First Finding of Archaeopteridaceae Wood in the Upper Devonian Deposits of the Middle Timan Region O
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
S1. List of Taxa Included in the Disparity Analysis and the Phylogenetic Alysis, with Main References
S1. List of taxa included in the disparity analysis and the phylogenetic alysis, with main references. Taxa in bold are included in the phylogenetic analysis; taxa also indicated by * are included only in the phylogenetic analysis and not in the disparity analysis. Three unpublished arborescent taxa were included on the basis that they showed additional anatomical diversity. 1 Callixylon trunk from the Late Devonian of Marrocco showing large sclerotic nests in pith; 2 Axis from the late Tournaisian of Algeria, previously figured in Galtier (1988), and Galtier & Meyer-Berthaud (2006); 3 Trunk from the late Viséan of Australia. All these specimens and corresponding slides are currently kept in the Paleobotanical collections, Service des Collections, Université Montpellier II, France, under the specimen numbers 600/2/3, JC874 and YB1-2. Main reference Psilophyton* Banks et al., 1975 Aneurophytales Rellimia thomsonii Dannenhoffer & Bonamo, 2003; --- Dannenhoffer et al., 2007. Tetraxylopteris schmidtii Beck, 1957. Proteokalon petryi Scheckler & Banks, 1971. Triloboxylon arnoldii Stein & Beck, 1983. s m Archaeopteridales Callixylon brownii Hoskin & Cross, 1951. r e Callixylon erianum Arnold, 1930. p s o Callixylon huronensis Chitaley & Cai, 2001. n Callixylon newberry Arnold, 1931. m y g Callixylon trifilievii Lemoigne et al., 1983. o r Callixylon zalesskyi Arnold, 1930. P Callixylon sp. Meyer-Berthaud, unpublished data1. Eddya sullivanensis Beck, 1967. Protopityales Protopitys buchiana Scott, 1923; Galtier et al., 1998. P. scotica Walton, 1957. Protopitys sp. Decombeix et al., 2005. Elkinsiales Elkinsia polymorpha Serbet & Rothwell, 1992. Buteoxylales Buteoxylon gordonianum Barnard &Long, 1973; Matten et al., --- 1980. Triradioxylon primaevum Barnard & Long, 1975. Lyginopteridales Laceya hibernica May & Matten, 1983. Tristichia longii Galtier, 1977. -
4.3 National Holidays As a Multiplier of Ethno-Tourism in the Komi Republic
Community development 161 4.3 National holidays as a multiplier of ethno-tourism in the Komi Republic Galina Gabucheva This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/5.3210 Introduction The Komi Republic has a vast territory, and a rich historical and cultural heritage. There is untouched wildness in most regions, which is a prerequisite for the development of various forms of tourism. A relatively new, but actively developing, sphere of tourism industry in the republic is ethnic tourism linked to the lifestyle and traditions of the Komi people. People increasingly want not just to travel in comfort, but also through a special experience where they learn and try something new. How did our ancestors live without electricity? How did they stoke the stove and light up the house? What tools and objects did they use in everyday life? How did they cultivate crops, hunt, and fish? How did they conduct holidays and feasts, what did they drink and eat, how did they sing and dance? Due to the geographic isolation of the Komi Republic, this Northern European ethnic culture is preserved in the form of traditions and customs, ideas about the world and beliefs, used instruments of labour, clothing and housing, monuments of antiquity, and legends and epic tales. This certainly provides a good basis for the development of ethno-cultural tourism in our region. Ethno-tourism in Komi Today, a number of ethno-tourism projects have been developed by some travel agencies within the republic. -
Ancient Noeggerathialean Reveals the Seed Plant Sister Group Diversified Alongside the Primary Seed Plant Radiation
