DOCSLIB.ORG

I-70 Corridor Transit Alternatives Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I-70 Corridor Transit Alternatives Analysis I-70 Corridor Transit Alternatives Analysis July 2007 I-70 TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS JULY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS page 1.0 Purpose and Need..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Proposed Action................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Description of I-70 Corridor............................................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 Land Use and Activity Centers.............................................................. 1-3 1.2.2 Population and Employment ................................................................. 1-4 1.2.3 Travel Market ........................................................................................ 1-7 1.3 Project History................................................................................................... 1-9 1.4 Transportation on the I-70 Corridor................................................................... 1-10 1.4.1 Roadways ............................................................................................. 1-10 1.4.2 Public Transit ........................................................................................ 1-12 1.4.3 Railroads............................................................................................... 1-14 1.5 Transportation Problems and Needs ................................................................ 1-14 1.5.1 Congestion and Decreasing Mobility..................................................... 1-15 1.5.2 Level and Quality of Transit Service ..................................................... 1-21 1.5.3 Limited Access to the Transportation System....................................... 1-22 1.5.4 Need for Sustainable Development ...................................................... 1-22 1.5.5 Effect on Air Quality .............................................................................. 1-26 1.5.6 Financial Constraints............................................................................. 1-27 1.6 Planning Context............................................................................................... 1-28 1.6.1 FTA Planning and Project Development Process................................. 1-28 2.0 Transit Alternatives .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 TSM Alternative................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2.1 TSM Alternative Facilities...................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 TSM Alternative Express Routes .......................................................... 2-3 2.2.3 TSM Alternative Local Routes............................................................... 2-3 2.2.4 TSM Alternative Summary .................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Express Bus Alternative.................................................................................... 2-4 2.3.1 Express Bus Alternative Facilities......................................................... 2-4 2.3.2 Express Bus Alternative Routes............................................................ 2-6 2.3.3 Express Bus Alternative Local Routes.................................................. 2-7 2.3.4 Express Bus Alternative Summary........................................................ 2-7 2.4 Commuter Rail Alternative................................................................................ 2-8 2.4.1 Commuter Rail Alternative Description ................................................. 2-8 2.4.2 Commuter Rail Alternative Station Locations........................................ 2-8 2.4.3 Commuter Rail Alternative Service Concept......................................... 2-11 2.4.4 Commuter Rail Alternative Connectivity................................................ 2-12 2.4.5 Commuter Rail Alternative Equipment.................................................. 2-12 2.4.5.1 Diesel Multiple Units (DMUs) .................................................... 2-13 2.4.5.2 Locomotive Hauled, Bi-Level Passenger Rail Cars .................. 2-14 2.4.5.3 Comparisons of Technologies .................................................. 2-15 2.4.6 Commuter Rail Alternative Supporting Infrastructure............................ 2-15 2.4.6.1 Stations ..................................................................................... 2-15 PAGE TOC-1 I-70 TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS JULY 2007 2.4.6.2 Track and Signal ....................................................................... 2-15 2.4.6.3 Rail/Highway Grade Crossings ................................................. 2-16 2.4.6.4 Layover Facility ......................................................................... 