DOCSLIB.ORG

Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2016 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry 2016 Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2016 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2016) Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry (Version 3.0 – May 2016). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific and independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry 2016 Acknowledgements The Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry was coordinated by Plant Health Australia and developed through a partnership approach using government and industry resources and expertise. The following organisations and agencies were involved in the development and finalisation of the plan: Endorsement The Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry (Version 3.0) was formally endorsed by the sugarcane industry (through CANEGROWERS) in March 2016, and all state and territory governments (through the Plant Health Committee) in May 2016. The Australian Government endorses the document without prejudice for the purposes of industries planning needs and meeting the Department’s obligations under Clause 13 of the EPPRD. In providing this endorsement the Department notes page 41 of the Plan which states: “This Document considers all potential pathways by which a pest might enter Australia, including natural and assisted spread (including smuggling). This is a broader view of potential risk than the IRA conducted by the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources which focus only on specific regulated import pathways”. PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry 2016 Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 9 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 10 Implementing Biosecurity for the Australian Sugarcane Industry 2016-2020 ....................... 11 Biosecurity implementation table ....................................................................................... 11 Australian sugarcane industry - biosecurity preparedness ................................................ 21 Sugarcane Industry Biosecurity Statement ........................................................................ 24 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 29 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 30 What is biosecurity and why is it important? ...................................................................... 30 The Plant Biosecurity System in Australia ............................................................................. 30 Plant Health Australia ......................................................................................................... 31 The Industry Biosecurity Plan ................................................................................................ 32 Biosecurity planning ........................................................................................................... 33 Industry Biosecurity Plan development .............................................................................. 33 Review processes .............................................................................................................. 34 Document Overview .............................................................................................................. 35 Threat identification and pest risk assessments ................................................................ 35 Risk mitigation and preparedness ...................................................................................... 35 Response management ..................................................................................................... 36 THREAT IDENTIFICATION AND PEST RISK ASSESSMENTS ............................................ 37 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 38 Exotic Pests of the Sugarcane Industry ................................................................................ 38 Threat identification ............................................................................................................ 38 Pest risk assessments ........................................................................................................ 39 Ranking pest threats .......................................................................................................... 40 Description of terms used in pest risk tables ...................................................................... 41 Sugarcane industry high priority exotic pests..................................................................... 44 Established Pests of Biosecurity Significance ....................................................................... 48 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 48 Threat identification ............................................................................................................ 48 Prioritising pest threats ....................................................................................................... 48 Established Weeds of Biosecurity Significance ..................................................................... 54 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 54 Threat identification ............................................................................................................ 54 Prioritising pest threats ....................................................................................................... 55 RISK MITIGATION AND PREPAREDNESS ........................................................................... 