DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 Hawaii County Community Health Needs Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 Hawaii County Community Health Needs Assessment Hawaii County Community Health Needs Assessment — November 2015 — Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................... vi Introduction ....................................................................................................... vi Summary of Findings ......................................................................................... vi Selected Priority Areas .................................................................................... viii 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Summary of CHNA Report Objectives and Context ...................................... 1 1.1.1 Healthcare Association of Hawaii ........................................................... 1 1.1.2 Member Hospitals ................................................................................. 1 1.1.3 Advisory Committee ............................................................................... 1 1.1.4 Consultants ........................................................................................... 3 1.2 About the Hospital ...................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Hospital Community Benefit Team and Goals ....................................... 4 1.2.2 Definition of Community + Map ........................................................... 4 2 Selected Priority Areas ...................................................................................... 5 3 Evaluation of Progress since Prior CHNA ......................................................... 6 3.1 Impact since Prior CHNA ............................................................................ 6 3.2 Community Feedback on Prior CHNA or Implementation Strategy ............ 6 4 Methods ............................................................................................................ 7 4.1 Quantitative Data Sources and Analysis ....................................................... 7 4.1.1 Race/Ethnicity Disparities .................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Preventable Hospitalization Rates ........................................................ 8 4.1.3 Shortage Area Maps ............................................................................. 8 4.1.4 External Data Reports .......................................................................... 8 4.2 Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis .................................................... 8 4.3 Prioritization ............................................................................................. 9 4.4 Data Considerations ................................................................................... 9 5 Demographics ................................................................................................. 11 5.1 Population ................................................................................................. 11 5.1.1 Age ....................................................................................................... 11 5.1.2 Racial/Ethnic Diversity ........................................................................ 12 5.2 Social and Economic Determinants of Health ........................................... 14 5.2.1 Income ................................................................................................ 14 5.2.2 Poverty ................................................................................................ 14 5.2.3 Education ............................................................................................ 14 5.2.4 SocioNeeds Index® .............................................................................. 15 6 Findings .......................................................................................................... 16 Note to the Reader ............................................................................................. 19 6.1 Access to Care ............................................................................................ 21 6.1.1 Access to Health Services ..................................................................... 21 6.1.2 Mental Health ...................................................................................... 23 i 6.1.3 Oral Health ......................................................................................... 24 6.1.4 Economy ............................................................................................. 25 6.1.5 Transportation .................................................................................... 25 6.2 Chronic Diseases ....................................................................................... 27 6.2.1 Exercise, Nutrition & Weight ............................................................... 27 6.2.2 Diabetes and Kidney Disease ............................................................. 28 6.2.3 Heart Disease & Stroke ...................................................................... 29 6.2.4 Arthritis ............................................................................................. 30 6.2.5 Cancer ................................................................................................ 30 6.3 Environmental Health & Respiratory Diseases .......................................... 32 6.3.1 Environment ....................................................................................... 32 6.3.2 Respiratory Diseases ........................................................................... 32 6.4 Mental Health & Health Risk Behaviors ................................................... 34 6.4.1 Mental Health & Mental Disorders ..................................................... 34 6.4.2 Substance Abuse ................................................................................. 35 6.4.3 Wellness & Lifestyle ............................................................................ 37 6.4.4 Prevention & Safety ............................................................................ 37 6.4.5 Immunizations & Infectious Diseases ................................................ 39 6.5 Women’s, Infant, & Reproductive Health ................................................. 40 6.5.1 Maternal, Fetal, & Infant Health ......................................................... 40 6.5.2 Family Planning and Teen Sexual Health ............................................ 