Classification, Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Time, And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Classification, Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Time, And The JapaneseSocietyJapanese Society for Plant Systematics ISSN 1346-7565 Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 56 (2): 111-126 (2005) Invited article and Classification,MolecularPhylogeny,DivergenceTime, Morphological Evolution of Pteridophytes with Notes on Heterospory and and Monophyletic ParaphyleticGroups MASAHIRO KATO* Department ofBiotogicat Sciences,Graduate Schoot ofScience,Universitv. of7bkyo, Hongo, 7bk)]o IJ3- O033, lapan Pteridophytes are free-sporing vascular land plants that evolutionarily link bryophytes and seed plants. Conventiona], group (taxon)-based hierarchic classifications ofptcridophytes using phenetic characters are briefiy reviewcd. Review is also made for recent trcc-based cladistic analyses and molecular phy- logenetic analyses with increasingly large data sets ofmultiplc genes (compared to single genes in pre- vious studies) and increasingly large numbers of spccies representing major groups of pteridophytes (compared to particular groups in previous studies), and it is cxtended to most recent analyses of esti- mating divergcnce times ofpteridephytes, These c]assifications, phylogenetics, and divergcncc time esti- mates have improved our understanding of the diversity and historical structure of pteridophytes. Heterospory is noted with referencc to its origins, endospory, fertilization, and dispersal. Finally, menophylctic and paraphyletic groups rccently proposed or re-recognized are briefly dcscribcd. Key words: classification, divergence timc estimate. fems,heterospory, molecular phylogcny, pteri- dophytcs. Morphological Classifications it a recent diversification, resulting in a total of about 12,OOO species, which may be primitive or Pteridophytes, like seed plants (gymnosperms and advanced. The species were classified in many difl angiosperms), are vascular land plants and also are ferent classificatien systems based on morphologi- similar to nonvascular bryophytes in the free-speringcal characters. Some of major classifications put reproduction, Evolutionarily they fo11owed bryo- fbrward in the 20th century are briefly noted here phytes and preceded seed plants. Thus, free-sporing ('lables 1, 2). vascular plants or pteridophytes in a broad sense Engler & Prantl (1902) classified pteridophytes have a long (420 million years) evolutionary histo- into fbur classes, Filicales, Sphenophyllales, ry, and on the other hand, like angiosperms, exhib- Equisetales and fycopodia]es, and subdivided the * PTesent address: Department of Botany, National Science Museum, Tsukuba 305-OO05, Japan e-mail address, [email protected] This article is fonned frem the presentation as one of contributions for the International Symposium 2004, Asian Plant Diversity and Systematics, held at Sakura, Chiba, Japan on July 29 - August 2, 2004, NII-Electronic Library Service The JapaneseSocietyJapanese Society for PlantPlantSystematics Systematics 112 APG Xlo1. 56 TABLE 1 . Classifications ofmajoT ptcridophytc groups proposed by sorne authors, based on cemparative morphology, Numbers indi- cate grouping in each classification and do not correspond among classifications. Engler & Prantt C1902) Verdooun (1938)Tagawa&Iwatsuki(1972)PichiSermolli(1977)Chmg{E97S)Tryon & TT)'on (1982) Krarner & Green (1990) 1,Lycopodiales 1,Lycopodiinae 1.Lycopsida 1.Lycephytina 1,Lycephytina1.Lycoodiepsida 1.Lycopodiatae 1-1.Ligulatae 1-1-t.Se]aginellineae1-1.Selaginel]ales1-1.Se]agine]]ales 1-1.Selaginel[ales1-1.SeiaginellRlesl-1,Selaginellales1-1,Selaginellales 1-I-2.Isoetineae l-2.Isoetales 1-2.Isoetales 1-2,Jsoetales 1-2. Lycopodia]cs ]-2, Isoctales 1-2,lsoetales 1-2.Eligulatae 1-2-1.LycopDdincac 1-3.Lycopodia]es1-3.Lycopodiales 1-3.Lycopodjales 2.Isocphytina 