DOCSLIB.ORG

Gullstrand, Einstein, and the Nobel Prize

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gullstrand, Einstein, and the Nobel Prize SPECIAL ARTICLE Gullstrand, Einstein, and the Nobel Prize James G. Ravin, MD nly one individual who practiced ophthalmology for a significant period has ever received a Nobel Prize. This was Allvar Gullstrand, MD (1862-1930) (Figure 1), a Swede who was awarded the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine in 1911. Al- though Gullstrand is often said to be the only Nobel laureate who was an ophthal- mologist,O this is incorrect. Fritz Pregl, MD (1869-1930), an Austrian ophthalmologist who de- serted the eye for analytical chemistry, received the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1923. Walter Hess, MD (1881-1973), a Swiss ophthalmologist and physiologist, was awarded the Nobel Prize in physi- ology or medicine in 1949 for his work on autonomic control by the hypothalamus. The king of Sweden, Gustav V, awarded vances, far more intense light and sharp Gullstrand the prize on behalf of the con- focus of the beam. ferring organization, the Royal Swedish Ophthalmologists who use this valu- Academy of Sciences “for his works con- able instrument so routinely today may be cerning the dioptrics of the eye.”1 Gull- surprised to learn that it was not imme- strand was recognized for making the most diately incorporated into clinical prac- significant contribution to our understand- tice. Earlier ophthalmologists, in gen- ing of the eye as a refractive organ follow- eral, believed that existing systems of ing the pioneering work of Hermann von illumination were sufficient. A long se- Helmholtz, MD, the German physician and ries of descriptions by many investiga- physiologist who invented the ophthal- tors, especially Alfred Vogt’s atlases, helped moscope in 1850. popularize use of this instrument. Today, Gullstrand is best known as Gullstrand was the Swedish repre- the inventor of the slitlamp. When his slit- sentative to the International Congress of lamp was combined with a microscope Ophthalmology held in Washington, DC, made by members of Zeiss Optical Works, in 1922. The president of the congress, Jena, Germany, it became the basis of the George de Schweinitz, MD, stated that the instrument that is still used in every oph- most important scientific contribution at thalmologist’s office today. Before the de- the meeting was Gullstrand’s demonstra- velopment of this exceptionally useful de- tion of an improved form of his inven- vice, examination of the anterior segment tion. De Schweinitz added jokingly, medi- of the eye could be done with a corneal cine now has a “gentleman with the lamp,” microscope. However, the lighting sys- a male counterpart to nursing’s Florence tems available were far inferior to Gull- Nightingale, the lady with the lamp.2(p330) strand’s slitlamp. At best, they used a dim Gullstrand made another important electric lamp that focused light poorly. contribution to ophthalmology, a reflex- Gullstrand first demonstrated his slit- less ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmoscopy lamp in 1911, the same year he received can be made difficult by the glare of re- the Nobel Prize for his contributions to op- flexes formed from the cornea and other tics. It incorporated 2 important ad- layers of the eye, which act like mirrors, reflecting light back at the examiner. Bright sources of illumination and small pupils From the Department of Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Ohio, are contributory factors. The solution to Toledo. this problem is either to separate the sys- ARCH OPHTHALMOL / VOL 117, MAY 1999 670 ©1999 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/28/2021 tems of illumination and observa- tion or to use polarized light. Gull- strand used the first of these 2 options.3 Other ophthalmologists have been nominated, but not selected, for the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine. Hjalmar Schio¨tz, MD, was considered for his tonometer, as was Karl Koller, MD, for his discovery of topical anesthesia in the eye. Jules Gonin, MD, nearly received the award for his innovations in retinal detachment surgery. He was recom- mended by the Nobel committee in 1934, but died before the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences made 4 Figure 1. Allvar Gullstrand, MD (1862-1930). Figure 2. Albert Einstein, PhD (1879-1955). its decision. The Nobel Prize has Courtesy of Howe Library, Massachusetts