DOCSLIB.ORG

Reviewing the British English (Bre) and American English (Ame) Dialects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reviewing the British English (Bre) and American English (Ame) Dialects REVIEWING THE BRITISH ENGLISH (BRE) AND AMERICAN ENGLISH (AME) DIALECTS I Wy Dirgeyasa [email protected] State University of Medan, Indonesia ABSTRACT Of the many different dialects of English such as British English (hereafter BrE), American English (hereafter AmE), Australian English (AsE), or Canadian English (CnE) or even Singaporean English (hereafter Singlish), etc, the most common widely use across the globe are BrE and AmE. The two dialects of English, as a matter of fact, are dominantly used in any kinds of fields to mention a few such as politics, economics, diplomatic relationship, medical, information communication and technology (ICT), and education as well. The debate about the use of BrE and AmE often centers on education especially in the process of learning and acquiring the English itself because the two dialects of English provide some different and distinctive features. Because of their differences and distinctive features, the learners often find difficulties and often make them confused which one to use. This paper is attempting to review the unique features of BrE and AmE focusing on the spellings. Keywords: British English (BrE); American English (AmE); Dialects INTRODUCTION fall has been used since the sixteenth Historically, from its root in the small century as a variant for the word autumn. colonies of the New World (the origin of the And it is still used in the United States until America state), beginning with Jamestown, now even though it has become uncommon Virginia in the early 17th century (1607), in the United Kingdom. was the rise of the varieties of English (BrE It is generally known that American and AmE). Since then, the American English English is also innovative, especially in its has become the most of mother-tongue words. Americanism, as words and varieties of English. Over the years, English meanings originating in American English spoken in the United States and in England are called, has enriched every facet of the started diverging from each other in various vocabulary and many of them have spread aspects such as spelling, lexis, to use in English worldwide. Sometimes the pronunciation, grammat-ical pattern and so settlers in the American colonies took old forth. This finally led two dialects in the form words and used them in new senses. The of the American English and British English word corn, for instance originally meant In some ways, the differences between the grain in general, and in England, often the two are not only in terms of pronunciation wheat in particular. American applied it to and grammar particularly but also in maize instead. Another example showing vocabulary. American English is that BrE is different from AmE is the word conservative, for example having preserved creek. The word creek in England refers to features from British. For example, the word an inlet or bay from the sea but in America, LANGUAGE CIRCLE Journal of Language and Literature Vol. IX/2 April 2015 | 105 it was used for a small stream (Webster, spelling to be typical American English 1996); (Hornby, 1973). spelling for reasons both philological and American also invented the new words nationalistic. He launched and proposed which are out of old elements, as Thomas many spelling changes in AmE. In terms of Jefferson did in coining belittle, a term that spelling, the majority of spelling differences might just as well have originated in between AmE and Br falls into two England. Garrymander, on the other hand, categories. The first category is Latin- arouse out of a particular event in the derived spelling and the second is Greek- political history of Massachusetts, and so it derived spelling. became the characteristics of American The Latin-derived spelling of AmE falls English. The history then noted that the into many form and patterns. There are a most famous and successful of all American number of Latin-derived spellings of AmE. invention is the expression OK. OK is a They vary in many different forms. First, (- word has pervaded not only other varieties our) is in BrE and (-or) is in AmE.These of English but many foreign languages as most words end in unstressed-our in BrE well. Despites effort to relate OK to several (e.g. colour, flavour, harbour, humour, other languages, including African ones, its labour, neighbour, rumouretc) end in -or in history as chronicled by Allen Walker Read AmE (e.g. color, flavor, harbor, humor, shows it is to be a native invention. The term labor, neighbor, rumor etc). was coined in a Boston newspaper in 1839 Second, (-re) is in BrE and (–er) is in as an abbreviation of the comic misspelling AmE. Actually in British English (BrE), some ollkorrect and was subsequently words are derived from French, Latin or popularized as the name of a political Greek end with a consonant followed by (– supporting President Martin Van Buren, who re), with the (–re) unstressed. In American was nicknamed Old Kinderhook from his English (AmE), most of these words have birth place (Webster, 1996); (Salim, 2006). the ending (–er). However, the differences are most common for words ending (–breor DESCRIPTION –tre). British spellings (e.g. calibre, centre, As stated previously, this paper is litre, manoeuvre, metre, nitre, reconnoitre, attempting to review the unique different saltpetre, spectre, theatere, etc) become features of BrE and AmE in terms of the (e.g. caliber, center, liter, manoeuver, meter, spelling and the tense aspects. These two niter, reconnoiter, saltpeter, specter, theater, aspects seemingly dominant showing their etc). However, most English words that uniqueness. In the real teaching and today either BrE or AmE use (–er) such as learning process