DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CONSTRUCTION OF E-60 HIGHWAY SAMTREDIA- GRIGOLETI - SECTION Km 0 - Km11,5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VOLUME II. ANNEXES Project No Road Department Financed by EIB Ministry of Regional Develo-pment and Prepared for Infrastructure KOBA Ltd / TRANSPROJECT Ltd Foundation WEG MAY 2013 1 Contents Annex 1. ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Administrative structure and environmental legislation in georgia .................................. 5 1.1 Administrative Structure ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Legal framework ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Framework Legislation ............................................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 Legislation Related to Environmental Permitting ............................................................. 8 1.2.3 Other Environmental Laws .................................................................................................... 14 1.2.4 International Commitments .................................................................................................. 20 1.2.5 Environmental Standards and Norms ................................................................................ 23 Annex 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 2. Environmental Baseline Reports ............................................................................................. 28 2.1 Climate ........................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2. Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrogeology .................................................................... 34 2.2.1. Geomorphology....................................................................................................................... 34 2.2.2. Geology and Tectonics ......................................................................................................... 39 2.2.3 Seismic Risks ............................................................................................................................ 40 2.2.4 Hydrogeology ............................................................................................................................ 41 2.3. Hydrology ..................................................................................................................................... 45 2.3.1 Brief hydrographic description of the rivers and gullies crossing Samtredia- Grigoleti upgrading road .................................................................................................................. 45 2.4. Ecological Receptors – Landscape and Flora .................................................................... 56 2.4.1 Landscape .............................................................................................................................. 56 2.4.2 Botanical Survey: Flora and Vegetation in the Project Area ...................................... 56 2.5 Zoological Survey Report ..................................................................................................... 71 2.5.1. Landscape (habitats) of the Project area .......................................................................... 74 2.5.2. Ecosystems, species complexes and species in need of conservation crossed by the Samtredia-Grigoleti Highway corridor. ................................................................................. 75 2.5.3. General Characteristics of Animal Species` Composition, According to Taxonomic Groups. ........................................................................................................................... 78 2.5.4. Recommendation and conclusion.................................................................................... 103 2.5.4.1. "Hot spots" –areas requiring special attention ......................................................... 103 2.5.4.2. Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 105 2.5.4.3. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 107 2.5.4.4. Monitoring ........................................................................................................................... 107 2.6. Archaeological Potential of Samtredia-Grigoleti Highway Construction Corridor . 109 Annex 3 ................................................................................................................................................... 112 Analysis Report ................................................................................................................................ 112 Annex 4. .................................................................................................................................................. 125 4. Air pollution and background radiation ............................................................................ 125 4.1 Air Quality: Baseline, Project Impacts and Mitigation ..................................................... 125 4.2. Radiation background ....................................................................................................... 131 Annex 5. ................................................................................................................................................. 132 Noise Factor: Baseline, Project Impacts and Mitigation ....................................................... 132 5.1 Baseline Noise Measurement Data ....................................................................................... 133 5.2 Modeling of Traffic Related Noise ......................................................................................... 134 2 5.3 Modeling of Noise Related to Construction Activities .................................................... 135 5.4 Resume ........................................................................................................................................ 137 Annex 6. .................................................................................................................................................. 139 Procedures for Extraction of Plant Species Included in Red List of Georgia from the Natural Environment and Procedures for Changing Category of Forestry Fund Land 139 Annex 7. .................................................................................................................................................. 145 Waste Management Plan for Construction Camps and Equipment Yards ....................... 145 Annex 8 ................................................................................................................................................... 163 Inert material quarries in the designing territory area ........................................................... 163 Annex 9 ................................................................................................................................................... 170 References ......................................................................................................................................... 170 Annex 10 ................................................................................................................................................. 177 List of Experts tooking part in preparing of EIA ..................................................................... 177 3 ABBRAVIATION AND ACRONYMS BP Bank Procedures CAS Center of Archaeological Search of the Ministry of Culture and Sports CBR Californian Bearing Ratio CPS Country Partnership Strategy CCP Contractor Control Plan CMP Contractor‟s Management Plan EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan ESA Equivalent Standard Axel GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geographical Information Systems GP Good Practices GPS Global Positioning System HEC – RAS Hydrologic Engineering Center – River Analysis System IFI International Financial Institution JBIC Japan Bank for International Cooperation KP Kilometer Point MoE Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources MLHSP Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Protection MoI Ministry of Interior NTRC National Transport Regulatory Commission NSFSVPP The “National Service for the Foodstuffs Safety, Veterinary and Plant Protection” of the Ministry of the Agriculture OP Operational Policy PIU Project Implementation Unit RDMRDI Roads Department of the Ministry of Economic Development RoW Right of Way TEM Trans European Motorway TRRC Transport Reform and Rehabilitation Center USC Unified Soil Classification 4 Annex 1. 1. Administrative structure and environmental legislation in georgia 1.1 Administrative Structure Recent changes in the administrative structure, adopted by the Decree No 93 of the Government of Georgia dated 25.04.2013, resulted in redistribution of responsibilities between the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MoE) and the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources and are reflected in current titles of the mentioned ministries. The MoE is renamed as
Recommended publications
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus

    Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus

    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
  • Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Potentials in Georgia

    Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Potentials in Georgia

    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1(En) ISSN 2070-6065 REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1 (En) REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA by Marina Khavtasi † Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Marina Makarova Head of Division Water Resources Protection Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Irina Lomashvili Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Archil Phartsvania National Consultant Thomas Moth-Poulsen Fishery Officer FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Budapest, Hungary András Woynarovich FAO Consultant FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
  • Chechnya's Status Within the Russian

    Chechnya's Status Within the Russian

    SWP Research Paper Uwe Halbach Chechnya’s Status within the Russian Federation Ramzan Kadyrov’s Private State and Vladimir Putin’s Federal “Power Vertical” Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs SWP Research Paper 2 May 2018 In the run-up to the Russian presidential elections on 18 March 2018, the Kremlin further tightened the federal “vertical of power” that Vladimir Putin has developed since 2000. In the North Caucasus, this above all concerns the republic of Dagestan. Moscow intervened with a powerful purge, replacing the entire political leadership. The situation in Chechnya, which has been ruled by Ramzan Kadyrov since 2007, is conspicuously different. From the early 2000s onwards, President Putin conducted a policy of “Chechenisation” there, delegating the fight against the armed revolt to local security forces. Under Putin’s protection, the republic gained a leadership which is now publicly referred to by Russians as the “Chechen Khanate”, among other similar expressions. Kadyrov’s breadth of power encompasses an independ- ent foreign policy, which is primarily orientated towards the Middle East. Kadyrov emphatically professes that his republic is part of Russia and presents himself as “Putin’s foot soldier”. Yet he has also transformed the federal subject of Chechnya into a private state. The ambiguous relationship between this republic and the central power fundamentally rests on the loyalty pact between Putin and Kadyrov. However, criticism of this arrange- ment can now occasionally be heard even in the Russian president’s inner circles. With regard to Putin’s fourth term, the question arises just how long the pact will last.
  • Background Information on Chechnya

    Background Information on Chechnya

    Background Information on Chechnya A study by Alexander Iskandarian This study was commissioned by UNHCR. The views expressed in this study by the author, Director of the Moscow-based Centre for Studies on the Caucasus, do not necessarily represent those of UNHCR. Moscow, December 2000 1. Background information on Chechnya Under Article 65 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Republic of Chechnya is mentioned as one of the 89 subjects of the Federation. Chechnya officially calls itself the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria. It is situated in the east of the Northern Caucasus, with an area of around 15,100 square kilometres (borders with the Republic of Ingushetia have not been delimited; in the USSR, both republics were part of the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Republic). According to the Russian State Committee on Statistics, as of January 1993, Chechnya had a population of around 1,100,000. There are no reliable data concerning the current population of Chechnya. Chechens are the largest autochthonous nation of the Northern Caucasus. By the last Soviet census of 1989, there were 958,309 Chechens in the USSR, 899,000 of them in the SSR of Russia, including 734,500 in Checheno-Ingushetia and 58,000 in adjacent Dagestan where Chechens live in a compact community.1 The largest Chechen diaspora outside Russia used to be those in Kazakhstan (49,500 people) and Jordan (around 5,000). One can expect the diaspora to have changed dramatically as a result of mass migrations. Chechnya has always had a very high population growth rate, a high birth rate and one of the lowest percentages of city dwellers in Russia.
  • Ancient Glaciation of the Caucasus

