Amadeo Bordiga and the Myth of Antonio Gramsci

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amadeo Bordiga and the Myth of Antonio Gramsci AMADEO BORDIGA AND THE MYTH OF ANTONIO GRAMSCI John Chiaradia PREFACE A fruitful contribution to the renaissance of Marxism requires a purely historical treatment of the twenties as a period of the revolutionary working class movement which is now entirely closed. This is the only way to make its experiences and lessons properly relevant to the essentially new phase of the present. Gyorgy Lukács, 1967 Marxism has been the greatest fantasy of our century. Leszek Kolakowski When I began this commentary, both the USSR and the PCI (the Italian Communist Party) had disappeared. Basing myself on earlier archival work and supplementary readings, I set out to show that the change signified by the rise of Antonio Gramsci to leadership (1924-1926) had, contrary to nearly all extant commentary on that event, a profoundly negative impact on Italian Communism. As a result and in time, the very essence of the party was drained, and it was derailed from its original intent, namely, that of class revolution. As a consequence of these changes, the party would play an altogether different role from the one it had been intended for. By way of evidence, my intention was to establish two points and draw the connecting straight line. They were: one, developments in the Soviet party; two, the tandem echo in the Italian party led by Gramsci, with the connecting line being the ideology and practices associated at the time with Stalin, which I label Center communism. Hence, from the time of Gramsci’s return from the USSR in 1924, there had been a parental relationship between the two parties. Discussion accompanies the origin and rise of this dependency. One cannot fully understand the history of the PCI, the influence it exerted on Italian politics, and its undramatic and quiet demise without knowledge of this early period. The dissolution of the USSR surprised me, although it should not have. In contrast, the disappearance of the Italian party, if unexpected, was fully in keeping with the changes alluded to below and its subsequent history. Many years ago in the conclusion of an early study of Italian communism, I had written, “When a Western Stalinist party finally breaks down — the PCI in Italy — it remains on the right, never moving to the left, thus disclosing again the nature of its genesis.”[1] One of the most astounding aspects of this story is not the transformation undergone in the mid-1920s, but that in the English- speaking world the change has remained unknown. One may surmise that when faced with the beginning of the total collapse of the “socialist camp” at the end of the 1980s, the Communist leadership found itself confronted by a stark dilemma: either go to the left—a step it could not undertake because of its very nature — and assert its intention of remaining a party of socialism, bringing into play a reconsideration of past policies and history going back to Gramsci and earlier with all the destabilization that might arise as had already happened in the Soviet party, or move “to the right and to the front” and declare its fealty to the 1 bourgeois order, thereby closing off that past and openly acknowledge its own non-socialist allegiance. The leadership chose the latter, and the largest communist party in the West disappeared in the twinkling of an eye. In reality, as in the USSR, programmatically and ideologically the reconciliation with capitalism had been building within the party for decades. Meanwhile, I had to react to the appearance of a number of new studies and a conference on Gramsci at Columbia University. The first of the new titles, a work by Donald Sassoon, One Hundred Years of Socialism, the Western European Left in the 20th Century,[2] was brought to my attention by a friend to whom I had given an early manuscript for critical comment. When it became clear that Sassoon knew absolutely nothing about the origins of Italian communism yet continued to repeat the old disinformation about the early years, I found his history the perfect foil for my views. The same may be said for the conference. My knowledge of what transpired there was due also to friends who attended, did not agree with the views expressed, and brought me papers distributed by the discussants. The only speaker who actually centered his comments on “Gramsci and modernity,” the stated theme of the deliberations, was Giancarlo Corsini; that said, I believe that the annual American Halloween fad celebrating vampires does not necessarily imply a significant social influence going back to Bram Stoker’s lively and imaginative writing. My treatment of the conference will clarify this point. As the second millennium approached its own fin de siecle, a cascade of new analytical studies emerged in Italy centering on the political activities of the two major figures of early Italian communism, Amadeo Bordiga and Antonio Gramsci.