the two aspects often chapter, disaster, enter, filter, letter, make confused and tend to disturb the minister, monster, oyster, parameter, process of communication either in the form powder, proper, sober, tender, etc of spoken and written. (Longman, 1982); (Webster, 1996). By history, Webster, one of the most In addition, still many words have (–er) proponent American linguists with his in BrE. These includes Germanic words like famous dictionary entitled Webster‘s New anger, mother, timber and water and Roman World College Dictionary firstly published in words like danger, quarter, and river. Then, 1988 proposed and reformed English then ending (–acre), such as in acre, lucre, 106 | LANGUAGE CIRCLE Journal of Language and Literature Vol. IX/2 April 2015 massacre, and mediocre are used both in also influenced and enriched by Greek BrE and AmE to show that the /c/ is language. Unlike BrE, spelling uses (– pronounced /k/ rather than /s/. Then, the iseize) in (-isation), the American spelling spelling ogre and euchre are also the same uses (–ize) in (-ization). The Greek-derived both in BrE and AmE. spelling of AmE falls into some forms and Third, (-ce) is in BrE and (–se) is in patterns such as( –ize, -yze, -og)etc. AmE. For the word advice/advise and First, (-ise) is in BrE and (-ize) is in device/devise, the BrE and AmE both keep AmE. In general, American spelling system the noun/verb distinction (where the avoid – ise ending in words like organize, pronunciation is -[s] for the noun and -[z] for realize, recognize, etc. While BrE tends to the verb). For the words like licence/license use both (–ize) and (-ise) (organise/ or practice/practise, BrE also keeps the organize, realise/realize, recognise/ noun/verb distinction (the two words in each recognize) etc.The (–ize) ending is actually pair are homophones with -[s], though). On used world-widely in scientific writing and other hand, AmE uses license orpractise for many international organization such as the both noun/verb (with -[s] pronunciation in International Organization for Standarization both case too. (IOS) and World Health Organization Also, the AmE has kept the Anglo- (WHO). However, The Cambridge University French spelling for defense and offense, Press, on the other hand, has long preferred which are usually defence and offence in to using (–ise) and many reference works, BrE. Likewise, there are the American including the Pocket Flower‘s Modern pretense and British pretence; but English Usage. Perhaps it is as a reaction to derivatives such as defensive, offensive, the ascendancy of American spelling. As and pretension are always, they are spelled mentioned previously, the (–ise) is more in both system. commonly used in UK mass media and Fourth, (-xion vs –action).It seems that newspaper like The Times, The Daily the use of the spelling connexion is now rare Telegraph, and the Economist. However in everyday British usage and it is not used (-ize) is also used in many British-based at all in the United States. The word academic publications as shown by Nature, connection has become the standard the Biochemical Journal, and The Time worldwide. Historically, according to the Literary Supplement. Oxford English Dictionary, the older spelling Second,(-yze)is in BrEand(-yse)is in is more etymologically conservative, since AmE. It is found that the ending (-yse) is the original Latin word had (–xio-). While British but –(zye) is in AmE. These two the American usage come from Webster, endings can be found in the world like who abandoned (–xion) in favour of (– analyse, catalyse, hydrolyse, andparalyse in action) by analogy with verb like the word BrE whereas like analyze, catalyze, connect. On the other hand, the word hydrolyze, and paralyze. Dating back to 17th complexion which comes from the word century and 18th century English, the word complex is standard worldwide but analyse was commonly used but many of complection is rare in use. the great dictionaries of that time such as The second is Greek-derived spellings. John Kersey‘s of 1702, Nathan Bailey‘s of It is a fact that American spelling system is 1721 and Samuel Johnson‘s of 1775 LANGUAGE CIRCLE Journal of Language and Literature Vol.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Origins of NZ English
    Origins of NZ English There are three basic theories about the origins of New Zealand English, each with minor variants. Although they are usually presented as alternative theories, they are not necessarily incompatible. The theories are: • New Zealand English is a version of 19th century Cockney (lower-class London) speech; • New Zealand English is a version of Australian English; • New Zealand English developed independently from all other varieties from the mixture of accents and dialects that the Anglophone settlers in New Zealand brought with them. New Zealand as Cockney The idea that New Zealand English is Cockney English derives from the perceptions of English people. People not themselves from London hear some of the same pronunciations in New Zealand that they hear from lower-class Londoners. In particular, some of the vowel sounds are similar. So the vowel sound in a word like pat in both lower-class London English and in New Zealand English makes that word sound like pet to other English people. There is a joke in England that sex is what Londoners get their coal in. That is, the London pronunciation of sacks sounds like sex to other English people. The same joke would work with New Zealanders (and also with South Africans and with Australians, until very recently). Similarly, English people from outside London perceive both the London and the New Zealand versions of the word tie to be like their toy. But while there are undoubted similarities between lower-class London English and New Zealand (and South African and Australian) varieties of English, they are by no means identical.
