Changing Fronts in the Controversies Over Philosophy in Medieval Spain and Provence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Changing Fronts in the Controversies Over Philosophy in Medieval Spain and Provence TheJolirnal a/Jewish Thollght and Philosophy, Vol. 7, pp. 61-82 © 1997 Reprints available directly from the publisher Photocopying permitted by licence only Changing Fronts in the Controversies over Philosophy in Medieval Spain and Provence Dov Schwartz Department of Philosophy, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, ISRAEL Introduction The violent controversies that split medieval Jewry into rationalists and traditionalists were by no means identical in their nature and subject-matter. Though some historians of ideas treat the different outbursts as if they were homogeneous, 1 the differences were sometimes quite profound. Themes that were uppermost in one dispute were completely ignored in another. Positions characteris- tic of one camp at one time were espoused by the other camp in another controversy. Thus, each dispute should be considered on its own merits, and only after an exhaustive study of its evolution and its ideological and cultural makeup can one properly place it in the historical and cultural context of the Middle Ages. As an example of such shifts in the traditionalists' position at different times, let us consider the first anti-Maimonidean contro- versy, stirred up by Samuel b. Ali and Meir Halevi Abulafia 1 See, e.g., J. Guttmann, Philosophies ofJudaism, Gatden City, NY, 1964, pp. 207-236. Among others who have at times treated the entire complex as a uniform controversy are Sarachek and Halkin: J. Sarachek, Faith and Reason: The Conflict over the Rationalism of Maimonides, Williamsport 1935 [hereafter: Sara- chek, Faith and Reason], pp. 168-169: A. S. Halkin, "The Ban on the Study of Philosophy" (Heb.), Perakim 1 (1967), pp. 35-55. And see further below. 61 62 Dov Schwartz (RaMaH). A central- if not the most important - theme was messianism. The traditionalists questioned the conception of the immortality of the soul, while the rationalists supported the Maimonidean doctrine that the ultimate end ("the World to Come") was abstract immortality, other messianic goals being of a temporary nature. Later, however, toward the end of the 13th century, in the dispute spearheaded by Abba Mari of Lunel and Solomon b. Adret of Barcelona (RaShBA), the messianic idea did not come up for discussion at all. A diligent search detects only a few mentions of "redemption" in the many pages of Minhat Kena'ot, Abba Mari's documentation of the dispute; while the question of immortality was treated only marginally. Moreover, in the few references that can be found, the traditionalists accepted the Maimonidean view of the messianic era. Indeed, they feared the antinomistic dangers inherent in radical messianism, and therefore preferred the safer Maimonidean brand of messianism with its insistence on the eternity of the Torah.2 Clearly, then, the various controversies differed considerably, and consequently so did the positions taken by the different parties. I have already had occasion to point out the need for a re-examina- tion of the controversies and their implications;3 in this paper I would like to reconsider one aspect of the overall conflict which has, in fact, been described as its central theme - the problem of the attitude to philosophy sciences or, in the Hebrew of the time, the hokhmot or hokhmot hizoniyyot (literally: "external wisdoms"). It is commonly agreed that one common denominator of the different controversies was a rejection of the authority of science. However, it turns our that attitudes to science were not uniform throughout the different disputes. On the contrary, while the validity of science was a cardinal theme in the twenties and thirties of the 13th century, it was no longer at issue at the end of that century. 2 I shall deal with this example at length in a forthcoming book on the messianic idea in medieval Jewish philosophy (Bar-Han University Press). 3 See D. Schwartz, "Meharsim, Talmudiyyim and Anshei ha-Hokhma- Judah ben Samuel ibm 'Abbas's Views and Preaching" (Heb.), Tarbiz 62 (1993), pp. 585-599; idem. "On the Nature of the Controversy over Medieval Philosophy: R. Yehudah ben Samuel ibn 'Abbas" (Heb.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of jewish Studies, Division C. Vol. II, Jerusalem 1994, pp.71-76..
