DOCSLIB.ORG

II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara II 1 II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara II. ULUSLARARASI TÜRK - RUS DÜNYASI AKADEMİK ARAŞTIRMALAR KONGRESİ THE II. INTERNATIONAL TURKISH - RUSSIAN WORLD CONGRESS ON ACADEMIC RESEARCH ВТОРОЙ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ КОНГРЕСС ПО ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯМ ТУРЕЦКО- РОССИЙСКОГО АКАДЕМИЧЕСКОГО МИРА (UTRAK) 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 Gazi Üniversitesi - Ankara -Sosyal Bilimler- -Social Sciences- ÖZET KĠTAPÇIĞI (ABSTRACT BOOK) ISBN 978-605-7736-24-6 Yayın Editörü Prof. Dr. Osman KÖSE Ankara - 2019 2 II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara Kapak Tasarımı Bülent Polat EriĢime Açıldığı Tarih 2019 Asos Yayınevi 1.baskı Adres: Çaydaçıra Mah. Hacı Ömer Bilginoğlu Cad. No: 67/2-4/MERKEZ/ELAZIĞ Telefon: 0532 643 75 23 Mail Adresi: [email protected] Web: www.asosyayinlari.com İnstagram: https://www.instagram.com/asosyayinevi/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/asosyayinevi/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/Asosyayinevi 3 II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara KURULLAR KONGRE KURULLARI Onur Kurulu Prof. Dr. Refik TURAN, Türk Tarih Kurumu BaĢkanı Prof. Dr. Ġbrahim USLAN, Gazi Üniversitesi Rektörü Prof. Dr. Uğur ÜNAL, Devlet ArĢivleri BaĢkanı Prof. Dr. Musa YILDIZ, Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Mütevelli Heyet BaĢkanı Düzenleme Kurulu Prof. Dr. YaĢar AYDEMĠR, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ali ÇAKMAK, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Cengiz DÖNMEZ, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Necdet HAYTA, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Selma ÜNLÜ YEL, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Olga Yevgenievna KAZMĠNA, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Osman KÖSE, Polis Akademisi Doç. Dr. Dmitri Aleksandrovich ANDREEV, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Emel ĠSLAMOĞLU, Sakarya Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Ġrade MEMMEDOVA, Azerbaycan Ġlimler Akademisi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Tuğba BELENLĠ, Gazi Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Görevlisi, Esra Müjgan KARATAġ, Gazi Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Yasemin ULUTÜRK SAKARYA, Ġstanbul Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Betül Karagöz YERDELEN, Giresun Üniversiteis Öğr. Gör. Serkan YORGANCILAR, Gazi Üniversitesi Bilim Kurulu Doç. Dr. Ismail Alievich AGAKĠSHĠEV, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Ġlkben AKANSEL, Bartın Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Sibel AKOVA, Yalova Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Erdal AKSOY, Hacıbayram Veli Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Krasikova L. ALEKSANDROVNA, Rus Devlet Üniversitesi, Rusya Doç. Dr. Leyla ALĠYEVA, Ağrı Ġbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Nurlan AKHMETOVA, Balasagun Devlet Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Numan ARUÇ, Makedonya Bilimler Akademisi Prof. Dr. Bahri ATA, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. YaĢar AYDEMĠR, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Mesut AYDIN, Ġnönü Üniversitesi Dr. Yevgeni BAHREVSKĠ, Rus Kültür ve Doğa Mirası Enstitüsü, Rusya Prof. Dr. Lev Sergeevich BELOUSOV, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Togay Seçkin BĠRBUDAK, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Leonid Iosifovich BORODKĠN, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Ekrem CAUSEVĠC, Zagrep Üniversitesi, Hırvatistan Prof. Dr. Alishina Khanisa CHAVDATOVNA, Bilimler Akademisi, Tataristan 4 II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara Prof. Dr. Ebru CEYLAN, Ġstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ali ÇAKMAK, Gazi Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Sıddık ÇALIK, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Vedat ÇALIġKAN, Çanakkale 18 Mart Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. hakkı