Title Modelling the Demand Evolution of New Shared Mobility Services

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Title Modelling the Demand Evolution of New Shared Mobility Services Modelling the Demand Evolution of New Shared Mobility Title Services( Dissertation_全文 ) Author(s) Zhang, Cen Citation 京都大学 Issue Date 2019-03-25 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.k21747 Right Type Thesis or Dissertation Textversion ETD Kyoto University Modelling the Demand Evolution of New Shared Mobility Services ZHANG CEN i ii Acknowledgments The writing of this dissertation has been one of the most significant academic challenges I have ever had to face. A great many people have contributed to its production. Without their supports and guidance, this study would not have been completed. First of all, I would like to thank my sincere gratitude and deep regards to my supervisor, Associate Prof. Jan-Dirk Schmöcker, in Kyoto University for his patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. Besides my advisor, I would like to thank the rest of my thesis committee and co- supervisors: Prof. Yamata and Associate Prof. Uno in the Kyoto University, for their insightful comments and encouragements, but also for the questions which inspired me to widen my research from various perspectives. Also my sincere thanks also goes to Prof Fuji in the Kyoto University, Asscoiate Prof. Nakamura in Nagoya University who advised me at several stages. Without their precious support it would not be possible to conduct this research. Regards the assistance of administration process, I hope to give this opportunity to express a deep sense of gratitude to thanks to the secretaries, Mrs. Nagata, Mrs. Nishimura and Mrs. Ichihashi, their various helps have made me concentrate on my research. Above all, I would like to thank members of ITS laboratory and all friends who have a great time and willing to share their thoughts and ideas with me in Japan. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family for supporting me spiritually throughout writing this thesis and my life in general. iii iv Abstract Recently, shared mobility, including car-sharing, bicycle-sharing, microtransit and on demand ride service, has emerged as popular forms of alternative transport. This form of collaborative consumption, which promotes the sharing of access to transport service, rather than having individual ownership, will largely save the cost as well as space and of course, reduce carbon emissions. With the emergence of these and other new transport modes, our transport systems are undergoing major changes and behavioural responses are expected (and desired). Understanding long term demand dynamics remains an important challenge for new transport systems. To achieve this, this dissertation contains two parts: One is the adoption process of potential users, that leads a person from initial recognising the scheme and then starting to use it. The other part is the change in behaviour over usage life-time, that is variation of usage frequency from initial usage to finally dropping out/quitting the system. In the first part of this dissertation, our objective is to be able to forecast the number of new adopters and the potential market with facility extension, including when new stations/service areas are added to the system. In order to do so, potential users are divided into two types: Fast and Hesitant adopters. Stations are classified into four groups according to their location: Residential area, Business area, Public service area and Transit Hub. We formulate the adoption model of fast-adopters integrated with an information diffusion model to capture the initial changes. The adoption model for the Hesitant-adopters considers both a follower effect and a hesitant effect. Further, to estimate spatial differences in adoption rates and interconnectedness of stations, location specific parameters and a redistribution model are established. The purpose of the latter is to recognize that despite initial usage being carried v out at a specific station, the new user might be attracted to join the system due to the existence of several stations. The least square method and gradient descent optimization algorithms are used to estimate the parameters. The methodology is applied to data from the Ha:mo RIDE car share system in Toyota city. We observe two peaks in the new user curve which can be explained by our model, the initial peak may be caused by information diffusion whereas the later peak can be explained by market saturation. A comparison between a range of models for estimation and forecasting are made. In the second part of this dissertation, the focus is on describing the individual behaviour changes over time and then forecasting the demand dynamics of system. At first, to describe the stochastic behaviour changes over time by using panel data, an approach based on stochastic state equations (Markov model) is proposed. Transition functions determine the likely change in behaviour from one time period to another. To overcome the problem of a dynamic population and explain seasonal irregularities, we introduce “life-cycle”, “potential demand” and “willingness to use” into our models. With this we discuss time-homogeneity issues, possibilities to identify usage states and calibrate the transition function. The life-cycle model is applied to panel data from Kyoto University’s bicycle share system. The errors between actual and estimated values are analysed to evaluate two model specifications. The findings help us understanding adaptation, “recovery” and drop-out behaviour. Later, by introducing some latent “Life Stages” into the lifecycle models, the model can deal better with time-heterogeneity in transition, leading to an improved description