DOCSLIB.ORG

171 Abdülkerimzade Mehmed, 171 Abdullah Bin Mercan, 171

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
171 Abdülkerimzade Mehmed, 171 Abdullah Bin Mercan, 171 Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17716-1 — Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire Abdurrahman Atçıl Index More Information Index Abdülkerim (Vizeli), 171 AliFenari(FenariAlisi),66 Abdülkerimzade Mehmed, 171 ʿAli bin Abi Talib (fourth caliph), 88 Abdullah bin Mercan, 171 Ali Ku¸sçu, 65, 66, 77n77 Abdülvahhab bin Abdülkerim, 101 Al-Malik al-Muʾayyad (Mamluk ruler), Abdurrahman bin Seydi Ali, 157, 42 157n40 Altıncızade (Mehmed II’s physician), Abdurrahman Cami, 64 80 Abu Bakr (irst caliph), 94 Amasya, 127n37, 177 Abu Hanifa, 11 joint teaching and jurist position in, ahi organization, 22 197 Ahizade Yusuf, 100 judgeship of, 79n84 Ahmed, Prince (Bayezid II’s son), 86, Anatolian principalities, 1, 20, 21, 22, 87 23n22, 24n26, 25, 26, 28, 36, 44, Ahmed Bey Madrasa, 159 64 Ahmed Bican (Sui writer), 56 Ankara, 25, 115, 178 Ahmed Pasha (governor of Egypt), 123 battle of, 25, 54 Ahmed Pasha bin Hızır Bey. See Müfti joint teaching and jurist position in, Ahmed Pasha 197 Ahmed Pasha bin Veliyyüddin, 80 Arab Hekim (Mehmed II’s physician), Ahmed Pasha Madrasa (Alasonya), 80 161 Arab lands, 19, 36, 42, 50, 106, Ahmedi (poet), 34 110n83, 119, 142, 201, 202, ʿAʾisha (Prophet’s wife), 94 221 Akkoyunlus, 65, 66 A¸sık Çelebi, 10 Ak¸semseddin, 51, 61 A¸sıkpa¸sazade, 38, 67, 91 Alaeddin Ali bin Yusuf Fenari, 70n43, Ataullah Acemi, 66, 80 76 Atayi, Nevizade, 11, 140, 140n21, Alaeddin Esved, 33, 39 140n22, 194, 200 Alaeddin Pasha (Osman’s vizier), 40 Hadaʾiq al-Haqaʾiq, 11, 206 Alaeddin Tusi, 42, 60n5, 68n39, 81 Ayasofya Madrasa, 60, 65, 71, 72, Albania, 50, 86n9 111n85, 148, 149, 182n42, 196 Aleppo, 153, 154, 165, 204 Aydınids, 21, 25, 35, 43 joint teaching and jurist position in, Ayn Jalut, the battle of, 19 197 Azerbaijan, 17, 32, 65 judgeship of, 182n42, 201, 204, 205, 206, 208, 211 Baba Zünnun, 123 Alexander the Great, 55, 56, 120 Babek Çelebi, 100 Ali bin Bali, 10 Baghdad, 17, 27, 64, 122, 122n15 Ali Cemali, 92 judgeship of, 182n42, 201, 206, 207, Ali Ekber (author of Hıtayname), 93, 211 93n32 Bahauddin Ömer bin Kutbuddin, 38 251 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17716-1 — Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire Abdurrahman Atçıl Index More Information 252 Index Baki (poet), 185 Çandarlı Halil Pasha, 24, 38, 40, 51, Balkans, 1, 25, 26, 57n35, 130n43, 97n47 212, 221 Çandarlı Ibrahim˙ Pasha, 40, 97n47 Bayezid I, 21, 24n26, 25, 29, 30, 32, Çandarlı Kara Halil Pasha, 39, 40 34, 38, 39, 42 Celaleddin Devvani, 64, 111n85 sons of, 25, 34, 54 Celalzade Mustafa Çelebi, 74, 162 Bayezid II, 12, 50, 52, 52n16, 53n18, Cem Sultan, 50, 53n18, 85, 85n4, 86, 54, 68, 69, 74, 77, 78, 79, 83, 85, 86n9 86, 91, 92, 97, 98, 98n47, 101, Cezeri, Muhammed (Ibn al-Jazari), 103, 104, 111n85, 114, 115, 135, 21n16, 34, 42 149, 156 chancellor, 7, 72, 78, 79, 101, 124, endowment policy of, 91 146n3, 210 enthronement of, 85, 86n9, 87 Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, 56, Bayezid II Madrasa (Amasya), 98, 100, 120, 121 182n42 Charles VIII (king of France), 85n4 Bayezid II Madrasa (Edirne), 98, 100, chief judgeship (kadıaskerlik), 39, 101, 149, 150, 182n42 39n50, 69, 71, 72, 76, 76n75, 77, Bayezid II Madrasa (Istanbul), 98, 100 