ÇOKNAZ, Düzce Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Yasemin DEMĠRCAN, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Nasip DEMĠRKUġ, Van Yüzüncüyıl Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Sergei Victorovich DEVĠATOV, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Nihada D. DĠANĠÇ, Tuzla Üniversitesi, Bosna -Hersek Doç. Dr. Dilek Temiz DĠNÇ, Çankaya Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Cengiz DÖNMEZ, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. A. Baran DURAL, Trakya Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Nihada DELĠBEGOVĠģ DŽANĠģ, Tuzla Üniversitesi, Bosna –Hersek Prof. Dr. Nejla GÜNAY, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Abdullah GÜNDOĞDU, Ankara Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Demet GÜRHAN, Ankara Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Elmira HABĠBULĠNA, Kazan Federal Üniversitesi, Rusya Prof. Dr. Amira Turbic HADZAGĠC, Tuzla Üniversitesi, Bosna –Hersek Doç. Dr. Çiller HATĠPOĞLU, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Necdet HAYTA, Gazi Üniversitesi Dr. Sajjad HOSSEN, Erdebil Üniversitesi, Ġran Prof. Dr. Cabbar ISAKUL, Bilimler Akademisi, Özbekistan Prof. Dr. Maria IVANICS, Sizegerd Üniversitesi, Macaristan Prof. Dr. Aydın ĠBRAHĠMOV, Ege Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Kemal ĠBRAHĠMZADE, Tokat GaziosmanpaĢa Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Emine ĠNANIR, Ġstanbul Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Ergin JABLE, Kosova Hasan PiriĢtina Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Amina S. JESENKOVIC, Saraybosna Üniversitesi, Bosna Hersek Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Nükhet Eltut KALENDER, van Yüzüncüyıl Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Sergei Pavlovich KARPOV, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Gülün KARABAĞ, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Behset KARACA, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Kamer KASIM, Bolu Ġzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Hamza KELEġ, Gazi Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Kamala KERĠMOVA, Ağrı Ġbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Ulvi KESER, Kıbrıs Amerikan Üniversitesi, KKTC Doç. Dr. Ramil R. KHAYRUTDĠNOV, Kazan Federal Üniversitesi, Rusya Prof. Dr. Güray KIRPIK, Gazi Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Olga KLĠMKĠNA, Ġstanbul Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Bünyamin KOCAOĞLU, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Emina BERBIC KOLAR, Osijek Üniversitesi, Hırvatistan Prof. Dr. Biray KOLLUOĞLU, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Vladimir G. KOġEVAR, Kırgızistan Ġlimler Akademisi, Kırgızistan Doç. Dr. Meliha KÖSE, Gazi Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Elena KRAĠNĠNCHENKO, Pyatigorsk Devlet Üniversitesi / Rusya Prof. Dr. Talip KÜÇÜKCAN, Marmara Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. ġilova N. LEONĠDOVNA, Petrozavodsk Devlet Üniversitesi, Rusya Prof. Dr. Yuri A. MAZEĠ, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Marziye MAMMEDLĠ, Karabük Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Ġrade MEMEDOVA, Ġlimler Akademisi, Azerbaycan 5 II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara Prof. Dr. Sergei Vladimirovich MĠRONENKO, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Anvar MOKOYEV, Kırgız -Türk Manas Üniversitesi, Kırgızistan Prof. Dr. Ġrfan MORINA, PriĢtine Üniversitesi, Kosova Prof. Dr. Ali Engin OBA, Çağ Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Aleksandr Ivanovich OSTAPENKO, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Selahiddin ÖĞÜLMÜġ, Ankara Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Emine ÖZTÜRK, Kafkas Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ayhan PALA, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Elisabetta RAGAGNİN, Freie Üniversitesi, Almanya Prof. Dr. Leila SALEKHOVA, Kazan Federal University Prof. Dr. Flera Sagitovna SAYFULĠNA, Kazan Federal Üniversitesi, Rusya Prof. Dr. Döölötbek SAPARALĠEV, Kırgız-Türk Manas Üniversitesi, Kırgızistan