Field Bindweed in California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Field Bindweed in California ers, seeds, or seed capsules. The most Field bindweed in California destructive organisms are the seed bee- tles (Bruchidae), especially Sperrnopha- The outlook for biological control gus sericeus (Geoffroy). In Greece, smut caused by the fungus Thecophora se- minis-convolvuli (Desmaz.) Lioro infects Sara S. Rosenthal 0 Lloyd A. Andres 0 Carl B. Huffaker up to 17 percent of the seeds. Stem and root feeders. The remain- ing Mediterranean natural enemies at- tack the stems and roots. The agromyzid fly, Melanagromyza albocilia Hendel, is Biological control is seldom attempt- fornia, we have found a pattern that the most widespread stem borer. The ed against weeds on cultivated lands, may be used to help select the most pyralid moth, Noctuelia floralis because herbicides generally provide suitable European organisms for bio- (Huebner), attacks stems and roots ex- economical, efficient control, and farm- logical control. ternally. The most common root feeder ing practices may interfere with the Our discussion focuses on such spe- is the larva of the flea beetle, Longitar- biological agents. Field bindweed, how- cies and excludes many insects attract- sus pellucidus Foudras (or very near). ever, reproduces from seeds that may ed to the flowers for pollen or nectar as The adult feeds on the leaves. remain alive in the soil for more than 40 well as many crop pests for which field years and from an extensive perennial bindweed is an alternate host. For ex- California plant feeders root system. Control by cultivation or ample, we did not include the spider Foliage feeders. As might be expect- chemicals is difficult, at best. A search mites Tetranychus cinnabarinus Bois- ed, field bindweed has fewer natural for biological control agents therefore duval and T. urticae Koch, which are enemies in California that it has in its seemed warranted. Even if such agents very common and damage field bind- place of origin. The natural enemies of were effective only on field bindweed weed leaves in late summer. Various the native North American morning glo- growing along roadsides and in other sucking insects in the families Aphidi- ries, however, are more numerous and uncultivated areas, they would reduce dae, Cercopidae, and Pentatomidae feed tend to specialize in much the same way the weed’s potential for further invasion on field bindweed leaves, stems, and as species associated with bindweed of cultivated land. A cooperative U.S. seed capsules, respectively, but they and morning glories around the Medi- Department of Agriculture and Univer- also feed on nearby crop plants. Natural terranean. The previously mentioned sity of California project was begun in enemies that could damage commer- leaf miner and plume moth are distrib- 1970 to find biological agents for control cially valuable plants, primarily sweet uted worldwide and already occur in of field bindweed. potato, Ipomoea batatus (L.) Lam., or California on both field bindweed and Between then and 1979, Rosenthal ecologically valuable plants such as na- Calystegia spp. They have been consid- and a co-worker, Gary Buckingham, tive Calystegia spp. cannot be intro- ered as possible biological control collected arthropods and diseases that duced into the state. While hedge bind- agents for field bindweed and hedge attack field bindweed and its close rela- weed, Calystegia sepium (L.) R. Brown, bindweed in the eastern United States, tives in its native habitat, the Mediter- is a serious pest in the eastern United but both feed readily on sweet potato ranean area and Middle East. Trips were States, the native California morning and native morning glories. Therefore, made to Italy, Greece, the Iberian Penin- glories in this genus are not considered they cannot be used in California, and sula, Turkey, and Iran and to several troublesome. Two of them are rare their spread or augmentation anywhere other European countries. At each loca- plants that are under review for protec- in North America would seem unwise. tion, plants were inspected for damage, tion as endangered or threatened spe- A chrysomelid leaf miner, Brachycor- and arthropods were collected with an cies. yna delbrosa, can be numerous in the aspirator, hand-picked, or swept from leaves of woolly morning glory, Calyste- the plants with a net. Seeds and whole European plant feeders gia malacophyla (Greene) Munz, but it crowns were collected, from which or- Foliage feeders. About 80 percent of appears unable to live in the thinner ganisms were later reared or dissected. the natural enemies of field bindweed leaves of field bindweed. Lepidopterans The foreign work also included pre- in the Mediterranean are associated that feed on a variety of plants, such as liminary biological and host specificity with the foliage. Some of these, particu- the omnivorous leaf tier, Cnephasia lon- studies of the most promising biological larly Bedellia somnulentella Zeller (Lep- gana (Haworth), attack field bindweed control agents, using: bouquets of test idoptera: Lyonetiidae), are internal leaf in California, but no host-specific or plant material in %-pint (0.2-liter) card- miners. Externally feeding plume moth specialized Lepidoptera have been asso- board cartons; whole, small plants caterpillars (Pterophoridae), primarily ciated with the weed as they are in grown in peat pellets or small pots; Emmelina [Oidaematophorus) mono- Europe. Tortoise beetles (Cassidinae) outdoor plants in field cages; and ran- dactyla (L.) and leaf beetles (Chrysome- are commonly found on native morning domly planted test species in an experi- lidae), are most commonly seen on fo- glories but are seldom seen attacking mental garden in Greece. We conducted liage in the early half of the growing field bindweed. A gall mite, Eriophyes some final host specificity screening us- season; other lepidopterous defoliators sp., forms leaf galls on Calystegia ful- ing test plant bouquets in cardboard become more abundant later in the crata (Gray) Brummitt but is not found cartons in the US.Department of Agri- year. The most widespread moth of this on field bindweed. culture quarantine laboratory in Alba- latter group is Tyta luctuosa (Denis & Leaf spotting has occasionally been ny, California. Since 1980, Rosenthal Schiffermueller) (Noctuidae). Gall mites seen on field bindweed, but no fungus has also collected natural enemies of (Eriophyidae) distort and gall the leaves has yet been isolated from such spots. field bindweed and the closely related and buds. The most common foliar dis- Rust caused by the fungus Puccinia con- wild morning glories in the genus CaJys- ease is powdery mildew caused by the volvuli (Pers.) Cast. is seen on leaves of tegia in California. By comparing the fungus Erysiphe convolvuli DC. six Calystegia spp. but not on field bind- kinds of natural enemies associated Flower and seed feeders. Some 17 weed, even though it is considered to be with field bindweed and its close rela- percent of the Mediterranean natural a host of this fungus. tives in the Mediterranean and in Cali- enemies of bindweed feed on the flow- Continued on page 22 1 8 CALIFORNIAAGRICULTURE, SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 1983 Range improvement, cont’d the annuity. If the yield increase cannot The advantage of the equivalent an- be quantified, this will be a subjective nuity approach is the ease of adjusting evaluation. the benefits to evaluate potential values The possible sale of firewood, now a of conversion, production, and livestock profitable product for many ranchers, prices. Estimation of the net present will affect the method of improving value of these improvements and the wooded ranges. After the wood is har- subsequent sensitivity should give the vested, the area can be seeded for im- same answer. The annuity method is proved range capacity. The Hopland suggested only in those instances where Field Station has had a one-time yield of the yields and prices are not known and 12% cords per acre with a conservative estimates of the benefits are very uncer- stumpage price of $5 per cord. Although tain. In these cases subjective evalua- the money from selling firewood may tion will be assisted by the relatively finance the seeding costs, the firewood easy, equivalent annuity method. and seeding should be evaluated sepa- rately for profitability. Costs of seeding after firewood harvest convert to an Kent D. Olson is Economist, and Theodore E. equivalent annuity of $1.09 per acre Adorns, Jr.. is Wildlands Specialist, Cooperative (table 2), which should be compared Extension, University of California, Davis; and Alfred H. Murphy is Superintendent, Hopland with expected benefits and variations as Field Station, and Specialist, Agronomy and described. Range Science. Field Bindweed, cont’d Flower and seed feeders. The bru- Further tests conducted with the leaf chid beetle Megacerus impiger Horn fre- beetle in the quarantine facility at Alba- quently attacks seeds of all the Califor- ny, however, indicated that this beetle nia Calystegia spp. but only rarely is could feed and reproduce on several found in field bindweed seeds. The North American sweet potato varieties. smut found in Greece also occurs in The gall mite Aceria convolvuli Na- northern North America but is not lepa, from Greece, which attacks field found in California. bindweed buds and leaves, did not feed Stem and root feeders. No California on American sweet potato varieties in organisms are associated with field laboratory tests, but tests on American bindweed stems, but the cecidomyid morning glories are not complete. The fly, Lasioptera convolvuli Felt, forms powdery mildew appears to attack Con- stem galls on western morning glory, volvulus and Calystegia spp. Neither Calystegia occidentalis (Gray) Brum- natural enemy has been thoroughly mitt. The sweet potato flea beetle, studied yet, but both organisms, or at Chaetocnerna confinis Crotch, like its least some closely related organisms, European counterpart, Longitarsus offer promise of being specific. pellucidus, feeds on roots in its larval In conclusion, because some Ameri- stage and on leaves in its adult stage.