    Ancient Glaciation of the Caucasus

    Open Journal of Geology, 2018, 8, 56-64 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg ISSN Online: 2161-7589 ISSN Print: 2161-7570 Ancient Glaciation of the Caucasus Khazaradze Revaz, Kharadze Koba, Tsikarishvili Kukuri, Chartolani Giorgi Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia How to cite this paper: Revaz, K., Koba, Abstract K., Kukuri, T. and Giorgi, C. (2018) An- cient Glaciation of the Caucasus. Open The paper deals with important, different views on the old glaciation of the Journal of Geology, 8, 56-64. Caucasus based on the literary sources and the latest data obtained through https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2018.81004 the expeditions. Our researches are mostly of complex character where petro- Received: December 8, 2017 graphic, palynological and paleontological methods are widely used. The pe- Accepted: January 20, 2018 trographic method allowed us to connect block debris of the moraine with the Published: January 23, 2018 main centers and to determine the directions of the glaciers movement and Copyright © 2018 by authors and their distribution boundaries. The palynological method was used to deter- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. mine the genesis of loose sediments considered as moraines and their sedi- This work is licensed under the Creative mentation conditions. The palynological spectrum of deposits shows that they Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). are river sediments and their sedimentation took place under humid, mod- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ erately warm climate conditions that is not associated with glaciation. Open Access Keywords Petrography, Palynology, Genesis, Sedimentation 1. Introduction The study of the Caucasian Isthmus, from the point of view of paleoglaciation, began in the second part of the XIX century [1].
  • Reserved Domains

    Reserved Domains

    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada greece lesotho norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic grenada liberia oman sudan andorra chad guatemala libya pakistan suriname angola chile guinea liechtenstein palau swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guinea-bissau lithuania palestina sweden argentina colombia guyana luxembourg panama switzerland armenia comoros haiti macau papuanewguinea syria aruba congo honduras macedonia paraguay taiwan australia costarica hongkong madagascar peru tajikistan austria croatia hungary malawi philippines tanzania azerbaijan cuba iceland malaysia poland thailand bahama curacao india maldives portugal timor-leste bahrain cyprus indonesia mali qatar togo bangladesh czechia iran malta romania tonga barbados denmark iraq marshallislands russia trinidadandtobago belarus djibouti ireland mauritania rwanda tunisia belgium dominica israel mauritius saintlucia turkey belize dominicanrepublic italy mexico samoa turkmenistan benin ecuador jamaica micronesia sanmarino tuvalu bhutan egypt japan moldova saudiarabia uganda birma elsalvador jordan monaco senegal ukraine bolivia equatorialguinea kazakhstan mongolia serbia unitedarabemirates bosniaandherzegovina eritrea kenya montenegro seychelles uk botswana estonia kiribati morocco sierraleone england brazil ethiopia northkorea mozambique singapore unitedkingdom brunei fiji korea namibia sintmaarten uruguay bulgaria finland southkorea nauru slovakia uzbekistan burkinafaso
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment

    Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment

    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
  • National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia

    National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia

    National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia 2007 - 2009 FOREWORD This National Report on the State of Environment 2007-2009 has been developed in accordance with the Article 14 of the Law of Georgia on Environmental Protection and the Presidential Decree N 389 of 25 June 1999 on the Rules of Development of National Report on the State of Environment. According to the Georgian legislation, for the purpose of public information the National Report on the State of Environment shall be developed once every three years. 2007-2009 National Report was approved on 9 December 2011. National Report is a summarizing document of all existing information on the state of the environment of Georgia complexly analyzing the state of the environment of Georgia for 2007-2009. The document describes the main directions of environmental policy of the country, presents information on the qualita- tive state of the environment, also presents information on the outcomes of the environmental activities carried out within the frames of international relations, and gives the analysis of environmental impact of different economic sectors. National Report is comprised of 8 Parts and 21 chapters: • Qualitative state of environment (atmospheric air, water resources, land resources, natural disasters, biodiversity, wastes and chemicals, ionizing radiation), • Environmental impact of different economic sectors (agriculture, forestry, transport, industry and en- ergy sector), • Environmental protection management (environmental policy and planning, environmental regula- tion and monitoring, environmental education and awareness raising). In the development of the present State of Environment (SOE) the Ministry of Environment Protection was assisted by the EU funded Project Support to the Improvement of the Environmental Governance in Georgia.
  • Geotechnical Investigation of 16 Towers Along 500 Kv Ksani‐ Stepantsminda Transmission Line in Georgia

    Geotechnical Investigation of 16 Towers Along 500 Kv Ksani‐ Stepantsminda Transmission Line in Georgia

    Geoengineering Ltd. Engineering Survey, Design, Construction Geotechnical Investigation of 16 Towers along 500 kv Ksani‐ Stepantsminda Transmission Line In Georgia Technical Report Tbilisi, Georgia 2016 Geoengineering Ltd. Engineering Survey, Design, Construction Geotechnical Investigation of 16 Towers along 500 kv Ksani‐Stepantsminda Transmission Line In Georgia Technical Report General Director L. Mikaberidze Head of Engineering Surveys Department L. Gorgidze Head of Sector of Engineering‐geological Surveys D. Sirbiladze Head of Geotechnical Laboratory R. Kavelashvili Tbilisi, Georgia 2016 GeoEngineering Engineering Survey, Design, Construction Textual Part Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ................................................................................... 5 3. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 GEOMORPHOLOGICAL AND HYDROGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS ............................................ 9 3.3 GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE ..........................................................................................................
  • Georgia Review Validation of the Country Partnership Validation Strategy Final Review, 2��4–2��8

    Georgia Review Validation of the Country Partnership Validation Strategy Final Review, 24–28

    CPS Final Georgia Review Validation of the Country Partnership Validation Strategy Final Review, 24–28 Independent Evaluation Raising development impact through evaluation Validation Report January 2019 Georgia Validation of the Country Partnership Strategy Final Review, 2014–2018 This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy. Independent Evaluation: VR-31 NOTES (i) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. (ii) For an explanation of rating descriptions used in Asian Development Bank (ADB) evaluation reports, see ADB. 2015. 2015 Guidelines for the Preparation of Country Assistance Program Evaluations and Country Partnership Strategy Final Review Validations. Manila. Director General Marvin Taylor-Dormond, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) Deputy Director General Véronique N. Salze-Lozac'h, IED Director Walter Kolkma, Thematic and Country Division, IED Team leader Ari A. Perdana, Evaluation Specialist, IED Team members Sergio C. Villena, Evaluation Officer, IED Ed Alfred Abrahm M. Alvinez, Evaluation Assistant, IED Christine Grace K. Marvilla, Evaluation Assistant, IED The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department (IED) on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of IED management, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report. In preparing any evaluation report, or by making any designation of or reference
  • Géorgie 44° Oust-Djegouta 44°