[3] The significance of these new titles to this writing is that they provided additional reinforcement of my own archival findings from the early 1970s, and further confirmed the assessments already laid down in this commentary. I made liberal use of their new data. To fully understand my argument, let me explain further what I mean by the key term Center communism. I intend a movement that aspires to socialism and comes to power either from a delegation of authority, as happened in Eastern Europe, or after a long, difficult revolutionary struggle, the case with Russia, Yugoslavia, China and other lands of East Asia. More tellingly, these regimes introduced economies based on state-capitalism, transformed the ruling party into an elitist formation served by power and special privileges, and excluded the working population from meaningful empowerment, even as they laid claim to building an existing socialism. By meaningful, I mean the ability to raise, consider, and carry through command decisions by the working class itself. By state-capitalism, I mean the elimination of private ownership of all aspects of productive resources, without the socialist corollary: the laboring class involvement as an expression of mastery in all aspects of the change, and the steps toward the elimination of commodity production. Most importantly of all, that class continued to experience degradation and exploitive alienation, labored and lived in social relations not dissimilar from those of capitalism, and never matured — never was permitted to mature — politically and intellectually into a “ruling class” endowed with the decisive voice, authority and understanding to implement, qua working class, the change of relationships and the assumption of responsibilities that would transform and move itself and society onto a new stage — that of socialism. The absence of private ownership became the fiction concealing the invariant continuity in social relations. Such an undertaking would have to be preceded by an enormous educational effort by the party, a party capable of both leading and following, motivated by a different vision of its role and acceptance of its limits; one that understands socialism to be the handiwork of the many million- numbered working and allied classes, not of the short-lived exiguous party, and responds to the ever changing realities of the class to the point of knowing when its very existence is no longer needed. 2 Therefore, a party not only of democratic incorporation but dedicated also to revolutionary transformation. With the change enacted, both the doctrine and the organization have no further role. Instead, the arrival and formation of a command economy give notice that the socialist transformation has been derailed. In this age of triumphant capitalist elitism one can both not imagine and find unreal the thought of working and lower-class millions involved in the actual common effort of devising and laying out the social relations of a new society; of the common working people bearing up and delivering themselves from the deforming heritage of the old society as they face, in concert with peers, the daunting responsibility of sacrifice, power, decision-making, and error; venturing into social relations never conceived of before; of what this will do to them and to their society, a transformed social surrounding that must come to exclude all relations and transactions of a commercial or monetary nature, including wages, wealth, titles and inheritance. In summary, this would involve the conscious and deliberate construction of an entirely new social order, that, in the end, would be of a sight and scale — internationally, that is — more awing, inspiring, and astonishing than the building of pyramids in that early dawn of antiquity. One might paraphrase and quote here those magnificent lines from Lenin’s State and Revolution, often dismissed as mere utopian babble by the hard, practical men of class society and class restoration. Discussing the Paris Commune and how the society it had briefly given life to was something “qualitatively” different, a democracy “transformed from capitalist democracy into proletarian democracy,” and the state “into something which is no longer the state in the accepted sense of the word,” Lenin continued with the dismantling of the old regime: “The organ of suppression, however, is here the majority of the population[the dictatorship of the proletariat], and not a minority, as was always the case under slavery, serfdom, and wage slavery. And since the majority of people itself suppresses its oppressors, a 'special force' for suppression is no longer necessary! In this sense, the state begins to wither away... [T]he more the discharge of state power devolves upon the people generally, the less need is there for the existence of this power.”[4] In Lenin's lifetime such an implementation was nigh impossible. Never did the opportunity arise during the decades when the “socialist camp” towered on the world scene.