Recommended publications
  • Sweetpotato Leaf Miner (341)
    Pacific Pests and Pathogens - Fact Sheets https://apps.lucidcentral.org/ppp/ Sweetpotato leaf miner (341) Photo 1. Larval mines of the sweetpotato leafminer, Photo 1. Adult sweetpotato leafminer, Bedellia Bedellia somnulentella. somnulentella. Photo 3. Adult sweetpotato leafminer, Bedellia somnulentella, showing the fringed fore and hindwings. Common Name Sweetpotato leaf miner, morning glory leafminer Scientific Name Bedellia somnulentella; previously known as Bedellia ipomoeae. Distribution Worldwide. Asia, Africa, North America, Europe, Oceania. It is present in Australia, Fiji1, New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea. Hosts Sweet potato, kangkong (Ipomoea aquatica), and bindweeds (Calstegia and Convolvulus species). Symptoms & Life Cycle The damage is done by the larvae. Mines are at first serpentine (snake-like), and filled with frass; they become yellow-brown and later grow in width, forming blotches (Photo 1). At this stage, the larvae protrude from the blotch to defaecate. Later still, holes are produced in the leaves as the blotches are destroyed. The eggs are laid on the leaves, usually on the underside near the midrib, veins or base of the leaf blade. The larvae are yellowish with pink spots along the back, developing into red rounded projections on all segments. When mature, the larvae are 5.5 mm long. They exit the mines and make a network of silk threads on the underside of the leaf. When not feeding, they move around inside the threads, above the leaf surface. Frass often catches in the web of threads. The larvae pupate there. Adults are greyish brown, 3.5-4 mm long, with a tuft of light yellow to brown hairs on the head, and wingspan of 8-10 mm (Photos 2&3).
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell
    Phylogenetic Relationships within Heliodinidae and Systematics of Moths Formerly Assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell Phylogenetic Relationships within Heliodinidae and Systematics of Moths Formerly Assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley • Los Angeles • London UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN ENTOMOLGY Editorial Board: Penny Gullan, Bradford A. Hawkins, John Heraty, Lynn S. Kimsey, Serguei V. Triapitsyn, Philip S. Ward, Kipling Will Volume 124 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS, LTD. LONDON, ENGLAND © 2005 BY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hsu, Yu-Feng, 1963– Phylogenetic relationships within Heliodinidae and systematics of moths formerly assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) / Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-520-09847-1 (paper : alk. paper) — (University of California publications in entomology ; 124) 1. Heliodinidae—Classification. 2. Heliodinidae—Phylogeny. I. Title. II. Series. QL561.H44 H78 595.78 22—dc22 2004058800 Manufactured in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 1997) (Permanence of Paper). Contents Acknowledgments, ix Abstract, xi Introduction ...................................................... 1 Problems in Systematics of Heliodinidae and a Historical Review ............ 4 Material and Methods ............................................ 6 Specimens and Depositories, 6 Dissections and Measurements, 7 Wing Venation Preparation, 7 Scanning Electron Microscope Preparation, 8 Species Discrimination and Description, 8 Larval Rearing Procedures, 8 Phylogenetic Methods, 9 Phylogeny of Heliodinidae ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • ASHS Is Inviting/Encouraging Poster Presenters to Up- Posters: Load a PDF of Their Poster
