1 Ophioglossidae (PDF, 873
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A High Polyploid Chromosome Complement of Ophioglossum Nudicaule L
© 2007 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 72(2): 161–164, 2007 A High Polyploid Chromosome Complement of Ophioglossum nudicaule L. f. Marunnan Faseena and John Ernest Thoppil* Genetics and Plant breeding Division, Department of Botany, University of Calicut,Pin Code-673635, Kerala, India Received January 9, 2007; accepted January 31, 2007 Summary The diploid (2nϭ720) and haploid (2nϭ360) chromosome numbers were determined in Ophioglossum nudicaule. The somatic chromosome count was made on the plant for the first time. O. nudicaule is a very high polyploid plant, either exhibiting 48-ploidy, if the basic chromosome ϭ ϭ number is x2 15 or a 24-ploid, originating from the basic chromosome number of x3 30. Key words Ophioglossum nudicaule, Ophioglossaceae, Mitosis, Meiosis, Polyploidy, Basic chro- mosome number. Ophioglossum nudicaule L. f. (Slender Adder’s tongue) belongs to Ophioglossaceae, a family of primitive ferns. It is a tiny terrestrial herb found in dense patches on the thin soil cover over lat- erite boulders in open areas, roadside ditches and lawns. It is distributed throughout Mexico, West Indies, Central America, South America, Asia, Africa and Pacific Islands. In Kerala, it is common in hills and rocky areas all over the Malabar plains and Munnar (Kumar 1998). Previous studies re- port that homosporous ferns show extremely high chromosome numbers. In O. nudicaule different chromosome numbers, viz. nϭ120 (Ninan 1958), nϭ240 (Ninan 1956, Manickam 1984) and nϭ360 (Ghatak 1977) have been reported. So the present investigation is an attempt to find out the exact somatic and gametic chromosome numbers of O. nudicaule. Materials and methods In the present investigation, O. -
Ophioglossaceae)
A preliminary revision of the Indo-Pacific species of Ophioglossum (Ophioglossaceae) J.H. Wieffering Rijksherbarium, Leyden INTRODUCTION the of Clausen The differences between most recent complete treatment this genus by and the of a rather fundamental (1938) present revision are, I think, nature. For, though the number of characters Dr Clausen and myselfagree that in troublesometaxa, ‘the small has forced workers base conclusions often trivial .... .... to concerning species on details such leaf characters which be as cutting and size, would not ordinarily considered of fundamental in other from there have followed importance groups’ (l.c. p. 5), on we these characters a different train of thought. Clausen stated (l.c. p. 6) that ‘If were not criteria for it would be reduce the small adopted as species, necessary to species to a very number and the which thereby remove opportunity to keep apart populations appear to be really distinct enough, but for which the characters available for species differen- tiation do not seem fundamental.’ This close comes very to Prantl’s critics (1884, 300) on Luerssen’s treatise where he ob sie the forms which stated: “.... so scheint die Frage, (i.e. Luerssen brought together under O. vulgatum) als Vatietätenoder als ebensoviele Arten zu bezeichnen sein, von untergeordneter Bedeutung zu sein Es gibt eine grosse Anzahl von Sammlern, Floristen etc., deren wissenschaftliches Bedürfnis befriedigt ist, wenn sie auf Etiquetten oder in Katalogen einen aus zwei Worten bestehenden Namen schreiben können; auf ‘Varietäten’ wird eine Rücksicht in der Regel nicht genommen.” In order to facilitate studies based these determinations Prantl then chose small geographical on to accept a species concept. -
Adder's Tongue Fern, Ophioglossum Pusillum
Natural Heritage Adder’s Tongue Fern & Endangered Species Ophioglossum pusillum Raf. Program www.mass.gov/nhesp State Status: Threatened Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife DESCRIPTION: Adder’s Tongue Fern is a small terrestrial fern, up to 30 cm (12 in) high, consisting of a single fleshy green stalk (stipe) bearing a simple leaf and a fertile spike. The stipe arises from fleshy, cod-like rhizomes and roots. About midway up the stipe is the pale green leaf, approximately 15 cm (6 in), narrowly oval to oblong. In var. pseudopodium (false foot), the widespread form, the blade gradually tapers for about 1/3 to 2/3 of its length to a narrow, 1-2 cm base that continues