DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 3 in Csongrad County of M5 Motorway [EBRD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 3 in Csongrad County of M5 Motorway [EBRD Project No. 50630/503/501 SECTION MARKED III (BETWEEN CHAINAGE 161.0 AND 174.5 KM) IN CSONGRÁD COUNTY OF M5 MOTORWAY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN DETAIL UVATERV RT. BUDAPEST, February 1999 02 03. 99 Mrs Sign. Mrs Sign. MÁTAI Sign. CORRECTED AS AGREED WITH BÖRZSÖNYI HERNÁDYNÉ József THE CLIENT Péterné LÁNG J. 01 12. 98 Mrs Sign. Mrs Sign. MÁTAI FIRST ISSUE BÖRZSÖNYI HERNÁDYNÉ József Péterné LÁNG J. Name Sign. Name Sign. Name Sign. REV. DATE REASON OF REVISION DESIGNER CHECKED APPROVED PROJECT MANAGER DIVISION DIRECTOR Sign. DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL Sign. KOVÁCSHÁZY Frigyes KOVÁCSHÁZY Frigyes Dr KARSAY L. Client: ROAD MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION DIRECTORATE OFFICE OF MOTORWAY DEVELOPMENT H-1024 Budapest, Fényes Elek u. 7-13 Engineer: UVATERV ÚT-, VASÚTTERVEZŐ RT. [UVATERV ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD.] H-1117 Budapest, Dombóvári út 17-19 Project: M5 Motorway Csongrád County section (126.4 – 174.5 km) Designed phase: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN DETAIL Section III 161.0 – 174.5 km Designed CSONGRÁD COUNTY branch: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Project No.: 50630/503/501 Detail: Special mark: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN DETAIL Drawing No.: 2 Scale: 2 Drawing Area: m Prepared by: UVATERV Rt.: MÁTAI József chief coordinator Mrs BÖRZSÖNYI Péterné compilation, reconciliation Mrs KÓKAINÉ GILYÉN Mária landscape protection KÜZMÖS György traffic assessment ORBÁN Ferenc traffic assessment ÖKO Rt.: Dr TOMBÁCZ Endre compilation MAGYAR Emőke compilation introduction, preliminaries, influencing factors, estimation of impact area, summary NAGY István communal environment Mrs PÁL Tiborné communal environment Vibrocomp Kft. Dr BITE Pálné noise and vibration protection Mrs MÉSZÁROSNÉ KIS Ágnes protection of air purity KRONA Kft.: PAP Zoltán measurements of air quality ORNIS Kft. KOVÁCS Éva wildlife, ecosystems VARGA Csaba wildlife, ecosystems Dr MAJOR Pál earth, sub-surface waters Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................................7 1. preliminaries, Presentation of the Planned Motorway...................................................................................8 1.1. Planning Process ..........................................................................................................................................8 1.2. Presentation of the track...............................................................................................................................9 1.3. Horizontal and altitude characteristics of the tracking...............................................................................10 1.4. Earthworks .................................................................................................................................................11 1.5. Present and expectable traffic ....................................................................................................................12 2. Influencing Factors and Impact Processes of Principle, Assessment of Impact Area ...............................22 2.1. Definition of the influencing factors and impact processes induced by the activity..................................22 2.2. Impact area assessment, determination of the area under examination......................................................24 3. Sensitivity of the area under examination .....................................................................................................30 4. Presentation of the Current Condition of the Environment, Description and Evaluation of the Expectable Changes.............................................................................................................................................33 4.1. Geographical features.................................................................................................................................35 4.2. Air ..............................................................................................................................................................37 4.2.1. current air quality situation...........................................................................................................37 4.2.2. Air quality examinations made in framework of the present work...............................................40 4.2.2.1. Evaluation of the present air quality...............................................................................40 4.2.2.2. Assessments carried out on basis of the measurement results........................................42 4.2.2.3. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................42 4.2.3. Expectable environmental impact of the planned investment project ..........................................43 4.2.3.1. Air pollution during the construction .............................................................................43 4.2.3.2. Air pollution during operation........................................................................................44 4.2.3.3. Effect of traffic distraction .............................................................................................49 4.2.3.4. Air pollution from average .............................................................................................49 4.2.4. Precision of the impact area, the necessary environmental measures...........................................49 4.2.5. Major uncertainties and missing data ...........................................................................................50 4.2.6. Implementation of the monitoring system ....................................................................................50 4.2.7. Summary of statements on the protection of air purity.................................................................51 4.3. Surface waters ............................................................................................................................................51 4.3.1. Rainwater drainage.......................................................................................................................51 4.3.2. water pollution from Average.......................................................................................................54 4.3.3. Shaping of hydraulic engineering facilities ..................................................................................55 4.4. Earth, sub-surface waters ...........................................................................................................................55 4.4.1. Geological and hydrogeological features of the areas touched by the planned track...................55 4.4.1.1. Geological features.........................................................................................................55 4.4.1.2. Soils, sensitivity of soils .................................................................................................58 4.4.1.3. Groundwaters, sub-surface waters..................................................................................59 4.4.1.4. Climatic conditions.........................................................................................................61 4.4.2. Environmental impact...................................................................................................................61 4.4.2.1. Estimation of the impact of lead emission from vehicles ...............................................62 4.4.2.2. Impact of the washing-in of oil pollution getting on the motorway in case of average..65 4.4.2.3. Impact of the salty solutions washing in, in the course of de-frosting the motorway ....67 4.4.2.4. Impacts from the phases of construction of the motorway.............................................68 4.4.2.5. Impact from the occupation of area by the motorway on the groundwater course of the affected area..............................................................................................................68 4.4.2.6. Impact of the motorway on the water supply wells in the environment of the track......69 4.4.3. Planned mining sites.....................................................................................................................71 4.5. Wildlife - ecosystem...................................................................................................................................72 4.5.1. Purpose and method of work........................................................................................................72 4.5.2. Delimitation of the expectable impact area ..................................................................................73 4.5.3. General characterisation of the impact area..................................................................................73 4.5.3.1. Original natural vegetation of the region touched by the track ......................................74 4.5.3.2. Features of land use in the region touched by the track .................................................74 4.5.4. Definition of the influencing factors and of the natural elements being the impact carriers ........75 4.5.4.1. Occupation of area to occur through the building-in of the track in the area affected directly by the project.....................................................................................................75 4.5.4.2. Establishment of the mining sites of building materials to be used for the construction ....................................................................................................................75
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL TRANS/WP.5/2005/16/Add.8 24 October 2005 ENGLISH ONLY ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (Eighteenth session, 15-16 September 2005, agenda item 3(b)) MONITORING OF DEVELOPMENTS RELEVANT FOR THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND AREAS Infrastructure bottlenecks and missing links Transmitted by the Government of Hungary According to the report on “Infrastructure Bottlenecks and Missing Links in the European Transport Network” bottlenecks can be caused by: (1) insufficient infrastructure capacity; (2) low quality of transport infrastructure. In the same manner, the phenomenon of a “missing link” may be considered as a situation in which the quality of service has extremely low values due to the fact that no direct link exists between two points. As described in the above-mentioned document, as a simplified method, for individual road categories, one may take the following capacities in terms of number of vehicles as the average daily traffic: − 4-lane motorway: 40,000 – 60,000 PCU/24 hrs − roads of 2 lanes: 8,000 – 12,000 PCU/24 hrs As in the case of roads, there are a great number of factors determining the bottlenecks on a railway line. It is practically impossible to concentrate all elements in a single bottleneck measure. In order to reach practical measures it appeared appropriate to take the following capacity limits: TRANS/WP.5/2005/16/Add.8 page 2 − Single track main lines: 1 x 60 – 80 trains/day − Double track main lines: 2 x 100 – 200 trains/day According to that definition, the bottlenecks regarding the Hungarian TEN road network are described below.