Recommended publications
  • Libertarian Marxism Mao-Spontex Open Marxism Popular Assembly Sovereign Citizen Movement Spontaneism Sui Iuris
    Autonomist Marxist Theory and Practice in the Current Crisis Brian Marks1 University of Arizona School of Geography and Development [email protected] Abstract Autonomist Marxism is a political tendency premised on the autonomy of the proletariat. Working class autonomy is manifested in the self-activity of the working class independent of formal organizations and representations, the multiplicity of forms that struggles take, and the role of class composition in shaping the overall balance of power in capitalist societies, not least in the relationship of class struggles to the character of capitalist crises. Class composition analysis is applied here to narrate the recent history of capitalism leading up to the current crisis, giving particular attention to China and the United States. A global wave of struggles in the mid-2000s was constituitive of the kinds of working class responses to the crisis that unfolded in 2008-10. The circulation of those struggles and resultant trends of recomposition and/or decomposition are argued to be important factors in the balance of political forces across the varied geography of the present crisis. The whirlwind of crises and the autonomist perspective The whirlwind of crises (Marks, 2010) that swept the world in 2008, financial panic upon food crisis upon energy shock upon inflationary spiral, receded temporarily only to surge forward again, leaving us in a turbulent world, full of possibility and peril. Is this the end of Neoliberalism or its retrenchment? A new 1 Published under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works Autonomist Marxist Theory and Practice in the Current Crisis 468 New Deal or a new Great Depression? The end of American hegemony or the rise of an “imperialism with Chinese characteristics?” Or all of those at once? This paper brings the political tendency known as autonomist Marxism (H.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Antonio Gramsci a Torino (1911-1922)
    Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana ISSN: 1315-5216 [email protected] Universidad del Zulia Venezuela Maffia, Gesualdo Antonio Gramsci a Torino (1911-1922) Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, vol. 16, núm. 53, abril-junio, 2011, pp. 95-105 Universidad del Zulia Maracaibo, Venezuela Disponibile in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27919220009 Come citare l'articolo Numero completo Sistema d'Informazione Scientifica Altro articolo Rete di Riviste Scientifiche dell'America Latina, i Caraibi, la Spagna e il Portogallo Home di rivista in redalyc.org Progetto accademico senza scopo di lucro, sviluppato sotto l'open acces initiative Antonio Gramsci in Turin (1911-1922) Gesualdo MAFFIA ipartimen to di Studi Politici, Universidad de Torino, Italia. La ciudad de Torino le ofrece a Antonio The city of Turin offered Antonio Gramsci un ambiente muy fecundo para su for- Gramsci a very fertile environment for his politi- mación política e intelectual, gracias a la presti- cal and intellectual development, thanks to its giosa tradición universitaria y a su rápido desa- prestigious university tradition and rapid indus- rrollo industrial. Gramsci, abandona sus estudios trial development. Gramsci abandonded his uni- universitarios, se dedica al periodismo político, versity studies and dedicated himself to political renovando la difusión del socialismo, ofrece un journalism, renewing the diffusion of socialism, ejemplo de periodismo crítico, atento a los he- offering an example of critical journalism, aware chos y a las contradicciones de la sociedad liberal
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Chapter 1
    Notes Introduction 1. Timothy Campbell, introduction to Bios. Biopolitics and Philosophy by Roberto Esposito (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008), vii. 2. David Graeber, “The Sadness of post- Workerism or Art and Immaterial Labor Conference a Sort of Review,” The Commoner, April 1, 2008, accessed May 22, 2011, http://www.commoner.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/graeber_ sadness.pdf. 3. Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended 1975–1976 (New York: Picador, 2003), 210, 211, 212. 4. Ibid., 213. 5. Racism works for the state as “a break into the domain of life that is under power’s control: the break between what must live and what must die” (ibid., 254). 6. Ibid., 212. 7. Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 219. 8. Ibid., 224. 9. Ibid., 229. 10. See Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998) and State of Exception (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005). 11. Esposito, Bios. Biopolitics and Philosophy, 14, 15. 12. Ibid., 147. 13. Laurent Dubreuil, “Leaving Politics. Bios, Zo¯e¯ Life,” Diacritics 36.2 (2006): 88. 14. Paolo Virno, A Grammar of the Multitude (New York: Semiotext[e], 2004), 81. Chapter 1 1. Catalogo Bolaffi delle Fiat, 1899–1970; repertorio completo della produzione automobilistica Fiat dalle origini ad oggi, ed. Angelo Tito Anselmi (Turin: G. Bolaffi , 1970), 15. 2. Gwyn A. Williams, introduction to The Occupation of the Factories: Italy 1920, by Paolo Spriano (London: Pluto Press, 1975), 9. See also Giorgio Porosini, 174 ● Notes Il capitalismo italiano nella prima guerra mondiale (Florence: La Nuova Italia Editore, 1975), 10–17, and Rosario Romero, Breve storia della grande industria in Italia 1861–1961 (Milan: Il Saggiatore, 1988), 89–97.