2-16 2.4.6.5 Repair and Maintenance Facility............................................... 2-16 3.0 Downtown Commuter Rail Terminal Evaluation ........................................................ 3-1 3.1 Potential Terminal Locations............................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Kansas City Union Station ................................................................................ 3-1 3.3 Riverfront (Third Street and Grand Avenue) ..................................................... 3-3 3.4 Recommended Terminal Location .................................................................... 3-6 4.0 Transit Alternatives Costs .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Bus Capital and Operating Costs...................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Assumptions for Vehicle and Related Facilities’ Capital Costs................ 4-1 4.1.2 Assumptions for Annual Bus O&M Costs ................................................ 4-1 4.1.3 Alternatives Bus Cost Estimates.............................................................. 4-2 4.1.3.1 TSM Alternative........................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3.2 Express Bus Alternative .............................................................. 4-2 4.1.3.3 Commuter Rail Alternative Bus Service ...................................... 4-3 4.1.4 Alternatives Bus Cost Estimates Summary ............................................. 4-3 4.2 Commuter Rail Capital and Operating Costs.................................................... 4-5 4.2.1 Track and Signals Upgrade Costs ........................................................... 4-5 4.2.1.1 KCS-Proposed Capital Improvements ........................................ 4-5 4.2.1.2 Potential Phasing Plan ................................................................ 4-10 4.2.2 Non-Track and Non-Signal Capital Costs ................................................ 4-13 4.2.2.1 Station Capital Costs................................................................... 4-13 4.2.2.2 Layover Facility Costs ................................................................. 4-14 4.2.2.3 Locomotive Hauled, Bi-Level Passenger Rail Cars..................... 4-14 4.2.2.4 Total Non-Track and Non-Signal Capital Costs Summary .......... 4-15 4.2.3 Total Rail Capital Costs ........................................................................... 4-16 4.2.4 Operations and Maintenance Costs......................................................... 4-16 4.3 Alternatives Cost Estimate Summary................................................................ 4-18 5.0 Ridership Forecasts................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model.................................................... 5-1 5.2.1 Overview of the Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model................. 5-1 5.2.2 Application of the ARRF Model to the I-70 Corridor................................. 5-2 5.2.3 Summary.................................................................................................. 5-10 5.3 Ridership Forecasts.......................................................................................... 5-11 5.3.1 Overview and Summary of Key Assumptions .......................................... 5-11 5.3.2 Assumptions for Commuter Rail Level of Service.................................... 5-13 5.3.3 Discussion of Model Runs........................................................................ 5-14 5.3.4 Summary.................................................................................................. 5-16 6.0 Transit Alternatives Evaluation .................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Comparison to Alternatives............................................................................... 6-1 6.1.1 Ridership.................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1.2 Cost.......................................................................................................... 6-2 6.1.3 Purpose and Need ................................................................................... 6-2 6.2 New Starts Project Evaluation Process............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Love of Ann Rutledge Led Agreement Reachedltoday
