DOCSLIB.ORG

M5 Motorway Phase III Hungary: Update [EBRD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SCOTT WILSON BUSINESS CONSULTANCY M5 Motorway Phase III Hungary: Environmental Impact Assessment Update Volume I - REPORT Scott Wilson Business Consultancy We work with clients to develop, implement and evaluate projects, programmes and change initiatives to improve performance and reduce risk. M5 Motorway Phase III Hungary: Environmental Update Report February 2005 Collated and Rachael Bailey edited by: Environmental Specialist Reviewed by: Tracey Ryan Project Manager Approved by: Alan Brookes Director Scott Wilson Business Consultancy Greencoat House 15 Francis Street London SW1P 1DH Tel: +44 (0)20 7798 5200 Fax: +44 (0)20 7798 5201 Email: [email protected] M5 MOTORWAY HUNGARY: Phase III Environmental Impact Assessment Update Report TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS _______________________________ 5 List of Abbreviations _________________________________ 7 1 Introduction __________________________________ 8 1.1 Background and Objectives of the Assignment ___________8 1.1.1 Principal changes required to update the Uvaterv EIA (1999)_______ 8 1.1.2 Relevant previous assignments _______________________________ 9 1.2 Operational Framework _______________________________9 1.3 The Site and Project History ___________________________9 1.4 Analysis of Alternatives ______________________________10 1.5 Recommendations from Gap Analysis Report____________10 1.6 Structure of the Report_______________________________11 2 Project Description ___________________________ 12 2.1 Overview __________________________________________12 2.2 Key Design Features_________________________________12 3 Environmental Legislation and Permitting________ 14 3.1 Legal and Institutional Framework _____________________14 3.2 Environmental Legislation ____________________________14 3.3 Environmental Permitting and Licensing ________________14 3.3.1 Construction Permit _______________________________________ 15 3.3.2 Water Permits_____________________________________________ 15 3.3.3 Borrow Pit Licences _______________________________________ 15 3.3.4 Emergency Response ______________________________________ 15 4 Phase III Environmental Issues _________________ 16 4.1 Assessment Methodology ____________________________16 4.2 Traffic _____________________________________________17 4.3 Land Use and Soil ___________________________________18 4.3.1 Baseline Information _______________________________________ 18 4.3.2 Impacts Assessment _______________________________________ 18 4.3.3 Mitigation ________________________________________________ 19 4.3.4 Monitoring _______________________________________________ 19 4.4 Water Quality _______________________________________20 4.4.1 Background ______________________________________________ 20 4.4.2 Baseline _________________________________________________ 20 Scott Wilson Business Consultancy 1 M5 MOTORWAY HUNGARY: Phase III Environmental Impact Assessment Update Report 4.4.3 Impact Assessment ________________________________________ 20 4.4.4 Mitigation ________________________________________________ 22 4.4.5 Monitoring _______________________________________________ 22 4.5 Air Quality _________________________________________23 4.5.1 Background ______________________________________________ 23 4.5.2 Baseline Information _______________________________________ 23 4.5.3 Impact Assessment ________________________________________ 23 4.5.4 Mitigation ________________________________________________ 24 4.5.5 Monitoring _______________________________________________ 24 4.5.6 Summary_________________________________________________ 25 4.6 Noise and Vibration__________________________________26 4.6.1 Background ______________________________________________ 26 4.6.2 Baseline Information _______________________________________ 26 4.6.3 Impact Assessment ________________________________________ 27 4.6.4 Mitigation ________________________________________________ 28 4.6.5 Summary_________________________________________________ 28 4.7 Landscape _________________________________________29 4.7.1 Baseline Information _______________________________________ 29 4.7.2 Impact Assessment ________________________________________ 29 4.7.3 Mitigation ________________________________________________ 30 4.7.4 Monitoring _______________________________________________ 31 4.7.5 Summary_________________________________________________ 31 4.8 Natural Environment and Ecology______________________32 4.8.1 Background ______________________________________________ 32 4.8.2 Baseline Information _______________________________________ 32 4.8.3 Impact Assessment ________________________________________ 33 Construction Impacts _____________________________________________ 33 4.8.4 Mitigation ________________________________________________ 