    [Show full text]
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Budapest and Central Danube Region
    Touristic areas of the Budapest and Central Danube Region www.hungary.com Talent for entertaining Forest Tourinform Office Etyek-Buda wine region Residence Kunság wine region Castle National Park Castle ruin Region’s border Museum Highway Thermal/wellness bath Railway Airport Ferry World Heritage Budapest – Central Danube Region “Why Budapest and its surrounding area?” This is the obvious question holiday makers will ask when planning their travels, and we hope to provide the answer. Budapest, Heroes’ Square Budapest because: • it is the cultural, political and transportation centre of Hungary; • it is built on both side of the Danube, the great European river that is registered as a World Heritage panorama; • nature is safeguarded in two national parks and a number of environmental protection areas; • it has represented a “multicultural Europe” for centuries – over 200 nearby villages are populated by Hungarians, Serbs, Slovaks and Germans (Swabians); • it has a strong artistic and cultural heritage; • there’s always something happening: festivals, concerts, theatre perform- ances, sports competitions, exhibitions, church events, wine celebrations or handicraft fairs; • there are many outdoor activities to enjoy: trekking, rock climbing, biking, horse riding, golf, rowing, swimming, potholing or fl ying; • its restaurants offer not only Hungarian cuisine – and wine and palinka – but food from all over the world. Don’t hesitate – come to Budapest, the centre of things! Széchenyi Thermal Baths (We have marked our suggested “must-see” destinations with ***. However, these are naturally subjective selections, and we hope that our guests will fi nd their own three-star experiences.) MT ZRT www.itthon.hu Visegrád Castle Games 1 Budapest – Central Danube Region Budapest Buda Castle and Chain Bridge When you arrive in Budapest, head to the centre and drink in the view of the city’s two parts, divided by the Danube and linked by the bridges that cross it.
    [Show full text]
  • BTC EGTC, Region's Bridge of Innovation
    BTC EGTC, 20 region’s bridge 18 of innovation Preface City mayors from three countries collaboration. This is particularly have created the idea of the important for us, since we want to Grouping in 2009. keep economical, commercial, social The Grouping was established in contacts in the region covered by order to achieve their main goal BTC EGTC group. - the reducing of development The Grouping’s primary goal is a diff erences in the area surrounding harmonical regional development, the Hungarian-Romanian-Serbian improvement of the economical, border. social and territorial cohesion, as The establishment of BTC EGTC well as enabling a successful cross- provides such opportunities, which border collaboration. help to remove the borders in the region, and build bridges between BTC EGTC the local authorities, in their organization 2 BTC EGTC Introduction On 17th June 2009, almost fi fty mayors from the triple-border region municipalities decided to establish a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) named „Banat - Triplex Confi nium” in a summit in Mórahalom. The headquarters of the Group is also in Mórahalom. The initial membership of BTC EGTC contained 37 Hungarian municipalities, 37 Romanian municipalities, as well as 8 Serbian towns as observing members. Another three Hungarian municipalities joined the Group in 2012 - Csengele, Kistelek and Zá- kányszék. Banat-Triplex Confi nium EGTC members are the following: BTC EGTC, region’s bridge of innovation 2018 Hungary • Ambrózfalva • Ferencszállás • Kunbaja • Öttömös • Apátfalva
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    C 171/12 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 19.5.2020 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2020/C 171/07) This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1). COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT ‘Duna/Dunai’ Reference number PDO-HU-A1345-AM02 Date of communication: 9.2.2020 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Addition of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora, Újszilvás and Bácsszentgyörgy to the demarcated area (a) Product specification headings affected: IV. Demarcated area (b) Single document heading affected: Demarcated geographical area (c) Reasons: — The Wine Community Council of the Kunság Region (Kunsági Borvidék Hegyközségi Tanácsa) amended the product specification for the ‘Kunság/Kunsági’ PDO. The areas of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora and Újszilvás classified as Class I and II according to the vineyard cadastre of wine-producing regions were added to the demarcated area. The change affects the demarcated area in the product specification for the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO and has been included in this application. The characteristics of the areas included in the vineyard cadastre correspond to the demarcated area of the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO. Vine-growing is one of the traditional economic activities of local inhabitants. The classification of the wine region and the possibility to produce the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO generates significant employment and income in these municipalities and contributes greatly towards the local tourism industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary General Report 2015
    HUNGARY GENERAL REPORT 2015 ASECAP STUDY AND INFORMATION DAYS MADRID, 23 - 25 MAY 2016 Network length Length of the motorway network in Hungary as of 31 December 2015: 1.180 km. The length of the motorway, expressway and trunk road sections operated by the Hungarian Public Road Nonprofit Pte Ltd Co. (MK NZrt.) as of 31 December 2015 are: 1071 km. The Hungarian Public Road Company is responsible for the operation and maintenance of M1, M3, M30, M31, M35, M43, M7, M8 Motorways; M5 Motorway between km sections 13 - 17.4, M6 Motorway between km sections 14 - 22,3 and several expressways (M0, M2,…). 2 AKA Zrt. (AKA Alföld Concession Motorway Co. Ltd.) is a Concession Company responsible for the operation and maintenance of M5 Motorway between km section 17+400 and 173+895, total length of 156,5 km. Overall length of the bridges on the M5 motorway are 3,7 km. No more sections are foreseen at the moment to be included in this Concession. M6 Duna Autópálya Koncessziós Zrt. (M6 Danube Concession Motorway Co. Ltd.) is a Concession Company responsible for the operation and maintenance of M6 between km sections 22+150 and 76+200 and M8 between km sections 5+750 and 10+300 which sections were opened to traffic on 11 June 2006. The bridges on the above motorways are 2,81 km long (including all types of bridges). No more sections are foreseen at the moment to be included in this Concession. M6 Tolna Autópálya Koncessziós Zrt. (M6 Tolna Motorway Concession Ltd.) is a Concession Company responsible for the design, construction, finance, operation and maintenance of M6 motorway between km sections 76+200 and 141+300.