    Pumping Machinery ^ 1 1-2 to 11 h. p. Fairbanks Centrifugal Pumps. 4^^ Morse and Atlas ^ Kreuger M ‘^L ^ A W.HMW.J ItjHF /Till -^^6^ /VWW^r ■ glL. ■■—■■- .. _:.. -—..-^__^=ir^„ —-=-i:--=tttt— ,-t ■' ■ .. FEBRUARY rOL. XXXIII No. 223 ESTABLISHED 1892 BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS, FRIDAY, 12, 1926 / EIGHT PAGES TODAY FIVE CENTS A COPY fife.... ---.---___ ■ .. ^ -r-■ .. .. OUR VALLEY *-----: fcPPY south winds have been blow- AUTO FRIGHTENS BABY over the Rio Grande ng Delta the * * * few days. MEXICO ORDERS Love of Ann Led RIVER DRAGGED a sign, as they say. Rutledge MAMA HURLS ins a change in the weather, ELEPHANT; * * * ibly will be followed by a brisk e out of the northwest shortly. TEN PRIESTS TO on FOR BOY I Observer Schnurbusch of the Lincoln to Greatness CAR INTO NEARBY DITCH BODY; d States Weather Bureau tells us somewhere up in northern Colo- (Bv The Associated in Wyoming there’s a disturb- Press.) Dutch East Feb. developing. LEAVE COUNTRY BATAVIA, Indies, TRIES * RESCUE 12.—How a mother rescued listurbance in that district at this elephant her which had been n of the year means weather for baby, frightened lection. by a small Amerrcar, automobile Others Held while the machine and hurled it Brother of Starr who can complain? Eight picked up County into a it to is ir weeks of wonderful weather, ravine, smashing bits, Goes Down Schols Are Instructed related in a here from Attorney een splendid. Gave the potato men story arriving Telok South Sumatra. ;>porunity to get their seed into To Vera Cruz Betong, In Effort to Swim Close; A before dawn round.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln Studies at the Bicentennial: a Round Table
    Lincoln Studies at the Bicentennial: A Round Table Lincoln Theme 2.0 Matthew Pinsker Early during the 1989 spring semester at Harvard University, members of Professor Da- vid Herbert Donald’s graduate seminar on Abraham Lincoln received diskettes that of- fered a glimpse of their future as historians. The 3.5 inch floppy disks with neatly typed labels held about a dozen word-processing files representing the whole of Don E. Feh- renbacher’s Abraham Lincoln: A Documentary Portrait through His Speeches and Writings (1964). Donald had asked his secretary, Laura Nakatsuka, to enter this well-known col- lection of Lincoln writings into a computer and make copies for his students. He also showed off a database containing thousands of digital note cards that he and his research assistants had developed in preparation for his forthcoming biography of Lincoln.1 There were certainly bigger revolutions that year. The Berlin Wall fell. A motley coalition of Afghan tribes, international jihadists, and Central Intelligence Agency (cia) operatives drove the Soviets out of Afghanistan. Virginia voters chose the nation’s first elected black governor, and within a few more months, the Harvard Law Review selected a popular student named Barack Obama as its first African American president. Yet Donald’s ven- ture into digital history marked a notable shift. The nearly seventy-year-old Mississippi native was about to become the first major Lincoln biographer to add full-text searching and database management to his research arsenal. More than fifty years earlier, the revisionist historian James G. Randall had posed a question that helps explain why one of his favorite graduate students would later show such a surprising interest in digital technology as an aging Harvard professor.
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-86-140BR Review of Amtrak's Study of Rail Service Through
    United States General Accounting Office Briefing Report to Congressional Requesters ” April 1986 AMTRAK Review of AMTRAK’s Study of Rail Service Through Oklahoma ill1Ill11IIIll1 II 129775 035;30\ GAO/RCED-86-140BR I ’ UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548 I1F:~OtJHCt:, C~MMIJNITY, NLI FLON~JMIL, [,I Vf LOPMENT April 14, 1986 I,IVISION B-222749 To Congressional Requesters On July 23, 1985, we briefed Representative Bob Whittaker and staff from offices of interested Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri members of Congress on the results of our review of Amtrak's analysis of seven proposed passenger rail routes through Oklahoma. This briefing was in response to a May 30, 1984, request from interested members of Congress that we evaluate the methodologies Amtrak used to analyze the market potential for reinstating passenger rail service through Oklahoma. As we agreed Ft the time of the briefing, this report provides a written summary of our result;. Our work assessed whether the revenue and cost projection models and supporting data bases that Amtrak used for the Oklahoma route analyses reasonably represented actual market conditions and costs for the proposed Amtrak routes. On the basis of our review of the models and data bases, we also evaluated the supportability of Amtrak's conclusions regarding the financial and ridership Qerformance of the seven Oklahoma route options. This report is based largely on information obtained from Amtrak and on interviews with Amtrak officials directly responsi- ble for the development and operation of the revenue and cost orojection systems and data bases we evaluated. Although there were some problems with the documentation of the revenue model and its data bases that precluded us from fully applying appropriate model evaluation methods, the information did allow us to provide iqnificant observations regarding Amtrak's current methodologies or estimating revenues on proposed passenger service routes.
