DOCSLIB.ORG

Bog Znaet: the Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bog Znaet: the Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 By Bog znaet: The Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 By Thomas Henry James Dyne A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, chair Professor Eric Naiman Professor C. Namwali Serpell Spring 2019 Bog znaet: The Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 © 2019 By Thomas Henry James Dyne 1 Abstract Bog znaet: The Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 by Thomas Henry James Dyne Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair This dissertation examines how the narratives of Ivan Turgenev, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and Lev Tolstoy grapple with the consequences of their omniscience. Their narrators do not simply read minds and tell stories; they also become wrapped-up in the ethical implications of telling stories that require the reading of minds. In effect, they ask: what happens when narrators become godlike? Does the privilege of omniscience define—or disrupt—the novel’s ethical value? I argue that the phrase “God only knows” [Bog znaet] becomes the constant refrain of realist narrative, a performance of authority in the moment of divesting from it. In a series of close readings—from Turgenev’s early Sketches of a Hunter to his novel Fathers and Sons, from Dostoevsky’s first work Poor Folk to his late story “The Meek One,” and from Tolstoy’s earliest semi-autobiographical narrative experiments to the trilogy of novels Childhood, Boyhood, and Youth—I argue that the newly omniscient Russian narrator draws attention to the consequences of his gaze, highlighting the existence of a boundary in the moment he makes a display of crossing it, making sacrosanct the interior of the other in the process of laying it bare. These narratives of Turgenev, Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy become deeply concerned with the troubling effects of their increasingly privileged intrusion into the minds of others and, in making us ever aware of the ethical consequences of reading the face to access the mind, cast a spotlight back onto our reading of them. Recent works of literary criticism—from rhetorical humanists championing the value of literature to deconstructive examinations of the ethics of reading—investigate the intersection of narrative and ethics in the novel. This dissertation brings Russian narratives of the mid nineteenth-century into this conversation, which has not yet been done by Slavic scholars. Building on recent theories of narrative ethics and omniscience, this dissertation argues that an awareness of the transgressive nature of privileged knowledge becomes clearly manifest in realist prose, even when hidden feelings and unspoken thoughts are rendered legible. These works reckon with—and invite us to attend to—the troubling effects of their increasingly privileged intrusion into the minds of others. Turgenev’s, Dostoevsky’s, and Tolstoy’s narratives rely on strategies of representation that mark themselves as instances of self-aware transgression, defining their own devices of omniscience as an ethically fraught process, caught up in the problem of making knowable what “God only knows.” i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….1 Chapter 1 “What has happened inside this man?”: the ethics of penetrating the body of the other in Turgenev’s narratives 12 Chapter 2 “That’s the horrible part: I understand everything!”: the ethics of misreading the other in Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk and “The Meek One 43 Chapter 3 “I read what I ought not to know”: the ethics of overreading in Tolstoy’s early narrative omniscience 73 Epilogue…………………………………………………………………………………….…..110 Works Cited………………………………………………………………………………….....113 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I have to acknowledge the great debt I owe to Irina Paperno, Eric Naiman, and Namwali Serpell – I could not have asked for a better, more attentive, and more encouraging committee. Thanks, too, to Dorothy Hale, for many long and illuminating discussions of narrative ethics, as well as to the rest of the faculty of the Berkeley Slavic Department, particularly Harsha Ram and Luba Golburt for their help as graduate advisers and as readers of early drafts of the papers and exam responses that would plant the seed of this dissertation. Thanks also to Anna Daniilovna Muza, without whose support and wisdom I could not have gotten through my last years of teaching Russian. Дай Бог здоровья вам, и генеральский чин. I must also thank and acknowledge the help and support of the Russian department at New York University, particularly that of Ilya Kliger, who, in giving me my first bad grade in a literature class (for trying to make up for a lack of an argument with plot summary), started me on the journey of close-reading some fifteen years ago; of Michael Kunichika, for convincing me to go to Berkeley in the first place; of Yanni Kotsonis, whose classes first made me want to become a Slavicist; of Eliot Borenstein, for giving me my first job as a college instructor; and of Irina Belodedova, for all her help navigating the early years of learning Russian. I owe so much to my wonderful cohort of colleagues and friends—partners—at the Berkeley Slavic department and beyond. I love you, Dave. And finally, thanks does not sufficiently do justice to what I owe my parents, Eileen Kennedy, James Dyne, and Mary Ann Dyne, for their constant care and support. 