60 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 61 Barrier Quarantine ................................................................................................................. 62 National level – importation restrictions ............................................................................. 62 State and regional level – movement restrictions .............................................................. 64 Farm level – exclusion activities ......................................................................................... 68 Other components of the supply chain ............................................................................... 68 Surveillance ........................................................................................................................... 71 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Sugarcane Industry 2016 Training .................................................................................................................................. 76 Awareness ............................................................................................................................. 76 High priority plant pest threat-related documents .............................................................. 77 Further information/relevant web sites ............................................................................... 78 Farm biosecurity ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taxonomic Status of the Genera Sorosporella and Syngliocladium Associated with Grasshoppers and Locusts (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) in Africa
    Mycol. Res. 106 (6): 737–744 (June 2002). # The British Mycological Society 737 DOI: 10.1017\S0953756202006056 Printed in the United Kingdom. Taxonomic status of the genera Sorosporella and Syngliocladium associated with grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) in Africa Harry C. EVANS* and Paresh A. SHAH† CABI Bioscience UK Centre, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks. SL5 7TA, UK. E-mail: h.evans!cabi.org Received 2 September 2001; accepted 28 April 2002. The occurrence of disease outbreaks associated with the genus Sorosporella on grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) in Africa is reported. Infected hosts, representing ten genera within five acridoid subfamilies, are characterized by red, thick-walled chlamydospores which completely fill the cadaver. On selective media, the chlamydospores, up to seven-years-old, germinated to produce a Syngliocladium anamorph which is considered to be undescribed. The new species Syngliocladium acridiorum is described and two varieties are delimited: var. acridiorum, on various grasshopper and locust genera from the Sahelian region of West Africa; and, var. madagascariensis, on the Madagascan migratory locust. The ecology of these insect-fungal associations is discussed. Sorosporella is treated as a synonym of Syngliocladium. INTRODUCTION synanamorph, Syngliocladium Petch. Subsequently, Hodge, Humber & Wozniak (1998) described two Between 1990 and 1993, surveys for mycopathogens of Syngliocladium species from the USA and emended the orthopteran pests were conducted in Africa and Asia as generic diagnosis, which also included Sorosporella as a part of a multinational, collaborative project for the chlamydosporic synanamorph. biological control of grasshoppers and locusts of the Based on these recent developments, the taxonomic family Acridoidea or Acrididae (Kooyman & Shah status of the collections on African locusts and 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarcane Wilt: New Insights Into Pathogen Identity, Variability and Pathogenicity
    ® Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology ©2012 Global Science Books Sugarcane Wilt: New Insights into Pathogen Identity, Variability and Pathogenicity Rasappa Viswanathan* • Muthusamy Poongothai • Palaniyandi Malathi • Amalraj R. Sundar Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Coimbatore 641007, India Corresponding author : * [email protected] ABSTRACT Wilt of sugarcane, a fungal disease is known to cause significant damage to sugarcane production and productivity in India and other countries for the past one century. Although sugarcane wilt is known in India for a long time, research work on this important disease is totally lacking. The causal organism was found to vary with time and investigator and could not reproduce the disease under artificial conditions in the field. We have made detailed disease surveys in 13 major sugarcane growing states in the country and 263 Fusarium isolates were isolated. We have established the variation in Fusarium isolates associated with sugarcane wilt, based on cultural, morphological, pathogenic and molecular characterization of 117 isolates. Critical observations in the conventional techniques combined with molecular biological approaches clearly established that Fusarium sacchari as the causal agent of the disease. Other Fusarium sp isolated from wilt infected sugarcane stalks were found to be either secondary invaders or non-pathogenic in nature. We have developed an artificial simulation technique to induce wilt in sugarcane under field conditions and
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarab Beetles in Human Culture
