber Division, as well as Atilla Lengyel and Morton Thoroe, Confederation of European Private Forest Owners (CEPF) for their review and excellent comments which helped improve the paper. They also thank Matthew Fonseca for his work on the editing and layout. The secretariat also wishes to thank the national country correspondents for the submission of completed national reports, often completed in cooperation with counterparts in the country and in correspondence with the secretariat. Without the dedication of the national correspondents, this study would not have been possible. The secretariat would also like to state its appreciation for the contribution of its partners in the preparation of the questionnaire on private forest ownership in Europe. Valuable comments on the draft enquiry were provided by CEPF, the European Landowner’s Organization, the Fédération européenne des communes forestières (FECOF), European Landowners’ Organisation (ELO), the European Forest Institute (EFI) and the Joint UNECE/FAO Working Party on Forest Economics and Statistics, which reviewed the draft enquiry during its twenty-eighth session and endorsed its distribution. Special thanks for review and the provision of valuable suggestions which led to improvements of the paper is owed to Simon Gillam (UK), Florian Borlea (Romania) and Florian Steierer (University of Hamburg and UNECE/FAO). Private Forest Ownership in Europe ___________________________________________________________v C O N T E N T S Page Preface ...................................................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. iv 1. CONTEXT AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT............................................................ 1 1.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project development .........................................................................................................1 1.3 Participation by countries ................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Data availability................................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Database and results ......................................................................................................... 4 2. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 5 2.1 Ownership categories by area and management Status................................................ 5 2.2 Size classes and ownership categories of private forests............................................ 10 2.3 Growing stock, increment, annual fellings and certified area..................................... 19 2.4 Economic indicators of forest production................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For People and Forests
    North Rhine-Westphalia 37 % Structure and tasks of the State 11 % Enterprise for Forestry and Timber 16 % 20 % North Rhine-Westphalia 16 % Münsterland Ostwestfalen- The State Enterprise for Forestry and Timber North Rhine- Lippe Westphalia consists of 14 Regional Forestry Offices, the Eifel National Park Forestry Office and the Training and Test Forestry Office in Arnsberg. The forest wardens in a Niederrhein Hoch- sauerland total of 300 forest districts ensure that there is a state- Märkisches Sauerland wide presence. The State Enterprise for Forestry and Timber North Rhine- Westphalia’s main tasks are to sustainably maintain and develop the roles that forests play, to manage the state Imprint Eifel Bergisches Forestry and Timber Land Siegen- Tree species forest and to provide forestry services – e.g. assisting Wittgenstein North Rhine-Westphalia Spruce forest owners in the management of their forests. Published by Pine State Enterprise for Forestry and Timber North Rhine-Westphalia For people and forests Percentage of forest (%) Oak Other tasks include forest supervision (right of access, Public Relations Section 10-20 40-50 Beech Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 50b forest transformation, fire protection, etc.), the implemen- 20-30 50-70 other 59759 Arnsberg Hardwood tation of forestry and forest-based programmes (e.g. with 30-40 E-Mail: [email protected] a view to promoting the energetic and non-energetic use Telephone: +49 251 91797-0 of wood) and the education of the public about the mani- www.wald-und-holz.nrw.de Forest and tree species distribution fold and – above all – elementary significance of the forest www.facebook.com/menschwald in North Rhine-Westphalia to the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R
