1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image 1. PaDIL Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Sesamia grisescens Warren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Amphipyrinae) Common Name Ramu shoot borer Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/136261 Image Library Australian Biosecurity Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/ Partners for Australian Biosecurity image library Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment https://www.awe.gov.au/ Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia https://dpird.wa.gov.au/ Plant Health Australia https://www.planthealthaustralia.com.au/ Museums Victoria https://museumsvictoria.com.au/ 2. Species Information 2.1. Details Specimen Contact: NAQS/AQIS Mareeba - Author: Walker, K. Citation: Walker, K. (2005) Ramu shoot borer(Sesamia grisescens)Updated on 10/21/2011 Available online: PaDIL - http://www.padil.gov.au Image Use: Free for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY- NC 4.0) 2.2. URL Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/136261 2.3. Facets Status: Exotic Regulated Pest - absent from Australia Group: Moths Commodity Overview: Field Crops and Pastures Commodity Type: Fresh Stems, Grasses, Sugarcane Distribution: Australasian - Oceanian 2.4. Other Names Pink stalk borer Pink sugarcane borer Shoot borer Sugarcane borer 2.5. Diagnostic Notes INCURSION MANAGEMENT PLANS from BSES Chilo incursion management planDiatraea incursion management planEldana incursion management planEoreuma loftini incursion management planGeneric incursion management planScirpophaga incursion management planSesamia incursion management planSugarcane Smut - A contingency plan for the Australian sugar industry The moths have a wingspan of 3-4 cm. The male moth has serrated antennae, whereas these are simple in the females. The head has labial palpi that are turned upwards. The forewings in S. grisescens are dark greyish-umber, the terminal line is distinct and the sub-terminal line is indistinct. The transverse posterior line is distinct. The fascia is darker, the disc has two spots; one in the middle and another near the base, and the middle spot on either side is followed by light-umber shades, the distal one being longer. The hindwing is light-umber with a dark shade towards the margin. (CABI 2004) 2.6. References Allsopp, PG &amp; Sallam, MS (2001) BSS249 Preparedness for borer incursion. Sesamia incursion management plan Version 1. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations Publication, Project report PR01002 CABI (2004) CABI Crop Protection Compendium, 2004 Edition. © CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 2004." Kuniata L. S. (1998) Borer damage and estimation of losses caused by Sesamia grisescens Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in sugarcane in Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Pest Management, 44: 93-98 Whittle, C.P., Vickers, R.A., Kuniata, L.S., Bellas, T.E., and Rumbo, E.R. 1995. Identification of an attractant for the cane borer Sesamia grisescens Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1409- 1420. Young GR, Kuniata LS, 1992. Life history and biology of Sesamia grisescens Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a sugarcane borer in Papua New Guinea. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 31(3):199-203. Young GR, Kuniata LS, 1995. The population dynamics of the borer, Sesamia grisescens Walker</ 2.7. Web Links Sesamia incursion management plan: http://www.bses.org.au/IncuManaPlan/PR01002.pdf 3. Diagnostic Images Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Abdomen Dorsal View - Female: Amy Abdomen Dorsal View - Male: Amy Carmichael Queensland University of Carmichael Queensland University of Technology Technology Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Abdomen Ventral View - Female: Amy Abdomen Ventral View - Male: Amy Carmichael Queensland University of Carmichael Queensland University of Technology Technology Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Dorsal View - Female: Amy Carmichael Forewing Closeup Dorsal View - Female: Queensland University of Technology Amy Carmichael Queensland University of Technology Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Forewing Closeup Dorsal View - Male: Amy Forewing Closeup Ventral View - Male: Amy Carmichael Queensland University of Carmichael Queensland University of Technology Technology Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Head Dorsal View - Female: Amy Head Dorsal View - Male: Amy Carmichael Carmichael Queensland University of Queensland University of Technology Technology Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Head Ventral View - Female: Amy Head Ventral View - Male: Amy Carmichael Carmichael Queensland University of Queensland University of Technology Technology Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Hindwing Closeup Dorsal View - Female: Hindwing Closeup Dorsal View - Male: Amy Amy Carmichael Queensland University of Carmichael Queensland University of Technology Technology Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Hindwing Closeup Ventral View - Female: Hindwing Closeup Ventral View - Male: Amy Amy Carmichael Queensland University of Carmichael Queensland University of Technology Technology Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Ventral View - Female: Amy Carmichael Wings Ventral View - Female: Amy Queensland University of Technology Carmichael Queensland University of Technology 4. Other Images Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. Bubia, Morobe Province, PNG, Feb. 1981. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. G. R. Young ex Sugarcane. Det. G.R. Young 1981 Young 1981 Dorsal View - Male: Amy Carmichael Ventral View - Male: Amy Carmichael Queensland University of Technology Queensland University of Technology Results Generated: Sunday, September 26, 2021 .
