DOCSLIB.ORG

Statewide Map.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statewide Map.Pdf Aztec Farmington Raton Existing Texas Transportation System Newkirk Tierra Amarilla Buffalo Medford Beaver Alva Bartlesville Cherokee Nowata Boise City Ponca City Pawhuska Texas SGuymtonatewide Long-Range Transportation Plan 2035 Salem Eureka Springs Mountain Home Taos Jay Berryville Clayton Bentonville ¤£54 Rogers Woodward Yellville Perryton Harrison 136 Pawnee Claremore Pryor Stratford ¬« 192 385 ¬« Owasso ¤£ Perry Melbourne Dallam Fairview Sherman Hansford ¬«15 Ochiltree ¬«23 Lipscomb Lipscomb Huntsville Spearman Sand Springs 287 ¬«207 305 Fayetteville Jasper 102 ¤£ £83 ¬« ¬«213 Arnett Stillwater ¬« ¤ Marshall Dalhart Mountain View Mora 51 ¬« Taloga Wagoner Los Alamos ¬«207 ¨¦§35 Tahlequah ¨¦§540 Stilwell Canadian Guthrie Dumas Kingfisher Watonga Mosquero Hartley ¤£87 152 Moore ¬« Hutchinson Roberts Hemphill Amarillo ¬«33 Clinton Chandler Heber Springs Las Vegas Channing Miami 44 ¬«354 Borger Edmond ¨¦§ Okmulgee Cheyenne Ozark Clarksville Arapaho 152 Sallisaw ¬« Pampa 60 Weatherford El Reno Bethany ¬«233 ¤£ Yukon Fort Smith 25 ¬«171 ¬«152 ¨¦§40 Oklahoma City Okemah § 398 Wheeler Midwest City Russellville ¨¦ Paris Charleston Oldham ¬« Potter Carson Dardanel4le 0 Gray Wheeler Moore ¨¦§ Grants Panhandle Stigler Greenwood 434 Sayre ¬« 273 Booneville Albuquerque Vega ¬« Tucumcari Amarillo 83 279 ¤£ ¬«30 Wewoka Perryville ¬« 136 40 271 ¬«o¬«228 ¨¦§ ¬«70 ¬« Poteau Claude O K L A H O M A Holdenville ¬«335 Jacksonville 40 207 § Santa Rosa ¬«70 Waldron Sherwood Lonoke ¨¦ Purcell 214 ¬« Wilburton ¬« Deaf Smith ¬«48 217 Randall ¬« Armstrong ClarendDononley Collingsworth Estancia 203 ¬« ¬«204 ¬«203 Mangum 211 ¤£87 Wellington A R K A N S A S «¬ Ada Benton 60 Pauls Valley ¤£ Mena Mount Ida Hollis Hot Springs 287 ¬«256 £ Lawton ¤£385 ¤ Tulia Malvern Fort Sumner Parmer Castro Sulphur Swisher Briscoe ¬«86 Childress Duncan Silverton Glenwood 256 Hall Pine Bluff Clovis 214 ¬« 328 Childress Meridian Atoka Farwell ¬« ¤£87 ¬« 30 ¬«86 ¨¦§ ¬«403 ¬«194 ¨¦§2¬«2792 Springer Quanah Antlers Arkadelphia Muleshoe Childress 283 Healdton I Socorro £ n Hardeman ¤ d i Dickson a Murfreesboro n Lone Grove N 207 a Star City t Rison i Waurika o 70 ¬« n De Queen Ardmore ¤£ Vernon T o l l 488 R 145 o a ¬«75 ¬« ¬« Burkburnett d Bailey ¬«70 Hugo Lamb Hale Floyd Motley Durant Cottle Wilbarger ElectraWichita 267 Fordyce Matador ¬« Idabel Floydada Paducah Crowell 44 ¬«79 70 ¨¦§325 Ben Lomond Prescott Littlefield Foard ¤£ 183 ¬« ¤£ Wichita Falols 148 42 ¬« N E W M E X I C O 385 ¬« 473 47 ¬« ¬« ¬« Henrietta 271 25 369 Lake 19 Nocona Caddo 37 § ¬« National Gra ssl ands ¤£ ¬« Ashdown Hope ¨¦ ¬« Pottsboro Carrizozo ¤£83 25 Denison Morton Kemp ¬« Paris Hampton Clay ¬«175 ¬«91 Lamar Detroit 461 62 Grayson Clarksville ¬« ¤£ Montague Cooke Gainesville 121 Lubbock Crosbyton Wichita Falls Montague 129 ¬« Lubbock Baylor ¬« Sherman ¬«56 Bonham Cochran 125 125 Lubbock Crosby 391 ¬«56 Red River De Kalb ¬«¬« Hockley Ree se A ir Force Ba se o Dickens GuthrieKing Knox Archer City ¬« Levelland Benjamin Seymour Leary 114 Archer Bowie Lake 11 Hooks Texarkana 309 «¬ ¬« Fannin Paris Bogata New Boston ¬« ¬«59 Ray 381 Lewisville 331 148 160 Caddo o ¬«6 ¬« o ¬« Spur ¬« ¬« National Gra ssl ands ¬«37 BowRieedwater Roswell 35 Roberts Delta ¨¦§ 121 ¬«98 Maud 493 207 222 ¬«79 187 Pilot Point ¬«5 Cooper ¬«96 ¬« ¬« ¬« ¬« 101 Lyndon B . J ohnson ¬« Olney ¬« National Gra ssl and ¬«50 ¬«45 Denton 75 ¬«24 132 ¤£ Commerce Franklin Titus Naples Douglassville 208 ¬« ¬«16 Mount Vernon Mariet¬«t7a7 Queen City ¬« Jayton Jack Lake Decatur 289 McKinney Hunt Hopkins Omaha ¬«8 Bloomburg 380 Haskell Denton ¬« Collin Mount Pleasant Atlanta Bradley ¤£ Young Jacksboro Bridgeport Bridgeport Greenville 423 185 Cass Yoakum 82 137 Post Throckmorton Wise ¬«5 Sulphur Springs ¬« ¬« Morris ¤£ Terry ¬« Lynn Garza Kent Haskell Lake 3067 ¬«11 StonewalAl spermont128 Lewisville Allen ¨¦§¤£ Daingerfield 77 ¬« Throckmorton 78 271 Hughes Springs Linden ¬« Graham 114 Lewisville ¬« ¤£ 283 «¬ Rhome Plano Pittsburg Alamogordo ¬« Lake Camp 377 19 Lone Star Fort Worth ¤£ Coppell Ray ¬« Avinger Farmerville Lovington 214 533 Springtown CarrolRltiocnhardson Rockwall 154 Vivian ¬« ¬« Keller DALLAS/ GarlHaunbdbard 34 ¬« ¬«37 ¬«83 ¬«76 FORT WORTH 276 ¬« 276 Emory 155 Stamford Fort ¬« Artesia 208 INTERNATIONAL 635 ¬« Rains Marion ¬« ¬«67 337 Wol te rs ¬« Ore City Caddo 49 283 ¬« Watauga AIRPORT 12 244 264 Quitman Upshur Jefferson ¬« ¬«92Hamlin Fort Worth ¨¦§¬« ¬« ¤£ ¬« Rockwall Lake Hursot Irving Rotan 182 214 Parker 820 ¬«97 Mesquite ¬« Gilmer Uncertain Weatherford 183 Grand oPrairie Balch Terrell Wood Benton ¬« Forney Mineral ¬« Gail Palo Pinto Cars well §Arlington 345 352 Dallas Minden ¨¦ AFB Wills Point Anson Breckenridge Palo Pinto Wells 199 ¬« Springs Grand Saline 449 West Monroe Gaines Seminole Dawson Shackelford ¬«16 ¨¦§ 205 Mineola ¬« Hobbs Borden Scurry Roby 312 White ¬« 155 Atlanta Monroe 180 Albany BenbrookForest Hill 360 ¬« 300 20 Ruston 180 Fisher Jones ¤£ Stephens ¬« Settlement ¬« o ¬« Nesbitt Crandall 69 ¬« ¨¦§ £ Duncanville £ ¤ 465 35 Kaufman ¤ Harrison 154 Scottsville 220 ¬« ¨¦§Lancaster Gladewater Hallsville ¬« 35Tarrant Cedar HDeil lSoto Dallas Kaufman 281 Marshall Waskom ¨§ 183 Mansfield Canton ¦ Abilene ¤£ ¨¦§ ¬«243 Van Lindale ¬«Longview Shreveport Burleson 342 110 155 208 351 193 ¬« Dallas Van Zandt «¬ ¬« Gregg ¬« ¬« 6 ¬« Lakeport Carlsbad ¬« 281 174 73 561 ¬«64 Smith Winona Kilgore 350 Sweetwater MerkelAbilene 112 ¤£ Granbury ¬« ¬« ¬« Easton ¬« Roscoe ¬«70 «¬Ranger254 Tyler Jonesboro ¬« 171 Keene 198 Tatum Stonewall Dye ss A ir Force Ba se Eastland 16 Waxahachie o322 10 322 Baird Cisco ¬« ¬« ¬« ¬«31 259 ¨¦§ ¬« Hood 248 ¤£ ¬« 79 490 Cleburne Ennis o ¬« Overton Beckville ¤£ Columbia o 20 108 Ellis Lake ¬«57 New London ¬« Johnson 274 Andrews Martin 176 ¨¦§ ¬« ¬« Palestine 135 L O U I S I A N A 115 ¬« Howard Mitchell Nolan Taylor Callahan Eastland ¬« ¬«42 «¬ Erath Glen Rose Rusk Carthage ¬«34 Bullard Henderson ¬«70 Stephenville Somervell Athens Troup Panola Kerens Henderson ¬«60 Mansfield ¬«6 Corsicana Richland- Tyler 315 Gary ¬«6 128 163 DeLeon ¬«81 135 110 ¬« ¬« ¬« North 22 Chambers ¬««¬ JoaqLuoingansport 155 206 35 ¬« Navarro Tenaha ¤£54 ¬« 220 ¨¦§ Reservoir ¬« Fort Bl iss 158 ¬« 144 Hillsboro ¬«19 Jacksonville 178 Fort Bl iss ¬« Midland 137 277 ¬« 456 Timpson ¬« ¬« ¤£ 294 ¬« 259 49 Willia m Be aumont Army Hospital El Paso Hill 142 ¤£ Hico Whitney ¬« § 208 Huxley ¨¦ El Paso 40 349 