Eye Courtesy of Corbis Images, New York, NY. been awarded to other scientists and Ear Infirmary, Boston. whose work concerns the function of the eye. In 1967, Ragnar Granit, their prize; Gullstrand declined the previous recipients of a prize and MD, Haldan Hartline, MD, and Nobel Prize in physics in favor of the members of the academy. The nomi- George Wald, MD, were the desig- Nobel Prize in physiology or medi- nations are reviewed by a commit- nees for their contributions to our cine.5(pp73-74) The Nobel statutes re- tee of 5 individuals, with a separate understanding of the chemistry and quire committee deliberations to be committee for each prize. Each com- physiology of vision. In 1981, David kept confidential. So what tran- mittee then submits its report to a Hubel, MD, and Torsten Weisel, spired during the committee meet- section within the academy for its MD, were the recipients for their ings in 1911 has never been made approval. The final decision is made work on information processing in public. We do not know if Gull- by a vote of the full academy. The the visual system. strand excused himself during the process in medicine or physiology The 5 original Nobel Prizes discussions. is similar, except that the Karolin- were first given in 1901 in the fields From 1911 to 1929, Gull- ska Institute, not the academy, is of physics, chemistry, physiology or strand was a member of the Nobel involved. medicine, peace, and literature. The Committee for Physics, and served From1910to1922,Einsteinwas Nobel Prize in economics was added as its chairman from 1923 to 1929. nominated every year except 2, 1911 in 1969. The prize has often been a During the academic year 1925- and 1915.5(p68) He had published sev- matter of national pride. The Swed- 1926, he was president of the Royal eral important papers in the first de- ish people were pleased when Gull- Swedish Academy of Sciences, the cade of the new century, and was strand was named a recipient, for body that awards the Nobel Prizes widely recognized for the importance until that time no citizen of the con- in chemistry and physics (as well as of his contributions. However, Ein- ferring country had ever won in 2 of economics since 1969). stein was a theoretical physicist, and the 5 categories: physics and physi- Albert Einstein, PhD (Figure by the terms of Alfred Nobel’s will, ology or medicine. 2), (1879-1955) was nominated for the prize was to go for works of Gullstrand is the only indi- the Nobel Prize in physics many times proved, not theoretic, value to hu- vidual who both received and also and was awarded this prize while manity. Nobel, who had died in 1896, declined a Nobel Prize. (Rarely has Gullstrand was a member of the No- left a will that stated the proceeds a Nobel Prize been declined. Rus- belCommitteeforPhysics.Gullstrand “shall be annually distributed in the sian author Boris L. Pasternak de- was a strong personality and a pow- form of prizes to those who, during clined the Nobel Prize for litera- erful force on the committee. He the preceding year, shall have con- ture in 1958, French writer Jean- wrote 2 harsh opinions against giv- ferred the greatest benefit on man- Paul Sartre declined the Nobel Prize ing the prize to Einstein, in 1921 and kind.”6 The nominations for Einstein for literature in 1964, and Le Duc 1922. Einstein did receive the Nobel were strong. Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Tho, of North Vietnam, declined the Prize in physics in 1921, which was Planck, PhD, the 1918 recipient in Nobel Prize for peace in 1973.) In not awarded until 1922. physics, said Einstein had taken the 1910 and in 1911, Gullstrand was To understand what took place first step beyond Isaac Newton. Niels nominated for the Nobel Prize in requires an understanding of how Henrik David Bohr, PhD, the eventual physics. In 1911, the Nobel Com- the selection process works. The 1922 winner, described Einstein’s mittee for Physics, of which he was Royal Swedish Academy of Sci- work as “advances of decisive signifi- a member, suggested that he re- ences selects the awardees in phys- cance for the development of research ceive the prize. At the same time, the ics, chemistry, and economics. in physics.”5(pp72-73) Nobel Committee for Physiology or Nominations are made only by A major part of the problem Medicine was considering him for invitation. The invitees include all was that Einstein’s ideas were not ARCH OPHTHALMOL / VOL 117, MAY 1999 671 ©1999 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/28/2021 