78, 98, 127, 133, 134, 135, 136, Belgrade, 87, 105, 106, 119 138, 141, 167, 168, 171, 182, 191, Bezzazi, Hafızuddin Muhammed, 35 192, 199, 201, 224 Bilecik, 33, 38 of Anatolia, 139, 141, 184, 202, 208 Birgizade Mustafa, 101 of Arab and Acem lands, 202 Bithynia, 1 of Rumeli, 9, 139, 165, 184, 186, Bosnia, 1530 law code of, 96 189, 208 Bostan Mustafa Efendi, 135n6, chief jurist. Seeseyhülislam, ¸ ofice of 138n12, 172, 180 China, 1n1, 17, 93 Budin, 164 Ming dynasty, 3n5, 93 Bukhara, 64 Chinggis Khan, 17 Bulgarian kingdom, 25, 28 Chinggisid lineage, 18 Burak, Guy, 221 Çivizade Mehmed bin Ilyas,˙ 140, 170, Burhaneddin Haydar Herevi, 34, 37, 172, 203n34 38 Çorlu, 163, 176 Bursa, 30, 34, 36, 42, 63, 69, 80, 81, Crimean khans, 50, 109 100, 127, 134, 146, 177, 178, 200, Cürcani, SeyyidSerif, ¸ 34, 82, 82n98, 223, 224 173n10 judgeship of, 38, 39n45, 42, 69, 78, Cyprus, 197 98, 99, 100, 134, 182, 201, 203, judgeship of, 197 205, 211 Byzantine Empire, 2, 28, 49, 51, 59 dahil, 71, 72, 134, 134n1, 152, 177, 195, 196, 197, 197n16, 198, 223 Cairo, 19, 21, 34, 64, 202 Damascus, 33, 34, 64, 153, 154, 178, judgeship of, 201, 203, 204, 205, 221 211 joint teaching and jurist position in, Çaldıran, battle of, 122 197 caliphate, 18, 19, 129, 129n42 judgeship of, 182n42, 201, 203, 204, end of Abbasid, 17, 27 205, 206, 211 transfer of, 129n42 Darulhadis Madrasa (Edirne), 31, 151 Canberdi Gazali, 87n14, 90, 123, Darulhadis Madrasa, Süleymaniye 204n38 (Istanbul), 148 Çandarlı Ali Pasha, 39, 40 Davud Pasha Madrasa, 171 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17716-1 — Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire Abdurrahman Atçıl Index More Information Index 253 Davudi Kayseri, 33 England, 3 decree of 1598, 142, 143, 184, 185, Evrenos Bey Madrasa, 159 217 Eyüp, 61, 61n10 Devletoglu˘ Yusuf, 31n8 judgeship of, 163 dignitary scholar-bureaucrats. See mevali Fahreddin Acemi, 34, 38, 42, 80 Dimetoka, 193 Fazlullah Pasha (Murad II’s vizier), Divan-ı Hümayun. See Imperial 40 Council Fenarizade Hasan Pasha (Murad II’s Diyarbakır, 110n83, 154, 202 vizier), 40 Dulkadiroglu˘ principality, 111n85 Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria, 120, Dursun Fakih, 33, 37, 38 123 Ferhadiya Madrasa (Bursa), 99 Ebu Eyyüb el-Ensari, 61 Ferruh Halife, 171 Ebulfazl Defteri, 101 FethullahSirvani, ¸ 64 Ebussuud, 130n43, 136n8, 140, 141, fetret devri (interregnum period), 25 141n23, 171, 172, 182, 183, 184, irearms, use of, 2, 2n2, 26 185 Firuzabadi, Mecdüddin, 34 son-in-law of, AbdülkadirSeyhi, ¸ Fleischer, Cornell H., 53n19, 73, 130 168n92, 184 France, 2, 85 son-in-law of, Malulzade Mehmed, Fudayl Çelebi, 168n92, 207n56, 208, 184 209 son of, Mehmed, 183, 184n53 Fusus al-Hikam. See IbnʿArabi son of, Mustafa, 184n53, 193 ecnebi (outsider), 140, 140n21, 143, Galata, judgeship of, 163, 197, 209 144 Gallipoli, judgeship of, 79, 197 Edebali, 33, 37, 38 gayr-i sahih vakf (invalid endowment). Edirne, 30, 36, 37, 63, 69, 126, 127, See irsadi vakf 134, 146, 149, 157, 177, 178, 200, Gedik Ahmed Pasha, 79, 86n9 223, 224 George of Trabzon, 56 judgeship of, 38, 69, 78, 98, 100, Germiyanid principality, 25 101, 134, 182, 201, 203, 205, 209, ghazis (holy warriors), 21, 21n18, 27, 211 42, 52, 95 Egypt, 19, 32, 33, 34, 42, 50, 57n35, 64, 90, 106, 107, 110, 112, 113, Habsburgs, 120, 122, 123, 124, 119, 125, 129n42, 142, 165 124n23, 214, 215 1525 law code of, 96 Hacıhasanzade