34 4.8.5 Monitoring _______________________________________________ 36 4.9 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage _____________________37 4.9.1 Background ______________________________________________ 37 4.9.2 Baseline Information _______________________________________ 37 4.9.3 Impact Assessment ________________________________________ 37 4.9.4 Mitigation ________________________________________________ 38 4.9.5 Monitoring _______________________________________________ 38 4.10 Social and Community _____________________________39 4.10.1 Community and Stakeholder ________________________________ 39 4.10.2 Involuntary Resettlement ___________________________________ 39 4.10.3 Compensation Procedures __________________________________ 43 4.10.4 Vulnerable Groups_________________________________________ 44 4.10.5 Forced and Child (Under 18) Labour __________________________ 44 Scott Wilson Business Consultancy 2 M5 MOTORWAY HUNGARY: Phase III Environmental Impact Assessment Update Report 4.10.6 Road safety_______________________________________________ 45 4.10.7 Social Impacts of Noise and Air Pollution______________________ 45 4.10.8 Social Monitoring__________________________________________ 45 4.11 Borrow Pits _______________________________________46 5 Public Information and Consultation ____________ 47 5.1 Original Consultation for the M5 Motorway ______________47 5.1.1 Consultation during Phase II: Modified Design for Approval ______ 48 5.1.2 Previous Consultation for Phase II EIA Update and Environmental Review Meeting __________________________________________________ 48 5.1.3 Consultation for Phase III EIA Update and Environmental Review Meeting __________________________________________________ 49 5.1.4 Consultation following the Public Meeting – Household Survey ___ 50 5.1.5 Dissemination of Information to the Public_____________________ 51 5.1.6 Recommended consultation during Construction _______________ 51 5.1.7 Household Survey Responses Summary ______________________ 52 6 Proposed Mitigation Measures _________________ 54 7 Recommendations for Monitoring Plan __________ 58 7.1 Water Quality _______________________________________58 7.2 Air Quality _________________________________________58 7.3 Noise and Vibration__________________________________58 7.4 Landscape _________________________________________59 7.5 Natural Environment and Ecology______________________59 7.6 Socio-Economic ____________________________________59 7.7 Monitoring by the Banks _____________________________60 8 Management Plan ____________________________ 61 9 Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) _________________________________________ 68 9.1 Water Quality _______________________________________68 9.2 Landscape _________________________________________69 9.3 Noise and Vibration__________________________________69 9.4 Natural Environment and Ecology______________________70 9.5 Archaeology _______________________________________70 9.6 Social _____________________________________________70 10 Non Technical Summary ______________________ 72 10.1 Screening Category and Rationale for Classification_____72 10.2 Introduction ______________________________________72 10.3 Method __________________________________________72 Scott Wilson Business Consultancy 3 M5 MOTORWAY HUNGARY: Phase III Environmental Impact Assessment Update Report 10.4 Description of the Scheme __________________________72 10.5 Key issues _______________________________________73 10.5.1 Land Use and Soil _________________________________________ 73 10.5.2 Water quality _____________________________________________ 74 10.5.3 Air quality ________________________________________________ 74 10.5.4 Noise and Vibration ________________________________________ 74 10.5.5 Landscape _______________________________________________ 75 10.5.6 Natural Environment and Ecology ____________________________ 75 10.5.7 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage ___________________________ 75 10.5.8 Social and Community _____________________________________ 76 10.5.9 Borrow Pits_______________________________________________ 76 10.5.10 Monitoring______________________________________________ 76 10.5.11 Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) ________ 76 Scott Wilson Business Consultancy 4 M5 MOTORWAY HUNGARY: Phase III Environmental Impact Assessment Update Report GLOSSARY OF TERMS AKA Project sponsors (concessionaire) also responsible for the commissioning of the environmental permit and construction permit reviews. A Weighted Decibel Internationally accepted unit for the most frequently used noise measurement. Borrow Pit Area used to obtain materials i.e. sand for construction. CEMP A manual which defines the approach to environmental management during construction.
Recommended publications
  • Economic and Social Council