    [Show full text]
  • June 24, 2015 (Public Works Committee)
    PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING June 24, 2015 The Public Works Committee meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mr. Fred Spears, Chair. The following members were present, constituting a quorum: Mr. Richard Collins, Vice Chair; Mr. John Skubal; Mr. Paul Lyons; Mr. Jim Kite; and Mrs. Terry Happer Scheier. Also present were: Mr. David White, Councilmember; Mr. Bill Ebel, City Manager; Mrs. Kate Gunja, Assistant City Manager; Mrs. Tammy Owens, Deputy City Attorney; Mr. Dave Scott, Chief Financial Officer; Ms. Gena McDonald, Assistant Chief Financial Officer; Mr. Anthony Hofmann, Director of Public Works; Mr. Brian Shields, City Traffic Engineer; Mr. Mike Miller, Assistant to the Director; Mr. Richard Profaizer, Maintenance Operations Manager; Mr. Sean Ruis, Public Works Maintenance Supervisor; Mr. Scott McClure, PC Technician; and Ms. Kathleen Behrens, Recording Secretary. Approximately five people from the public were in the audience. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Chair Fred Spears took the Chair’s prerogative of addressing the agenda items out of order. JOHNSON COUNTY TRANSIT UPDATE Mr. Chip Corcoran, president, Renaissance Infrastructure Consulting, 13006 Walmer, spoke on behalf of Johnson County Transit, Transportation Council. He introduced his colleagues, Ms. Alice Amrein, transit administrator, Johnson County, Kansas Government and Mr. Dick Jarrold, vice president regional planning and development, Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (KCATA). Over the last six to seven years, there have been many financial challenges across the country and in Johnson County. A lot of work has been done in the area of trans- portation services in Johnson County during that time. The County assembled the Strategic Transit Action Recommendation Taskforce (START) in 2009 to study transportation services.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Quotations RFQ # 16-7026-25 Ridekc Fare Payment & Customer Information Mobile Application Pilot Project
    Request for Quotations RFQ # 16-7026-25 RideKC Fare Payment & Customer Information Mobile Application Pilot Project Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (KCATA) requests quotes from qualified vendors to provide a fare payment mobile application as a pilot project as specified in Attachment A. Release of this RFQ solicitation does not compel the KCATA to purchase. Submittal of Quotations: Your written quotation must be received no later than Wednesday, October 19, 2016 prior to 2:00 p.m. central time, via fax or email to [email protected] or fax to 816-346-0336. Questions should be directed, in written format, to this email address. Type of Contract: KCATA contemplates award of a firm fixed price contract with regard to price. Period of Performance: The pilot project shall be for a period of date of contract award through one year. Basis for Award: Contract award, if any, will be made on the basis of the lowest responsive bidder complying with all the conditions of the RFQ, scope of work, and instruction. Pricing shall remain valid for 90 days. a. If awarded at all, the bid may be awarded to the bidder whose total price is lowest, whose bid is responsive to the invitation thereof, and who is determined to be technically and financially responsible to perform as required. Conditional bids and any bid taking exception to these instructions or conditions, to the contract conditions or specifications, or to other contract requirements may be considered non- responsive and may be rejected. Minimum Acceptance Period: Ninety (90) Calendar Days Reservations: KCATA reserves the right to waive informalities or irregularities in quotes, to reject any or all quotes; to cancel this RFQ in part or in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soul of Ann Rutledge : Abraham Lincoln's Romance
    LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE FOUNDATION ^^ j,^^^ /yl^ . //Wv^2^^/^ /^.^^2^^ i^^C.e^'^. Digitized by tine Internet Arcliive in 2010 witli funding from Tlie Institute of Museum and Library Services through an Indiana State Library LSTA Grant http://www.archive.org/details/soulofannrutledgOOinbabc THE SOUL OF ANN RUTLEDGE ABBAHAM LINCOLN'S ROMANCE SECOND IMPRESSION " ABRAH.