1 Бог знает, где бродили его мысли, но не в одном только прошедшем бродили они: выражение его лица было сосредоточенно и угрюмо, чего не бывает, когда человек занят одними воспоминаниями. “God only knows where his thoughts wandered, but they did not wander only into the past: the expression of his face was concentrated and sullen, which does not happen when a man is absorbed solely in his memories.” Fathers and Sons, Chapter IV (8:211)1 INTRODUCTION I. Бог знает What happens when narrators become godlike? Does narrative omniscience, with its penetrating gaze and access to the privileged knowledge of character interiors, define—or disrupt—the novel’s ethical value? The narratives of Ivan Turgenev, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and Lev Tolstoy are intensely concerned with these problems. Their narrators do not simply read minds and tell stories; they also become wrappeD-up in the ethical implications of telling stories that require the reading of minds at all. But how is an awareness of the ethical problem of knowing someone too well—of “getting” their story and fixing them in words—possibly made manifest in the tradition of Russian realist novelistic narrative, where even consciousness, unspoken feelings, and private thoughts are rendered knowable? It would seem that nineteenth-century novelistic narrative’s greatest trick—accessing interiority and, in Dorrit Cohn’s terms, making the minds of other people transparent, such that we know the characters of novels better than we could ever know each other—also engenders its most significant ethical consequences.2 In the epigraph above, the narrator of Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons [Отцы и дети, 1862] defaults before God’s knowledge of his characters, begging not only ignorance, but also the very impossibility of such privileged knowledge at all. Although the narrator has just checked in on all the novel’s other main characters, peering into their bedrooms and detailing their mental states with ease, here he insteaD notes the visible illegibility of Pavel Petrovich’s thoughts: while “God only knows” their content, their direction is clearly to be seen in the expression of his face. This narrative voice, despite paying lip-service to the impenetrable sanctity of the character’s mind, in the same breath still breaks this boundary, narrating Pavel Petrovich’s thoughts by reading his face, unquestionably certain in the knowledge of which expressions correspond to which interior states. Turgenev’s narrator here attests to the unknowability of the character’s mind in the same sentence that makes it self-evident. 1 Translation aDapteD from RicharD Hare’s (1948). 2 Cohn asserts that this contraDiction lies at the heart of fictionality: the “most real” literary characters are “those we know most intimately, precisely in ways we could never know people in real life,” while the verisimilitude at the center of literary fiction relies on the communication and representation of the incommunicable anD unrepresentable. Dorrit Cohn, Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1978), 5-7. 2 This moment, I argue, lays out the antinomies central to the development of narrative omniscience in the mid-nineteenth-century Russian novel. Just as the character’s thoughts are at once legible and illegible, his mind made inviolable in the moment it is also violateD, so too is narrative authority defined by an anxious flitting between two opposites. The narrator divests his gaze of any penetrative insight (“God only knows where his thoughts wandered”) in the same sentence that he relies on it (“but they did not wander only into the past”). The narrative is aware of these contradictions, and draws attention to them. I argue that “God only knows”3 indexes the way Russian narratives of the mid nineteenth-century grapple with the consequences of their nascent omniscience. With the constant refrain of “God only knows”—the bellwether of a larger process of disavowing privilege in the moment of relying on it—Turgenev’s, Dostoevsky’s, and Tolstoy’s narrative voices make visible the work of their omniscience, as well as make known their anxiety over its effects. By attending to the consequences of the act of narratively penetrating the mind of the other, making difficult to cross a boundary that they cross all the same, these early omniscient narratives take the shape of an ethically-invested reckoning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War and Peace
    WAR AND PEACE Instructor: Prof. Ingrid Kleespies Email: [email protected] Office Hours: T, W 2:00-3:00pm & by appt. Office: 328 Pugh Hall Vasily Vereshchagin, "Return from the Petrov Palace," 1895 Course Description From the battlefield to the ballroom, Tolstoy's epic novel of life in Russia at the beginning of the nineteenth century is a profound meditation on the causes of war, the nature of social relationships, the poles of human suffering and love, and, perhaps most importantly, the nature and meaning of history itself. In this course we will read War and Peace closely in its entirety. We will examine the origins of the novel in Tolstoy's early writing and consider the historical, political, and social contexts, both of the events described (the Napoleonic Wars) and the period fifty years later in which Tolstoy wrote War and Peace. We will address some of the following questions: Is War and Peace a novel? How does Tolstoy's obsession with the theme of history shape the text on a variety of levels? What do various adaptations of the novel tell us about its reception at different historical moments? Finally, how might War and Peace be relevant to our own moment in history? General Education Objectives This course will provide students with an opportunity to explore the interrelationship between literature, art, and national identity. In so doing, it is designed to fulfill General Education distribution requirements in the categories of “Humanities” (H) and “International” (N). The content of the course draws students’ attention to the values, attitudes, and norms that shape Russian culture (N).
