A Chasm Between Two Vanguards: Near Encounters of Russian Emigre Marxists and Dadaism in Switzerland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Chasm Between Two Vanguards: Near Encounters of Russian Emigre Marxists and Dadaism in Switzerland Swiss American Historical Society Review Volume 53 Number 1 Article 3 2-2017 A Chasm Between Two Vanguards: Near Encounters of Russian Emigre Marxists and Dadaism in Switzerland Bryan K. Herman Doctoral Candidate, History Department, University at Albany Axel Fair-Schulz Department of History, State University of New York College at Potsdam Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review Part of the European History Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Herman, Bryan K. and Fair-Schulz, Axel (2017) "A Chasm Between Two Vanguards: Near Encounters of Russian Emigre Marxists and Dadaism in Switzerland," Swiss American Historical Society Review: Vol. 53 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review/vol53/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Swiss American Historical Society Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Herman and Fair-Schulz: A Chasm Between Two Vanguards A Chasm Between Two Vanguards: Near Encounters of Russian Emigre Marxists and Dadaism in Switzerland by Bryan K. Herman Doctoral Candidate, History Department, University at Albany and Axel Fair-Schulz Department of History, State University of New York College at Potsdam In the year 1916, Switzerland was an island of peace in a sea of belligerence. Surrounded by Germany, France, and Italy, Switzerland was one of the few European counties to maintain its neutrality during the war that transformed Europe into a graveyard. It also became an ideal sanctuary for those who opposed the brutality and strident nationalism of World War I. Ever since the defeat of the 1905 Revolution in Russia, Switzerland had acted as an ideal place of refuge for members of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party (the RSDLP, a Marxist party founded in 1898). This party sought to overthrow the Russian autocracy and further the cause of an internationalist revolution based upon Marxist principles of creating a society where "the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all." 1 1 Already in 1848, Marx and Engels define their Communist goals in the following fa shion: " In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all." Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party , Frederick Engels, trans. and ed. (Chicago, Ill.: Charles H. Kerr & Company, 1906), p. 47. Published by BYU ScholarsArchive, 2017 1 Swiss American Historical Society Review, Vol. 53 [2017], No. 1, Art. 3 2 February 2017 SAHS Review In 1903, this party split into two rival factions: the Bolshevik wing, calling for a tightly-organized structure based upon committed revolutionaries, and the Menshevik wing, seeking to work within the current system and not openly incite revolution .2 Although these were distinct currents within the party, the split was not final until 1912, and hence there was a much greater degree of fluidity compared to later periods. Devoted to the international workers' movement instead of jingoistic impulses, RSDLP members were appalled at the collapse of the Second International in 1914, when many members parted ways based upon national lines-thus betraying their own professed internationalist commitments and succumbing to nationalist and pro-war propaganda.3 Members following Vladimir Il'ich Lenin's Bolshevik faction, within the RSDLP, waited for the time when this nationalist competition between warring nations would transform into a situation that could cause the proletariat to rise up and seize the reins of power, led by Lenin's own revolutionary vanguard. Not far away from Lenin and other members of the RSDLP in the Swiss city of Zurich, another vanguard of a very different sort emerged during the war. While abhorring the bloodshed of inner­ imperialist rivalry that exploded in World War I, some members of the RSDLP viewed war also as a springboard to revolution , another group of avant-garde artists, led by Tristan Tzara, rued war as the ultimate triumph of irrationality over the rational .4 Many trace the Dada Movement back to 1915 when Hugo Ball and Emily Hemmings experimented with anti-war performance in their Cabaret Voltaire 2 For a more complete discussion of the context of the Bolshevik-Menshevik split, see Lars Lih, Lenin Rediscovered: What ls to Be Done? In Context (Chicago, Ill.: Haymarket Books, 2008). 3 R. Graig Nation's War on War: Lenin, the Zimmerwald Left. and the Origins of Communist Internationalism (Chicago, Ill.: Haymarket Books, 2009) contextualizes how World War I divided the parties of the old Second International based on whether collaboration with, or resistance to , the war effort, was the best course of action . The Bolsheviks were among the few socialist organizations that consistently and openly opposed the war. 4 Leah Dickerman , Dada: Zurich, Berlin, Hannover, Cologne, New York , Paris (Washington, D.C.: The National Gallery of Art and Distributed Art Publishers Inc. , 2005), pp. 2-7. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review/vol53/iss1/3 2 Herman and Fair-Schulz: A Chasm Between Two Vanguards A Chasm Between Two Vanguards 3 designed to shock the audience. It was only in February of 1916, when Dada began to coalesce as a coherent artistic movement, that Ball and Hemmings invited artists like Tristan Tzara, Richard Huelsenbeck, and Hans Richter to join their group. Tzara's role was particularly important in shifting Dada into a cohesive movement that used printed media instead of just performance art. From Zurich, Dada spread to several other major cities like Berlin, Paris, and New York.5 ln a world that seemed to be falling apart about them, Tzara and other followers of the art movement that would later become Dadaism concluded that the world that surrounded them was filled with absurdity and brutality and that Modern Art called for something new to reflect these trends. After the war, inspired by Bolshevik techniques of agitation, Dadaism would even produce works of art that meant to shock as a sort of artistic engagement. Although the purpose of Dada from the beginning had been to disorient its audience, in cities like Berlin and Cologne many of the leading Dada artists were actually members of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), particularly at the high­ water mark of 1920. Berlin artists, like George Grosz and John Heartfield, waged battles over whether or not it was necessary to protect works of high culture during a revolution, especially since the Dadaists took a stance that valued human life over works of art.6 They wrote pamphlets linking Dadaism with Communism and created art designed to confront the sensibilities of their audience.7 Indeed, Tzara identified as a Soviet sympathizer well into the late 1940s, at a time 5 Marc Dachy, The Dada Movement /915-1923 (New York, N.Y.: Skira/Rizzoli , I 990), p. 33. For the early years of Dadaism in Zurich, also see Dickerman, pp. I 9-35 . 6 Brigid Doherty, "The Work of Art and the Problem of Politics in Berlin Dada" Oc!ober l 05 (Summer 2003), pp. 73-92. Compare with Anatol ii Lunacharsky's fears of works of art being destroyed in Russia during the October Revolution of 1917. See Sheila Fitzpatrick , The Commissariat of Enlightenmenl: Soviet Organization of Education and !h e Aris under Lunacharsky October 1917-1921 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970) , pp. 13- 14. 7 Georges Hugnet, "The Dada Spirit in Painting" in The Dada Painters and Poets: An Anthology, Robert Motherwell, ed . 2nd ed. (Boston, MA: G . K. Hall & Co., 1981), pp. 147-53 , 156-57 . Also see in the same volume Richard Huelsenbeck, "En Avant Dada: A History of Dadaism (1920)" ibid. , pp. 41 -42. Published by BYU ScholarsArchive, 2017 3 Swiss American Historical Society Review, Vol. 53 [2017], No. 1, Art. 3 4 February 2017 SAHS Review when the Soviet art scene was starkly di ssimilar to Dadaism .8 A little after the heyday of Dadaism, leading French Surrealists, such as the poets Andre Breton, Louis Aragon , Benjamin Peret, and Paul Eluard, gravitated towards Marxism and even joined the French Communist Party (PCF), seeing their aesthetic, philosophical, and political commitments to Dada-inspired Surrealism and Marxism-Leninism as mutually complementary. Hence, the French and German Communist parties, at various points of the 1920s, embraced Dada and Surrealist artists. It seems vogue in certain quarters of educated popular opinion to suggest a natural affinity between Bolshevism and Dadaism. After all, both Dadaism and Bolshevism developed in order to contest the world of capitalist exploitation and alienation, imperialist wars, rampant racism and colonialism; in short, the status quo and those complicit with it. Some of this perceived affinity goes all the way back to the movement itself. The Dada artist Hans Richter made one of the few observations of the nearby Russian Bolsheviks. He quipped that the authorities in Zurich "were far more suspicious of the Dadaists, who were liable to pull off some unexpected stunt at any moment, than of those quiet, scholarly Russians." 9 Even in the 1920s, Hitler tended to consider modernist trends in art, like Dadaism, under the pejorative term "Bolshevik Art." 10 One of the few books that deals directly with Lenin and Dadaism is a satirical volume, Dominique Noguez's Lenin Dada: Essai. This tongue-in-cheek French book follows up one absurd hypothesis with another, all accompanied with extensive footnotes that provide only circumstantial support for the book's assertions, as it claims that "dada" originated from Lenin calling out "yes, yes" (in Russian: da , 8 Robert Motherwell ed., The Dada Painters and Poets: An Anthology, Robert Motherwell , ed.