\M, THIS PLACE SEEMS HOLY AND YOU ARE ITS PROPHET Page 276 THE SOUL OF ANN RUTLEDGE ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S ROMANCE BY BERNIE BABCOCK WITH A FRONTISPIECE IN COLOR BY GAYLE EOSKINS PHILADELPHL^ & LONDON J. B. LIPPINCOTT COjMPANY 1919 OOPTHIOHT, I9I9, BT J. B. LIPPDJCOTT COMPANT PRINTED BT J. B. LIPPIWCOTT COMPANT AT THS WASHINGTON SQUABE PEBSS PHILADELPHIA, V. S. A. ToJ AUTHOR'S NOTE In the tremendous output of Lincolniana that has been given to literature, it seems strange that no adequate story has been given of one of the greatest loves in history. Many writers have referred to it and to its moulding power on the lover's after life. Some have thrown sidelights on the character of the woman. Some have mentioned her rare gift of song and her unusual endowment of mind, and one writer has given a careful description of her personal appearance. But so far as careful and exhaustive research shows, all this matter has never been woven into one story. It is also strange that there has been so much controversy regarding the religious views of Abraham Lincoln, and by those whose faith is based on the evidence required by the Great Teacher when He said, '* Ye shall know them by their fruits." Nor should it ever have been taken as an evidence of lack of faith because he did not accept the creedal beliefs of his day, for had not the Christ Himself strenuously denied 7 AUTHOR'S NOTE much that was insisted on in His day, Christian- ity could never have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ann Rutledge in American Memory: Social Change and the Erosion of a Romantic Drama
    Ann Rutledge in American Memory: Social Change and the Erosion of a Romantic Drama BARRY SCHWARTZ A legend of a shining, deathless, holy and pure passion arose, spread, grew by some inherent vital sheen of its own or of the need of those who wanted it, of Ann Rutledge. Carl Sandburg, The Prairie Years Among the many love stories that poetry, biography, film, and drama told during the first half of the twentieth century, that of Abraham Lincoln and Ann Rutledge occupies a special place. Although scholars have argued for decades about the role Ann Rutledge played in Abra- ham Lincoln’s life,1 this essay says nothing about that question; rather, it speaks about the diminished relevance of the question itself. Moving back and forth between images of tragic romance and the changing ethos of American culture, the essay reviews the emergence and diffu- sion of the Ann Rutledge story. It explains why the story evoked strong public interest during the Progressive and New Deal eras, remained popular until the 1950s, then faded as a postindustrial society intensified demands for diversity, inclusion, racial justice, and gender equality. Diminishing popular interest in Ann Rutledge accompanied by rising academic interest raises important questions for scholars of collective memory. A second-cousin of “public opinion,” “collective memory” refers to the distribution throughout society of beliefs, knowledge, feelings, and moral judgements about the past. Only in- dividuals possess the capacity to contemplate the past, but beliefs do not originate in the individual alone, nor can they be explained on the basis of personal experience.
    [Show full text]
  • KANSAS CITY STREETCAR MAIN STREET EXTENSION Project Narrative
    KANSAS CITY STREETCAR MAIN STREET EXTENSION Project Narrative Submitted by Kansas City Streetcar Applicant: City of Kansas City, Missouri Partner: Kansas City Streetcar Authority Partner: Kansas City Area Transportation Authority September 7, 2018 i Kansas City Streetcar Main Street Extension Project Project Narrative Table of Contents 1.0 Project BackgrounD....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Project Partners ............................................................................................................................................ 3 3.0 Project Setting .............................................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Existing Transit Service ...................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Streetcar Service ............................................................................................................... 5 3.1.2 Local Bus Service ............................................................................................................... 6 3.1.3 Intercity Passenger Rail Service ......................................................................................... 7 4.0 Current ConDitions.......................................................................................................................................11 5.0 Project Purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Options for Improving Amtrak's
    U.S. Department EVALUATION OF OPTIONS FOR of Transportation Federal Railroad IMPROVING AMTRAK’S PASSENGER Administration ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-05/06 Final Report This document is available to the public through the National December 2005 Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. This document is also available on the FRA Web site at www.fra.dot.gov. Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Notice The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2005 Final Report December 2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Evaluation of Options for Improving Amtrak’s Passenger Accountability System RR93/CB043 6.