    Economic and Social Council

    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL TRANS/WP.5/2005/16/Add.8 24 October 2005 ENGLISH ONLY ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (Eighteenth session, 15-16 September 2005, agenda item 3(b)) MONITORING OF DEVELOPMENTS RELEVANT FOR THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND AREAS Infrastructure bottlenecks and missing links Transmitted by the Government of Hungary According to the report on “Infrastructure Bottlenecks and Missing Links in the European Transport Network” bottlenecks can be caused by: (1) insufficient infrastructure capacity; (2) low quality of transport infrastructure. In the same manner, the phenomenon of a “missing link” may be considered as a situation in which the quality of service has extremely low values due to the fact that no direct link exists between two points. As described in the above-mentioned document, as a simplified method, for individual road categories, one may take the following capacities in terms of number of vehicles as the average daily traffic: − 4-lane motorway: 40,000 – 60,000 PCU/24 hrs − roads of 2 lanes: 8,000 – 12,000 PCU/24 hrs As in the case of roads, there are a great number of factors determining the bottlenecks on a railway line. It is practically impossible to concentrate all elements in a single bottleneck measure. In order to reach practical measures it appeared appropriate to take the following capacity limits: TRANS/WP.5/2005/16/Add.8 page 2 − Single track main lines: 1 x 60 – 80 trains/day − Double track main lines: 2 x 100 – 200 trains/day According to that definition, the bottlenecks regarding the Hungarian TEN road network are described below.
  • Budapest and Central Danube Region

    Budapest and Central Danube Region

    Touristic areas of the Budapest and Central Danube Region www.hungary.com Talent for entertaining Forest Tourinform Office Etyek-Buda wine region Residence Kunság wine region Castle National Park Castle ruin Region’s border Museum Highway Thermal/wellness bath Railway Airport Ferry World Heritage Budapest – Central Danube Region “Why Budapest and its surrounding area?” This is the obvious question holiday makers will ask when planning their travels, and we hope to provide the answer. Budapest, Heroes’ Square Budapest because: • it is the cultural, political and transportation centre of Hungary; • it is built on both side of the Danube, the great European river that is registered as a World Heritage panorama; • nature is safeguarded in two national parks and a number of environmental protection areas; • it has represented a “multicultural Europe” for centuries – over 200 nearby villages are populated by Hungarians, Serbs, Slovaks and Germans (Swabians); • it has a strong artistic and cultural heritage; • there’s always something happening: festivals, concerts, theatre perform- ances, sports competitions, exhibitions, church events, wine celebrations or handicraft fairs; • there are many outdoor activities to enjoy: trekking, rock climbing, biking, horse riding, golf, rowing, swimming, potholing or fl ying; • its restaurants offer not only Hungarian cuisine – and wine and palinka – but food from all over the world. Don’t hesitate – come to Budapest, the centre of things! Széchenyi Thermal Baths (We have marked our suggested “must-see” destinations with ***. However, these are naturally subjective selections, and we hope that our guests will fi nd their own three-star experiences.) MT ZRT www.itthon.hu Visegrád Castle Games 1 Budapest – Central Danube Region Budapest Buda Castle and Chain Bridge When you arrive in Budapest, head to the centre and drink in the view of the city’s two parts, divided by the Danube and linked by the bridges that cross it.
  • BTC EGTC, Region's Bridge of Innovation

    BTC EGTC, Region's Bridge of Innovation

    BTC EGTC, 20 region’s bridge 18 of innovation Preface City mayors from three countries collaboration. This is particularly have created the idea of the important for us, since we want to Grouping in 2009. keep economical, commercial, social The Grouping was established in contacts in the region covered by order to achieve their main goal BTC EGTC group. - the reducing of development The Grouping’s primary goal is a diff erences in the area surrounding harmonical regional development, the Hungarian-Romanian-Serbian improvement of the economical, border. social and territorial cohesion, as The establishment of BTC EGTC well as enabling a successful cross- provides such opportunities, which border collaboration. help to remove the borders in the region, and build bridges between BTC EGTC the local authorities, in their organization 2 BTC EGTC Introduction On 17th June 2009, almost fi fty mayors from the triple-border region municipalities decided to establish a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) named „Banat - Triplex Confi nium” in a summit in Mórahalom. The headquarters of the Group is also in Mórahalom. The initial membership of BTC EGTC contained 37 Hungarian municipalities, 37 Romanian municipalities, as well as 8 Serbian towns as observing members. Another three Hungarian municipalities joined the Group in 2012 - Csengele, Kistelek and Zá- kányszék. Banat-Triplex Confi nium EGTC members are the following: BTC EGTC, region’s bridge of innovation 2018 Hungary • Ambrózfalva • Ferencszállás • Kunbaja • Öttömös • Apátfalva
  • European Commission