1-3.Lycopodiales1-3,Lycepodiales 1-2-2.Psilotineae 2.Psi]ophytinae 2,Psi]opsida 2,?sjophytina 3,Psjophytina 2.Psilotatae 2.Equiestales 3.Articulatae 3,Equisetopsida 3.Sphenophytina4, Sphenophytina 2.Equisetopsida 3.Equisetatae 3,SphenophylLates 4.Filica]es 4. Filicinae 4.Pteropsida 4.Filicophytina 5.Fi]icophytina3.Fiticopsida 4.Filicatae (incl.Psilotaceae) Extinct group included in Equisetopsida in other classifications, TABi.E 2. Classifications ofmajor fern groups proposed by some authors, based on comparative morphology. Numbers indicate group- ing in each classification and do not correspond among classifications. Christellsen(l938)Cepeland(1947)Tagawa&iwatsuki(1972)PichiSermolli(1977)Ching{IY7S) Tryon&Tryen(1982) 1,Eusporangiatae 1.Eusporangiopsida 1,Polypodiidae 1-].Ophioglossales ] . Qphioglossales1.0phioglossales 1,Ophioglossopsida 1-1,Ophioglossales 1-1.0phioglossales 1-2,Maradiaies 2.Marattiales 2.Maraniales 2.Marattiepsida 1-2.Marattia]es 1-2.Marattiales 2,Leptosporangiatae3. FiHcales 3.Filicales 3,Fllicopsida 2,Protoleptosporangiopsida1-3.PojypodiaLes 2-1.Filicales 3-].Osmundjclae 3.Leptosporangiopsida t-3-1.Po]ypodiineae 3-2,Plagiogyriidae 3-t,Po]ypodiales 3-3.Gleicheniidae 3-4.Schizaeidae 3-5,Hymenophyllidae 2-2, Salviniales 4. Salviniales 3-6,Salvinlidae 3-2,Salviniales t-3-2.Salviniineae 5.Marsileales 3-1,MarsiTeidae 3-3,Marslleales 1-3-3.Marsiteineae 2. Psilotidae class Filicales into three orders, Filicales leptospo- and in total 14 families including the Iarge family rangiatae (suborders Eufilicineae and Hydro- Polypodiaceae with 15 subfamilies. Ching (1940) "Polypodiaceae" pteridineae), Maiattiales and Ophioglossales, and the classified into 33 families and rec- "Poly- class Lycopodiales into two orders Lycopodiales ognized five series in the polyphyletic eligulatae including suborder Psilotineae and podiaceae" in the context of phylogeny, Ching Lycepodiales ligulatae with suborders Selaginetli-(1978) classified Chinese pteridophytes (division neae and Isoetineae, Christensen's (1905, 1913- Pteridophyta) into five subdivisions: subdiv, 1934) Index Filicum and supplements I-III enu- Lycophytina comprising orders Lycopodiales and merated all fern species ofthe world described, In SeJaginellales, three monotypic subdiv, Isoephytina, his systematic classification of ferns Christensen Sphenophytina and Psilophytina, and subdiv. (1938) recognized two series (Filices EusporangiataeFilicophytina comprising three classes (Eusporan- and Filices Leptosporangiatae), two orders giopsida [orders Ophioglossales and Marattiales], Ophioglossales and Marattiales in the former series Protoleptosporangiopsida [Osmundales], and and two orders Filicales and Salviniales in the latteg Leptosporangiopsida [Polypodiales or Filicales, NII-Electronic Library Service The JapaneseSocietyJapanese Society for Plant Systematics August 2005 KPLTO: PteridophyLe phylogeny and evelution 113 Marsileales, Salviniales]). In Genera Filicum (suborders Polypodiineae, Marsileineae, and Copeland (1 947) recognized orders Ophioglossales Salviniineae), and divided Lycopodiopsida into (1 family), Marattiales (1 family), and Filicales (19 bycopodiales, Selaginellales and Isoetalcs. Ttyon & families including Marsileaceae and Salviniaceae), Tryon (1982) included Psilotaceae in Filicopsida Holttum (1949) classified leptosporangiate ferns (ferns) based on BierhorsVs (1977 and references into 14 families including the large family Denn- cited therein) morphological and anatomical results staedtiaceae with 1 1 subfamilies and proposed three and spore wall characters. phylegenetic lineages, ofwhich one is terrninated by In short, the classifications based on phenetic rlagawa Dennstaedtiaceae. & Iwatsuki (1972) adopt- characters usually recognized four major groups ed the conventional classification ofpteridophytes of living pteridophytes, among which ferns were into four classes