DOCSLIB.ORG

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA: JUSTICE DELAYED 7 June 2001 Africa Report n°30 Nairobi/Arusha/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF RWANDA..................................................................................................................................................................... I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................................II I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................3 II. THE ICTR UNDER SCRUTINY: THE FORGOTTEN URGENCY OF ITS MANDATE........................................3 A. SOME SYMBOLIC RESULTS................................................................................................................3 1. Trials : Sending a Message Against Impunity...............................................................................3 2. The ICTR’s Achievements: Recognition of the Genocide and Political Neutralisation of “Hutu Power” ...........................................................................................................................................7 3. Cautious Determination to Prosecute Crimes Committed by the RPF and the Attack of 6 April 1994 ...............................................................................................................................................8 B. THE ICTR’S FAILURES: UNACCEPTABLE BUREAUCRATIC LOGJAMS ..................................10 1. The Heavy Responsibility of Judges ...........................................................................................10 2. Levels of Staff Competence at the Office of the Prosecutor.......................................................11 3. Internal Power Struggles..............................................................................................................12 4. Management of the Defence........................................................................................................12 III. THE ICTR AND STATES: LEGAL COOPERATION AND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY .................................13 A. ARRESTS: CONTINUED PROTECTION FOR CERTAIN CRIMINALS ..........................................14 1. The Democratic Republic of Congo - Protector of Military Fugitives........................................14 2. The Troublesome Kabuga in Kenya............................................................................................15 B. THE TRANSFER OF SUSPECTS - PROMPT ACTION AND LONG DELAYS ...............................17 C. AN AMERICAN INITIATIVE TO BE ENCOURAGED: FUNDS FOR INFORMERS ......................18 IV. THE ICTR AND RWANDA: THE INEVITABLE POLITICISATION OF JUSTICE............................................19 A. JUSTICE DEPENDANT UPON ACCESS TO THE CRIME SCENES................................................19 1. Relations Initially Marked by Defiance.......................................................................................19 2. The Barayagwiza Affair ..............................................................................................................20 3. The Difficult Task of Managing Witnesses.................................................................................22 B. A POLITICAL MANDATE DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE .....................................................................23 1. A Tribunal Isolated from Rwandan Society................................................................................23 2. The ICTR and Reconciliation......................................................................................................26 V. THE FUTURE OF THE ICTR: THE NEED FOR RESULTS....................................................................................28 A. ARRESTS: MAKING BETTER USE OF AVAILABLE INSTRUMENTS .........................................28 1. Using the Full Procedural Arsenal ..............................................................................................28 2. Giving the Prosecution More Autonomy.....................................................................................29 B. INCREASING ICTR'S PRESENCE AND INFORMATION IN RWANDA.........................................29 C. ORGANISING TRIALS OR HEARINGS IN KIGALI TO GIVE RWANDANS A NEW SENSE OF OWNERSHIP IN THE TRIALS ............................................................................................................30 D. CONFRONTING THE ISSUE OF COMPENSATION.........................................................................31 1. Forgotten Victims........................................................................................................................31 2. Victim Reparation vs. Victim Compensation..............................................................................32 