on user behaviour changes. Therefore, a total of five individual life-cycle stages are define; Birth, Growing, Maturity, Recession and Death. As the current stage of users can change over time, transition functions in different stages will further decide the state transitions within each stage. The model can be considered as a special case of Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model (HHMM). To estimate the latent variables and the transition functions, the Expectation- vi maximization (EM) algorithm is used. The extended lifecycle model is applied to panel data from Montreal`s Free Floating Car Sharing Service (FFcs). The results show that the model can fit the observed demand distribution curve in lifetime and real-time well. At the same time, an impact of facility extension (new service areas) on user behaviour is noticed, in that a higher drop out ratio but increased usage frequency at all stages is observed. It is also found that differences in behaviour exist between users with experience of using the prior existing station-based car sharing service (SBcs) and users without such experience. Experienced users have longer lifetime but also slower adaptation and lower usage frequency at the beginning. These findings help understanding impacts of other factors, such as previous experience and facility extension on initial trials, adaptation, maintaining, decline and drop-out behaviour. Finally, to further explore the usefulness and limitations of our methodologies, a combination of the adoption model and the user life-cycle model is conducted to forecast the demand dynamics of new transport system with the facility extension in case study Ha:mo. Keywords: Shared Mobility; Demand Evolution; Adoption and Diffusion; Stochastic Process; Lifecycle Model; vii viii Preface Papers published or submitted related to this thesis are listed in the following: I. Zhang, C.,Schmöcker, J.-D (2017). Modelling User Adaptation to a Campus Bicycle Share System. 96th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington DC, USA. (Chapter 5) II. Zhang, C.,Schmöcker, J. D. (2017). A Markovian model of user adaptation with case study of a shared bicycle scheme. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 1-14. (Chapter 5) III. Zhang, C., Schmöcker, J.-D (2019). Stochastic process based life-cycle modelling for user behavior changes. 98th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington DC, USA. (Chapter 6) IV. Zhang, C., Schmöcker, J.-D, Toshiyuki Nakamura, Masahiro Kuwahara. (2017), Modeling adoption and diffusion of new transportation system in station level, Autumn Conference of Committee of Infrastructure Planning and Management, Morioka, Japan. (Chapter 4) V. Zhang, C., Schmöcker, J.-D, Toshiyuki Nakamura, Nobuhiro Uno, Masahiro Kuwahara (2018). Modeling temporal and spatial differences in the adoption of new transport systems, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (under review) (Chapter 4) ix x Table of Contents _Toc534923292 Acknowledgments ......................................................................................... iii Abstract ........................................................................................................... v Preface ........................................................................................................... ix Table of Contents ........................................................................................... xi List of Tables................................................................................................. xv List of Figures ............................................................................................. xvii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................. 1 1.1. Background ............................................................................... 1 1.2. Research Objective .................................................................... 2 1.3. Outline and
Recommended publications
  • City-Bike Maintenance and Availability
    Project Number: 44-JSD-DPC3 City-Bike Maintenance and Availability An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Michael DiDonato Stephen Herbert Disha Vachhani Date: May 6, 2002 Professor James Demetry, Advisor Abstract This report analyzes the Copenhagen City-Bike Program and addresses the availability problems. We depict the inner workings of the program and its problems, focusing on possible causes. We include analyses of public bicycle systems throughout the world and the design rationale behind them. Our report also examines the technology underlying “smart-bike” systems, comparing the advantages and costs relative to coin deposit bikes. We conclude with recommendations on possible allocation of the City Bike Foundation’s resources to increase the quality of service to the community, while improving the publicity received by the city of Copenhagen. 1 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following for making this project successful. First, we thank WPI and the Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Division for providing off- campus project sites. By organizing this Copenhagen project, Tom Thomsen and Peder Pedersen provided us with unique personal experiences of culture and local customs. Our advisor, James Demetry, helped us considerably throughout the project. His suggestions gave us the motivation and encouragement to make this project successful and enjoyable. We thank Kent Ljungquist for guiding us through the preliminary research and proposal processes and Paul Davis who, during a weekly visit, gave us a new perspective on our objectives. We appreciate all the help that our liaison, Jens Pedersen, and the Danish Cyclist Federation provided for us during our eight weeks in Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycle Schemes