    [Show full text]
  • II. Existing Conditions
    II. Existing Conditions Existing View of the Corridor Zoning Analysis Land Use Analysis Existing Street Sections Capacity and Access Analysis Existing Intersection Analysis Existing Public Parking Analysis PedZoneSM Analysis Existing Alternative Mode Analysis 17 II. Existing Conditions Existing View of Corridor TOWN OF NORMAL TOWN OF NORMAL Illinois State University HARRIS CULLOM CHURCH UNIVERSITY BRADFORD SUMMIT MARION UNIVERSITY BAKEWELL UNIVERSITY BOWLES BELVIEW ORLANDO FAIRVIEW BRADLEY WARREN BAKEWELL OSAGE HALE DRY GROVE DRY GREGORY GRANT LOCUST WILLOW MANCHESTER MCKINLEY 17 MAIN 1 2 MAIN 3 18 MAIN CENTER DALE HOVEY OSAGE DRY GROVE DRY 4 KINGSLEY north RAAB COLLEGE GREGORY HALE Existing Corridor 1 Main Street near Fairview facing south 2 Main Street near Gregory/Bowles facing north 3 Main Street near College facing north The photographs on these pages illustrate the appearance of the Corridor from the perspective of a motorist and a pedestrian. While they focus on the existing condition of the Corridor’s right-of-way, it is easy to see how land use and development impact the overall impression of the Corridor. This section of the document carefully examines the existing conditions of the Corridor, including land use and zoning issues and the configuration, use, and capacity of the Main Street Corridor as a travel route. 9 Center Street near Wood facing south 10 Main Street near Stewart facing north 11 Main Street near Buchanan facing north 12 Main Street near Olive facing north 13 Main Street at Front facing north 18 Main Street:
    [Show full text]
  • “It Would Just Kill Me to Marry Mary Todd”: Courtship and Marriage
    Chapter Six “It Would Just Kill Me to Marry Mary Todd”: Courtship and Marriage (1840-1842) In 1842, Lincoln married Mary Todd, a woman who was to make his domestic life “a burning, scorching hell,” as “terrible as death and as gloomy as the grave,” according to one who knew him well.1 COURTING MARY OWENS Lincoln’s courtship of Mary Todd is poorly documented, but indirect light on it is shed by his earlier, well-documented romance with Mary S. Owens. Born in Kentucky a few months before Lincoln, Mary Owens received a good education at the home of her wealthy father, a planter in Green County.2 She “was very different from Anne Rutledge.” Not only was she older, bigger, better-educated, and raised “in the most refined society,” she also “dressed much finer than any of the ladies who lived about New 1 William H. Herndon, quoted in Michael Burlingame, The Inner World of Abraham Lincoln (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1994), 268. 2 Nathaniel Owens, out “of his deep concern for the education of his children . maintained a private school in his pretentious plantation home, to which came instructors from Transylvania University, Ky., to give instruction to his children and those of his neighbors.” On his 5000-acre plantation he grew cotton and tobacco, which he farmed with the help of two dozen slaves. Notes on Nathaniel Owens, Fern Nance Pond Papers, Menard County Historical Museum, Petersburg, Illinois. According to William B. Allen, Owens “was a farmer of good education for the times, and of a high order of native intellect.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip Reports from 2001-02 • November 9, 2001-Union Pacific
    Trip Reports from 2001-02 • November 9, 2001-Union Pacific Engineering Special • November 11, 2001-Amtrak's California Zephyr detour • February 2, 2002-Iowa City and the Iowa Interstate • February 23, 2002-Kansas City and Argentine Yard and In-between November 9, 2001-Union Pacific Engineering Special For the second time in two weeks, the Union Pacific's last remaining operating Centennial unit, 6936, came through the area on an engineer special. Last week the unit operated from Council Bluffs to Kansas City via Kansas City Junction and the Spine Line. After spending the last week visiting Texas, Oklahoma, and Illinois the train returned to Council Bluffs. The morning began with the train in Peoria. The train operated north on the former Minneapolis and St. Louis line to St. Louis and turned west on the Overland Route at Nelson, IL. Using information from UP's public trace it was determined that the train would arrive in the area around at 2:00pm. Club members Paul Duncan and Clayton Johanson headed east to meet the special at Colo, IA. The two arrived at Colo at 1:30 to red signals. At 2:05 a westbound double stacker led by a UP SD70M passed through at track speed. Five minutes later the special arrived running wrong main. UP 6936 looked slick with its wings as it blasted through town at 70mph, hot on the heels of the double stacker. The time was 2:10pm. Many club members are familiar with the train chasing stories of Duncan and Johanson and this one was no different.
    [Show full text]