Prof. Dr. Karajaubay SARTKOJAULI, L. N. Gumilev Üniversitesi, Kazakistan Prof. Dr. Yulai SCHAMĠLOGLU, Wisconsin Üniversitesi, ABD Prof. Dr. Anar SALINBAY, Almatı El- Farabi Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Berdi SARIYEV, Ankara Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Gülcan SEÇKĠN, Hacı Bayramveli Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Nemçinova T. SERGEEVNA, Petersburg Devlet Üniversitesi, Rusya Doç. Dr. Oksana Vyacheslavovna SOLOPOVA, Lomonosov Moskova Devlet Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. AĢkın Ġnci SÖKMEN, Ġstanbul Arel Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Muhammed ġAHĠN, Gazi Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Mehmet ġAHĠNGÖZ, Gazi Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Nikolay N. TELĠTSĠĠN, St-Petersburg Devlet Üniversitesi, Rusya Prof. Dr. Sevinç ÜÇGÜL, Erciyes Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Maral TAGANOVA, Milli Yazmalar Enstitüsü, Türkmenistan Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ali ÜNAL, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Aleksandr VASĠLYEV, Rusya Bilimler Akademisi, Rusya Prof. Dr. Frengiz Pasayeva YUNUS, Kafkas Üniversitesi SEKRETERYA Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Tuğba BELENLĠ, Gazi Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Gör. Esra Müjgan KARATAġ, Gazi Üniversitesi Zuhal KOÇ 6 II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara FARKLI ÜLKELERDEN KATILIMCILAR Dr. Fatma AKAY-TÜRKER / Viyana Üniversitesi, Avusturya Tanas Kozma / Antall Jozsef Knowledge Centre, Macaristan AraĢtırmacı, Ilayda Nijhar / UCL, School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES), UK Asst. Prof. Selim Bezeraj, University of Prishtina Kosovo Dr. Anastasiia Zherdieva / independent researcher Doç. Dr. Aleksandr Ivanoich Ostapenko, Moskova State University, Russia Doç. Dr. Andrey Tutorsky, Moskova State University, Russia Prof. Dr. Andrey Volodin, Moskova State University, Russia Assoc.Prof.Dr Leila Salekhova / Kazan Federal University – Kazan AraĢtırmacı Nermin HANMEMMEDOVA / Azerbaycan Milli Bilimler Akademisi Tarih Enstitüsü Prof. Dr. Meruert Musabaeva / Eurasian National University named after L. N. Gumilyov, Kazakaistan Okutman - Gulshara Abiyeva / Eurasian National University named after L. N. Gumilyov, Kazakistan Okutman - Chashina Bibigul Abiyeva / Eurasian National University named after L. N. Gumilyov, Kazakistan Doç. Dr. Ramazanova Nurgul Abiyeva / Eurasian National University named after L. N. Gumilyov, Kazakistan Prof. Dr. Leila Salekhova / Kazan Federal University – Kazan Assoc. Prof. Alexander Novik / Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of the Russian Academy of Sciences Doç. Dr. Yunus Emre Gürbüz / Kırgızistan Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Gökçe Yoğurtçu / Kırgızistan Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi Doç. Dr. Gemer MürĢüdlü / Bakü Devlet Universitesi Doç. Dr. Elvira Latifova / Bakü Devlet Universitesi Öğr. Gör. Aynur Ali ALĠYEVA / Azerbaycan Turizm ve Menecment Üniversitesi, Diller Bölümü, Bakü 7 II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara ÖZETLER ABSTRACTS 8 II. UTRAK, 15 – 17 Kasım 2019 / Ankara Makale id= 62 Sözlü Sunum Ağrı Ġbrahim Çeçen Ünı versı tesı ‟nde Rus Edebı yatı Öğretı mı nı n Önemı Doç Dr Kamala Tahsı n Ağrı Ġbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Özet Ağrı Ġbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi'nin Rus Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü 2011 yılında açılmıĢtır. Bölümümüzde esas olarak aĢağıdaki dersler
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rise and Fall of the 5/42 Regiment of Evzones: a Study on National Resistance and Civil War in Greece 1941-1944
