Prince of Orange Yatsenyuk to Launch His Own Bloc As He Looks to Play Coalition Kingmaker in the Orange Civil War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prince of Orange Yatsenyuk to Launch His Own Bloc As He Looks to Play Coalition Kingmaker in the Orange Civil War Prince of Orange Yatsenyuk to launch his own bloc as he looks to play coalition kingmaker in the Orange civil war Taras Kuzio ollowing the collapse of the Orange former parliamentary speaker Arseniy Yatse- a nosedive from which he has never recov- coalition on 16 September it is nyuk will be looking to punch above their ered. As a result Ukrainian politics finds itself Fanybody’s guess what President Viktor weight as they play the role of kingmaker to in a somewhat irrational position with the Yushchenko’s strategy will be. After all, there a future coalition or, if elections are called, two political forces most likely to gain from has been little sign of strategy in the under- provide strength in numbers ahead of the elections (Yulia Tymoshenko’s BYUT bloc mining of the Yulia Tymoshenko government coming campaign. and the Party of Regions) not favouring pre- and it looks uncomfortably like there is no term elections while the political force most credible post-undermining strategy either. Who wants new elections? likely to lose ground (Our Ukraine) osten- Nevertheless, in the horse-trading that is Recent events have suggested a failure sibly supporting them. Our Ukraine leader currently dominating behind-the-scenes to learn the lessons of September 2005, Vyacheslav Kyrylenko, undoubtedly with developments in Kyiv a number of second- when the removal of the first Tymoshenko Bankova’s prodding, last week laid down a tier political leaders led by rising star and government sent the President’s ratings into set of tough conditions for Our Ukraine to : 20 www.businessukraine.com.ua POLITICS Prince of Orange Parliamentary kingmaker: Former VR Speaker Arseniy Yatsenyuk announced last week that he intends to create his own political party. Yatsenyuk’s popularity with an electorate tired of the same old faces could prove crucial if Ukraine is forced into another round of snap parliamentary elections : September 29-October 05, 2008 21 : re-join any coalition with BYUT, but there is from the Orange coalition was only supported Yushchenko’s name. Any national democratic little to suggest that they are in a position to by a slim majority of 39 deputies, just two parties seeking to support the bloc would be be issuing ultimatums. more than the bare minimum required. Five tasked to merge with Our Ukraine, something The President’s ratings are currently a frac- of the Our Ukraine/People’s Self-Defence which they had promised to do prior to the tion of Mrs. Tymoshenko’s, while his political bloc’s nine member parties did not support 2007 elections before baulking at losing party has only a sixth of the support of BYUT. the decision, including the two largest their party fiefdoms. Presumably the logic is In any new election Our Ukraine could actu- – former Foreign Minister Borys Tarasiuk’s that by adding Mr. Yushchenko’s name the ally find itself failing to make it past the 3% Rukh and Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko’s President’s 5% support would improve its threshold for entering a new parliament, People’s Self Defence. Lutsenko headed the election chances. with most pollsters giving the party 4% entire bloc going into the 2007 pre-term elec- As the Orange rivals play the percentages support, which is down from 14% in the 2007 tions. Rukh is currently negotiating to join ahead of any coming vote, the role of former elections. One would think that Our Ukraine’s BYUT to become its fourth party member. parliamentary speaker Arseniy Yatsenyuk 2% share of the ballot in the May Kyiv city Other defections may be imminent. could well be pivotal. Last week Mr. Yatse- hall elections and their consequent failure to nyuk announced his intention to create his enter the city council would have focused the Lytvyn and the chances own political party, confirming speculation attention of Bankova. Obviously it has not. of a new Orange coalition that he intends to take on a leadership role in Nor is support for the President within A new coalition will be difficult to establish any future coalition talks. As one of the few his dwindling political grouping a foregone because none of the issues that undermined relatively new faces in Ukrainian politics and conclusion. The withdrawal of Our Ukraine the old coalition have been effectively dealt at the still tender age of 34, Mr. Yatsenyuk is with. Demands made by the Tymoshenko widely regarded as the rising star of Ukrainian bloc including the removal of Viktor Baloga politics and his backing could prove invalu- from his post as presidential chief of staff able to the under-fire President. His decision have gone unheard, while Our Ukraine offi- to head up his own