Port Connectivity Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Port Connectivity Report TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - MARITIME DIVISION Port Connectivity Report 2020-2021 TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN TxDOT Maritime Port Connectivity Report 2020-2021 TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN Galveston cruise terminal. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................. 1 Challenges for Port Connectivity ................................ 1 Freight Conscious Roadway Design ......................... 2 Description of Issue ................................................... 2 Case Study ................................................................ 2 Solution ..................................................................... 3 Truck Queuing ............................................................. 4 Description of Issue ................................................... 4 Beaumont truck route, Sycamore and Madison. Case Study ................................................................ 4 Photo Credit: TxDOT Solution ..................................................................... 4 Modal Conflicts ........................................................... 5 Description of Issue ................................................... 5 Case Study ................................................................ 5 Solution ..................................................................... 5 Incompatible Land Uses ............................................. 6 Description of Issue ................................................... 6 Case Study ................................................................ 6 Solution ..................................................................... 6 Previous Connectivity Activities ................................ 7 Connectivity Funding Needs ...................................... 8 Solutions to Enhance Texas Port Connectivity ........ 9 Data Collection and Methodology ........................... 10 Galveston wharf area wind cargo. Beaumont port operations. Project List ................................................................. 12 2020-2021 Texas Port Mission Plan: Port Connectivity Report Page i TxDOT Maritime Ports Studied Port of Port of Orange Beaumont INTRODUCTION Port of Beaumont Texas’s seaports rely on a strong multi-modal freight network with Cedar Bayou Navigation District landside connections including roadways, railroads, and pipelines that Port of facilitate the movement of materials, goods and people to and from the Port Houston Orange ports. Even the perception of landside mobility challenges can cause Port of Ports Port Houston Challenges for Port PortP oofr t Arthur shippers to re-route goods and the cruise industry to re-route ships Port Arthur away from Texas ports. Investments in inland connectivity not only Connectivity Deep Draft Channel Sabine Neches make the individual ports more competitive, but also contribute to the Transportation conditions and Shallow Draft Channel Navigation District competitiveness of the state and nation so that it can continue to be a Port of needs are unique to each port. Texas City maritime trade leader. To continue to support this economic vitality, the State should consider strategic investments in infrastructure to sustain These can include challenges 0 30 60 expected increases in shipping activity. These investments could include as diverse as incompatible ° Miles Port Freeport inland connectivity improvements. PorPt ofrt of surrounding lands uses, modal GalGveaslvtoenston Port of The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Maritime Division has incompatibility and conflicts, Calhoun Bay City CPaolrht oAuunthority Port of Port Freeport Port Authority Bay City completed this Port Connectivity Report as part of the 2020-2021 Texas operational inefficiencies and Port Mission Plan (PMP), the maritime mission plan required in Chapter insufficient design for the 55 of the Texas Transportation Code. The PMP highlights the importance of investing in the port system in order to meet the growth potential of needs of freight operators. In Port of Port of Victoria global trade opportunities. The Port Connectivity Report was developed combination, these challenges Port of Palacios Port of to assess the current state of inland connectivity at 14 public ports along Victoria lead to inefficiencies for multi- Palacios the Texas Gulf Coast. It focuses on roadway connections between the modal freight movement that West port gates and major freight corridors, what some may know as the Calhoun first/last mile for a port. While each port has unique challenges, there can prevent cost-effective and Aransas County are several connectivity challenges that are shared by multiple ports. efficient operations. Navigation District This study evaluates the existing conditions of landside port access Gulf of roads, identifies problems or areas of concern, and proposes potential Mexico solutions to address those issues. The outcome of this analysis is a list Gulf of of recommended solutions that the ports and TxDOT can evaluate for Port of Mexico potential implementation. Corpus Christi Port of Corpus Christi Ports Port Port of Deep Draft Channel Mansfield Harlingen Shallow Draft Channel Port of Harlingen Port of 0 30 60 Port Isabel ° Miles Port of Brownsville 2020-2021 Texas Port Mission Plan: Port Connectivity Report Page 1 Port of Port Isabel Port of Brownsville TxDOT Maritime TxDOT Maritime FREIGHT CONSCIOUS ROADWAY DESIGN FREIGHT CONSCIOUS ROADWAY DESIGN Description of Issue Solution Local roadway access routes between Texas ports and Consider these roadway design factors during rehabilitation Adequate Bridge and Pavement Maintenance and the highway network provide the final, critical link in the or reconstruction planning for local roads that accommodate Design: Deteriorated pavement and structures are causes complex system that has evolved to move freight through significant freight traffic: of concern for truck operators. Trucks create high levels the state and beyond. The location, design, and operational of wear on roadway surfaces and bridges. In some cases, conditions of local truck routes affect both the efficiency of Direct link to Highway Freight Network: A local freight pavement or bridge conditions may deteriorate to the point freight movement and the impacts of truck traffic on port route can minimize conflicts with other roadway users and that weight restrictions are necessary, forcing trucks to find communities. By designing roadways that better support the adjacent land uses when it offers the most direct practical alternate