DOCSLIB.ORG

Doromu-Koki Grammar Sketch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doromu-Koki Grammar Sketch Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages Volume 58 Doromu-Koki Grammar Sketch Robert L. Bradshaw 2012 SIL-PNG Academic Publications Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea Papers in the series Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages express the authors’ knowledge at the time of writing. They normally do not provide a comprehensive treatment of the topic and may contain analyses which will be modified at a later stage. However, given the large number of undescribed languages in Papua New Guinea, SIL-PNG feels that it is appropriate to make these research results available at this time. René van den Berg, Series Editor Copyright © 2012 SIL-PNG Papua New Guinea [email protected] Published 2012 Printed by SIL Printing Press Ukarumpa, Eastern Highlands Province Papua New Guinea ISBN 9980 0 3649 4 Table of Contents List of maps and tables ........................................................................... v Abbreviations ....................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction .................................................................................... 1 1.1 Location and speakers ............................................................. 1 1.2 Language name and dialects .................................................... 4 1.3 Affliation and earlier studies.................................................... 4 1.4 Cultural sketch ........................................................................ 5 1.5 Language vitality................................................................... 12 1.6 Typological features .............................................................. 14 1.7 Acknowledgments ................................................................. 16 2. Phonology ...................................................................................... 17 2.1 Phonemes .............................................................................. 17 2.2 Allophonic rules .................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Voiceless velar plosive backing................................. 20 2.2.2 Mid front vowel raising ............................................. 21 2.2.3 Vowel nasalisation .................................................... 21 2.3 Distribution ........................................................................... 21 2.4 Syllable structure................................................................... 26 2.4.1 One syllable .............................................................. 27 2.4.2 Two syllables ............................................................ 27 2.4.3 Three syllables .......................................................... 28 2.4.4 Four syllables............................................................ 28 2.4.5 Five syllables ............................................................ 29 2.4.6 Six syllables .............................................................. 29 2.5 Vowel sequences ................................................................... 29 2.6 Stress .................................................................................... 33 2.7 Orthography .......................................................................... 33 2.8 Intonation .............................................................................. 34 2.8.1 Statement .................................................................. 34 2.8.2 Incomplete sentence .................................................. 35 2.8.3 Question ................................................................... 35 i ii 2.8.4 Emotion .................................................................... 36 2.8.5 Listing ....................................................................... 36 2.8.6 Calling ...................................................................... 37 2.9 Morphophonemics ................................................................. 38 2.9.1 Vowel epenthesis ...................................................... 38 2.9.2 Vowel raising ............................................................ 38 2.9.3 Approximant epenthesis ............................................ 38 2.9.4 Tap deletion .............................................................. 39 3. Pronouns, nouns and noun phrases .............................................. 41 3.1 Pronouns ............................................................................... 41 3.1.1 Personal .................................................................... 41 3.1.2 Possessive ................................................................. 43 3.1.3 Reflexive ................................................................... 44 3.1.4 Demonstrative ........................................................... 46 3.2 Nouns .................................................................................... 50 3.2.1 Plural nouns .............................................................. 52 3.2.2 Repetition of nouns and pronouns .............................. 54 3.2.3 Compound nouns ...................................................... 