DOCSLIB.ORG

An Analysis of the Value of Texas Seaports in an Environment of Increasing Global Trade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Analysis of the Value of Texas Seaports in an Environment of Increasing Global Trade Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5538-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date An Analysis of the Value of Texas Seaports in an Environment February 2008; Rev. October 2008 of Increasing Global Trade 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Peter Siegesmund, Jim Kruse, Jolanda Prozzi, Rene Alsup, 0-5538-1 Rob Harrison 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5538 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office January 2006–August 2007 P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract This study undertook an economic impact exercise for all Texas ports, updated a similar study done a decade earlier, and so assisted TxDOT with incorporating the most recent marine port impacts into their state transportation planning. The study was awarded to a joint CTR-TTI team but work did not begin until the scope was clarified by TxDOT, following concerns expressed by some members of the Texas Ports Association (TPA). Almost all the larger Texas ports had undertaken economic impact studies and were understandably concerned about any new study providing different answers. This was highly likely as economic impact output is influenced by the timing, scale, and specifications of each study. Accordingly, it was agreed that where a Texas port had already completed an economic impact study, the results would be reported to TxDOT in this project. The work also provided both a forecast of container growth at Texas terminals and an estimate of the economic impact of Texas ports on the U.S economy. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Texas ports, siltation, dredging, economic impacts, No restrictions. This document is available to the IMPLAN, I/O public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161; www.ntis.gov. 19. Security Classif. (of report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 122 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized An Analysis of the Value of Texas Seaports in an Environment of Increasing Global Trade Peter Siegesmund Jim Kruse Jolanda Prozzi Rene Alsup Rob Harrison CTR Technical Report: 0-5538-1 Report Date: February 2008; Rev. October 2008 Project: 0-5538 Project Title: The Value of Texas Seaports in an Environment of Increasing Global Trade Sponsoring Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Performing Agency: Center for Transportation Research at The University of Texas at Austin Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 3208 Red River Austin, TX 78705 www.utexas.edu/research/ctr Copyright (c) 2009 Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America iv Disclaimers Author's Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Federal Highway Administration or the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Patent Disclaimer: There was no invention or discovery conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the course of or under this contract, including any art, method, process, machine manufacture, design or composition of matter, or any new useful improvement thereof, or any variety of plant, which is or may be patentable under the patent laws of the United States of America or any foreign country. Engineering Disclaimer NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, OR PERMIT PURPOSES. Research Supervisor: Rob Harrison v Acknowledgments The authors wish to acknowledge the support given by Raul Cantu P.E. (MMO) who worked with great success as the Project Director. We also wish to recognize the role played by the members of the Texas Port Association (TPA) who helped frame the work, provided data from the economic impact assessments undertaken by Martin and Associates, and who acted as reviewers of much of the work at their regular meetings during the study period. This effort was coordinated by John Roby (Port of Beaumont) who facilitated interactions between the team and the TPA. Dr. David Luskin, Senior Economist, HDR Engineering proposed the use of the USAGE-ITC model when he was working at the Center for Transportation Research and subsequently assisted in interpreting its output in the project. Finally, Dr. Marinos Tsigas, Economist, United States International Trade Commission, provided guidance throughout the USAGE-ITC evaluation and played an important part in successfully applying the model in the study. This work does not represent the views of the U.S. International Trade Commission or any of its Commissioners. vi Table of Contents Chapter 1. Background and Introduction .................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Background ..................................................................................................................2 1.3 Study 0-5538: Proposal Modification ....................................................................................3 1.4 Report Outline ........................................................................................................................4 Chapter 2. Port Activities and Economic Impact Methodologies ............................................ 5 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................5 2.2 Evaluating Local and Regional Impacts with IMPLAN ........................................................6 2.3 Analyzing the National Impacts of Channel Maintenance Using a Computable General Equilibrium Model .........................................................................................................7 2.4 Concluding Remarks ............................................................................................................10 Chapter 3. Transportation Cost Penalty Associated with Channel Siltation ........................ 