party is in keeping with cials have responded with their list of require- modern Ukrainian political tradition: the ments. One potential solution would be the position of parliamentary speaker has regu- construction of a wider coalition to include larly gone to the head of those who have held the Volodymyr Lytvyn bloc. If Mr. Lytvyn’s it, whether Ivan Pliushch, Oleksandr Moroz eponymous political force joins BYUT and Our or Volodymyr Lytvyn. In a mature democ- Ukraine in a new, wider Orange coalition this racy such as Britain it would be unthinkable Ukraine is left waiting would improve its cohesion by increasing the for the parliamentary speaker to launch his for the President’s previous slim majority of 228 to a comfortable political project, but in Ukraine it remains decision to either majority of 248 deputies. The Lytvyn bloc did standard practice. re-establish a larger not support the July vote of no confidence, Mr. Yatsenyuk is a Yushchenko loyalist but it also remained outside of coalition talks and the President is thought to see him Orange coalition with in late 2007 following the slim Orange victory as a worthy successor. The main potential BYUT and the Lytvyn in the September 2007 snap poll. sponsors and allies of the Yatsenyuk bloc bloc or, if he decides to Increasing the size of the coalition would would likely come from the notorious “Dear go for broke after the be to BYUT’s advantage but not to Bankova’s. Friends,” as the business wing of Our Ukraine thirty days allowed to The Lytvyn bloc’s additional 20 deputies are mockingly referred to. These big busi- establish a new coalition would curtail the Presidential Secretariat’s ness interests first entered politics in 2002 expires in mid October, ability to blackmail BYUT by threatening in the then newly created Our Ukraine party to disband parliament to withdraw the votes of the 10-15 United which was at the time headed by Viktor Yush- and call fresh elections. Centre party supporters who are regarded as chenko. These Dear Friends have not joined Both scenarios offer most loyal to the President. Mr. Baloga’s United Centre party and are little comfort to Presi- looking for an alternative political vehicle. Mr. The scramble for allies Yatsenyuk’s relatively untarnished reputation dent Yushchenko In the event of a decision by the President and reformist credentials could fit the bill. to disband parliament and call new elec- The presence of former speaker Mr. Yatse- tions, Mr. Yushchenko would be forced to nyuk may also help win over another former place his hopes in a motley array of untried speaker with his own kingmaker potential. political forces and awkward realignments. Many of Mr. Yushchenko’s Dear Friends, The President would likely reject the strategy such as National Bank chairman Petro pursued in the 2002, 2006 and 2007 elections Poroshenko, have had long-term ties to Mr. of establishing a bloc of pro-Yushchenko Lytvyn. Channel 5’s airing of rumours that Mr. parties. Instead, Our Ukraine, which is one of Poroshenko was one of the financiers of the the nine parties in the OU-PSD bloc, would Lytvyn bloc in last year’s elections led to the become the sole electoral vehicle bearing Mr. dismissal of a Channel 5 journalist. Mean- 22 www.businessukraine.com.ua while, Mr. Yushchenko’s personal gratitude Party of Regions would fit. Would they remain if undertaken by Mr. Yushchenko and terrible POLITICS to Mr. Lytvyn is related to his role as parlia- within the Party of Regions as a pro-Yush- if undertaken by Mrs. Tymoshenko? mentary speaker during the Orange Revolu- chenko ‘fifth column’ or would they become tion and in the round-table negotiations that natural members of the Yatsenyuk bloc where No sign of Orange armistice brokered a repeat second round and paved they would rub shoulders with the tradition- President Yushchenko has so far refused to the way for his presidency. The Yatsenuk and ally anti-Tymoshenko Dear Friends? heed BYUT’s demand to remove Mr. Baloga Lytvyn blocs would therefore be fairly logical National Security and Defence secretary because Mr. Yushchenko is convinced that centrist allies. Raisa Bohatyriova was expelled from the Party only Mr. Baloga can ensure he wins a second Another figure with little experience on of Regions on September 1 after she returned term. He has ignored the 72% of Ukrainians the national political stage is Kyiv Mayor from a visit to the US, suggesting that there who do not want him to stand in the 2010 Leonid Chernovetskiy, who could yet form a are also stresses within the famously united presidential election, while heeding the call third pillar of pro-Yushchenko support. Any party of the pro-Russian camp. Party of of 16% of Ukrainians who say he should. As Chernovetskiy bloc would aim to build on his Regions leader Viktor Yanukovych was said to the well-known Zerkalo Nedeli commentator success in using his position in Kyiv to win be personally offended by Mrs.