Recommended publications
  • TALMUDIC STUDIES Ephraim Kanarfogel
    chapter 22 TALMUDIC STUDIES ephraim kanarfogel TRANSITIONS FROM THE EAST, AND THE NASCENT CENTERS IN NORTH AFRICA, SPAIN, AND ITALY The history and development of the study of the Oral Law following the completion of the Babylonian Talmud remain shrouded in mystery. Although significant Geonim from Babylonia and Palestine during the eighth and ninth centuries have been identified, the extent to which their writings reached Europe, and the channels through which they passed, remain somewhat unclear. A fragile consensus suggests that, at least initi- ally, rabbinic teachings and rulings from Eretz Israel traveled most directly to centers in Italy and later to Germany (Ashkenaz), while those of Babylonia emerged predominantly in the western Sephardic milieu of Spain and North Africa.1 To be sure, leading Sephardic talmudists prior to, and even during, the eleventh century were not yet to be found primarily within Europe. Hai ben Sherira Gaon (d. 1038), who penned an array of talmudic commen- taries in addition to his protean output of responsa and halakhic mono- graphs, was the last of the Geonim who flourished in Baghdad.2 The family 1 See Avraham Grossman, “Zik˙atah shel Yahadut Ashkenaz ‘el Erets Yisra’el,” Shalem 3 (1981), 57–92; Grossman, “When Did the Hegemony of Eretz Yisra’el Cease in Italy?” in E. Fleischer, M. A. Friedman, and Joel Kraemer, eds., Mas’at Mosheh: Studies in Jewish and Moslem Culture Presented to Moshe Gil [Hebrew] (Jerusalem, 1998), 143–57; Israel Ta- Shma’s review essays in K˙ ryat Sefer 56 (1981), 344–52, and Zion 61 (1996), 231–7; Ta-Shma, Kneset Mehkarim, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • אוסף מרמורשטיין the Marmorstein Collection
    אוסף מרמורשטיין The Marmorstein Collection Brad Sabin Hill THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Manchester 2017 1 The Marmorstein Collection CONTENTS Acknowledgements Note on Bibliographic Citations I. Preface: Hebraica and Judaica in the Rylands -Hebrew and Samaritan Manuscripts: Crawford, Gaster -Printed Books: Spencer Incunabula; Abramsky Haskalah Collection; Teltscher Collection; Miscellaneous Collections; Marmorstein Collection II. Dr Arthur Marmorstein and His Library -Life and Writings of a Scholar and Bibliographer -A Rabbinic Literary Family: Antecedents and Relations -Marmorstein’s Library III. Hebraica -Literary Periods and Subjects -History of Hebrew Printing -Hebrew Printed Books in the Marmorstein Collection --16th century --17th century --18th century --19th century --20th century -Art of the Hebrew Book -Jewish Languages (Aramaic, Judeo-Arabic, Yiddish, Others) IV. Non-Hebraica -Greek and Latin -German -Anglo-Judaica -Hungarian -French and Italian -Other Languages 2 V. Genres and Subjects Hebraica and Judaica -Bible, Commentaries, Homiletics -Mishnah, Talmud, Midrash, Rabbinic Literature -Responsa -Law Codes and Custumals -Philosophy and Ethics -Kabbalah and Mysticism -Liturgy and Liturgical Poetry -Sephardic, Oriental, Non-Ashkenazic Literature -Sects, Branches, Movements -Sex, Marital Laws, Women -History and Geography -Belles-Lettres -Sciences, Mathematics, Medicine -Philology and Lexicography -Christian Hebraism -Jewish-Christian and Jewish-Muslim Relations -Jewish and non-Jewish Intercultural Influences
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Catalogue
    F i n e Ju d a i C a . pr i n t e d bo o K s , ma n u s C r i p t s , au t o g r a p h Le t t e r s , gr a p h i C & Ce r e m o n i a L ar t in cl u d i n g : th e Ca s s u t o Co ll e C t i o n o F ib e r i a n bo o K s , pa r t iii K e s t e n b a u m & Co m p a n y th u r s d a y , Ju n e 21s t , 2012 K e s t e n b a u m & Co m p a n y . Auctioneers of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Fine Art A Lot 261 Catalogue of F i n e Ju d a i C a . PRINTED BOOKS , MANUSCRI P TS , AUTOGRA P H LETTERS , GRA P HIC & CERE M ONIA L ART ——— To be Offered for Sale by Auction, Thursday, 21st June, 2012 at 3:00 pm precisely ——— Viewing Beforehand: Sunday, 17th June - 12:00 pm - 6:00 pm Monday, 18th June - 10:00 am - 6:00 pm Tuesday, 19th June - 10:00 am - 6:00 pm Wednesday, 20th June - 10:00 am - 6:00 pm No Viewing on the Day of Sale This Sale may be referred to as: “Galle” Sale Number Fifty Five Illustrated Catalogues: $38 (US) * $45 (Overseas) KestenbauM & CoMpAny Auctioneers of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Fine Art .