    [Show full text]
  • Rankings Municipality of Pusztaszer
    9/30/2021 Maps, analysis and statistics about the resident population Demographic balance, population and familiy trends, age classes and average age, civil status and foreigners Skip Navigation Links UNGHERIA / Alföld és Észak / Province of Csongrád / Pusztaszer Powered by Page 1 L'azienda Contatti Login Urbistat on Linkedin Adminstat logo DEMOGRAPHY ECONOMY RANKINGS SEARCH UNGHERIA Municipalities Powered by Page 2 Algyo Stroll up beside >> L'azienda Contatti Login Urbistat on Linkedin Ferencszállás AdminstatAmbrózfalva logo DEMOGRAPHY ECONOMY RANKINGS SEARCH Földeák Apátfalva UNGHERIA Forráskút Árpádhalom Hódmezovásárhely Ásotthalom Királyhegyes Baks Kistelek Balástya Kiszombor Bordány Klárafalva Csanádalberti Kövegy Csanádpalota Kübekháza Csanytelek Magyarcsanád Csengele Makó Csongrád Maroslele Derekegyház Mártély Deszk Mindszent Dóc Mórahalom Domaszék Nagyér Eperjes Nagylak Fábiánsebestyén Nagymágocs Felgyo Nagytoke Óföldeák Ópusztaszer Öttömös Pitvaros Pusztamérges Pusztaszer Röszke Ruzsa Sándorfalva Szatymaz Szeged Szegvár Székkutas Szentes Powered by Page 3 Tiszasziget L'azienda Contatti Login Urbistat on Linkedin Provinces Tömörkény Adminstat logo DEMOGRAPHY ECONOMY RANKINGS SEARCH Újszentiván UNGHERIABÁCS-KISKUN Üllés BÉKÉS Zákányszék CSONGRÁD Zsombó Regions Alföld és Észak Dunántúl Alföld és Észak Dunántúl Alföld és Észak Dunántúl Közép- Magyarország Közép- Magyarország Municipality of Pusztaszer Territorial extension of Municipality of PUSZTASZER and related population density, population per gender and number of households,
    [Show full text]
  • 1/16 JEGYZ Ő K Ö NYV Pusztaszer Község Önkormányzata Képviselő
    JEGYZŐKÖNYV Pusztaszer Község Önkormányzata Képviselő-testületének üléséről Az ülés időpontja: 2016. április 28. helye: Csengelei Közös Önkormányzati Hivatal Pusztaszeri Kirendeltsége ülésterme (6769 Pusztaszer, Kossuth u. 45.) minősítése: nyilvános jellege: rendes sorszáma: 2016/4 Jelen vannak: Máté Gábor polgármester Fülöp Pál képviselő Gyurász Sándor Lászlóné képviselő Kósáné Buknicz Mária képviselő Nagy Emese alpolgármester, képviselő Sági Mihály képviselő dr. Jaksa Tibor aljegyző Tóth Mónika jegyzőkönyv-vezető Hiányzik: - igazoltan: Magyar Gábor Ferenc képviselő - igazolatlanul: - Máté Gábor polgármester: Tisztelettel köszöntöm a képviselő-testület tagjait, külön köszöntöm kapitány urat, Szabó Zsoltot, Ördög István urat a katasztrófavédelem oldaláról, mezőőrünket, Szabó Sándort. Megállapítom a képviselő-testület határozatképes, a hét fős tagságból