    STUDIA FORESTALIA SUECICA NR 39 1966 Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. An Analysis of Soviet Competitive Potentialities Skogsekonomi i Sovjet~rnionen rned en unalys av landets potentiella konkurrenskraft by KARL VIICTOR ALGTTERE SICOGSH~GSICOLAN ROYAL COLLEGE OF FORESTRY STOCKHOLM Lord Keynes on the role of the economist: "He must study the present in the light of the past for the purpose of the future." Printed in Sweden by ESSELTE AB STOCKHOLM Foreword Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. is a special study of the forestry sector of the Soviet economy. As such it makes a further contribution to the studies undertaken in recent years to elucidate the means and ends in Soviet planning; also it attempts to assess the competitive potentialities of the U.S.S.R. in international trade. Soviet studies now command a very great interest and are being undertaken at some twenty universities and research institutes mainly in the United States, the United Kingdoin and the German Federal Republic. However, it would seem that the study of the development of the forestry sector has riot received the detailed attention given to other fields. In any case, there have not been any analytical studies published to date elucidating fully the connection between forestry and the forest industries and the integration of both in the economy as a whole. Studies of specific sections have appeared from time to time, but I have no knowledge of any previous study which gives a complete picture of the Soviet forest economy and which could faci- litate the marketing policies of the western world, being undertaken at any university or college.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Ownership in Germany
    16.11.2015 AGDW- Federation of German Forest Owner Associations Forest Ownership in Germany total forested area 11,4 mio ha 32 % of total land state forest private 33 % forest 48 % communal forest 19 % 1 16.11.2015 Average Size of Private Ownership 2 Mio private owners 5,48 Mio hectres av. size < 5 ha Who are the private forest owners? < 20 ha 50 % urban owners, small scale farmers, private persons, clerus 20 - 50 ha 11 % mid sacale farmers, private persons, clerus 13% 50 - 100 ha 7 % 6% large farmers, noble families, private persons, clerus 8% 50% 100 - 200 ha 6 % 6% noble families, private persons, entrepreneurs, trusts 7% 200 - 500 ha 8 % 11% noble families, private persons, entrepreneurs, trusts 500 - 1000 ha 6 % noble families, private persons, entrepreneurs, trusts > 1000 ha 13 % noble families, private persons, entrepreneurs, trusts Source: BWI 3 2012 2 16.11.2015 History of Forest Producer Organizations in Germany 1879 – 1917 first grass root forest owner associations „Vereinigung Mitteldeutscher Waldbesitzer“ 1918 establishment of regional forest owner associations reason: fear of expropriation by left wing government 1918 „Bayerischer Waldbesitzerverband WBV 1918“ 1919 foundation of umbrella organization „Reichsverband dt. Waldbesitzerverbände“ 1934 dissolution of all free organizations or inclusion in Nazi organization „Reichsnährstand“ 1945/48 dissolution of all Nazi organizations by Allies WW II 1946/47 reestablishment of regional forest owner associations 1948 foundation of umbrella organization „Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher
    [Show full text]
  • Torben Hansen Promotion of Forest Owner Cooperatives in Lithuania
    Promotion of forest owner cooperatives in Lithuania – Policy strategies to facilitate sustainable forest management Torben Hansen Supervisors: Vilis Brukas Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Master Thesis no. 207 Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre Alnarp 2013 Promotion of forest owner cooperatives in Lithuania – Policy strategies to facilitate sustainable forest management Torben Hansen Supervisors: Vilis Brukas Examiner: Mattias Boman Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Master Thesis no. 207 Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre Alnarp 2013 MSc Thesis in Forest Management – Euroforester Master Program, 30 ECTS, Advanced level (A2E), SLU course code EX0630 Abstract Forest owner cooperatives are often regarded as a policy vehicle to improve the management of private forests and facilitate entrepreneurship in the forest sector. This can be especially important for countries with economies in transition and recently restored private forest ownership. This study provides decision support and policy recommendations for the promotion of forest owner cooperatives in Lithuania. General characteristics of forest owner cooperatives and cooperative entrepreneurship are portrayed as well as the situation in private forestry in Lithuania. International case studies on forest owner cooperatives and public policies in their regard serve to derive elements and aspects of cooperation that are applicable elsewhere as well as concrete policy recommendations for the case of Lithuania. A variety of different entrepreneurial approaches of existing forest owner cooperatives is found to be applicable to Lithuania as well as different policy measures to promote them. Preferably a policy framework consisting of a complementary mixture of public services and financial support should be chosen for the Lithuanian case and implemented with sufficient financial and personnel capacity in order to achieve an effective policy impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Vision Germany