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Jane Robin Zackin 2008
    Copyright by Jane Robin Zackin 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Jane Robin Zackin certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: A JEW AND HIS MILIEU: ALLEGORY, POLEMIC, AND JEWISH THOUGHT IN SEM TOB’S PROVERBIOS MORALES AND MA’ASEH HA RAV Committee: ____________________________________ Matthew Bailey, Supervisor ____________________________________ Michael Harney ____________________________________ Madeline Sutherland-Meier ____________________________________ Harold Leibowitz ____________________________________ John Zemke A JEW AND HIS MILIEU: ALLEGORY, POLEMIC, AND JEWISH THOUGHT IN SEM TOB’S PROVERBIOS MORALES AND MA’ASEH HA RAV by Jane Robin Zackin, B.A.; M.ED.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2008 Knowledge is a deadly friend When no one sets the rules. King Crimson, “Epitaph” Acknowledgements I would like to thank the members of my committee for their help and encouragement, Dolores Walker for her ongoing support, and my father for his kind generosity. v A JEW AND HIS MILIEU: ALLEGORY, POLEMIC, AND JEWISH THOUGHT IN SEM TOB’S PROVERBIOS MORALES AND MA’ASEH HA RAV Publication No.____________________ Jane Robin Zackin, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin Supervisor: Matthew Bailey In this dissertation, I describe social, economic and political relations between Jews and Christians in medieval Europe before presenting the intellectual and religious context of Jewish life in Christian Spain. The purpose of this endeavor is to provide the framework for analyzing two works, one in Hebrew and one in Castilian, by the Spanish Jewish author Sem Tob de Carrión (1290- c.1370).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ban Placed by the Community of Barcelona on the Study of Philosophy and Allegorical Preaching — a New Study*
    Ram BEN-SHALOM The Open University, Tel Aviv THE BAN PLACED BY THE COMMUNITY OF BARCELONA ON THE STUDY OF PHILOSOPHY AND ALLEGORICAL PREACHING — A NEW STUDY* RÉSUMÉ La mise au ban des études philosophiques imposée par Salomon ben Adret en 1305, constitue l'acmé d'une longue controverse entre le camp philosophique et ses oppo- sants en Provence et en Espagne. Une théorie récente suppose que Ben Adret avait tout d'abord imposé ce ban aux communautés juives d'Espagne et de Provence, puis avait changé d'avis, prétendant que ce bannissement était local, et n'était im- posé qu'à la seule communauté de Barcelone. On a prétendu aussi que cette volte face était la conséquence des relations politiques entre les royaumes de France et d'Aragon, et du conflit autour de l'épineuse question de la juridiction sur la juiverie provençale. Cet article réexamine l'affaire du ban à travers une analyse minutieuse des lettres publiées par Abba Mari de Lunel dans son ouvrage, «Minhat Qena'ot», et parvient à de nouvelles conclusions. Il commence par établir une distinction claire entre deux formes de ban. Le premier ban imposé sur les études philosophi- ques était en effet local, c'est pourquoi il a été maintenu par Ben Adret. Il existait également une deuxième forme de banissement de nature plus générale contre les hérésies et les hérétiques juifs. Il semble que le changement de position de Ben Adret a l'égard du second ban, ne résultait pas de sa crainte de possibles repré- sailles de Philippe le Bon, roi de France, contre les Juifs provençaux.