Report of the Second United Nations Conference on the Exploration and Peaceful Uses of Outer Space

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of the Second United Nations Conference on the Exploration and Peaceful Uses of Outer Space A/CONF.101/10 REPORT OF THE SECOND UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON THE EXPLORATION AND PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE Vienna, 9-21 August 1982 UNITED NATIONS [Original: English] [31 August 1982] CONTENTS Paragraphs Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS • viii PART ONE: DECISIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONFERENCE ..... 1 7 438 1 INTRODUCTION 1 f 15 1 I. STATE OF SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 16 ~ 144 6 A. Space science 20-47 6 B. Experiments in space environment . 48-61 12 C. Telecommunications 62 - 77 15 D. Meteorology 78 - 90 20 E. Remote sensing 91 ~ i07 23 F. Navigation, global positioning and geodesy 108 * 126 27 G. Space transportation and space platform technologies . 127 - 144 30 II. APPLICATIONS OF SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 145 - 312 35 A. Current and potential applications of space technology 145 - 189 35 1. Telecommunications 146 - 153 35 2. Mobile communications 154 37 3. Land-mobile communications 155 - 156 37 4. Maritime communication 157 - 158 38 5. Aeronautical communication 159 39 6. Satellite-to-satellite links 160 39 7. Future communications applications 162 39 8. Satellite broadcasting 162 - 164 39 9. Remote sensing 165 - 174 40 10. Meteorology 175 -r 182 43 11. Navigation, global positioning and geodesy 183 - 188 45 12. Future applications 189 47 B. Choices and difficulties in the use of space technology 190 - 206 47 1. Choices 190 - 194 47 -iii- CONTENTS (continued) 2. Difficulties 195 - 206 48 C. Possibilities and mechanisms for enabling all States to benefit from1space technology 207 - 233 52 D. Facilitating access, use and development of space technology 234 - 246 59 E. Use of space technology for education 247 - 259 62 F. Compatibility and complementarity of satellite systems 260 - 276 66 1. Meteorology 261 - 264 66 2. Remote sensing 265 - 272 67 3. Communication 273 68 4. Navigation and other services 274 68 5. Over-all considerations 275 - 276 68 G. The geostationary satellite orbit 277 - 288 69 H. The nature and protection of the near-earth environment 289 - 300 71 I. Implications of projected developments in space technology 301 - 312 74 1. Space solar power systems 302 - 304 75 2. Space manufacturing • 305 - 307 75 3. Communications and remote sensing 308 - 309 76 4. Search for extra-terrestrial intelligence 310 76 5. Space settlements 311 76 6. Conclusion 312 76 III. INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION AND THE ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS 313 - 438 78 A. Multilateral co-operation 313 - 353 78 1. International Telecommunications Satellite Organization 314 - 319 78 2. Programme on International Co-operation in the Study and Peaceful Utilization of Outer Space (INTERCOSMOS programme) • 320 - 325 79 3. International system and Organization of Space Communications 326 - 329 80 4. European Space Agency 330 - 336 81 -iv- CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page 5. International Maritime Satellite Telecommunications Organization .................. 337- 343 82 6. Arab Satellite Communications Organization ....... 344 - 346 83 7. African Remote Sensing Council 347 - 348 83 8. European Telecommunications Satellite Organization 349 84 9. Other multilateral co-operation 350 - 353 84 B. Bilateral co-operation 354 - 359 8 5 C. An assessment of multilateral and bilateral co-operation 360 - 368 87 D. Co-operation between developing countries 369 - 380 89 E. The role of the United Nations system: a review 381 - 421 92 1. Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space .... 382 - 384 92 2. Outer Space Affairs Division 385-387 93 3. Office of Legal Affairs 388 94 4. Natural Resources and Energy Division 389 - 390 94 5. Regional commissions 391 - 395 95 6. Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator 396-397 95 7. United Nations Environment Programme ............. 398 - 400 96 8. United Nations Development Programme 401 96 9. International Telecommunication Union 402 - 405 96 10. world Meteorological Organization 406 - 408 98 11. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations 409 - 411 98 12. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 412 - 413 99 13. International Maritime Organization 414 100 14. International Civil Aviation Organization 415 - 417 100 15. World Bank 418 101 16. Other agencies 419 101 17. Co-operation and co-ordination 420 - 421 101 F. The role of the United Nations: an assessment and recommendations 422 - 438 102 -v- CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page PART TWO; PROCEEDINGS OP THE CONFERENCE 439 - 657 107 I. ORIGINS OP THE SECOND UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON THE EXPLORATION AND PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE 439-454 107 II. ATTENDANCE AND ORGANIZATION OF WORK 455 - 500 111 A. Date and place of the Conference 455 111 B. Pre-Conference consultations 456 111 C. Attendance 457 - 465 111 D. Opening of the Conference and election of its President 466-491 113 E. Adoption of the rules of procedure 492 118 F. Adoption of the agenda 493 118 G. Establishment of the Main Committees and organization of work 494 120 H. Election of officers other than the President 495 - 498 120 I. Appointment of the members of the Credentials Committee 499 121 J. Implications of Conference decisions for the programme budget of the United Nations 500 121 III. SUMMARY OF THE GENERAL DEBATE 501 - 533 122 IV. REPORTS OF SUBSIDIARY BODIES AND ACTION TAKEN ON THESE REPORTS BY THE CONFERENCE 534 - 578 129 A. Report of the First Committee 534 - 543 129 B. Report of the Second Committee 544 - 553 130 C. Report of the Third Committee 554-565 131 D. Report of the Credentials Committee 566 - 578 133 V. ADOPTION OF THE REPORT OF THE CONFERENCE 579 - 585 136 VI. CONCLUDING STATEMENTS 586 - 604 137 A. Statement by the Secretary-General of the Conference 586-594 137 B. Statement by the President of the Conference 595 - 604 138 -vi- CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page VII. RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE . 605 141 VIII. ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONFERENCE 606 - 657 142 A. Demonstrations of space applications 609 - 638 142 B. Technical presentations and poster session 639 - 641 146 C. Evening lectures 642 - 644 148 D. Background papers 645 148 E. Regional and inter-regional seminars 646 148 F. Other seminars and meetings 647 148 G. Essay and poster contests 648 149 H. Other public awareness activities 649 - 650 149 I. Exhibitions 651 - 653 149 J. COSPAR/IAF Forum 654 - 655 150 K. Activities of the non-governmental organizations .... 656 - 657 150 Annexes I. MESSAGES FROM HEADS OF STATE OR GOVERNMENT 153, II. LIST OF DOCUMENTS 162 -vii- ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACC Administrative Committee on Co-ordination (United Nations) AFROSAT African regional communications satellite APT automatic picture transmission ARABSAT Arab Satellite Communications Organization ARSC African Remote Sensing Council ASEAN Association of South-East Asian Nations BSS Broadcasting Satellite Service CCIR International Radio Consultative Committee (ITU) CCITT International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee (ITU) CCT computer compatible tape CFC chlorofluorocarbon CNES Centre national d'etudes spatiales (France) COPUOS Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (United Nations) COSPAR Committee on Space Research (ICSU) DBS direct broadcast satellite DCP data collection platform ECS European Communications Satellite EIRP equivalent isotropically radiated power ELDO European Space Vehicle Launcher Development Organization ESA European Space Agency ESRO European Space Research Organization EUTELSAT European Telecommunications Satellite Organization FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FES fluid experiment system (SPACELAB) FGGE First GARP Global Experiment (WMO) FPM fluid physics module (SPACELAB) GARP Global Atmospheric Research Programme GEMS Global Environment Monitoring System GPS Global Positioning System GSO geostationary orbit HDDT high density digital tape IAF International Astronautical Federation ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ICSU International Council of Scientific Unions IFRB International Frequency Registration Board (ITU) IGCP International Geological Correlation Programme -viii- IGOSS Integrated Global Ocean Services System IHP International Hydrological Programme (WMO) IMO International Maritime Organization IPDC International Programme for the Development of Communication INMARSAT International Maritime Satellite