    European Commission

    C 171/12 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 19.5.2020 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2020/C 171/07) This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1). COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT ‘Duna/Dunai’ Reference number PDO-HU-A1345-AM02 Date of communication: 9.2.2020 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Addition of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora, Újszilvás and Bácsszentgyörgy to the demarcated area (a) Product specification headings affected: IV. Demarcated area (b) Single document heading affected: Demarcated geographical area (c) Reasons: — The Wine Community Council of the Kunság Region (Kunsági Borvidék Hegyközségi Tanácsa) amended the product specification for the ‘Kunság/Kunsági’ PDO. The areas of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora and Újszilvás classified as Class I and II according to the vineyard cadastre of wine-producing regions were added to the demarcated area. The change affects the demarcated area in the product specification for the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO and has been included in this application. The characteristics of the areas included in the vineyard cadastre correspond to the demarcated area of the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO. Vine-growing is one of the traditional economic activities of local inhabitants. The classification of the wine region and the possibility to produce the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO generates significant employment and income in these municipalities and contributes greatly towards the local tourism industry.
  • Section 3 in Csongrad County of M5 Motorway [EBRD

    Section 3 in Csongrad County of M5 Motorway [EBRD

    Project No. 50630/503/501 SECTION MARKED III (BETWEEN CHAINAGE 161.0 AND 174.5 KM) IN CSONGRÁD COUNTY OF M5 MOTORWAY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN DETAIL UVATERV RT. BUDAPEST, February 1999 02 03. 99 Mrs Sign. Mrs Sign. MÁTAI Sign. CORRECTED AS AGREED WITH BÖRZSÖNYI HERNÁDYNÉ József THE CLIENT Péterné LÁNG J. 01 12. 98 Mrs Sign. Mrs Sign. MÁTAI FIRST ISSUE BÖRZSÖNYI HERNÁDYNÉ József Péterné LÁNG J. Name Sign. Name Sign. Name Sign. REV. DATE REASON OF REVISION DESIGNER CHECKED APPROVED PROJECT MANAGER DIVISION DIRECTOR Sign. DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL Sign. KOVÁCSHÁZY Frigyes KOVÁCSHÁZY Frigyes Dr KARSAY L. Client: ROAD MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION DIRECTORATE OFFICE OF MOTORWAY DEVELOPMENT H-1024 Budapest, Fényes Elek u. 7-13 Engineer: UVATERV ÚT-, VASÚTTERVEZŐ RT. [UVATERV ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD.] H-1117 Budapest, Dombóvári út 17-19 Project: M5 Motorway Csongrád County section (126.4 – 174.5 km) Designed phase: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN DETAIL Section III 161.0 – 174.5 km Designed CSONGRÁD COUNTY branch: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Project No.: 50630/503/501 Detail: Special mark: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN DETAIL Drawing No.: 2 Scale: 2 Drawing Area: m Prepared by: UVATERV Rt.: MÁTAI József chief coordinator Mrs BÖRZSÖNYI Péterné compilation, reconciliation Mrs KÓKAINÉ GILYÉN Mária landscape protection KÜZMÖS György traffic assessment ORBÁN Ferenc traffic assessment ÖKO Rt.: Dr TOMBÁCZ Endre compilation MAGYAR Emőke compilation introduction, preliminaries, influencing factors, estimation of impact area, summary NAGY István communal environment Mrs PÁL Tiborné communal environment Vibrocomp Kft. Dr BITE Pálné noise and vibration protection Mrs MÉSZÁROSNÉ KIS Ágnes protection of air purity KRONA Kft.: PAP Zoltán measurements of air quality ORNIS Kft.
  • Hungary General Report 2015