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Halevy, Halivni and The Oral Formation of the Babylonian Talmud Ari Bergmann Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Ari Bergmann All rights reserved ABSTRACT Halevy, Halivni and The Oral Formation of the Babylonian Talmud Ari Bergmann This dissertation is dedicated to a detailed analysis and comparison of the theories on the process of the formation of the Babylonian Talmud by Yitzhak Isaac Halevy and David Weiss Halivni. These two scholars exhibited a similar mastery of the talmudic corpus and were able to combine the roles of historian and literary critic to provide a full construct of the formation of the Bavli with supporting internal evidence to support their claims. However, their historical construct and findings are diametrically opposed. Yitzhak Isaac Halevy presented a comprehensive theory of the process of the formation of the Talmud in his magnum opus Dorot Harishonim. The scope of his work was unprecedented and his construct on the formation of the Talmud encompassed the entire process of the formation of the Bavli, from the Amoraim in the 4th century to the end of the saboraic era (which he argued closed in the end of the 6th century). Halevy was the ultimate guardian of tradition and argued that the process of the formation of the Bavli took place entirely within the amoraic academy by a highly structured and coordinated process and was sealed by an international rabbinical assembly. While Halevy was primarily a historian, David Weiss Halivni is primarily a talmudist and commentator on the Talmud itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalir, False Accusations, and More
    Seforim Sale Seforim Sale by Eliezer Brodt While hunting for seforim and books I recently came across the following excellent titles for sale, from an old library and some other places. Most of these titles are very hard to find. Some of the prices are better than others, but all in all I think they are fair. Almost all the books are in great shape. The sale prices are only for the next three days. After that they might not be available.There is only one copy of most of these titles so it’s being sold on a first come first serve basis. Shipping is not included in the price; that depends on the order and size, ranging between 5-9 dollars a book. Feel free to ask for details about any specific book on the list. All questions should be sent to me at [email protected] thank you and enjoy. Part of the proceeds go to helping the efforts of the seforim blog. א. מחזור סוכות גולדשמידט $50 ב. כתבי ר’ יוסף כספי ג’ חלקים, א. תם כסף שונות ב. אדני כסף ג. עשרה כלי כסף $74 ג. הלכות ארץ ישראל מרדכי מרגליות $27 ד. ספר תיקון הדעות, ליצחק אלבלג, האקדמיה הלאומית,$21 ה. אגרת הרמ”ה $18 ו. השגות הרמ”ך על הרמב”ם –עם הערות ש’ אטלס 16$ ז. ספר העגונות, י’ כהנא, מוסד רב קוק, $30 ח. תשובות ר’ שר שלום גאון מוסד רב קוק $24 ט. הרב זק”ש, מנהגי ארץ ישראל $17 י. מאמר במחויב המציאות לר’ יוסף בן יהודה תלמיד הרמב”ם 8$ יא.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixteenth-Century Hebrew Books in the Library of Congress
    Sixteenth-Century Hebrew Books at the Library of Congress A Finding Aid פה Washington D.C. June 18, 2012 ` Title-page from Maimonides’ Moreh Nevukhim (Sabbioneta: Cornelius Adelkind, 1553). From the collections of the Hebraic Section, Library of Congress, Washington D.C. i Table of Contents: Introduction to the Finding Aid: An Overview of the Collection . iii The Collection as a Testament to History . .v The Finding Aid to the Collection . .viii Table: Titles printed by Daniel Bomberg in the Library of Congress: A Concordance with Avraham M. Habermann’s List . ix The Finding Aid General Titles . .1 Sixteenth-Century Bibles . 42 Sixteenth-Century Talmudim . 