Telecommunications Organization INTELSAT International Telecommunications Satellite Organization INTERCOSMOS Programme on International Co-operation in the Study and Peaceful Utilization of Outer Space INTERSPUTNIK International System and Organization of Space Communications IOC Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (UNESCO) ITU International Telecommunication Union MAB Man and the Biosphere MONEX Monsoon Experiment (WMO) NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration (United States) NNSS Navy Navigation Satellite System (United States) NPS nuclear power source RF radio frequency SARSAT search and rescue satellite aided tracking SETI search for extraterrestrial intelligence SITE Satellite Instructional Television Experiment (India) SPS solar power satellite SSTO single stage to orbit UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNDRO Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization VLBI very long baseline interferometry WARC World Administrative Radio Conference WEFAX weather facsimile WMO World Meteorological Organization WWW World Weather Watch (WMO-ICSU) -ix- PART ONE DECISIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONFERENCE INTRODUCTION
Recommended publications
  • I Technical Memorandum 80704
    NASA-TM-80704 19800019413 N/ A i TechnicalMemorandum 80704 Meteorological Satellites- LIBRAR, YcOPY- ._, : 3'JMm ..... HAMPVATON, L. J. Allison (Editor), A. Schnapf, B. C. Diesen, III, P. S. Martin, A. Schwalb, and W. R. Bandeen JUNE 1980 NationalAeronauticsand S0aceAdministration GoddardSpace FlightCenter Greenbelt.Maryland20771 METEOROLOGICALSATELLITES LewisJ. Allison (Editor) Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland Contributing Authors: Abraham Schnapf, Bernard C. Diesen, III, Philip S. Martin, Arthur Schwalb, and WilliamR. Bandeen ABSTRACT This paper presents an overviewof the meteorologicalsatellite programs that havebeen evolvingfrom 1958 to the present and reviews plans for the future meteorological and environmental satellite systems that are scheduled to be placed into servicein the early 1980's. The development of the TIROS family of weather satellites, including TIROS, ESSA, ITOS/NOAA,and the present TIROS-N (the third-generation operational system) is summarized. The contribution of the Nimbus and ATS technology satellites to the development of the operational polar- orbiting and geostationary satellites is discussed. Included are descriptions of both the TIROS-N and the DMSPpayloadscurrently under developmentto assurea continued and orderly growth of these systemsinto the 1980's. iii CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................... iii EVOLUTION OF THE U.S. METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE PROGRAMS ....... 1 TIROS ............................................... 1 ESSA ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Facts and Figures 1979/80 Lunar Landing 1969-1979
    Aerospace Facts and Figures 1979/80 Lunar Landing 1969-1979 This 27th annual edition of Aero­ space Facts and Figures commem­ orates the 1Oth anniversary of man's initial landing on the moon, which occurred on July 20, 1969 during the Apollo 11 mission. Neil Armstrong and Edwin E. Aldrin were the first moonwalkers and their Apollo 11 teammate was Com­ mand Module Pilot Michael Collins. Shown above is NASA's 1Oth anni­ versary commemorative logo; created by artist Paull Calle, it de­ picts astronaut Armstrong pre­ paring to don his helmet prior to the historic Apollo 11 launch. On the Cover: James J. Fi sher's cover art symboli zes th e Earth/ moon relationship and man's efforts to expl ore Earth 's ancien t sa tellite. Aerospace Facts and Figures m;ji8Q Aerospace Facts and Figures 1979/80 AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Published by Aviation Week & Space Technology A MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10020 (212) 997-3289 $6.95 Per Copy Copyright, July 1979 by Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1725 De Sales Street, N. W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 347-2315 Director Allen H. Skaggs Chief Statistician Sally H. Bath Acknowledgments Air Transport Association Civil Aeronautics Board Export-Import Bank of the United States Federal Trade Commission General Aviation Manufacturers Association International Air Transport Association International Civil Aviation Organization National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation U.