    [Show full text]
  • Luigi Longo, Un Segretario Comunista Troppo Dimenticato
    Luigi Longo, un segretario comunista troppo dimenticato Cade in queste settimane il quarantesimo anniversario della morte di Luigi Longo (1900-1980). Dopo essere stato in carcere in Italia e Francia, fu partecipe della guerra civile spagnola nelle Brigate internazionali (1936-1939), poi comandante partigiano delle brigate comuniste con il nome di battaglia “Gallo”, poi ancora segretario del Pci nel periodo 1964-1972 dopo la morte di Palmiro Togliatti e prima dell’elezione di Enrico Berlinguer. In Dialogo sull’antifascismo, il Pci e l’Italia repubblicana (Editori Riuniti university press, 2013) tra Aldo Natoli e Vittorio Foa, il primo riconosce il ruolo che ebbe Longo nel corso dell’invasione della Cecoslovacchia da parte delle truppe del Patto di Varsavia: La posizione di critica netta che Longo fece giustamente, una delle sue iniziative migliori in fondo, e quindi come tale passò nella politica ufficiale del partito, non era per niente condivisa dalla base. Natoli spiega a Foa che Longo ebbe un ruolo decisivo nel prendere le distanze da Mosca nella crisi di Praga del 1968 e nel pubblicare il Memoriale di Yalta, l’ultimo scritto di Palmiro Togliatti alla vigilia della sua morte nell’agosto 1964, dove erano contenuti critici giudizi su Mosca e Pechino, auspicando la ricostruzione dell’unità del movimento comunista internazionale su altre basi. Si deve citare a favore della segreteria di Longo anche l’incontro con gli studenti del ’68 nel maggio di quell’anno nella sede del partito a Botteghe oscure: un gesto positivo di dialogo con il movimento nascente. Fu una scelta su cui insistette proprio Longo, che in un’intervista a Rinascita ne spiegò le motivazioni contro le titubanze di altri dirigenti del partito.
    [Show full text]
  • October 31, 1956 Draft Telegram to Italian Communist Leader Palmiro Togliatti
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified October 31, 1956 Draft telegram to Italian Communist Leader Palmiro Togliatti Citation: “Draft telegram to Italian Communist Leader Palmiro Togliatti,” October 31, 1956, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, TsKhSD, F. 89, Per. 45, Dok. 14 and in The Hungarian Quarterly 34 (Spring 1993), 107.1 http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/111974 Summary: Draft telegram from the CPSU CC to Italian Communist Leader Palmiro Togliatti on the Soviet leadership's position on the situation in Hungary. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation Workers of the World, Unite! Top Secret Communist Party of the Soviet Union CENTRAL COMMITTEE No P 49/69 To Comrade Shepilov (M[inistry] of F[oreign] A[ffairs]) and to Comrade Vinogradov Extract from Minutes No. 49, taken at the October 31, 1956 meeting of the Presidium of the CC Draft of a telegram to be sent to Comrade Togliatti, The CC approves the attached text of a telegram to be sent to Comrade Togliatti in con-nection with the Hungarian situation. Secretary of the CC To Paragraph 69 of Minutes No. 49 Top Secret ROME For Comrade TOGLIATTI In your evaluation of the situation in Hungary and of the tendencies of development of the Hungarian Government toward a reactionary development, we are in agreement with you. According to our information, Nagy is occupying a two-faced position and is falling more and more under the influence of the reactionary forces. For the time being we are not speaking out openly against Nagy, but we will not reconcile ourselves with the turn of events toward a reactionary debaucher Your friendly warnings regarding the possibility of the weakening of the unity of the collective leadership of our party have no basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Disability Question
    Antonio Gramsci's South … or … Some Aspects of the Disability Question WHEN ANTONIO GRAMSCI gave his maiden speech in Parliament in May of 1925, many of the other deputies left their seats and thronged around him in order to hear the faint voice coming from his compressed chest. (In the introduction to one of the editions of Gramsci's Prison Letters he is described as "having the appearance of being a hunchbacked dwarf." A footnote follows, which alas does not explain the difference between appearing to be a hunchbacked dwarf and actually being a hunchbacked dwarf.) The next day, one of the Rome newspapers published a picture of Mussolini, who had also been present that day, leaning forward with his hand cupped behind his ear, a smirk on his face, as if to say: here is the left, embodied in this frail goblin, the crippled left, the left so weak it can barely make itself heard, the pitiable left. ON THE EVENING of November 8, 1926, at 10:30, Antonio Gramsci was arrested in his lodgings on Rome's via Morgagni. Did he hear jack boots on the stairs, fists pounding on the door, those sounds that had not yet become clichés of anti-fascism? Among the papers he left behind was the unfinished essay, "Alcuni temi della questione meridionale," "Some Aspects of the Southern Question," found by Camilla Ravera, one of those women who appear throughout his life, gathering up scattered texts and armloads of laundry, being scolded for purchasing the wrong sorts of undershirts, those women to whom the letters from prison are written (Carissmia mamma, Carissima Tania, Mi carissima Julca, Cara signora), those women who washed his dishes and put his sons to bed.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years of Marxist-Humanism in the U.S