    www.oeko.de t Forest Vision Germany Description of methodology, assumptions Berlin, 26 February, 2018 and results Commissioned by Greenpeace Authors Office Freiburg Postfach 17 71 79017 Freiburg Dr. Hannes Böttcher Physical Address Dr. Klaus Hennenberg Merzhauser Straße 173 Christian Winger 79100 Freiburg Öko-Institut e.V. Telefon +49 761 45295-0 Office Berlin Schicklerstraße 5-7 10179 Berlin Telefon +49 30 405085-0 Office Darmstadt Rheinstraße 95 64295 Darmstadt Telefon +49 6151 8191-0 [email protected] www.oeko.de Scenario development, characterisation of different options for forest management and the analysis of BWI data for the selection of areas excluded from wood production was carried out in cooperation with the Naturwald Akademie. Chapter 3 (Scenario development) includes content by: · Dr. Torsten Welle, Naturwald Akademie · Knut Sturm, Naturwald Akademie · Yvonne Bohr, Naturwald Akademie Forest Vision Germany Table of contents Summary 5 Introduction 5 Methods 5 Scenarios 6 Results and discussion 7 Conclusions 10 1. Introduction 11 2. Methods 16 2.1. Model description 16 2.2. Input data for modelling 17 2.3. Characterisation of model indicators 18 2.3.1. Growing stock and increment 18 2.3.2. CO2 sequestration 19 2.3.3. Stand structure and large trees 19 2.3.4. Deadwood stock 20 2.3.5. Growing stock available for wood supply and harvested wood products 20 2.4. Representation of forest management in the model 20 2.4.1. Forest restructuring 21 2.4.2. Management intensity 21 2.4.3. Areas excluded from wood extraction 22 3. Scenario development 23 3.1. Base Scenario 23 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mölder a (2016). Small Forest Parcels, Management Diversity
    Research Article ii FF o o r r e e s s t t doi: 10.3832/ifor1834-009 Biogeosciences and Forestry Vol. 9, pp. 518-528 IUFRO division 8.02 – Mendel University Brno (Czech Republic) 2015 “Coppice forests: past, present and future” Editors: Tomas Vrska, Renzo Motta, Alex Mosseler Small forest parcels, management diversity and valuable coppice habitats: an 18th century political compromise in the Osnabrück region (NW Germany) and its long-lasting legacy Andreas Mölder This study underlines the often under-estimated importance of forest owner- ship and land tenure in European forest biodiversity studies which are crucial for the management, structure, and tree species composition of woodland. In particular it is assumed that, in regions with both state-owned forests and smaller private forests, the latter contain more relict habitats shaped by his- torical woodland management practices. A government decree of 1721, a poli- tical compromise, was crucial to the present-day woodland ownership pattern and distribution of woodland habitats in the Osnabrück region (northwest Ger- many). It resulted in the privatization of woodlands held in common for cen- turies and created a huge number of small, private forest parcels in the 18th century. These developments are discussed in relation to Europe-wide pro- cesses in forest affairs. Mainly due to the low economic importance of these forest parcels, as well as the individualism of the forest owners, coppice struc- tures providing valuable habitats have persisted until today. For instance, over-aged coppice stands provide important habitat conditions for saproxylic species and unique herbaceous layers. These valuable habitats must be pro- tected while creating new coppice stands to eventually take their place in future decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Country Report
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 2010 COUNTRY REPORT GERMANY FRA2010/076 Rome, 2010 The Forest Resources Assessment Programme Sustainably managed forests have multiple environmental and socio-economic functions important at the global, national and local scales, and play a vital part in sustainable development. Reliable and up-to-date information on the state of forest resources - not only on area and area change, but also on such variables as growing stock, wood and non-wood products, carbon, protected areas, use of forests for recreation and other services, biological diversity and forests’ contribution to national economies - is crucial to support decision-making for policies and programmes in forestry and sustainable development at all levels. FAO, at the request of its member countries, regularly monitors the world’s forests and their management and uses through the Forest Resources Assessment Programme. This country report forms part of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 (FRA 2010). The reporting framework for FRA 2010 is based on the thematic elements of sustainable forest management acknowledged in intergovernmental forest-related fora and includes variables related to the extent, condition, uses and values of forest resources, as well as the policy, legal and institutional framework related to forests. More information on the FRA 2010 process and the results - including all the country reports - is available on the FRA Web site (www.fao.org/forestry/fra