Recommended publications
  • J. Stalin August 1930
    W O R K E R S O F A L L C O U N T R I E S, U N I T E ! From Marx to Mao M L © Digital Reprints 2006 RUSSIAN EDITION PUBLISHED BY DECISION OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION (BOLSHEVIKS) П pолеma puu вcex cm paн, coeдuняйmecь! ИНCTИTУT МАРKCА — ЭНГЕ ЛЬCА — ЛЕ НИНА пpи ЦK ВKП(б) n.b. CTAlnH СОчИНEНИя О Г И З ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ ИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВО ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ М o c к в a • 1 9 4 9 J. V. S TA L I N FROM MARX w o R k s TO MAO VOLUME ¡£ JULY !(#) _ JANUARY !(#$ NOT FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRIBUTION E FOREIGN LANGUAGES PUBLISHING HOUSE M o s c o w • 1 9 5 4 C O N T E N T S FROM MARX TO MAO Page Preface .................. XIII REPLY TO THE DISCUSSION ON THE POLITICAL REPORT OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE TO THE SIXTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE C.P.S.U.(B.), July 2, 1930 ............... 1 LETTER TO COMRADE SHATUNOVSKY ...... 18 LETTERS TO COMRADENOT CH. FOR......... 21 TO COMRADE DEMYAN BEDNY. (Excerpts from a Letter) 24 ANTI-SEMITISM. Reply to an Inquiry of the Jewish News Agency in theCOMMERCIAL United States ..........30 THE TASKS OF BUSINESS EXECUTIVES. Speech Deliv- ered at the First All-Union Conference of Leading Person- nel of SocialistDISTRIBUTION Industry, February 4, 1931 ....31 LETTER TO COMRADE ETCHIN .........45 GREETINGS TO THE STAFFS OF AZNEFT AND GROZ- NEFT .................47 TO ELEKTROZAVOD .............48 MAGNITOGORSK IRON AND STEEL WORKS PROJECT, MAGNITOGORSK .............49 TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF THE ALL- UNION CENTRE OF MACHINE AND TRACTOR STATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Through the Eyes of the Tagores: Travelogues of Rabindranath and Saumyendranath
    Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities (ISSN 0975-2935) Indexed by Web of Science, Scopus, DOAJ, ERIHPLUS Themed Issue on “India and Travel Narratives” (Vol. 12, No. 3, 2020) Guest-edited by: Ms. Somdatta Mandal, PhD Full Text: http://rupkatha.com/V12/n3/v12n322.pdf DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n3.22 Russia through the Eyes of the Tagores: Travelogues of Rabindranath and Saumyendranath Sajal Dey Department of Russian Studies, the English and Foreign Languages University, Shillong Campus, Umshing-Mawkynroh, Shillong, Meghalaya, India. Email: [email protected] Abstract Two Tagores, two visionaries; one as a poet-educationist, another as a revolutionary-politician, both from colonial India, then reeling under the British yoke, visited Russia at about the same time. While the elder Tagore, Nobel-laureate Rabindranath, was moved by the huge scale of development, mainly on the educational front, -- the younger and the more rebellious one, Soumyendranath, studied deeply, paused, and raised questions, debated and disputed the gap between the so-called socialist theory and practice in Soviet Russia. Rabindranath wanted to visit post-revolution Russia for quite some time. After a few futile attempts his desire was ultimately fulfilled in 1930. What he primarily wanted to see was the all-embracing spread of education in the Soviet system and its results. His Russiar Chithi, or Letters from Russia bears testimony to his impression of the new ‘awakened’ Russia. In the very first line of his first letter from Moscow he writes, “In Russia at last! Whichever way I look, I am filled with wonder.” In spite of a few adverse comments that he made later on, this feeling of ‘wonder’ about Russia lasted throughout the collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Russians Abroad-Gotovo.Indd
