DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................... 2 I CHARGE AND DEFENCE ........................................................................................................................... 4 II EVIDENCE .................................................................................................................................................. 19 III JURISDICTION OF THE COURT ......................................................................................................... 24 IV REASONING OF THE DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT ..................................................... 26 1. ETHNIC RELATIONS AND POLITICAL SITUATION IN RWANDA UP TO 1994 .............................. 26 2. GENOCIDE AS DEFINED BY CONSTITUENT ELEMENTS AND IN RWANDA IN 1994 .............. 27 3. GACACA SYSTEM ..................................................................................................................................... 33 4. ON THE OVERALL RELIABILITY OF THE EVIDENCE ....................................................................... 34 5. ALLEGATION OF TORTURE AND USABILITY OF WITNESS ACCOUNTS ..................................... 40 6. ACTUAL AUTHORITY OF BAZARAMBA IN HIS COMMUNITY ....................................................... 49 7. BAZARAMBA’S COMPLICITY IN ACTS OF GENOCIDE ..................................................................... 51 7.1 Bazaramba’s alibi ............................................................................................................................ 51 7.2. Inflicting on Tutsis living in Maraba sector and its surroundings conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction in whole or in part ............................................................. 52 7.2.1 Dissemination of propaganda and incitement of Hutus to kill.........................................52 7.2.2 Road blocks and night patrols..........................................................................................59 7.2.3 Bazaramba’s complicity in forcing Tutsis to leave their homes and in destroying their homes ..............................................................................................................................62 7.2.4 Bazaramba’s role in distributing to Hutus property appropriated from Tutsis.................66 7.3 Killings ........................................................................................................................................... 68 7.3.1 Training relating to the killings and acts of violence, and procurement of weapons.......68 7.3.2 Maraba sector and its surroundings..................................................................................71 7.3.2.1 Five unidentified Tutsi men ............................................................................... 71 7.3.2.2 Emmanuel, Dina, a Tutsi woman by the name of Agnes Mukamutesi and an unidentified Tutsi woman .................................................................................. 72 7.3.2.3 Bellansilla Mugagashugi ................................................................................... 80 7.3.2.4 12-year-old Tutsi boy by the name of Mujemana ............................................. 87 7.3.2.5 Agnes and an infant child .................................................................................. 90 7.3.2.6 Tutsi man by the name of Anderea .................................................................... 92 7.3.2.7 Tutsi woman by the name of Beatrice ............................................................... 93 7.3.3 Cyahinda church and its surroundings..............................................................................96 7.3.4 Mount Nyakizu and its surroundings.............................................................................101 8. APPLICABLE LAW ................................................................................................................................... 110 9. FINDINGS OF GUILT AND DISMISSALS OF CHARGES .................................................................... 110 10. SENTENCING .......................................................................................................................................... 112 WITNESS STATEMENTS ENCLOSED WITH THE JUDGMENT 2 TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS DRC Democratic Republic of Congo FAR Rwandese Armed Forces FPR Front Patriotique Rwandaise (also RPF) HRW Human Rights Watch ICTR International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Ibuka national genocide survivors’ association Inkotanyi a term used to refer to members of the RFP, i.e. the Rwandese Patriotic Front. The word literally means “fierce fighter” and originally referred to the militia of the 19th-century king Rwabugiri Interahamwe a trained paramilitary group consisting of Hutus who played a key role in the acts of genocide Inyenzi a Kinyarwandan word for “cockroach”, commonly used to refer to the RFP MDR Mouvement démocratique républicain