Mehmed, 79, 135n6, governor of, 90, 123 179n34 Ekmeleddin Baberti, 34, 42 Hadım Ali Pasha, 86 Emir¸sah Kadı Madrasa (Yeni¸sehir), Hafızı Acem, 98, 99, 111n85 160 Hafsa Sultan, 165 endower, 43, 61, 67, 132, 155, 157, Hagia Sophia. See Ayasofya Madrasa 226 Halebi Madrasa (Edirne), 31, 34, 37, endowment, 8, 28, 30, 37n35, 39n45, 112 43, 44, 61, 61n7, 61n8, 61n10, 62, Hankah Madrasa, 151, 152 63, 63n17, 67, 68, 68n37, 91, 92, Hanzade Fatıma Sultan, 158 99, 100, 107, 108, 109, 132, 145, haric, 71, 134, 134n1, 137, 152, 177, 146, 146n4, 147, 148, 150, 151, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 152n22, 153, 154, 155–168, 213, 196n16, 197, 223 223, 225, 226 Hasan Samsuni, 80 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17716-1 — Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire Abdurrahman Atçıl Index More Information 254 Index Haseki Madrasa, 150, 151, 152, Iraq, 17, 34, 50, 142 182n42, 196 irsadi vakf (endowment of Hashiya al-Tajrid, madrasas of, 173 supervision), 61, 61n7, 62 Hatibzade Muhyiddin, 80, 114 Isa˙ Bey Madrasa, 193n10 Hatice Sultan Madrasa, 151, 152 Ishak˙ Pasha, 37, 63 HayaliSemseddin ¸ Ahmed, 76 Ismail˙ Bey (Kastamonu’s ruler), 43, 44 Haydar (leader of the Safavid order), Ismihan˙ Sultan Madrasa, 151 88 Isparta, 37 Hayır Bey (governor of Egypt), 90 Israilzade,˙ 170, 204n39 Hayreddin bin Evhad, 182 Istanbul, 10, 12, 35, 44, 52, 56, 59, 61, Hekimzade Muhyiddin, 155 62, 63, 65, 66, 72, 81, 86, 87, 90, Herat, 66 92, 95, 111, 123, 125, 126, 127, Hezargrad, 158 134, 146, 152, 153, 160, 177, 178, Hıtayname. See Ali Ekber 223, 224 Hızır Bey, 35, 35n27, 39 judgeship of, 69, 78, 98, 100, 134, HızırSah, ¸ 37n35, 42 182, 201, 203, 205, 211 Hoca Hayreddin, 80, 82n98, 184 the conquest of, 2, 12, 27, 49, 50, Hocazade Muslihuddin, 60n5, 75, 51, 53, 54, 55, 59, 61, 61n8, 62, 79n84, 80, 81, 82 66, 69, 70, 212 Hospitallers, 50 Italy, 86n9 Hülegü, 17 Izmir,˙ judgeship of, 197 Hungary, 50, 122, 123 Iznik,˙ 30, 33, 39, 69, 76, 177 Hürrem Sultan, 126, 150 judgeship of, 38, 79n84 Hürrem Sultan Madrasa. See Haseki Iznik˙ Madrasa, 151, 152 Madrasa Hüsrev Bey Madrasa (Sarajevo), 165 janissaries, 24, 26, 49, 53n18, 86, Hüsrev Pasha, 154 86n9, 87, 125, 218 Hüsrev Pasha Madrasa (Aleppo), 154, John Zapolya, king of Hungary, 122 165 judge of the Arabs (kadı’l-arab), 202 Hüsrev Pasha Madrasa (Diyarbakır), 154 Kabusname. See Mercimek Ahmed Kadı Mahmud, 38 IbnʿArabi, 33 kadıaskerlik. See chief judgeship Ibn Battuta, 8, 23n22 Kadızade Ahmed ¸Semseddin,165n78, Ibn˙ Kemal. See Kemalpa¸sazade 171 Ibrahim˙ Pasha (Grand Vizier), 54, Kafadar, Cemal, 23 79n84, 87, 120, 130 Kafescioglu,˘ Çigdem,˘ 60 içil, 72, 134, 177, 178 kalemiye (inancial and scribal career), Idrisi˙ Bidlisi, 97 7, 57, 72, 73, 79, 98, 101, 115, Ihsano˙ glu,˘ Ekmeleddin, 173n8 131, 175, 215, 223 Ilkhanate Empire, 17 Kalenderhane Madrasa, 151 ilmiye (Ottoman learned Kalenderoglu,˘ 123 establishment), 6, 7, 131, 215, 223 Kamil Mehmed Pasha, 101 Imperial Council, 53n17, 53n18, 54, kanunname.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Study of Muslim Economic Thinking in the 11Th A.H