    vt- •• ��t E�. Gallo Winery � BalL American Funding Generations of Floral Progress Through Research Image Analysis for Plant Science Endowment and Scholarships 1 of 262 General Information Conference Facilities: Speaker Ready Room: All Conference activities will take place at the Tropicana Oral, Workshop, Special Sessions, and Keynote speakers Las Vegas. are requested to check in at the Speaker Ready Room located in Churchill. Please note, even if you have Registration hours: uploaded in advance, you are still asked to check in at the Speaker Ready room at least 24 hours in advance of Sunday, July 21. .3:00 PM – 6:00 PM your presentation to confirm that your media and Pow- erPoint presentations were successfully uploaded and Monday, July 22 .............7:30 AM – 6:00 PM running properly. Updates and modifications can only Tuesday, July 23. 7:30 AM – 6:00 PM be made up to 24 hours in advance of your presentation. Wednesday, July 24. .7:30 AM – 5:00 PM Thursday, July 25 ............7:30 AM – 2:00 PM Poster Presenters and E-Posters: ASHS is inviting/encouraging poster presenters to up- Posters: load a PDF of their poster. You may also upload mp4 video or audio files to go along with the poster. Posters are located in Cohiba 5-12. As part of enhancing the ASHS online conference proceedings, you have the option to make your poster Poster Set Up: into an interactive electronic version (E-Poster). If you would like to explore this option, a link will appear once Monday, July 22 .............2:00 PM – 5:00 PM you have uploaded your PDF file with instructions on how to create your E-Poster.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2016 Report
    Fall 2016 Program Report The Fall 2016 School Malaise Trap Program was a huge success and your participation made it happen. This short report summarizes the program — its procedures and results — and all of the interesting discoveries from your work. Before we get to the results, let’s review what the School Malaise Trap Program was all about and how we worked together to complete it. The Biodiversity Institute of Ontario (BIO), at the University of Guelph, is a research institute dedicated to rapidly identifying and documenting life in Canada and in the world. This is no easy job since there are millions of different species of animals and plants across the globe, and about 100,000 of them occur in Canada. In addition, it’s often difficult to separate closely related species by their appearance, even for experts. Fortunately, BIO has developed a new tool that makes identifying species quick and easy — it’s called DNA barcoding. Just like a can of beans in a grocery store, where the barcode lets the cashier quickly know it is different from a can of peas, each species has a small piece of DNA that can be used to distinguish it from other species. BIO is assembling a DNA barcode reference library for all of the world’s species, called Barcode of Life Data Systems, and we’re doing it through a huge research project called the International Barcode of Life project. We need help to complete it, and that’s where your class and the School Malaise Trap Program fit in.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE ISSN NR 0253-939X VOLUME FORTY ONE· NUMBER TWO 41(2) 2020 LATEST IMPACT FACTOR: 1.833 MANUSCRIPTS ARE PUBLISHED ONLINE BY SUNJournals (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/sajev) Electronic copies of manuscripts are freely available at: http://www.sasev.org and on the internet via most search engines EDITOR Prof Leon M.T. Dicks E-mail: [email protected] ASSISTANT-EDITORS Dr Pia Addison (South Africa), Dr Elleunorah Allsopp (South Africa), Dr Rolene Bauer (South Africa), Prof Florian Bauer (South Africa), Dr Astrid Buica (South Africa), Prof Simone Castellarin (Canada), Dr Michael Costello (USA), Prof Benoit Divol (South Africa), Prof Maret du Toit (South Africa), Dr Ana M Fortes (Portugal), Dr Francois Halleen (South Africa), Dr Carolyn Howell (South Africa), Dr Lucilla Iacumin (Italy), Dr Neil Jolly (South Africa), Dr Sandra Lamprecht (South Africa), Dr Marianne McKay (South Africa), Dr John Moore (South Africa), Dr Lizel Mostert (South Africa), Dr Carlos Poblete-Echeverria (South Africa), Prof Doris Rauhut (Germany), Dr Evodia Setati (South Africa), Prof Giuseppe Spano (Italy), Janene Strydom (South Africa), Hanlé Theron (South Africa), Dr Philip Young (South Africa) Subscription for subscribers in South Africa = R850.00 (as from January 2021) Subscription for subscribers from outside South Africa = R2 100.00 (as from January 2021) Payment: Remittances to the correct amount must accompany all orders. Customers outside South Africa should preferably remit by bank drafts. Bank drafts must be calculated in, or for conversion into, South African Currency, free of all charges, and be made payable to SAWWV.