Winters Comanche Meridian ¬« 375 385 ¬« ¬« ¬« 204 Garrison Center Jena Kermit ¤£ Comanche 263 262 Cherokee 11o0 ¬« o 158 36 ¬« ¬« Anderson ¬« Shelby Loving Winkler Garden City ¬« 324 Rusk ¨¦§ 62 Ector Odessa Glasscock ¬« CokReobert E. Lee 279 Bosque ¬«Palestine ¤£ Sterling City Coleman ¬« 130 Socorro Midland Runnels ¬« ¬«19 302 Sterling ¬«16 Clifton Fairfield NacogdocheAsppleby Toledo ¬« Coleman Brown 442 Mentone 67 ¬« Alto ¬«20 115 ¤£ Hamilton 147 Bend Many «¬ Ballinger Mexia 113 Freestone 224 ¬« Colfax 20 «¬ ¬«294 294 ¬«21 ¬« Reservoir ¨¦§ Brownwood Waco Teague ¬« Nacogdoches San Augustine Hamilton McLennan 21 Monahans 179 287 Chireno ¬« §10 ¬«36 Waco Limestone ¬« ¤£ Wells ¨¦ Mart 247 West 412 Groesbeck San Augustine ¬«35 57 o Pineville ¬« ¬« Grapeland Hudspeth ¬« 340 Culberson Ward ¤£87 Paint Rock ¬«6 Alexandria ¬« Buffalo 103 ¬«54 Odessa Mills Gatesville 103 ¬«36Lufkin ¬« Sabine San Angelo 283 377 Goldthwaite £79 ¬«Hudson Crane Goodfe llow AFB ¤£ ¤£ ¤ Broaddus 148 329 Huntington ¬« ¬« Crocket7t Pineland Upton Reagan Coryell 317 ¬« ¬« Marlin Burke Reeves Tom Green 577 236 ¬«7 Leon ¬«94 Angelina 135 Leesville Sierra Blanca Irion o ¬« Brownwood ¬« Centerville Diboll Zavalla 149 ¬« 208 ¬« Mertzon Concho Falls ¬« Lufkin Browndell Rankin Fort Hood ¬«17 Eden McCulloch ¬«87 Big Lake 110 Lampasas 320 Lovelady Trinity «¬ San Saba ¬« ¬«21 63 San Saba Copperas CKovielleen Groveton ¬« ¤£96 Van Horn Brady Temple ¬«14 ¬«19 63 277 Harker Heights 265 Corrigan ¬« 285 ¤£ ¤£83 Lampasas Belton ¬« Robertson Midway ¤£ 349 201 ¬«53 Franklin Jasper ¬« ¬« Trinity Chester Colmesneil De Ridder o Bell OSR 45Madison Moscow 190 «¬ Mad¨¦§isonville Newton ¤£ Salado 160 Fort Stockton San Angelo ¬« Seven Oaks Menard 190 Riverside Ville Platte 293 ¬«71 195 Holland ¤£ Cameron Hearne Onalaska ¬«18 190 Schleicher 308 Polk TylerWoodville Newton 190 10 ¬« ¤£ Menard 16 ¬« ¬« PEoint Blanak st Jasper ¨¦§ ¬«29 ¬« Walker ¤£ Eldorado Lake Burnet Milam 190 Oakhurst Oberlin 349 137 Bartlett ¤£ 361 Livingston Pecos ¬« ¬« Buchanan ¬« 59 Huntsville ¤£69 Jeff Davis 118 Llano 261 Burnet Williamson 190 231 ¬« «¬ Mason ¬« ¤£ ¬« Brazos 156 ¬«77 Crockett Ozona 95 Bryan ¬« Eunice ¬«17 Mason ¬« ¬«90 Coldspring 393 377 Llano Kingsland 183 Georgetown Rockdale ¬« Fort Davis 290 ¬«163 ¤£ ¤£ ¬«47 San Jacinto El Paso ¬« 26 New Waverly Leander ¬« Taylor Grimes Sonora Marble Falls Hutto College Caldwell o 75 Shepherd 118 AndeArsnodnerson ¬« «¬ Kimble Cedar ParkRound Rock Burleson Station Beaumont 385 Lake Willis 146 Kountze ¤£ Junction ¬«71 45 Bryan SilsbeeEvadale Sutton ¬« 277 6 Montgomery ¬« 291 191 Travis ¬«36 ¬« North Cleveland 327 ¬« Austin ¬« ¬« 123 Navasota Cleveland Hardin ¬« 272 223 ¬« Somerville CoCnurto aend Shoot ¬« Sulphur Jennings ¬« 349 275 234 Lumberton Marfa ¬« Gillespie ¬« 109 ¬« ¬«62 Blanco 212 ¬« Lake Somerville ¬« 223 Lee 105 Todd MissioMnontgomery Splendora 326 210 67 Austin ¬« ¬« Magnolia Plum Grove ¬« ¤£ Camp Sw ift 10 ¨¦§ 290 Johnson City Travis AUSTIN- Patton Village Hardin Sour Lake Vidor § Fredericksburg Woodbranch Village ¨¦ £ BERGSTROM Shenandoah Liberty ¤ 21 Dayton Lakes 105 Orange Terrell Oak Hill INTERNATIONAL ¬«95 ¬« Giddings Washington Stage Coach Oak Ridge North Daisetta