    Russians abRoad Literary and Cultural Politics of diaspora (1919-1939) The Real Twentieth Century Series Editor – Thomas Seifrid (University of Southern California) Russians abRoad Literary and Cultural Politics of diaspora (1919-1939) GReta n. sLobin edited by Katerina Clark, nancy Condee, dan slobin, and Mark slobin Boston 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: The bibliographic data for this title is available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-61811-214-9 (cloth) ISBN 978-1-61811-215-6 (electronic) Cover illustration by A. Remizov from "Teatr," Center for Russian Culture, Amherst College. Cover design by Ivan Grave. Published by Academic Studies Press in 2013. 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. The open access publication of this volume is made possible by: This open access publication is part of a project supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book initiative, which includes the open access release of several Academic Studies Press volumes. To view more titles available as free ebooks and to learn more about this project, please visit borderlinesfoundation.org/open. Published by Academic Studies Press 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Table of Contents Foreword by Galin Tihanov .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archiefexemplaar !!! Niet Meenemen !!! 53
    RUSSIAN BIZNES IN THE NETHERLANDS Dina Siegel Willem Pompe Institute University of Utrecht May 2002 ARCHIEFEXEMPLAAR !!! NIET MEENEMEN !!! 53 RUSSIAN BIZNES IN THE NETHERLANDS Dina Siegel Contents Acknowledgements 6 Introduction 7 Dutch media 9 Police reports 10 Scientific reports 11 Present study 12 Chapter 1. Purposes of research and theoretical background 15 1.a The cultural approach 15 1.b Russian organised crime as a study of community 19 1.c 'Mafia', 'Russian Mafia' and other generalizations 21 1.d The research methods 23 Organised crime as empirical study 23 Field work among Russian-speakers in the Netherlands 24 Lies and gossip 26 Chapter 2. From Stenka Razin to Yaponchik — historical development of Russian organised crime 29 2.a History of Russian Organized crime 29 2.a.1 Crime and criminal in Russia in Tsarist times 31 2.a.2 Urban criminals 33 2.a.3 Organised Crime in the Soviet period and its perception in Soviet culture..... 34 Revolutionaries 34 Nomenklatura 37 Underground millionaires 38 Economic criminals — crime for survival 39 Vory v zakone (thieves in law) 41 2.a.4 New Russians and the development of organised crime in the post-Gorbachev period Nomenklatura and KGB 45 New Entrepreneurs 46 Vory v zakone 47 2.b The Present Situation 49 2.b.1 Numbers and size 50 2.b.2 Economic function 50 2.b.3 Structure and organization 51 2.b.4 Geographical location 51 1 2.b.5 Main criminal organizations, activities and crime bosses in the post-Socialist Russia (1990 — 2000) 52 Solntsevskaya 52 Podolskaya 53 Pushlcinskaya 53 21 st Century Association 53 Kurganskaya 54 Other criminal organizations from Moscow 54 Tambovskaya 55 Kazanskaya 55 Brigade of Haritonov 55 2.b.6 Multi-ethnic post-Soviet Mafia 56 Ethnicity as an old problem in the Soviet Union 56 Ethnic criminality in theoretical perspective 57 Stereotypes and racism 58 Ethnic violence 58 Theory and practice 60 Chechens 60 Georgians 61 Azeris 62 Armenians 62 Latvians..