    Hungary General Report 2015

    HUNGARY GENERAL REPORT 2015 ASECAP STUDY AND INFORMATION DAYS MADRID, 23 - 25 MAY 2016 Network length Length of the motorway network in Hungary as of 31 December 2015: 1.180 km. The length of the motorway, expressway and trunk road sections operated by the Hungarian Public Road Nonprofit Pte Ltd Co. (MK NZrt.) as of 31 December 2015 are: 1071 km. The Hungarian Public Road Company is responsible for the operation and maintenance of M1, M3, M30, M31, M35, M43, M7, M8 Motorways; M5 Motorway between km sections 13 - 17.4, M6 Motorway between km sections 14 - 22,3 and several expressways (M0, M2,…). 2 AKA Zrt. (AKA Alföld Concession Motorway Co. Ltd.) is a Concession Company responsible for the operation and maintenance of M5 Motorway between km section 17+400 and 173+895, total length of 156,5 km. Overall length of the bridges on the M5 motorway are 3,7 km. No more sections are foreseen at the moment to be included in this Concession. M6 Duna Autópálya Koncessziós Zrt. (M6 Danube Concession Motorway Co. Ltd.) is a Concession Company responsible for the operation and maintenance of M6 between km sections 22+150 and 76+200 and M8 between km sections 5+750 and 10+300 which sections were opened to traffic on 11 June 2006. The bridges on the above motorways are 2,81 km long (including all types of bridges). No more sections are foreseen at the moment to be included in this Concession. M6 Tolna Autópálya Koncessziós Zrt. (M6 Tolna Motorway Concession Ltd.) is a Concession Company responsible for the design, construction, finance, operation and maintenance of M6 motorway between km sections 76+200 and 141+300.
  • Kistelek-Sándorfalvi Körzet Erdőterve 2007-2016 ______

    Kistelek-Sándorfalvi Körzet Erdőterve 2007-2016 ______

    Kistelek-Sándorfalvi körzet erdőterve 2007-2016 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Az I. kötet tartalomjegyzéke Bevezető. A körzeti erdőtervezés 2 1. Hatósági eljárások 4 1.1. Előzetes jegyzőkönyv 5 1.2. Zárójegyzőkönyv 26 1.3. Határozatok 40 A körzetben érvényét vesztett erdőállomány-gazdálkodási tervek 42 2. Táblázatok, statisztikák a körzet teljes területére 67 2.1. Területi adatok 68 2.1.2. Helységhatáros területkimutatás 68 2.1.3. Rendeltetések kimutatása – elsődleges és további rendeltetések együtt (Halmozott terület hektárban) 68 2.1.4.A. Elsődleges rendeltetések területkimutatása 68 2.1.4.B. További rendeltetések területkimutatása I. 68 2.1.4.C. További rendeltetések területkimutatása II. 68 2.1.5. Egyéb részletek területkimutatása 68 2.1.6. Területváltozás a körzetben 75 2.2. Termőhelyi adatok 76 2.2.1. Termőhelytípus-változatok megoszlása 76 2.2.2. Faállománytípusok klímák szerint 76 2.3. Állapot adatok 80 2.3.1. Korosztály táblázatok 80 2.3.2.A. Vágásos erdők - korosztály táblázat fafajonként 80 2.3.2.D. Faanyagtermelést nem szolgáló erdők - korosztály táblázat fafajonként 80 2.3.3. Faállománytípusok megoszlása fatermőképességi csoportok szerint 80 2.3.4. Vágásérettségi korokhoz tartozó terület fafajok szerint 80 2.3.5. Vágásérettségi csoportok területe fafajok szerint 100 évre 80 2.3.6. Vágásérettségi csoportok terület és fakészlet adatai fafajok szerint 30 évre 80 2.3.7. Záródás minősítése faállománytípusonként 80 2.3.8. Erdőterület megoszlása károsítók szerint 80 2.3.10. Állapotadatok változásának áttekintő táblázata 105 2.3.11. Fafajok terület- és fakészlet-adatainak változása 106 2.3.12. Fafajok átlagos vágásérettségi korának változása 107 2.4. Tervadatok 108 Hosszú távú tervadatok a körzet teljes területére 108 2.4.1.A.
  • First Results in Modelling Objective Well-Being in Hungary at Lower Territorial Level*2