MRND Mouvement révolutionnaire national pour le développement from 1975 to 1991; from 1991, Mouvement républicain national pour le développement et la démocratie OPAM Organisation for HIV Positive African Men PDistrict Court Parti démocrate chrétien (Christian Democratic Party) PDI Parti démocrate islamique PL Parti libéral PSD Parti sociale démocrate RTLM Radio Télevision Libre des Mille Collines RPA Rwandese Patriotic Army RPF Rwandese Patriotic Front, the same as the French FPR UEBR Union des Eglises Baptistes au Rwanda (Union of Baptist Churches of Rwanda) UNAMIR United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 3 VASA A witness for the defendant whose name was ordered not to be disclosed and who was heard in the absence of the public; decisions nos. 812 of 7 September 2009, 1201 of 4 December 2009 and 2 of 5 January 2010 4 I CHARGE AND DEFENCE The defendant has been indicted for the following offences: A PRIMARY CHARGE: GENOCIDE Criminal Code, Chapter 13:4 (987/1974) 1 January 1993 – 31 May 1994 Abroad (Republic of Rwanda, Butare prefecture, Nyakizu commune, Maraba sector and its surroundings, Cyahinda church and its surroundings, and Mount Nyakizu and its surroundings) 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 The native population of Rwanda is made up of three ethnic groups: the Hutu, the Tutsi and the Twa. The Hutu and the Tutsi are the largest of the groups. The majority of the population is Hutu. 1.2 Until 1959, Rwanda was a monarchy led by a Tutsi monarch. The form of government changed from monarchy to republic in 1959 when the Tutsi monarch was overthrown by the Hutu. 1.3 The tensions between the Hutu and the Tutsi originating in the colonial era simmered beneath the surface until 6 April 1994, on which date they erupted into genocide. The genocide is deemed to have started in earnest at the moment when the airplane carrying President of the Republic of Rwanda Juvénal Habyarimana and President of the Republic of Burundi Cyprien Ntaryamira, who had been conducting peace talks concerning the Republic of Rwanda in Tanzania, crashed at the airport in Kigali, the capital of Rwanda. 1.4 The administrative vacuum arising from the death of President Habyarimana allowed the Hutu Power party, representing extremist Hutus, and the interim government formed by it to declare itself to be in control of the country. Following this, the Rwandan army and the Interahamwe militia established by President Habyarimana set up roadblocks around Kigali. Across the country, the Presidential Guard, the militia and other paramilitary organisations started to kill Tutsis as well as moderate Hutus who supported peace and power-sharing. On 12 April, when the Rwandan authorities announced on Radio Rwanda that,” we need to unite against the enemy, the only enemy and this is the enemy that we have always known...it’s the enemy who wants to reinstate the former feudal monarchy”, it became clear that the Tutsi were the target of wide- spread, systematic and extremely brutal genocide. The Hutu intended to destroy the Tutsi in whole. 1.5 The genocide reached its peak in the period between 14 and 21 April 1994. After the president of the interim government, the prime minister and some key ministers had travelled to Butare and Gikongoro, the killings started also in these regions, which despite the planning and preparation conducted in the local security councils established specifically for this purpose had remained peaceful until then. Thousands of people, unsuspecting and often encouraged by local officials, gathered in churches, schools, hospitals and other public buildings in hopes of finding safety. In reality, they were led into traps to ensure rapid and as widespread as possible extermination. 1.6 The genocide in which neither women, children nor the elderly were spared continued until 18 July 1994, when Kigali was occupied by the RFP, a movement formed by the Tutsi. 1.7 The genocide claimed from 500,000 to 1,000,000 or more victims, a large number of people furthermore being injured or maimed and most of them suffering permanent mental or physical injury. 2 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE OF RWANDA 5 2.1 Rwanda is divided into eleven prefectures, each of which is governed by a prefect. The prefectures in turn are divided into sub-prefectures and communes, the latter being headed by burgomasters, i.e. mayors appointed by the president. The communes are divided into sectors and cells headed by councilmen and responsables.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amended Indictment Acte D'accusation Amende
    , INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA ...... ~ Case No. ICTR-96-9-I N de dossier:ICTR-96-9-I THE PROSECUTOR LE PROCUREUR DU TRIBUNAL AGAINST CONTRE LAD ISLAS NTAGANZWA LADISLAS NTAGANZWA AMENDED ACTE D'ACCUSATION INDICTMENT AMENDE The Prosecutor of the International Le Procureur du Tribunal Penal Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, pursuant to International pour Ie Rw"anda, en vertu des the authority stipulated in Atiicle 17 of the pouvoirs que lui confere I'article 17 elu Statute of the International Criminal Statut du Tribunal Penal International pour Tribunal for Rwanda ('the Statute of the Ie Rwanda ("Ie Statut du Tribunal") accuse: Tri b unal ') charges: LADISLAS NTAGANZWA LADISLAS NT AGANZW A with CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT eI'ENTENTE EN VUE DE GENOCIDE, GENOCIDE C9MMETTRE LE GENOCIDE, de COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE', GENOCIDE de COMPLICITE DE DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT GENOCIDE, d'INCITATION TO COMMIT GENOCIDE, CRIMES PUBLIQUE ET DIRECTE A AGAINST HUMANITY, and COMMETTRE LE GENOCIDE, de VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 3 CRIMES CONTRE L' HUMANITE, et ele COMMON TO THE GENEVA VIOLATIONS DE L'ARTICLE 3 CONVENTIONS AND ADDITIONAL COMMUN AUX CONVENTIONS DE PROTOCOL II, offences stipulated in GENtVE ET DU PROTOCOLE Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Statute of the ADDITIONNEL II, crimes prevus aux Tribunal. articles 2, 3 et 4 du Statut du Tribunal. " PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/198713/ 1. CONTEXTE HISTORIQUE 1. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1. CONTEXTE HISTORIQUE 1.1 The revolution of 1959 marked the 1.1 La revolution de 1959 marque Ie beginning ofa period of ethnic clashes debut d'une periode d'affrontements between the Hutu and the Tutsi in Rwanda, ethniques entre les Hutu et les Tutsi au causing hundreds of Tutsi to die and Rwanda, provoquant au cours des annees thousands more to flee the country in the qui ont immediatement suivi, des centaines years immediately following.
    [Show full text]
  • Samantha Richards Mphil Thesis
    Lessons Learnt From Rwanda: The Need for Harmonisation of Penalties Between the ICC and its Member States Samantha Richards MPhil Thesis Student ID: 033365563 Submitted: 30 November 2014 Word count (excluding footnotes): 58,012 Abstract An examination of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its policy of complementarity in the context of the presumption, that for complementarity to be effective, the national courts will have to undertake the majority of the investigations and prosecutions of extraordinary crimes. This will then be discussed in terms of the current setup whereby national courts are permitted by Article 80 of the Rome Statute 1998, to apply their own penalties when conducting trials at the national level. The analysis serves to highlight that the current situation is not conducive to proportionate or consistent sentencing or penalties, as the death penalty may still be applied by national courts, whilst in accordance with human rights norms, the ICC only has custodial sentences available to its judges. In addition to this the discussion highlights that many national jurisdictions where the crimes take place are in need of capacity building so as to rebuild or to reinforce their legal systems to a level where they are able to seek justice for themselves. This leads into a discussion of the potential for outreach whereby the ICC may also be able to lead by example and take the opportunity to impart their sentencing objectives and procedural norms, in an attempt to facilitate consistent and proportionate justice at both the national and international level, so as to aid the fight to close the impunity gap.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Security Counciland Transitional Justice
    The UN Security Council and Transitional Justice Dr Rebecca Brubaker Case Studies Authors Dr Rebecca Brubaker Cale Salih Dr Adam Day Professor Phil Clark Dr Nicola Palmer Dr Robyn Gill-Leslie Dr Rebecca Brubaker Dr Rebecca Brubaker is Senior Policy Adviser at United Nations University Centre for Policy Research. Case Studies by: Dr. Rebecca Brubaker, Cale Salih, Dr Adam Day, Professor Phil Clark, Dr Nicola Palmer, and Dr Robyn Gill-Leslie This research was mandated and funded by the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland and advised by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Swiss Confederation or OHCHR. A debt of thanks is owed to Priscilla Hayner, Sebastiaan Verelst, Julia Raue, the team at Security Council Report, the Swiss Taskforce Dealing with the Past and Prevention of Atrocities, and the participants in a July 2020 expert workshop for their insightful comments on the issues covered in this report. Additional thanks to Luise Quaritsch for her research support. The case studies in this report were completed in August 2020. ISBN: 978-92-808-6527-1 © United Nations University, 2021. All content (text, visualizations, graphics), except where otherwise specified or attributed, is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial-Share Alike IGO license (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). Using, re-posting and citing this content is allowed without prior permission. Citation: Dr Rebecca Brubaker (ed.), The UN Security Council and Transitional Justice (New York: United Nations University, 2021).