    25 Years of Marxist-Humanism in the U.S. Raya Dunayevskaya Prologue: New stage of production, New stage of cognition, New kind of organization Ever since I began preparing for the celebration of May 5 as the birth-time of history - Marx's new continent of thought - I have been rethinking the birth of Marxist-Humanism in the U.S. There was no way to sum up 25 years of the birth and development of the News and Letters Committees as well as News & Letters as paper, without taking account of the philosophic breakthrough on the Absolute Idea as containing a movement from practice as well as from theory. That occurred in 1953. Once the split in the State- Capitalist Tendency, known as Johnson-Forest,1 was complete in 1955, our very first publication reproduced my May 12-20, 1953 Letters on the Absolute Idea along with the first English translation of Lenin's Philosophic Notebooks. In a word, while 1955 saw the birth of News and Letters, both as Committees and as our paper, 1953 saw at one and the same time, the emergence, in the Johnson-Forest Tendency, of open divergencies towards objective events (be it Stalin's death, the East German revolt, the Beria purge, or McCarthyism), as well as towards the subjective idea of what type of paper Correspondence was to be and what was its relationship to Marxism. * * * In reaching back to 1953, a new illumination disclosed that we were really talking, not about a, single year, but about the period 1949- 1954. After all, nothing short of the Second Industrial Revolution had emerged with the introduction of Automation in the mines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian Communist Party 1921--1964: a Profile
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1966 The Italian Communist Party 1921--1964: A profile. Aldo U. Marchini University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Marchini, Aldo U., "The Italian Communist Party 1921--1964: A profile." (1966). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6438. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6438 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. NOTE TO USERS Page(s) not included in the original manuscript and are unavailable from the author or university. The manuscript was scanned as received. it This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE ITALIAN COkkUNIST PARTY 1921 - 196A: A PROPILE by ALDO U.
    [Show full text]
  • MSI. Il Grande Inganno
    MAURIZIO BAROZZI MSI IL GRANDE INGANNO Genesi e nascita di un partito che ha disatteso gli ideali di coloro che avrebbe dovuto rappresentare, ha stravolto l’immagine del fascismo e in 50 anni di vita ha tradito indipendenza e interessi reali della nazione. Pubblicazione non in commercio - Ottobre 2014 Retrocopertina L' autore, Maurizio Barozzi, è nato a Roma nel 1947. Ricercatore storico, si è sempre dedicato ad accurate inchieste, in particolare quelle relative alle vicende riguardanti gli ultimi giorni e la morte di Mussolini. Collabora con il quotidiano Rinascita, nel quale pubblica articoli di carattere storico e attualità politica, inchieste sulla morte di Mussolini, la strategia della tensione e argomenti vari. Altrii suoi articoli inchiesta su la morte di Mussolini, pubblicati anche nella rivista Storia del Novecento, Storia in Rete e in importanti siti on Line dove qui ha pubblicato anche saggi su le vicende del Carteggio Mussolini/Churchill, e su l’intervento italiano nella seconda guerra mondiale. Coautore del libro Storia della Federazione Nazionale Combattenti della RSI (Ed. Fncrsi 2010). Fncrsi nella quale si onora di aver militato anche se, per ragioni anagrafiche, non come ex combattente. Pubblicazione non in commercio ai soli fini di studio 2 MSI IL GRANDE INGANNO AVVERTENZA GIRANO IN INTERNET ALCUNE VERSIONI DI QUESTO SAGGIO, NON CORRETTE O ADDIRITTURA SPURIE. IL SOLO TESTO DI RIFERIMENTO E’ QUESTO: DATATO OTTOBRE 2014, ESPOSTO NEL SITO DELLA FNCRSI: http://fncrsi.altervista.org/ MAURIZIO BAROZZI Pubblicazione non in commercio ai soli fini di studio 3 INTRODUZIONE Tempo addietro, nel corso di annose ricerche sulla morte di Mussolini, avemmo modo di collaborare, attraverso email, con un importante ricercatore storico con il quale entrammo in confidenza.