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Workshop Inside the Two German Csas Bavaria
    STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPS INSIDE THE TWO GERMAN CSAS BAVARIA BRANDENBURG Nataly Juerges, UGOE Max Krott, UGOE Peter Biber, TUM Werner Poschenrieder, TUM Fabian Schwaiger, TUM Marcus Kühling, GFA Porto 12/06/2018 The project leading to this application has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 676754. Who are the stakeholders helping to organize the workshop? Bavaria: CSA Augsburg Western Forests • Regional Department of Food Agriculture and Forestry Augsburg (AELF) • German Forestry Association (DFV) Brandenburg: CSA Lieberose-Schlaubetal-Neuzelle • Brandenburg Ministry for Rural DevelopmentEnvironment and Agriculture (MLUL) • State Forest Service Brandenburg • Eberswalde Forestry State Center of Excellence (LFE) • German Forestry Association (DFV) 6/12/2018 2 How do the aFMMS link to the interests of these stakeholders? • Engaged stakeholders are interested in providing relevant information within forest policy processes • Presented aFMMS link to ongoing forest policy conflicts about forest management in the CSAs What power resources do these stakeholders have to push the application of ALTERFOR research results through in practice? Engaged stakeholder Power resources Regional Department of Food Agriculture and Provider of (dominant) information (e.g. extension Forestry Augsburg (AELF) service for private forest owners, website, public relations work, responsibilities of public administration: monitoring activities, contact persons for financial support of forest
    [Show full text]
  • State of Forests of the Caucasus and Central Asia
    State of Forests of the Caucasus and Central Asia State of Forests of the Caucasus and Central Asia GENEVA TIMBER AND FOREST STUDY PAPER Overview of forests and sustainable forest management in the Caucasus and Central Asia region New York and Geneva, 2019 2 State of Forests of the Caucasus and Central Asia COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright© 2019 United Nations and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. All rights reserved worldwide. The designations employed in UNECE and FAO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal status of any country; area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in this study and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and its publication does not constitute an endorsement by UNECE or FAO of the opinions expressed. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply their endorsement by UNECE or FAO, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. This work is copublished by the United Nations (UNECE) and FAO. ABSTRACT The study on the state of forests in the Caucasus and Central Asia aims to present the forest resources and the forest sector of the region, including trends in, and pressures on the resource, to describe the policies and institutions for the forest sector in the region and to list the major challenges the sector faces, and the policy responses in place or planned.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Conservation Policy
    FOREST CONSERVATION POLICY A Reference Handbook V. Alaric Sample and Antony S. Cheng CONTEMPORARY WORLD ISSUES Santa Barbara, California • Denver, Colorado • Oxford, England FOREST CONSERVATION POLICY A Reference Handbook Books in the Contemporary World Issues series address vital issues in today’s society such as terrorism, sexual harassment, homelessness, AIDS, gambling, animal rights, and air pollution. Written by professional writers, scholars, and nonacademic experts, these books are authoritative, clearly written, up-to- date, and objective. They provide a good starting point for research by high school and college students, scholars, and general readers as well as by legislators, businesspeople, activists, and others. Each book, carefully organized and easy to use, contains an overview of the subject; a detailed chronology; biographical sketches; facts and data and/or documents and other primary- source material; a directory of organizations and agencies; annotated lists of print and nonprint resources; a glossary; and an index. Readers of books in the Contemporary World Issues series will find the information they need in order to better understand the social, political, environmental, and economic issues facing the world today. Other Titles in ABC-CLIO’s CONTEMPORARY WORLD ISSUES Series American Homelessness, Third Edition, Mary Ellen Hombs Capital Punishment, Second Edition, Michael Kronenwetter Environmental Activism, Jacqueline Vaughn Switzer Families in America, Jeffrey Scott Turner Forest Fires, Phillip N. Omi Freshwater Issues, Zachary A. Smith and Grenetta Thomassey Nuclear Weapons and Nonproliferation, Sarah J. Diehl and James Clay Moltz Ocean Politics and Policy, Peter Jacques and Zachary A. Smith Police Misconduct in America, Dean J. Champion Rainforests of the World, Second Edition, Kathlyn Gay Religion and Politics, Glenn H.