    [Show full text]
  • LANGUAGE VARIETY in ENGLAND 1 ♦ Language Variety in England
    LANGUAGE VARIETY IN ENGLAND 1 ♦ Language Variety in England One thing that is important to very many English people is where they are from. For many of us, whatever happens to us in later life, and however much we move house or travel, the place where we grew up and spent our childhood and adolescence retains a special significance. Of course, this is not true of all of us. More often than in previous generations, families may move around the country, and there are increasing numbers of people who have had a nomadic childhood and are not really ‘from’ anywhere. But for a majority of English people, pride and interest in the area where they grew up is still a reality. The country is full of football supporters whose main concern is for the club of their childhood, even though they may now live hundreds of miles away. Local newspapers criss-cross the country in their thousands on their way to ‘exiles’ who have left their local areas. And at Christmas time the roads and railways are full of people returning to their native heath for the holiday period. Where we are from is thus an important part of our personal identity, and for many of us an important component of this local identity is the way we speak – our accent and dialect. Nearly all of us have regional features in the way we speak English, and are happy that this should be so, although of course there are upper-class people who have regionless accents, as well as people who for some reason wish to conceal their regional origins.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of English and American Studies English Language And
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Jana Krejčířová Australian English Bachelor’s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: PhDr. Kateřina Tomková, Ph. D. 2016 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. …………………………………………….. Author’s signature I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor PhDr. Kateřina Tomková, Ph.D. for her patience and valuable advice. I would also like to thank my partner Martin Burian and my family for their support and understanding. Table of Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 7 1. AUSTRALIA AND ITS HISTORY ................................................................. 10 1.1. Australia before the arrival of the British .................................................... 11 1.1.1. Aboriginal people .............................................................................. 11 1.1.2. First explorers .................................................................................... 14 1.2. Arrival of the British .................................................................................... 14 1.2.1. Convicts ............................................................................................. 15 1.3. Australia in the
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand English
    New Zealand English Štajner, Renata Undergraduate thesis / Završni rad 2011 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences / Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Filozofski fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:005306 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-26 Repository / Repozitorij: FFOS-repository - Repository of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Osijek Sveučilište J.J. Strossmayera u Osijeku Filozofski fakultet Preddiplomski studij Engleskog jezika i književnosti i Njemačkog jezika i književnosti Renata Štajner New Zealand English Završni rad Prof. dr. sc. Mario Brdar Osijek, 2011 0 Summary ....................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................4 1. History and Origin of New Zealand English…………………………………………..5 2. New Zealand English vs. British and American English ………………………….….6 3. New Zealand English vs. Australian English………………………………………….8 4. Distinctive Pronunciation………………………………………………………………9 5. Morphology and Grammar……………………………………………………………11 6. Maori influence……………………………………………………………………….12 6.1.The Maori language……………………………………………………………...12 6.2.Maori Influence on the New Zealand English………………………….………..13 6.3.The
    [Show full text]
  • British Or American English?