jelen van 6 fő. Egy javaslatom lenne napirendi pont sorrendmódosításra. Akkor a katasztrófavédelem beszámolóját tegyük a második helyre. Első napirendi pont a rendőrség beszámolója, második a katasztrófavédelem, harmadik lesz a mezőőri beszámoló, negyedik a költségvetés és ötödik lesz az alapítvány alapító okirata. Van-e egyéb javaslat esetleg napirendi pontokra? Amennyiben nincs akkor az előbb vázolt módosítás alapján, aki a napirendi pontokat elfogadja, kérem, kézfelemeléssel jelezze. A döntéshozatalban résztvevők száma: 6 fő A döntésből kizárt önkormányzati képviselő neve: - A kizárás indoka: - A szavazás számszerű eredménye: 6 igen szavazattal 0 nem szavazattal 0 tartózkodással a Képviselő-testület
    [Show full text]
  • Kistelek-Sándorfalvi Körzet Erdőterve 2007-2016 ______
    Kistelek-Sándorfalvi körzet erdőterve 2007-2016 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Az I. kötet tartalomjegyzéke Bevezető. A körzeti erdőtervezés 2 1. Hatósági eljárások 4 1.1. Előzetes jegyzőkönyv 5 1.2. Zárójegyzőkönyv 26 1.3. Határozatok 40 A körzetben érvényét vesztett erdőállomány-gazdálkodási tervek 42 2. Táblázatok, statisztikák a körzet teljes területére 67 2.1. Területi adatok 68 2.1.2. Helységhatáros területkimutatás 68 2.1.3. Rendeltetések kimutatása – elsődleges és további rendeltetések együtt (Halmozott terület hektárban) 68 2.1.4.A. Elsődleges rendeltetések területkimutatása 68 2.1.4.B. További rendeltetések területkimutatása I. 68 2.1.4.C. További rendeltetések területkimutatása II. 68 2.1.5. Egyéb részletek területkimutatása 68 2.1.6. Területváltozás a körzetben 75 2.2. Termőhelyi adatok 76 2.2.1. Termőhelytípus-változatok megoszlása 76 2.2.2. Faállománytípusok klímák szerint 76 2.3. Állapot adatok 80 2.3.1. Korosztály táblázatok 80 2.3.2.A. Vágásos erdők - korosztály táblázat fafajonként 80 2.3.2.D. Faanyagtermelést nem szolgáló erdők - korosztály táblázat fafajonként 80 2.3.3. Faállománytípusok megoszlása fatermőképességi csoportok szerint 80 2.3.4. Vágásérettségi korokhoz tartozó terület fafajok szerint 80 2.3.5. Vágásérettségi csoportok területe fafajok szerint 100 évre 80 2.3.6. Vágásérettségi csoportok terület és fakészlet adatai fafajok szerint 30 évre 80 2.3.7. Záródás minősítése faállománytípusonként 80 2.3.8. Erdőterület megoszlása károsítók szerint 80 2.3.10. Állapotadatok változásának áttekintő táblázata 105 2.3.11. Fafajok terület- és fakészlet-adatainak változása 106 2.3.12. Fafajok átlagos vágásérettségi korának változása 107 2.4. Tervadatok 108 Hosszú távú tervadatok a körzet teljes területére 108 2.4.1.A.