    The Rise and Fall of the 5/42 Regiment of Evzones: A Study on National Resistance and Civil War in Greece 1941-1944 ARGYRIOS MAMARELIS Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy The European Institute London School of Economics and Political Science 2003 i UMI Number: U613346 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U613346 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 9995 / 0/ -hoZ2 d X Abstract This thesis addresses a neglected dimension of Greece under German and Italian occupation and on the eve of civil war. Its contribution to the historiography of the period stems from the fact that it constitutes the first academic study of the third largest resistance organisation in Greece, the 5/42 regiment of evzones. The study of this national resistance organisation can thus extend our knowledge of the Greek resistance effort, the political relations between the main resistance groups, the conditions that led to the civil war and the domestic relevance of British policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Hope U.S
    Killing Hope U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II – Part I William Blum Zed Books London Killing Hope was first published outside of North America by Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London NI 9JF, UK in 2003. Second impression, 2004 Printed by Gopsons Papers Limited, Noida, India w w w.zedbooks .demon .co .uk Published in South Africa by Spearhead, a division of New Africa Books, PO Box 23408, Claremont 7735 This is a wholly revised, extended and updated edition of a book originally published under the title The CIA: A Forgotten History (Zed Books, 1986) Copyright © William Blum 2003 The right of William Blum to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Cover design by Andrew Corbett ISBN 1 84277 368 2 hb ISBN 1 84277 369 0 pb Spearhead ISBN 0 86486 560 0 pb 2 Contents PART I Introduction 6 1. China 1945 to 1960s: Was Mao Tse-tung just paranoid? 20 2. Italy 1947-1948: Free elections, Hollywood style 27 3. Greece 1947 to early 1950s: From cradle of democracy to client state 33 4. The Philippines 1940s and 1950s: America's oldest colony 38 5. Korea 1945-1953: Was it all that it appeared to be? 44 6. Albania 1949-1953: The proper English spy 54 7. Eastern Europe 1948-1956: Operation Splinter Factor 56 8. Germany 1950s: Everything from juvenile delinquency to terrorism 60 9. Iran 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings 63 10.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendices for Covert Regime Change
    Appendices for Covert Regime Change: America’s Secret Cold War Appendix I: U.S.-backed Covert Regime Change Attempts during the Cold War………………2 Appendix II: U.S.-backed Overt Regime Change Attempts during the Cold War………………65 Appendix III: Additional alleged U.S. Covert Cases……………………………………………66 Note to readers: Appendix 1 contains at least 3 sources for each of the alleged regime change attempts conducted by the United States during the Cold War. As time permits, I have been updating the appendices with additional sources and hyperlinks to collections of operational files. Additional sources are available in the footnotes of Chapters 5-8 of the book. Feel free to contact me at [email protected] if you have any additional questions. (Last updated September 2019.) 1 Appendix I: U.S. Covert Regime Change during the Cold War Target State: Italy Dates: 1947-1968 Tactics: Covert – Election influence, psychological warfare Type of Operation: Preventive Regime Replaced: Yes Examples of Primary Sources: • Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, September 15, 1951, “Analysis of the Power of the Communist Parties of France and Italy and of Measures to Counter Them,” CIA-FOIA, Doc. CIA-RDP80R01731R003200020013-5. • National Security Council, “National Security Council Report: Position of the United States with Respect to Italy in Light of the Possible Communist Participation in Government by Legal Means,” CIA-FOIA, Doc. CIA-RDP78-01617A003100010001-5 • Central Intelligence Agency, February 1948, “The Current Situation in Italy,” CIA-FOIA, Doc. 0000008669 • National Security Council, March 8, 1948, “National Security Council Report: Position of the United States with Respect to Italy in Light of the Possible Communist Participation in Government by Legal Means,” CIA-FOIA, Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational War in Syria: the Eisenhower Doctrine in the 21St Century?
