Mesopotamian Year Names

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mesopotamian Year Names Mesopotamian Year Names Neo-Sumerian and Old Babylonian Date Formulae prepared by Marcel Sigrist and Peter Damerow LIST OF KINGS The list of more than 2,000 year names which is made accessible here has been compiled as a tool for the dating of cuneiform tablets as well as for supporting historical studies on early bookkeeping techniques. This tool essentially consists of a collection of date formulae in administrative documents as they were used by the scribes in ancient Mesopotamia, and of computer generated indices for a quick identification of incomplete date formulae on damaged cuneiform tablets and of issues and events mentioned in these formulae. The collection covers presently the time period ● from the time of the empire of Sargon ● to the end of the dynasty of Babylon. Access is provided through ● a list of cities and kings, ● a list of words, ● a list of words of the English translation. According to the pupose of this compilation the data formulae as they are presented here do not quote specific texts but are often composite formulae based on several sources. Furthermore it was impossible to give always the numerous variants of some of the year names. In cases of doubt whether the given version adequately represents the textual evidence users should consult the references and the relevant publications on Mesopotamian year names. (A bibliography is currently in preparation and will soon be accessible here.) History of the project The preparation of this electronic tool is an outcome of an unusual and long-lasting cooperation between an assyiologist and an historian of science at intervals over a period of more than 10 years. The data are kept in a database. Originally it was planned to prepare a computer generated publication of these data. Some seven years ago, a preprint of this publication was made available to a small group of interested scholars, including at that time only the year names of the Ur III period and Old Babylonian period. Since then with the addition of year names used in other cities as, for instance, of year names from the Diyala region and of year names found in new publications and on tablets in museums the collection of year names grew tremendously. This fact alone already suggested to use the means of electronic data processing even more than it was intended at that time. The quickly growing facilities of the World Wide Web finally led us to modify our original plans and to provide first of all an online access to the collected data. Acknowledgements and call for participation Through all the years, several persons have contributed to the collection of year names and to the technical realization of electronic data processing. Many colleagues have helped us by making available their notes and the results of their research, or simply by supplying us with new year names to be included. In particular, we have to thank Prof W. W. Hallo and the trustees of the British Museum for their kind permission to publish year names coming from tablets under their curatorship. Collecting Mesopotamian year names is an ongoing project. Readings and Translations have to be improved, and it is likely that also in the future further year names have do be added. Making, nevertheless, the present version accessible should encourage users to sent us critical comments or to provide us with further year names. Marcel Sigrist Peter Damerow Ecole Biblique Max Planck Institute for the History of Science POB 19053 Wilhelmstr. 