    Division 44 Water, Energy and Transport Recommended Reading and Links on Public Bicycle Schemes September 2010 Reading List on Public Bicycle Schemes Preface Various cities around the world are trying methods to encourage bicycling as a sustainable transport mode. Among those methods in encouraging cycling implementing public bicycle schemes is one. The public bicycle schemes are also known as bicycle sharing systems, community bicycling schemes etc., The main idea of a public bicycle system is that the user need not own a bicycle but still gain the advantages of bicycling by renting a bicycle provided by the scheme for a nominal fee or for free of charge (as in some cities). Most of these schemes enable people to realize one way trips, because the users needn’t to return the bicycles to the origin, which will avoid unnecessary travel. Public bicycle schemes provide not only convenience for trips in the communities, they can also be a good addition to the public transport system. Encouraging public bike systems have shown that there can be numerous short that could be made by a bicycle instead of using motorised modes. Public bike schemes also encourage creative designs in bikes and also in the operational mechanisms. The current document is one of the several efforts of GTZ-Sustainable Urban Transport Project to bring to the policymakers an easy to access list of available material on Public Bike Schemes (PBS) which can be used in their everyday work. The document aims to list out some influential and informative resources that highlight the importance of PBS in cities and how the existing situation could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for Vehicle Sharing in Charleston, South Carolina
    Feasibility Study for Vehicle Sharing in Charleston, South Carolina Janet Li City of Charleston Department of Planning, Preservation & Sustainability August 26, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 5 FEASIBILITY IN CHARLESTON .......................................................................................................... 7 DENSITY AND SETTING ................................................................................................................................. 7 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ..................................................................................................................... 7 DRIVING ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................ 10 BICYCLING ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................ 23 DEMOGRAPHICS ............................................................................................................................................ 32 BEST PRACTICES ................................................................................................................................. 36 BICYCLE SHARING ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Bike Rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft
    Transdanube.Pearls - Network for Sustainable Mobility along the Danube http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Guideline for bike rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft WP/Action 3.1 Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Version/Date 3.0, 23.11.2017 Document Revision/Approval Version Date Status Date Status 3.0 23/11/2017 Final draft xx.xx.xxxx final Contacts Coordinator: Bratislava Self-governing Region Sabinovská 16, P.O. Box 106 820 05 Bratislava web: www.region-bsk.sk Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Ľubľanská 1 831 02 Bratislava web: http://ipp.szm.com More information about Transdanube.Pearls project are available at www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Page 2 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Abbreviations BSS Bike Sharing Scheme ECF European Cyclists´ Federation POI Point of Interest PT Public Transport Page 3 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Table of content Contacts ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bike Rental ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Execuive summary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Best practice examples from across
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Bicycle Options for Federal Lands: Bike Sharing, Rentals and Employee Fleets
    FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 JANUARY 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS Technical Report published by Technology Deployment Program Western Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 For more information or additional copies contact: Susan Law, Planning Team Leader [email protected], 360.619.7840 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rebecca Gleason, Laurie Miskimins 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Western Transportation Institute P.O. Box 174250 11. Contract or Grant No. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report Western Federal Lands Highway Division August 2009 – July 2011 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 14. Sponsoring Agency Code HFL-17 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Susan Law – FHWA CFLHD/WFLHD. Advisory Panel Members: Adam Schildge – FTA, Alan Turnbull – NPS RTCA, Andrew Duvall, National Science Foundation IGERT PhD student, Brandon Jutz – FWS, Candace Rutt – CDC, Diana Allen – NPS RTCA, Franz Gimmler – non-motorized consultant, Ivan Levin – Outdoor Foundation, Jane D. Wargo – HHS, Jason Martz – NPS, Jim Evans – NPS, Nathan Caldwell – FWS, Paul DeMaio – Bike Share consultant, Tokey Boswell – NPS. This project was funded by the Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge Road Program.