    [Show full text]
  • First Results in Modelling Objective Well-Being in Hungary at Lower Territorial Level*2
    REGIONAL STATISTICS, 2014, VOL 4, No 2: 71–86; DOI: 10.15196/RS04205 NAGY GÁBORa) – KOÓS BÁLINTb)1 First results in modelling objective well-being 2 in Hungary at lower territorial level* Abstract Developing complex indicators measuring economic output, added value and indicators relying on an entirely different basis, researchers worked on the assumption that economic output does not correlate strongly with people’s happiness or quality of life. Most measurements relate to countries and federal states. Only a few seek to present or model differences at lower territorial levels. This study discloses the first results of pilot calculations that have been performed as part of Hungary’s Social Renewal Programme. These explore differences at the level of Hungarian districts (LAU1) with the proviso, that the spatial structure presented only reflects what is called objective well-being. A more comprehensive picture can be obtained only if the subjective well-being dimensions incorporating and weighted by the results of a large-scale sample survey, conducted in the meantime, are also taken into account. Keywords: well-being, spatial structure, model-calculation, weighting process, districts. Preface Developing complex indicators measuring economic output and added value (HDI, UNDP Millennium Development Goals), and indicators relying on an entirely different basis (the National Happiness Index and well-being indexes with various content) (see e.g. Constanza 2009, Diener–Biswas-Diener 2002, Booysen 2002, Beyond GDP 2009, Stieglitz 2009, Atlas… – The World Bank 2013, CIW 2012, Kovacevic 2010, Marks et al. 2006), researchers worked on the assumption that economic output does not correlate strongly with people’s happiness or quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • El?Adas Cime
    PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION IN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN HUNGARY 1990- Miklós Murányi Sarolta Beregi Toth October, 2009. Seoul PPP PILOTE PROJECTS INTERMINISTERIAL COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE AND DECIDE: • Tourism (conference center) • Justice (prison) • Health care (Hospital) • Local Government (Sport stadium) PPP PILOTE PROJECTS • Education (student dormitory) • Infrastructure (fast train link from city of Budapest to Ferihegy International Airport) • Residental developments (appartements for long term rent) • Motorways FAR THE LARGEST SEGMENT • Expressway development program of the government in PPP MAIN TRANSPORTATION ARTERIES IN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD OF HUNGARY Tornyosnémeti MainMain transporttransport corridorscorridors inin Záhony V. UA Lónya HUNGARYHUNGARY Barabás Beregsurány Parassapuszta Miskolc IV. VII. Rajka SK Salgótarján Emőd Tiszabecs Hegyeshalom Nyíregyháza Medve A Komárom Eger Gyöngyös Csengersima Polgár Győr Füzesabony Debrecen Sopron Tatabánya BUDAPEST Szombathely Székesfehérvár Szolnok Veszprém Rábafüzes RO Biharkeresztes Zalaegerszeg Balatonaliga Kecskemét Zamárdi Békéscsaba Kiskunfélegyháza additional Tornyisz.miklós TINA Szekszárd SLO Letenye Szekszárd Szeged Kaposvár Sükösd elements V. Nagylak Baja Mohács Röszke Pécs HR proposed YU IV. Illocska TINA X/A. V/C. VII. elements MOTORWAY NETWORK OF HUNGARY IN 1993 UA Tisza Miskolc SK Salgótarján Nyíregyháza A M3 Duna Gyöngyös Győr Füzesabony Sopron M1 Tatabánya BUDAPEST Debrecen Szombathely Székesfehérvár Szolnok Veszprém M0 Baliga M5 RO Dunaújváros Zalaegerszeg M7 Kecskemét
    [Show full text]
  • Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál Gyál, M5, M0
    Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál Gyál, M5, M0 175.000 négyzetméter www.prologisgyal.com Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál Gyál A parkról About the park Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál egy modern disztribúciós Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál is a state-of-the-art központ, melynek 175.000 négyzetméteres területén distribution center that currently consists of six jelenleg 6 épület található. A park magas minőségű, ügyfél buildings totaling 175,000 square meters of igényekhez igazított raktáregységeket kínál. Az épületek warehouse and office space. The Park offers teljesítik az összes modern raktározási elvárást és ideális warehouse units of the highest quality, flexible units feltételeket biztosítanak a hazai és nemzetközi gyártó és fitted to customers' requirements. The buildings fulfill logisztikai szereplők számára. all modern warehousing expectations and offers ideal conditions for domestic and international manufacturing and distribution. Elhelyezkedés Location A Prologis Park Budapest - Gyál Budapest központjától Prologis Park Budapest-Gyál is located approximately 18 kilométerre délkeletre, a Liszt Ferenc nemzetközi 18 kilometers southeast of the Budapest City Centre repülőtértől 17 kilométerre, a Románia és Szerbia felé and 17 kilometers west of Budapest International 175.000 vezető M5-ös autópálya és az M0-ás körgyűrű Airport. The park is adjacent to the M5 motorway (that kereszteződésénél található. leads south towards Serbia and Romania) and the M5- négyzetméter ipari terület M0 junction. square meters of industrial space 18 Előnyök kilométerre
    [Show full text]