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive A study of Muslim economic thinking in the 11th A.H. / 17th C.E. century Islahi, Abdul Azim Islamic Economics Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, KSA 2009 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75431/ MPRA Paper No. 75431, posted 06 Dec 2016 02:55 UTC Abdul Azim Islahi Islamic Economics Research Center King Abdulaziz University Scientific Publising Centre King Abdulaziz University P.O. Box 80200, Jeddah, 21589 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia FOREWORD There are numerous works on the history of Islamic economic thought. But almost all researches come to an end in 9th AH/15th CE century. We hardly find a reference to the economic ideas of Muslim scholars who lived in the 16th or 17th century, in works dealing with the history of Islamic economic thought. The period after the 9th/15th century remained largely unexplored. Dr. Islahi has ventured to investigate the periods after the 9th/15th century. He has already completed a study on Muslim economic thinking and institutions in the 10th/16th century (2009). In the mean time, he carried out the study on Muslim economic thinking during the 11th/17th century, which is now in your hand. As the author would like to note, it is only a sketch of the economic ideas in the period under study and a research initiative. It covers the sources available in Arabic, with a focus on the heartland of Islam. There is a need to explore Muslim economic ideas in works written in Persian, Turkish and other languages, as the importance of these languages increased in later periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3
    Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire by Emrah Safa Gürkan
    Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire by Emrah Safa Gürkan The relationship between the Ottomans and the Christians did not evolve around continuous hostility and conflict, as is generally assumed. The Ottomans employed Christians extensively, used Western know-how and technology, and en- couraged European merchants to trade in the Levant. On the state level, too, what dictated international diplomacy was not the religious factors, but rather rational strategies that were the results of carefully calculated priorities, for in- stance, several alliances between the Ottomans and the Christian states. All this cooperation blurred the cultural bound- aries and facilitated the flow of people, ideas, technologies and goods from one civilization to another. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Christians in the Service of the Ottomans 3. Ottoman Alliances with the Christian States 4. Conclusion 5. Appendix 1. Sources 2. Bibliography 3. Notes Citation Introduction Cooperation between the Ottomans and various Christian groups and individuals started as early as the beginning of the 14th century, when the Ottoman state itself emerged. The Ottomans, although a Muslim polity, did not hesitate to cooperate with Christians for practical reasons. Nevertheless, the misreading of the Ghaza (Holy War) literature1 and the consequent romanticization of the Ottomans' struggle in carrying the banner of Islam conceal the true nature of rela- tions between Muslims and Christians. Rather than an inevitable conflict, what prevailed was cooperation in which cul- tural, ethnic, and religious boundaries seemed to disappear. Ÿ1 The Ottomans came into contact and allied themselves with Christians on two levels. Firstly, Christian allies of the Ot- tomans were individuals; the Ottomans employed a number of Christians in their service, mostly, but not always, after they had converted.