Psiopsida, Lycopsida, Equiset- divided into Marattiales, Ophioglossales and opsida, and Pteropsida. They classjfied Pteropsida Filicales, although certain groups (e.g., Psilotaceae into erders Ophioglossales, Marattiales, Filicalcs, and aquatic ferns) were assigned to different groups Marsileales, and Salviniales. [lagawa & Iwatsuki ofhigher ranks or treated at different ranks ([lables (1972) recognized in total 34 families for pterido- 1, 2). Characters that are infbrmative throughout phytes of Thailand. Pichi Sermolli (1977) classified pteridophytes are not many. Those classifications Pteridophyta into fbur subdivisions, Lycophytina, with hierarchic ranks are generally taxon-based and Sphenophytina, Psilophytina, and Filicophytina, have usually not been given statistically analyzed The first three were monotypic each with single interrelationships of families. classes, while the last Filicophytina comprised three classes, Ophioglossopsida, Marattiopsida and Molecular Phylogenies Filicopsida. Pichi Sermolli (1977) assigned 58 of64 families to Filicopsida, 3 to Lycopsida, 1 to Achievement ofmelecular phylogeny, which is dis- Equisetopsida, and 2 to Psilotopsida. Kramer & played as a phylegenetic tree, succeeded long con- Green (1990) compiled contributions to pterido- tributions of systematics, classifications, and fio- phyte classification and presented a similar classi- ras based on phenetic or morphological characters, fication system of four classes Psilotatae (1 family), as noted above, Molecular analyses with large data Lycopodiatae (3 families), Equisetatae (1 family), sets dealing with all or most pteridophyte groups and Filicatae (33 families). Among families of have been explosive since the middle 1990s. One Filicatae, affinities were suggested between year later than Chase et al.'s (1993) epoch-making Dipteridaceae and Cheiropleuriaceae; Vittariaceaestudy on angiosperm phylogeny using a large data and Pteridaceae; tree fern families; Lomariopsida-
Recommended publications
  • 1 5 Chapter 1 Introduction I. LIFE CYCLES and DIVERSITY of VASCULAR PLANTS the Subjects of This Thesis Are the Pteri
    Chapter 1-15 Chapter 1 Introduction I. LIFE CYCLES AND DIVERSITY OF VASCULAR PLANTS The subjects of this thesis are the pteridophytes and seed plants that are conventionally classified as the vascular plants or tracheophytes. Vascular plants were traditionally defined by the possession of specialized conducting tissues, called phloem and xylem. Mosses are now believed to have inherited their conducting tissues from a common ancestor with the tracheophytes (Mishler & Churchill 1984) but are not considered in this thesis. Vascular plants can be divided into four groups with respect to life cycle. These groups are homosporous pteridophytes, heterosporous pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms. This is not intended to be a phylogenetic classification. There are about a quarter of a million species of vascular plant alive today. The vast majority are angiosperms and most of the remainder are homosporous pteridophytes. Heterosporous pteridophytes and gymnosperms contribute only a small number of species (Table 1.1). TABLE 1.1 Estimated number of extant species in each of the major groups of vascular plants (data from Parker 1982). Homosporous pteridophytes 12,000 species Heterosporous pteridophytes <1,000 species Gymnosperms <1,000 species Angiosperms >200,000 species A. Homosporous pteridophytes Homosporous pteridophytes produce a single type of spore. Spores are dispersed and develop into photosynthetic or mycoparasitic gametophytes. A gametophyte's gender is indeterminate at the time of spore dispersal, and a single gametophyte may produce eggs and/or sperm. Sperm are motile, and require free water to fertilize eggs. The young sporophyte is nourished by the maternal gametophyte during early development but later becomes Chapter 1-16 nutritionally independent.