connections to the freight network. movement of trucks, connecting goods to the transportation connection. The shortest route between the port and the system can be made more efficient, safer, and less disruptive freight network that offers the least indirection of travel Adequate Vertical Clearances: Bridges, sign structures, to residents and the traveling public. Local roadways for trucks is the most desirable. Routes that present few utility lines, signal structures and other overhanging items providing the “last mile” connections between ports and complexities such as turns or one-way street segments ease can cause safety and operational issues for truck traffic. Older bridges, especially those not constructed to current the highway freight network may have narrow lanes, Oversize/overweight cargo moving from the navigation. lack sufficient shoulders, have small turning radii at key Port of Port Arthur on local road network. vertical clearance standards, can be particularly problematic, intersections, and may lack wayfinding signage. Additionally, Adequate Road Geometry: Trucks and other large especially if roadway overlays have gradually reduced these these roads may not be constructed for oversize/overweight vehicles operate most efficiently when roadway design is clearances even further. (OS/OW) vehicles that are often traveling in and out of appropriate for their size, turning ability, and acceleration/ ports, which may deteriorate pavement conditions faster deceleration characteristics. Important geometric Operational Characteristics: Several key roadway than anticipated. Even on limited access facilities, freight considerations include number of lanes, intersections with operational factors can affect the utility of truck routes. design is important since trucks need longer acceleration adequate turning radii and queueing lanes for long vehicles, Such factors include adequate signal clearance phases or and deceleration lanes than passenger vehicles. Because adequate shoulder width to allow disabled trucks to move protected turn phases and adequate signage for trucks to of their higher center of mass, trucks are susceptible to out of traffic, absence of physical bottlenecks that can cause utilize designated routes for port access. overturning on sharp roadway curves. Changes in roadway congestion, minimal steep grade changes, and the absence elevation can limit sight distance, which can affect safe of right-of-way encroachments. stopping distances. With the trends of freight movement by truck projected to increase, designing for freight is critical to maintaining safe and operational roadways. Port of Brownsville wind cargo. Case Study The Port of Port Arthur is an important facility for handling break-bulk cargo, including forest products, steel, and military deployments. It is located 20 miles from the National Highway Freight Network and the heavy truck traffic generated Freight movement by truck by port activities rely on the state and local
Recommended publications
  • 4-Year Work Plan by District for Fys 2015-2018
    4 Year Work Plan by District for FYs 2015 - 2018 Overview Section §201.998 of the Transportation code requires that a Department Work Program report be provided to the Legislature. Under this law, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) provides the following information within this report. Consistently-formatted work program for each of TxDOT's 25 districts based on Unified Transportation Program. Covers four-year period and contains all projects that the district proposes to implement during that period. Includes progress report on major transportation projects and other district projects. Per 43 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 16 Subchapter C rule §16.106, a major transportation project is the planning, engineering, right of way acquisition, expansion, improvement, addition, or contract maintenance, other than the routine or contracted routine maintenance, of a bridge, highway, toll road, or toll road system on the state highway system that fulfills or satisfies a particular need, concern, or strategy of the department in meeting the transportation goals established under §16.105 of this subchapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)). A project may be designated by the department as a major transportation project if it meets one or more of the criteria specified below: 1) The project has a total estimated cost of $500 million or more. All costs associated with the project from the environmental phase through final construction, including adequate contingencies and reserves for all cost elements, will be included in computing the total estimated cost regardless of the source of funding. The costs will be expressed in year of expenditure dollars. 2) There is a high level of public or legislative interest in the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Often Referred to As the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly
    Mr. Dale Fowler (CEcD, Victoria Economic Development Corporation, President) Web Site: http://victoriaedc.com Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 1.800.765.8198 Fax Number: 361.485.3190 Transportation Often referred to as the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly named for its outstanding location on the convergence of several major highways, the well-planned regional transportation infrastructure offers a variety of choices including rail, waterway, and air to move raw materials, finished products, and people in and out of Victoria. Highway Network and I-69 Project Victoria's excellent highway system includes US Hwy 59, US Hwy 87, US Hwy 77 with easy access to Interstate Highways I-10, I-35, and I-37. This network connects Victoria to neighboring cities, all parts of the United States, and internationally to Mexico. Victoria is the intersecting point on the "high-priority interstate I-69 corridor" project connecting south texas to Mexico. U.S. Highway 59 (future I-69) is a four-lane, divided, interstate-quality highway that extends southwest of Victoria to Laredo, and northeast to Houston where it meets I-10 and I-45. U.S. Highway 77 travels north from Victoria to the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex intersecting I-10, I-35 and I- 37, and south via a four-lane, divided highway to the Rio Grande Valley. U.S. Highway 87 travels northwest connecting Victoria with San Antonio and providing access to I-35, and to the southeast connecting with Port Lavaca. Rail Union Pacific (UP) is the primary operator of the rail lines in Victoria County. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Kansas City Southern (KCS) have track rights to operate on the UP lines.