    Transnational war in Syria: The Eisenhower Doctrine in the 21st Century? Paper for the Political Studies Association UK (PSA) Annual Conference 2016, Section ‘Turkey and Syria’, Hilton Meeting Room 4, Brighton, 21 March Jörg Michael Dostal Associate Professor Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University Republic of Korea [email protected] http://gspa.snu.ac.kr/node/76 and Senior Fellow Centre for Syrian Studies University of St. Andrews Introduction: The history of US geopolitical strategy in the Middle East How is it possible to define the geopolitical interests of the US in the Middle East? What kind of geopolitical strategy is used to enforce such interests? In order to identify intellectual fore- runners for the post-WW2 conduct of the US in the region, one needs to turn to geopolitical theorists broadly associated with the realist tradition in international relations. In this context, the writings of Dutch-born Yale University Professor Nicholas J. Spykman (1893-1943) de- serve particular attention. Spykman developed his views about future US strategy after an expected victory in WW2 against the background of earlier geopolitical theorists of sea power, namely Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840-1914), and of land power, namely Sir Halford Mackinder (1861-1947). In contrast to the former two authors, Spykman argued that US ‘security’ could no longer be guaranteed by focusing on regional defense, such as in concepts of a western hemisphere, or concerns with the relative dominance of either sea power or land power, such as in the relative geopolitical advantage of the US as the leading sea power or of Russia (be- tween 1924 and 1991 the Soviet Union) as the leading land power.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisenhower, Macmillan and the Problem of Nasser Anglo-American Relations and Arab Nationalism, 1955-59
    palgrave.com History : History of Britain and Ireland Ashton, N. Eisenhower, Macmillan and the Problem of Nasser Anglo-American Relations and Arab Nationalism, 1955-59 The years 1955-59 were a vital transitional period for the Anglo-American relationship in the Middle East. British and American leaders sought to protect cold war and oil interests in the region against the background of a renaissance of Arab nationalism personified by the Egyptian leader Nasser. With the aid of extensive declassified official documentation, this study traces the British and American responses to the Turco-Iraqi Pact of 1955, the Suez crisis, the Syrian crisis of 1957, the outbreak of civil strife in Lebanon, and the Iraqi Revolution of 1958. It shows how the differing priorities of the two powers in the region promoted a patchwork of confrontation and cooperation over Middle Eastern questions. For Britain, this study reveals that it was the Iraqi Revolution rather than Suez which led to a redefinition of strategy in the Palgrave Macmillan region, and a concentration on the defence of her oil interests in the Gulf. 1996, VIII, 273 p. 1st edition Order online at springer.com/booksellers Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH Customer Service Tiergartenstrasse 15-17 Printed book 69121 Heidelberg Hardcover Germany Printed book T: +49 (0)6221 345-4301 [email protected] Hardcover ISBN 978-0-333-64455-3 £ 119,99 | CHF 165,50 | 139,99 € | 153,99 € (A) | 149,79 € (D) Available Discount group Palgrave Monograph (P6) Product category Monograph Series Studies in Military and Strategic History Prices and other details are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Syrian Political Movements to United States Foreign Policy
    Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Projects Summer 8-9-2017 Proxy Conflict urnedT Civil Crisis: Understanding Syrian Political Movements to United States Foreign Policy Katherine Barymow Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone Part of the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Barymow, Katherine, "Proxy Conflict urnedT Civil Crisis: Understanding Syrian Political Movements to United States Foreign Policy" (2017). Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects. 992. https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/992 This Honors Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 © (Katherine Barymow 2017) 2 Abstract The Syrian crisis in terms of its crimes against humanity has surpassed most politicians’ wildest expectations: it seems that with every passing news cycle the west is informed of new atrocities commited against innocent Syrian civilians, in addition to violence perpetrated by Syrian Islamists themselves against westerners in ill-advised cries for help. The extent of bloodshed can be both horrifying and mystifying to the average American. How is it possible that the international community allows these crimes to proliferate and self-perpetuate in this modern day-in-age? Hearts sink with every image of a child in dire straights as a result of this man-made catastrophe, with more organizations donating to the Syrian plight than ever before; however, westerners to a very valid extent are starting to believe that they are throwing pennies down an endless abyss of despair and irrepaiable damage to the Syrian people, political system and urban fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational War in Syria: the Eisenhower Doctrine in the 21St Century?
    Transnational war in Syria: The Eisenhower Doctrine in the 21st Century? Paper for the Political Studies Association UK (PSA) Annual Conference 2016, Section ‘Turkey and Syria’, Hilton Meeting Room 4, Brighton, 21 March Jörg Michael Dostal Associate Professor Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University Republic of Korea [email protected] http://gspa.snu.ac.kr/new/sub3/sub_030101_24.jsp and Senior Fellow Centre for Syrian Studies University of St. Andrews Introduction: The history of US geopolitical strategy in the Middle East How is it possible to define the geopolitical interests of the US in the Middle East? What kind of geopolitical strategy is used to enforce such interests? In order to identify intellectual fore- runners for the post-WW2 conduct of the US in the region, one needs to turn to geopolitical theorists broadly associated with the realist tradition in international relations. In this context, the writings of Dutch-born Yale University Professor Nicholas J. Spykman (1893-1943) de- serve particular attention. Spykman developed his views about future US strategy after an expected victory in WW2 against the background of earlier geopolitical theorists of sea pow- er, namely Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840-1914), and of land power, namely Sir Halford Mac- kinder (1861-1947). In contrast to the former two authors, Spykman argued that US ‘security’ could no longer be guaranteed by focusing on regional defense, such as in concepts of a west- ern hemisphere, or concerns with the relative dominance of either sea power or land power, such as in the relative geopolitical advantage of the US as the leading sea power or of Russia (between 1924 and 1991 the Soviet Union) as the leading land power.