    [Show full text]
  • How Infrastructures Can Promote Cycling in Mediterranean Cities
    Title: How infrastructures can promote cycling in cities: Lessons from Sevilla. Keywords: Bicycling. Cycling infrastructure. Active mobility. Sustainable transport. Sevilla (Seville). Spain. Europe. Corresponding Author: Dr. Ricardo Marques, Full Professor Corresponding Author's Institution: Universidad de Sevilla Corresponding Author's postal address and contact: Sistema Integral de la Bicicleta de la Universidad de Sevilla (SIBUS) Vicerrectorado de Infraestructuras, Universidad de Sevilla Pabellón de Brasil, Paseo de las Delicias s/n 41012 Sevilla – Spain Phone: (34)954550961, Cell phone: (34)665534446 E-mail: [email protected] First Author: Ricardo Marques, Full Professor Authors: Ricardo Marques. Full Professor. SIBUS - University of Sevilla. Spain. E-mail: [email protected] Vicente Hernandez-Herrador. Student. SIBUS - University of Sevilla. Spain E-mail: [email protected] Manuel Calvo-Salazar. Mobility consultant. Sevilla. Spain. E-mail: [email protected] Jose-Antonio García-Cebrián. Urban manager. E-mail: [email protected] Order of authors: Marqués, R., Hernández-Herrador, V., Calvo-Salazar, M., and García-Cebrián, J. A. ABSTRACT In this paper we analyze the development of a separated cycling infrastructure in Sevilla during the period 2006 – 2011, as well as its consequences for the city mobility. The development in such a short period of time of a fully segregated network of cycle paths has proven to be a valuable tool for the promotion of bicycle mobility in a city without previous tradition of utilitarian cycling. Besides segregation from motorized traffic, connectivity, continuity, visibility, uniformity, bi- directionality and comfort have proven to be good criteria for the design of such infrastructure. All these criteria are aimed to make cycling not just safe, but also easy and comfortable for everybody.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Public and Private Bicycle Use: the Case of Seville
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Castillo-Manzano, José I.; Castro-Nuño, Mercedes; Lopez-Valpuesta, Lourdes Conference Paper The relationship between public and private bicycle use: the case of Seville 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places", 25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Castillo-Manzano, José I.; Castro-Nuño, Mercedes; Lopez-Valpuesta, Lourdes (2015) : The relationship between public and private bicycle use: the case of Seville, 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places", 25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/124610 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • European Best Practices in Bike Sharing Systems
    Grant EIE/07/239/SI2466287 T.aT. - Students Today, Citizens Tomorrow REPORT European Best Practices in Bike Sharing Systems National Report Coordinator: Panos Antoniades Local Mobility Coordinator: Andreas Chrysanthou June 2009 Grant EIE/07/239/SI2466287 Index Index________________________________________________________________ 2 1. Introduction ______________________________________________________ 3 2. Bike Sharing System _______________________________________________ 7 3. Overview of bike share systems elements ______________________________ 9 4. Types of Bike Sharing System_______________________________________ 12 4.1. Unregulated________________________________________________________ 13 4.2. Deposit ___________________________________________________________ 13 4.3. Membership _______________________________________________________ 13 4.3.1. Public-private partnership ___________________________________________ 13 4.4. Long-term checkout _________________________________________________ 14 4.5. Partnership with railway sector ________________________________________ 14 4.6. Partnership with car park operators ____________________________________ 15 5. Evolution of Bike Sharing System ___________________________________ 15 6. Operations ______________________________________________________ 17 7. European best practises____________________________________________ 21 8. Conclutions _____________________________________________________ 51 9. References ______________________________________________________ 54 2 T.aT. – Students
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling Scotland INTERNATIONAL COMPARATOR STUDY Final Report November 2015 CYCLING SCOTLAND - INTERNATIONAL COMPARATOR STUDY FINAL REPORT
    Cycling Scotland INTERNATIONAL COMPARATOR STUDY Final Report November 2015 CYCLING SCOTLAND - INTERNATIONAL COMPARATOR STUDY FINAL REPORT TEAM: URBAN MOVEMENT EUROPEAN CYCLISTS’ FEDERATION PROJECT DIRECTOR: JOHN DALES, Urban Movement DATE: NOVEMBER 2015 PRESENTED BY URBAN MOVEMENT with ECF STATUS FINAL REPORT ISSUE NO. DATE ISSUED NOVEMBER 2015 AUTHOR JOHN DALES APPROVED BY DIRECTOR JOHN DALES © 2015 Urban Movement Ltd. All rights reserved This document has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Urban Movement Limited, no other party may copy, reproduce, distribute, make use of, or rely on its contents. No liability is accepted by Urban Movement Limited for any use of this document, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in this document are on the basis of Urban Movement Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Urban Movement Limited has been made. CYCLING SCOTLAND INTERNATIONAL COMPARATOR STUDY - FINAL REPORT 2 10180 CONTENTS 00 INTRODUCTION 4 01 EFFECTS - Evidence of Change 6 • Netherlands • Denmark • Germany • Spain • Austria 02 CAUSES - Evidence of Policy + Action 44 • Netherlands • Denmark • Germany • Spain • Austria 03 COMMON TRENDS 72 04 LESSONS for Scotland 74 + APPENDIX Reference