    [Show full text]
  • Portable Archaeology”: Pashas from the Dalmatian Hinterland As Cultural Mediators
    Chapter 10 Connectivity, Mobility, and Mediterranean “Portable Archaeology”: Pashas from the Dalmatian Hinterland as Cultural Mediators Gülru Necipoğlu Considering the mobility of persons and stones is one way to reflect upon how movable or portable seemingly stationary archaeological sites might be. Dalmatia, here viewed as a center of gravity between East and West, was cen- tral for the global vision of Ottoman imperial ambitions, which peaked during the 16th century. Constituting a fluid “border zone” caught between the fluctu- ating boundaries of three early modern empires—Ottoman, Venetian, and Austrian Habsburg—the Dalmatian coast of today’s Croatia and its hinterland occupied a vital position in the geopolitical imagination of the sultans. The Ottoman aspiration to reunite the fragmented former territories of the Roman Empire once again brought the eastern Adriatic littoral within the orbit of a tri-continental empire, comprising the interconnected arena of the Balkans, Crimea, Anatolia, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and North Africa. It is important to pay particular attention to how sites can “travel” through texts, drawings, prints, objects, travelogues, and oral descriptions. To that list should be added “traveling” stones (spolia) and the subjective medium of memory, with its transformative powers, as vehicles for the transmission of architectural knowledge and visual culture. I refer to the memories of travelers, merchants, architects, and ambassadors who crossed borders, as well as to Ottoman pashas originating from Dalmatia and its hinterland, with their extraordinary mobility within the promotion system of a vast eastern Mediterranean empire. To these pashas, circulating from one provincial post to another was a prerequisite for eventually rising to the highest ranks of vizier and grand vizier at the Imperial Council in the capital Istanbul, also called Ḳosṭanṭiniyye (Constantinople).
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Memory and Mythification: Relocation of Suleymani Tribes on the Northern Ottoman–Iranian Frontier
    Middle Eastern Studies ISSN: 0026-3206 (Print) 1743-7881 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fmes20 Migration, memory and mythification: relocation of Suleymani tribes on the northern Ottoman–Iranian frontier Erdal Çiftçi To cite this article: Erdal Çiftçi (2018) Migration, memory and mythification: relocation of Suleymani tribes on the northern Ottoman–Iranian frontier, Middle Eastern Studies, 54:2, 270-288, DOI: 10.1080/00263206.2017.1393623 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2017.1393623 Published online: 06 Nov 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 361 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fmes20 MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES, 2018 VOL. 54, NO. 2, 270–288 https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2017.1393623 Migration, memory and mythification: relocation of Suleymani tribes on the northern Ottoman–Iranian frontier Erdal Cift¸ ci¸ a,b aHistory Department, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey; bHistory Department, Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Turkey Although some researchers have studied the relationship between hereditary Kurdish emirs and the Ottoman central government, there has been little discussion of the role played by Kurdish tribes, and Kurdish tribes in general have been omitted from scholars’ narratives. Researchers have mostly discussed how Idris-i Bidlisi became an intermediary between the Ottoman central government and the disinherited Kurdish emirs, some of whom had been removed from power by the Safavids. In this article, we will not focus on the condominium between the Ottoman central government and the Kurdish emirs, but rather, we will draw attention to the roles played by the Kurdish tribes – specifically, the role played by the Suleymani tribes during the period dominated by local political upheaval in the sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall of Constantinople] Pmunc 2018 ​ ​ Contents