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report on Human Rights and Justice in Rwanda
    Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs Country Report on Human Rights and Justice in Rwanda Date 18 August 2016 Page 1 of 64 Country Report | August 2016 Edited by Sub-Saharan Africa Department, The Hague Disclaimer: The Dutch version of this report is leading. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands cannot be held accountable for misinterpretations based on the English version of the report. Page 2 of 64 Country Report on Rwanda | August 2016 Contents Contents ....................................................................................................... 3 1 Human Rights .............................................................................................. 6 1.1 Human Rights in General ................................................................................ 6 1.2 Torture and Abuse ....................................................................................... 11 1.2.1 Legislation .................................................................................................. 11 1.2.2 Torture by Military Personnel ......................................................................... 11 1.2.3 Police Abuse ................................................................................................ 13 1.2.4 Local Defence Forces .................................................................................... 13 1.2.5 Monitoring and Assistance ............................................................................. 14 1.3 Disappearances ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda: Suspect Transfers Signal New Stage in Genocide Trials
    Rwanda: Suspect transfers signal new stage in genocide trials Emmanuel Sehene Ruvugiro JusticeInfo.Net, March 25, 2019 On March 19, a Rwandan genocide suspect was arrested in the Netherlands. It is likely that he will be extradited to Rwanda for trial. Since the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) first transferred an accused person to Kigali in April 2012, extra- dition has accelerated. Now 19 people accused of genocide have been extradited to Rwanda by the country where they sought re- fuge. The ICTR has closed and so have the gacaca courts, but not Rwanda’s ordinary courts. For more than 15 years after the genocide, the Rwandan judiciary had very little chance of getting to try suspects outside Rwanda’s borders, due to lack of guarantees on the fairness of trials. But in April 2012, there was a big turning point when the UN’s International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in Tanzania handed over one of its accused to Kigali. This change came because of pressure on the ICTR to complete its work quickly. It was also the result of judicial reforms in Rwanda, including abolition of the death penalty and the establishment within the High Court of a specialized chamber for international crimes, responsible in particular for dealing with genocide cases transferred by third countries. In all these cases, Rwanda promised to ensure respect for the rights of the defence and to guarantee a fair trial. In the case of accused persons referred by the ICTR, their transfer may be cancelled if the ICTR, subsequently replaced by the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (MICT), considers that the rights of the defence have not been respected.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of the Rwandan Genocide
    Vol. 15(2), pp. 76-89, April-June 2021 DOI: 10.5897/AJPSIR2020.1312 Article Number: 30C217F66730 ISSN: 1996-0832 Copyright ©2021 African Journal of Political Science and Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJPSIR International Relations Review Political opportunism, impunity and the perpetuation of Victor’s Justice: A case of the Rwandan Genocide Mwansa Ancietos Department of Political and Administrative Studies, School of Social Sciences Mulungushi University, Kabwe, Zambia. Received 2 February, 2020; Accepted 9 March, 2021 The genocide in Rwanda remains one of the most tragic and horrendous events witnessed in Africa, and an important case study in the exploits of transitional justice. An approximated number of one million people were subjected to systematic rape, murder and torture with several thousands of people being displaced in the process of ethnic conflict in Rwanda-evidencing genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Rwanda provides yet another example of the need for justice in post-conflict states, and the need to protect human rights and the restoration of the dignity of human beings. However, a post-conflict situation has to contend with how this justice is dispensed, by whom, towards whom and to what end. This paper argues that partial justice was served (and continues to be) in Rwanda concomitant with victor’s justice and the political opportunism of the emergent Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) government. Key words: Political opportunism, genocide, impunity, transitional justice, human rights. INTRODUCTION In discussions and accounts of transitional justice, we culminated into the genocide in 1994. While this has can dispense justice and still not serve it at all.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leadership of Rwandan Armed Groups Abroad with a Focus on the Fdlr and Rud/Urunana
    RAKIYA OMAAR, CONSULTANT TO THE RWANDA DEMOBILISATION AND REINTEGRATION COMMISSION THE LEADERSHIP OF RWANDAN ARMED GROUPS ABROAD WITH A FOCUS ON THE FDLR AND RUD/URUNANA DECEMBER 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY………………………….…………………………………………………………….6 PREFACE……………………………………………………………..………………………………………………………8 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………….……………………………………………….10 1. THE OBSTACLES TO REPATRIATION: THE EXPERIENCES AND PERSPECTIVES OF RETURNEES………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….17 THE INTERESTS OF LEADERS IN DISCOURAGING REPATRIATION…………………………… ..17 Economic Self Interest…………………………………………………………………………………..17 Fear of Justice……………………………………………………………………………………………20 THE IMPEDIMENTS FACED BY POTENTIAL RETURNEES……………………………………….21 The Lack of Information and the Power of Misinformation………………………………………..21 False Information from Relatives in Rwanda………………………………………………………..23 The Threat and Reality of Violent Reprisals…………………………………………………………24 A Security Deterrent: The Long Distance to MONUC Stations…………………………………...27 2. WHO ARE THE LEADERS? THE PROCESS OF ESTABLISHING THEIR IDENTITY……………………………………………………………………............................................29 IDENTITY AND BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………………29 Reshuffle After Reshuffle ……………………………………………………….................................29 The Use of Cover Names………………………………………………………………………………..29 Life in Rwanda and in Exile: A Time-Consuming Process…………………………………………30 The “Unofficial” Influence of Well-Known Genocide Suspects Who Are Kept Out of the Public Limelight………………………………………………………………………………………………….31
    [Show full text]
  • ICTR Transfers Last Detainee to Rwanda
    ICTR transfers last detainee to Rwanda Edwin Musoni The New Times, July 25, 2013 The International Criminal Tribunal for RwandAir flight from Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, at Rwanda (ICTR) yesterday transferred to around 5p.m, under the custody of ICTR officials. Rwanda Genocide suspect Bernard Munyagi- He was then delivered to Rwandan prosecutors, shari from its custody in Arusha, Tanzania. who, in turn, handed him over to designated judicial police officers. The suspect under tight security, was paraded be- fore journalists for about 30 seconds and later whis- ked off to the special transit facility at Kigali Central Prison. He joins former Pastor Jean Uwinkindi, who was transferred by the ICTR in April last year but whose trial is yet to start in substance. “We would like to thank the ICTR generally for the significant vote of confidence it has given to the Rwandan justice system, and for the smooth execu- tion of this transfer. What happens next is following Bernard Munyagishari after being handed over to the the Rwandan laws, particularly the law on transfer Rwandan security at Kigali international airport yes- of Genocide suspects from ICTR and other jurisdic- terday. The New Times/John Mbanda tions,” said the spokesperson of the Rwandan Prose- cution, Alain Mukuralinda. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) yesterday transferred to Rwanda Genocide Munyagishari will be under police custody for a suspect Bernard Munyagishari from its custody in maximum of five days before being handed to Pro- Arusha, Tanzania. secution. Prosecution could request for 30 days from The former head of the genocidal party MRND in the judiciary to prepare his dossier as stipulated by former Gisenyi prefecture, was in pre-trial detention the law.