Recommended publications
  • Insert Report Title Here
    Vegetable biosecurity & quarantine gap analysis Prue McMichael Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd Project Number: VG07087 VG07087 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the vegetable industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of the vegetable industry. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 1849 X Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 7 179 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 E-Mail: [email protected] © Copyright 2008 FINAL REPORT Vegetable Biosecurity and Quarantine Gap Analysis VG07087 Prepared for : Horticulture Australia Ltd HAL Project No. VG07087 Prepared by : Prue McMichael Completion Date : September 2008 SCHOLEFIELD ROBINSON HORTICULTURAL SERVICES PTY LTD 118A Glen Osmond Road, Parkside SA 5063 Australia ACN 008 199 737 PO Box 650, Fullarton SA 5063 Ph: (08) 8373 2488 ABN 63 008 199 737 Fax: (08) 8373 2442 Email: [email protected] Web Site: www.srhs.com.au Offices in Adelaide and Mildura Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd HAL Project No. VG 07087 PROJECT LEADER Dr Prue McMichael Senior Consultant/Plant Pathologist Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd PO Box 650 Fullarton SA 5063 PURPOSE OF REPORT This Final Report has been prepared to document information acquired, analysed and considered during the review undertaken for HAL, into all aspects of the biosecurity of Australia’s vegetable industries that are members of AUSVEG.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from BOLD Or Requested from Other Authors
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Towards a global DNA barcode reference library for quarantine identifcations of lepidopteran Received: 28 November 2018 Accepted: 5 April 2019 stemborers, with an emphasis on Published: xx xx xxxx sugarcane pests Timothy R. C. Lee 1, Stacey J. Anderson2, Lucy T. T. Tran-Nguyen3, Nader Sallam4, Bruno P. Le Ru5,6, Desmond Conlong7,8, Kevin Powell 9, Andrew Ward10 & Andrew Mitchell1 Lepidopteran stemborers are among the most damaging agricultural pests worldwide, able to reduce crop yields by up to 40%. Sugarcane is the world’s most prolifc crop, and several stemborer species from the families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Crambidae and Pyralidae attack sugarcane. Australia is currently free of the most damaging stemborers, but biosecurity eforts are hampered by the difculty in morphologically distinguishing stemborer species. Here we assess the utility of DNA barcoding in identifying stemborer pest species. We review the current state of the COI barcode sequence library for sugarcane stemborers, assembling a dataset of 1297 sequences from 64 species. Sequences were from specimens collected and identifed in this study, downloaded from BOLD or requested from other authors. We performed species delimitation analyses to assess species diversity and the efectiveness of barcoding in this group. Seven species exhibited <0.03 K2P interspecifc diversity, indicating that diagnostic barcoding will work well in most of the studied taxa. We identifed 24 instances of identifcation errors in the online database, which has hampered unambiguous stemborer identifcation using barcodes. Instances of very high within-species diversity indicate that nuclear markers (e.g. 18S, 28S) and additional morphological data (genitalia dissection of all lineages) are needed to confrm species boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Risk Assessment
    An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDCInnovation for rural Australia An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries by Dr Robert C Keogh February 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-007347 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-320-8 ISSN 1440-6845 An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries Publication No. 11/141 Project No. PRJ-007347 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • BSES Limited