56 3.3 Noun phrase .......................................................................... 59 3.3.1 Adjectives and adjective phrase ................................. 60 3.3.2 Colours ..................................................................... 65 3.3.3 Comparison ............................................................... 66 3.3.4 Quantifiers ................................................................ 66 3.3.5 Numbers.................................................................... 69 4. Verbs and verb phrases ................................................................. 74 4.1 Tense-aspect-mood ................................................................ 76 4.1.1 Tense ........................................................................ 77 4.1.2 Aspect ....................................................................... 84 4.1.3 Mood ........................................................................ 86 4.2 Switch reference .................................................................... 94 4.3 Verbs of movement................................................................ 96 4.4 Causative ............................................................................... 98 4.5 Transitiviser......................................................................... 100 4.6 Verb phrase ......................................................................... 100 4.6.1 Serial verb constructions.......................................... 101 4.6.2 Adjunct verb phrases ............................................... 103 iii 4.6.3 Impersonal verb constructions ................................. 108 4.6.4 Adverbs .................................................................. 108 4.7 Nominalisation .................................................................... 112 5. Minor word classes...................................................................... 115 5.1 Particles .............................................................................. 115 5.1.1 Topic marker .......................................................... 115 5.1.2 Affirmative ............................................................. 117 5.1.3 Question words ....................................................... 118 5.1.4 Exclamations .......................................................... 118 5.1.5 Negative ................................................................. 119 5.1.6 Vocative ................................................................. 120 5.2 Conjunctions ....................................................................... 121 6. Clause structure .......................................................................... 122 6.1 Verbal clauses ..................................................................... 122 6.1.1 Postpositions and postpositional phrases ................. 123 6.1.2 Locatives ................................................................ 130 6.1.3 Interrogatives .......................................................... 134 6.1.4 Temporal periphery ................................................. 136 6.2 Non-verbal clauses .............................................................. 142 6.2.1 Equative ................................................................. 142 6.2.2 Descriptive ............................................................. 142 7. Complex sentence structure ........................................................ 144 7.1 Coordination ....................................................................... 144 7.1.1 Temporal/switch reference ...................................... 144 7.1.2 Coordinating conjunctions ...................................... 145 7.2 Subordination ...................................................................... 148 7.2.1 Cause-effect ............................................................ 149 7.2.2 Result-reason .......................................................... 151 7.2.3 Condition-consequence ........................................... 152 7.2.4 Apprehensive .......................................................... 153 7.2.5 Purpose ................................................................... 153 7.3 Direct and indirect speech ................................................... 154 7.4 Relative clauses ................................................................... 156 7.4.1 Restrictive RCs ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Assessment of Language Needs for Technical Communication in a Multilingual Speech Community: Implications for Teaching LSP in Papua New Guinea