    [Show full text]
  • China Dream, Space Dream: China's Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States
    China Dream, Space Dream 中国梦,航天梦China’s Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States A report prepared for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Kevin Pollpeter Eric Anderson Jordan Wilson Fan Yang Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Patrick Besha and Dr. Scott Pace for reviewing a previous draft of this report. They would also like to thank Lynne Bush and Bret Silvis for their master editing skills. Of course, any errors or omissions are the fault of authors. Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. CONTENTS Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Astronomia Nova
    Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Expressions for Determining Temperatures and Emission Measures from GOES Soft X–Ray Measurements
    Updated Expressions for Determining Temperatures and Emission Measures from GOES Soft X{ray Measurements Stephen M. White Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA Roger J. Thomas and Richard A. Schwartz Code 682, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA February 9, 2005 Abstract. We investigate the conversion of the 0.5{4 and 1{8 A˚ soft X{ray flux measurements made by detectors on the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) into temperature and emission measures of coronal plasma using modern spectral models and modern understanding of coronal abundances. In particular, the original analysis by Thomas, Starr & Crannell (1985) is updated to take into account the realization that coronal abundances may be quite different from photospheric abundances. An important result of this analysis is that the derived temperatures and emission measures depend strongly on the assumed abundances even at high temperatures where continuum rather than spectral lines dominates the Sun's X{ray spectrum. This occurs because the higher coronal abundances mean that most of the continuum is due to free{bound emission processes, not free{free emission, and thus is abundance{dependent. We find significant differences between modern calculations of the temperature response of the flux measurements and the versions currently in use: for a typical flare, emission measures may be up to a factor of 4 smaller than the current software suggests. Derived temperatures are similar for both photospheric and coronal abundances for cool flares (e.g., 15 MK), but for hot flares (e.g., 35 MK) coronal abundances can lead to significantly (∼ 25%) lower temperatures being derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Artificial Satellites Launched in 1978
    This electronic version (PDF) was scanned by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Library & Archives Service from an original paper document in the ITU Library & Archives collections. La présente version électronique (PDF) a été numérisée par le Service de la bibliothèque et des archives de l'Union internationale des télécommunications (UIT) à partir d'un document papier original des collections de ce service. Esta versión electrónica (PDF) ha sido escaneada por el Servicio de Biblioteca y Archivos de la Unión Internacional de Telecomunicaciones (UIT) a partir de un documento impreso original de las colecciones del Servicio de Biblioteca y Archivos de la UIT. (ITU) ﻟﻼﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻻﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻧﺘﺎﺝ (PDF) ﺍﻹﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ .ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﺎﺋﻖ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﻼ ً◌ 此电子版(PDF版本)由国际电信联盟(ITU)图书馆和档案室利用存于该处的纸质文件扫描提供。 Настоящий электронный вариант (PDF) был подготовлен в библиотечно-архивной службе Международного союза электросвязи путем сканирования исходного документа в бумажной форме из библиотечно-архивной службы МСЭ. © International Telecommunication Union Table of artificial satellites launched in 1978 COSMOS-1 012 1978 54A C0SM0S-1064 1978 119A MOLNYA-1 (40 ) 1978 55A A C0SM0S-1013 1978 56A C0SM0S-1065 1978 120A MOLNYA-1 (41) 1978 72 A COSMOS-1066 1 21A MOLNYA-1 (42) 1978 80A AMSAT-OSCAR-8 1978 26B C0SM0S-1014 1978 56B 1978 MOLNYA-3 (9) 1 978 9A ANIK-B1 1978 116A C0SM0S-1015 1978 56 C COSMOS-1067 1978 122A C0SM0S-1016 1978 56D COSMOS-1 068 1978
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Is Not Archiving All Potentially Valuable Data