E. THE DEBATE ON BROADENING THE MANDATE OF THE ICTR AND THE FIGHT AGAINST IMPUNITY ............................................................................................................................................34 F. BROADENING THE UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION OF NATIONAL COURTS: SHARING THE LOAD ....................................................................................................................................................35 CONCLUSION: ESTABLISH A TERM LIMIT ....................................................................................................................37 APPENDICES A. LIST OF ACRONYMS ..........................................................................................................................39 B. CHRONOLOGY OF ICTR ACTIVITIES..............................................................................................40 C. SITUATION OF ICTR PRISONERS 9 MAY 2000...............................................................................43 D. DEFENCE AND TRIAL COSTS...........................................................................................................51 E. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP.............................................................................54 F. ICG REPORTS AND BRIEFING PAPERS...........................................................................................55 G. ICG BOARD MEMBERS ......................................................................................................................59 ° ° ° ° ° 1° 00' 29 00' 29 30' 30 00' Kafunzo 30 30' 31 00' 1° 00' Merama RWANDA UGANDA Kagitumba International boundary Lake Mutanda Lake Rwemhasha Prefecture boundary Bunyonyi RWANDA Road Lubirizi Rutshuru Kisoro Track Nyagatare Cyanika Kabale K National capital a a BIRUNGA b ge m ra Butaro u Prefecture capital t NAT'L PARK Muvumba i Kidaho g KAGERA Town Lac Katuna a Lac Burera Mulindi K Ruhengeri Gatunda Rwanyakizinga 1° 30' Kirambo 1° 30' BYUMBA Ngarama Lac Cyamba Gabiro Kora Ruhondo Byumba Lac Mikindi DEMOCRATIC Busogo Mutura RUHENGERI NATIONAL Lake REPUBLIC OF THE Kagali Kinihira Lac Hago Mujunju Goma Nemba CONGO Gisenyi Kinyami Nyundo Muhura Lac Lo Kabaya Rushashi Rutare w Ngaru N Kivumba a Rukara GISENYI ya Mbogo Murambi PARK Lac ba Kivu Ngororero rongo Shyorongi Lac Lac Ihema Ile KIGALI Muhazi Bugarura Kiyumba Kinyinya Gikoro Kigali Rwamagana Ile Wahu Runda Bulinga Kayonza Lac 2° 00' Butamwa Kicukiro Bicumbi Nasho 2° 00' Mabanza Gitarama Kigarama Kibuye Lac Lake Lac Mpanga Bisongou Birambo Mugesera Lac Ile KIBUYE Bugesera Cyambwe Idjwi GITARAMA Kibungo Rukira Gishyita Bwakira Rilima Sake Rwamatamu Masango Ruhango KIBUNGO Gashora Rusumo Gatagara Bare Kaduha Nemba Kirehe K a GIKONGORO Ngenda ge Ile Rwesero Nyabisindu ra Gombo Karaba Lac Lac CYANGUGU Rusatira Cyohoha Rweru Kamembe Gisakura Gikongoro Sud Karama 2° 30' Bukavu Cyangugu Rwumba Kitabi 2° 30' Cyimbogo Karengera BUTARE UNITED Nyakabuye Bugumya Ruramba Butare BURUNDI REPUBLIC OF Gisagara u TANZANIA r a Bugarama Busoro y Munini n ka A Runyombyi 0 10 20 30 km The boundaries and names shown on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. 29° 00' 29° 30' 30° 00' 30° 30' 0 10 20 mi 31° 00' Map No. 3717 Rev. 7 UNITED NATIONS Department of Public Information December 1997 (Colour) Cartographic Section ICG Africa Report N° 30 7 June 2001 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA: JUSTICE DELAYED (Original Version in French) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Seven years after its establishment immediately them had managed by last March to attain a record following the genocide in Rwanda, and more than 28 months without hearing a substantial matter. four years since the beginning of the first trial, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda There are some points in the ICTR’s favour. It has (ICTR), based at Arusha, Tanzania, has to date provided indisputable recognition of the Rwandan handed down verdicts on only nine individuals. Of genocide and has politically neutralised the “Hutu 69 indicted suspects, 45 have been arrested. Not Power” movement’s agenda of Tutsi one of the alleged masterminds of the genocide has extermination. However, seven years on, it has still been brought to trial – including Colonel not been able to shed light on the design, Theoneste Bagosora who has been in prison for mechanisms, chronology, organisation and five years. Most of the masterminds of the financing of the genocide, nor has it answered the genocide, whether officially indicted by ICTR or key question: who committed the genocide? not (due to lack of evidence), are able to live freely Compared to the International
Recommended publications
  • Out of Africa