easy to understand. Relativity theory, able by physical means are, how- proven to be of lasting importance, his most important contribution, re- ever, so small that, in general they but has been eclipsed by his better mains a difficult concept. Accord- lie below the limits of experimental known relativity theory. Gull- ing to Einstein’s general theory of error.”5(p74) He also misinterpreted strand’s contributions to ophthalmol- relativity, gravity is not a force as critical experiments by others. Ar- ogy have also stood the test of time. Newton had described, but is a rhenius’ report on the photoelec- curved field in the continuum of tric effect was also negative. In the Accepted for publication December 4, space and time, created by the pres- aftermath of these 2 reports, the de- 1998.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Honolulu Star-Advertiser
    B CITY EDITOR: David Butts / [email protected] / 529-4310 WEDNESDAY 10/7/20 VANDALS AT WORK A $20,000 digital sign is damaged at Makapu‘u Lighthouse Trail over the weekend >> B2 ——— BIG Q >> B2 COMICS & PUZZLES >> B7-9 KOKUA LINE CHRISTINE DONNELLY Must apply for extended jobless benefits uestion: Are the extended benefits Q automatic once I run out of unemploy- ment? It’s getting close. What do I do? Answer: No, Pan- demic Emergency Unem- ployment Compensation is not automatic. You have to apply for this pro- gram, which adds 13 weeks of benefits for eligi- UCLA VIA AP / 2015 ble claimants, and you must have a zero balance Andrea Ghez, professor of physics and astronomy at UCLA, was one of three scientists who was awarded this year’s Nobel Prize in in your Unemployment In- physics for advancing the understanding of black holes. Ghez was photographed on the university’s campus. surance account before you do so, according to the state Department of Labor and Industrial Rela- Nobel winner is Keck Observatory user tions. You would apply through your online UI ac- Astronomer Andrea Ghez has been studying the ry’s telescopes, Lewis said count and answer a series Ghez probably uses them of questions to determine Galactic Center from Hawaii island since 1995 more often than anyone whether you are eligible. else — about a dozen nights For instructions on how Star-Advertiser staff covering a supermassive per year. to apply, see labor.hawaii. and news services black hole at the center of The observatory’s twin gov/ui/.
    [Show full text]
  • 書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 N1 Ueber Das Zustandekommen Der
    書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 Ueber das Zustandekommen der Diphtherie-immunitat und der Tetanus-Immunitat bei thieren / Emil Adolf N1 1890 Georg thieme 1901 von Behring N2 Diphtherie und tetanus immunitaet / Emil Adolf von Behring und Kitasato 19-- [Akitomo Matsuki] 1901 Malarial fever its cause, prevention and treatment containing full details for the use of travellers, University press of N3 1902 1902 sportsmen, soldiers, and residents in malarious places / by Ronald Ross liverpool Ueber die Anwendung von concentrirten chemischen Lichtstrahlen in der Medicin / von Prof. Dr. Niels N4 1899 F.C.W.Vogel 1903 Ryberg Finsen Mit 4 Abbildungen und 2 Tafeln Twenty-five years of objective study of the higher nervous activity (behaviour) of animals / Ivan N5 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by W. Horsley Gantt ; with the collaboration of G. Volborth ; and c1928 International Publishing 1904 an introduction by Walter B. Cannon Conditioned reflexes : an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex / by Ivan Oxford University N6 1927 1904 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by G.V. Anrep Press N7 Die Ätiologie und die Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose / Robert Koch ; eingeleitet von M. Kirchner 1912 J.A.Barth 1905 N8 Neue Darstellung vom histologischen Bau des Centralnervensystems / von Santiago Ramón y Cajal 1893 Veit 1906 Traité des fiévres palustres : avec la description des microbes du paludisme / par Charles Louis Alphonse N9 1884 Octave Doin 1907 Laveran N10 Embryologie des Scorpions / von Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov 1870 Wilhelm Engelmann 1908 Immunität bei Infektionskrankheiten / Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov ; einzig autorisierte übersetzung von Julius N11 1902 Gustav Fischer 1908 Meyer Die experimentelle Chemotherapie der Spirillosen : Syphilis, Rückfallfieber, Hühnerspirillose, Frambösie / N12 1910 J.Springer 1908 von Paul Ehrlich und S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Peace Prize