    [Show full text]
  • RI Equisetopsida and Lycopodiopsida.Indd
    IIntroductionntroduction byby FFrancisrancis UnderwoodUnderwood Rhode Island Equisetopsida, Lycopodiopsida and Isoetopsida Special Th anks to the following for giving permission for the use their images. Robbin Moran New York Botanical Garden George Yatskievych and Ann Larson Missouri Botanical Garden Jan De Laet, plantsystematics.org Th is pdf is a companion publication to Rhode Island Equisetopsida, Lycopodiopsida & Isoetopsida at among-ri-wildfl owers.org Th e Elfi n Press 2016 Introduction Formerly known as fern allies, Horsetails, Club-mosses, Fir-mosses, Spike-mosses and Quillworts are plants that have an alternate generation life-cycle similar to ferns, having both sporophyte and gametophyte stages. Equisetopsida Horsetails date from the Devonian period (416 to 359 million years ago) in earth’s history where they were trees up to 110 feet in height and helped to form the coal deposits of the Carboniferous period. Only one genus has survived to modern times (Equisetum). Horsetails Horsetails (Equisetum) have jointed stems with whorls of thin narrow leaves. In the sporophyte stage, they have a sterile and fertile form. Th ey produce only one type of spore. While the gametophytes produced from the spores appear to be plentiful, the successful reproduction of the sporophyte form is low with most Horsetails reproducing vegetatively. Lycopodiopsida Lycopodiopsida includes the clubmosses (Dendrolycopodium, Diphasiastrum, Lycopodiella, Lycopodium , Spinulum) and Fir-mosses (Huperzia) Clubmosses Clubmosses are evergreen plants that produce only microspores that develop into a gametophyte capable of producing both sperm and egg cells. Club-mosses can produce the spores either in leaf axils or at the top of their stems. Th e spore capsules form in a cone-like structures (strobili) at the top of the plants.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ophioglossidae (PDF, 873
    Ophioglossidae 1 Polypodiopsida Ophioglossidae – Gabelblattgewächse (Polypodiopsida) Zu den Ophioglossidae werden 2 rezente Ordnungen gestellt, die Psilotales (Gabelfarne) und die Ophioglossales (Natternzungenartigen). Die Ophioglossidae sind eine sehr alte Landpflanzengruppe. Die Blätter sind, anders als dies für viele makrophylle Farnpflanzen typisch ist, zu Beginn nicht eingerollt. Ein gemeinsames Merkmal der Psilotales mit den Ophioglossales sind eusporangiate Sporangien, d. h. die Sporangienwand weist mehrere Zellschichten auf (Unterschied lepto- sporangiate Farne, hier einschichtig). Bei einigen Arten der Psilotales fehlt eine echte Wurzel. Alle Arten sind mykotroph (Ernährung mittels Pilzsymbiose im Boden, Mykorrhiza). 1. Ordnung: Psilotales (Gabelfarne) 1.1 Systematik und Verbreitung Die Ordnung der Psilotales enthält nur 1 Familie, die Psilotaceae mit nur 2 Gattungen und 17 Arten (Psilotum 2 und Tmesipteris 15 Arten). Die Familie ist überwiegend tropisch verbreitet. 1.2 Morphologie 1.2.1 Habitus Die Arten der Psilotales sind ausschließlich krautige Pflanzen mit einem kräftigen, unterirdischen Kriechspross (Rhizom), das zahlreiche Rhizoide ausbildet. Echte Wurzeln fehlen. Die vollständige Reduktion der Wurzel wird hier als sekundäres, abgeleitetes Merkmal angesehen. Wie der Gametophyt ist auch der Sporophyt mykotroph, was erst die morphologische Reduktion der Wurzel erlaubte. Die oberirdischen sparrig dichotom verzweigten Sprossachsen weisen eine (angedeutete) Siphonostele mit einem holzigen Mark auf. Die unterirdischen Rhizome haben hingegen eine Protostele. 1.2.2 Blatt Arten aus den Psilotales haben ausschließlich schraubig angeordnete Mikrophylle. Bei Psilotum sind nur die Sporophylle Gabelblätter (im Unterschied zu den sterilen © PD DR. VEIT M. DÖRKEN, Universität Konstanz, FB Biologie Ophioglossidae 2 Polypodiopsida Blättern). Die Photosynthese erfolgt daher hauptsächlich über die chlorophyllreichen Sprossachsen (Rutenstrauch-Prinzip). Abb. 1 & 2: Psilotum nudum, dichotom verzweigte Sprossachse (links); Querschnitt einer Sprossachse (rechts).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Botany. Lecture 29
    Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Introduction to Botany. Lecture 29 Alexey Shipunov Minot State University November 12th, 2010 Shipunov BIOL 154.29 Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Outline 1 Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Bryophyta: mosses Pteridophyta: ferns and allies Shipunov BIOL 154.29 Bryophyta: mosses Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Pteridophyta: ferns and allies Life cycle of mosses (picture from the board) Shipunov BIOL 154.29 Bryophyta: mosses Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Pteridophyta: ferns and allies Three main groups (subphyla) Hepaticae—liverworts. Three classes, most primitive are Haplomitriopsida. Body has dorsal and ventral parts, sporogon bag-like, without columella, spores with elaters. Bryophytina—true mosses. Six classes, most important are Sphagnopsida (peat mosses), Polytrichopsida (haircap mosses) and Bryopsida. Body radial, sporogon long, with columella, spores without elaters. Anthocerotophytina—hornworts. One class. Body flattened, sporogon long, green, with columella and stomata, spores with elaters. Shipunov BIOL 154.29 Bryophyta: mosses Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Pteridophyta: ferns and allies Haplomitrium gibbsiae, primitive liverwort Shipunov BIOL 154.29 Bryophyta: mosses Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Pteridophyta: ferns and allies Elaters of liverworts (Lepidozia sp.) Shipunov BIOL 154.29 Bryophyta: mosses Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Pteridophyta: ferns and allies Sphagnum sp. (Bryophyta, Sphagnopsida) with sporogons Shipunov BIOL 154.29 Bryophyta: mosses Kingdom Vegetabilia: plants Pteridophyta: ferns and allies Dawsonia
    [Show full text]
  • S1. List of Taxa Included in the Disparity Analysis and the Phylogenetic Alysis, with Main References
    S1. List of taxa included in the disparity analysis and the phylogenetic alysis, with main references. Taxa in bold are included in the phylogenetic analysis; taxa also indicated by * are included only in the phylogenetic analysis and not in the disparity analysis. Three unpublished arborescent taxa were included on the basis that they showed additional anatomical diversity. 1 Callixylon trunk from the Late Devonian of Marrocco showing large sclerotic nests in pith; 2 Axis from the late Tournaisian of Algeria, previously figured in Galtier (1988), and Galtier & Meyer-Berthaud (2006); 3 Trunk from the late Viséan of Australia. All these specimens and corresponding slides are currently kept in the Paleobotanical collections, Service des Collections, Université Montpellier II, France, under the specimen numbers 600/2/3, JC874 and YB1-2. Main reference Psilophyton* Banks et al., 1975 Aneurophytales Rellimia thomsonii Dannenhoffer & Bonamo, 2003; --- Dannenhoffer et al., 2007. Tetraxylopteris schmidtii Beck, 1957. Proteokalon petryi Scheckler & Banks, 1971. Triloboxylon arnoldii Stein & Beck, 1983. s m Archaeopteridales Callixylon brownii Hoskin & Cross, 1951. r e Callixylon erianum Arnold, 1930. p s o Callixylon huronensis Chitaley & Cai, 2001. n Callixylon newberry Arnold, 1931. m y g Callixylon trifilievii Lemoigne et al., 1983. o r Callixylon zalesskyi Arnold, 1930. P Callixylon sp. Meyer-Berthaud, unpublished data1. Eddya sullivanensis Beck, 1967. Protopityales Protopitys buchiana Scott, 1923; Galtier et al., 1998. P. scotica Walton, 1957. Protopitys sp. Decombeix et al., 2005. Elkinsiales Elkinsia polymorpha Serbet & Rothwell, 1992. Buteoxylales Buteoxylon gordonianum Barnard &Long, 1973; Matten et al., --- 1980. Triradioxylon primaevum Barnard & Long, 1975. Lyginopteridales Laceya hibernica May & Matten, 1983. Tristichia longii Galtier, 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • Earliest Record of Megaphylls and Leafy Structures, and Their Initial Diversification