    Out of Africa

    Out of Africa Chris McGreal The Guardian, March 27, 2009 Chris McGreal began repor- the infection spread across Africa. ting from Africa at a time of pro- But running in parallel were the found change. He witnessed both worst of times. Weeks after watching the unbridled optimism of Nelson Mandela vote, I was standing at a Mandela’s release and the hor- church among thousands of corpses ri- rors of the Rwandan genocide. sing from the ground. It was about 3am Two decades later, in his final and I had just listened to a small group dispatch, he relives the moments of nuns in the Rwandan town of Kibuye that affected him most deeply, describe the massacre of thousands of and asks what the future holds for Tutsis in the Roman Catholic church. this great continent Eleven thousand died there in a single “”hey were the best of times in day. Another 10,000 were murdered in Africa, and the worst. They were the the football stadium the next. years when South Africa was swept The bodies were swiftly buried away by the belief that it was a na- around the church but rains washed tion blessed, a moral beacon to the the soil away, and everywhere the re- world, symbolised by a single moment mains of people frozen in futile de- as Nelson Mandela stood outside a fence against bullets and machetes small KwaZulu school in April 1994, were emerging from the soil. Women, dropped his vote into the ballot box children, old men - no one was spared, with a cross next to his own name, and not even the priest.
  • Updates from the International Criminal Courts Nicolas M

    Updates from the International Criminal Courts Nicolas M

    Human Rights Brief Volume 12 | Issue 2 Article 10 2005 Updates from the International Criminal Courts Nicolas M. Rouleau American University Washington College of Law Annelies Brock American University Washington College of Law Daisy Yu American University Washington College of Law Anne Heindel American University Washington College of Law Mario Cava American University Washington College of Law See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Rouleau, Nicolas M., Annelies Brock, Daisy Yu, Anne Heindel, Mario Cava, and Tejal Jesrani. "Updates from the International Criminal Courts." Human Rights Brief 12, no. 2 (2005): 33-38. This Column is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Rights Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Nicolas M. Rouleau, Annelies Brock, Daisy Yu, Anne Heindel, Mario Cava, and Tejal Jesrani This column is available in Human Rights Brief: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief/vol12/iss2/10 Rouleau et al.: Updates from the International Criminal Courts UPDATES FROM THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL When this requirement is met, the party argu- The Appeals Chamber then examined the FOR RWANDA ing that there has been a miscarriage of justice Prosecution’s contention that the Trial must further establish “that the error was criti- Chamber had committed an error of fact by GEORGES ANDERSON NDERUBUMWE cal to the verdict reached by the Trial failing to find a nexus between the crimes for RUTAGANDA V.
  • “The Law of Incitement” (PDF)

    “The Law of Incitement” (PDF)

    THE LAW OF INCITEMENT United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Symposium "Speech, Power and Violence" ∗ by Gregory S. Gordon I. INTRODUCTION This essay will explore the origins and development of the crime of direct and public incitement to commit genocide. It will begin with an historical analysis of the epochal Nuremberg decisions regarding Nazi hate-mongers Julius Streicher, Hans Fritzsche and Otto Dietrich. Although these decisions did not deal explicitly with incitement as a separate crime, they laid the groundwork for future development of incitement as a crime in its own right. The essay will then examine the official birth of the incitement crime with the adoption of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide ("Genocide Convention"). From that point through the next forty-five years, the crime was not actually applied. But that changed with the creation of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), which vigorously prosecuted incitement to genocide. Through a series of cases that progressively fleshed out elements of the crime, the ICTR jurisprudence set out the materials necessary to construct a legal framework necessary to analyze incitement. That framework was put to good use in the Canadian immigration context in the case of Rwandan politician Leon Mugesera, who delivered an infamous pre-1994 speech calling for genocide through a series of violent and macabre metaphors. The essay will conclude with an analysis of the most recent ICTR case to apply and develop the incitement framework -- Prosecutor v. Simon Bikindi. Bikindi, a popular songwriter, composed music and lyrics that provoked ethnic hatred toward Tutsis.
  • Rwandan Journalists Who Were Living in Uganda Went Back Home and Resumed Working