    Beteckning Department of Humanities and Social Sciences British or American English? - Attitudes, Awareness and Usage among Pupils in a Secondary School Ann-Kristin Alftberg June 2009 C-essay 15 credits English Linguistics English C Examiner: Gabriella Åhmansson, PhD Supervisor: Tore Nilsson, PhD Abstract The aim of this study is to find out which variety of English pupils in secondary school use, British or American English, if they are aware of their usage, and if there are differences between girls and boys. British English is normally the variety taught in school, but influences of American English due to exposure of different media are strong and have consequently a great impact on Swedish pupils. This study took place in a secondary school, and 33 pupils in grade 9 participated in the investigation. They filled in a questionnaire which investigated vocabulary, attitudes and awareness, and read a list of words out loud. The study showed that the pupils tend to use American English more than British English, in both vocabulary and pronunciation, and that all of the pupils mixed American and British features. A majority of the pupils had a higher preference for American English, particularly the boys, who also seemed to be more aware of which variety they use, and in general more aware of the differences between British and American English. Keywords: British English, American English, vocabulary, pronunciation, attitudes 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • English in South Africa: Effective Communication and the Policy Debate
    ENGLISH IN SOUTH AFRICA: EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION AND THE POLICY DEBATE INAUGURAL LECTURE DELIVERED AT RHODES UNIVERSITY on 19 May 1993 by L.S. WRIGHT BA (Hons) (Rhodes), MA (Warwick), DPhil (Oxon) Director Institute for the Study of English in Africa GRAHAMSTOWN RHODES UNIVERSITY 1993 ENGLISH IN SOUTH AFRICA: EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION AND THE POLICY DEBATE INAUGURAL LECTURE DELIVERED AT RHODES UNIVERSITY on 19 May 1993 by L.S. WRIGHT BA (Hons) (Rhodes), MA (Warwick), DPhil (Oxon) Director Institute for the Study of English in Africa GRAHAMSTOWN RHODES UNIVERSITY 1993 First published in 1993 by Rhodes University Grahamstown South Africa ©PROF LS WRIGHT -1993 Laurence Wright English in South Africa: Effective Communication and the Policy Debate ISBN: 0-620-03155-7 No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. Mr Vice Chancellor, my former teachers, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen: It is a special privilege to be asked to give an inaugural lecture before the University in which my undergraduate days were spent and which holds, as a result, a special place in my affections. At his own "Inaugural Address at Edinburgh" in 1866, Thomas Carlyle observed that "the true University of our days is a Collection of Books".1 This definition - beloved of university library committees worldwide - retains a certain validity even in these days of microfiche and e-mail, but it has never been remotely adequate. John Henry Newman supplied the counterpoise: . no book can convey the special spirit and delicate peculiarities of its subject with that rapidity and certainty which attend on the sympathy of mind with mind, through the eyes, the look, the accent and the manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Vowel Variation Between American English and British English
    International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 9, No. 1; 2019 ISSN 1923-869X E-ISSN 1923-8703 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Vowel Variation Between American English and British English Afzal Khan1 & Soleman Awad Mthkal Alzobidy2 1 Department of English, Alasala University, King Fahad Airport Road, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2 Department of English Language and Translation, College of Sciences and Theoretical Studies, Saudi Electronic University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Afzal Khan, Department of English, Alasala University, King Fahad Airport Road, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: April 17, 2018 Accepted: November 13, 2018 Online Published: December 29, 2018 doi:10.5539/ijel.v9n1p350 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p350 Abstract The English Language, being an international language, is spoken all over the world with many variations. These variations occur primarily due to environmental, cultural and social differences. The main reasons for these variations are intermingling of different races and strata in a society. In this regard prominent differences can be observed at phonological levels. These phonological variations produce different kinds of English, like British and American English. In these two there are differences in intonation, stress pattern, and pronunciation. Although South-Eastern British R.P. is known as Standard English but one cannot deny the existence and value of American English. The study attempts to highlight the vowel variation between British English and American English at phonological level. Keywords: vowel, variations, American English, British English, phonological 1. Introduction Phonological variation results due to variations in dialects. A dialect is a system of speech sufficiently different from other dialects to be seen as different, yet sufficiently the same as other dialects to be seen as a similar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pronunciation of English in South Africa by L.W
    The Pronunciation of English in South Africa by L.W. Lanham, Professor Emeritus, Rhodes University, 1996 Introduction There is no one, typical South African English accent as there is one overall Australian English accent. The variety of accents within the society is in part a consequence of the varied regional origins of groups of native English speakers who came to Africa at different times, and in part a consequence of the variety of mother tongues of the different ethnic groups who today use English so extensively that they must be included in the English-using community. The first truly African, native English accent in South Africa evolved in the speech of the children of the 1820 Settlers who came to the Eastern Cape with parents who spoke many English dialects. The pronunciation features which survive are mainly those from south-east England with distinct Cockney associations. The variables (distinctive features of pronunciation) listed under A below may be attributed to this origin. Under B are listed variables of probable Dutch origin reflecting close association and intermarriage with Dutch inhabitants of the Cape. There was much contact with Xhosa people in that area, but the effect of this was almost entirely confined to the vocabulary. (The English which evolved in the Eastern and Central Cape we refer to as Cape English.) The next large settlement from Britain took place in Natal between 1848 and 1862 giving rise to pronunciation variables pointing more to the Midlands and north of England (List C). The Natal settlers had a strong desire to remain English in every aspect of identity, social life, and behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences Between British and American English Introduction