47 ii Sixteenth-Century Hebrew Books in the Library of Congress: Introduction to the Finding Aid An Overview of the Collection The art of Hebrew printing began in the fifteenth century, but it was the sixteenth century that saw its true flowering. As pioneers, the first Hebrew printers laid the groundwork for all the achievements to come, setting standards of typography and textual authenticity that still inspire admiration and awe.1 But it was in the sixteenth century that the Hebrew book truly came of age, spreading to new centers of culture, developing features that are the hallmark of printed books to this day, and witnessing the growth of a viable book trade. And it was in the sixteenth century that many classics of the Jewish tradition were either printed for the first time or received the form by which they are known today.2 The Library of Congress holds 675 volumes printed either partly or entirely in Hebrew during the sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Dieter Walldorf for Consideration of the Belkin Judaic Studies Award
    Dieter Walldorf For consideration of the Belkin Judaic Studies Award The Position of Nahmanides during the Maimonidean Controversy The Maimonidean Controversy of the 1230s marks a critical point in the development of the Jewish people in Medieval Europe. It was the first battle fought in the clash of cultures spurred by the Almohad expulsion of Jews from Al-Andalus and the subsequent migration of Andalusian Jews to Provence. At the same time, the controversy’s conclusion (and perhaps the very controversy itself) represented the spirit of Inquisition’s first reaching Jewish life – a spirit that would end Jewish life in France, later Spain, and ultimately in the entirety of Western Europe. The controversy also was a major moment in the life of Nahmanides. Known in retrospect as one of the thinkers in Jewish history, Nahmanides is more famous for events later in his long life: the disputation with Pablo Christiani in 1263, his emigration to the Land of Israel, and his commentary to the Pentateuch completed near the end of his life. Though he was not one of the original parties to the dispute, Nahmanides took a very significant role in the intellectual sphere of the controversy, and while only in his thirties staked out a bold path to navigate the collision of Andalusian and Ashkenazi Judaism. The locus clasicus of Nahmanides’ place in the controversy is the letter he wrote to the Rabbis of Northern France after both a ban and counter-ban had been placed on Maimonides’ D. Walldorf 2 philosophical works. In the letter, Nahmanides issues a three-pronged argument against the French herem on Maimonides, and he then proposes a compromise resolution: to revoke the universal ban on the works, while still opposing group study of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamar Ron Marvin
    AJS Review 41:1 (April 2017), 175–201 . © Association for Jewish Studies 2017 doi:10.1017/S0364009417000083 AHERETIC FROM A GOOD FAMILY?ANEW LOOK AT WHY LEVI B.ABRAHAM B.H. AYIM WAS HOUNDED Tamar Ron Marvin https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms Abstract: Levi b. Abraham b. H. ayim, a popularizer of rationalist phi- losophy active around 1300 in Occitania, was identified as a transgres- sor by proponents of a ban on the study of philosophy. The nature of Levi’s transgressive activities and the reasons why he was targeted have remained elusive, though a consensus view suggests that his socio- economic standing and genuinely radical ideas contributed to his being singled out. In fact, a careful reassessment of the extant sources demonstrates that Levi, as an established member of the elite class, was an inadvertent target, identified in the course of a misunder- standing between Solomon Ibn Adret and his confidant in Perpignan, Crescas Vidal. No more radical than others and one of many popular- izers of rationalism, Levi became a convenient exemplar and test case for ban proponents. They struggled to define the nature of Levi’s poten- tially dangerous effects on his students, however, and Levi remained an equivocal figure even to his detractors. Though vilified and forced out of the home of his patron, Levi was accorded basic respect and often , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at defended; he was never subject to excommunication, censure, or any type of halakhic prosecution. INTRODUCTION An otherwise unremarkable member of the educated class in medieval Perpignan, Levi b.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Manuscripts