    Géorgie 44° Oust-Djegouta 44°

    vers TCHERKESSK 42° vers TCHERKESSK vers BOUDENNOVSK 44° ESSENTOUKI PIATIGORSK GEORGUIEVSK GÉORGIE 44° OUST-DJEGOUTA 44° t TE RRI T O I R E D E S T A V R O P O L u PREGRADNAÏA o a Koura a m R U S S I E 40° É s u R PUBLIQUE DES k o a A lk É a Ï K k o ADYGU S b ZELENTCHOUKSKA A oumo KISLOVODSK Z a dk L o ïa P GÉORGIE a Ï Mer vers TOUAPSÉ TERRITOIRE DE KARATCHA EVSK h c oup vers KIZLIAR Mer KRASNAÏA l ur Caspienne o O POLIANA B lka PROKHLADNY Noire SOTCHI R É P U B L I Q U E D E S Ma lka Ma MOZDOK KRASNODAR a BAKSAN d r m ek e ue Ï T er u R b n heg MA SKI ARMÉNIE AZERBAÏDJAN o Avadkhara e a Tc s T aks P KARATCHA Ï S-TC HERKE SSES B NARTKALA Terek ADLER Lesselidzé MALGOBEK TEREK TURQUIE TEBERDA K U KABARDINO- Gantiadi Bzyb o u NALTCHIK b TYRNYAOUZ INGOUCHIE Gagra a M o n t s Ï n k d u DOMBA re GROZNY B z y b 5642 e KARDJINE S h Elbrous c 4046 T n IRAN ABKHAZIE ou ja GOUDERMES Lychny 2781 C BALKARIE S Pitsounda Mt Dombaï-Oulguen ELBROUS NAZRAN SYRIE IRAQ Akhalcheni vers Goudaouta Kvemo-Ajara S DIGORA ARDON Novy-Afon BESLAN Amtkeli A dori i 46° vers GROZNY Soukhoumi Ko o r 40° o d Mestia 5204 ALAGUIR VLADIKAVKAZ K S Ing h Goulripch M o n t s d u o k k V u a r u É É l A i o I TCH TCH NIE Dranda Khaichi N r É u Capitale d'État Tkvartcheli É Mt Chkhara U u O SS TIE o Mt Laïla T I E O S (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) 4008 5068 DU NORD vers MAKHATCHKALA Plus de 200 000 hab.
  • Environment and Society in the Late Prehistory of Southern Georgia, Caucasus

    Environment and Society in the Late Prehistory of Southern Georgia, Caucasus

    Environment and society in the late prehistory of southern Georgia, Caucasus Connor, S.E. and Sagona, A. This is a draft version of a manuscript published in Les Cultures du Caucase (VIe-IIIe millénaires avant notre ère): leurs relations avec le Proche-Orient (edited by B. Lyonnet, 2007, Editions CNRS, Paris, pp. 21-36). Please note that there may be differences between this version and the final published version. The authors will be happy to provide copies on request. ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIETY IN THE LATE PREHISTORY OF SOUTHERN GEORGIA, CAUCASUS Simon CONNOR and Antonio SAGONA INTRODUCTION Recent investigations into the palaeo-vegetation of southern Georgia, specifically on the Tsalka Plateau, have yielded significant results that help us to understand the environmental context of the late prehistoric societies in southern Caucasus. Despite discussions that have inferred ancient socio- economic developments in the South Caucasus, trustworthy data have been limited. Attempts to provide a holistic picture, using multidisciplinary approaches that integrate the results from various fields, have been even fewer. In this paper we draw together data on the palaeo-vegetation and archaeology of southern Georgia from the Mesolithic until the Middle Bronze Age. The present-day landscapes of southern and eastern Georgia are dominated by steppe vegetation, with only a narrow and fragmented forest-belt that divides lowland and highland steppes (Figs. 1 and 2). Evidence from various quarters has suggested, however, that what are nowadays steppes may have been more wooded in the prehistoric past. This evidence includes forest faunal assemblages from archaeological sites in presently treeless landscapes (1), the presence of relict forest soils in steppe areas (2), remnant dwarf stands of trees on the Javakheti Plateau (3), as well as Bronze Age archaeological finds depicting deer-hunting scenes (4) and historical legends, such as the founding of Tbilisi during a pheasant- or deer-hunt (5).