    TITLE: Learning From Peace Makers OVERVIEW: Students examine The Dalai Lama as a Nobel Laureate and compare / contrast his contributions to the world with the contributions of other Nobel Laureates. SUBJECT AREA / GRADE LEVEL: Civics and Government 7 / 12 STATE CONTENT STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS: -Identify, research, and clarify an event, issue, problem or phenomenon of significance to society. -Gather, use, and evaluate researched information to support analysis and conclusions. OBJECTIVES: The student will demonstrate the ability to... -know and understand The Dalai Lama as an advocate for peace. -research and report the contributions of others who are recognized as advocates for peace, such as those attending the Peace Conference in Portland: Aldolfo Perez Esquivel, Robert Musil, William Schulz, Betty Williams, and Helen Caldicott. -compare and contrast the contributions of several Nobel Laureates with The Dalai Lama. MATERIALS: -Copies of biographical statements of The Dalai Lama. -List of Nobel Peace Prize winners. -Copy of The Dalai Lama's acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize. -Bulletin board for display. PRESENTATION STEPS: 1) Students read one of the brief biographies of The Dalai Lama, including his Five Point Plan for Peace in Tibet, and his acceptance speech for receiving the Nobel Prize for Peace. 2) Follow with a class discussion regarding the biography and / or the text of the acceptance speech. 3) Distribute and examine the list of Nobel Peace Prize winners. 4) Individually, or in cooperative groups, select one of the Nobel Laureates (give special consideration to those coming to the Portland Peace Conference). Research and prepare to report to the class who the person was and why he / she / they won the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Pauling-Linus.Pdf
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES L I N U S C A R L P A U L I N G 1901—1994 A Biographical Memoir by J A C K D. D UNITZ Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1997 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. LINUS CARL PAULING February 28, 1901–August 19, 1994 BY JACK D. DUNITZ INUS CARL PAULING was born in Portland, Oregon, on LFebruary 28, 1901, and died at his ranch at Big Sur, California, on August 19, 1994. In 1922 he married Ava Helen Miller (died 1981), who bore him four children: Linus Carl, Peter Jeffress, Linda Helen (Kamb), and Edward Crellin. Pauling is widely considered the greatest chemist of this century. Most scientists create a niche for themselves, an area where they feel secure, but Pauling had an enormously wide range of scientific interests: quantum mechanics, crys- tallography, mineralogy, structural chemistry, anesthesia, immunology, medicine, evolution. In all these fields and especially in the border regions between them, he saw where the problems lay, and, backed by his speedy assimilation of the essential facts and by his prodigious memory, he made distinctive and decisive contributions. He is best known, perhaps, for his insights into chemical bonding, for the discovery of the principal elements of protein secondary structure, the alpha-helix and the beta-sheet, and for the first identification of a molecular disease (sickle-cell ane- mia), but there are a multitude of other important contri- This biographical memoir was prepared for publication by both The Royal Society of London and the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Peptide Chemistry up to Its Present State
    Appendix In this Appendix biographical sketches are compiled of many scientists who have made notable contributions to the development of peptide chemistry up to its present state. We have tried to consider names mainly connected with important events during the earlier periods of peptide history, but could not include all authors mentioned in the text of this book. This is particularly true for the more recent decades when the number of peptide chemists and biologists increased to such an extent that their enumeration would have gone beyond the scope of this Appendix. 250 Appendix Plate 8. Emil Abderhalden (1877-1950), Photo Plate 9. S. Akabori Leopoldina, Halle J Plate 10. Ernst Bayer Plate 11. Karel Blaha (1926-1988) Appendix 251 Plate 12. Max Brenner Plate 13. Hans Brockmann (1903-1988) Plate 14. Victor Bruckner (1900- 1980) Plate 15. Pehr V. Edman (1916- 1977) 252 Appendix Plate 16. Lyman C. Craig (1906-1974) Plate 17. Vittorio Erspamer Plate 18. Joseph S. Fruton, Biochemist and Historian Appendix 253 Plate 19. Rolf Geiger (1923-1988) Plate 20. Wolfgang Konig Plate 21. Dorothy Hodgkins Plate. 