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 368 186 FL 021 942 AUTHOR Moody, James TITLE An Assessment of Language Needs for Technical Communication in a Multilingual Speech Community: Implications for Teaching LSP in Papua New Guinea. PUB DATE Apr 93 NOTE 28p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Regional Language Center Seminar (28th, Singapore, April 19-21, 1993). PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) Viewpoints (Opinion/Position Papers, Essays, etc.) (120) Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS College Graduates; *Cultural Pluralism; *Educational Needs; Engineering; English; Foreign Countries; Forestry; Graduate Surveys; Higher Education; *Intercultural Communication; *Language Role; *Languages for Special Purposes; Language Usage; Multilingualism; Needs Assessment; Pidgins; Sciences; Second Language Instruction; Uncommonly Taught Languages; *Work Environment IDENTIFIERS *Papua New Guinea; Papua New Guinea University of Technology; Tok Pisin ABSTRACT A survey of 98 Papua New Guinea technical university graduates in the applied sciences, engineering fields, and forestry investigated their language skill use and language needs in the workplace. Results indicate that, as in Papua New Guinea society in general, English and Tok Pisin are the two most important languages for technical communication in the workplace. Common language use patterns for technical purposes include Tok Pisin used alone, mixed with English, "simplified" English, and formal, technical English. Practical, appropriate syllabuses, materials, and methods for teaching languages for special purposes (LSP) should be developed to accommodate these existing language use patterns. This could be handled by offering courses in language for occupational purposes and language for academic purposes. It would also be desirable to introduce technical language in the student's dominant language, which in this context is often Tok Pisin, for purposes of concept development, then translate the terms into English.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICE MOTU 41 3.1 Introduction 41 3 .2 the Mission Frontier 41 3.3 the Unofficial 'Visitors' Frontier 47 3.4 the Government Frontier 56
    re . I /VA �I (its story) by Tom Dutton The University of Papua New Guinea Press 1985 Published by the University of Papua New Guinea Press Copyright T. E. Dutton 1985 © All right reserved CONTENTS First published 1985 FOREWORD Vll ISBN 9980-84-007-2 PREFACE Vlll Printed in Hong Kong by Colocraft Ltd. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xii A NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY X-lV Cover design by Takus David ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS and OTHER CONVENTIONS xv GLOSSARY XVI Produced within the framework of the Languages for Intercultural Australian Academy of the THE LANGUAGE TODAY Communication in the Pacific Area Project of the 1. Humanities and under the academic auspices of the Union Academique 1.1 Introduction Internationale as publication No. 3 under the Project. 1.2 Distribution and Varieties No royalties are paid on this book. 1.3 General Overview of the Structure of Hiri (formerly Police) Motu 4 1.4 Pidgin Features of Hiri Motu 7 1.4.1 Sounds 7 1.4.2 Grammar 8 1.4.3 Vocabulary 16 2. IN THE BEGINNING: THE PRE-EUROPEAN SETTING 20 2.1 Introduction 20 2.2 The HTL(E) 22 2.3 The HTL(K) 29 2.4 Simplified Motu 36 3. INVASION AND THE NEW FRONTIER: SIMPLIFIED MOTU TO POLICE MOTU 41 3.1 Introduction 41 3 .2 The Mission Frontier 41 3.3 The Unofficial 'Visitors' Frontier 47 3.4 The Government Frontier 56 4. LAW AND ORDER: THE SPREAD OF POLICE MOTU 59 To Corinne, Brett and Anna 4.1 Introduction 59 4.2 MacGregor's Armed Native Constabulary 62 4.3 The Village Constable System 71 4.4 The Prison System 74 4.5 Conclusion 78 ECONOMIC AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT: 5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of Komnzo
    A grammar of Komnzo Christian Döhler language Studies in Diversity Linguistics 22 science press Studies in Diversity Linguistics Editor: Martin Haspelmath In this series: 1. Handschuh, Corinna. A typology of marked-S languages. 2. Rießler, Michael. Adjective attribution. 3. Klamer, Marian (ed.). The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology. 4. Berghäll, Liisa. A grammar of Mauwake (Papua New Guinea). 5. Wilbur, Joshua. A grammar of Pite Saami. 6. Dahl, Östen. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. 7. Schackow, Diana. A grammar of Yakkha. 8. Liljegren, Henrik. A grammar of Palula. 9. Shimelman, Aviva. A grammar of Yauyos Quechua. 10. Rudin, Catherine & Bryan James Gordon (eds.). Advances in the study of Siouan languages and linguistics. 11. Kluge, Angela. A grammar of Papuan Malay. 12. Kieviet, Paulus. A grammar of Rapa Nui. 13. Michaud, Alexis. Tone in Yongning Na: Lexical tones and morphotonology. 14. Enfield, N. J. (ed.). Dependencies in language: On the causal ontology of linguistic systems. 15. Gutman, Ariel. Attributive constructions in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic. 16. Bisang, Walter & Andrej Malchukov (eds.). Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios. 17. Stenzel, Kristine & Bruna Franchetto (eds.). On this and other worlds: Voices from Amazonia. 18. Paggio, Patrizia and Albert Gatt (eds.). The languages of Malta. 19. Seržant, Ilja A. & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.). Diachrony of differential argument marking. 20. Hölzl, Andreas. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective. 21. Riesberg, Sonja, Asako Shiohara & Atsuko Utsumi (eds.). Perspectives on information structure in Austronesian languages. 22. Döhler, Christian. A grammar of Komnzo. ISSN: 2363-5568 A grammar of Komnzo Christian Döhler language science press Döhler, Christian.