    BSES Limited REVIEW OF MOTH-BORER RESISTANCE SCREENING AND REPORT ON VISIT TO SASRI by Peter Samson SR09004 Contact: Peter Samson Principal Entomologist BSES Limited PMB 57 Mackay Mail Centre, Q 4741 Telephone: 07 4963 6815 Facsimile: 07 4954 5167 Email: [email protected] BSES is not a partner, joint venturer, employee or agent of SRDC and has no authority to legally bind SRDC, in any publication of substantive details or results of this Project. BSES Limited Publication Study Tour Report SR09004 November 2009 Copyright © 2009 by BSES Limited All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of BSES Limited. Warning: Our tests, inspections and recommendations should not be relied on without further, independent inquiries. They may not be accurate, complete or applicable for your particular needs for many reasons, including (for example) BSES Limited being unaware of other matters relevant to individual crops, the analysis of unrepresentative samples or the influence of environmental, managerial or other factors on production. Disclaimer: Except as required by law and only to the extent so required, none of BSES Limited, its directors, officers or agents makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to, or shall in any way be liable (including liability in negligence) directly or indirectly for any loss, damages, costs, expenses or reliance arising out of or in connection with, the accuracy, currency, completeness or balance of (or otherwise), or any errors in or omissions from, any test results, recommendations statements or other information provided to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Natural Enemy in Stem Borers Complex in Sugar Cane at Tendaho Sugar Factory, Ethiopia
    Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. (2019). 6(1): 25-32 International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN: 2348-8069 www.ijarbs.com DOI: 10.22192/ijarbs Coden: IJARQG(USA) Volume 6, Issue 1 - 2019 Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2019.06.01.003 Identification of Natural Enemy in Stem Borers Complex in Sugar cane at Tendaho Sugar Factory, Ethiopia. Kidane T/Michael1*, Bayeh Mulatu2 and Mulugeta Negeri3 1Ethiopian Sugar Corporation, Research and Development, P. O. Box 15, Wonji, Ethiopia 2Ethiopia Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 3Department of Plant science, Ambo University, Ambo P. O. Box 19, Ethiopia *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract Field study was conducted in Tendaho sugarcane plantation to identify the natural enemy of stalk borers under field condition using four commercial sugarcane varieties during 2013/14 cropping season. From 98 surveyed fields, a total of two different cotesia species were identified. the two species of natural enemy of stalk borers: Cotesia flavies and Cotesia sesamiae were recorded at Tendaho. Among these species, Cotesia flavies were the most dominant species. Among the different factors considered variety and cuttings had a significant effect on parasitism of stalk borer. Parasitism of stalk borer increased in the season. Among the different cuttings, ratoon had a significant variation in stalk borer larvae parasitism. Moreover, among the varieties, NCO334 had showed significant variation in percent parasitism of stalk borer larvae as compared to the other varieties in the plantation. as well as, in terms of percent parasitism of stalk borer larvae in the varieties B52/298, NCO334 and N14 showed no significant variation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biocontrol of Insect Pests of Sugarcane (Saccharum Sp
    BIOCONTROL OF INSECT PESTS OF SUGARCANE ( SACCHARUM SP .) By *Zia-ul-Hussnain, Asia Naheed and Saadia Rizwana *Shakarganj Sugar Research Institute, Jhang, PAKISTAN ABSTRACT Sugarcane ( Saccharum sp.) crop is habitat of more than 1500 species of insects in the sugar world. Amongst these borers like Scirpophaga excerptalis , Chilo infuscatellus , Emmalocera depresella , Acigona steniellus and sucking insect pest Pyrilla perpusilla are major devastators to cause considerable loss in yield and quality of the crop. In our country primary and secondary insect pests species identified were 11, while parasites and predators species were 14 in cane fields. Studies revealed that with 75 % infestation of borers, sucrose recovery was 52 % lower. Field data on infestation of Pyrilla perpusilla showed that decline in cane yield was 18%. Biocontrol of insect pest of sugarcane crop through artificial rearing of Trichogramma chilonis was initiated from 1999 and for Chrysoperla carnea from 2002 at the institute . Results of the field studies revealed that under unreleased area of Trichogramma chilonis, the infestation of borers was 11.65% and in the released area it was 2.74 %. The acreage covered with the released of the parasites was more than 50 thousands from last five years in cane growing areas of Shakarganj Mills. It was observed that under controlled conditions Chrysoperla carnea larvae predated 80% eggs of Pyrilla perpusilla . Efficiency of biocontrol of the insect pest can be improved only with integrated management practices of the crop identified, these are resistant varieties, alternate planting dates, trash blanketing of ratoon crop, early harvesting, balanced fertigation, pest-free seed cane and field monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheromone Production, Male Abundance, Body Size, and the Evolution of Elaborate Antennae in Moths Matthew R