    Rwandan Journalists Who Were Living in Uganda Went Back Home and Resumed Working

    Because of this history, the media are no longer trusted by the public and government, and most people are suspicious of the journalism profession generally. Under the new government, a few journalists who had survived the genocide and other Rwandan journalists who were living in Uganda went back home and resumed working. RWANDA 268 MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2006–2007 INTRODUCTION OVERALL SCORE: 2.29 RWANDA Rwanda lost almost all its journalists during the 1994 genocide; they were among the roughly one million Tutsi and moderate Hutu Rwandans who were killed by extremist armed militia known by the name Interehemwa. The genocide came after the death of then-President Juvenile Habyarimana in a plane crash Rsuspected to have been caused by rebels hiding out in Uganda. During this genocide, which lasted for a period of about 100 days, the media stood accused of acting as a tool of hate. Some local radio stations and print media encouraged neighbors to turn against each other. Hutu extremists used the radio to mobilize the Hutu majority, coordinate killings, and try to ensure that the Tutsi were systematically eliminated. Rwandans are still bitter that it occurred with little intervention from Western governments, and it finally ended when the rebel group Rwanda Patriotic Front and the Ugandan Army wrested power away from the perpetrators and stopped the massacres. Some journalists who are believed to have actively participated in the genocide were investigated by international human-rights groups and were arrested and charged by the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Other journalists chose to go into exile.
  • THE CONTOURS of VIOLENCE: the Interaction Between Perpetrators

    THE CONTOURS of VIOLENCE: the Interaction Between Perpetrators

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ெVVZDPSVKLOOVIRUHVWVULYHUVDQG URDGVXVHGWRIXUWKHUWKHNLOOLQJRIWKH7XWVL8VLQJ*,6DQGSORWWLQJWKHPDVVDFUHVLWHV QHZSDWWHUQVHPHUJHGWKDWVKRZWKHPDVVDFUHVLWHVZHUHQRWUDQGRPEXWLQIDFWLQ VXFKSODFHVWKDWZRXOGIXQQHODQGGLUHFWYLFWLPPRYHPHQWWRZDUGVDUHDVRI5ZDQGD WKDWIDYRXUWKHNLOOHUV7KLVSRZHURYHUWHUULWRU\ZDVH[HUFLVHGRQWKHSDUWRIWKH SHUSHWUDWRUVWRPRUHHIILFLHQWO\LGHQWLI\FRQFHQWUDWHDQGH[WHUPLQDWHWKH7XWVL iv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v Table of Contents ,1752'8&7,21 0(7+2'2/2*< +,6725,2*5$3+< *,6
  • Press Clippings

    Press Clippings

    SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE Aerial view of Freetown business district PRESS CLIPPINGS Enclosed are clippings of local and international press on the Special Court and related issues obtained by the Outreach and Public Affairs Office as at: Thursday, 29 November 2012 Press clips are produced Monday through Friday. Any omission, comment or suggestion, please contact Martin Royston-Wright Ext 7217 2 Local News Charles Taylor May Be Freed / The Nation Page 3 International News Former Liberian President Taylor Should be a "Free Man" – Judge / Reuters Pages 4-5 UN Tribunal Acquits Kosovo Ex-PM of War Crimes / Agence France Presse Pages 6-8 ICTR Transfers Another Genocide Case to Rwanda / The New Times Pages 9-10 German Police 'Just Missed' Most Wanted Rwandan Genocide Suspect / Hirondelle News Agency Page 11 ICTY Upholds Serbian Nationalist Leader's Contempt of Court Sentence / RAPSI Page 12 3 The Nation Thursday, 29 November 2012 4 Reuters Tuesday, 27 November 2012 Former Liberian president Taylor should be a "free man" – judge By Sara Webb Former Liberian President Charles Taylor attends his trial at the Special Court for Sierra Leone based in Leidschendam, outside The Hague, May 16, 2012. REUTERS/Evert-Jan Daniels/Pool Justice Malick Sow's criticism of how the trial was conducted and of the final decision-making process are likely to be seized on by Taylor's defence lawyers as part of his appeal. Taylor, 64, was the first head of state convicted by an international court since the trials of Nazis after World War Two.
  • Rwamakuba Ictr-98-44C-T