to run down the lower stipe. There is a finely indented network of interconnecting veins. The stipe extends well beyond the leaf blade and is terminated by a short, pale green, narrow fertile spike from 1-4 cm long and up to 5 mm wide, which consists of 2 tightly packed rows of rounded sporangia (spore cases) on the margins of the spike axis. There can be a large variation in the size, shape, and position of the blade, as well as of the fertile spike; occurrences of two fronds (leaves) per rootstalk have been observed. The plant appears anytime after early June. Distribution in Massachusetts 1985 - 2010 Based on records in the Natural Heritage Database Photo: B. Legler, USDA Forest Service. Drawing: USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database / Britton, N.L., and A. Brown. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British Possessions. -
The Taxonomic Position of the Psilotales in the Light of Our Knowledge of Devonian Plant Life*
THE TAXONOMIC POSITION OF THE PSILOTALES IN THE LIGHT OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF DEVONIAN PLANT LIFE* F. P. JONKER Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht, The Netherlands ABSTRACT exclusively Devonian Psilophytales and of the latter the Rhyniaceae are regarded The order Psilotales, containing the two recent genera Psilatum and Tnzesiptel'is only, is usually usually as the closest relatives. Among classified by taxonomists and palaeo botanists those who take this st?nd I mention G. M. in the phylum Psiiophyta. This concept is, Smith (1955), Magdefra.u in Strasburger in spite of the synangia, based on the primitive (1971) and Lcmoigne (1968c). The concept general appearance reminding one of that of the of the last mentioned author will be dis• Devonian Rhyniaceae. Numerous attempts have been made to derive both genera, including their cussed further on. Darrah (1960) states synangia, from either the Rhvniaceae or from other that the status of the putative primitive Psilophyta. These attempts' sometimes led to the nature of the plant body in the Psilotaceae acceptance of a series of missing Jinks but this concept is, however, not supported bv palaeo· is controversial although there is a strong botanical data. tendency to accept the family as a pel'sis• In the opinion of the present reporter the order tent remnant of the Psilopsida. Andrews has kept a primitive general appearance of its (1961) states that Psilatum has been reaarded Devonian ancestors but in its synangia and in its monolete spores it is more advanced. by some botanists as a very simpl~ land In its anatomy, its microphyllous leaves, and in its plant, possibly a very ancient type that gametophyte perhaps, it shows more affiinity to the has managed to survive for several hundreds phylum Lycopodiophyta. -
Curitiba, Southern Brazil
data Data Descriptor Herbarium of the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (HUCP), Curitiba, Southern Brazil Rodrigo A. Kersten 1,*, João A. M. Salesbram 2 and Luiz A. Acra 3 1 Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, School of Life Sciences, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil 2 REFLORA Project, Curitiba, Brazil; [email protected] 3 Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, School of Life Sciences, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-41-3721-2392 Academic Editor: Martin M. Gossner Received: 22 November 2016; Accepted: 5 February 2017; Published: 10 February 2017 Abstract: The main objective of this paper is to present the herbarium of the Pontifical Catholic University of Parana’s and its collection. The history of the HUCP had its beginning in the middle of the 1970s with the foundation of the Biology Museum that gathered both botanical and zoological specimens. In April 1979 collections were separated and the HUCP was founded with preserved specimens of algae (green, red, and brown), fungi, and embryophytes. As of October 2016, the collection encompasses nearly 25,000 specimens from 4934 species, 1609 genera, and 297 families. Most of the specimens comes from the state of Paraná but there were also specimens from many Brazilian states and other countries, mainly from South America (Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, and Colombia) but also from other parts of the world (Cuba, USA, Spain, Germany, China, and Australia). Our collection includes 42 fungi, 258 gymnosperms, 299 bryophytes, 2809 pteridophytes, 3158 algae, 17,832 angiosperms, and only one type of Mimosa (Mimosa tucumensis Barneby ex Ribas, M. -