    [Show full text]
  • DOT Marine Highway Projects
    Cross Sound Ferry Enhancement Project Applicant: Connecticut Department of Transportation Corridor: M-95 Marine Highway Corridor (Sponsor: I-95 Corridor Coalition) Project Snapshot: The Cross Sound Ferry Enhancements Project would improve three passenger/vehicle ferries operating between New London, Connecticut and Orient Point, Long Island. Combined, the enhancements would increase capacity and efficiency of the service while reducing vessel emissions, further improving the service’s footprint. Attributes: This service provides 12,000 one-way vessel trips each year along a 16-mile water route, eliminating a 166-mile highway drive through congested portions of Long Island, New York City and Connecticut along the I-95 Corridor. The project offers the opportunity to increase capacity, saving nearly 500,000 additional highway miles. One of many public benefits offered by this project is improved livability through reduction of traffic in highly congested urban centers. Other benefits include emissions reductions, energy savings and landside transportation infrastructure maintenance savings. The U.S. Department of Transportation will work with the Connecticut Department of Transportation, the I-95 Corridor Coalition and other Federal Departments to identify appropriate actions to help expand capacity, reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency of the vessels. New England Marine Highway Expansion Project Applicant: Maine Department of Transportation Corridor : M-95 Marine Highway Corridor (Sponsor: I-95 Corridor Coalition) Project Snapshot: The Northeast Marine Highway Expansion Project will expand an existing container-on-barge service operating between Newark, New Jersey, Boston, Massachusetts and Portland, Maine. This will be accomplished by design and construction of an articulated tug and barge that rigidly connects the two vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION
    2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ports 2017-2018 Capital Program: Project Summaries
    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • (Cancels Tariff No. 4) Rates, Charges, Rules, Regulations
    PORT FREEPORT TARIFF NO. 005 (CANCELS TARIFF NO. 4) RATES, CHARGES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND SERVICES AVAILABLE AT PUBLIC WHARVES ISSUED BY PORT FREEPORT 1100 CHERRY ST. FREEPORT, TX 77541 TELEPHONE (979) 233-2667 ISSUED: October 26, 2017 EFFECTIVE: November 1, 2017 PORT FREEPORT TARIFF NO. 005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A SUBJECT ITEM RULE PAGE Section 1: Table of Contents 34 A - B Gulf Seaports Marine Term. Conf. 34 1 Section 1: Rules and Jurisdiction 34 2-3 Jurisdiction of Port Freeport General Authority Cargo Statements Records Access Delinquent List Application Section 2: Abbreviations 34 4 Definitions 34 4-9 Section 3: Waterway Regulations Disposal of Oily Residue and Water 305 34 9 Ballast, Rubbish, Trash 310 34 9 Signs 315 34 10 Speed Limit 320 34 10 Collisions 325 34 10 Berth Applications and Arrangements 330 34 11-12 Section 4: Regulations on Use of Facilities Bunkers and Bunkering 335 34 13 Cleanliness of Premises 340 34 13 Safety 345 34 14 Damage to Property of Port Freeport 350 34 15 Damage or Loss and Liability 355 34 15 Fire Prevention 365 34 16 Fumigation Requirements 370 34 16 Handling of Hazardous Commodities 375 34 16-17 Insurance 380 34 17-18 Port Security Measures 385 34 19-24 Port Security Fees 390 34 24-25 Payment of Bills 395 34 26-27 Stevedore Contract License 405 34 27-31 Welding/Hot Work 410 34 32 Section 5: Vessel Regulations Dockage Charges 415 34 33-34 Shed Hire 420 34 34 Pilotage Rates 425 34 35 Section 6: Space Rentals, Free Time, and Penalties Conditions Governing Merchandise 430 34 36 Free Time 435 34 36 Section 7: Equipment Charges Damage by Equipment 440 34 37 Equipment Charges 445 34 37-38 Removal of Objects from Channel 450 34 39 Responsibility of User on Equipment 39 Rented from Port Freeport 455 34 Use of Privately Owned Cranes 460 34 40 ISSUED: October 26, 2017 Effective: November 1, 2017 PORT FREEPORT TARIFF NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports
    Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports Interim Report to the 85th Legislature November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAIRMAN'S LETTER………………………………………………………………. 2 REPORT SIGNATORIES…………………………………………………………….. 3 COMMITTEE COMPOSITION AND PROCEEDINGS……………………………. 4 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY……………………………………………………. 5 ISSUES AND FINDINGS……………………………………………………………...17 RECOMMENDATIONS ……………………………………………………………...21 1 Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports November 18, 2016 Dear Members and Fellow Texans: Enclosed is the interim report for the Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports, commissioned by Lt. Governor Patrick. I would like to thank him for his attention to these essential waypoints of the Texas economy and for the privilege of chairing the Committee. In the past months, my Senate colleagues and I have studied our state’s port assets (both coastal and inland hubs) and paid particular attention to the economic impact of the Panama Canal expansion. We have arrived at a number of conclusions on the matter of what our state’s economy must do to compete and grow. Thanks to the tireless efforts of this committee and the enthusiastic support of port authorities across the state, we have a much clearer picture of the unique role Texas ports play in our state’s economy. They are indispensable gateways to trade and economic growth which have fueled our state’s rise to the top ranking among America’s exporting states. That ranking is reflective of our ports’ ability to handle more than 20 percent of our nation’s total export tonnage. As improvements to the Panama Canal create a flow of larger vessels from distant trading partners, we must ensure Texas ports are equipped to sustain our economic leadership role.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Port Mission Plan: Investment Strategy
    PORT AUTHORITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN: INVESTMENT STRATEGY 86TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN: INVESTMENT STRATEGY 86TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION TABLE OF CONTENTS Project cargo at the Calhoun Port Authority. Letter From the Chairwoman ..................................... ii The Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC) ..... iii Mission ...................................................................... iii Purpose ........................................................................ 1 Statewide Impact ...................................................... 1 Port Investment is a Statewide Growth Strategy .... 2 Capital Investment ..................................................... 2 Resiliency .................................................................. 2 Types of Port Facilities ............................................... 4 Barge moving cargo near the Port of Harlingen. Port System Overview ................................................ 6 How the Port System Works ...................................... 8 Waterways ................................................................. 9 Port Facilities ............................................................. 9 Inland Connectivity .................................................... 9 Port Capital Program ............................................... 10 Ship Channel Improvement Report ...........................11 Port Connectivity Report...........................................11 Planned Port System
    [Show full text]
  • US Development Group to Open State-Of-The-Art $130 Million Multi
    US Development Group to open state-of-the-art $130 million multi-modal terminal in Port Arthur Project to create more than 1,200 construction jobs and more than 40 long-term jobs in Jefferson County PORT ARTHUR, Texas — (December 15, 2020) – US Development Group, LLC (USDG), through Port Arthur Terminal LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary, today announced the development of a multi-modal oil handling terminal in Port Arthur, Texas. The terminal is specially designed to handle DRUbit™, a proprietary blend of Canadian heavy crude oil formulated to be non-hazardous and non-flammable for transportation by rail. Scheduled for completion in the second quarter of 2021, the Port Arthur Terminal represents a capital investment of more than $130 million that is expected to bring more than 1,200 direct and indirect construction jobs to the City of Port Arthur and Jefferson County as well as more than 40 full-time jobs once the facility begins commercial operations. “USDG is pleased to be part of the Port Arthur community and construct the first-of-its-kind destination terminal,” said Dan Borgen, US Development Group CEO and President. “By giving producers in the Canadian oil sands a safe and efficient means of transporting product to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries and manufacturers, we anticipate the new terminal will represent a long-term investment for USDG with continued growth. We look forward to playing a role in the economic prosperity of Port Arthur and Jefferson County in the coming years. Moreover, USDG’s patented DRUbit™ process produces a non- hazardous transportation product that has great economic benefits for Port Arthur area refineries.” “We would like to recognize several city and county leaders who were instrumental in making the Port Arthur terminal project come to fruition, including the Honorable County Judge Jeff Branick and the Jefferson County Commissioners, the Honorable Mayor Thurman Bill Bartie and the Port Arthur City Council, City Manager Ron Burton and their combined staffs.