44 IL - 91190 Jerusalem D-10117 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Last change: 25/09/01 PD Introduction ❍ Agade ■ Sargon ■ Rimusz ■ Naram-Sin ■ Szarkaliszarri ■ King unknown ❍ Lagasz II ■ Ur-Baba ■ Gudea ■ Ur-Ningirsu ■ Ka-ku ■ Lu-gula ■ Lu-Baba ■ Ur-gar ■ Ur-Mama ■ Pirigme ■ Nammahni ■ Ur-abba ■ King unknown ❍ Uruk ED 3 ■ Utu-hegal ❍ Ur III ■ Ur-Nammu ■ Szulgi ■ Amar-Sin ■ Szu-Sin ■ Ibbi-Sin ■ King unknown ❍ Isin ■ Iszbi-Erra ■ Szu-iliszu ■ Iddin-Dagan ■ Iszme-Dagan ■ Lipit-Esztar ■ Ur-Ninurta ■ Bur-Sin ■ Lipit-Enlil ■ Irra-imitti ■ Enlil-bani ■ Zambija ■ Iter-pisza ■ Urdukuga ■ Sin-magir ■ Damiq-iliszu ■ Dadbanaya ■ King unknown ❍ Larsa ■ Gungunum ■ Abi-sare ■ Sumuel ■ Nur-Adad ■ Sin-iddinam ■ Sin-eribam ■ Sin-iqiszam ■ Syilli-Adad ■ Warad-Sin ■ Rim-Sin ■ Rim-Sin II ■ Hammu-rabi ❍ Babylon ■ Sumuabum ■ Sumulael ■ Sabium ■ Apil-Sin ■ Sin-muballity ■ Hammu-rabi ■ Samsu-iluna ■ Abi-eszuh ■ Ammi-ditana ■ Ammi-syaduqa ■ Samsu-ditana ❍ Sealand ■ Ilima-ilum ❍ Kisurra ■ Itur-Szamasz ■ Manabaltiel ■ Szarrasyurrum ■ Ubaya ■ Zikrum ■ King unknown ■ Bur-Sin ■ Ibbi-Szamasz ❍ Kish ■ Yawium ❍ Mari ■ Yahdun-Lim ■ Sumu-Yamam ■ Iszar-Lim ■ Yasmah-Addu ■ Zimri-Lim ■ Hammu-rabi ❍ Manana, Urum ■ Halium ■ Abdi-Erah ■ Manana ■ Naqimum ■ Ahi-marasy ■ Sumu-iamutbala ■ King unknown ❍ Marad, Kazallu ■ Ibni-szadum ■ Sumu-ditan ■ Iamsi-el ■ Alum-pumu ■ Sumu-numhim ■ Sumu-atar ■ Syallum ■ Iahzir-el ■ King unknown ❍ Nippur ■ Hammu-rabi ❍ Sippar ■ Altinu'u ■ Bunu-tahtun-ila ■ Immerum ■ Sin-bani ❍ Uruk OB ■ Alila-hadum ■ Sin-kaszid ■ Sin-iribam ■ Sin-gamil ■ Ilum-gamil ■ Dingir-am ■ ir3-ne-ne ■ Rim-Anum ■ Nabi-iliszu ■ King unknown ❍ Diyala: Esznunna, Tell Asmar ■ {d}Szu-ilija ■ Nur-ahum ■ Kirikiri ■ Bilalama ■ Iszar-ramaszu ■ Usyur-awassu ■ Azuzum ■ Ur-Ninmarki ■ Ur-Ningiszzida ■ Ipiq-Adad I ■ Szarrija ■ Belakum ■ Warassa ■ Ibal-pi-El I ■ Ipiq-Adad II ■ Naram-Sin ■ Ibni-Erra ■ Iqisz-Tiszpak ■ Dannum-tahaz ■ Dadusza ■ Ibal-pi-El II ■ Syilli-Sin ■ King unknown ❍ Diyala: Dhiba'i, Uzarlulu ■ Abi-matyar ■ Sin-abuszu ■ Hammi-duszur ■ Naram-Sin ■ Dannum-tahaz ■ Dadusza ■ Ibal-pi-El II ■ King unknown ❍ Diyala: Szaduppum, Harmal ■ Waqrum ■ Szumahum ■ Bilalama ■ Isztaszni ■ Immerum ■ Hammi-duszur ■ Taram-Urim ■ Ibal-pi-El I ■ Ipiq-Adad II ■ Naram-Sin ■ Ibni-Erra ■ Iqisz-Tiszpak ■ Dannum-tahaz ■ Dadusza ■ Ibal-pi-El II ■ Syilli-Sin ■ King unknown ❍ Diyala: Nerebtum, Ichcali ■ Hadati ■ Iszmeh-bala ■ Sin-abuszu ■ Ikun-pi-Sin ■ Hammi-duszur ■ Ibal-pi-El I ■ Ipiq-Adad II ■ Naram-Sin ■ Iqisz-Tiszpak ■ Dannum-tahaz ■ Dadusza ■ Ibal-pi-El II ■ Syilli-Sin ■ Ibbi-Sin ■ King unknown ❍ Diyala: Tutub, Khafaje ■ Abdi-Erah ■ Abi-matyar ■ Sumuna-jarim ■ Tattanum ■ Hammi-duszur ■ Warassa ■ Yaqim-el ■ King unknown ❍ City unknown ■ Sziqlanum ■ Izi-sumu-abum ■ Adaki Index Back to Babylon Ammi-syaduqa List 1 mu am-mi-sya-du-qa2 Year in which Ammi- (YOS 13 lugal-e {d}en-lil2-le nam- syaduqa the king, Enlil 13, RlA 2 en-nun-na-ni / nam-en-na- having magnified his 189, 249) ni bi2-ib2-gu-la {d}utu- princely lordship, rose gim kalam-ma-ni-sze3 zi- forth steadfastly like the de3-esz ib2-ta-e3-a un sun over his country and szar2-ra-ba si bi2-ib2-sa2- established justice for all sa2-a his people 2 mu sipa sun5-na an {d}en- Year in which (Ammi- (RlA 2 lil2-bi-da-ke4 / {d}en-lil2- syaduqa), the humble 189, 250, bi-da-asz kalam in-ne-da- shepherd of An and Enlil, BBVOT 1 gal2-la (released the debts) lasting 116) on his country 3 mu gibil sza / egir sipa Year after the year in (CT 8 3b; sun5-na an {d}en-lil2-bi- which (Ammi-syaduqa) BM 78733, da-asz kalam in-da-gal2-la the humble shepherd