    Index of Manuscripts Ms. Breslau, Juedisch-theologisches Seminar Ibn Kaspi) 221n3, 223n13, 295, 297n1, 49 (Parashat Kesef; Ibn Kaspi) 59n217 299n8, 305nn27–28 Ms. Jerusalem, Schocken 24527 (Terumat Ms. Parma, Biblioteca Palatina Kesef, Ibn Kaspi) 60n225, 187n62, Cod. Parm. 775 (Qevuṣat Kesef, ‘Collection 189n79 of Silver’; Ibn Kaspi) 2, 25, 41n117, 55, Ms. London, British Library Or. 12261 187n62 57, 58n208, 59n212 Ms. Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, 265 Cod. Parm. 2630 (Terumat Kesef, Ibn (Qevuṣat Kesef, ‘Collection of Silver’; Ibn Kaspi) 60n225, 187n62, 188, 189n70, Kaspi) 2, 25, 41n117, 55, 57, 58n208, 263–265, 293n141 59n212, 61n229, 102n129 Ms. Prague, Jewish Museum 42 187n62 Ms. New York, Jewish Theological Seminar Ms. Rome, Biblioteca Angelica Or. 60 2443/2 (Tam ha-Kesef; Ibn Kaspi) 221n3, (Retuqqot Kesef and Sharsot Kesef; Ibn 223nn13–14, 295, 297n1, 299n8, Kaspi) 61nn227–228 301nn12–13, 303n19, 305nn27–28, Ms. St. Petersburg, Russian National Library 307n34, 307n36, 307n40, 313n59 Evr. ii a391, (Tam ha-Kesef; Ibn Kaspi) Ms. Oxford, Bodleian Library Poc. 17 (Terumat 221n3, 223n13, 295 Kesef, Ibn Kaspi) 60n225, 187n62, 188, Ms. Vatican, Biblioteca Apostolica 189n70, 263–265, 293n141 ebr. 283 (Ṣeror ha-Kesef; Ibn Kaspi) Ms. Paris, Bibliotheque Nationale 61n226 heb. 184 (Parashat Kesef; Ibn Kaspi) ebr. 296 (Terumat Kesef, Ibn Kaspi) 59n217 60n225, 187n62, 189n70 heb. 1244 (Sharshot Kesef; Ibn Kaspi) Ms. Vienna, Oesterreichische Nationalbib- 61n228 liothek Cod hebr. 27 (Terumat Kesef, Ibn Ms. Paris, Ecole Rabbinique 98 (Tam ha-Kesef; Kaspi) 60n225, 187n62, 188, 189n70 Index of Subjects Abner of Burgos 55 on history 243 Abraham (biblical figure) 37, 76 Ibn Rushd’s paraphrases and commen- Abraham b.
    [Show full text]
  • For Body and Soul Jewish Life Revolves Around Food What Is the Origin Of
    28 May 2009 Dr Maurice M. Mizrahi Congregation Adat Reyim Tikkun Lel Shavuot (Erev Shavuot 5769) Food For body and soul Jewish life revolves around food Summary of holidays: They tried to kill us, we won, let’s eat (or not) . Rosh Hashanah -- Feast . Tzom Gedalia -- Fast . Yom Kippur -- More fasting . Sukkot -- Feast . Hoshanah Rabbah -- More feasting . Simchat Torah -- Keep feasting . Month of Heshvan -- No feasts or fasts for a whole month. Get a grip on yourself. Hanukkah -- Eat potato pancakes . Fast of Tenth of Tevet -- Do not eat potato pancakes . Tu B'Shevat -- Feast . Fast of Esther -- Fast . Purim -- Eat pastry . Fast of the First-Born -- Fast . Pessah -- Do not eat pastry . Shavuot -- Dairy feast (cheesecake and blintzes) . 17th of Tammuz -- Fast (definitely no cheesecake or blintzes) . Tish’a B'Av -- Very strict fast (don't even think about cheesecake or blintzes) . Month of Elul -- End of cycle [summary drawn from Internet] What is the origin of eating dairy on Shavuot? Earliest source: Kol Bo [13th century work on Jewish Law, probably by Rabbi Aharon ben Ya'aqob HaKohen of Lunel (1262-1325) first printed in Naples, 1490]: There is an established custom to eat honey and milk on Shavuot since the Torah is compared to honey and milk as it is written, ‘Honey and milk are under your tongue’ (Song of Songs 4:11). John Cooper, "Eat and be Satisfied: A Social History of Jewish Food" (Aronson, 1994): 1. "According to Kalonymos ben Kalonymos, the 14th century Jews of Provence used to eat a specially prepared honey cake in the shape of a 1 ladder on Shavuot.
    [Show full text]