Recommended publications
  • Public Broadcasting in Ukraine
    РОЗДІЛ 1 ДЕРЖАВНЕ МОВЛЕННЯ: ВІД ПРОПАГАНДИ ДО АДМІНРЕСУРСУ Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: History of Creation and Challenges PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: HISTORY OF CREATION AND CHALLENGES IN UKRAINE: HISTORY OF CREATION PUBLIC BROADCASTING 1 2 Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: History of Creation and Challenges UDC 654.19 О 76 Production of this brochure was made possible with the financial support from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and the Government of Sweden. The content of the brochure is the sole responsibility of Detector Media NGO and does not necessarily reflect the po- sition of the National Endowment for Democracy, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, or the Government of Sweden. S.V. Ostapa, V.V. Miskyi, I.Ye. Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova. О 76 Public broadcasting in Ukraine: History of Creation and Challenges. — Kyiv: VIOL PRINTING HOUSE LLC, 2018. — 168 p. Fig. Media experts directly involved in the establishment of the Public Broadcasting in Ukraine reveal the history of the transformation of state broadcasters into the National Public Broadcasting Company of Ukraine. It was a path from advocating for the legislation necessary for the formation of a legal entity and its first steps. This brochure also describes the main challenges faced by the National Public Broadcasting Company of Ukraine at the end of the first two years of its operation.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Political Corruption in Ukraine
    NATIONAL SECURITY & DEFENCE π 7 (111) CONTENTS POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE: ACTORS, MANIFESTATIONS, 2009 PROBLEMS OF COUNTERING (Analytical Report) ................................................................................................... 2 Founded and published by: SECTION 1. POLITICAL CORRUPTION AS A PHENOMENON: APPROACHES TO DEFINITION ..................................................................3 SECTION 2. POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE: POTENTIAL ACTORS, AREAS, MANIFESTATIONS, TRENDS ...................................................................8 SECTION 3. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERING UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC & POLITICAL STUDIES POLITICAL CORRUPTION ......................................................................33 NAMED AFTER OLEXANDER RAZUMKOV SECTION 4. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS ......................................................... 40 ANNEX 1 FOREIGN ASSESSMENTS OF THE POLITICAL CORRUPTION Director General Anatoliy Rachok LEVEL IN UKRAINE (INTERNATIONAL CORRUPTION RATINGS) ............43 Editor-in-Chief Yevhen Shulha ANNEX 2 POLITICAL CORRUPTION: SPECIFICITY, SCALE AND WAYS Layout and design Oleksandr Shaptala OF COUNTERING IN EXPERT ASSESSMENTS ......................................44 Technical & computer support Volodymyr Kekuh ANNEX 3 POLITICAL CORRUPTION: SCALE AND WAYS OF COUNTERING IN PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS AND ASSESSMENTS ...................................49 This magazine is registered with the State Committee ARTICLE of Ukraine for Information Policy, POLITICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Presidential Election Result
    BULLETIN No. 21 (97) February 8, 2010 © PISM COMMENTARY Editors: Sławomir Dębski (Editor-in-Chief), Łukasz Adamski, Mateusz Gniazdowski, Beata Górka-Winter, Leszek Jesień, Agnieszka Kondek (Executive Editor), Łukasz Kulesa, Marek Madej, Ernest Wyciszkiewicz Ukraine’s Presidential Election Result Łukasz Adamski By securing a narrow majority of electoral support, Viktor Yanukovych triumphed over Yulia Tymoshenko in Ukraine’s presidential election. His contender may feel inclined to challenge the legitimacy of the vote, an effort in all probability doomed to failure. In the coming months Yanukovych is expected to oust Tymoshenko as Prime Minister and form a favouring government. With 48.95% of the popular vote, Yanukovych outdid rival Tymoshenko who scored slightly fewer votes, closing at 45.47%. The total of 4.4% of the ballots were cast against the two main contenders, thus giving the winner less than 50% of the votes. The insignificant difference in the number of ballots cast for each of the candidates may push Tymoshenko to seek an appeal requesting the courts to nullify the election result. In her election night address she failed to acknowledge Yanukovych’s victory. Even before the ballot her campaign team warned of Yanukovych’s fraudulent plans and advertised irregularities in the elections statute. What may underlie the potential attempt to undermine the election result will not be the desire for the ballot to be run again (a scenario having little chances of success in light of positive appraisal of the vote by monitoring teams) but rather the hope to persuade Yanukovych and his Party of Regions to seek compromise with the PM currently in office.