of YOS 13 An and Enlil, (released the 230) debts) lasting on his country 4 mu {d}marduk en gir3-ra Year in which (Ammi- (RlA 2 szu-nir gal-gal-la ku3- syaduqa) brought into (the 189, 252, sig17 ku3-babbar {na4}za- temple) Esagil great BE 6/II gin3-na-ke4 e2-sag-il2-la- emblems made of gold, 120) sze3 in-ne-en-ku4-ra silver and lapis-lazuli for Marduk the strong lord 5 mu {d}en-lil2-la2 en gal- Year in which (Ammi- (RlA 2 la mu-a-ni in-sa4-a syaduqa) for Enlil the 189, 253, {urudu}alan-a-ni masz2 great lord who called him BE 6.2 123) igi-du8-a szu-a an-da-gal2- by his name brought into la u3 alan-a-ni szud3-de3 (the temple) Enamtila his ab-be2-a e2-nam-ti-la-sze3 statue (representing him) i-ni-in-ku4-ra holding an offering lamb in his hand saying prayers 6 mu asz-me i3-mah-a szu- Year in which (Ammi- (RlA 2 nir-ra u4-gim dalla ib2-ta- syaduqa) brought into (the 189, 254, e3-a e2-babbar-ra-sze3 in- temple) Ebabbar MHET 2 ne-en-ku4-ra magnificent sun-disks, 509, YOS emblems shining like the 13 35) light of the day 7 mu dingir-lamma didli-a Year in which (Ammi- (RlA 2 u6-di-da ba-ab-du7-du7-a syaduqa) brought into (the 189, 255, {d}sze3-ri5-da dam mah-a temple) Ebabbar various BM 79777) e2-babbar-ra-sze3 in-ne- protective deities, having en-ku4-ra an awesome look, for Szerida the august consort 8 mu {gisz}dur2-gar ku3- Year in which (Ammi- (YOS 13 sig17-ga-a husz-a-ta ki- syaduqa) brought into (the 408) bad-ra2-a-asz i3-tum2-ma temple) Enamtila a throne u3 alan-a-ni hub2 ab-szu2- made of redish gold, szu2-e-a e2-nam-ti-la-sze3 fitting for a distant place in-ne-en-ku4-ra and a statue (representing him like a messenger) in a running posture 9 mu {d}utu en-na an-ta Year in which (Ammi- (YOS 13 gal2-la alan-a-ni nam-nir- syaduqa) brought into (the 71) gal2-la-a-ni zubi ku3- temple) Ebabbar for sig17-ga-ke4 szu-a an-da- Szamasz the lord who gal2-la e2-babbar-ra-sze3 resides in heaven his in-ne-en-ku4-ra statue (representing him like) a noble holding in his hand the zubi-weapon made in gold 10 mu sipa zi sze-ga {d}utu Year in which (Ammi- (RlA 2 {d}marduk-bi-da-ke4 ur5- syaduqa), the true 190, 258, ra kalam-ma-na / ka-la-ma- shepherd, the obedient BM 79807) na / ma-da-na szu bi2-in- servant of Szamasz and du8-a Marduk, released the debts of his country 11a mu am-mi-sya-du-qa2 Year in which Ammi- (RlA 2 lugal-e igi-gal2 gu-la {d} syaduqa the king, with the 190, 259, marduk lugal-bi in-na-an- great insight which YOS 13 gar-ra bad3-am-mi-sya-du- Marduk his king has given 382;
Recommended publications
  • The Akkadian Empire
    RESTRICTED https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldcivilization/chapter/the-akkadian-empire/ The Akkadian Empire LEARNING OBJECTIVE • Describe the key political characteristics of the Akkadian Empire KEY POINTS • The Akkadian Empire was an ancient Semitic empire centered in the city of Akkad and its surrounding region in ancient Mesopotamia, which united all the indigenous Akkadian speaking Semites and the Sumerian speakers under one rule within a multilingual empire. • King Sargon, the founder of the empire, conquered several regions in Mesopotamia and consolidated his power by instating Akaddian officials in new territories. He extended trade across Mesopotamia and strengthened the economy through rain-fed agriculture in northern Mesopotamia. • The Akkadian Empire experienced a period of successful conquest under Naram-Sin due to benign climatic conditions, huge agricultural surpluses, and the confiscation of wealth. • The empire collapsed after the invasion of the Gutians. Changing climatic