    [Show full text]
  • I: the GREEK COMMUNIST PARTY: RESISTANCE OR REVOLUTION? 1. for the Founding Charter of SEKE See KKE Episima Keimena, 1918-1924 (
    Notes I: THE GREEK COMMUNIST PARTY: RESISTANCE OR REVOLUTION? 1. For the Founding Charter of SEKE see KKE Episima Keimena, 1918-1924 (KKE Official Documents), vol. I (Athens, 1964) pp. 5-13. On the history of the Greek socialist movement see Kordatos, Y., Istoria tou Ellinikou Ergatikou Kinimatos (Athens, 1972); Benaroya, A., I Proti Stadiodromia tou Ellinikou Proletariatou (Athens, 1975); Moskof, K., I Ethniki kai Koinoniki Synidisi stin Ellada, 1830-1909 (Athens, 1973). With the notable exception of the book by Elefantis, A., I Epangelia tis Adynatis Epanastasis: KKE kai Astismos ston Mesopolomo (Athens, 1976), there has been no other scholarly study on the history of the KKE during the inter-war period. 2. For the text of the decision of the National Council see KKE Episima Kei1:nena, 1918-1924, op.cit., p. 31. 3. For the text of the decisions of the Second Congress see KKE Episima Keimena, 1918-1924, op.cit., pp. 61-2,68. 4. For the text of the resolution of the Third Extraordinary Congress see KKE Episima Keimena, 1918-1924, op.cit., p. -499. 5. KKE Episima Keimena, 1918-1924, op.cit., pp. 523-4, 534-42. See also Loulis, J. C., The Greek Communist Party, 1940-1944 (London, 1982) p.1. 6. KKE Episima Keimena, 1925-1928, vol. II (Athens, 1974) pp. 99, 101-2,105. 7. The results of the votes received by SEKE(K)/KKE in the elections held during the period 1923-9 were the following: 1923: 2.25 per cent; 1926: 3.6 per cent; 1928: 1.41 per cent; 1929: 1.70 per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syrian Crisis of 1957: a Lesson for the 21St Century
    The Syrian Crisis of 1957: A Lesson for the 21st Century Kevin Brown May 2013 Figueroa Press Los Angeles THE SYRIAN CRISIS OF 1957: A LESSON FOR THE 21st CENTURY Kevin Brown Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstore Copyright © 2013 all rights reserved Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book. Figueroa Press and the USC Bookstore are trademarks of the University of Southern California ISBN 13: 978-0-18-215697-9 ISBN 10: 0-18-215697-4 For general inquiries or to request additional copies of this paper please contact: USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School University of Southern California 3502 Watt Way, G4 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0281 Tel: (213) 821-2078; Fax: (213) 821-0774 [email protected] www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy CPD Perspectives is a periodic publication by the USC Center on Public Diplomacy, and highlights scholarship intended to stimulate critical thinking about the study and practice of public diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • “Flying in Middle East Oil” the Role of Middle Eastern Oil in Eisenhower’S ‘Containment’ Policy, 1953-60
    Master’s Degree in Comparative International Relations (Cross-Cultural Path) Final Thesis “Flying in Middle East Oil” The Role of Middle Eastern Oil in Eisenhower’s ‘Containment’ Policy, 1953-60 Supervisor Ch. Prof. Duccio Basosi Assistant supervisor Ch. Prof. Giovanni Favero Graduand Darya Paramonava Matricolation number 873038 Academic Year 2019 / 2020 “Flying in Middle East Oil” The Role of Middle Eastern Oil in Eisenhower’s ‘Containment’ Policy, 1953-60 “Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.” Dwight Eisenhower (quoting a statement from the war) Abstract Tema largamente inesplorato anche a livello accademico, la presente tesi si incentra sul ruolo del petrolio del Medio Oriente nella politica del containment di Eisenhower. In effetti, la carenza di studi specifici su questo argomento è particolarmente notevole se si considera l’importanza del coinvolgimento americano nella regione durante gli anni ’50 ed il fatto che le motivazioni che hanno portato a tale coinvolgimento rimangono in gran parte da chiarire. Il presente lavoro di ricerca si basa quindi sulla tesi secondo cui sarebbe impossibile comprendere la politica americana del containment durante la presidenza di Eisenhower senza la dovuta considerazione per gli interessi petroliferi in Medio Oriente. Per quanto riguarda la metodologia utilizzata, la tesi è basata su fonti sia primarie che secondarie. Le fonti primarie provengono principalmente, ma non interamente, dai documenti declassificati pubblicati sulle seguenti piattaforme: the Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) series; The American Presidency Project; The Cold War International History Project; the CIA Freedom of Information Act Electronic Reading Room. Le fonti secondarie includono una vasta gamma di volumi, articoli e documenti di lavoro, che discutono ogni aspetto specifico delineato nella tesi.