    Rwamakuba Ictr-98-44C-T

    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES OR: ENG TRIAL CHAMBER III Before Judge: Dennis C. M. Byron, Presiding Karin Hökborg Gberdao Gustave Kam Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 20 September 2006 THE PROSECUTOR v. André RWAMAKUBA Case No. ICTR-98-44C-T JUDGEMENT Office of the Prosecutor: Defence Counsel Dior Fall David Hooper and Andreas O’Shea Iain Morley Adama Niane Tamara Cummings-John Judgement 20 September 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER I – CHARGES AGAINST THE ACCUSED...................................................................................................6 CHAPTER II - FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................13 I. RULES ON EVIDENTIARY MATTERS.................................................................................................................13 I.1. Presumption of Innocence......................................................................................................................................13 I.2. Chamber’s Discretionary power in the Appreciation of the Evidence ...........................................................14 II. FACTUAL FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................................14
  • ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Historica Upsaliensia 264

    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Historica Upsaliensia 264

    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Historica Upsaliensia 264 Utgivna av Historiska institutionen vid Uppsala universitet genom Margaret Hunt och Maria Ågren Cover Photo: Nyamata Church, Rwanda Photographer: Ben Curtis, Associated Press Cover Layout: Kerri Sandell Olov Simonsson God Rests in Rwanda The Role of Religion in the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Geijersalen, Thunbergsvägen 3P, Uppsala, Friday, 14 June 2019 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor R. Scott Appleby. Abstract Simonsson, O. 2019. God Rests in Rwanda. The Role of Religion in the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda. Studia Historica Upsaliensia 264. 312 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-513-0655-1. This study analyses the role of religion in the Rwandan genocide, providing new explanations to the complex dynamics of devaluation and victimisation processes in genocidal violence. The thesis explains how religion was used in different contexts prior to, during, and after the 1994 genocide. The following questions guide this study: What kinds of religious concepts and arguments were used in the context of the Rwandan genocide, and how? Why were they used and what did these concepts and arguments mean? Finally, did the meanings of the religious arguments change over time and between different contexts, and if so why? Texts from three sources were analysed: the Hutu extremist propaganda in Kangura magazine and in RTLM broadcasts, and testimonies from the ICTR trials. The analysis was guided by Roger Dale Petersen’s theory on Fear, Hatred, and Resentment, as well as theories on devaluation, social identity, self-victimisation, and competitive victimhood.
  • Amended Indictment Acte D'accusation Amende

    Amended Indictment Acte D'accusation Amende

    , INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA ...... ~ Case No. ICTR-96-9-I N de dossier:ICTR-96-9-I THE PROSECUTOR LE PROCUREUR DU TRIBUNAL AGAINST CONTRE LAD ISLAS NTAGANZWA LADISLAS NTAGANZWA AMENDED ACTE D'ACCUSATION INDICTMENT AMENDE The Prosecutor of the International Le Procureur du Tribunal Penal Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, pursuant to International pour Ie Rw"anda, en vertu des the authority stipulated in Atiicle 17 of the pouvoirs que lui confere I'article 17 elu Statute of the International Criminal Statut du Tribunal Penal International pour Tribunal for Rwanda ('the Statute of the Ie Rwanda ("Ie Statut du Tribunal") accuse: Tri b unal ') charges: LADISLAS NTAGANZWA LADISLAS NT AGANZW A with CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT eI'ENTENTE EN VUE DE GENOCIDE, GENOCIDE C9MMETTRE LE GENOCIDE, de COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE', GENOCIDE de COMPLICITE DE DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT GENOCIDE, d'INCITATION TO COMMIT GENOCIDE, CRIMES PUBLIQUE ET DIRECTE A AGAINST HUMANITY, and COMMETTRE LE GENOCIDE, de VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 3 CRIMES CONTRE L' HUMANITE, et ele COMMON TO THE GENEVA VIOLATIONS DE L'ARTICLE 3 CONVENTIONS AND ADDITIONAL COMMUN AUX CONVENTIONS DE PROTOCOL II, offences stipulated in GENtVE ET DU PROTOCOLE Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Statute of the ADDITIONNEL II, crimes prevus aux Tribunal. articles 2, 3 et 4 du Statut du Tribunal. " PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/198713/ 1. CONTEXTE HISTORIQUE 1. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1. CONTEXTE HISTORIQUE 1.1 The revolution of 1959 marked the 1.1 La revolution de 1959 marque Ie beginning ofa period of ethnic clashes debut d'une periode d'affrontements between the Hutu and the Tutsi in Rwanda, ethniques entre les Hutu et les Tutsi au causing hundreds of Tutsi to die and Rwanda, provoquant au cours des annees thousands more to flee the country in the qui ont immediatement suivi, des centaines years immediately following.
  • ICTR Newsletter