    [Show full text]
  • October 12, 2012 His Excellency Viktor Yanukovych President Of
    CAREY R. DUNNE PRESIDENT Phone: (212) 382-6700 Fax: (212) 768-8116 [email protected] October 12, 2012 His Excellency Viktor Yanukovych President of Ukraine Administration of the President of Ukraine 11 Bankova Str., Kyiv 01220 Ukraine His Excellency Volodymyr Lytvyn Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Vul. M. Hrusthevskoho 5 01008, Kyiv, Ukraine Dear President Yanukovych and Chairman Lytvyn: I write on behalf of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York (the “Association”) to express our condemnation of Draft Law No. 8711 passed by the Verkhovna Rada on October 2, 2012 (the “Draft Law”) and currently scheduled for a second reading on October 16, 2012.1 In the Association’s view, the Draft Law threatens the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (“LGBT”) and Ukrainian individuals and organizations that support LGBT rights. Moreover, because the explanatory note to the Draft Law claims that the “promotion” of homosexuality is tied to the spread of HIV/AIDS,2 the Draft Law not only will stigmatize the Ukrainian LGBT community but also will hamper rather than help public health efforts with regard to HIV/AIDS. Furthermore, the Association strongly disagrees with the notion that this law would protect 1 See Website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, “The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted as a basis the bill to amend several legislative acts of Ukraine (re protection of children’s right to safe information space),” available at http://portal.rada.gov.ua/rada/control/en/publish/article/info_left?art_id=319722&cat_id=105995.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Political Crisis and U.S. Policy Issues
    Order Code RL32691 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Ukraine’s Political Crisis and U.S. Policy Issues Updated February 1, 2005 Steven Woehrel Specialist in European Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Ukraine’s Political Crisis and U.S. Policy Issues Summary In 2004, many observers believed that Ukraine was at a key period in its transition that could shape its geopolitical orientation for years to come, in part due to presidential elections held on October 31, November 21, and December 26, 2004. In their view, Ukraine could move closer to integration in Euro-Atlantic institutions, real democracy and the rule of law, and a genuine free market economy, or it could move toward a Russian sphere of influence with “managed democracy” and an oligarchic economy. For the past decade, Ukraine’s political scene had been dominated by President Leonid Kuchma and the oligarchic “clans” (regionally based groups of powerful politicians and businessmen) that have supported him. The oligarchs chose Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych as their candidate to succeed Kuchma as President. The chief opposition candidate, former Prime Minister Viktor Yushchenko, was a pro-reform, pro-Western figure seen by many observers as a man of high personal integrity. International observers criticized the election campaign and the first and second rounds of the election as not free and fair, citing such factors as government-run media bias in favor of Yanukovych, abuse of absentee ballots, barring of opposition representatives from electoral commissions, and inaccurate voter lists. Nevertheless, Yushchenko topped the first round of the vote on October 31 by a razor-thin margin over Yanukovych.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Election in Ukraine Implications for the Ukrainian Transition Presidential Election in Ukraine Implications for the Ukrainian Transition
    Helmut Kurth/Iris Kempe (Ed.) PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN UKRAINE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UKRAINIAN TRANSITION PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN UKRAINE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UKRAINIAN TRANSITION KIEV – 2004 The following texts are preliminary versions. Necessary corrections and updates will be undertaken once the results of the election process are final. These preliminary versions are not for quotation or citation, and may only be used with the express written consent of the authors. CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................. 5 Timm Beichelt/Rostyslav Pavlenko Presidential Election and Constitutional Reforms in Ukraine ............................................................................ 7 Olaf Hillenbrand Consensus-Building and Good Governance – a Framework for Democratic Transition ........................... 44 Oleksandr Dergachov Formation of Democratic Consensus and Good Governance ....................................................... 71 Oleksandr Sushko/Oles Lisnychuk The 2004 Presidential Campaign as a Sign of Political Evolution in Ukraine....................................... 87 Iris Kempe/Iryna Solonenko International Orientation and Foreign Support of the Presidential Elections ............................................ 107 5 Preface Long before Kiev’s Independence Square became a sea of orange, it was clear to close observers that the presidential election in 2004 would not only be extremely close and hard fought, but also decisive for the country’s future development. Discussions
    [Show full text]
  • La Instrumentalización Política Del Festival De Eurovisión: El Caso Del Enfrentamiento Entre Rusia Y Ucrania (2010-2019)”