    Review Geology August 2013 Vol.58 No.23: 27842793 doi: 10.1007/s11434-013-5799-x Earliest record of megaphylls and leafy structures, and their initial diversification HAO ShouGang* & XUE JinZhuang Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Received January 14, 2013; accepted February 26, 2013; published online April 10, 2013 Evolutionary changes in the structure of leaves have had far-reaching effects on the anatomy and physiology of vascular plants, resulting in morphological diversity and species expansion. People have long been interested in the question of the nature of the morphology of early leaves and how they were attained. At least five lineages of euphyllophytes can be recognized among the Early Devonian fossil plants (Pragian age, ca. 410 Ma ago) of South China. Their different leaf precursors or “branch-leaf com- plexes” are believed to foreshadow true megaphylls with different venation patterns and configurations, indicating that multiple origins of megaphylls had occurred by the Early Devonian, much earlier than has previously been recognized. In addition to megaphylls in euphyllophytes, the laminate leaf-like appendages (sporophylls or bracts) occurred independently in several dis- tantly related Early Devonian plant lineages, probably as a response to ecological factors such as high atmospheric CO2 concen- trations. This is a typical example of convergent evolution in early plants. Early Devonian, euphyllophyte, megaphyll, leaf-like appendage, branch-leaf complex Citation: Hao S G, Xue J Z. Earliest record of megaphylls and leafy structures, and their initial diversification. Chin Sci Bull, 2013, 58: 27842793, doi: 10.1007/s11434- 013-5799-x The origin and evolution of leaves in vascular plants was phology and evolutionary diversification of early leaves of one of the most important evolutionary events affecting the basal euphyllophytes remain enigmatic.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrids in the Fern Genus Osmunda (Osmundaceae)
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. B, 35(2), pp. 63–69, June 22, 2009 Hybrids in the Fern Genus Osmunda (Osmundaceae) Masahiro Kato Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Amakubo 4–1–1, Tsukuba, 305–0005 Japan E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract Four described putative hybrids in genus Osmunda, O. intermedia from Japan, O. rug- gii from eastern U.S.A., O. nipponica from central Japan, and O. mildei from southern China, are enumerated with notes on their hybridity. It is suggested that Osmunda intermedia is an intrasub- generic hybrid (O. japonica of subgenus Osmunda ϫ O. lancea of subgenus Osmunda), O. ruggii is an intersubgeneric hybrid (O. regalis of subgenus Osmunda ϫ O. claytoniana of subgenus Clay- tosmunda), O. nipponica is an intersubgeneric hybrid (O. japonica ϫ O. claytoniana of subgenus Claytosmunda), and O. midlei is an intersubgeneric hybrid (O. japonica ϫ O. angustifolia or O. vachellii of subgenus Plenasium). Among the four, O. intermedia is the most widely distributed and can reproduce in culture, suggesting that it can reproduce to some extent in nature. Key words : Hybrid, Osmunda intermedia, Osmunda mildei, Osmunda nipponica, Osmunda rug- gii. three subgenera Claytosmunda, Osmunda, and Introduction Plenasium, genus Leptopteris, genus Todea, and The genus Osmunda has been classified in ei- genus Osmundastrum (see also Metzgar et al., ther the broad or narrow sense. In the previously 2008). most accepted and the most lumping classifica- Four putative hybrids are known in the genus tion, it was divided into three subgenera, Osmun- Osmunda s.l. in eastern U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Botany. Lecture 35
    Questions and answers Spermatophyta, seed plants Introduction to Botany. Lecture 35 Alexey Shipunov Minot State University November 28, 2011 Shipunov BIOL 154.35 Questions and answers Spermatophyta, seed plants Outline 1 Questions and answers 2 Spermatophyta, seed plants Classes of seed plants Conifers Gnetophytes Shipunov BIOL 154.35 Questions and answers Spermatophyta, seed plants Outline 1 Questions and answers 2 Spermatophyta, seed plants Classes of seed plants Conifers Gnetophytes Shipunov BIOL 154.35 Leaves-emergencies Leaves of lycopods Questions and answers Spermatophyta, seed plants Previous final question: the answer What are microphylls? Shipunov BIOL 154.35 Questions and answers Spermatophyta, seed plants Previous final question: the answer What are