Ancient noeggerathialean reveals the seed plant sister group diversified alongside the primary seed plant radiation Jun Wanga,b,c,1, Jason Hiltond,e, Hermann W. Pfefferkornf, Shijun Wangg, Yi Zhangh, Jiri Beki, Josef Pšenickaˇ j, Leyla J. Seyfullahk, and David Dilcherl,m,1 aState Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; bCenter for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; cUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China; dSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; eBirmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; fDepartment of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6316; gState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China; hCollege of Paleontology, Shenyang Normal University, Key Laboratory for Evolution of Past Life in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shenyang 110034, China; iDepartment of Palaeobiology and Palaeoecology, Institute of Geology v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 165 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic; jCentre of Palaeobiodiversity, West Bohemian Museum in Plzen, 301 36 Plzen, Czech Republic; kDepartment of Paleontology, Geozentrum, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; lIndiana Geological and Water Survey, Bloomington, IN 47404; and mDepartment of Geology and Atmospheric Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 Contributed by David Dilcher, September 10, 2020 (sent for review July 2, 2020; reviewed by Melanie Devore and Gregory J. -
Subject of the Russian Federation)
How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country. -
Archaeopteris Is the Earliest Known Modern Tree
letters to nature seawater nitrate mapping systems for use in open ocean and coastal waters. Deep-Sea Res. I 43, 1763± zones as important sites for the subsequent development of lateral 1775 (1996). 26. Obata, H., Karatani, H., Matsui, M. & Nakayama, E. Fundamental studies for chemical speciation in organs; and wood anatomy strategies that minimize the mechani- seawater with an improved analytical method. Mar. Chem. 56, 97±106 (1997). cal stresses caused by perennial branch growth. Acknowledgements. We thank G. Elrod, E. Guenther, C. Hunter, J. Nowicki and S. Tanner for the iron Archaeopteris is thought to have been an excurrent tree, with a analyses and assistance with sampling, and the crews of the research vessels Western Flyer and New Horizon single trunk producing helically arranged deciduous branches for providing valuable assistance at sea. Funding was provided by the David and Lucile Packard 7 Foundation through MBARI and by the National Science Foundation. growing almost horizontally . All studies relating to the develop- ment of Archaeopteris support the view that these ephemeral Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.S.J. (e-mail: johnson@mlml. calstate.edu). branches arise from the pseudomonopodial division of the trunk apex8±11. Apical branching also characterizes all other contempora- neous non-seed-plant taxa including those that had also evolved an arborescent habit, such as lepidosigillarioid lycopsids and cladoxy- Archaeopteris is the earliest lalean ferns. This pattern, which can disadvantage the tree if the trunk apex is damaged, contrasts with the axillary branching knownmoderntree reported in early seed plants12. Analysis of a 4 m-long trunk from the Famennian of Oklahoma has shown that Archaeopteris may Brigitte Meyer-Berthaud*, Stephen E. -
Classification, Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Time, And
The JapaneseSocietyJapanese Society for Plant Systematics ISSN 1346-7565 Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 56 (2): 111-126 (2005) Invited article and Classification,MolecularPhylogeny,DivergenceTime, Morphological Evolution of Pteridophytes with Notes on Heterospory and and Monophyletic ParaphyleticGroups MASAHIRO KATO* Department ofBiotogicat Sciences,Graduate Schoot ofScience,Universitv. of7bkyo, Hongo, 7bk)]o IJ3- O033, lapan Pteridophytes are free-sporing vascular land plants that evolutionarily link bryophytes and seed plants. Conventiona], group (taxon)-based hierarchic classifications ofptcridophytes using phenetic characters are briefiy reviewcd. Review is also made for recent trcc-based cladistic analyses and molecular phy- logenetic analyses with increasingly large data sets ofmultiplc genes (compared to single genes in pre- vious studies) and increasingly large numbers of spccies representing major groups of pteridophytes (compared to particular groups in previous studies), and it is cxtended to most recent analyses of esti- mating divergcnce times ofpteridephytes, These c]assifications, phylogenetics, and divergcncc time esti- mates have improved our understanding of the diversity and historical structure of pteridophytes. Heterospory is noted with referencc to its origins, endospory, fertilization, and dispersal. Finally, menophylctic and paraphyletic groups rccently proposed or re-recognized are briefly dcscribcd. Key words: classification, divergence timc estimate. fems,heterospory, molecular phylogcny, pteri- dophytcs. Morphological -