    ICTR Newsletter

    ICTRPublished by the Comm unicationNewsletter Cluster—ERSPS, Immediate Office of the Registrar United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda December 2010/January 2011 UN Establishes Residual Mechanism for Tribunals On 22 December 2010, the United Nations Security Council, acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations decided, through Resolution 1966 (2010), to establish a single International Residual Mechanism for the two ad-hoc Criminal Tribunals which shall continue the material, territorial, temporal and personal jurisdiction of both the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), respectively, as set out in their Statutes. While no decision has yet been The Security Council voted to adopt resolution 1966 (2010), which establishes the International Residual Mechanism for made as to the location of the Criminal Tribunals to finish the remaining tasks of the Tribunals Mechanism itself, it has however two for Rwanda and the Former Yugoslavia. branches, one branch for the ICTY (right) Rosemary A. DiCarlo, Deputy Permanent and one branch for the ICTR, Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations, chairs a Security Council meeting respectively. The branch of the ICTY ©UN Photo/Paulo Filgueiras shall have its seat in The Hague, The Netherlands. The branch for the The Arusha-based Mechanism shall review the progress of the work of ICTR shall have its seat in Arusha, commence functioning, on 1 July the Mechanism,
  • ORIGINAL: ENGLISH TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Erik Møse

    ORIGINAL: ENGLISH TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Erik Møse

    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda ORIGINAL: ENGLISH TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Erik Møse, presiding Judge Jai Ram Reddy Judge Sergei Alekseevich Egorov Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 18 December 2008 THE PROSECUTOR v. Théoneste BAGOSORA Gratien KABILIGI Aloys NTABAKUZE Anatole NSENGIYUMVA Case No. ICTR-98-41-T JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE Office of the Prosecutor: Counsel for the Defence: Barbara Mulvaney Raphaël Constant Christine Graham Allison Turner Kartik Murukutla Paul Skolnik Rashid Rashid Frédéric Hivon Gregory Townsend Peter Erlinder Drew White Kennedy Ogetto Gershom Otachi Bw’Omanwa The Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora et al., Case No. ICTR-98-41-T TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 1 1. Overview ................................................................................................................... 1 2. The Accused ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Théoneste Bagosora ................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Gratien Kabiligi ....................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Aloys Ntabakuze ...................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Anatole Nsengiyumva .............................................................................................
  • Samantha Richards Mphil Thesis

    Samantha Richards Mphil Thesis

    Lessons Learnt From Rwanda: The Need for Harmonisation of Penalties Between the ICC and its Member States Samantha Richards MPhil Thesis Student ID: 033365563 Submitted: 30 November 2014 Word count (excluding footnotes): 58,012 Abstract An examination of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its policy of complementarity in the context of the presumption, that for complementarity to be effective, the national courts will have to undertake the majority of the investigations and prosecutions of extraordinary crimes. This will then be discussed in terms of the current setup whereby national courts are permitted by Article 80 of the Rome Statute 1998, to apply their own penalties when conducting trials at the national level. The analysis serves to highlight that the current situation is not conducive to proportionate or consistent sentencing or penalties, as the death penalty may still be applied by national courts, whilst in accordance with human rights norms, the ICC only has custodial sentences available to its judges. In addition to this the discussion highlights that many national jurisdictions where the crimes take place are in need of capacity building so as to rebuild or to reinforce their legal systems to a level where they are able to seek justice for themselves. This leads into a discussion of the potential for outreach whereby the ICC may also be able to lead by example and take the opportunity to impart their sentencing objectives and procedural norms, in an attempt to facilitate consistent and proportionate justice at both the national and international level, so as to aid the fight to close the impunity gap.