    [Show full text]
  • (2013): Perspectives on Terrorism
    Volume VII, Issue 6 December 2013 2013 PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 7, Issue 6 Table of Contents: Welcome from the Editors ......................................................................4 Announcement: Best PhD Tesis in the Field of (Counter-) Terrorism Studies Annual Award by the Terrorism Research Initiative .................6 Announcement: TRI/CTSS Vienna Conference .....................................8 I. Articles Media Metrics: How Arab and Western Media Construct Success and Failure in the ‘Global War on Terror’ ....................................................10 by Sarah V. Marsden Sri Lanka’s Post-Confict Strategy: Restorative Justice for Rebels and Rebuilding of Confict-affected Communities .....................................27 by Iromi Dharmawardhane Salaf Violence and Suf Tolerance? Rethinking Conventional Wisdom ...............................................................................................................58 by Mark Woodward, Muhammad Sani Umar, Inayah Rohmaniyah, and Mariani Yahya Simultaneous Attacks by Terrorist Organisations ................................79 by Kathleen Deloughery II. Policy Notes Al-Shabaab’s Somali Safe Havens: A Springboard for Terror ..............90 by Josh Meservey Rethinking International Counterterrorism Assistance to the Greater Horn of Africa: Toward a Regional Risk Reduction Strategy ............100 by Matthew Schwartz, Liat Shetret, and Alistair Millar III. Research Notes Research Note on the Energy Infrastructure Attack Database (EIAD) .............................................................................................................113
    [Show full text]
  • Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited
    CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited brings together representatives of multiple generations to create a rich examination The Establishment of Communist Regimes in East-Central Europe of the study and practice of Stalinism. While the articles are uniformly excellent, the book’s signal contribution is to bring recent research from Eastern European scholars to an English-speaking audience. Thus the volume is not just a “state of the discipline” collection, in which articles are collected to reflect that current situation of scholarship in a given field; instead, this one includes cutting edge scholarship that will prompt more of the same from other scholars in other fields/subfields. I would recommend this book highly to anyone interested in understanding the technology of Stalinism in both StalinismStalinism thought and practice. Nick Miller Boise State University The Sovietization of post-1945 East-Central Europe—marked by the forceful imposition of the Soviet- type society in the region—was a process of massive socio-political and cultural transformation. Despite its paramount importance for understanding the nature of the communist regime and its RevisitedRevisited legacy, the communist take-over in East Central European countries has remained largely under- researched. Two decades after the collapse of the communist system,Stalinism Revisited brings together a remarkable international team of established and younger scholars, engaging them in a critical re-evaluation of the institutionalization of communist regimes in East-Central Europe and of the period of “high Stalinism.” Sovietization is approached not as a fully pre-determined, homogeneous, and monolithic transformation, but as a set of trans-national, multifaceted, and inter-related processes of large-scale institutional and ideological transfers, made up of multiple “takeovers” in various fields.
    [Show full text]