    ‘“L, United States General Acchunting Office \ Report to the Chairman, Committee on Science, Space and Technology, House of Representatives November 1990 SPACE OPERATIONS NASA Is Not Archiving All Potentially Valuable Data GAO/IMTEC-91-3 Information Management and Technology Division B-240427 November 2,199O The Honorable Robert A. Roe Chairman, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: On March 2, 1990, we reported on how well the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) managed, stored, and archived space science data from past missions. This present report, as agreed with your office, discusses other data management issues, including (1) whether NASA is archiving its most valuable data, and (2) the extent to which a mechanism exists for obtaining input from the scientific community on what types of space science data should be archived. As arranged with your office, unless you publicly announce the contents of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution until 30 days from the date of this letter. We will then give copies to appropriate congressional committees, the Administrator of NASA, and other interested parties upon request. This work was performed under the direction of Samuel W. Howlin, Director for Defense and Security Information Systems, who can be reached at (202) 275-4649. Other major contributors are listed in appendix IX. Sincerely yours, Ralph V. Carlone Assistant Comptroller General Executive Summary The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is respon- Purpose sible for space exploration and for managing, archiving, and dissemi- nating space science data. Since 1958, NASA has spent billions on its space science programs and successfully launched over 260 scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • GOES X-Ray Sensor (XRS)
    GOES X-ray Sensor (XRS) Measurements Janet Machol, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) and University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science (CIRES) Rodney Viereck, NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) 10 June 2016, Version 1.4.1 Important notes for users Scaling factors: For GOES 8-15, the archived fluxes have had SWPC scaling factors applied. To get true fluxes, these factors must be removed. To get true fluxes from the archived data, users must divide short channel fluxes by 0.85 and divide the long channel fluxes by 0.7. Similarly, to get true fluxes for pre-GOES-8 data, users should divide the archived fluxes by the scale factors. No adjustments are needed to use the GOES 8-15 fluxes to get the traditional C, M, and X alert levels. (See Section 2.) Time stamps: The raw data time stamps are offset 1.024 s after the integration periods. The timestamps for averaged data have a 1-3 s offset from the start of the data. (See Section 3.) Version Date Description of major changes author 1.4.1 9 June 2016 3 s data for GOES 8-12 added to archive. Revised table of Machol chronology of primary and secondary satellites. Added references and discussion of digitization. 1.4 4 March 2015 original Machol Contents 1. GOES X-ray Sensor (XRS) ........................................................................................................................... 3 2. Data issues ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchronous Objects
    esoc European Space Operations Centre Robert-Bosch-Strasse 5 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany T +49 (0)6151 900 F +49 (0)6151 90495 www.esa.int CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS Produced with the DISCOS Database Prepared by T. Flohrer Reference GEN-DB-LOG-00086-OPS-GR Issue 14 Revision 1 Date of Issue 17 February 2012 Status Issued Document Type TN Distribution open European Space Agency Agence spatiale européenne Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of the end of 2011. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring (here defined as orbits with mean motion between 0.9 and 1.1 revolutions per day, eccentricity smaller than 0.2 and inclination below 70 deg) is analysed. From 1234 objects for which orbital data are available, 406 are controlled inside their longitude slots, 629 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 172 are in a libration orbit and 18 whose status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 74 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 66 have not been cata- logued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1307 . During 2011 at least sixteen spacecraft reached end-of-life. Thirteen of them were reorbited following the IADC recommendations, one of those below the GEO protected region. Three spacecraft were reorbited too low. We identified one spacecraft that seems to be abandoned or could not make any reorbiting manouevre at all in 2009 and is now librating inside the geostationary ring.