    Coleopterists Society Monograph Number 5:85–101. 2006. SCARAB BEETLES IN HUMAN CULTURE BRETT C. RATCLIFFE Systematics Research Collections University of Nebraska Lincoln, NE 68588-0514, U.S.A. [email protected] Abstract The use of scarab beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) by primarily pre- and non-industrial peoples throughout the world is reviewed. These uses consist of (1) religion and folklore, (2) folk medicine, (3) food, and (4) regalia and body ornamentation. The use of scarabs in religion or cosmology, once widespread in ancient Egypt, exists only rarely today in other cultures. Scarabs have a minor role in folk medicine today although they may have been more important in the past. The predominant utilization of these beetles today, and probably in the past as well, is as food with emphasis on the larval stage. Lastly, particularly large or brightly colored scarabs (or their parts) are used (mostly in the New World) to adorn the body or as regalia. If one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams and endeavors to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in the common hours.—Thoreau This paper is warmly dedicated to Henry Howden in celebration of his many long years of dedicated field work in the Neotropics and the many fine paperson scarab systematics that flowed from his exploration and research. Henry’s illustrious career has added immeasurably to our knowledge of all things scarabaeoid. His students and colleagues have all benefited from his mentoring, advice, and wealth of knowledge. For many decades, he has been considered Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/morphologytaxono12haye ' / ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Volume XII PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS *, URBANA, ILLINOIS I EDITORIAL COMMITTEE John Theodore Buchholz Fred Wilbur Tanner Charles Zeleny, Chairman S70.S~ XLL '• / IL cop TABLE OF CONTENTS Nos. Pages 1. Morphological Studies of the Genus Cercospora. By Wilhelm Gerhard Solheim 1 2. Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea. By William Patrick Hayes 85 3. Sawflies of the Sub-family Dolerinae of America North of Mexico. By Herbert H. Ross 205 4. A Study of Fresh-water Plankton Communities. By Samuel Eddy 321 LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Vol. XII April, 1929 No. 2 Editorial Committee Stephen Alfred Forbes Fred Wilbur Tanner Henry Baldwin Ward Published by the University of Illinois under the auspices of the graduate school Distributed June 18. 1930 MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY, AND BIOLOGY OF LARVAL SCARABAEOIDEA WITH FIFTEEN PLATES BY WILLIAM PATRICK HAYES Associate Professor of Entomology in the University of Illinois Contribution No. 137 from the Entomological Laboratories of the University of Illinois . T U .V- TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Introduction Q Economic importance Historical review 11 Taxonomic literature 12 Biological and ecological literature Materials and methods 1%i Acknowledgments Morphology ]* 1 ' The head and its appendages Antennae. 18 Clypeus and labrum ™ 22 EpipharynxEpipharyru Mandibles. Maxillae 37 Hypopharynx <w Labium 40 Thorax and abdomen 40 Segmentation « 41 Setation Radula 41 42 Legs £ Spiracles 43 Anal orifice 44 Organs of stridulation 47 Postembryonic development and biology of the Scarabaeidae Eggs f*' Oviposition preferences 48 Description and length of egg stage 48 Egg burster and hatching Larval development Molting 50 Postembryonic changes ^4 54 Food habits 58 Relative abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    EVALUATION OF Rhyzobius lophanthae (BLAISDELL) AND Cryptolaemus montrouzieri MULSANT (COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE) AS PREDATORS OF Aulacaspis yasumatsui TAKAGI (HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE) By GRETA THORSON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 © 2009 Greta Thorson 2 To my family for their constant support and encouragement, as well as past and present colleagues and mentors who helped inspire me along the way 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my family for their enthusiasm in helping me collect insects and willingness to store countless specimens in their freezers over the years. I’d especially like to thank my major professor and committee members for lending their experience and encouragement. I’d like to also thank my past mentors who inspired me to pursue entomology as a profession. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................................10 ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Recommendations on Cycad Aulacaspis Scale, Aulacaspis Yasumatsui Takagi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae)
    IUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group – Subgroup on Invasive Pests Report and Recommendations on Cycad Aulacaspis Scale, Aulacaspis yasumatsui Takagi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) 18 September 2005 Subgroup Members (Affiliated Institution & Location) • William Tang, Subgroup Leader (USDA-APHIS-PPQ, Miami, FL, USA) • Dr. John Donaldson, CSG Chair (South African National Biodiversity Institute & Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town, South Africa) • Jody Haynes (Montgomery Botanical Center, Miami, FL, USA)1 • Dr. Irene Terry (Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) Consultants • Dr. Anne Brooke (Guam National Wildlife Refuge, Dededo, Guam) • Michael Davenport (Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, Miami, FL, USA) • Dr. Thomas Marler (College of Natural & Applied Sciences - AES, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam) • Christine Wiese (Montgomery Botanical Center, Miami, FL, USA) Introduction The IUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group – Subgroup on Invasive Pests was formed in June 2005 to address the emerging threat to wild cycad populations from the artificial spread of insect pests and pathogens of cycads. Recently, an aggressive pest on cycads, the cycad aulacaspis scale (CAS)— Aulacaspis yasumatsui Takagi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae)—has spread through human activity and commerce to the point where two species of cycads face imminent extinction in the wild. Given its mission of cycad conservation, we believe the CSG should clearly focus its attention on mitigating the impact of CAS on wild cycad populations and cultivated cycad collections of conservation importance (e.g., Montgomery Botanical Center). The control of CAS in home gardens, commercial nurseries, and city landscapes is outside the scope of this report and is a topic covered in various online resources (see www.montgomerybotanical.org/Pages/CASlinks.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross Cultural Comparison of Common Themes and Derived Functions of Insects Exploited for Entomophagy