Flora of South Australia 5Th Edition | Edited by Jürgen Kellermann
Flora of South Australia 5th Edition | Edited by Jürgen Kellermann KEY TO FAMILIES1 J.P. Jessop2 The sequence of families used in this Flora follows closely the one adopted by the Australian Plant Census (www.anbg.gov. au/chah/apc), which in turn is based on that of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG III 2009) and Mabberley’s Plant Book (Mabberley 2008). It differs from previous editions of the Flora, which were mainly based on the classification system of Engler & Gilg (1919). A list of all families recognised in this Flora is printed in the inside cover pages with families already published highlighted in bold. The up-take of this new system by the State Herbarium of South Australia is still in progress and the S.A. Census database (www.flora.sa.gov.au/census.shtml) still uses the old classification of families. The Australian Plant Census web-site presents comparison tables of the old and new systems on family and genus level. A good overview of all families can be found in Heywood et al. (2007) and Stevens (2001–), although these authors accept a slightly different family classification. A number of names with which people using this key may be familiar but are not employed in the system used in this work have been included for convenience and are enclosed on quotation marks. 1. Plants reproducing by spores and not producing flowers (“Ferns and lycopods”) 2. Aerial shoots either dichotomously branched, with scale leaves and 3-lobed sporophores or plants with fronds consisting of a simple or divided sterile blade and a simple or branched spikelike sporophore .................................................................................. -
Classification, Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Time, And
The JapaneseSocietyJapanese Society for Plant Systematics ISSN 1346-7565 Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 56 (2): 111-126 (2005) Invited article and Classification,MolecularPhylogeny,DivergenceTime, Morphological Evolution of Pteridophytes with Notes on Heterospory and and Monophyletic ParaphyleticGroups MASAHIRO KATO* Department ofBiotogicat Sciences,Graduate Schoot ofScience,Universitv. of7bkyo, Hongo, 7bk)]o IJ3- O033, lapan Pteridophytes are free-sporing vascular land plants that evolutionarily link bryophytes and seed plants. Conventiona], group (taxon)-based hierarchic classifications ofptcridophytes using phenetic characters are briefiy reviewcd. Review is also made for recent trcc-based cladistic analyses and molecular phy- logenetic analyses with increasingly large data sets ofmultiplc genes (compared to single genes in pre- vious studies) and increasingly large numbers of spccies representing major groups of pteridophytes (compared to particular groups in previous studies), and it is cxtended to most recent analyses of esti- mating divergcnce times ofpteridephytes, These c]assifications, phylogenetics, and divergcncc time esti- mates have improved our understanding of the diversity and historical structure of pteridophytes. Heterospory is noted with referencc to its origins, endospory, fertilization, and dispersal. Finally, menophylctic and paraphyletic groups rccently proposed or re-recognized are briefly dcscribcd. Key words: classification, divergence timc estimate. fems,heterospory, molecular phylogcny, pteri- dophytcs. Morphological -
Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift INNEHÅLL
Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 106(3–4): 129–208 ISSN 0039-646X, Uppsala 2012 Volym 106 • Häfte 3−4 • 2012 INNEHÅLL 106(3–4): 129–208 (2012) 129 Ordföranden har ordet: Mellan hägg och syren 130 Grundström, S, Nilsson, E & Vessberg, L: Mjällådalen – ett storslaget landskap med rik mångfald (Rich fauna and flora found in the Mjällådalen valley, east-central Sweden) 138 Karlsson, T: Nya namn för nordiska växter. 1. Lummerväxter– kirimojaväxter (Novelties in the flora of Norden. 