22. Franz Hofmeister (1850-1922), (Fischer, biograph. Lexikon) 254 Appendix Plate 23. The picture shows the late Professor 1.E. Jorpes (r.j and Professor V. Mutt during their favorite pastime in the archipelago on the Baltic near Stockholm Plate 24. Ephraim Katchalski (Katzir) Plate 25. Abraham Patchornik Appendix 255 Plate 26. P.G. Katsoyannis Plate 27. George W. Kenner (1922-1978) Plate 28. Edger Lederer (1908- 1988) Plate 29. Hennann Leuchs (1879-1945) 256 Appendix Plate 30. Choh Hao Li (1913-1987) Plate 31.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE Opened up the Science of Radioactivity
    ARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE opened up the science of radioactivity. She is best known as the discoverer of the radioactive elements polonium and radium and as the first person to win two Nobel prizes. For scientists and the public, her radium was a key to a basic change in our understanding of matter and energy. Her work not only influenced the development of fundamental science but also ushered in a new era in medical research and treatment. This file contains most of the text of the Web exhibit “Marie Curie and the Science of Radioactivity” at http://www.aip.org/history/curie/contents.htm. You must visit the Web exhibit to explore hyperlinks within the exhibit and to other exhibits. Material in this document is copyright © American Institute of Physics and Naomi Pasachoff and is based on the book Marie Curie and the Science of Radioactivity by Naomi Pasachoff, Oxford University Press, copyright © 1996 by Naomi Pasachoff. Site created 2000, revised May 2005 http://www.aip.org/history/curie/contents.htm Page 1 of 79 Table of Contents Polish Girlhood (1867-1891) 3 Nation and Family 3 The Floating University 6 The Governess 6 The Periodic Table of Elements 10 Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev (1834-1907) 10 Elements and Their Properties 10 Classifying the Elements 12 A Student in Paris (1891-1897) 13 Years of Study 13 Love and Marriage 15 Working Wife and Mother 18 Work and Family 20 Pierre Curie (1859-1906) 21 Radioactivity: The Unstable Nucleus and its Uses 23 Uses of Radioactivity 25 Radium and Radioactivity 26 On a New, Strongly Radio-active Substance
    [Show full text]
  • Balcomk41251.Pdf (558.9Kb)
    Copyright by Karen Suzanne Balcom 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Karen Suzanne Balcom Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine Committee: E. Glynn Harmon, Supervisor Julie Hallmark Billie Grace Herring James D. Legler Brooke E. Sheldon Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine by Karen Suzanne Balcom, B.A., M.L.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2005 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my first teachers: my father, George Sheldon Balcom, who passed away before this task was begun, and to my mother, Marian Dyer Balcom, who passed away before it was completed. I also dedicate it to my dissertation committee members: Drs. Billie Grace Herring, Brooke Sheldon, Julie Hallmark and to my supervisor, Dr. Glynn Harmon. They were all teachers, mentors, and friends who lifted me up when I was down. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my committee: Julie Hallmark, Billie Grace Herring, Jim Legler, M.D., Brooke E. Sheldon, and Glynn Harmon for their encouragement, patience and support during the nine years that this investigation was a work in progress. I could not have had a better committee. They are my enduring friends and I hope I prove worthy of the faith they have always showed in me. I am grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Irvine's School of Social Sciences Global Connect @
