Open Letter About Global Political, Monetary and Financial Manipulation – from the Perspective of One Judge
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Open letter about global political, monetary and financial manipulation – from the perspective of one judge To: Organization of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, The WorldBank, TheWorld Health Organization, adhesive, judicial and executive organs, and citizens of all countries of the World „Look at us. It's all twisted up, it's all upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy law, schools destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the mainstream media destroy information, and religions destroy spirituality.“ Michael Ellner, American writer (1949 – 2018) ... Article 19. General Declaration of Human Rights Everyone has the right to freedom of thought and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. ... Introduction The immediate cause of this address to the professional, media and general public is the situation regarding the pandemic caused by the alleged Covid-19 disease. The pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization back in March this year, but it reportedly continues for more than eight months, and which is even worse, the indications and announcements are being louder that its duration could be extended for at least two, three or more years. Since the beginning of the declaration of this pandemic, many scientists and experts from medical, legal and other professions have emerged, which have cast doubt not only on the existence of the pandemic, but also all, or certain measures, recommendations and activities that have come from the World Health Organization, as well as from the competent state bodies and their professional bodies ( so called "crisis headquarters"). 2 These numerous and increasingly powerful voices present an abundance of professional, serious and logical arguments, many of which are based on professional, scientific and other studies, research and observations, claiming that the measures taken so far, which are orchestrated around the world in connection with this pandemic, severely damage the mental and physical health of the entire population, especially children, the elderly and sick people, and that all people are unjustifiably, disproportionately and even unreasonably, deprived, restricted or denied some of the most important human rights. Therefore, it is strange that the appeals of these numerous experts are persistently ignored and neglected not only by official professional bodies and other state bodies in almost all countries of the world, but, even more strangely, by almost all global and local media. Intolerance to their criticism and opinions is present not only in television, news and other social media, but also on the Internet, video channels and all social networks. This unwarranted, unreasonable and orchestrated boycott could be one of the reasons why current events could serve as a strong reason for the scientific, professional and wider public in all countries to finally pay much greater attention to the most controversial issues and problems concerning the existence of the world pandemic. Even more importantly, it seems the need to finally review the increasingly vocal claims and writings of a multitude of individuals and groups who, rather argumentatively, claim that current and future developments regarding this virus are planned in advanced by a small group of individuals and conducted through influential individuals in the World Health Organization, state and international bodies and organizations, and that all this is happening as a part of a secret combat against all of humanity. Based on the current world events and certain facts, as well as the data and information to be presented below, it seems that Ilenro's claims of the upside of the present World could be confirmed in all its bitter veracity. And what's worse, it seems that analysis of some significant events over the last 100 years or so suggests the possibility that, behind the terrible upside and degeneration of almost all knowledge and social values, there is a small group of financial oligarchs who organized the largest criminal organization in the world; which includes the owners and managers of the largest banks and other financial organizations and institutions, owners and executives of national and international corporations from almost all fields (especially in the field of information and other modern technologies), politicians, scientists, lawyers, 3 doctors, media, governmental and NGOs, and many other individuals which, for some of its main objectives, has: 1. financial destruction of the entire world economy, 2. biological destruction of most of humanity, 3. structural destruction of all national states and 4. organizing one world state, which would be completely under their control, in which the rest of humanity would be transformed into chipping and programming robots. Observed from the standpoint of deprivation and restriction of some of the most important human rights and freedoms, undertaken in connection with the alleged pandemic of the alleged covid-19 disease, the situation is becoming more serious, dramatic and uncertain by the day, which is why many see it as the worst state terror and the greatest crime against humanity in the entire history of mankind. Therefore, it seems, it is the right time to initiate broader scientific and professional discussions in all the most important structures that may influence the final positive outcome of these events (legal, political, sociological, medical, media and others). In order to make the questions concerning human rights clearer and more understandable, the following provides an author's review of several of the most important legal questions that can help answer this scourge. These are the questions to which, interestingly, neither in theory nor in practice, there still aren't generally accepted answers: What is law? What is justice? What are "positive" and "natural" laws? How does law apply properly (fairly, justly)? What is law? The general notion of law is greatly unknown, because neither in legal theory nor in the philosophy of law, there is a generally acceptable definition of that concept. 4 Although Kant once pointed out that lawyers "are still seeking a definition for their concept of law", it seems that this seeking is still going on (although there seems to be fewer and fewer such seekers). Nowadays, the general notion of rights is usually defined as a set of all regulations and rules governing various states, relationships and behaviors. However, this definition is more suited to the definition of the term "legal system" or the term "positive law", but neither is the same as the law. In addition, such a definition of law is concretised as a set of human rights and other regulations, which, if they are not just cannot constitute a right, but a non- right, i.e. unjust (bad or inappropriate) laws. From such a definition, the goal of law is also dropped, which is probably the most important feature of the term, by which the right differs from what we might call wrong. The main goal, and the most important characteristic of rights, is to establish or maintain justice which is why regulations and rules that do not establish and maintain justice, or that establish or sustain injustice, cannot be considered a law. Therefore, the general notion should be tied to the general notion of justice, and thus the law could be defined as an instruction, the instruction that individuals and groups are referred to, directed and guided towards socially acceptable acts and behaviours, i.e. behaviour that establishes or maintains justice. According to this definition, law represents a specific type of knowledge, i. e. knowledge about establishing, maintaining in the functioning of justice, which teaches knowledge to individuals and groups in a society about action and behavior that respects the rights of other individuals and groups. Therefore, in short, the general notion of entitlement could be presented as a manual for the conduct of justice. In this way, the adoption of laws and other regulations could be seen as an attempt by the legislative authorities, to extract, revive and concretise those rules that best explain and point to fair action and behaviour in a particular society from the abstract and ideal source of law. Since people do not have absolute knowledge of everything necessary to prescribe a law that properly regulates certain rights, the quality of the law determines the general level of knowledge of the law and justice that currently exists in those who make laws. 5 If the right is such that it really encourages and enables just action and behaviour, which for individuals and society produces good and desirable consequences, then it is a true, natural or divine law, or something that is close to that. What is justice? Here we come to a new and even bigger problem, since the general notion of justice is even more complex and abstract than the notion of laws, which makes defining justice an even more difficult and complex job than defining laws. Justice is an activity (action , act or behavior) that in certain social situations is given, permitted or approved to members of society by certain regulations and rules, and by which activity in social relations they establish or maintain order, peace and harmony, and thus happiness and satisfaction. Unlike law, which is essentially passive and in itself an inactive principle (rule, instruction, norm), justice is always active and acting, and operates by applying the abstract law to concrete situations and relationships. In the legal area, this type of action is conducted through judicial, but also through legislative and executive bodies, although it exists in other social areas, which are not regulated by specific laws, such as friendly, fun, sports and other relations. Thus, justice could, to put it simply, be defined as an activity that applies law, and by which social relations establish or maintain their order, peace and harmony, i.