    [Show full text]
  • 0=AFRICAN Geosector
    2= AUSTRALASIA geosector Observatoire Linguistique Linguasphere Observatory page 123 2=AUSTRALASIA geosector édition princeps foundation edition DU RÉPERTOIRE DE LA LINGUASPHÈRE 1999-2000 THE LINGUASPHERE REGISTER 1999-2000 publiée en ligne et mise à jour dès novembre 2012 published online & updated from November 2012 This geosector covers 223 sets of languages (1167 outer languages, composed of 2258 inner languages) spoken or formerly spoken by communities in Australasia in a geographic sequence from Maluku and the Lesser Sunda islands through New Guinea and its adjacent islands, and throughout the Australian mainland to Tasmania. They comprise all languages of Australasia (Oceania) not covered by phylosectors 3=Austronesian or 5=Indo-European. Zones 20= to 24= cover all so-called "Papuan" languages, spoken on Maluku and the Lesser Sunda islands and the New Guinea mainland, which have been previously treated within the "Trans-New Guinea" hypothesis: 20= ARAFURA geozone 21= MAMBERAMO geozone 22= MANDANGIC phylozone 23= OWALAMIC phylozone 24= TRANSIRIANIC phylozone Zones 25= to 27= cover all other so-called "Papuan" languages, on the New Guinea mainland, Bismarck archipelago, New Britain, New Ireland and Solomon islands, which have not been treated within the "Trans-New Guinea" hypothesis: 25= CENDRAWASIH geozone 26= SEPIK-VALLEY geozone 27= BISMARCK-SEA geozone Zones 28= to 29= cover all languages spoken traditionally across the Australian mainland, on the offshore Elcho, Howard, Crocodile and Torres Strait islands (excluding Darnley island), and formerly on the island of Tasmania. An "Australian" hypothesis covers all these languages, excluding the extinct and little known languages of Tasmania, comprising (1.) an area of more diffuse and complex relationships in the extreme north, covered here by geozone 28=, and (2.) a more closely related affinity (Pama+ Nyungan) throughout the rest of Australia, covered by 24 of the 25 sets of phylozone 29=.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Inclusion and Financial Capability
    Financial Inclusion and Financial Capability in Morobe and Madang Provinces, Papua New Guinea Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized An initial report of the Papua New Guinea Public Disclosure Authorized National Financial Capability Survey Bank of Papua New Guinea Institute of National Affairs 9363_PNG FinancialCapacitySurvey_1601939_CVR.indd 1 11/19/15 8:17 AM Bank of Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea Institute for National Affairs The World Bank Financial Inclusion and Financial Capability in Morobe and Madang Provinces Papua New Guinea An initial report of the Papua New Guinea National Financial Capability Survey This Project is financially supported by the Korean Poverty Reduction and Socio-Economic Development Trust Fund II 9363_PNG FinancialCapacitySurvey_1601939_CH00_FM.indd 1 11/18/15 10:15 AM Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ISBN 9980-77-182-8 National Library Service—Papua New Guinea First published: June 2015 Published by: Institute of National Affairs P.O. Box 1530 Port Moresby NCD Papua New Guinea Copyright: This report is a joint product of the project team composed of staff and consultants from Bank of Papua New Guinea, the Institute of National Affairs and The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the authors and should do not necessarily reflect the views of Board of the Bank of Papua New Guinea, the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent, or the Board of Institute of National Affairs. The Bank of Papua New Guinea, Institute of National Affairs, and The World Bank do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • An Indo-Pacific Language in Nepal
    Kusunda: An Indo-Pacific language in Nepal Paul Whitehouse†, Timothy Usher†, Merritt Ruhlen†‡§, and William S.-Y. Wang¶ʈ †Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501; ‡Department of Anthropological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; ¶Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan 11529; and ʈDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Communicated by Murray Gell-Mann, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, November 23, 2003 (received for review January 4, 2002) The Kusunda people of central Nepal have long been regarded as Chepang, who also were forest dwellers and spoke a Tibeto- a relic tribe of South Asia. They are, or were until recently, Burman language. Later scholars often assumed, without look- seminomadic hunter-gatherers, living in jungles and forests, with ing at the data