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation Often Referred to As the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly
    Mr. Dale Fowler (CEcD, Victoria Economic Development Corporation, President) Web Site: http://victoriaedc.com Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 1.800.765.8198 Fax Number: 361.485.3190 Transportation Often referred to as the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly named for its outstanding location on the convergence of several major highways, the well-planned regional transportation infrastructure offers a variety of choices including rail, waterway, and air to move raw materials, finished products, and people in and out of Victoria. Highway Network and I-69 Project Victoria's excellent highway system includes US Hwy 59, US Hwy 87, US Hwy 77 with easy access to Interstate Highways I-10, I-35, and I-37. This network connects Victoria to neighboring cities, all parts of the United States, and internationally to Mexico. Victoria is the intersecting point on the "high-priority interstate I-69 corridor" project connecting south texas to Mexico. U.S. Highway 59 (future I-69) is a four-lane, divided, interstate-quality highway that extends southwest of Victoria to Laredo, and northeast to Houston where it meets I-10 and I-45. U.S. Highway 77 travels north from Victoria to the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex intersecting I-10, I-35 and I- 37, and south via a four-lane, divided highway to the Rio Grande Valley. U.S. Highway 87 travels northwest connecting Victoria with San Antonio and providing access to I-35, and to the southeast connecting with Port Lavaca. Rail Union Pacific (UP) is the primary operator of the rail lines in Victoria County. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Kansas City Southern (KCS) have track rights to operate on the UP lines.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION
    2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ports 2017-2018 Capital Program: Project Summaries
    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports
    Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports Interim Report to the 85th Legislature November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAIRMAN'S LETTER………………………………………………………………. 2 REPORT SIGNATORIES…………………………………………………………….. 3 COMMITTEE COMPOSITION AND PROCEEDINGS……………………………. 4 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY……………………………………………………. 5 ISSUES AND FINDINGS……………………………………………………………...17 RECOMMENDATIONS ……………………………………………………………...21 1 Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports November 18, 2016 Dear Members and Fellow Texans: Enclosed is the interim report for the Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports, commissioned by Lt. Governor Patrick. I would like to thank him for his attention to these essential waypoints of the Texas economy and for the privilege of chairing the Committee. In the past months, my Senate colleagues and I have studied our state’s port assets (both coastal and inland hubs) and paid particular attention to the economic impact of the Panama Canal expansion. We have arrived at a number of conclusions on the matter of what our state’s economy must do to compete and grow. Thanks to