microphylls? Leaves-emergencies Leaves of lycopods Shipunov BIOL 154.35 Questions and answers Spermatophyta, seed plants Pteridophyta classes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Lycopodiopsida 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 Equisetopsida 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Psilotopsida 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Ophioglossopsida 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Marattiopsida 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Pteridopsida 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Big (> 1,000 species); 2 Megaphyllous; 3 Synangia; 4 Strobilus; 5 Leptosporangia; 6 Terrestrial gametophyte; 7 Biflagellate sperm; 8 Roots; 9 Fronds; 10 Reduced leaves (enatia and scales). Characters are not necessary relevant to all members of class. Shipunov BIOL 154.35 Classes of seed plants Questions and answers Conifers Spermatophyta, seed plants Gnetophytes Spermatophyta, seed plants Classes of seed plants Shipunov BIOL 154.35 Classes of seed plants Questions and answers Conifers Spermatophyta, seed plants Gnetophytes Spermatophyta: seed plants ≈ 600 species of non-angiosperms and ≈ 250; 000 species of angiosperms Sporic life cycle with sporophyte predominance and seed Gametophyte is reduced to cells inside ovule or inside pollen grain.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of New Zealand Ferns and Lycophytes Davalliaceae Pj
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES DAVALLIACEAE P.J. BROWNSEY & L.R. PERRIE Fascicle 22 – OCTOBER 2018 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2018. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: “Source: Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research” Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: “Sourced from Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research” See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Brownsey, P. J. (Patrick John), 1948– Flora of New Zealand : ferns and lycophytes. Fascicle 22, Davalliaceae / P.J. Brownsey and L.R. Perrie. -- Lincoln, N.Z.: Manaaki Whenua Press, 2018. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-9 47525-44-6 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34761-6 (set) 1.Ferns -- New Zealand – Identification. I. Perrie, L. R. (Leon Richard). II. Title. III. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.394.742(931) DC 587.30993 DOI: 10.7931/B15W42 This work should be cited as: Brownsey, P.J. & Perrie, L.R. 2018: Davalliaceae. In: Breitwieser, I.; Wilton, A.D. Flora of New Zealand – Ferns and Lycophytes. Fascicle 22. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/B15W42 Cover image: Davallia griffithiana. Habit of plant, spreading by means of long-creeping rhizomes. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomic Position of the Psilotales in the Light of Our Knowledge of Devonian Plant Life*
    THE TAXONOMIC POSITION OF THE PSILOTALES IN THE LIGHT OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF DEVONIAN PLANT LIFE* F. P. JONKER Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht, The Netherlands ABSTRACT exclusively Devonian Psilophytales and of the latter the Rhyniaceae are regarded The order Psilotales, containing the two recent genera Psilatum and Tnzesiptel'is only, is usually usually as the closest relatives. Among classified by taxonomists and palaeo botanists those who take this st?nd I mention G. M. in the phylum Psiiophyta. This concept is, Smith (1955), Magdefra.u in Strasburger in spite of the synangia, based on the primitive (1971) and Lcmoigne (1968c). The concept general appearance reminding one of that of the of the last mentioned author will be dis• Devonian Rhyniaceae. Numerous attempts have been made to derive both genera, including their cussed further on. Darrah (1960) states synangia, from either the Rhvniaceae or from other that the status of the putative primitive Psilophyta. These attempts' sometimes led to the nature of the plant body in the Psilotaceae acceptance of a series of missing Jinks but this concept is, however, not supported bv palaeo· is controversial although there is a strong botanical data. tendency to accept the family as a pel'sis• In the opinion of the present reporter the order tent remnant of the Psilopsida. Andrews has kept a primitive general appearance of its (1961) states that Psilatum has been reaarded Devonian ancestors but in its synangia and in its monolete spores it is more advanced. by some botanists as a very simpl~ land In its anatomy, its microphyllous leaves, and in its plant, possibly a very ancient type that gametophyte perhaps, it shows more affiinity to the has managed to survive for several hundreds phylum Lycopodiophyta.