conditions also contributed to internal rivalries and fragmentation, and the empire eventually split into the Assyrian Empire in the north and the Babylonian empire in the south. TERMS Gutians A group of barbarians from the Zagros Mountains who invaded the Akkadian Empire and contributed to its collapse. Sargon The first king of the Akkadians. He conquered many of the surrounding regions to establish the massive multilingual empire. Akkadian Empire An ancient Semitic empire centered in the city of Akkad and its surrounding region in ancient Mesopotamia. Cuneiform One of the earliest known systems of writing, distinguished by its wedge-shaped marks on clay tablets, and made by means of a blunt reed for a stylus. Semites RESTRICTED Today, the word “Semite” may be used to refer to any member of any of a number of peoples of ancient Southwest Asian descent, including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews (Jews), Arabs, and their descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Iraq
    Republic of Iraq Babylon Nomination Dossier for Inscription of the Property on the World Heritage List January 2018 stnel oC fobalbaT Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 State Party .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Province ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Name of property ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical coordinates to the nearest second ................................................................................................. 1 Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 N 32° 32’ 31.09”, E 44° 25’ 15.00” ..................................................................................................................... 1 Textural description of the boundary .................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria under which the property is nominated .................................................................................................. 4 Draft statement
    [Show full text]
  • Antologia Della Letteratura Ittita
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PISA Dipartimento di Scienze storiche del mondo antico Giuseppe Del Monte ANTOLOGIA DELLA LETTERATURA ITTITA Servizio Editoriale Universitario di Pisa Aprile 2003 Azienda Regionale D.S.U. - PISA © SEU - Via Curtatone e Montanara 6 - 56126 Pisa - tel/fax 050/540120 aprile 2003 ii SOMMARIO CAPITOLO I. Iscrizioni reali e editti 1-41 a) Iscrizioni dei re di Kusara e Nesa 1. Dalla “Iscrizione di Anitta” 1 b) L’Antico Regno 1. Le “Gesta di Hattusili I” 3 2. Da un editto di Hattusili I 7 3. Dall’Editto di Telipinu 8 c) Il Medio Regno 1. Dagli Annali di Tuthalija I 14 2. Editto di Tuthalija I sulla giustizia 16 3. Dagli Annali di Arnuwanda I 17 4. Editto della Regina Ašmunikal sui mausolei reali 18 d) Il Nuovo Regno 1. Dalle Gesta di Suppiluliuma 20 2. Dagli Annali Decennali di Mursili II 27 3. Dalla Apologia di Hattusili III 32 4. Editto di Hattusili III per i figli di Mitannamuwa 37 5. Suppiluliuma II e la conquista di Alasija 39 CAPITOLO II. Trattati e accordi 43-77 a) Il Medio Regno 1. Dal trattato di Tuthalija I con Šunašura di Kizuwatna 43 2. Da un trattato di Arnuwanda I con i Kaskei 45 3. Preghiera/trattato di Arnuwanda I con i Kaskei 46 4. Lista di ostaggi kaskei da Maşat Höyük/Tapika 51 5. Dalla “Requisitoria contro Madduwatta” 52 6. Dalle Istruzioni ai governatori delle province di frontiera 56 b) Il Nuovo Regno 1. Dal trattato di Suppiluliuma I con Aziru di Amurru 59 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits of Middle