    1 UC Irvine’s School of Social Sciences Global Connect @ UCI Bringing the World to the Classroom hhtp://hypatia.ss.uci.edu/globalconnect The Dalai Lama Workshop The University of California, Irvine’s Global Connect @ UCI undergraduate interns and graduate student participants created the following workshop options to introduce The Dalai Lama to students in grades 8 – 11. It is designed to introduce His Holiness to students who have no previous knowledge concerning the history, leadership, culture and spiritual orientation of The Dalai Lama. Workshop Rationale: 1) “The Story” (A) is a fictional synopsis of the biography of the Dalai Lama’s life. Once the “Story”(Part A) is read in the classroom the name of the Dalai Lama should be introduced by the teacher. 2) In reviewing the story, the Terms (Part B) employed in the fictionalized story should be presented as a means of introducing the students to the realities that help define The Dalai Lama’s history. 3) To promote a more in-depth understanding of the Tibetan experience, proceed to discuss the Discussion Questions (Part C). 4) The Dalai Lama Biographical Profile Worksheet (Part D) To convert the fictional rendition into a fact based profile, students should complete the biographical worksheet in conjunction with 1) reading the included biographical summary of the Dalai Lama or 2) viewing of Compassion in Exile: The Story of the 14th Dalai Lama (a film by Mickey Lemle (1992). 5) Global Recognition: The Nobel Peace Prize (Part E) Assigned readings reprinted in document: The Presentation Speech by the Nobel Committee Chair (1989) Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech by The 14th Dalai Lama (1989) 6) Philosophical & Spiritual Positions of The Dalai Lama (Part F) As a Nobel Laureate and Tibetan –Buddhist leader, The Dalai Lama has addressed people all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Events Myron Kayton Science Pub #19: 2020 Physics Nobel Stop the Spread: the Challenge of Prize Winner Dr
    @harvardsocal @harvardsocal facebook.com/groups/harvardsocal WWW.HARVARDSOCAL.ORG (310) 546-5252 APRIL 2021 Upcoming Events Myron Kayton Science Pub #19: 2020 Physics Nobel Stop the Spread: The Challenge of Prize Winner Dr. Equitable Vaccine Distribution APRIL 2021 - Date and Time TBA Andrea Ghez Virtual Event Join the Harvard Club of Southern Califor- No charge - RSVP required nia for “From the Possibility to the Certain- ty of a Supermassive Black Hole,” a fascinat- ing talk about the Milky Way presented by Film and Discussion: Black Men Photo: New York Times Dr. Andrea Ghez, 2020 Physics Nobel Prize winner and director of the UCLA Galactic in White Coats - A Film by Dale Center Group. This free Zoom event will be held Sunday, April 25 at Okorodudu, MD 3PM. SUN, APR 11 @ 1:00PM Andrea M. Ghez is one of the world’s leading experts in observational Virtual Event astrophysics and heads UCLA’s Galactic Center Group. She has re- No charge, donation appreciated ceived numerous honors and awards, including the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics with Reinhard Genzel and Roger Penrose. She is the fourth woman to have received the Physics award. Dr. Ghez is committed to HGSE Event: Gutman Library the communication of science to the general public as well as inspiring Book Talk young girls into science. FRI, APR 23 @ 9:00AM Through the capture and analysis of twenty years of high-resolution Virtual Event imaging, the UCLA Galactic Center Group has moved the case for a No charge - RSVP required supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy from a possibility to a certainty and provided the best evidence to date for the existence of these truly exotic objects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Government: a Nobel Profession
    The Federal Government: A Nobel Profession A Report on Pathbreaking Nobel Laureates in Government 1901 - 2002 INTRODUCTION The Nobel Prize is synonymous with greatness. A list of Nobel Prize winners offers a quick register of the world’s best and brightest, whose accomplishments in literature, economics, medicine, science and peace have enriched the lives of millions. Over the past century, 270 Americans have received the Nobel Prize for innovation and ingenuity. Approximately one-fourth of these distinguished individuals are, or were, federal employees. Their Nobel contributions have resulted in the eradication of polio, the mapping of the human genome, the harnessing of atomic energy, the achievement of peace between nations, and advances in medicine that not only prolong our lives, but “This report should serve improve their quality. as an inspiration and a During Public Employees Recognition Week (May 4-10, 2003), in an effort to recognize and honor the reminder to us all of the ideas and accomplishments of federal workers past and present, the Partnership for Public Service offers innovation and nobility of this report highlighting 50 American Nobel laureates the work civil servants do whose award-winning achievements occurred while they served in government or whose public service every day and its far- work had an impact on their career achievements. They were honored for their contributions in the fields reaching impact.” of Physiology or Medicine, Economic Sciences, and Physics and Chemistry. Also included are five Americans whose work merited the Peace Prize. Despite this legacy of accomplishment, too few Americans see the federal government as an incubator for innovation and discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureate Surgeons