    [Show full text]
  • Collected Works of VI Lenin
    W O R K E R S O F A L L C O U N T R I E S , U N I T E! L E N I N COLLECTED WORKS 43 A THE RUSSIAN EDITION WAS PRINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A DECISION OF THE NINTH CONGRESS OF THE R.C.P.(B.) AND THE SECOND CONGRESS OF SOVIETS OF THE U.S.S.R. ИНCTИTУT МАРÇCИзМА — ЛЕНИНИзМА пpи ЦK KНCC B. n. l d H n H С О Ч И Н E Н И Я И з д a н u е ч е m в е p m o e ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ ИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВО ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ M О С К В А V. I. L E N I N cOLLEcTED WORKS VOLUME 43 December 18o3 –October 1o17 PROGRESS PUBLISHERS MOSCOW TRANSLATED FROM THE RUSSIAN BY MARTIN PARKER AND BERNARD ISAACS From Marx to Mao M L © Digital Reprints 2014 www.marx2mao.com First printing 1969 Second printing 1971 Third printing 1977 10102—212 л беэ объявл. 014 (01)—77 7 C O N T E N T S Page Preface ........................ 29 1893 1. TO P. P. MASLOV. Second half of December ....... 37 1894 2. TO P. P. MASLOV. May 30 .............. 39 3. TO P. P. MASLOV. May 31 .............. 42 4. TO L. F. MILOVIDOVA. July ?1 ............ 42 1900 5. TO Y. M. STEKLOV. September ? 5 ........... 44 6. TO D. B. RYAZANOV. September ? 5 .......... 45 7. TO V. P. NOGIN. October 10 ............. 45 8. TO Y. M. STEKLOV. October 10 ............ 46 9. TO APOLLINARIA YAKUBOVA. October ?6 ........ 47 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Revolution: Soviet Propaganda Posters from Between the World Wars September 24, 2017–February 11, 2018
    Constructing Revolution: Soviet Propaganda Posters from between the World Wars September 24, 2017–February 11, 2018 Bowdoin College Museum of Art OSHER GALLERY Constructing Revolution: Soviet Propaganda Posters from between the World Wars Constructing Revolution explores the remarkable and wide-ranging body of propaganda posters as an artistic consequence of the 1917 Russian Revolution. Marking its centennial, this exhibition delves into a relatively short-lived era of unprecedented experimentation and utopian idealism, which produced some of the most iconic images in the history of graphic design. The eruption of the First World War, the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917, and the subsequent civil war broke down established political and social structures and brought an end to the Tsarist Empire. Russia was split into antagonistic worlds: the Bolsheviks and the enemy, the proletariat and the exploiters, the collective and the private, the future and the past. The deft manipulation of public opinion was integral to the violent class struggle. Having seized power in 1917, the Bolsheviks immediately recognized posters as a critical means to tout the Revolution’s triumph and ensure its spread. Posters supplied the new iconography, converting Communist aspirations into readily accessible, urgent, public art. This exhibition surveys genres and methods of early Soviet poster design and introduces the most prominent artists of the movement. Reflecting the turbulent and ultimately tragic history of Russia in the 1920s and 1930s, it charts the formative decades of the USSR and demonstrates the tight bond between Soviet art and ideology. All works in this exhibition are generously lent by Svetlana and Eric Silverman ’85, P’19.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Montage Cinema As Propaganda and Political Rhetoric
    Soviet Montage Cinema as Propaganda and Political Rhetoric Michael Russell Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2009 This thesis is dedicated to the memory of Professor Dietrich Scheunemann. ii Propaganda that stimulates thinking, in no matter what field, is useful to the cause of the oppressed. Bertolt Brecht, 1935. iii Abstract Most previous studies of Soviet montage cinema have concentrated on its aesthetic and technical aspects; however, montage cinema was essentially a rhetoric rather than an aesthetic of cinema. This thesis presents a com- parative study of the leading montage film-makers – Kuleshov, Pudovkin, Eisenstein and Vertov – comparing and contrasting the differing methods by which they used cinema to exert a rhetorical effect on the spectator for the purposes of political propaganda. The definitions of propaganda in general use in the study of Soviet montage cinema are too narrowly restrictive and a more nuanced definition is clearly needed. Furthermore, the role of the spectator in constituting the rhetorical effectivity of a montage film has been neglected; a psychoanalytic model of the way in which the filmic text can trigger a change in the spectator’s psyche is required. Moreover, the ideology of the Soviet montage films is generally assumed to exist only in their content, whereas in classical cinema ideology also operates at the level of the enunciation of the filmic text itself. The extent to which this is also true for Soviet montage cinema should be investigated. I have analysed the interaction between montage films and their specta- tors from multiple perspectives, using several distinct but complementary theoretical approaches, including recent theories of propaganda, a psycho- analytic model of rhetoric, Lacanian psychoanalysis and the theory of the system of the suture, and Peircean semiotics.