collected by Hodgson, that Kusunda was a a language that shows no similarities to surrounding languages. Tibeto-Burman language. Kusunda was classified essentially on They are often described as shorter and darker than neighboring the basis of its neighbor’s language, not its own, and this error tribes. Our research indicates that the Kusunda language is a perpetuated itself similar to a scribal error in a medieval member of the Indo-Pacific family. This is a surprising finding manuscript (7–9). inasmuch as the Indo-Pacific family is located on New Guinea and We have discovered evidence that the Kusunda language is in surrounding islands. The possibility that Kusunda is a remnant of fact a member of the Indo-Pacific family of languages (10). The the migration that led to the initial peopling of New Guinea and Indo-Pacific family historically occupied a vast area from the Australia warrants additional investigation from both a linguistic Andaman Islands in the Indian Ocean to the Solomon Islands in and genetic perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Order Change in Papua New Guinea Austronesian
    WORD ORDER CHANGE IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA AUSTRONESIAN LANGUAGES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN LINGUISTICS AUGUST 1982 BY Joel Bradshaw Dissertation Committee: George W. Grace, Chairman Byron W. Bender Derek Bickerton Roderick A. Jacobs Michael Hamnett Anatole Lyovin Lawrence A. Reid We certify that we have read this dissertation and that in our opinion it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics. DISSERTATION COMMITTEE Chairman ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people and institutions contributed to this work. The initial impetus to undertake the research came from George Grace and Andrew Pawley, principal investigators on the Oceanic Comparative Linguistics Project funded by National Science Foundation grant no. BNS 75-19451. That project made it possible for Peter Lincoln, Frank Lichtenberk, and myself to do fieldwork in Papua New Guinea in 1976. George Grace, Andrew Pawley, and Peter Lincoln have been my principal mentors as an Austronesianist. Pete instigated much of my thinking in this study. His wife Satoko provided invaluable help in getting this record of that thinking into proper shape. I have also profited from long discussions with Frank Lichtenberk, who has often done me the favor of being hard to convince. Among the many in Papua New Guinea who helped make the fieldwork a success, I wish to express particular gratitude to the Sawanga family--Yali (now deceased), Enike, and all their children--who looked after me in their village; and to Jeff Siegel, my host in Lae.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Western Melanesian Languages, Language Families, and Endangerement Levels [This Draft Research Document Was Compiled Based On
    1 Western Melanesian languages, language families, and endangerement levels [This draft research document was compiled based on various sources by Dr. Gregory Anderson for the Living Tongues Institute for Endangered Languages. Do not cite without permission. Contact: [email protected]] Summary 504 languages – 5 Creoles = 499 languages counted GI (Genetic Diversity Index) 499 languages / 48 language families = .096 EI (Endangerment Index) = 2124/504 = 4.21 low Number Language name Genetic (phylum, family) affiliation Endanger- Research Country / Countries of ment Index Index where spoken Speakers (1 to 5 scale) 1 Laua TNG >> E > C/SE > Mailuan 1 Papua New Guinea 1? Aore AN >>> Remote Oceanic > N/C Van > NE 1 Vanuatu Vanuatu/ Banks Islands 4 Zire AN >>> Remote Oceanic > New Caledonian > S 1 New Caledonia 6 Ura AN >> C/E Oceanic > S Vanuatu > Erromanga 1 Vanuatu 7 Kamasa TNG >> C/W > Angan 1 Papua New Guinea 7 Makolkol E. Pap > YS-NB > New Britain 1 Papua New Guinea < 8 Araki AN >>> Remote Oceanic > N/C Van > NE 1 Vanuatu Vanuatu/ Banks Islands 10 Asumboa AN >>> CE Oc. >> E Outer Islands 1 Solomon Islands 10 Sene TNG >> C/W > Huon-Finisterre 1 Papua New Guinea 10 Susuami TNG >> C/W > Angan 1 Papua New Guinea 10 Zazao AN >>> W.Oc. >> New Ireland 1 Solomon Islands < 10 Maragus AN >>> Remote Oceanic > N/C Van > Malekula 1 Vanuatu Interior 12 Kawacha TNG >> C/W > Angan 1 Papua New Guinea 15 Laghu AN >>> W.Oc. >> New Ireland 1 Solomon Islands 15 Tanimbili AN >>> CE Oc. >> E Outer Islands 1 Solomon Islands 16 Pwapwa AN >>> Remote Oceanic > New Caledonian > N 1 New Caledonia < 20 Nasarian AN >>> Remote Oceanic > N/C Van > Malekula 1 Vanuatu Interior < 20 Sowa AN >>> Remote Oceanic > N/C Van > NE 1.5 Vanuatu Vanuatu/ Banks Islands 24 Teanu AN >>> CE Oc.