    [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ CONTENTS Letter from the Chair and CD………....…………………………………………....[3] Committee Description…………………………………………………………….[4] The Siege of Constantinople: Introduction………………………………………………………….……. [5] Sailing to Byzantium: A Brief History……...………....……………………...[6] Current Status………………………………………………………………[9] Keywords………………………………………………………………….[12] Questions for Consideration……………………………………………….[14] Character List…………………...………………………………………….[15] Citations……..…………………...………………………………………...[23] 2 [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ LETTER FROM THE CHAIR Dear delegates, Welcome to PMUNC! My name is Atakan Baltaci, and I’m super excited to conquer a city! I will be your chair for the Fall of Constantinople Committee at PMUNC 2018. We have gathered the mightiest commanders, the most cunning statesmen and the most renowned scholars the Ottoman Empire has ever seen to achieve the toughest of goals: conquering Constantinople. This Sultan is clever and more than eager, but he is also young and wants your advice. Let’s see what comes of this! Sincerely, Atakan Baltaci Dear delegates, Hello and welcome to PMUNC! I am Kris Hristov and I will be your crisis director for the siege of Constantinople. I am pleased to say this will not be your typical committee as we will focus more on enacting more small directives, building up to the siege of Constantinople, which will require military mobilization, finding the funds for an invasion and the political will on the part of all delegates.. Sincerely, Kris Hristov 3 [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ COMMITTEE DESCRIPTION The year is 1451, and a 19 year old has re-ascended to the throne of the Ottoman Empire. Mehmed II is now assembling his Imperial Court for the grandest city of all: Constantinople! The Fall of Constantinople (affectionately called the Conquest of Istanbul by the Turks) was the capture of the Byzantine Empire's capital by the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Scholars and Ottoman Sunnitization in the Sixteenth Century 31 Helen Pfeifer
    Historicizing Sunni Islam in the Ottoman Empire, c. 1450–c. 1750 Islamic History and Civilization Studies and Texts Editorial Board Hinrich Biesterfeldt Sebastian Günther Honorary Editor Wadad Kadi volume 177 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ihc Historicizing Sunni Islam in the Ottoman Empire, c. 1450–c. 1750 Edited by Tijana Krstić Derin Terzioğlu LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. Cover illustration: “The Great Abu Sa’ud [Şeyhü’l-islām Ebū’s-suʿūd Efendi] Teaching Law,” Folio from a dīvān of Maḥmūd ‘Abd-al Bāqī (1526/7–1600), The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The image is available in Open Access at: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/447807 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Krstić, Tijana, editor. | Terzioğlu, Derin, 1969- editor. Title: Historicizing Sunni Islam in the Ottoman Empire, c. 1450–c. 1750 / edited by Tijana Krstić, Derin Terzioğlu. Description: Boston : Brill, 2020. | Series: Islamic history and civilization. studies and texts, 0929-2403 ; 177 | Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Documentation About Ottoman Heritage in Belgrade Via Digital Reconstruction of Sokollu Mehmed Pasha Caravanserai
    Vladimir BOŽİNOVİĆ, Viktor POPOVİĆ* ANALYSIS OF DOCUMENTATION ABOUT OTTOMAN HERITAGE IN BELGRADE VIA DIGITAL RECONSTRUCTION OF SOKOLLU MEHMED PASHA CARAVANSERAI This city as wonderful as a diamond in a ring was founded by one of the Serbian kings, King Despot. It was the conquest goal for all kings wrote in 1660 Evliya Çelebi. Abstract In the period from 16th to the end of the 17th century Belgrade became one of the most important cities of Ottoman Empire in the Balkans. During this era of peace Sultans and Grand Viziers erected numerous waqf endowments, which formed an enviable economic, educational and religious center. Most important Belgrade waqf was certainly the waqf of Grand Vizier Sokollu Mehmet Pasha. It consisted out of several buildings with the most famous one being vizier`s caravanserai, probably the biggest architectural complex of Ottoman Belgrade. In the following centuries, the city was constantly changing power and turmoil that followed many savage bat- tles resulted in destruction of famous caravanserai and many other monuments of Ottoman Bel- grade. The only testimony of these glorious objects that we have today is partial documentation scattered throughout museums and archives in Serbia and abroad. Modern means of recon- 1 struction of cultural heritage through analysis of available documentation reveal new possibili- * Felsefe Fakültesi, Belgrat- SIRBİSTAN. Balkanlarda Osmanlı Vakıfları ve Eserleri Uluslararası Sempozyumu / 341 ties for further study and presentation of Ottoman heritage in Belgrade. Now we can revitalize politicized or neglected historic heritage with virtual forms of presentation which would promote cultural tolerance and real identity reference of Belgrade. This approach will be discussed through the example of digital reconstruction of Sokollu Meh- met Pasha caravanserai.