the tireless efforts of this committee and the enthusiastic support of port authorities across the state, we have a much clearer picture of the unique role Texas ports play in our state’s economy. They are indispensable gateways to trade and economic growth which have fueled our state’s rise to the top ranking among America’s exporting states. That ranking is reflective of our ports’ ability to handle more than 20 percent of our nation’s total export tonnage. As improvements to the Panama Canal create a flow of larger vessels from distant trading partners, we must ensure Texas ports are equipped to sustain our economic leadership role.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Port Mission Plan: Investment Strategy
    PORT AUTHORITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN: INVESTMENT STRATEGY 86TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN: INVESTMENT STRATEGY 86TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION TABLE OF CONTENTS Project cargo at the Calhoun Port Authority. Letter From the Chairwoman ..................................... ii The Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC) ..... iii Mission ...................................................................... iii Purpose ........................................................................ 1 Statewide Impact ...................................................... 1 Port Investment is a Statewide Growth Strategy .... 2 Capital Investment ..................................................... 2 Resiliency .................................................................. 2 Types of Port Facilities ............................................... 4 Barge moving cargo near the Port of Harlingen. Port System Overview ................................................ 6 How the Port System Works ...................................... 8 Waterways ................................................................. 9 Port Facilities ............................................................. 9 Inland Connectivity .................................................... 9 Port Capital Program ............................................... 10 Ship Channel Improvement Report ...........................11 Port Connectivity Report...........................................11 Planned Port System
    [Show full text]
  • Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook
    TTI: 0-6890 Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook Technical Report 0-6890-P1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6890-P1.pdf PORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION REINVESTMENT ZONE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDEBOOK by: Rafael M. Aldrete Abhisek Mudgal Senior Research Scientist Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Sharada Vadali Juan Carlos Villa Associate Research Scientist Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Carl James Kruse Lorenzo Cornejo Research Scientist Assistant Transportation Researcher Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute David Salgado Deog Sang Bae Associate Transportation Researcher Graduate Assistant Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Product 0-6890-P1 Project 0-6890 Project Title: Tools for Port TRZs and TRZs for Multimodal Applications Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation Published: March 2017 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this product reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies
    [Show full text]
  • Port At-A-Glance
    PORT AT-A-GLANCE Port of Orange • Orange, TX Orange County Navigation & Port District Legal Name: Orange County Navigation and Port District 1201 Childers Road Draft: Deep Table of Contents Orange, Texas 77632 (409) 883-4363 Depth: 30 ft. channel www.portoforange.com Width: 200 ft. 1. Calhoun Port Authority Port Director 2. Port of Bay City Gene Bouillion Tonnage¹ 3. Port of Beaumont Quick Facts: The Port of Orange is 94,504 4. Port of BrownsvilleF oreign Trade Zone: #117 located on the Sabine- Neches waterway and is 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,0005. 100,000Port of Corpus Christi linked to the “Golden Triangle” ports which 6. Port Freeport include the Port of Port Arthur, Beaumont and 7. Port of Galveston Orange. This area has 8. Port of Harlingen become strategically more important to Texas Annual Economic Impact: $ 1.9 million9. Port of Houston ports growth since 2003. 10. Port of Port Isabel The Port of Orange has Top Commodities Connectivity acted as a successful 11. Port of Orange landlord port, On-site Marine Services which Rail complementing activities include: 12. Port of PalaciosOrange Port Terminal at larger ports on the Shipyards that can Railway providing Sabine-Neches channel. accommodate new 13. Port of Portswitching Arthur service to It is also used for lay construction Union Pacific and berthing. 14. Port of Port Mansfield Repairs of tugs, barges and agreement with BNSF. offshore petroleum drilling 15. Port of Texas City platforms Roadway Connection Dry dock services for barges 16. Port of VictoriaSH 87 and tugs IH 10 17.
    [Show full text]
  • LANDSIDE ACCESS NEEDS for DEEPWATER PORTS September 2005, Revised December 2005; 2Nd Revision: January 2006 6
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-06/0-4437-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date LANDSIDE ACCESS NEEDS FOR DEEPWATER PORTS September 2005, Revised December 2005; 2nd Revision: January 2006 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Michael Bomba, Diya Mazumder, Nathan Hutson, Rob 0-4437-1 Harrison 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-4437 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report, 2002-2005 Research and Technology Implementation Office 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Landside Access Needs at Texas Deepwater Ports 16. Abstract The following report chronicles the landside access needs at Texas deepwater seaports. It focuses on how the needs for Landside Access improvements are assessed, planned and financed. Trends in maritime trade in Texas are analyzed. The report also provides guidelines for Metropolitan Planning Organizations and ports in prioritizing their landside access needs. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Landside Access, Ports, MPOs, Short Sea Shipping No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161; www.ntis.gov. 19. Security Classif.