    [Show full text]
  • Days with Lenin
    V58,21yM70 G2 009534 - I . - .:1'~· • . .~ :---;:v ~ { . ~ " .;~ . -~ . : ·. ... DAYS ITH LENIN by Maxim Gorky MARTIN LAWRENCE, LTD. LONDON ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PRINTED IN THE U, S. A. This book i; composed and printed by union labor. DAYS WITH LENIN BY MAxiM GoRKY VLADIMIR LENIN is dead. That in him the world has lost a surpassing genius, one far greater than any of his great contempo.r:ar!es, even some of his enemies have · had the courage to admit. The following words form the conclusion of an article on Lenin, which appeared in the Prager Tageblatt, a German bourgeois newspaper published in Czechoslovakia-an article whose domi­ nant note is one of· awe and reverence for his colossal figure: "Great and terrible and beyond our compre­ hension, even in death-such is Lenin.'' It is clear that the feeling behind this article is not one of mere gloat­ ing, not the feeling which finds cynical expression in the saying that "the corpse of an enemy always smells good,; neither is it the feeling of relief which comes from the departure of a great but restless spirit. It is unmistakably the pride of humanity in a great man.. The Russian emigre press had neither the moral cour­ age nor the good taste to express, on the occasion of Lenin's death, the respect which the bourgeois papers showed in appreciating the personality of a man whose\ life was one of the greatest examples of fearless reason · and resolute will to live. · It would be a difficult task to paint the portrait of Vladimir Ilyitch • Lenin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Literature of New Russia Previous Efforts for the Betterment of the Tional Action
    Page Six DAILY WORKER, NEW YORK, SATURDAY. MARCH 9, 1929 “U. S. By Rushes Arms and Ammunition Across Border” (News Item) Fred Ellis MM M Copyright, 1919, by International JBaily iiliJ&nrkpr m M J M J Publishers Co., Inc. Central Organ of the Workers (Communist) Party Published by the National Daily SUBSCRIPTION RATES: Worker Publishing Association, By (ln on : HAYWOOD’S Mail New Tork iy) Inc., Daily, Except Sunday, at (8.00 a vear ?4.50 six months Square. 26-28 Union New York, ,50 three months All rights reserved. Republican I ) / 1 / \ / N. Y., Telephone, Stuyvesant , , .. I 1696-7-8. Cable: “DAIWORK.” / d N except by permission. M 5b.00a 3. }vircai i?-nfo.i)0 sixr, months lion forbidden f I I $2.00 ______ three months ROBERT MINOR Editor Address and mail all checks to Ihe Daily Worker, 26-28 Union SVM. F. DUNNE Ass. Editor Square, New York, N. Y. What a Labor Union Should Be, as Stated by the in Industrial Union Manifesto at the Communists Lead Strikes Birth of the I. W. W. Bombay; Reformists Aid Boss In previous chapters Haywood told his early life as miner, present strike Bombay, of The of ..demonstrations before the mills and cowboy and homesteader in the Old West; of years as member of the. India, mill workers which the Brit- -: parades through the city caused a Miners; of finally being elected to head the gradual closing Western Federation of ish government tried toturn into a i of themills. In a W.F.M.; its battles in Idaho and Colorado; of the conference at.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and References
    Notes and References 'M.' means the place of publication was Moscow; 'L.' that it was Leningrad; 'M.-L.' that the work was published in both cities. 1 THE REVOLUTION 1. The origins of this notion are contested. R. Pipes, 'Intelligentsia from the German Intelligenz'?: A Note' Slavic Review, 1971 (3) pp. 615-18, advances the claim for 'die Intelligenz', used in German from 1849. This had been noted by L. B. Namier, 1848: The Revolution of the Intellectu­ als (London, 1944) p. 22. It had certainly been used in Poland at the beginning of the 1840s, see Andrzej Walicki, A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism (Oxford, 1980) p. xv, note 3. However, another Polish scholar suggests the term entered Russian vocabulary, with Belinsky, in 1846: see: A. Gella, 'The Life and Death of the Old Polish Intelligentsia', Slavic Review, 1971 (3) p. 4. During the nineteenth century, of course, the term covered a great variety of political and social tendencies: populist, radical, liberal, anarchist and revolutionary. For a twentieth-century appraisal of the evolution of the concept see Karl Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia 'The Sociological Problem of the Intelligentsia' (n. date, first published 1936) pp. 153--63. In the post-war Russian context, L. G. Churchward, The Soviet Intel­ ligentsia (London, 1973) pp. 1--6. 