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Cladoxylopsid Trees Resolve Enigma of the Earth's Earliest Forest Stumps at Gilboa
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6385893 Giant cladoxylopsid trees resolve enigma of the Earth's earliest forest stumps at Gilboa Article in Nature · May 2007 DOI: 10.1038/nature05705 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 91 254 5 authors, including: Frank Mannolini Linda VanAller Hernick New York State Museum New York State Museum 8 PUBLICATIONS 160 CITATIONS 9 PUBLICATIONS 253 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Ed Landing Christopher Berry New York State Museum Cardiff University 244 PUBLICATIONS 3,365 CITATIONS 48 PUBLICATIONS 862 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Ed Landing on 06 February 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Vol 446 | 19 April 2007 | doi:10.1038/nature05705 LETTERS Giant cladoxylopsid trees resolve the enigma of the Earth’s earliest forest stumps at Gilboa William E. Stein1, Frank Mannolini2, Linda VanAller Hernick2, Ed Landing2 & Christopher M. Berry3 The evolution of trees of modern size growing together in forests Middle Devonian (Eifelian) into the Carboniferous, were major fundamentally changed terrestrial ecosystems1–3. The oldest trees contributors to floras worldwide14. Traditionally considered inter- are often thought to be of latest Devonian age (about 380–360 Myr mediate between Lower Devonian vascular plants and ferns or old) as indicated by the widespread occurrence of Archaeopteris sphenopsids, we do not yet understand these plants well enough to (Progymnospermopsida)4.
    [Show full text]
  • Polypodiaceae (PDF)
    This PDF version does not have an ISBN or ISSN and is not therefore effectively published (Melbourne Code, Art. 29.1). The printed version, however, was effectively published on 6 June 2013. Zhang, X. C., S. G. Lu, Y. X. Lin, X. P. Qi, S. Moore, F. W. Xing, F. G. Wang, P. H. Hovenkamp, M. G. Gilbert, H. P. Nooteboom, B. S. Parris, C. Haufler, M. Kato & A. R. Smith. 2013. Polypodiaceae. Pp. 758–850 in Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven & D. Y. Hong, eds., Flora of China, Vol. 2–3 (Pteridophytes). Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. POLYPODIACEAE 水龙骨科 shui long gu ke Zhang Xianchun (张宪春)1, Lu Shugang (陆树刚)2, Lin Youxing (林尤兴)3, Qi Xinping (齐新萍)4, Shannjye Moore (牟善杰)5, Xing Fuwu (邢福武)6, Wang Faguo (王发国)6; Peter H. Hovenkamp7, Michael G. Gilbert8, Hans P. Nooteboom7, Barbara S. Parris9, Christopher Haufler10, Masahiro Kato11, Alan R. Smith12 Plants mostly epiphytic and epilithic, a few terrestrial. Rhizomes shortly to long creeping, dictyostelic, bearing scales. Fronds monomorphic or dimorphic, mostly simple to pinnatifid or 1-pinnate (uncommonly more divided); stipes cleanly abscising near their bases or not (most grammitids), leaving short phyllopodia; veins often anastomosing or reticulate, sometimes with included veinlets, or veins free (most grammitids); indument various, of scales, hairs, or glands. Sori abaxial (rarely marginal), orbicular to oblong or elliptic, occasionally elongate, or sporangia acrostichoid, sometimes deeply embedded, sori exindusiate, sometimes covered by cadu- cous scales (soral paraphyses) when young; sporangia with 1–3-rowed, usually long stalks, frequently with paraphyses on sporangia or on receptacle; spores hyaline to yellowish, reniform, and monolete (non-grammitids), or greenish and globose-tetrahedral, trilete (most grammitids); perine various, usually thin, not strongly winged or cristate.
    [Show full text]