41 6.5.3 Women’s Health ................................................................................. 42 7 A Closer Look at Highly Impacted Populations ............................................... 43 7.1 Children, Teens, & Adolescents ................................................................. 43 7.1.1 Access to Care ..................................................................................... 43 7.1.2 Oral Health ......................................................................................... 43 7.1.3 Disabilities .......................................................................................... 43 7.1.4 Nutrition & Physical Activity ............................................................... 44 7.1.5 Asthma ............................................................................................... 44 7.1.6 Mental Health & Substance Abuse ...................................................... 44 7.1.7 Prevention and Safety ......................................................................... 44 7.1.8 Teen Pregnancy and Sexual Health ..................................................... 44 7.2 Older Adults ............................................................................................. 44 7.2.1 Access to Care ..................................................................................... 44 7.2.2 Chronic Diseases ................................................................................. 45 7.2.3 Safety .................................................................................................. 45 7.2.4 Social Environment ............................................................................. 45 7.3 Low-Income Population ........................................................................... 46 7.4 Rural Communities .................................................................................. 46 7.5 People with Disabilities ............................................................................. 47 7.6 Homeless Population................................................................................. 47 7.7 People from Micronesian Regions ............................................................ 48 7.8 Disparities by Race/Ethnic Groups ........................................................... 49 8 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 52 ii iii Tables Table 5.1: Population Density and Change ................................................................................ 11 Table 6.1: Secondary Data Scoring for Health Topic Areas ....................................................... 18 Table 6.2: Secondary Data Scoring for Quality of Life Topic Areas ............................................ 18 Table 6.3: Providers per 100,000 Residents ............................................................................... 21 Table 6.4: Adult Oral Health .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Employment of Women in the Pineapple Canneries of Hawaii
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BULLETIN OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU, NO. 82 THE EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN IN THE PINEAPPLE CANNERIES OF HAWAII Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis [Public—No. 259—66th Congress] [H. K. 13229] An Act To establish in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the Women’s Bureau Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there shall be established in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the Women’s Bureau. Sec. 2. That the said bureau shall be in charge of a director, a woman, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, who shall receive an annual compensation of $5,000. It shall be the duty of said bureau to formulate standards and policies which shall promote the welfare of wage-earning women, improve their working conditions, increase their efficiency, and ad­ vance their opportunities for profitable employment. The said bureau shall have authority to investigate and report to the said de­ partment upon all matters pertaining to the welfare of women in industry. The director of said bureau may from time to time pub­ lish the results of these investigations in such a manner and to such extent as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe. Sec. 3. That there shall be in said bureau an assistant director, to be appointed by the Secretary of Labor, who shall receive an annual compensation of $3,500 and shall perform such duties as shall be prescribed by the director and approved by the Secretary of Labor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Profile of Samoans in the United States. Part I: Demography; Part II: Social and Economic Characteristics; Appendix: Language Use Among Samoans
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 264 331 UD 024 599 AUTHOR Hayes, Ge'ffrey; Levin, Michael J. TITLE A Statistical Profile of Samoans in the United States. Part I: Demography; Part II: Social and Economic Characteristics; Appendix: Language Use among Samoans. Evidence from the 1980 Census. INSTITUTION Northwest Regional Educational Lab., Portland, Oreg. SPONS AGENCY Employment and Training Administration (DOL), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Dec 83 CONTRACT 99-3-r946-75-075-01 NOTE 117p.; A paper commissioned for a Study of Toverty, Unemployment and Training Needs of American Samoans. For related documents, see UD 024 599-603. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Birth Rate; Census Figures; *Demography; *Educational Attainment; *Employment Level; Family Characteristics; Income; *Language Proficiency; Migr.tion Patterns; Population Growth; Poverty; *Samoan Americans; *Socioeconomic Status IDENTIFIERS California; Census 1980; Hawaii; *Samoans; Washington ABSTRACT This paper provides a broad overview of the demographic, social, and economic characteristics of Samoans in the United States, focusing particularly on the Samoan populations of Hawaii, California, and Washington, where 85% of Samoans reside. The data is derived from the "race" question on the 1980 Census and other local statistical materials. Demographically, the population is found to be highly urbanized, young (average age 19.5 years) and with a high fertility rate (averaging 4.3 children per adult woman). The total U.S. Samoan population projected for the year 2000 is most realistically estimated at 131,000. Among the three States, Hawaii's Samoans are youngest, with a higher dependency ratio and lower sex ratio than elsewhere in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwendolyn Mink Oral History Interview Final Edited Transcript