13 3.1 Shallow Draft Channels .......................................................................................................14 3.2 Deep Draft Channels ............................................................................................................20 3.3 Dredging Costs ....................................................................................................................22 3.4 Summary ..............................................................................................................................24 Chapter 4. The National Economic Impacts of Maintaining Texas’ Waterways ................. 25 4.1 The Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Texas’ Shallow Draft Channels ................................25 4.2 Texas Deep Draft Channels .................................................................................................32 Chapter 5. Local and Regional Texas Port Economic Impacts .............................................. 37 5.1 Port of Galveston .................................................................................................................37 5.2 Port of Harlingen .................................................................................................................39 5.3 Port of Port Isabel (The Port Isabel-San Benito Navigation District) .................................42 5.4 Port Mansfield ......................................................................................................................45 5.5 Port of Palacios ....................................................................................................................47 5.6 Port of Orange ......................................................................................................................49 Chapter 6. Container Forecast for Texas Terminals ............................................................... 53 Chapter 7. Concluding Remarks ............................................................................................... 57 7.1 Texas Port Economic Impact Data for 2006 ........................................................................57 7.2 Texas Container Forecasting ...............................................................................................59 7.3 Impacts of Dredging Texas Shallow Draft Waterways on the U.S Economy .....................59 7.4 Deep Draft Texas Channels .................................................................................................60 References ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation Often Referred to As the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly
    Mr. Dale Fowler (CEcD, Victoria Economic Development Corporation, President) Web Site: http://victoriaedc.com Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 1.800.765.8198 Fax Number: 361.485.3190 Transportation Often referred to as the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly named for its outstanding location on the convergence of several major highways, the well-planned regional transportation infrastructure offers a variety of choices including rail, waterway, and air to move raw materials, finished products, and people in and out of Victoria. Highway Network and I-69 Project Victoria's excellent highway system includes US Hwy 59, US Hwy 87, US Hwy 77 with easy access to Interstate Highways I-10, I-35, and I-37. This network connects Victoria to neighboring cities, all parts of the United States, and internationally to Mexico. Victoria is the intersecting point on the "high-priority interstate I-69 corridor" project connecting south texas to Mexico. U.S. Highway 59 (future I-69) is a four-lane, divided, interstate-quality highway that extends southwest of Victoria to Laredo, and northeast to Houston where it meets I-10 and I-45. U.S. Highway 77 travels north from Victoria to the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex intersecting I-10, I-35 and I- 37, and south via a four-lane, divided highway to the Rio Grande Valley. U.S. Highway 87 travels northwest connecting Victoria with San Antonio and providing access to I-35, and to the southeast connecting with Port Lavaca. Rail Union Pacific (UP) is the primary operator of the rail lines in Victoria County. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Kansas City Southern (KCS) have track rights to operate on the UP lines.
    [Show full text]
  • View and Summary of Methods Used
    January 2015 The Economic Importance of Texas’ Coastal Counties: An Analysis of the Dependence of Texas and its Regions on Business Operations in the Tier 1 Windstorm Insurance Coverage Area THE PERRYMAN GROUP 510 N. Valley Mills Dr., Suite 300 Waco, TX 76710 ph. 254.751.9595, fax 254.751.7855 [email protected] www.perrymangroup.com The Economic Importance of Texas’ Coastal Counties: An Analysis of the Dependence of Texas and its Regions on Business Operations in the Tier 1 Windstorm Insurance Coverage Area Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Study Overview and Summary of Methods Used ............................................................................. 1 Highlights of Study Findings ................................................................................................................. 2 Importance of the Tier 1 Area to the State Economy ..................................... 4 Economic Forecast for the Tier 1 Area ............................................................................................... 6 Regional Economic Dependency on the Tier 1 Area ...................................... 7 Employment ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Gross Product ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Personal Income ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION
    2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ports 2017-2018 Capital Program: Project Summaries
    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports
    Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports Interim Report to the 85th Legislature November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAIRMAN'S LETTER………………………………………………………………. 2 REPORT SIGNATORIES…………………………………………………………….. 3 COMMITTEE COMPOSITION AND PROCEEDINGS……………………………. 4 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY……………………………………………………. 5 ISSUES AND FINDINGS……………………………………………………………...17 RECOMMENDATIONS ……………………………………………………………...21 1 Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports November 18, 2016 Dear Members and Fellow Texans: Enclosed is the interim report for the Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports, commissioned by Lt. Governor Patrick. I would like to thank him for his attention to these essential waypoints of the Texas economy and for the privilege of chairing the Committee. In the past months, my Senate colleagues and I have studied our state’s port assets (both coastal and inland hubs) and paid particular attention to the economic impact of the Panama Canal expansion. We have arrived at a number of conclusions on the matter of what our state’s economy must do to compete and grow. Thanks to the tireless efforts of this committee and the enthusiastic support of port authorities across the state, we have a much clearer picture of the unique role Texas ports play in our state’s economy. They are indispensable gateways to trade and economic growth which have fueled our state’s rise to the top ranking among America’s exporting states. That ranking is reflective of our ports’ ability to handle more than 20 percent of our nation’s total export tonnage. As improvements to the Panama Canal create a flow of larger vessels from distant trading partners, we must ensure Texas ports are equipped to sustain our economic leadership role.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Port Mission Plan: Investment Strategy
    PORT AUTHORITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN: INVESTMENT STRATEGY 86TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN: INVESTMENT STRATEGY 86TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION TABLE OF CONTENTS Project cargo at the Calhoun Port Authority. Letter From the Chairwoman ..................................... ii The Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC) ..... iii Mission ...................................................................... iii Purpose ........................................................................ 1 Statewide Impact ...................................................... 1 Port Investment is a Statewide Growth Strategy .... 2 Capital Investment ..................................................... 2 Resiliency .................................................................. 2 Types of Port Facilities ............................................... 4 Barge moving cargo near the Port of Harlingen. Port System Overview ................................................ 6 How the Port System Works ...................................... 8 Waterways ................................................................. 9 Port Facilities ............................................................. 9 Inland Connectivity .................................................... 9 Port Capital Program ............................................... 10 Ship Channel Improvement Report ...........................11 Port Connectivity Report...........................................11 Planned Port System
    [Show full text]
  • Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook
    TTI: 0-6890 Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook Technical Report 0-6890-P1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6890-P1.pdf PORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION REINVESTMENT ZONE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDEBOOK by: Rafael M. Aldrete Abhisek Mudgal Senior Research Scientist Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Sharada Vadali Juan Carlos Villa Associate Research Scientist Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Carl James Kruse Lorenzo Cornejo Research Scientist Assistant Transportation Researcher Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute David Salgado Deog Sang Bae Associate Transportation Researcher Graduate Assistant Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Product 0-6890-P1 Project 0-6890 Project Title: Tools for Port TRZs and TRZs for Multimodal Applications Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation Published: March 2017 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this product reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS of LACK of MAINTENANCE DREDGING of the HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010
    DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF LACK OF MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010 Prepared by CENTER FOR PORTS AND WATERWAYS TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE 701 NORTH POST OAK, SUITE 430 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77024‐3827 for PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND PROJECT APPROACH .................................................. 1 Phase 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Phase 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 6 CATEGORY 1: LIGHT LOADING ........................................................................................... 10 Selection and Data Acquisition ................................................................................................. 10 Valuation ................................................................................................................................... 13 CATEGORY 2: PARTIAL DISCHARGE AT WOODHOUSE TERMINAL ........................... 17 Selection and Data Acquisition ................................................................................................. 17 Valuation ................................................................................................................................... 17 CATEGORY
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Houston Authority Tariff No. 14