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy's Short Fiction, Ed. by Michael R. Katz
    BOOK REVIEWS: Michael R. Katz, ed. Tolstoy's Short Fiction. New York: W.W. Norton & co., 1991. 503 pp. Like Homer, Tolstoy is homo duorum librorum. But if the hazards of transmission prevented even the Roman world from knowing more of Homer's creation, except by wistful hypothesis, Tolstoy's legacy beyond the two epics is bounteous and diverse, disengaged from the shadow of the major works while yet offering, as Homer's lost Margites apparently did, a commentary on them. outside the novels, Tolstoy's stories comprise the amplest and the most influencial body of fiction he produced. Like his admired predecessor, Tolstoy gave us a long work about society in the moment of finding its heroes, and a comparable study of society disconnected from heroism and the means of achieving it. The stories, in contrast, tend to deemphasize the dialectic between polis and person. Characters more often observe themselves than others, and the intense moments of bearing witness from which characters in the novels profit--Levin seeing his brother die, Pierre watching the downfall of his wife--are presented to the reader undigested by a second textual consciousness which the narrator esteems. This lack of a significant internal audience to action creates a fiction very different from War and Peace and Anna Karenina. The connection which Tolstoy believed art must demonstrate between people is demonstrated between reader and text. Michael Katz's Norton critical Edition brings together much of Tolstoy's best short fiction: "Sevastopol" (December, May), "Three Deaths," "Family Happiness," "God Sees the Truth, But Waits," "The Death of Ivan Ilych," "The Three Hermits," "The Kreutzer Sonata," "Master and Man," and "Alyosha the Pot." Except for the last story, translated by S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Idiot, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Alan Myers, William
    The Idiot, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Alan Myers, William Leatherbarrow, Oxford University Press, 2008, 0199536392, 9780199536399, 658 pages. The Idiot (1868), written under the appalling personal circumstances Dostoevsky endured while travelling in Europe, not only reveals the author's acute artistic sense and penetrating psychological insight, but also affords his most powerful indictment of a Russia struggling to emulate contemporary Europe while sinking under the weight of Western materialism. It is the portrait of nineteenth-century Russian society in which a "positively good man" clashes with the emptiness of a society that cannot accommodate his moral idealism. Meticulously faithful to the original, this new translation includes explanatory notes and a critical introduction by W.J. Leatherbarrow. About the Series: For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics has made available the broadest spectrum of literature from around the globe. Each affordable volume reflects Oxford's commitment to scholarship, providing the most accurate text plus a wealth of other valuable features, including expert introductions by leading authorities, voluminous notes to clarify the text, up-to-date bibliographies for further study, and much more.. DOWNLOAD HERE Dostoevsky's The Idiot A Critical Companion, Liza Knapp, 1998, Literary Criticism, 274 pages. This book is designed to guide readers through Dostoevsky's The Idiot, first published in 1869 and generally considered to be his most mysterious and confusing work. The volume .... Persuasion , Jane Austen, 1947, English fiction, 254 pages. The House of the Dead and Poor Folk , Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 2004, Fiction, 446 pages. In "The House of the Dead, Dostoevsky give vent to his perceptions of prison life, writing from his grueling experience in a Siberian camp, and introduces a gallery of boastful ...