    [Show full text]
  • Art-Sanat, 14(2020): 185–209
    Art-Sanat, 14(2020): 185–209 DOI: 10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0008 http://dergipark.gov.tr/iuarts Başvuru: 22.03.2019 Revizyon talebi: 06.11.2019 Art-Sanat Son revizyon teslimi: 11.06.2020 Kabul: 11.07.2020 ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESI / RESEARCH ARTICLE Üsküdar: Harem Kadınlarının Prestij Sahası* Üsküdar: Prestige Area of the Ottoman Court Women Murat Kalafat** Öz Türk Mimarisi içerisinde kurucu olarak kadınların varlığı Hun ve Göktürk dönemlerine kadar geri götürülebilmektedir. Bu durum ilerleyen dönemlerde süreklilik göstermekle birlikte, en yoğun yaşandığı çağ Osmanlı’nın “Klasik” dönemidir. Bu kurucu/bâni grubu, imparatorluğun çeşitli bölgelerinde isimlerini yaşatan mimarlık ürünleri yaptırmışlardır. Ancak başkent olması nedeniyle en görkemli anıtsal mimari örneklerin bulunduğu İstanbul ve özellikle Üsküdar’da belirli bir yoğunlaşma izlenebilmektedir. Üsküdar’daki geniş organizasyonlu ve anıtsal mimari örneklerin tamamına yakını, Valide Sultanlar başta olmak üzere Harem kadınları tarafından inşa ettirilmiştir. Ayrıca Üsküdar’da bulunan bu yapılar, hem organizasyon hem anıtsallık bağlamında, bânilerinin “prestij yapısı” olarak nitelendirilebilecek uygulamalardır. Bahsedilen yapılar haricinde sadece üç adet anıtsal mimari örnek erkek baniler tarafından inşa edilmiştir: Rum Mehmed Paşa Küliyesi, Şemsi Paşa Külliyesi ve Selimiye Külliyesi. Bu durumun sebeplerini anlamak için başvurulacak referanslar ise çevre koşullarda aranmalıdır. Çevre koşulların değerlendirilmesi, Üsküdar’ın bir kent olarak niteliklerini saptamak ve diğer bölgelere göre farklı olduğu noktaları ortaya koymakla mümkündür. Buna göre şehrin tarihi, coğrafi, siyasi ve demografik özellikleri analiz edilmelidir. Böylelikle Üsküdar’daki bu yoğunlaşmanın sebepleri hakkında bir yaklaşım geliştirilebilecektir. Anahtar Kelimeler Üsküdar, Mimari, Harem Kadınları, Prestij Sahası Abstract The existence of women as founders/patrons in Turkish Architecture can be dated back to Hun and Göktürk periods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architectural Projects of the Grandees of Mehmed Ii
    APPENDIX III THE ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTS OF THE GRANDEES OF MEHMED II In this Appendix there will be an attempt to examine the architectural projects of selected high officials who were Mahmud Pasha's contem­ poraries. These will be Zaganos Pasha, ishak Pasha, Rum Mehmed Pasha, Gedik Ahmed Pasha, Hass Murad Pasha and Karamani Meh­ med Pasha. All ofthese men became Grand Vezirs with the exception of Hass Murad Pasha, who died at a young age as Beylerbeyi of Rumeli. Four of them, Zaganos Pasha, Rum Mehmed Pasha, Gedik Ahmed Pasha and Hass Murad Pasha, were converts, while ishak Pasha and Karamani Mehmed Pasha were not. Zaganos Pasha I Zaganos Pasha's main architectural project was in Bahkesir, in Anato­ lia, where he spent time after his two exiles, upon Murad II's return to the throne in 1446 and upon his fall from grace in the reign of Mehmed II, probably in 1456.2 If we combine this information with the fact that Zaganos Pasha appears to have died in Bahkesir in AH 865 (1460-1461), where he was also buried, we may reach the conclu­ sion that he must have had his hass in that town. In Bahkesir Zaganos Pasha built a complex, which included a mosque, a soup kitchen and public baths.' as well as the founder's tomb, which bears the date AH 865 (1460-1461).4 The posthumous endowment deed for this complex is dated AH 866 (1461-1462). 5 He also constructed several buildings in Rumeli. An important contribution of Zaganos Pasha to Ottoman military architecture was his building of a part of Rumeli I For information on Zaganos Pasha see Chapter I.