    First Results in Modelling Objective Well-Being in Hungary at Lower Territorial Level*2

    REGIONAL STATISTICS, 2014, VOL 4, No 2: 71–86; DOI: 10.15196/RS04205 NAGY GÁBORa) – KOÓS BÁLINTb)1 First results in modelling objective well-being 2 in Hungary at lower territorial level* Abstract Developing complex indicators measuring economic output, added value and indicators relying on an entirely different basis, researchers worked on the assumption that economic output does not correlate strongly with people’s happiness or quality of life. Most measurements relate to countries and federal states. Only a few seek to present or model differences at lower territorial levels. This study discloses the first results of pilot calculations that have been performed as part of Hungary’s Social Renewal Programme. These explore differences at the level of Hungarian districts (LAU1) with the proviso, that the spatial structure presented only reflects what is called objective well-being. A more comprehensive picture can be obtained only if the subjective well-being dimensions incorporating and weighted by the results of a large-scale sample survey, conducted in the meantime, are also taken into account. Keywords: well-being, spatial structure, model-calculation, weighting process, districts. Preface Developing complex indicators measuring economic output and added value (HDI, UNDP Millennium Development Goals), and indicators relying on an entirely different basis (the National Happiness Index and well-being indexes with various content) (see e.g. Constanza 2009, Diener–Biswas-Diener 2002, Booysen 2002, Beyond GDP 2009, Stieglitz 2009, Atlas… – The World Bank 2013, CIW 2012, Kovacevic 2010, Marks et al. 2006), researchers worked on the assumption that economic output does not correlate strongly with people’s happiness or quality of life.
  • El?Adas Cime

    El?Adas Cime

    PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION IN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN HUNGARY 1990- Miklós Murányi Sarolta Beregi Toth October, 2009. Seoul PPP PILOTE PROJECTS INTERMINISTERIAL COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE AND DECIDE: • Tourism (conference center) • Justice (prison) • Health care (Hospital) • Local Government (Sport stadium) PPP PILOTE PROJECTS • Education (student dormitory) • Infrastructure (fast train link from city of Budapest to Ferihegy International Airport) • Residental developments (appartements for long term rent) • Motorways FAR THE LARGEST SEGMENT • Expressway development program of the government in PPP MAIN TRANSPORTATION ARTERIES IN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD OF HUNGARY Tornyosnémeti MainMain transporttransport corridorscorridors inin Záhony V. UA Lónya HUNGARYHUNGARY Barabás Beregsurány Parassapuszta Miskolc IV. VII. Rajka SK Salgótarján Emőd Tiszabecs Hegyeshalom Nyíregyháza Medve A Komárom Eger Gyöngyös Csengersima Polgár Győr Füzesabony Debrecen Sopron Tatabánya BUDAPEST Szombathely Székesfehérvár Szolnok Veszprém Rábafüzes RO Biharkeresztes Zalaegerszeg Balatonaliga Kecskemét Zamárdi Békéscsaba Kiskunfélegyháza additional Tornyisz.miklós TINA Szekszárd SLO Letenye Szekszárd Szeged Kaposvár Sükösd elements V. Nagylak Baja Mohács Röszke Pécs HR proposed YU IV. Illocska TINA X/A. V/C. VII. elements MOTORWAY NETWORK OF HUNGARY IN 1993 UA Tisza Miskolc SK Salgótarján Nyíregyháza A M3 Duna Gyöngyös Győr Füzesabony Sopron M1 Tatabánya BUDAPEST Debrecen Szombathely Székesfehérvár Szolnok Veszprém M0 Baliga M5 RO Dunaújváros Zalaegerszeg M7 Kecskemét
  • Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál Gyál, M5, M0

    Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál Gyál, M5, M0

    Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál Gyál, M5, M0 175.000 négyzetméter www.prologisgyal.com Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál Gyál A parkról About the park Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál egy modern disztribúciós Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál is a state-of-the-art központ, melynek 175.000 négyzetméteres területén distribution center that currently consists of six jelenleg 6 épület található. A park magas minőségű, ügyfél buildings totaling 175,000 square meters of igényekhez igazított raktáregységeket kínál. Az épületek warehouse and office space. The Park offers teljesítik az összes modern raktározási elvárást és ideális warehouse units of the highest quality, flexible units feltételeket biztosítanak a hazai és nemzetközi gyártó és fitted to customers' requirements. The buildings fulfill logisztikai szereplők számára. all modern warehousing expectations and offers ideal conditions for domestic and international manufacturing and distribution. Elhelyezkedés Location A Prologis Park Budapest - Gyál Budapest központjától Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál is located approximately 18 kilométerre délkeletre, a Liszt Ferenc nemzetközi 18 kilometers southeast of the Budapest City Centre repülőtértől 17 kilométerre, a Románia és Szerbia felé and 17 kilometers west of Budapest International 175.000 vezető M5-ös autópálya és az M0-ás körgyűrű Airport. The park is adjacent to the M5 motorway (that kereszteződésénél található. leads south towards Serbia and Romania) and the M5- négyzetméter ipari terület M0 junction. square meters of industrial space 18 Előnyök kilométerre
  • Appendix 9 Concession Experience in the Road

    Appendix 9 Concession Experience in the Road

    Louis Berger S.A. APPENDIX 9 CONCESSION EXPERIENCE IN THE ROAD TRANSPORTATION SECTOR IN CENTRAL EUROPE 1. BACKGROUND Introduction During recent years, the goal in several countries in Central Europe has been to aim to bring an increasing participation of the private sector into the development of transport infrastructure. This has occurred in differing ways, with differing results through the whole spectrum from fully privatised, and public/private partnerships to wholly publicly financed projects. This paper summarises some of the key projects which have been realised, or are under realisation, principally in the countries of Hungary, Poland and Croatia in the Road Transport Sector. The focus therefore is on selected concessions for toll motorways in these countries. Hungary Under the previous government, there was a strong policy towards promoting the development of motorways in the Republic of Hungary on a privately financed basis. With enactment of the Concessions Act, the Ministry of Transport actively promoted the development of several Concessions. Poland In the Republic of Poland, the promotion of new motorways was stimulated by the enactment of the Motorway Act in 1994. However it has taken several years to reach realisation of the first toll motorway. The Act was modified in 1999 in order to favour the developments of public-private partnerships, under the management of the Motorway Agency. Eventually, an operating Concession was agreed as part of the A4 motorway between Krakow and Katowice and the first real concession for construction and realisation of a new motorway was closed in October 2000, for a section of the A2 motorway between Poznan and Konin, on the Berlin-Warsaw axis.
  • Hungarian E-Vignette User Guide

    Hungarian E-Vignette User Guide

    HUNGARIAN E-VIGNETTE USER GUIDE 2017 E-VIGNETTE ROAD USE AUTHORIZATION The e-vignette user charge system applies to motorcycles, passenger cars and their trailers, as well as cargo vehicles with a maximum permissible gross weight of 3.5 tons, campers and buses, and their trailers. IMPORTANT TO KNOW ABOUT E-VIGNETTES • Road use authorization must be always paid for before you enter the toll section; purchased e-vignettes do not constitute authorized road use retroactively. In the case of a purchase within the validity period, the starting date of validity is always the date of purchase. • If you purchase more than one e-vignette at a time, please make sure that you have specified the dates of your journeys (uses) accurately. • In order to avoid unauthorized road use, please always check the registration number, the country code, the vehicle category and the validity period on your control slip when making your purchase. • In case of electronic purchase of the road use authorization, the confirming notification serves as a proof of purchase. From 1 January 2017, changes will be introduced with respect to the toll speedway network and the toll-free sections, therefore, we request you to study the information below in detail. TOLL-FREE SECTIONS According to the decree in force, the following road sections can be used toll free: • the following sections of the M0 expressway: ◦ the section between Main Road 1 and the M5 motorway, ◦ the section between expressway M4 (sign of expressway 4) and Motorway M3, ◦ Megyeri Bridge (the section between Main Road 2 and Main Road 11).