Increasing Risk of Great Floods in a Changing Climate
letters to nature 10 1 uncertainty in climate-prediction ensembles . In addition, such a extreme-event risk analysis would bene®t from an increase in the 0.8 resolution of present-day climate models (with grid sizes of hun- dreds of kilometres). For example, it would clearly be of more direct 0.6 relevance for the decision problem discussed above if E was de®ned 0.4 by some speci®c river bursting its banks during a particular season. However, estimating the future risk of this type of event would 0.2 require feeding climate model output into a basin-speci®c hydro- 0 logical model. In general, climate model grid sizes of the order of ten 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 kilometres would be necessary to simulate precipitation statistics 1 adequately over a typical catchment area (though for rivers with Value b large catchment basins, such as the Brahmaputra, coarser climate 0.8 model grids may be adequate). An ability to estimate reliably the 0.6 probability of extreme climate events is an important factor in de®ning future computational requirements for the climate change 0.4 problem. M 0.2 Received 27 September; accepted 18 December 2001. 0 1. Houghton, J. T. et al. (eds) Climate Change 2001: The Scienti®c Basis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 Cambridge, 2001). C/L (%) 2. Palmer, T. N. Predicting uncertainty in forecasts of weather and climate. Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 71±116 (2000). -
Diversity and Evolution of the Megaphyll in Euphyllophytes
G Model PALEVO-665; No. of Pages 16 ARTICLE IN PRESS C. R. Palevol xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Comptes Rendus Palevol w ww.sciencedirect.com General palaeontology, systematics and evolution (Palaeobotany) Diversity and evolution of the megaphyll in Euphyllophytes: Phylogenetic hypotheses and the problem of foliar organ definition Diversité et évolution de la mégaphylle chez les Euphyllophytes : hypothèses phylogénétiques et le problème de la définition de l’organe foliaire ∗ Adèle Corvez , Véronique Barriel , Jean-Yves Dubuisson UMR 7207 CNRS-MNHN-UPMC, centre de recherches en paléobiodiversité et paléoenvironnements, 57, rue Cuvier, CP 48, 75005 Paris, France a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Recent paleobotanical studies suggest that megaphylls evolved several times in land plant st Received 1 February 2012 evolution, implying that behind the single word “megaphyll” are hidden very differ- Accepted after revision 23 May 2012 ent notions and concepts. We therefore review current knowledge about diverse foliar Available online xxx organs and related characters observed in fossil and living plants, using one phylogenetic hypothesis to infer their origins and evolution. Four foliar organs and one lateral axis are Presented by Philippe Taquet described in detail and differ by the different combination of four main characters: lateral organ symmetry, abdaxity, planation and webbing. Phylogenetic analyses show that the Keywords: “true” megaphyll appeared at least twice in Euphyllophytes, and that the history of the Euphyllophytes Megaphyll four main characters is different in each case. The current definition of the megaphyll is questioned; we propose a clear and accurate terminology in order to remove ambiguities Bilateral symmetry Abdaxity of the current vocabulary. -
Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida -
Unique Growth Strategy in the Earth's First Trees Revealed in Silicified Fossil