    [Show full text]
  • 37.99 ACRES of LAND Sabine Pass @ Intracoastal Canal Pleasure Island, Port Arthur, Texas
    37.99 ACRES OF LAND Sabine Pass @ Intracoastal Canal Pleasure Island, Port Arthur, Texas For Sale By: Fred Ghabriel Bejjani & Associates 713.659.3333 Sabine Pass / Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Land Pleasure Island, Highway 82/Ship Channel Port Arthur, TX 77643 Disclaimer DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This confidential memorandum has been prepared solely for information purposes and is not to be used for any other purpose. No representations or warranties, express or implied, by operation of law or otherwise, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, or as to the condition, quality or fitness of the property and neither Seller nor Bejjani & Associates nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees, stockholders, owners, affiliates, or agents will have any liability to receiving party or any other person resulting from receiving party's or any other person's use of this confidential memorandum. The property will be sold "as is", "where is" and "with all faults" as of the date of closing. Receiving party will have an opportunity to perform its own examination and inspection of the property and information relating to same and must rely solely on its own independent examination and investigation and not on any information provided by Seller or Bejjani & Associates. Page 2 of 14 Sabine Pass / Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Land Pleasure Island, Highway 82/Ship Channel Port Arthur, TX 77643 Property Description Asking Price Please Call Property 37.99 Acres Sabine Pass / Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Land Pleasure Island Highway 82/Ship Channel Jefferson County Port Arthur, TX 77643 For Lease or Sale 37.99 Acres (Or Partial) Location The property is sandwiched between the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (Sabine- Neches Ship Channel) and State Highway 82, on Pleasure Island, Port Arthur - Gulf of Mexico, Jefferson County, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook
    TTI: 0-6890 Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook Technical Report 0-6890-P1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6890-P1.pdf PORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION REINVESTMENT ZONE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDEBOOK by: Rafael M. Aldrete Abhisek Mudgal Senior Research Scientist Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Sharada Vadali Juan Carlos Villa Associate Research Scientist Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Carl James Kruse Lorenzo Cornejo Research Scientist Assistant Transportation Researcher Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute David Salgado Deog Sang Bae Associate Transportation Researcher Graduate Assistant Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Product 0-6890-P1 Project 0-6890 Project Title: Tools for Port TRZs and TRZs for Multimodal Applications Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation Published: March 2017 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this product reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies
    [Show full text]
  • Port At-A-Glance
    PORT AT-A-GLANCE Port of Orange • Orange, TX Orange County Navigation & Port District Legal Name: Orange County Navigation and Port District 1201 Childers Road Draft: Deep Table of Contents Orange, Texas 77632 (409) 883-4363 Depth: 30 ft. channel www.portoforange.com Width: 200 ft. 1. Calhoun Port Authority Port Director 2. Port of Bay City Gene Bouillion Tonnage¹ 3. Port of Beaumont Quick Facts: The Port of Orange is 94,504 4. Port of BrownsvilleF oreign Trade Zone: #117 located on the Sabine- Neches waterway and is 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,0005. 100,000Port of Corpus Christi linked to the “Golden Triangle” ports which 6. Port Freeport include the Port of Port Arthur, Beaumont and 7. Port of Galveston Orange. This area has 8. Port of Harlingen become strategically more important to Texas Annual Economic Impact: $ 1.9 million9. Port of Houston ports growth since 2003. 10. Port of Port Isabel The Port of Orange has Top Commodities Connectivity acted as a successful 11. Port of Orange landlord port, On-site Marine Services which Rail complementing activities include: 12. Port of PalaciosOrange Port Terminal at larger ports on the Shipyards that can Railway providing Sabine-Neches channel. accommodate new 13. Port of Portswitching Arthur service to It is also used for lay construction Union Pacific and berthing. 14. Port of Port Mansfield Repairs of tugs, barges and agreement with BNSF. offshore petroleum drilling 15. Port of Texas City platforms Roadway Connection Dry dock services for barges 16. Port of VictoriaSH 87 and tugs IH 10 17.
    [Show full text]