    A Cross Cultural Comparison of Common Themes and Derived Functions of Insects Exploited for Entomophagy Dustin Reuther Redacted Dustin Reuther Entomophagy Abstract Insects represent a vast resource for human beings around the world. Comparative to their use, little research has been done on the subject. This article looked to determine comparative functions of insects in human societies based upon their physiological and behavioral characteristics. Using primarily secondary sources and to a smaller extent personal experience and interviews the researcher develops common principles that relate universally to the practice of entomophagy. Then the research lists major insects orders used for exploitation and develops common features and key differences found in entomophagous practices of each order. 2 Dustin Reuther Entomophagy Table of Contents Introduction 4 Principles 5 Data and Analysis 11 Coleoptera 12 Hymenoptera 17 Isoptera 30 Lepidoptera 35 Orthoptera 41 Others 45 Conclusion 49 Notes 50 Acknowledged 51 Works Cited 52 Appendix 57 3 Dustin Reuther Entomophagy Introduction Insecta is the most populous animal class on Earth with estimates of over 90% of life on Earth falling under it. Though in the Western world we ignore or actively annihilate this class of animals, in many other parts of the world they hold vast importance as primary food sources, snacks and medicine. The ways in which people around the world interact with and acquire these insects gives us an extensive look at indigenous knowledge pathways. To successfully harvest insects one must be extremely familiar with their surrounding environment and the life cycle of the insects. For example, if one is unprepared for a particular swarming season then a bounty of food may be lost for that year.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteronychus Arator
    Heteronychus arator Scientific Name Heteronychus arator (Fabricius) Synonyms: Heteronychus arator australis Endrödi, Heteronychus indenticulatus Endrodi, Heteronychus madagassus Endrodi, Heteronychus sanctaehelenae Blanchard, Heteronychus transvaalensis Peringuey, Scarabaeus arator Fabricius Common Name(s) Black maize beetle, African black beetle, black lawn beetle, black beetle Type of Pest Beetle Figure 1. Illustration of each stage of the life Taxonomic Position cycle of the black maize beetle, showing a close up view of each stage and a Insecta, Coleoptera, Class: Order: background view showing that the eggs, Family: Scarabaeidae larvae, and pupae are all underground stages with the adults being the only stage Reason for Inclusion appearing above ground. Illustration CAPS Target: AHP Prioritized Pest List- courtesy of NSW Agriculture. http://www.ricecrc.org/Hort/ascu/zecl/zeck11 2006 – 2009 3.htm Pest Description Life stages are shown in Figures 1 and 2. 1 Eggs: White, oval, and measuring approximately 1.8 mm (approx. /16 in) long at time of oviposition. Eggs grow larger through development and become more 3 round in shape. Eggs are laid singly at a soil depth of 1 to 5 cm (approx. /8 to 2 in). Females each lay between 12 to 20 eggs total. In the field, eggs hatch after approximately 20 days. Larvae can be seen clearly with the naked eye (CABI, 2007; Matthiessen and Learmoth, 2005). Larvae: There are three larval instars. Larvae are creamy-white except for the brown head capsule and hind segments, which appear dark where the contents of the gut show through the body wall. The head capsule is smooth textured, 1 1 measuring 1.5 mm (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Peru: a Survey of the Families
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2015 Beetles (Coleoptera) of Peru: A Survey of the Families. Scarabaeoidea Brett .C Ratcliffe University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] M. L. Jameson Wichita State University, [email protected] L. Figueroa Museo de Historia Natural de la UNMSM, [email protected] R. D. Cave University of Florida, [email protected] M. J. Paulsen University of Nebraska State Museum, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Ratcliffe, Brett .;C Jameson, M. L.; Figueroa, L.; Cave, R. D.; Paulsen, M. J.; Cano, Enio B.; Beza-Beza, C.; Jimenez-Ferbans, L.; and Reyes-Castillo, P., "Beetles (Coleoptera) of Peru: A Survey of the Families. Scarabaeoidea" (2015). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 483. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/483 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Brett .C Ratcliffe, M. L. Jameson, L. Figueroa, R. D. Cave, M. J. Paulsen, Enio B. Cano, C. Beza-Beza, L. Jimenez-Ferbans, and P. Reyes-Castillo This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/ 483 JOURNAL OF THE KANSAS ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 88(2), 2015, pp. 186–207 Beetles (Coleoptera) of Peru: A Survey of the Families.