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire Entomology Issue 4.Pdf
    Shropshire Entomology – October 2011 (No.4) A bi-annual newsletter focussing upon the study of insects and other invertebrates in the county of Shropshire (V.C. 40) October 2011 (Vol. 4) Editor: Pete Boardman [email protected] ~ Welcome ~ Welcome to the 4th edition of the Shropshire Entomology newsletter. I think it is fair to say that we’ve had an exciting year of entomological discovery within Shropshire, with the Invertebrate Challenge training courses throwing up some fabulous finds, and it has been brilliant to be able to work with so many committed and interesting people. I’m also pleased to include details of the Shropshire Entomology Weekend (in conjunction with Preston Montford Field Centre , The Shropshire Invertebrates Group, The Invertebrate Challenge, and the BENHS) with booking details. This is a great opportunity to get together with fellow entomologists in the late winter when there is little going on outside in the way of insect activity. Many thanks once more to everyone who has contributed to this edition. The deadline for submission of content for Vol. 5 is Friday 16th March 2012. Please feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you feel might be interested in it. Note – past newsletters are now available for download as PDF’s from www.invertebrate-challenge.org.uk/newsletters- and-resources.aspx ~ Contents ~ The stag’s lesser cousin : Simon Yates The chocolate tipula isn’t edible: Pete Boardman Solitary wasps part 2 and social wasps: Ian Cheeseborough The cranefly Molophilus niger Goetghebuer,
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Leaf-Mining Insects and Control Options for Their Management, with Special Reference to Holocacista Capensis
    A Review of Leaf-mining Insects and Control Options for their Management, with Special Reference to Holocacista capensis (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae) in Vineyards in South Africa L.A.I. Steyn, H. Geertsema, A.P. Malan, P. Addison* Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa Date of submission for publication: May 2020 Date of acceptance for publication: August 2020 Key words: Integrated pest management, leaf miner, biological control, grapevine A leaf-mining pest occurring on commercial varieties of Vitis vinifera in South Africa was investigated due to the presence of cocoons on fruit. The leaf miner, Holocacista capensis, was reported on grapevines in 2012. Since its discovery on commercial grape varieties, control strategies have consisted solely of insecticide applications. Despite the fact that the leaf-mining habit is taxonomically diverse and considered ancient, little is generally known of leaf-mining larvae. A review was conducted in order to better understand the leaf-mining strategy and amalgamate the current knowledge of other leaf-mining insects. The general evolutionary history within the full complement of taxa that display the leaf-mining habit is discussed. The review focuses on lepidopteran leaf-mining pests and discloses the known information associated with the first report and the impact of H. capensis in the Western Cape, South Africa. As no control methods have been identified forH. capensis in vineyards, various chemical, biological and cultural control strategies adopted for other leaf-mining pests were investigated. Control options, including the use of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), parasitoids, physical and cultural control measures, were considered and are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea: Heliodinidae) from the Andes of Northern Chile
    European Journal of Taxonomy 731: 117–134 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.731.1209 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2021 · Vargas H.A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:070B1EBB-976A-4EBB-B37D-6CB4A10D09FF Systematics of Helioandesia tarregai gen. et sp. nov. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea: Heliodinidae) from the Andes of Northern Chile Héctor A. VARGAS Departamento de Recursos Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5355-3157 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F33A83F8-60FF-42F3-AA23-D6A7B64CD183 Abstract. The adult stage of Helioandesia tarregai gen. et sp. nov. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea: Heliodinidae) is described and illustrated from the arid western slopes of the Andes of northern Chile. The larvae of H. tarregai gen. et sp. nov. feed as leaf skeletonizers on Mirabilis acuta (Reiche) Heimerl (Nyctaginaceae). The mostly gray forewing of H. tarregai gen. et sp. nov., ornamented with strongly bulging metallic spots, resembles that of the representatives of the mainly Nearctic Lithariapteryx Chambers, 1876. However, the latter lacks CuP in the forewing, has a single bristle in the female frenulum, and lacks a well-developed cornutus. Helioandesia gen. nov. clustered as sister to Neoheliodines Hsu, 2004 in a cladistic analysis, although no synapomorphies were found for this cluster, while Lithariapteryx was sister to Helioandesia gen. nov. + Neoheliodines based on two synapomorphies. The genetic distance between a DNA barcode sequence of H. tarregai gen. et sp. nov. and