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Makin Great Books 291 Five Lectures on Crime and Punishment
    Michael Makin Great Books 291 Five Lectures on Crime and Punishment You may find the following chronology, with links, of use in guiding your study of Dostoevsky’s novel F. M. Dostoevsky -- Chronology through 1866 1821 3 October, born, Moscow. Father -- Mikhail, doctor (son of priest), who had risen through service to acquire noble status; mother of merchant stock. Former Mariinskii Hospital for the Poor, Moscow, where FMD’s father worked as a doctor, at the time of FMD’s birth. 1825 [Death of Alexander I; accession of Nicholas I; Decembrist revolt.] 1826 [Death of Karamzin (born 1766), author of "Poor Liza" («Бедная Лиза», 1792), History of the Russian State (1818-26).] 1830 [Aleksandr Pushkin's Tales of Belkin, «Повести Белкина».] 1831 Dostoevskii family buys small estate at Darovoe, 150 miles from Moscow. 1833 FMD goes away to school. 1834 [Pushkin's "Queen of Spades", «Пиковая дама».] 1836 Death of mother. [Nikolai Gogol' (1809-52) publishes "The Nose", «Нос»] 1837 FMD goes to St Petersburg, enters Academy of Engineers, housed in the Mik- hailovskii Castle. [Death of Pushkin (born 1799), after a duel, partly as the result of a malicious conspiracy.] 1839 Death of father, possibly murdered. 1841 Promoted to ensign. Plans romantic tragedies. [Death of Mikhail Lermontov (born 1814).] 1842 [Gogol' publishes first part of Dead Souls («Мертвые души»), and "The Over- coat" («Шинель»).] 1844 First published work: a translation of Balzac's Eugénie Grandet. Work on Poor Folk. 1845 Completes Poor Folk («Бедные люди»), which is greeted ecstatically (prior to publication) by Nikolai Nekrasov (1821-1877), Dmitrii Grigorovich (1822-1900), and Vissarion Belinskii (1811-1848), leaders of liberal thought and writing, whose enthusiasm guarantees FMD popularity in their literary circles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Short Stories of Dostoevsky Free
    FREE THE BEST SHORT STORIES OF DOSTOEVSKY PDF F. M. Dostoevsky,David Magarshack | 400 pages | 22 Mar 2001 | Random House USA Inc | 9780375756887 | English | New York, United States These Short Fan Fictions Put You In The Story Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky was born in Moscow in This post lists the Best Fyodor Dostoyevsky Novels and short stories. The Best Short Stories of Dostoevsky debut, the epistolary novella Poor Folkmade his name. From this experience came The House of the Dead In he began the journal Vremya Time. Already married, he fell in love with one of his contributors, Appollinaria Suslova, eighteen years his junior, and developed a ruinous passion for roulette. After the death of his first wife, Maria, inDostoyevsky completed Notes from Underground and began work towards Crime and Punishment He died in Raskolnikov, a destitute and desperate former student, wanders through the slums of St Petersburg and commits a random murder without remorse or regret. Raskolnikov imagines himself to be a great man, a Napoleon: acting for a higher purpose beyond conventional moral law. But as he embarks on a dangerous game of cat and mouse with a suspicious police investigator, Raskolnikov is pursued by the growing voice of his conscience and finds the noose of his own guilt tightening around his neck. While his literary reputation rests mainly on such celebrated novels as Crime and Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov, and The Idiot, Dostoyevsky also wrote much superb short fiction. The Double is one of the finest of his shorter works. It appeared in his second published work and is by far the most significant of his early stories, not least for its successful, straight-faced treatment of a hallucinatory theme.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV by Fyodor Dostoevsky
    THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV by Fyodor Dostoevsky THE AUTHOR Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821-1881) was born into a lower middle class family in Moscow, the son of a former army surgeon, and experienced a strict religious upbringing. His education was poor, and at age seventeen he entered a military engineering school that he found insufferably boring. He read voraciously in his spare time, and resigned from the military shortly after graduation to pursue a career as a writer. His first literary effort, Poor Folk, was published in 1845 to widespread critical acclaim. His succeeding efforts received little public attention, though through them he continued to polish his craft. In 1847, he joined one of the many secret societies that abounded in Russia during the repressive reign of Nicholas I. He found it exciting and thought its activities somewhat innocuous, but the czar did not agree. In 1849, Dostoevsky was arrested and, with several others of his circle, sentenced to be shot for sedition. The czar allowed preparations for the execution to continue to the very last moment before commuting the sentence. Dostoevsky was then exiled to Siberia for four years of hard labor, followed by six years as a common soldier in the army. In Siberia, the intense suffering he experienced made a deep impression that was later reflected in his most famous works; in addition, the relationships he developed with his fellow prisoners, most of whom were poor and uneducated, gave him a lifelong appreciation for the downtrodden of society. It was also during his years in Siberia that he was converted to the Christian faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Doc » Tolstoy's Short Fiction: Revised Translations, Backgrounds And