    [Show full text]
  • Parlatoria Ziziphi (Lucas)
    UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT OF AGRI-FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL PhD PROGRAMME IN PLANT HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES CYCLE XXIV 2009-2012 Jendoubi Hanene Current status of the scale insect fauna of citrus in Tunisia and biological studies on Parlatoria ziziphi (Lucas) COORDINATOR SUPERVISOR Prof. Carmelo Rapisarda Prof. Agatino Russo CO-SUPERVISOR Dr. Pompeo Suma EXTERNAL SUPERVISORS Prof. Mohamed Habib Dhouibi Prof. Ferran Garcia Marì - 1 - In the name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful ِ ِ اقَْرأْ بِا ْسم َربِّ َك الَّذي خَلَق Read! In the name of your Lord Who has created (all that exists). ِ خَلَ َق اْْلِنسَا َن م ْن عَلَ ق He has created man from a clot. اقَْرأْ َوَربُّ َك اْْلَ ْكَرمُ Read! And your Lord is Most Generous, ِ ِ الَّذي عَلَّمَ بِالْق َلَم Who has taught (the writing) by the pen عَلَّمَ اْْلِنسَا َن مَا لَْم يَْعلَم He has taught man what he knew not. صدق اهلل العظيم God the almighty spoke the truth - 2 - Declaration "I hereby declare that this submission is my own work except for quotation and citations which have been duly acknowledged; and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other institute of higher learning". Hanene Jendoubi 08.12.2011 - 3 - Title Thesis Current status of the scale insect fauna of citrus in Tunisia and biological studies on Parlatoria ziziphi (Lucas) - 4 - Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my wonderful parents who have continuously told me how proud they are of me.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from BOLD Or Requested from Other Authors
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Towards a global DNA barcode reference library for quarantine identifcations of lepidopteran Received: 28 November 2018 Accepted: 5 April 2019 stemborers, with an emphasis on Published: xx xx xxxx sugarcane pests Timothy R. C. Lee 1, Stacey J. Anderson2, Lucy T. T. Tran-Nguyen3, Nader Sallam4, Bruno P. Le Ru5,6, Desmond Conlong7,8, Kevin Powell 9, Andrew Ward10 & Andrew Mitchell1 Lepidopteran stemborers are among the most damaging agricultural pests worldwide, able to reduce crop yields by up to 40%. Sugarcane is the world’s most prolifc crop, and several stemborer species from the families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Crambidae and Pyralidae attack sugarcane. Australia is currently free of the most damaging stemborers, but biosecurity eforts are hampered by the difculty in morphologically distinguishing stemborer species. Here we assess the utility of DNA barcoding in identifying stemborer pest species. We review the current state of the COI barcode sequence library for sugarcane stemborers, assembling a dataset of 1297 sequences from 64 species. Sequences were from specimens collected and identifed in this study, downloaded from BOLD or requested from other authors. We performed species delimitation analyses to assess species diversity and the efectiveness of barcoding in this group. Seven species exhibited <0.03 K2P interspecifc diversity, indicating that diagnostic barcoding will work well in most of the studied taxa. We identifed 24 instances of identifcation errors in the online database, which has hampered unambiguous stemborer identifcation using barcodes. Instances of very high within-species diversity indicate that nuclear markers (e.g. 18S, 28S) and additional morphological data (genitalia dissection of all lineages) are needed to confrm species boundaries.
    [Show full text]