    [Show full text]
  • Compagne E Compagni, Come Militante Della Federazione Di Pisa
    Compagne e compagni, come militante della Federazione di Pisa, esprimo una profonda soddisfazione per la qualità complessiva delle tesi congressuali, con le quali viene riposizionata al centro del dibattito la questione comunista, con il fine della costruzione del Partito comunista. Ora come mai l'affermazione “comunismo o barbarie” è dimostrata a livello mondiale dalle politiche inique adottate dal capitalismo per “uscire dalla crisi”. Politiche che immiseriscono le vite di tutte le classi subalterne e gettano il seme di nuove guerre imperialiste. Moltissimi compagni in Italia che hanno smesso di andare a votare, rifiutando questa democrazia vuota nata con il maggioritario, guardano ora al nostro Congresso fondativo con grandi aspettative, così come tutta quell'area di giovani, disoccupati o precari, donne e tutti quei soggetti che non hanno trovato negli ultimi trent'anni un Partito nel quale sentirsi compiutamente rappresentati e che vivono una vita di difficoltà dovuta alle dinamiche del sistema capitalistico. Sentiamo il peso della responsabilità di aver deciso di dar vita al Partito comunista, anche per avere alle nostre spalle una storia complessa fatta di vittorie, di errori e sconfitte. E per tornare a vincere dobbiamo mettere sotto la lente d'ingrandimento la storia del Partito comunista italiano, di cui dobbiamo capire fino in fondo la portata con un'analisi che ci è necessaria per poter conquistare, oggi, una capacità egemonica che ci consenta un'avanzata sociale elevata quanto quella raggiunta in Italia, dal dopoguerra fino al rapimento Moro, grazie al lavoro di quanti si riconoscevano nel Pci. Che ha avuto una fine oscura, troppo rapida e non sufficientemente analizzata.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Bordigist Current”
    THE “BORDIGIST CURRENT” (1919-1999) Italy, France, Belgium Philippe Bourrinet Index Introduction ...........................................................................................................5 1. The origins (1912-1926) ........................................................................................11 2. German Left or Italian Left? ...................................................................................30 3. The Birth of the Left Fraction of the PCI ..............................................................45 1933-39 Bilan. Milestones on the road to defeat 4. The Weight of the Counter-Revolution..................................................................65 5. The War in Spain: No Betrayal! .............................................................................88 6. Towards war or revolution? (1937-39) ..................................................................103 7. Balance sheet of the Russian Revolution...............................................................115 1939-45 Trial by fire 8. The ordeal of war: from fraction to party? ............................................................137 9. The “Partito Comunista Internazionalista” ...........................................................153 Conclusion..........................................................................................................167 Appendix 1 DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES OF THE BELGIAN FRACTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST LEFT...................170 Appendix 2 Manifesto of the Communist Left
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian Communist Party and The
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY The Italian Communist Party and the Hungarian crisis of 1956 History one-year M. A. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Candidate: Aniello Verde Supervisor: Prof. Marsha Siefert Second reader: Prof. Alfred Rieber CEU eTD Collection June 4th, 2012 A. Y. 2011/2012 Budapest, Hungary Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection Acknowledgements I would like to express my frank gratitude to professors Marsha Siefert and Alfred Rieber for their indispensible support, guidance and corrections. Additionally, I would like to thank my Department staff. Particularly, I would like to thank Anikó Molnar for her continuous help and suggestions. CEU eTD Collection III ABSTRACT Despite a vast research about the impact of the Hungarian crisis of 1956 on the legacy of Communism in Italy, the controversial choices of the Italian Communist Party (PCI) have been often considered to be a sort of negative exception in the progressive path of Italian Communism toward modern European socialism. Instead, the main idea of this research is to reconstruct the PCI’s decision-making within the context of the enduring strategic patterns that shaped the political action of the party: can the communist reaction to the impact in Italy of the Hungarian uprising be interpreted as a coherent implication of the communist preexisting and persisting strategy? In order to answer this question, it is necessary to reconstruct how the news coming from Hungary left an imprint on the “permanent interests” of the PCI, and how the communist apparatus reacted to the crisis.
    [Show full text]