    LOGAFLFHU4 \ Tolstoy's Short Fiction: Revised Translations, Backgrounds and Sources, Criticism (2nd Revised edition) » Book Tolstoy's Sh ort Fiction: Revised Translations, Backgrounds and Sources, Criticism (2nd Revised edition) By Leo Tolstoy, Michael R. Katz, Michael R. Katz WW Norton & Co. Paperback. Book Condition: new. BRAND NEW, Tolstoy's Short Fiction: Revised Translations, Backgrounds and Sources, Criticism (2nd Revised edition), Leo Tolstoy, Michael R. Katz, Michael R. Katz, This Norton Critical Edition presents twelve of Tolstoy's best-known stories, based on the Louise and Aylmer Maude translations (except "Alyosha Gorshok"), which have been revised by the editor for enhanced comprehension and annotated for student readers. The Second Edition newly includes "A Prisoner in the Caucasus," "Father Sergius," and "After the Ball," in addition to Michael Katz's new translation of "Alyosha Gorshok." Together these stories represent the best of the author's short fiction before War and Peace and after Anna Karenina. "Backgrounds and Sources" includes two Tolstoy memoirs, A History of Yesterday (1851) and The Memoirs of a Madman (1884), as well as entries-expanded in the Second Edition-from Tolstoy's "Diary for 1855" and selected letters (1858-95) that shed light on the author's creative process. "Criticism" collects twenty-three essays by Russian and western scholars, six of which are new to this Second Edition. Interpretations focus both on Tolstoy's language and art and on specific themes and motifs in individual stories. Contributors include John M. Kopper, Gary Saul Morson, N. G. Chernyshevsky,... READ ONLINE [ 2.69 MB ] Reviews A top quality ebook and also the font employed was interesting to read.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands
    Out of the Shtetl Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands NANCY SINKOFF OUT OF THE SHTETL Program in Judaic Studies Brown University Box 1826 Providence, RI 02912 BROWN JUDAIC STUDIES Series Editors David C. Jacobson Ross S. Kraemer Saul M. Olyan Number 336 OUT OF THE SHTETL Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands by Nancy Sinkoff OUT OF THE SHTETL Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands Nancy Sinkoff Brown Judaic Studies Providence Copyright © 2020 by Brown University Library of Congress Control Number: 2019953799 Publication assistance from the Koret Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/ Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non- Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecom- mons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the license, please contact Brown Judaic Studies, Brown University, Box 1826, Providence, RI 02912. In memory of my mother Alice B. Sinkoff (April 23, 1930 – February 6, 1997) and my father Marvin W. Sinkoff (October 22, 1926 – July 19, 2002) CONTENTS Acknowledgments....................................................................................... ix A Word about Place Names ....................................................................... xiii List of Maps and Illustrations .................................................................... xv Introduction:
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title From the Elegy to the End of the Novel: Literary Experiences of Emotion Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9hj028km Author Tapp, Alyson Louise Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California From the Elegy to the End of the Novel: Literary Experiences of Emotion by Alyson Louise Tapp A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, Chair Professor Lyubov Golburt Professor Dorothy Hale Spring 2011 From the Elegy to the End of the Novel: Literary Experiences of Emotion © 2011 by Alyson Louise Tapp Abstract From the Elegy to the End of the Novel: Literary Experiences of Emotion by Alyson Louise Tapp Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair Focusing primarily on Russian literature of the nineteenth century, this dissertation explores the dynamic structures of emotional experience that are embodied in and communicated by literary works. Moving from early nineteenth-century elegies, to Pushkin’s novel-in-verse, and to exemplary mature novels of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, the dissertation concludes with the so-called “crisis of the novel” of the 1920s, seen from the perspectives of both Russia and England. Appealing selectively to work on emotions by literary critics, sociologists and philosophers, this dissertation is a contribution to the study of genre and narrative, as well as the individual works it treats.