    FACULTAD DE COMUNICACIÓN GRADO EN PERIODISMO TRABAJO DE FIN DE GRADO “La instrumentalización política del Festival de Eurovisión: el caso del enfrentamiento entre Rusia y Ucrania (2010-2019)” JUNIO 2020. SEVILLA. AUTOR: DANIEL LINDO GARCÍA TUTOR: FERNANDO RAMÓN CONTRERAS MEDINA RESUMEN La cuestionada gestión de los servicios públicos de televisión, y la influencia de la Unión Europea de Radiodifusión y sus derivados en los cinco continentes, hacen del Festival de Eurovisión un escenario perfecto para la propagación de las consignas políticas que defienden los dispares gobiernos europeos que administran los primeros. La Revolución del Maidán y la anexión rusa de Crimea no solo provocaron una colisión entre Kiev y Moscú, también lograron acercar a una antigua república soviética como Ucrania a Bruselas. El longevo evento de música, reflejo del poder económico occidental, no ha sido sino la mayor plataforma mediática donde Rusia y su país vecino han librado una de sus muchas batallas. Palabras clave: Rusia, Ucrania, Eurovisión, Europa, canciones, televisión. ÍNDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1. INTERÉS EN EL TEMA DE ESTUDIO E HIPÓTESIS ...................................... 1 1.2. ESTRUCTURA ..................................................................................................... 2 1.3. PLANTEAMIENTO GENERAL .......................................................................... 3 1.3.1. Objetivos ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FOREWORD It Is an Honour for Me to Present This Compendium Which
    FOREWORD FOREWORD It is an honour for me to present this compendium which includes papers, practical information and proposals for combating fraud and corruption based on experience of the Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) in Central, Eastern Europe and Asia. The book was prepared upon the results of the EUROSAI International Conference “The Role of Supreme Audit Institutions in Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption” hosted by the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine on September 1921, 2006 in Kyiv. The EUROSAI event was attended by 61 participants from 24 SAIs among which were present Presidents of 16 SAIs. The participants discussed the following subthemes: • Subtheme I: The Role of SAIs in the National System Development of Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption; • Subtheme II: Peculiarities of SAIs Cooperation with the Law Enforcement Bodies during Exposure and Prevention of Fraud and Corruption; • Subtheme III: The Practice of SAIs in Implementation Transparency and Publicity in the Field of Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption. The Conference was supported by the Parliament of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministries of Ukraine and by the number of Ukrainian government authorities which participated in this event. I would like to pass special thanks to all of my colleagues, Heads of the SAIs for their interest in the Conference and willingness to share experience and modern techniques in fighting against fraud and corruption. I am very pleased that the initiative of the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine received great feedback among the EUROSAI community. I am deeply convinced that this event stimulated and consolidated efficient collaboration between SAIs and that approved Recommendations will further facilitate applying common actions towards combating such negative phenomena as fraud and corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Defying the Government, Marchers in Kyiv Honor The
    INSIDE: • Rule of law in retreat in Yanukovych’s Ukraine – page 2. • Volodymyr Viatrovych on “excising” Ukrainian history – page 8. • Annual swim meet at Soyuzivka Heritage Center – page 13. THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No. 42 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine Bus-train collision in Ukraine kills 43 Legitimacy of elections in doubt as rules changes are questioned by Zenon Zawada Kyiv Press Bureau KYIV – Ukraine’s local elections on October 31 have begun to lose their legitimacy both domestically and within the international commu- nity, which has criticized rules that have tilted con- trol of election commis- sions in favor of the rul- ing Party of Regions of Ukraine. “At the given moment, we have the impression that your legislation doesn’t conform to international Oleksander Prylepa/UNIAN standards,” Gudrun Mosler- A view of the aftermath of the deadly collision between a passenger bus and a Ternstrem, an Austrian Oleksander Prokopenko/UNIAN train outside of Marhanets, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine. election observer represent- Volodymyr Podriezov, a deputy of the Kyiv Oblast RFE/RL life” and urged tougher requirements for the ing the Council of Europe, Council, leads a hunger strike outside the Central told the Komersant-Ukraina “physical and psychological condition” of Election Committee. Batkivschyna party activists are KYIV – Officials say 43 people died and newspaper, published on demanding that election commissions register the real passenger vehicle drivers. several were seriously injured when a pas- October 13. “Already we candidates of Batkivschyna instead of the “clone candi- senger bus collided with a train in eastern Road and railway accidents are common have the impression that dates” that were officially registered.