    Differences between British and American English Introduction British and American English can be differentiated in three ways: o Differences in language use conventions: meaning and spelling of words, grammar and punctuation differences. o Vocabulary: There are a number of important differences, particularly in business terminology. o Differences in the ways of using English dictated by the different cultural values of the two countries. Our clients choose between British or American English, and we then apply the conventions of the version consistently. Differences in language use conventions Here are some of the key differences in language use conventions. 1. Dates. In British English, the standard way of writing dates is to put the day of the month as a figure, then the month (either as a figure or spelled out) and then the year. For example, 19 September 1973 or 19.09.73. The standard way of writing dates in American English is to put the month first (either as a figure or spelled out), then the day of the month, and then the year. For example, September 19th 1973 or 9/19/73. Commas are also frequently inserted after the day of the month in the USA. For example, September 19, 1973. 2. o and ou. In British English, the standard way of writing words that might include either the letter o or the letters ou is to use the ou form. For example, colour, humour, honour, behaviour. The standard way of writing such words in American English is to use only o. For example, color, humor, honor, behavior. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vocabulary of Australian English
    THE VOCABULARY OF AUSTRALIAN ENGLISH Bruce Moore Australian National Dictionary Centre Australian National University The vocabulary of Australian English comes from many sources. This document outlines some of the most important sources of Australian words, and some of the important historical events that have shaped the creation of Australian words. At times, reference is made to the Australian Oxford Dictionary (OUP 1999) edited by Bruce Moore. 1. BORROWINGS FROM AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES ...2 2. ENGLISH FORMATIONS .....................................................................7 3. THE CONVICT ERA ...........................................................................11 4. BRITISH DIALECT .............................................................................15 5. BRITISH SLANG ................................................................................17 6. GOLD .................................................................................................18 7. WARS.................................................................................................21 © Australian National Dictionary Centre Page 1 of 24 1. BORROWINGS FROM AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES In 1770 Captain James Cook was forced to beach the Endeavour for repairs near present-day Cooktown, after the ship had been damaged on reefs. He and Joseph Banks collected a number of Aboriginal words from the local Guugu Yimidhirr people. One of these words was kangaroo, the Guugu Yimidhirr name for the large black or grey kangaroo Macropus
    [Show full text]
  • British and American Pronunciation Snezhina Dimitrova
    British and American Pronunciation Snezhina Dimitrova In 1877, the British philologist Henry Sweet said that within a century “England, America, and Australia will be speaking mutually unintelligible languages owing to their independent changes of pronunciation.” Fortunately, this grim prediction did not come true. Still, more than 300 million people in the world today speak English as their mother tongue, and many differences between varieties of English do exist. But the differences in terms of vocabulary, grammar, or spelling are remarkably small compared with differences of accent. Accent is the term which linguists use when they refer to the pronunciation features typical of people who belong to the same geographical region or social class; speakers’ accents may also reflect their age, sex, level of education, etc. It is difficult to say exactly how many accents of English there are. Even within the United Kingdom, there are accents as varied as Scottish English, Irish English, Welsh English, Cockney, a newly-emerged accent called Estuary English, and many others. But as far as the teaching of English pronunciation to foreign learners is concerned, the choice of a model accent has traditionally been limited to what can be considered the two “standard” accents in Great Britain and the USA. In the United States, this is an accent called General American, or GA. In fact, the label “General American” covers a range of accents which don’t exhibit any Eastern or Southern local colouring. General American is the pronunciation used by the majority of the population of the United States and by most US radio and TV announcers.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article
    World Englishes, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 177–186, 2006. 0883–2919 REVIEW ARTICLE THE COMPARABILITY OF NEW-DIALECT FORMATION AND CREOLE DEVELOPMENT New-Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Peter Trudgill. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2004, viii þ 180 pp. Reviewed by SALIKOKO S. MUFWENE* This is an informative book about the development of colonial English varieties that the author also identifies as ‘‘Southern Hemisphere Englishes’’ (SHEs), spoken in New Zealand, his primary focus, in Australia, which is also very much discussed, in South Africa, and in the Falkland Islands. According to T, they all developed much later than Caribbean and North American Englishes, the other colonial varieties, which receive only occasional comparisons in this volume. T’s main argument is that they all derive most of their structural features, especially phonological (the focus of the book), directly from British English varieties. (Australian English influence on New Zealand English (NZE) is admittedly marginal, although it cannot be completely dismissed.) The process of the formation of SHEs amounts to what is identified in Mufwene (2001) as ‘‘competition and selection,’’ leading to ‘‘restructuring’’ (a phenomenon similar to gene recombination in biology). T acknowledges this process more explicitly toward the end of the book. The phrase ‘‘new-dialect formation’’ in the title, whose apparent interpretation as an outcome of several structural changes becomes clearer only as the book unfolds, should not be interpreted as a kind of change in itself. As the rest of this review shows, it is the end-result of several form- and structure-changing processes that lead to language specia- tion.
    [Show full text]