    [Show full text]
  • Matukar-Panau: a Case Study in Language Revitalization*
    Matukar-Panau: A case study in language revitalization* Theresa Sepulveda Senior Linguistics Thesis Swarthmore College 2010 …we must do some serious rethinking of our priorities, lest linguistics go down in history as the only science that presided obliviously over the disappearance of 90% of the very field to which it is dedicated. -Michael Krauss (1992), ―The world‘s languages in crisis‖ in Language 68 (1):10 Abstract This case study in language revitalization focuses on the Oceanic language of Matukar-Panau from Papua New Guinea. Recent work on a talking dictionary of Matukar in Swarthmore College‘s Laboratory for Endangered Languages Research and Documentation as well as the development of an orthography and first book in Matukar will be evaluated in terms of the viability of Matukar in the 21st century. I will first present the sociolinguistic background of Matukar in order to examine the extent and cause of Matukar‘s endangerment. Categories will include the history, geography, government recognition of, and demography of, Matukar and Matukar villagers (Tsunoda 2005). An emphasis will be placed on the reaction of the ethnic group of Matukar villagers to the growing dominance of Tok Pisin and the corresponding language shift (Dorian 1981). Next, I will examine the language endangerment phenomenon and define language death. In order to classify Matukar on a scale of language endangerment, I will describe Michael Krauss‘s (2007) and Joshua Fishman‘s (1991) classification systems of language vitality. I will then present Matukar‘s ratings based on UNESCO‘s document on language vitality and endangerment (2003). These systems provide a quantitative way to identify the characteristics of a dying language in areas such as age of speaker population, domains of language use, and availability of written material.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction 2
    Sheila Feldmanis 1 ENC001 1. Introduction Pidgin languages have their origins in the eighteenth century and arose from the need for two or more peoples to communicate where a common language did not exist. A pidgin can be described as one of four types depending on where in the process of development it occurs, jargon, pidgin, extended or expanded pidgin and Creole. The difference is best described as having “… a gradual increase in complexity.” (McArthur 1998:450) with jargons being the most simplified: jargon – consists of a very small vocabulary and greater individual variation; stable pidgin – is more complex, has social norms but is still limited in vocabulary and structure; extended or expanded pidgin – has stabilised and expanded to develop more complex grammatical structures and is well-established, sometimes having official status; Creole – when a pidgin is used as the first language in a community. An expanded pidgin is not so easily definable from a Creole as both use complex structures and similar features. The main difference is not in the form or structure but in the way the pidgin is used (McArthur 1998:450). 2. Aim The aim of this study is to compare Tok Pisin with English and, in doing so, try to determine whether it is a developing language, moving forwards in its own right, or whether it is a language in the process of disappearing. This possibility was discussed in 1985 by Don Laycock in the article “The Future of Tok Pisin” in Handbook of Tok Pisin (New Guinea Pidgin), where he predicts that the language will decline in popularity and use and that “… in perhaps 50 years time, Tok Pisin will most likely be being studied by scholars among a small community of old men.” (1985:667).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue 2012 Part I ISSN: 0023-1959