    Literature Review World Journal of Surgery and Surgical Research Published: 12 Mar, 2020 Nobel Laureate Surgeons Jayant Radhakrishnan1* and Mohammad Ezzi1,2 1Department of Surgery and Urology, University of Illinois, USA 2Department of Surgery, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia Abstract This is a brief account of the notable contributions and some foibles of surgeons who have won the Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine since it was first awarded in 1901. Keywords: Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine; Surgical Nobel laureates; Pathology and surgery Introduction The Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine has been awarded to 219 scientists in the last 119 years. Eleven members of this illustrious group are surgeons although their awards have not always been for surgical innovations. Names of these surgeons with the year of the award and why they received it are listed below: Emil Theodor Kocher - 1909: Thyroid physiology, pathology and surgery. Alvar Gullstrand - 1911: Path of refracted light through the ocular lens. Alexis Carrel - 1912: Methods for suturing blood vessels and transplantation. Robert Barany - 1914: Function of the vestibular apparatus. Frederick Grant Banting - 1923: Extraction of insulin and treatment of diabetes. Alexander Fleming - 1945: Discovery of penicillin. Walter Rudolf Hess - 1949: Brain mapping for control of internal bodily functions. Werner Theodor Otto Forssmann - 1956: Cardiac catheterization. Charles Brenton Huggins - 1966: Hormonal control of prostate cancer. OPEN ACCESS Joseph Edward Murray - 1990: Organ transplantation. *Correspondence: Shinya Yamanaka-2012: Reprogramming of mature cells for pluripotency. Jayant Radhakrishnan, Department of Surgery and Urology, University of Emil Theodor Kocher (August 25, 1841 to July 27, 1917) Illinois, 1502, 71st, Street Darien, IL Kocher received the award in 1909 “for his work on the physiology, pathology and surgery of the 60561, Chicago, Illinois, USA, thyroid gland” [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Who Got Moseley's Prize?
    Chapter 4 Who Got Moseley’s Prize? Virginia Trimble1 and Vera V. Mainz*,2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4575, United States 2Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, United States *E-mail: [email protected]. Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley (1887-1915) made prompt and very skilled use of the then new technique of X-ray scattering by crystals (Bragg scattering) to solve several problems about the periodic table and atoms. He was nominated for both the chemistry and physics Nobel Prizes by Svante Arrhenius in 1915, but was dead at Gallipoli before the committees finished their deliberations. Instead, the 1917 physics prize (announced in 1918 and presented on 6 June 1920) went to Charles Glover Barkla (1877-1944) “for discovery of the Röntgen radiation of the elements.” This, and his discovery of X-ray polarization, were done with earlier techniques that he never gave up. Moseley’s contemporaries and later historians of science have written that he would have gone on to other major achievements and a Nobel Prize if he had lived. In contrast, after about 1916, Barkla moved well outside the scientific mainstream, clinging to upgrades of his older methods, denying the significance of the Bohr atom and quantization, and continuing to report evidence for what he called the J phenomenon. This chapter addresses the lives and scientific endeavors of Moseley and Barkla, something about the context in which they worked and their connections with other scientists, contemporary, earlier, and later. © 2017 American Chemical Society Introduction Henry Moseley’s (Figure 1) academic credentials consisted of a 1910 Oxford BA with first-class honors in Mathematical Moderations and a second in Natural Sciences (physics) and the MA that followed more or less automatically a few years later.
    [Show full text]