    [Show full text]
  • M.A. (English) Part-I Semester-Ii Course-Vii
    M.A. (English) Part-I (Semester-II) 82 Course-VII M.A. (ENGLISH) PART-I COURSE-VII SEMESTER-II NINETEENTH CENTURY FICTION LESSON NO. 19 Author : Dr. Sushil Kumar Major Literary Trends/Movements and History of Nineteenth Century INTRODUCTION In 19th century, the novel emerged as the dominant form of Western literature. The novel written in this era set milestones in the development of the genre. The major novelists provided new shape and strength to the genre of novel. They initiated the art of observation and intricacy to the novel form and they have been the source of inspiration for the further coming novelists ever since. Terry Eagleton rightly observes in his book English Novel: An Introduction, “The late eighteenth and early nineteenth century was one of the most fertile, diverse and adventurous periods of novel-writing in English history, as Gothic fiction, romance, regional and national tales Jacobin and anti-Jacobin novels, novels of travel, sentiment, abolitionism and the condition of women, stories of foreign and domestic manners, and works derived from ballad, myth and folk lore, tumbled copiously from the presses. The literary situation was exceptionally fluid, and the realist novel as we know it, crystallized only gradually in this crucible ingredients. Once that novel was up and running, it did not simply suppress these competing forms; on the contrary, it incorporated them, as a glance at the Gothic or romantic elements in, say, the Brontes would suggest” (94-95). Major Literary Trends and Movements : Gothic Novel Etymologically the word Gothic is derived from the northern European tribe Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy's Art and the Art of Reading Tolstoy
    Tolstoy’s Art and the Art of Reading Tolstoy RUSS 551 Instructor: Andrew Kaufman Through close readings of Tolstoy’s short stories, novellas, parables, and sketches, and concentrating on a careful reading of War and Peace, this course is intended to deepen students’ appreciation of the unique poetics and epic vision of one of Russia’s greatest prose writers. While giving consideration to the specific historical and personal context in which Tolstoy wrote, the course will concentrate on the ways in which Tolstoy transforms the ordinary world into extraordinary artistic visions of human life as something mysterious, inexhaustible, and organically unified. Our analysis of Tolstoy’s art will be for the purpose of reconstructing, rather than deconstructing, the author’s artistic worldview. We will attempt to understand each of Tolstoy’s works as complete artistic wholes, in which meaning and method are inextricably linked. Some of the specific themes to be discussed are Tolstoy’s exploration of the human quest for existential meaning and social justice; Tolstoy’s fascination with both the limitations and possibilities of human consciousness; the connection between form and feeling in Tolstoy’s prose; Tolstoy’s technique for recreating the moment-to-moment flow of ordinary experience; Tolstoy’s movement between the micro and the macro perspective, Tolstoy’s interest in what constitutes a “truthful” narrative; and Tolstoy’s tragic-comedic conception of life. In this course we will also sample the rich tradition of Tolstoy scholarship, focusing especially on those scholars and critics whose readings of Tolstoy may be considered works of art in their own right.
    [Show full text]
  • Works by F.M. Dostoyevsky on Drama and Music Stage
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 1 (2014 7) 43-49 ~ ~ ~ УДК 792.09 Works by F.M. Dostoyevsky on Drama and Music Stage Svetlana G. Voitkevich* Krasnoyarsk State Academy of Music and Theatre 22 Lenin Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660049 Russia Received 19.03.2013, received in revised form 18.03.2013, accepted 16.08.2013 This article is devoted to the works by F.M. Dostoyevsky which found original embodiment in Russian music and theatre of Russia in the last third of the XX – early XXI centuries. The research marks historical stages of formation and development of Russian theatre life, reveals the character of each stage in connection with the main tendencies of time. Due to the historical approach it becomes possible to notice the peculiarities of opera genre, the reasons for emergence of certain genres. Moreover, the research presents the difference in interpreting plots by Dostoyevsky in drama and music theatres. It is an attempt to justify the reasons of actual continuity and relevance of the writer’s prose on opera and drama stages in one of the hardest periods in the history of Russia and nowadays. In order to expand № страницы, правый (левый) БЫЛО НАДО the field of research, it also covers a series of operaстолбец pieces, № строки by modern authors which have not been exposed to research yet. Пример KantorV.K. Kantor V.K. С.47 Список, литературы, № 4. Keywords: Dostoyevsky, opera, drama theatre, prose,С.47 music.
    [Show full text]