Unique growth strategy in the Earth’s first trees revealed in silicified fossil trunks from China Hong-He Xua,1, Christopher M. Berryb,1, William E. Steinc,d, Yi Wanga, Peng Tanga, and Qiang Fua aState Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; bSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom; cDepartment of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000; and dPaleontology, New York State Museum, Albany, NY 12230 Edited by Peter R. Crane, Oak Spring Garden Foundation, Upperville, Virginia, and approved September 26, 2017 (received for review May 21, 2017) Cladoxylopsida included the earliest large trees that formed critical Mid-Devonian (ca. 385 Ma) in situ Gilboa fossil forest (New York) components of globally transformative pioneering forest ecosystems (13), reached basal diameters of 1 m supporting long tapering in the Mid- and early Late Devonian (ca. 393–372 Ma). Well-known trunks (14). The sandstone casts (Fig. 1) reveal coalified vascular cladoxylopsid fossils include the up to ∼1-m-diameter sandstone strands but only a little preserved cellular anatomy. Thus, despite casts known as Eospermatopteris from Middle Devonian strata of fragmentary evidence that radially aligned xylem cells in some New York State. Cladoxylopsid trunk structure comprised a more-or- partially preserved cladoxylopsid fossils may indicate a limited form less distinct cylinder of numerous separate cauline xylem strands of secondary growth (4, 7, 11, 15, 16), it remains unclear how this connected internally with a network of medullary xylem strands type of plant dramatically increased its girth. -
Abandoned Settlements Village / Type When Abandoned History Population Former Occupations Remarks Settlement
Abandoned settlements village / type when abandoned history population former occupations remarks settlement Afonikha shown on map as unpopulated place Arkhipovo relocation During the 1950s Appeared during the 2nd half of the 1905: 4 houses Main occupations were (Arkhipovskiy) village of the settlement inhabitants moved to 19th Century at the site of an Old 1922: 7 houses, 30 fishing and hunting Oma village soviet on the right the village Vizhas Believers’ settlement inhabitants side of the Vizhas river, 110 km from the river mouth Bedovoe village 3 In the 1960s the Appeared at the boundary of the 15th 1574: 4 sheds Fishery, transportation, Village of the Pustozersk village was classified and 16th Century an occupational 1679: 5 houses of city cattle farming village soviet on the right bank as “unprosperous”; camp. people from of the Pechora river, 20 km inhabitants left to Old Believers lodged here, escaping Pustozersk, 15 men from Oksino. Monument neighbouring Pechora from prosecution by the official 1837: 34 men (1991) of fellow countrymen villages and Naryan- church. 1858: 21 houses, 130 who fell during World War II, Mar inhabitants author A.N.Markov 1903: 31 farms, 139 (A.I.Mamontov, inh., including 12 M.J.Ruzhnikov, A.N.Markov). Nenets 1922: 30 houses, 150 inh. 1936: 126 inhabitants 1950: 17 houses, 96 inh. Chupov relocation In the 1960s the Appeared in the 2nd half of the 19th 1905: 5 houses Main occupations were Settlement (Chupovskiy) of settlement village was classified Century. First settlers were the 1922: 8 houses, 39 inh. fishing, hunting, cattle the Omsk village soviet, on the as “unprosperous”; Chupov family from the Mezen area. -
Study on Arctic Lay and Traditional Knowledge
Study on Arctic Lay and Traditional Knowledge CONTRACT NUMBER MARE/2012/07 - Ref. No 3 Final Report June 2014 EUNETMAR Study on Arctic Lay and Traditional Knowledge This study was carried out by the following members of IMP . COGEA s.r.l. Leading company of EUNETMAR Rome - ITALY Via Po, 102, 00198 Roma www.cogea.it Tel: +39 06 85 37 351 e-mail: [email protected] CETMAR Bouzas-Vigo Pontevedra - SPAIN www.cetmar.org Disclaimer: This study reflects the opinions and findings of the consultants and in no way reflects or includes views of the European Union and its Member States or any of the European Union institutions. EUNETMAR Study on Arctic Lay and Traditional Knowledge Table of contents 0 Task Reminder ...................................................................................................................... 4 1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 6 3 Main difficulties encountered ............................................................................................... 7 4 LTK Themes .......................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 General introduction ............................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Theme I. Climate change Impacts, Mitigation