representatives of other genera of Heliodinidae Heinemann, 1877 was 9.0–12.5% (K2P), and a maximum likelihood analysis based on this molecular marker confi rmed the placement of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of Canada 463 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.27259 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 463–505 (2019) Lepidoptera of Canada 463 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.27259 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Lepidoptera of Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Jean-François Landry2, B. Chris Schmidt2, Jeremy R. deWaard3 1 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 5320 – 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 3S5, Canada 2 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada 3 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada Corresponding author: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 6 June 2018 | Accepted 20 August 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/D18E9BBE-EB97-4528-B312-70C3AA9C3FD8 Citation: Pohl GR, Landry J-F, Schmidt BC, deWaard JR (2019) Lepidoptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 463–505. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.27259 Abstract The known Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) of the provinces and territories of Canada are summarised, and current knowledge is compared to the state of knowledge in 1979. A total of 5405 species are known to occur in Canada in 81 families, and a further 50 species have been reported but are unconfirmed. This represents an increase of 1348 species since 1979. The DNA barcodes available for Canadian Lepidoptera are also tabulated, based on a dataset of 148,314 specimens corresponding to 5842 distinct clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • And Bedellia Somnulentella (Zeller), Have Potential As Control Agents of Bindweed in Areas Where Sweet Potato Is Not Grown Commercially
    ~ OIDAEMATOPHORUS MONODACTYLUS (L.) AND BEDELLIA SOMNULENTELLA (ZELLER): TWO POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS OF HEDGE BINDWEED;IN SOUTHWESTERN VIRGINIA By Michael Peter,Parrellal/ J Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in ENTOMOLOGY Approved: Dr. L. T. Kok, Chairman Dr. R. L. Pienkowski Dr. D. G. Cochran Dr. J. McD. Grayson May, 1977 Blacksburg, Virginia To My Parents- whos e encouragement and support made this possible ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to whose understanding, patience and guidance aided immeasurably in the development of this thesis and myself as a researcher. I would also like to thank for helpful critical reviews of the manuscripts and thesis proper. My appreciation is extended to and for supplying the sweet potato varieties, and to for insect identification. I wish to express my gratitude to my colleague and friend, for his advice and assistance along the way. and his wife, , made Virginia a much better place to live. I am indebted to who helped statistically, verbally, and physically in many of my research endeavors. Finally, I would like to express my appreciation to for some typing and proof reading, and for providing incentive during the last few months. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements iii List of Figures vii List of Tables ix I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review 3 The Genus Convolvulus 3 A. Convolvulus arvensis - Field Bindweed 4 B. Convolvulus sepium - Hedge Bindweed 5 Biology of Bindweed 8 Control of Bindweed 12 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 BIODIVERSITY REPORT City of Los Angeles
    2018 BIODIVERSITY REPORT City of Los Angeles Appendix B: Singapore Index Methods for Los Angeles Prepared by: Isaac Brown Ecology Studio and LA Sanitation & Environment Appendix B Singapore Index Detailed Methods Appendix B Table of Contents Appendix B Table of Contents ...................................................................................................... i Appendix B1: Singapore Index Indicator 1 ................................................................................. 1 Appendix B2: Singapore Index Indicator 2 ................................................................................. 6 Appendix B3: Singapore Index Indicator 3 ................................................................................10 Appendix B4: Singapore Index Indicator 4 ................................................................................16 Appendix B5: Singapore Index Indicator 5 ................................................................................39 Appendix B6: Singapore Index Indicator 6 ................................................................................44 Appendix B7: Singapore Index Indicator 7 ................................................................................52 Appendix B8: Singapore Index Indicator 8 ................................................................................55 Appendix B9: Singapore Index Indicator 9 ................................................................................58 Appendix B10: Singapore Index Indicator 10 ............................................................................61
    [Show full text]