    Port of Houston Authority Tariff No. 14 February 1, 2021 Additional Rates, Rules, and Regulations Governing the Fentress Bracewell Barbours Cut Container Terminal EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 111 East Loop North - Houston, Texas 77029 USA P. O. Box 2562 - Houston, Texas 77252-2562 Phone (713) 670-2400 - Fax (713) 670-2564 Barbours Cut Container Terminal 1515 East Barbours Cut Boulevard – La Porte, Texas 77571 Phone (281) 470-1800 - Fax (281) 470-5580 PORT OF HOUSTON TARIFF NO. 14 Page No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE: DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS SUBJECT SUBRULE PAGE NO. Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 048 ......................................... 11 Agent or Vessel Agent ............................................................................................. 001 .......................................... 6 Baplie ....................................................................................................................... 002 ........................................... 6 Berth ......................................................................................................................... 003 ........................................... 6 Bonded Storage ....................................................................................................... 004 ........................................... 6 Checking .................................................................................................................. 005
    [Show full text]
  • Range Transportation Plan 2035 Executive Summary
    TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Texas Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan 2035 Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction and Overview 5 Our Transportation System and Its Importance to our Future What is the Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan? ....................................................................... 6 How was the Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan Developed? .............................................6 Future Trends and Challenges (2010–2035) 7 How Are We Changing and What Will Be Our Future? Demographic and Economic Changes ............................................................................................................. 7 Freight changes ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Infrastructure Maintenance Needs Are Growing ........................................................................................ 8 The Environment ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Technology Changes................................................................................................................................................ 9 Our Transportation System – Now and in the Future 10 What Makes Up Our System and What Are the Future Demands? Moving People ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Port Services
    Port Services LJA Engineering 713.953.5200 Houston Dallas LJA.com Alice Deer Park Arlington East Houston Austin Galveston Beaumont Katy Cedar Park San Antonio College Station Spring Conroe The Woodlands Corpus Christi Jacksonville, FL Port Services Projects • GT Logistics Crude Oil Terminal, LJA Engineering is a multi-discipline consulting engineering Port Arthur, Texas firm serving both local and international private and public • New Liquids Terminal Dock, sectors for over 45 years, with a specialty focus on offering Port of Texas City, Texas efficient solutions in midstream infrastructure design. Our understanding of integrated transportation and storage • Port Arthur Valero Refinery Joint operations, experience in terminal development for marine, Outfall Canal Access Bridge, Jefferson County, Texas rail, and truck terminals, and knowledge of pipeline facilities set us apart. • Dock Inspection Program for Port of Texas City, Texas City, From capacity improvements to greenfield design, Texas LJA provides comprehensive engineering services • Lynchburg Ferry Hurricane for port and terminal capital projects. Harvey Emergency Repair, LJA’s staff of over 700 professionals thrives on challenging Harris County - Precinct 2, Texas projects and designing new solutions for our clients. • Sabine Pass Port Authority Our engineers are well versed in designing port projects, About Us Port Expertise Resources L-Dock, Sabine Pass, Texas meter and pigging stations, terminal piping, pipe racks, LJA is a full service consulting We offer multi-disciplinary
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary March 2017
    Executive Summary March 2017 By Ani Turner, Altarum Institute The Business Case for Expanding Opportunity and Equity in Texas: Race, Income, and Economic Growth Changing Composition of Texas Working Age Population 2015 2050 54% 43% 39% Educational achievement past high school would increase state earnings by more than already lags behind employer demand. 50 percent, or $335 billion, increasing Texas 26% Businesses in Texas import more than economic output by nearly $2 trillion – an 90,000 people with a post-secondary increase that is more than the current GDP of 7 12% 10% 9% education each year from outside the state. Canada, Australia, Korea, Spain, or Mexico. 6% By 2020, 62 percent of jobs in Texas are Higher earnings mean more spending on expected to require some post-secondary goods and services. A $182 billion increase 8 White Black Hispanic Other education. Today, 61 percent of White, 52 in earnings would mean about $18 billion percent of Black, and 37 percent of more in food purchases, $5 billion in apparel Hispanic adults in Texas have some and services, $24 billion in cars, gas, and The Texas working age 9 With low taxes and costs of living, educational attainment, fewer employment post-secondary education. As Hispanics transportation expenses, and $7.4 billion in population (age 18-64) is 13 a friendly business climate,1 and ample opportunities, and less financial security become a larger share of the workforce, the entertainment. By 2050, closing earnings projected to grow by 6.8 land and natural resources, the Texas than the average White child.4 As today’s shortfall in educational credentials will gaps would be associated with $34 billion million people, a growth economy has been growing faster than the children of color become the majority adult increase unless these achievement more in food, $9 billion in apparel and of more than 40 percent, national average for the past four decades.
    [Show full text]