    Pheromone production, male abundance, body size, and the evolution of elaborate antennae in moths Matthew R. E. Symonds1,2, Tamara L. Johnson1 & Mark A. Elgar1 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia 2Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Keywords Abstract Antennal morphology, forewing length, Lepidoptera, phylogenetic generalized least The males of some species of moths possess elaborate feathery antennae. It is widely squares, sex pheromone. assumed that these striking morphological features have evolved through selection for males with greater sensitivity to the female sex pheromone, which is typically Correspondence released in minute quantities. Accordingly, females of species in which males have Matthew R. E. Symonds, School of Life and elaborate (i.e., pectinate, bipectinate, or quadripectinate) antennae should produce Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 the smallest quantities of pheromone. Alternatively, antennal morphology may Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9251 7437; Fax: +61 3 be associated with the chemical properties of the pheromone components, with 9251 7626; E-mail: elaborate antennae being associated with pheromones that diffuse more quickly (i.e., [email protected] have lower molecular weights). Finally, antennal morphology may reflect population structure, with low population abundance selecting for higher sensitivity and hence Funded by a Discovery Project grant from the more elaborate antennae. We conducted a phylogenetic comparative analysis to test Australian Research Council (DP0987360). these explanations using pheromone chemical data and trapping data for 152 moth species. Elaborate antennae are associated with larger body size (longer forewing Received: 13 September 2011; Revised: 23 length), which suggests a biological cost that smaller moth species cannot bear.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Edition Sugarcane Pink Borer (278)
    Pacific Pests, Pathogens and Weeds - Online edition Sugarcane pink borer (278) Common Name Pink sugarcane borer, Ramu shoot borer, sugarcane borer Scientific Name Sesamia grisescens. It is a member of the Noctuidae. Distribution Indonesia (West Papua and Maluku), and Papua New Guinea, from sea level to 1600 m on the mainland and islands. Photo 1. Damage to sugarcane by the pink sugarcane borer, Sesamia grisescens, boring Hosts into the stem. Sugarcane and relatives (including Saccharum edule, lowland pitpit, and Saccharum spontaneum, wild sugarcane), and grasses, Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus) and elephant grass (Centrus purpureus). Symptoms & Life Cycle The sugarcane borer is the most serious insect pest in the commercial sugarcane plantation of Ramu Agri-Industries Limited, Papua New Guinea. Severely infested crops have many dead shoots, and tunnels in the upper parts of the stems filled with chewed cane and faeces (frass), and low sugar content. Bored stems break in strong winds (Photo 1). Eggs are laid in clusters of 20-250 under the green leaf sheaths of young cane, 2-6-months old. They hatch in about 8 days, and then the larvae mine the inner surface of the leaves for 2-3 days before boring into the top of the stalk together to feed at the base of the meristem, killing the youngest, still folded, leaves, and causing a symptom known as 'dead heart'. After about 2 Photo 2. Adult pink sugarcane borer, Sesamia weeks, and if crowded, some larvae migrate to other stems on the same plant or to plants grisescens. nearby and bore into the upper internodes of the stems.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Populations in West
    THE PHYLOGENETIC AND PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIPS OF PEDIOBIUS FURVUS (HYMENOPTERA: EULOPHIDAE) POPULATIONS IN WEST AFRICA. IBRAHIM MANGHA OKEKE SHAMIE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, 2004 UMI Number: U584700 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U584700 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 THE PHYLOGENETIC AND PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIPS OF P E D IO B IU S F U R V U S (HYMENOPTERA: EULOPHIDAE) POPULATIONS IN WEST AFRICA. BY IBRAHIM MANGHA OKEKE SHAMIE DIPLOMA IN INSECT TAXONOMY (DISTINCTION) MASTER OF PHILISOPHY CARDIFF UNIVERSITY THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY CARDIFF UNIVERSITY MAY, 2004 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Date STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations except where stated and due acknowledgement has been made if any assistance received. A bibliography is appended. Signedt .V^(Candidate) D.U ......................... STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Monitoring of Stem Borers (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) at Tendaho Sugar Factory, Ethiopia
    Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. (2018). 5(11): 27-38 International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN: 2348-8069 www.ijarbs.com DOI: 10.22192/ijarbs Coden: IJARQG(USA) Volume 5, Issue 11 - 2018 Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2018.05.11.004 Identification and Monitoring of Stem Borers (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) at Tendaho Sugar Factory, Ethiopia. Kidane T/Michael1*, Bayeh Mulatu2 and Mulugeta Negeri3 1Ethiopian Sugar Corporation, Research and Development, P.O.Box 15, Wonji, Ethiopia 2Ethiopia Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 3Department of Plant science, Ambo University, Ambo P.O.Box 19, Ethiopia Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract Field study was conducted at Tendaho sugarcane plantation to determine the composition of stem borer species and extent of damage, monitoring under field condition using four commercial sugarcane varieties during 2013/14 cropping season. From 96 surveyed fields, a total of three different lepidopteran stem borer species were identified. a complex of three stem borers: S. calamistis, C. partellus and E. saccharina were recorded at Tendaho. Among these species, S. calamistis and C. partellus were the most dominant species. Among the different factors considered variety and cuttings had a significant effect on incidence and severity of stem borer. Both incidence and severity of stem borer increased in the season. Among the different cuttings, ratoon had a significant variation in stem borer incidence and severity in the season. Moreover, among the varieties, CO680 had showed significant variation in incidence and severity of stem borer as compared to the other varieties in the plantation.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Infestation of Infestation of Various Borers in Sugarcane from District Dadu Sindh Cane from District Dadu
    UNIVERSITY OF SINDH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp: (27-32), November, 2017 Email: [email protected] ISSN(E): 2523 -6067 Website: http://sujo.usindh.edu.pk/index.php/USJAS ISSN(P): 2521 -8328 © Published by University of Sindh, Jamshoro Study on the Infestation of various Borers in Sugarcane from District Dadu Sindh Abdul Aziz, Riffat Sultana , Santosh Kumar, Imran Khatri 1 Department of Zoology, University of Sindh, Jamshoro 1Department of Entomology, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, Pakistan ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT Article History: During the present investigation weekly survey has been carried out in Received 24th August, 2017 district Daud and the study area was divided into 05 different sectors Accepted: 2nd November 2017 where 04 varieties of sugarcane i-e: SPF-234, CPF -237, Thatta-10 and Published online 16 th November, 2017 BL4 are grown in 08 sectors. D uring the field survey maximum infestation of 05 borers viz: stem borer ( Chilo tumidicostalis ), shoot Author’s contribution AA observed the samples in field borer ( Chilo infuscatellus), Internode Borer ( Chilo sacchariphagus noticed the infestation, RS designed the indicus), top borer (Sciropophaga excerptalis) and root borer experiment and supervised this work & (Emmalocera depressella) was reported on cane . It was noticed that SK & IK compiled the data. borers usually damage the cane and effect quantity, quality and reduce the sucrose of cane. The infestation belongs to the Chilo species is cause Key words: Pest, sugarcane, varieties, Chilo, damage approximately 10 – 80% of cane and somewhere cau sing “dead infestation, quality, damage heart “which low down the market value of crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2016 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry 2016 Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2016 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2016) Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry (Version 3.0 – May 2016). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific and independent professional advice.
    [Show full text]