Babylonian Archives1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenstarTs The Limits of Middle Babylonian Archives1 susanne paulus Middle Babylonian Archives Archives and archival records are one of the most important sources for the un- derstanding of the Babylonian culture.2 The definition of “archive” used for this article is the one proposed by Pedersén: «The term “archive” here, as in some other studies, refers to a collection of texts, each text documenting a message or a statement, for example, letters, legal, economic, and administrative documents. In an archive there is usually just one copy of each text, although occasionally a few copies may exist.»3 The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the archives of the Middle Babylonian Period (ca. 1500-1000 BC),4 which are often 1 All kudurrus are quoted according to Paulus 2012a. For a quick reference on the texts see the list of kudurrus in table 1. 2 For an introduction into Babylonian archives see Veenhof 1986b; for an overview of differ- ent archives of different periods see Veenhof 1986a and Brosius 2003a. 3 Pedersén 1998; problems connected to this definition are shown by Brosius 2003b, 4-13. 4 This includes the time of the Kassite dynasty (ca. 1499-1150) and the following Isin-II-pe- riod (ca. 1157-1026). All following dates are BC, the chronology follows – willingly ignoring all linked problems – Gasche et. al. 1998. the limits of middle babylonian archives 87 left out in general studies,5 highlighting changes in respect to the preceding Old Babylonian period and problems linked with the material.
    [Show full text]
  • 2210 Bc 2200 Bc 2190 Bc 2180 Bc 2170 Bc 2160 Bc 2150 Bc 2140 Bc 2130 Bc 2120 Bc 2110 Bc 2100 Bc 2090 Bc
    2210 BC 2200 BC 2190 BC 2180 BC 2170 BC 2160 BC 2150 BC 2140 BC 2130 BC 2120 BC 2110 BC 2100 BC 2090 BC Fertile Crescent Igigi (2) Ur-Nammu Shulgi 2192-2190BC Dudu (20) Shar-kali-sharri Shu-Turul (14) 3rd Kingdom of 2112-2095BC (17) 2094-2047BC (47) 2189-2169BC 2217-2193BC (24) 2168-2154BC Ur 2112-2004BC Kingdom Of Akkad 2234-2154BC ( ) (2) Nanijum, Imi, Elulu Imta (3) 2117-2115BC 2190-2189BC (1) Ibranum (1) 2180-2177BC Inimabakesh (5) Ibate (3) Kurum (1) 2127-2124BC 2113-2112BC Inkishu (6) Shulme (6) 2153-2148BC Iarlagab (15) 2121-2120BC Puzur-Sin (7) Iarlaganda ( )(7) Kingdom Of Gutium 2177-2171BC 2165-2159BC 2142-2127BC 2110-2103BC 2103-2096BC (7) 2096-2089BC 2180-2089BC Nikillagah (6) Elulumesh (5) Igeshaush (6) 2171-2165BC 2159-2153BC 2148-2142BC Iarlagash (3) Irarum (2) Hablum (2) 2124-2121BC 2115-2113BC 2112-2110BC ( ) (3) Cainan 2610-2150BC (460 years) 2120-2117BC Shelah 2480-2047BC (403 years) Eber 2450-2020BC (430 years) Peleg 2416-2177BC (209 years) Reu 2386-2147BC (207 years) Serug 2354-2124BC (200 years) Nahor 2324-2176BC (199 years) Terah 2295-2090BC (205 years) Abraham 2165-1990BC (175) Genesis (Moses) 1)Neferkare, 2)Neferkare Neby, Neferkamin Anu (2) 3)Djedkare Shemay, 4)Neferkare 2169-2167BC 1)Meryhathor, 2)Neferkare, 3)Wahkare Achthoes III, 4)Marykare, 5)............. (All Dates Unknown) Khendu, 5)Meryenhor, 6)Neferkamin, Kakare Ibi (4) 7)Nykare, 8)Neferkare Tereru, 2167-2163 9)Neferkahor Neferkare (2) 10TH Dynasty (90) 2130-2040BC Merenre Antyemsaf II (All Dates Unknown) 2163-2161BC 1)Meryibre Achthoes I, 2)............., 3)Neferkare, 2184-2183BC (1) 4)Meryibre Achthoes II, 5)Setut, 6)............., Menkare Nitocris Neferkauhor (1) Wadjkare Pepysonbe 7)Mery-........, 8)Shed-........, 9)............., 2183-2181BC (2) 2161-2160BC Inyotef II (-1) 2173-2169BC (4) 10)............., 11)............., 12)User......