1. Lycopodiaceae–Annonaceae) 156 Viklund, K: Linet i Sverige (Flax cultivation in Sweden) 165 Karlsson Strese, E-M, Tollin, C & Hagenblad, J: Den svenska humlens ursprung (Humulus lupulus in Sweden) 177 Widén, B: Hur går det för backsippan? (Status of Pulsatilla vulgaris ssp. vulgaris in Sweden) 189 Pettersson, M: Vinna eller försvinna – ett försök att rädda stor tofsäxing (Trying to save Koeleria grandis in Sweden) 4 19 Svenska Botaniska Föreningens atlasgrupp: En svensk kärlväxtatlas (A Swedish atlas of vascular plants) 201 Debatt: Ölands växtrikedom håller på att kvävas 205 Botanisk litteratur: Strindberg och växterna 207 Föreningsnytt: Lyckad konferens om hotad mångfald i skogen Framsidan: Sötgräs Cinna 208 Botaniskt nytt: Växt som fångar maskar under jorden latifolia har sitt starkaste svenska fäste i Mjällådalen. Tre andra spän- nande innevånare i dalen är älvsallat Mulgedium sibiri cum, aspfjäder- mossa Neckera pen nata och klotsporig murkla Gyromitra sphaerospora. Läs mer på sid. 130. Foto: Stefan Grund- ström & Stig Carlsson. 138 Dvärglåsbräken 156 Lin 165 Humle Exaktaprinting, Malmö 2012 Svenska Botaniska Föreningen Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift Föreningar anslutna till Svenska Botaniska Föreningen Kansli Svenska Botaniska Föreningen, Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift publicerar original- c/o Evolution och utvecklingsbiologi, Uppsala arbeten och översiktsartiklar om botanik på Adress samt en kontaktperson Föreningen Bohusläns flora Botaniska Föreningen i Evastina Blomgren, Dalgatan Västmanlands län univer sitet, Norbyvägen 18 A, 752 36 Uppsala. -
Psilotum Nudum Skeleton Fork-Fern
PLANT Psilotum nudum Skeleton Fork-fern AUS SA AMLR Endemism Life History Centre and are now held in captivity due to fears of rock destabilisation and habitat modification causing - E E - Perennial further decline (J. Quarmby pers. comm. 2009). A propagation program is being implemented and Family PSILOTACEAE plants will be reintroduced in the future (J. Quarmby pers. comm. 2009). There are no pre-1983 records.2 Habitat Occurs on seeping rock faces.4 At Mount Bold Reservoir plants occurred in crevice just above head height (near high water mark in winter), growing under an overhang of rock on vertical rock face.3 Type of rock substrate may be a limiting factor in distribution (T. Jury pers. comm.). Within the AMLR the preferred broad vegetation group is Riparian.2 Within the AMLR the species’ degree of habitat specialisation is classified as ‘Very High’.2 Biology and Ecology Primitive system of absorbing nutrients and water Photo: © Peter Lang through rhizomes is inefficient so the plant forms a relationship with a mycorrhizal fungus.5 Conservation Significance In SA, the distribution is confined within the AMLR, Aboriginal Significance disjunct from the remaining extant distribution in other Post-1983 records indicate the entire AMLR distribution States. Within the AMLR the species’ relative area of occurs in Peramangk Nation (bordering Kaurna occupancy is classified as ‘Extremely Restricted’. Nation). Relative to all AMLR extant species, the species' taxonomic uniqueness is classified as ‘Very High’.2 Threats Proposed increase in the storage capacity of Mount Description Bold Reservoir posed a significant threat (D. Duval pers. Low-growing fern devoid of any roots or true leaves. -
Horsetails and Ferns Are a Monophyletic Group and the Closest Living Relatives to Seed Plants
letters to nature joining trees and the amino-acid maximum parsimony phylogenies, and 100 replicates for ................................................................. the nucleotide maximum likelihood tree and the amino-acid distance-based analyses (Dayhoff PAM matrix) (see Supplementary Information for additional trees and summary Horsetails and ferns are a of bootstrap support). We performed tests of alternative phylogenetic hypotheses using Kishino±Hasegawa29 (parsimony and likelihood) and Templeton's non-parametric30 tests. monophyletic group and the Received 30 October; accepted 4 December 2000. closestlivingrelativestoseedplants 1. Eisenberg, J. F. The Mammalian Radiations (Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, 1981). 2. Novacek, M. J. Mammalian phylogeny: shaking the tree. Nature 356, 121±125 (1992). 3. O'Brien, S. J. et al. The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. Science 286, 458±481 (1999). Kathleen M. Pryer*, Harald Schneider*, Alan R. Smith², 4. Springer, M. S. et al. Endemic African mammals shake the phylogenetic tree. Nature 388, 61±64 (1997). Raymond Cran®ll², Paul G. Wolf³, Jeffrey S. Hunt* & Sedonia D. Sipes³ 5. Stanhope, M. J. et al. Highly congruent molecular support for a diverse clade of endemic African mammals. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 501±508 (1998). * Department of Botany, The Field Museum of Natural History, 6. McKenna, M. C. & Bell, S. K. Classi®cation of Mammals above the Species Level (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1997). 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA 7. Mouchatty, S. K., Gullberg, A., Janke, A. & Arnason, U. The phylogenetic position of the Talpidae ² University Herbarium, University of California, 1001 Valley Life Sciences within Eutheria based on analysis of complete mitochondrial sequences. Mol. -
Date - December, 2002
ASSOCIATION of DATE - DECEMBER, 2002 LEADER Peter Hind, 41 Miller Street, Mount Druitt. N. S. W. 2770 SECRETARY: TREASURER: Ron Wilkins, 188b Beecroft Rd., Cheltenham NSW 2 119 E-mail: [email protected] NEWSLETTER EDITOR: Mike Healy, 272 Hurnffray St. Nth., Ballarat. Vic. 3350 E-mail address: [email protected] SPORE BAM<: Barry Wnite, 24 Ruby Street, West Essendon. ~ic.3040 SUBSCRIPTIONSDUE FOR 2003. Please complete the attached form and return it together with your five dollars annual fee to the treasurer A.S.A.P. Ron Wilkins suggested that with members of the Fern Study Group widely distributed throughout Australia, many frequently see names quoted in newsletter items, books, etc. but don't really know who people like Peter Hind, Peter Bostock, Kerry Rathie, Calder Chaffey, Steve Celemesha, etc. are. This Newsletter we will commence a series of bio's. This month we will focus on the Fern study Group leader and a benefactor of the group. WHO IS PETER HIND ? Contributed by Ron Wilkins Well, as everyone knows, he is the leader of the Fern Study Group of the ASGAP. But how much more do you know about him? Peter is a Technical Officer with the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens / Herbarium. He was born in 1947 in Derbyshire, where as a boy he became interested in wild plants and hedgerows. He migrated with his parents to Australia in the early 60's and continued his education in Sydney at the Ryde Horticultural College. After graduation, he worked for 8-10 years in the NSW Botanic Gardens both outdoors, and in the glasshouses where he helped to maintain the orchid collection. -
Fern Classification
16 Fern classification ALAN R. SMITH, KATHLEEN M. PRYER, ERIC SCHUETTPELZ, PETRA KORALL, HARALD SCHNEIDER, AND PAUL G. WOLF 16.1 Introduction and historical summary / Over the past 70 years, many fern classifications, nearly all based on morphology, most explicitly or implicitly phylogenetic, have been proposed. The most complete and commonly used classifications, some intended primar• ily as herbarium (filing) schemes, are summarized in Table 16.1, and include: Christensen (1938), Copeland (1947), Holttum (1947, 1949), Nayar (1970), Bierhorst (1971), Crabbe et al. (1975), Pichi Sermolli (1977), Ching (1978), Tryon and Tryon (1982), Kramer (in Kubitzki, 1990), Hennipman (1996), and Stevenson and Loconte (1996). Other classifications or trees implying relationships, some with a regional focus, include Bower (1926), Ching (1940), Dickason (1946), Wagner (1969), Tagawa and Iwatsuki (1972), Holttum (1973), and Mickel (1974). Tryon (1952) and Pichi Sermolli (1973) reviewed and reproduced many of these and still earlier classifica• tions, and Pichi Sermolli (1970, 1981, 1982, 1986) also summarized information on family names of ferns. Smith (1996) provided a summary and discussion of recent classifications. With the advent of cladistic methods and molecular sequencing techniques, there has been an increased interest in classifications reflecting evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic studies robustly support a basal dichotomy within vascular plants, separating the lycophytes (less than 1 % of extant vascular plants) from the euphyllophytes (Figure 16.l; Raubeson and Jansen, 1992, Kenrick and Crane, 1997; Pryer et al., 2001a, 2004a, 2004b; Qiu et al., 2006). Living euphyl• lophytes, in turn, comprise two major clades: spermatophytes (seed plants), which are in excess of 260 000 species (Thorne, 2002; Scotland and Wortley, Biology and Evolution of Ferns and Lycopliytes, ed.