    Language & Linguistics in Melanesia Special Issue 2012 Part I ISSN: 0023-1959 Journal of the Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea ISSN: 0023-1959 Special Issue 2012 Harald Hammarström & Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.) History, contact and classification of Papuan languages Part One Language & Linguistics in Melanesia Special Issue 2012 Part I ISSN: 0023-1959 VERBS WITH PRONOMINAL OBJECT PREFIXES IN FINISTERRE-HUON LANGUAGES Edgar Suter University of Cologne [email protected] ABSTRACT The Finisterre-Huon stock was established by Kenneth McElhanon (1975). His evidence for a genealogical relationship among these 60 plus languages is reviewed and found to be compelling. In this article I take up one of his pieces of evidence, verbs with pronominal object prefixes, and elaborate on it. The Finisterre-Huon languages have a small closed class of transitive verbs taking pronominal object prefixes. A few of these verbs are cognate across both putative first-order subgroups, the Huon Peninsula family and the Finisterre-Saruwaged family, and can be reconstructed for proto Finisterre-Huon. Most of the pronominal object prefixes can also be reconstructed and are found to be identical to the free pronouns proposed for proto Trans New Guinea by Stephen Wurm (1975) and Malcolm Ross (2005), to which I suggest adding *ya 'they'. Three of the prefixed verbs reconstructed for proto Finisterre-Huon have cognates in other Trans New Guinea subfamilies giving rise to higher level reconstructions. KEYWORDS: Finisterre-Huon, Trans New Guinea, reconstruction, verb morphology, personal pronouns, object verbs INTRODUCTION The Finisterre-Huon languages are spoken in the northern half of Morobe Province and the adjacent part of Madang Province in Papua New Guinea.1 They cover the whole Huon Peninsula, except for the coastal fringes where Oceanic languages are spoken, run along the Saruwaged mountains and end in the Finisterre Range, which straddles the border between 1 The research for this paper was commissioned by the Department of Linguistics of the University of Cologne, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • English Straight and Tok Pisin Stret: a Case Study from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics
    STUDIES IN LOGIC, GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 61 (74) 2020 DOI: 10.2478/slgr-2020-0005 Krzysztof Kosecki University of Łódź e-mail: [email protected] ORCID: 0000–0002–6163–3720 ENGLISH STRAIGHT AND TOK PISIN STRET: A CASE STUDY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS Abstract. The framework of cognitive linguistics can be an efficient tool to represent the conceptual scope of meaning extension in reduced lexicons of pid- gins and creoles. Image-schema based metaphors (Lakoff, 1993; Cienki, 1998) underlie the usage of English straight and its Tok Pisin counterpart stret, but the creole employs the concept in more contexts than English. The resultant variation in the scope of metaphor takes the form of a particular source domain being used to conceptualize more target domains than in the lexifier language. Functioning mainly as a compensation strategy, the variation is the effect of strong influence of English on the conceptual system of the creole. Keywords: adjunct, creole, English, image schema, metaphor, pidgin, straight, stret, Tok Pisin. 1. Introduction Contact languages derive the bulk of their lexicons from dominant lex- ifier languages. Pidgins have small lexicons “tailored to meet the functional needs” of their users (Sebba, 1997, p. 17). Creole lexicons are more com- plex, but still more basic than those of fully developed languages. Whereas a native speaker of a fully-fledged language can use between 15,000–20,000 and 50,000 lemmas1 (Aitchison, 2003, p. 7; Nation & Webb, 2011), a speaker of a contact language rarely has more than 2,000 words at their disposal. Because such languages have far fewer lexemes to express a comparable number of concepts (Romaine, 1988, pp.
    [Show full text]