    [Show full text]
  • A Turbulent Year for Ukraine Urbulent Was the Way to Describe 2009 for Ukraine, Which Plunged Into Financial Crisis
    No. 3 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 17, 2010 5 2009: THE YEAR IN REVIEW A turbulent year for Ukraine urbulent was the way to describe 2009 for Ukraine, which plunged into financial crisis. No other European country suffered as much as TUkraine, whose currency was devalued by more than 60 percent since its peak of 4.95 hrv per $1 in August 2008. In addition, the country’s industrial production fell by 31 percent in 2009. Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko con- fronted the challenge of minimizing the crisis fallout, while at the same time campaigning for the 2010 presi- dential elections. Her critics attacked her for pursuing populist policies, such as increasing wages and hiring more government staff, when the state treasury was broke as early as the spring. Ms. Tymoshenko herself admitted that her gov- ernment would not have been able to make all its pay- ments without the help of three tranches of loans, worth approximately $10.6 billion, provided by the International Monetary Fund. Her critics believe that instead of borrowing money, Ms. Tymoshenko should have been introducing radical reforms to the Ukrainian economy, reducing government waste, eliminating out- dated Soviet-era benefits and trimming the bureaucracy. The year began with what is becoming an annual tra- Offi cial Website of Ukraine’s President dition in Ukraine – a natural gas conflict provoked by the government of Russian Federation Prime Minister President Viktor Yushchenko and Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko at the heated February 10 meeting of Vladimir Putin. Whereas the New Year’s Day crisis of the National Security and Defense Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Ukraine and Viktor Yushchenko Revive Their Fortunes
    OUR UKRAINE AND VIKTOR YUSHCHENKO REVIVE THEIR FORTUNES By Taras Kuzio Thursday, April 19, 2007 Eurasian Daily Monitor On April 18, the opposition Yulia Tymoshenko (BYuT) and Our Ukraine blocs permanently withdrew their deputies from Ukraine’s parliament. Together, the factions account for 202 of the Rada’s 450 deputies. With no constitutional majority, the parliament -- which was disbanded by presidential decree on April 2 -- has no legal standing. A minimum of 300 deputies is required for parliament to constitutionally operate. This move is the culmination of eight months of political fighting between Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych and his government and the disunited and partially discredited opposition. But now the opposition has transformed into an energized political force. Reflecting this growing confidence, President Viktor Yushchenko, Our Ukraine, and Yuriy Lutsenko’s People’s Self-Defense movement no longer oppose early elections. Opposition unity was made possible by a shift in the balance of power within Our Ukraine and an effort to reach out to the Tymoshenko bloc. BYuT had always been in opposition to the Anti-Crisis Coalition (ACC) and had never supported a grand coalition with Yanukovych’s Party of Regions. Following the 2004 Orange Revolution, the “Liubi Druzi” (business cronies or “Dear Friends”) wing of Our Ukraine had dominated, and then-prime minister Yuriy Yekhanurov disastrously led it during the 2006 parliamentary elections. The “Liubi Druzi” supported a grand coalition -- and opposed Yulia Tymoshenko -- while the national-democratic wing backed an Orange coalition. Both coalition variants were negotiated simultaneously from April-June 2006 but neither succeeded, and the ACC was established following the defection of the Socialist Party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Negative Consequences of Proportional Representation in Ukraine
    THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION IN UKRAINE SERHIJ VASYLCHENKO POLITICAL GEOGRAPHER Abstract: Ukraine has changed its electoral law numerous times. The first two elections to the parliament in 1990 and 1994 employed a single-member district majoritarian system. The Verkhovna Rada elections in 1998 and 2002 used a mixed system with single- member districts and proportional representation. The parliamentary elections in 2006 and 2007 were purely proportional representation. Finally, the elections in 2012 went back to the mixed system. This article argues that the use of proportional representation has facilitated extensive manipulation in the Ukrainian political system through the creation of “party projects” and by severing the link between parliamentarians and their constituents. fter Ukraine gained its independence in 1991, it faced an urgent need Ato reform its electoral legislation to address new political realities – most importantly, the development of a multiparty system in place of the previous one-party system that had ruled the Soviet Union. According to the existing law adopted during the Soviet era, parties other than the Communist Party of the Soviet Union had no legal basis. That law laid out a first past the post majoritarian system in which the winner had to win an absolute majority of the votes.1 The opposition national-democrat deputies in the People’s Rada group in the first years of independence supported electoral law reform Serhij Vasylchenko is an independent political geographer in Ukraine, [email protected]. 1 Law “On elections of the people’s deputies of the Ukrainian SSR” from October 27, 1987, Vedomosti Verkhnoi Rady USSR, 1989 addendum to N 45, article 626 <http://zakon4.rada.
    [Show full text]