    [Show full text]
  • Master of Forestry, Final Thesis Report Christian Scriba
    Master of Forestry, Final Thesis Report Christian Scriba A comparison between the forestry sector in New Brunswick (Canada) and Hesse (Germany) by Christian Scriba Previous Degrees (B.Sc. Forestry and Environment, University of Freiburg, 2018; B.Sc. Biology, Philipps-University Marburg, 2014) A Report Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degrees of: Master of Forestry, in the Graduate Academic Unit of Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick and Master of Science, Forest Sciences, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg Supervisors: Brigitte Leblon, PhD, Faculty of Forestry & Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick Marc Hanewinkel, PhD, Chair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg This report is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK July 2020 ©Christian Scriba, 2020 Abstract This report provides an in-depth comparison of forestry and forests in the province of New Brunswick (Canada) and the state of Hesse (Germany). The first two sections describe the general situation and circumstances of forests and forestry in New Brunswick and Hesse, respectively, and the third section aims to compare the two forestry sectors to each other in more detail. The comparison shows several significant differences between the two forestry sectors in regard to forest management, forest governance, and factors influencing the economics of the respective forestry sectors. However, often it was not possible to find directly comparable data for Hesse and New Brunswick, which has several reasons. Therefore, the comparisons made in this report are of a relative nature, to see how much of an impact the forestry sector has on the economy and the people living in New Brunswick and Hesse.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro
    UNECE United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations GENEVA TIMBER AND FOREST DISCUSSION PAPER 40 Forest and Forest Products Country Profile: Serbia and Montenegro By Mr. Branko Glavonjic, Ph.D. Mr. Dusan Jovic, B.Sc. Mr. Aleksandar Vasiljevic, B.Sc. Mr. Ranko Kankaras, B.Sc. UNITED NATIONS ECE/TIM/DP/40 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations UNECE Timber Branch, Geneva, Switzerland GENEVA TIMBER AND FOREST DISCUSSION PAPER 40 Forest and Forest Products Country Profile: Serbia and Montenegro By Mr. Branko Glavonjic, Ph.D. Mr. Dusan Jovic, B.Sc. Mr. Aleksandar Vasiljevic, B.Sc. Mr. Ranko Kankaras, B.Sc. UNITED NATIONS Geneva, 2005 Note The statements made in the articles are those of their authors and do not necessarily correspond to those of the secretariat or the official views of the author’s home countries. Furthermore the designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Abstract “Forest and Forest Products Country Profile: Serbia and Montenegro”, a UNECE/FAO Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Paper, presents status and trends of the forest resource, the wood processing industry, trade, consumption and prices of forest products as well as forest sector policy and institutions in Serbia and Montenegro. It includes an outlook for the forest sector in Serbia and Montenegro, and offers some forest products market information for neighbouring Croatia, Slovenia and The Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia.
    [Show full text]