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycles
    EuroTest http://www.eurotestmobility.com/eurotest.php?itemno=418&la... MEMBERS log in newsletter drivers home | news | EuroTests | downloads | co EuroTests - EuroTest 2012 - Public Bicycles Back to list Results Back to Public Bicycles test Click here to view the overall ranking of the 40 systems Bikes-to-go are looking pretty good Almost all of the 40 public bicycle hire schemes in this first-time comparison of schemes in cities throughout Europe offer their bikes at permanent rental stations in their area. But that's were the similarities end. With such a diverse range of offers, differences in quality have to be expected. This becomes obvious as soon as we look at the number of stations where bikes can be picked up. This ranges from just a single station in the case of BUGA in Aveiro, Portugal, to 1,751 in the case of Vélib' in Paris. France's capital also holds the record for the number of bicycles: 23,900. Compared to second-place Barclay's Cycle Hire in London with its 558 stations and 9,200 bicycles, we can see just how impressive this record is. And the winner is: France But still, Paris, which is certainly setting an example for the rest of the world, only received a "Good" rating and came second in this European comparison. The capital city was nipped at the post by fellow countryman vélo'v in Lyon, the only scheme to receive a "Very good" rating. 343 stations with 4,000 bicycles, available to anyone all year round, linked to local public transport, easy and free registration, fully automated bicycle pick-up and return at any station, information provided in several languages and accessible in many different ways - that's pretty close to the perfect bike-to-go system.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society Organisations Advancing Cycling
    Civil Society Organisations Advancing Cycling Reflections on the Bicycle Partnership Program Experiences| Interface for cycling expertise The role of CSO’s in the implementation of public bicycle systems February 2011 Authors Jeroen Buis Zé Lobo Reviewers Tom Godefrooij Irene Frieling Interface for Cycling Expertise [email protected] 26 | Interface for Cycling Expertise | 333 The role of CSO’s in the implementation of public bicycle systems 3.1 Introduction 3.1.13.1.13.1.1 About this essay This essay is about public bicycle systems and the role that civil society organisations (CSOs) can play in the set up and management of these systems. In the past decade urban public bicycle systems have mushroomed around the globe as a successful form of non%motorised public transport. Dozens of systems have been implemented in Europe, but their popularity has recently also spread to North%America, South%America and Asia. In this essay, special attention will be paid to public bicycle systems in developing countries; a very new and interesting phenomenon. This essay is of interest for those who want to understand more about public bicycle systems in general and about public bicycle systems in developing countries and the possible role of CSOs in the process, in particular. The essay should also be of interest to policy makers in cities which consider implementing a public bicycle system and to CSOs that want to push the issue. In most cases public bicycle systems are implemented by a company which works together with the local authority. In some cases however, civil society organisations, in most cases organisations representing certain groups of urban cyclists, have played a role in the development, implementation and for promotion of these systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Share Technology White Paper
    Bikeshare Technology White Paper A Comparative Guide to the Different Technologies Offered by Bikesharing Vendors Tucker Gaegauf A2B Bikeshare June 25, 2014 [email protected] Abstract: Technology in the bikeshare industry has developed rapidly over the past few years, achieving greater levels of scalability, flexibility, and affordability. Keeping up with these technological developments, however, is no easy task. This paper offers a comprehensive overview of how bikeshare technology has developed, what the current technology is, and how bikeshare technology projects to develop in the future. To better understand the roots of bikesharing and the challenges that come with bikesharing, a historical background of the different generations of bikesharing is offered. Later, this paper analyzes how the current capabilities of third generation “smart-dock” systems compare to the capabilities of recently developed fourth generation “smart-bike” systems. Finally, this paper explores the newest potential development in the bikeshare market, namely the introduction of “smart-lock” technology, though challenges remain for this technology to be a viable option for municipalities. The bikeshare hardware and software providers analyzed in this report are “smart-dock” providers B-Cycle, Smoove/CycleHop, Alta/8D Technologies, DecoBike, “smart-bike” providers A2B Bikeshare and Social Bicycles (SoBi), and “smart-lock” providers Lock8 and BitLock. Table of Contents 1. Introduction...............................................................................................1
    [Show full text]