    [Show full text]
  • War Crimes Prosecution Watch, Vol. 15, Issue 8
    PILPG Logo Case School of Law Logo War Crimes Prosecution Watch Editor-in-Chief David Krawiec FREDERICK K. COX Volume 15 - Issue 8 INTERNATIONAL LAW CENTER June 6, 2020 Technical Editor-in-Chief Erica Hudson Founder/Advisor Michael P. Scharf Managing Editors Alexander Peters Faculty Advisor Matthew Casselberry Jim Johnson War Crimes Prosecution Watch is a bi-weekly e-newsletter that compiles official documents and articles from major news sources detailing and analyzing salient issues pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of war crimes throughout the world. To subscribe, please email [email protected] and type "subscribe" in the subject line. Opinions expressed in the articles herein represent the views of their authors and are not necessarily those of the War Crimes Prosecution Watch staff, the Case Western Reserve University School of Law or Public International Law & Policy Group. Contents AFRICA NORTH AFRICA Libya Libya's Defense Ministry: Shutdown of oil ports is a war crime (Libya Observer) Swiss company Kolmar taken to court for possible war crime of pillage through buying smuggled Libyan oil (Libya Herald) CENTRAL AFRICA Central African Republic Sudan & South Sudan Democratic Republic of the Congo UN Sees Possible War Crimes by Congo Militia With 296 Dead (Bloomberg News) Brutal killings in DRC's Ituri could be crimes against humanity – UN (RFI) WEST AFRICA Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Lake Chad Region — Chad, Nigeria, Niger, and Cameroon Mali Burkina Faso: Armed Islamists Attack Education (Human Rights Watch)
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda: an Untold Tropical Nazism
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Cross-examining the past Transitional justice, mass atrocity trials and history in Africa Bouwknegt, T.B. Publication date 2017 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bouwknegt, T. B. (2017). Cross-examining the past: Transitional justice, mass atrocity trials and history in Africa. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 4. Cross-examining the past. Rwanda: An Untold Tropical Nazism Witness statements are the building blocks upon which the prosecution directly bases its case. The testimony of witnesses at trial is the principal form of evidence that the Prosecutor places at the disposal of the Trial Chambers.973 You have asked me if there is such a thing as objective truth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diffusion of a Genocidal Norm in Rwanda Lee Ann Fujii Version of Record First Published: 25 May 2006
    This article was downloaded by: [United Nations] On: 19 April 2013, At: 07:32 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Genocide Research Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjgr20 Transforming the moral landscape: the diffusion of a genocidal norm in Rwanda Lee Ann Fujii Version of record first published: 25 May 2006. To cite this article: Lee Ann Fujii (2004): Transforming the moral landscape: the diffusion of a genocidal norm in Rwanda, Journal of Genocide Research, 6:1, 99-114 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1462352042000194737 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Journal of Genocide Research (2004), 6(1), March, 99–114 Transforming the moral landscape: the diffusion of a genocidal norm in Rwanda LEE ANN FUJII The Rwandan genocide presents a surfeit of troubling questions, not the least of which concerns the participatory nature of the crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Aloys Ndimbati, Ryandikayo and Phénéas Munyarugarama
    UNITED NATIONS International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals The International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (“Mechanism”) was established on 22 December 2010 by the United Nations Security Council to continue the jurisdiction, rights, obligations and essential functions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (“ICTR”) and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (“ICTY”) after the completion of their respective mandates. CASE INFORMATION SHEET At present, eight accused indicted by the ICTR for their participation in the genocide in Rwanda in 1994 remain at large. The Mechanism has jurisdiction over the following three accused: Augustin Bizimana, Félicien Kabuga and Protais Mpiranya. The remaining five cases have been referred to Rwandan authorities: Fulgence Kayishema, Charles Sikubwabo, Aloys Ndimbati, Ryandikayo and Phénéas Munyarugarama. Another fugitive whose case was referred to Rwanda, Ladislas Ntaganzwa, was arrested in Congo on 9 December 2015. MICT-12-14 FUGITIVE - ALOYS NDIMBATI Aloys Ndimbati was the Bourgmestre of Gisovu commune in the Kibuye préfecture, Rwanda, during the time of the crimes pleaded in the indictment Year and place of birth Early 1950s, Gisovu commune, Kibuye préfecture, Rwanda Indictment Operational indictment filed on 8 May 2012 Status of the Case At large since 28 November 1995 CASE BACKGROUND INFORMATION INDICTMENT Aloys Ndimbati was charged before ICTR with genocide, complicity in genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide and crimes against humanity, committed in Gisovu commune, Kibuye préfecture, in Rwanda during the period April-July 1994, when he was the Bourgmestre of the commune. According to the indictment, on or about 10 or 11 April 1994 at around 10:00, Ndimbati, using a megaphone, publicly called for the elimination of Tutsis.
    [Show full text]