    [Show full text]
  • Marten Stol WOMEN in the ANCIENT NEAR EAST
    Marten Stol WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson ISBN 978-1-61451-323-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-61451-263-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0021-3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Original edition: Vrouwen van Babylon. Prinsessen, priesteressen, prostituees in de bakermat van de cultuur. Uitgeverij Kok, Utrecht (2012). Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson © 2016 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Cover Image: Marten Stol Typesetting: Dörlemann Satz GmbH & Co. KG, Lemförde Printing and binding: cpi books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Introduction 1 Map 5 1 Her outward appearance 7 1.1 Phases of life 7 1.2 The girl 10 1.3 The virgin 13 1.4 Women’s clothing 17 1.5 Cosmetics and beauty 47 1.6 The language of women 56 1.7 Women’s names 58 2 Marriage 60 2.1 Preparations 62 2.2 Age for marrying 66 2.3 Regulations 67 2.4 The betrothal 72 2.5 The wedding 93 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Mesopotamia A
    Table of Contents : 1. Mesopotamia a. Introduction 1-1 (General introduction to Mesopotamia, its geography, topography, civilization, and commerce) b. The Early Dynastic Period: Sumer (to 2316) i. Introduction 1-4 (The discovery of Sumer, cuneiform writing, religion, the ziggurats, art) ii. Sumerian Philosophy and Religion 1-8 (The Sumerian worldview, cosmology, major deities, religious philosophy and practice) iii. Sumerian Mythology 1-12 (Major mythological characters, Sumerian “paradise,” similarities and differences with the biblical accounts) iv. Mesopotamian Creation Stories 1-14 (Sumerian creation accounts, Enuma Elish, comparison to biblical account of creation) v. Gilgamesh and The Great Flood 1-16 (The major Gilgamesh myths, The Epic of Gilgamesh, discovery of the epic, comparison to biblical account of the flood) vi. The End of the Early Dynastic Period 1-18 (Loss of leadership, invasion of the Amorites) c. The Second Dynasty: Akkadian (2334 – 2193) i. Introduction 1-19 (Creation of empire in single ruler) ii. Sargon the Great 1-20 (Birth and early years, ascension, importance in unifying Sumerian world) iii. Rimush 1-21 iv. Manishtusu 1-22 v. Naram-Sin 1-22 (His general greatness and fall) vi. Shar-kali-sharri 1-23 vii. Gudea 1-23 (The invasion of the Gutians, investment in Lagash) viii. Utu-hegal 1-24 d. The Third Dynasty: Ur (2112 – 2004) i. Ur-Nammu 1-24 (Brilliance, military conquests, the ziggurats, their meaning and probable connection with the Tower of Babel) ii. Shulgi 1-26 iii. Aram-Sin 1-26 iv. Shu-Sin 1-26 v. Ibbi-Sin 1-27 (Reasons for loss of power, defeat to the Elamites, beginning of intermediate period, king lists) e.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2 What Is an Amorite?