2. W. H. Chamberlain, The Russian Revolution, 1917-1921, vol. 1 (Cam­ bridge, Mass., 1935) p. 109. 3. K. D. Muratova, M. Gor'kii v bor'be za razvitiye sovetskoi literatury (M.-L. 1958) pp. 27-8. 4. Literaturnoye nasledstvo vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Writings of Leon Trotsky Is a Col­
    13.95 El. 65 WUHIil'HiU LE0I1 TROTSKY [1932] WRITlnliS OF LEon THUTSHY [1932] Writings of Leon Trotsky is a col­ lection, in twelve volumes, of pam­ phlets, articles, letters, and interviews written during Trotsky's third and final exile (1929-1940). They include many articles translated into English for the first time. They do not include the books and pamphlets from this period that are permanently in print, nor most of the unpublished material in the Trotsky Archives at Harvard University Library. WRITIOIiS OF LEon 'HOISHY [1932] PATHFINDER PRESS, INC. NEW YORK This volume is dedicated to EVELYN REED and GEORGE NOVACK Copyright CD 1973 by Pathfinder Press, Inc. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 73-81674 Manufactured in the United States of America Edited by George Breitman and Sarah Lovell First Edition, 1973 PATHFINDER PRESS, INC. 410 West Street New York, N. Y. 10014 CONTENTS Preface 9 Chronology 12 The "Uprising" of November 7, 1927 (January 2, 1932) 15 A Letter to the Politburo (January 4, 1932) 18 The Left Opposition and the Right Opposition (Published January 1932) 21 Internal Polemics and the Party Press (January 5, 1932) 24 Reply to the Jewish Group in the Communist League of France (January 15, 1932) 26 No Deal with German Government (January 23, 1932) 31 Is Stalin Weakening or the Soviets? (January 1932) 32 For Collaboration Despite Differences (February 10, 1932) 44 Answers to Questions by the New York Times (February 15, 1932) 45 From a Letter to Simon and Schuster (February 26, 1932) 51 Interview by the Associated
    [Show full text]
  • Pushkin and the Doctrine of Stalinism
    Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 11 (2014 7) 1879-1885 ~ ~ ~ УДК 659.4 Pushkin and the Doctrine of Stalinism Anatolii S. Il’in* Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University 90 Mira, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia Received 16.06.2014, received in revised form 17.07.2014, accepted 31.08.2014 There is an opinion that public relations were formed in the USA in the 1930-s and appeared in Russia only in the 1990-s, along with market economy and democracy. This opinion is not completely true. Indeed, public relations as art and science were formed in the USA. However, communication between the authorities and public (government relations) is traditionally considered to be the communicative function of any state body. A public event or a campaign is often used as a message conveyed through a communication channel. In the 1930-s in the USSR Joseph Stalin was building his regime by repressions, accusing his opponents of political crimes. But his regime needed a more solid reason. That is why Stalin ideologists used the centennial anniversary of the death of Alexander Pushkin: during the commemoration campaign, the doctrine of world revolution was replaced with the doctrine of building socialism in the only country which served as the ideological foundation of the Red Empire. Keywords: public relations, communications, A.S. Pushkin, ideology doctrine. Research area: History. Monument contest; the work on the monument lasted for five Russian authorities persecuted the poet more years. while he was alive and greatly honoured him The monument opening was held on three times after his death.
    [Show full text]