    [Show full text]
  • 5989 Turcica 35 09 Reindl
    Hedda REINDL-KIEL 247 THE TRAGEDY OF POWER THE FATE OF GRAND VEZIRS ACCORDING TO THE MENAKIBNAME-I MAHMUD PA≤A-I VELI bhorrence of tyranny and bloodthirsty despotism is, according to A 1 Joseph von Hammer , a prominent leitmotiv in the anonymous Mena- kıbname-i Mahmud Pa≥a. Hammer remarks, though, that its text cannot serve as a historical source, but is rather a kind of coffeehouse literature (lowbrow narratives presented by a story teller). Following this verdict, scholars did not show any particular interest in the menakıb for a lengthy period, although the text was printed in Turkey in the second half of the 19th century2. In 1854 an edition (using the manuscript Dresden Cod. turc. 181 and one of the Berlin manuscripts) with a French translation appeared in Friedrich Heinrich Dieterici's Chrestomatie Ottomane3, but this served largely didactic purposes. Thus, the view of scholars did not change, and Franz Babinger remarked as late as 1927 in his Geschichts- schreiber der Osmanen that the menakıb were of no historical value4. In 1949, Halil Inalcık and Mevlûd Oguz introduced a newly-found “∞gazavat-ı Sultan Murad∞”, which contained at the end an incomplete Dr. Hedda REINDL-KIEL Seminar für Orientalische Sprachen, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Nassestr. 2 D-53113 Bonn, Germany. 1 Joseph von HAMMER, Geschichte des Osmanischen Reiches, vol. IX, Pest 1833 (reprint∞: Graz 1963), p. 238, no 116. 2 Niyazi Ahmed BANOGLU, Mahmud Pa≥a∞—∞Hayatı ve ≤ehadeti∞—(Camilerimiz ve Bâniler), Istanbul, 1970 (Gür Kitapevi), p. 8. 3 Berlin, p. 1-18 (Ottoman text), 63-81 (French translation).
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89867-6 — a History of the Ottoman Empire Douglas A
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89867-6 — A History of the Ottoman Empire Douglas A. Howard Index More Information Index “Bold text denotes reference to figure” Abbas (Shah), 121, 140, 148 Abu Ayyub al-Ansari, tomb of, 70, 90–91 Abbas Hilmi (Khedive), 311 Abu Hanifa, 114 Abbasids, 3, 27, 45, 92, 124, 149 tomb restored, 92 scholars, on end of the world, 53 Abu Taqiyya family, of Cairo, 155 Abd al-Kader al-Gilani, 92, 316 Abu’l-Ghazi Bahadur Khan, of Khiva, 265 Abdülaziz (Sultan), 227, 245, 247, 257–58, Abyssinia, 94 289 Aceh (Sumatra), 203 deposed, 270 Acre, 214, 233, 247 suicide of, 270, 280 Adana, 141, 287, 307 tour of Europe, 264, 266 and rail lines, 287, 307 Abdülhamid I (Sultan), 181, 222, 230–31 French occupation of, 309 Abdülhamid II (Sultan), 227, 270, 278–80, headquarters of Ibrahim at, 247 283–84, 296 in census, 282 and Armenian question, 292 massacre of Armenians in, 296–97 and census, 280 on hajj route, 201, 203 and Macedonian question, 294 Adana, 297 and public ritual, 287 Adana, province of concessions to revolutionaries, 295 cotton boom in, 286–87 deposed, 296 Aden educational reforms of, 287–88 Ottoman conquest of, 105 memoirs about, 280 Admiral of the Fleet, See Kapudan Pasha opposition to, 292–93 Adnan Abdülhak, 319 repression by, 292 Adrianople. See Edirne security apparatus of, 280 Adriatic Sea, 19, 74–76, 111, 155, 174, 186, 234 Abdullah Frères (photographers), 200, 288, 290 and Afro-Eurasian commerce, 74 Abdullah Frères (photographers), 10, 56, 200, Advice for kings genre, 71, 124–25, 150, 262 244 Aegean archipelago
    [Show full text]