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/25842 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Boer, Rients de Title: Amorites in the Early Old Babylonian Period Issue Date: 2014-05-28 CHAPTER 2 What is an Amorite? 2.1 The Amorites from the Early Dynastic to the Old Babylonian period 2.1.1 Introduction In the cuneiform script the word for ‘Amorite’ is mostly written in Sumerian as MAR .TU and sometimes spelled syllabically in Akkadian as a-mu-ur-ru-(ú) = amurru (m). 4 These words also indicate ‘The West’ on the compass. 5 In the lit- erature the overlap of these terms is sometimes confusing, because people indicated as MAR .TU could also come from the area to the north east of Baby- lonia, the Jebel Hamrin. The word lacks a convincing etymology. 6 The study of the Amorites goes back a long time because they are already mentioned in the Bible. 7 4 For the lexical occurrences (and the ‘lexical confusion’ with the term Tidnum/Dita- nu), see Marchesi 2006:8 n. 20,:9 n. 23, the CAD A/2:93-94 and most recently Hrůša 2010:471-472. See Streck 2000:26-29 for a discussion of the term MAR .TU , with the com- ments by Charpin 2005/2006:283-284. See Michalowski 2011:106 for proof from the Ur III period that MAR .TU = a-mu-ru-um . 5 Despite this fact it is known that people with Amorite names lived in the area of the Persian Gulf thanks to the excavations at the island of Failaka of the coast of Kuwait.
    [Show full text]
  • Sargon of Akkade and His God
    Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. Volume 69 (1), 63–82 (2016) DOI: 10.1556/062.2016.69.1.4 SARGON OF AKKADE AND HIS GOD COMMENTS ON THE WORSHIP OF THE GOD OF THE FATHER AMONG THE ANCIENT SEMITES STEFAN NOWICKI Institute of Classical, Mediterranean and Oriental Studies, University of Wrocław ul. Szewska 49, 50-139 Wrocław, Poland e-mail: [email protected] The expression “god of the father(s)” is mentioned in textual sources from the whole area of the Fertile Crescent, between the third and first millennium B.C. The god of the fathers – aside from assumptions of the tutelary deity as a god of ancestors or a god who is a deified ancestor – was situated in the centre and the very core of religious life among all peoples that lived in the ancient Near East. This paper is focused on the importance of the cult of Ilaba in the royal families of the ancient Near East. It also investigates the possible source and route of spreading of the cult of Ilaba, which could have been created in southern Mesopotamia, then brought to other areas. Hypotheti- cally, it might have come to the Near East from the upper Euphrates. Key words: religion, Ilaba, royal inscriptions, Sargon of Akkade, god of the father, tutelary deity, personal god. The main aim of this study is to trace and describe the worship of a “god of the fa- ther”, known in Akkadian sources under the name of Ilaba, and his place in the reli- gious life of the ancient peoples belonging to the Semitic cultural circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Arqueologias De Império» Consistem Em 17 Estudos Que Abrangem As Várias Áreas De HVMANITAS SVPPLEMENTVM • ESTUDOS MONOGRÁFICOS Investigação Da Antiguidade
    Estas «Arqueologias de Império» consistem em 17 estudos que abrangem as várias áreas de HVMANITAS SVPPLEMENTVM • ESTUDOS MONOGRÁFICOS investigação da Antiguidade. A partir das fontes bíblicas, propõe-se uma estruturação de ISSN: 2182-8814 categorias e uma organização de semânticas como possíveis caminhos para o entendimento da ideia de «império». Para o caso egípcio, foca-se a problemática da periodização da História Apresentação: esta série destina-se a publicar estudos de fundo sobre um leque variado de egípcia e a terminologia utilizada para a definir. Para o universo dos impérios antigos da temas e perspetivas de abordagem (literatura, cultura, história antiga, arqueologia, história Mesopotâmia, trata-se a emergência da hegemonia paleobabilónica através da análise da arte, filosofia, língua e linguística), mantendo embora como denominador comum os da ideologia subjacente