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIFICATION of GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS ISSUE 13 Produced with the DISCOS Database
    EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY EUROPEAN SPACE OPERATIONS CENTRE GROUND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Space Debris Office GEN-DB-LOG-00074-OPS-GR CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS ISSUE 13 by T. Flohrer, R. Choc, and B. Bastida Produced with the DISCOS Database February 2011 ESOC Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany 3 Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of the end of 2010. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring (here defined as orbits with mean motion between 0.9 and 1.1 revolutions per day, eccentricity smaller than 0.2 and inclination below 30 deg) is analysed. From 1202 objects for which orbital data are available, 397 are controlled inside their longitude slots, 622 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 172 are in a libration orbit and 11 whose status could not be determined. Fur- thermore, there are 72 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 66 have not been catalogued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1274. During 2010 at least sixteen spacecraft reached end-of-life. Eleven of them were reorbited following the IADC recommendations, of which one spacecraft was reorbited with a perigee of 241 km - it is not yet clear if it will enter the 200-km protected zone around GEO or not -, four spacecraft were reorbited too low and at least one spacecraft did not or could not make any reorbiting manouevre at all and is now librating inside the geostationary ring.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Solar System
    German Aerospace Center Institute of Planetary Research OUR SOLAR SYSTEM A Short Introduction to the Bodies of our Solar System and their Exploration Prepared by Susanne Pieth and Ulrich Köhler Regional Planetary Image Facility Director: Prof. Dr. Ralf Jaumann Data Manager: Susanne Pieth 2013, 3rd and enhanced edition CONTENT 3 Preface 5 Exploring the Solar System with space probes 10 Comparative planetology in the Solar System 14 Sun 17 Mercury 21 Venus 25 Earth-Moon system 37 Mars 42 Asteroids 48 Jupiter 53 Saturn 60 Uranus 64 Neptune 68 Comets 72 Dwarf planets 76 Kuiper belt 79 Planetary evolution and life Addendum 84 Overview about the missions in the Solar System 97 How can I order image data? These texts were written with the help of Dr. Manfred Gaida, Prof. Dr. Alan Harris, Ernst Hauber, Dr. Jörn Helbert, Prof. Dr. Harald Hiesinger, Dr. Hauke Hußmann, Prof. Dr. Ralf Jaumann, Dr. Ekkehard Kührt, Dr. René Laufer, Dr. Stefano Mottola, Prof. Dr. Jürgen Oberst, Dr. Frank Sohl, Prof. Dr. Tilman Spohn, Dr. Katrin Stephan, Dr. Daniela Tirsch, and Dr. Roland Wagner. Preface PREfacE A journey through the Solar System ‘Blue Planet‘ is fragile and needs to be protected, and that it is the best of all imaginable spaceships. The year 2009 was proclaimed the International Year of Astrono- my to commemorate a defining moment in history. It was exactly In fact, however, every riddle that is solved raises fresh questions. 400 years before that Galileo Galilei had turned his telescope to How did life originate on Earth? Did it come from another celestial the sky for the first time – and what he discovered was truly revo- body, and would life on Earth be possible at all without the Moon‘s lutionary.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA, the First 25 Years: 1958-83. a Resource for the Book
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 252 377 SE 045 294 AUTHOR Thorne, Muriel M., Ed. TITLE NASA, The First 25 Years: 1958-83. A Resource for Teachers. A Curriculum Project. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. REPORT NO EP-182 PUB DATE 83 NOTE 132p.; Some colored photographs may not reproduce clearly. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Reference Materials - General (130) Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Education; *Aerospace Technology; Energy; *Federal Programs; International Programs; Satellites (Aerospace); Science History; Secondary Education; *Secondary School Science; *Space Exploration; *Space Sciences IDENTIFIERS *National Aeronautics and Space Administration ABSTRACT This book is designed to serve as a reference base from which teachers can develop classroom concepts and activities related to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The book consists of a prologue, ten chapters, an epilogue, and two appendices. The prologue contains a brief survey of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, NASA's predecessor. The first chapter introduces NASA--the agency, its physical plant, and its mission. Succeeding chapters are devoted to these NASA program areas: aeronautics; applications satellites; energy research; international programs; launch vehicles; space flight; technology utilization; and data systems. Major NASA projects are listed chronologically within each of these program areas. Each chapter concludes with ideas for the classroom. The epilogue offers some perspectives on NASA's first 25 years and a glimpse of the future. Appendices include a record of NASA launches and a list of the NASA educational service offices.
    [Show full text]