    [Show full text]
  • 2040 Transportation Plan
    Adopted by Policy Advisory Committee: April 14, 2015 First APagem | e1-n1 dment Adopted by Policy Advisory Committee: November 10, 2015 Victoria 2040 Long-Range Metropolitan Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................... 1-1 The Victoria Metropolitan Planning Organization ............................................. 1-2 Relevance of the Long-Range Metropolitan Transportation Plan ...................... 1-4 The Life Cycle of a Transportation Project ........................................................................... 1-4 Frequently Asked Questions about an MPO ....................................................... 1-7 What is an MPO and what does it do? .................................................................................. 1-7 Who is on the MPO? Who’s in charge? ................................................................................ 1-9 Frequently Asked Questions about the MTP ...................................................... 1-9 Why do we need a plan? ....................................................................................................... 1-9 Who prepares the plan? Who approves it? .......................................................................... 1-10 What travel modes are addressed in the plan? .................................................................... 1-10 What area does the plan cover? ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guía De Exportación De Texas Ayudar a Las Empresas De Texas a Globalizarse 2017
    Guía de Exportación de Texas Ayudar a las empresas de Texas a globalizarse 2017 4 Abiertos al mundo 10 Exportaciones metropolitanas de Houston 12 Puertos y aeropuertos 19 Longhorn Global BizNet 20 Puerto de Laredo 22 Dallas, EE. UU. Connecting Importers & Exporters Worldwide 24 Financiamiento comercial Texas. Think.Global 28 Derecho internacional 30 Directorio de recursos Guía de Exportación de Texas Ayudar a las empresas de Texas a globalizarse Índice Carta del Gobernador .............................................. 4 Lea la Red del Centro de Desarrollo de Pequeñas Empresas de Texas .............. 5 edición digital Preguntas y respuestas: Texas es una potencia mundial .................... 5 Las 10 mejores prácticas para los exportadores de Texas ................... 6 Texas Export Guide Helping Texas Companies Go Global 2017 Datos comerciales sobre las exportaciones de Texas ....................... 7 Asistencia al comercio del SBDC ..................................... 8 Programa de expansión comercial del Estado ............................ 9 Houston: El área metropolitana n.º 1 para las exportaciones en los EE. UU. ..10 4 Going Global 10 Houston Metro Exports 12 Ports & Airports 19 Longhorn Global BizNet Puerta de enlace mundial de carga aérea: Aeropuertos de Houston ..........12 20 Port Laredo 22 Dallas USA Connecting Importers & Exporters Worldwide 24 Trade Finance Texas. Think.Global El Puerto de Houston predice un gran incremento de las exportaciones ......14 28 International Law 30 Resource Directory Puerto de Galveston: Un importante
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT SUMMARIES Port Authority Advisory Committee
    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port Authority Advisory Committee Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM Page 1 Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Giant Awakens
    aug. 29-31, 2017 San Antonio, Texas . Henry B. Gonzalez Convention Center the Giant awakens WHY SHOULD YOU EXHIBIT AND SPONSOR? You’ll meet hundreds of qualified buyers Exhibiting at Hart Energy’s DUG The prolific Eagle Ford shale ranks among the Permian Basin and the SCOOP/STACK for rising rig count. As operators adapt to today’s conferences, the world’s largest breakeven prices, meeting business prospects face-to-face is the best series of unconventional resource way for your company to sell itself. development events, Everyone does online research, yet when significant money is on the delivers exceptional value. line, no one trusts a website alone. They check you out, talk with other clients, and negotiate directly before they buy. That’s why you must have a It’s all part of the“DUG experience.” presence on the exhibit floor at DUG Eagle Ford. DUG Eagle Ford offers specific value for you What makes DUG Eagle Ford exceptionally effective for you and your sales team? The quality of its attendees. This conference presents serious information and attracts serious players. Construction/ Consulting/Environmental/ Manufacturing/ Legal/Regulatory Who attends DUG Eagle Ford? Engineering 6% Over 30% of our attendees work 2% for producers and operators! JOB FUNCTION Banking/Finance 3% n Executive/Management ................................................31% n Engineering/Technical ..................................................17% Service & Supply n Purchasing/Procurement ................................................3% Midstream 43% Operators n 1% Administrative/Consulting/Legal ....................................1% Oil and Gas n Business Development/Marketing ..............................30% Operators/Producers 30% n Other .................................................................................17% Other 15% Business Development/ Marketing Other 30% 17% COMPANY TYPE Purchasing/ Engineering/Technical Procurement n Oil and Gas Operators/Producers ............................
    [Show full text]