às políticas sociais e militares levadas a cabo por Hammurabi em Estudos Clássicos e sua projeção na Idade Média, Renascimento e receção na atualidade. dois momentos cruciais da história da Babilónia. Para o espaço da Anatólia e do território 58 OBRA PUBLICADA fenício/siro-palestinense, recorre-se a um método que colhe nas narrativas mítico-religiosas COM A COORDENAÇÃO elementos para o estudo das realidades políticas e apresenta-se uma reflexão sobre CIENTÍFICA Imperialismo no mundo colonial fenício. As civilizações e sociedades neomesopotâmicas estão representadas por estudos sobre contextos de violência, acerca de Jeremias e do Breve nota curricular sobre os autores do volume Império Neobabilónico, sobre Nabónido e ainda sobre os diferentes comportamentos dos reis da região relativamente ao culto de Marduk. Podemos também ler textos sobre a Arqueologias Delfim F.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Babylonian Kings
    Appendix II A List of Babylonian Kings Dynasty Name Filiation Date (BC) or Regnal years Sumu-abum 1894–1881 Sumu-la-El 1880–1845 Sabium Son of Sumu-la-El 1844–1831 Apil-Sin Son of Sabium 1830–1813 Amorite Sin-muballit Son of Apil-Sin 1812–1793 Hammurabi Son of Sin-muballit 1792–1750 Samsu-iluna Son of Hammurabi 1749–1712 Abishi Son of Samsu-iluna 1711–1684 Ammi-ditana Son of Abishi 1683–1647 Ammi-saduqa Son of Ammi-ditana 1646–1626 Samsu-ditana Son of Ammi-saduqa 1625–1595 Iliman 60 years Itti-ili-nibi 56 years? Damqi-ilishu 26 years? Ishkibal 15 years Sealand I Shushi 24 years Gulkishar 55 years GÍŠ-EN? 12 years Peshgaldaramesh Son of Gulkishar 50 years Adarakalamma Son of Peshgaldaramesh 28 years Ekurduanna 26 years Melamkurkurra 7 years Ea-gamil 9 years Gandash 26 years Agum I Son of Gandash 22 years Kassite Kashtiliashu I Son of Agum I 22 years Abi-Rattash Son of Kashtiliashu I 8 years? Kashtiliashu II Urzigurumash © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004430921_009 Fei Chen - 9789004430921 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 09:29:36PM via free access A List of Babylonian Kings 203 Dynasty Name Filiation Date (BC) or Regnal years Harba-Shipak Tiptakzi Agum II Son of Urzigurumash Burnaburiash I […]a Kashtiliashu III Son of Burnaburiash I? Ulamburiash Son of Burnaburiash I? Agum III Son of Kashitiliash IIIb Karaindash Kadashman-Harbe I Kurigalzu I Son of Kadashman-Harbe I Kadashman-Enlil I 1374?–1360 Burnaburiash II Son of Kadashman-Enlil I? 1359–1333 Karahardash Son of Burnaburiash II? 1333 Nazibugash Son of Nobody
    [Show full text]
  • Das Gilgamesch-Epos. Neu Übersetzt Und Kommentiert Von Stefan
    9121_BIOR_2006/2-3_02 06-10-2006 13:22 Pagina 272 309 BIBLIOTHECA ORIENTALIS LXIII N° 3-4, mei-augustus 2006 310 (pp. 129-30). The Assyriological reader will also pay close attention to Maul’s treatment of many difficult lines and pas- sages and enjoy numerous new proposals for restorations (Maul is less cautious in this respect than the other German translators). The Commentary noteworthy for its original and thought- provoking exegesis, despite the mass of exegesis in print on the Epic. Some of my favorite passages included Maul’s aeti- ologies, such as to Tablet III, 122-3 (adoption of foundlings) and to Tablet X, 259-65 (crying and playing of animals), as well as comments on humor, for example to Tablet X, 208 (Gilgamesh’s blessing of Utanapishtim), or irony, Tablet XI, 95 (Puzur-Enlil). Difficult explanations are well handled, such as to Tablet XI, 46-7 (the warning of the flood) and to Tablet X, 88 (the Stone Men). No one will agree, of course, with everything Maul says. For example, I still think it is more likely that the wife of the Scorpion-man relents, rather than her husband (Tablet IX, 130). I missed a comment as to why, if Gilgamesh comes out in the East, he feels a north wind in his face as he gets near the end of his run (p. 177); ASSYRIOLOGIE my own idea is that the poet was thinking of the Tigris tun- nel in Armenia. The book is beautifully designed and produced, with pen- MAUL, S. M. — Das Gilgamesch-Epos.
    [Show full text]