    Gwendolyn Mink Daughter of the Honorable Patsy Takemoto Mink of Hawaii Oral History Interview Final Edited Transcript March 14, 2016 Office of the Historian U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. “Well, I think that every little thing—or maybe not so little thing—that the women in Congress dared to speak about, whether it was, you know, not having gym access in the 1960s, or insisting that Anita Hill be heard in 1991, to insisting that certain kinds of women’s issues get a full hearing—I think all of those things have been part of the story of women in Congress, and part of my mother’s story of being a woman in Congress. I think that what she took from her service was a constant reminder to herself of how important it is that women serve in Congress. Because one woman can’t accomplish what 218 women could, right? And so her goal was parity for women, for the whole full range of women’s voices. I think she hoped that the legacy of being the first woman of color, and being a woman who was willing to talk about women, you know, that that would be part of what she would leave to the future.” Gwendolyn Mink March 14, 2016 Table of Contents Interview Abstract i Interviewee Biography i Editing Practices ii Citation Information ii Interviewer Biography iii Interview 1 Notes 40 Abstract In this interview, Gwendolyn Mink reflects on the life and career of her mother, the late Congresswoman Patsy Takemoto Mink of Hawaii, the first woman of color and the first Asian- American woman to serve in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of COVID-19 on Women in Hawaii and the Asia-Pacific
    will have the greatest impact on single parents, most of whom are women. In Hawaii, 43 per cent of low- income households and 20 per cent of above low- income households are headed by a single parent. Even in households with two parents, mounting THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON childcare demands are likely to take a greater toll on WOMEN IN HAWAII AND women, who spend more time looking after children ASIA-PACIFIC than men. In the US, women spend on average four hours per day performing unpaid labor which includes BY JENNIFER HOWE childcare, shopping and housework, while men spend just two and a half hours. American women are also Jennifer Howe, MA (University of Durham, UK) is a eight times more likely to manage their children’s research intern at Pacific Forum. schedules than their male counterparts. In Asia and the Pacific, women undertake four times more unpaid Introduction care work than men. The unequal division of labor illustrated by these figures suggests that women, as Women’s voices are missing from Hawaii’s Covid-19 the primary caregivers, will more readily leave their economic response and recovery plan while the jobs if work arrangements cannot be adjusted to pandemic exacerbates existing inequalities that hinder accommodate childcare. Moreover, because women female empowerment. The coronavirus crisis is are typically paid less than men, there is more negatively affecting women’s economic participation incentive for the female partner to quit. Some women and empowerment, has led to greater rates of gender- have also reported feeling pressured to leave their jobs based violence, and has disrupted access to sexual and to care for children in order to be considered “good reproductive health.
    [Show full text]
  • Women of Color Health Data Book
    Ethnic and Racial Heritage women of color. Between 2000 and 2010, Hispanic women increased to 44 percent of all women of color, Of the nearly 309 million people living in the United while black non-Hispanic women decreased to States (according to the U.S. census conducted on 35 percent. April 1, 2010), more than half (157 million or 50.8 According to projections by the U.S. Census percent) were women. More than 56 million—more Bureau, the U.S. population will become more racially than a third (36.1 percent)—were women of color. and ethnically diverse by the middle of the 21st These 56.7 million women of color were distributed century. In 2043, the United States is projected to as follows: 44 percent Hispanic, 35 percent black become a majority-minority nation for the first time. (non-Hispanic), nearly 14 percent Asian (non- While the white non-Hispanic population will remain Hispanic), 2.0 percent American Indian and Alaska the largest single group, no group will make up a Native (non-Hispanic), and 0.4 percent Native Hawai- majority. The white non-Hispanic population is ian and Other Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic). An projected to peak in 2024, at nearly 200 million, and additional 5 percent of women of color identified then slowly decrease to 186 million in 2050, when they themselves as belonging to two or more races. In will account for 46.6 percent of the total population.3 raw numbers, there are nearly 25 million Hispanic Meanwhile, people of color are expected to total women, nearly 20 million black (non-Hispanic) women, more than 213 million in 2050, when they will more than 7 million Asian (non-Hispanic) women, account for 53.4 percent of the total population.
    [Show full text]
  • Paths to Leadership of Native Hawaiian Women Administrators In
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, Educational Administration, Department of and Student Research Spring 5-2016 Paths to Leadership of Native Hawaiian Women Administrators in Hawaii's Higher Education System: A Qualitative Study Farrah-Marie Gomes University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, and the Higher Education Administration Commons Gomes, Farrah-Marie, "Paths to Leadership of Native Hawaiian Women Administrators in Hawaii's Higher Education System: A Qualitative Study" (2016). Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research. 266. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss/266 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational Administration, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. PATHS TO LEADERSHIP OF NATIVE HAWAIIAN WOMEN ADMINISTRATORS IN HAWAII’S HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM: A QUALITATIVE STUDY by Farrah-Marie Kawailani Gomes A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Educational Studies (Educational Leadership
    [Show full text]
  • Dehumanization of the Black American Female: an American/Hawaiian Experience
    Spaces for Difference: An Interdisciplinary Journal Volume 1, Number 1, pp. 65-85 Dehumanization of the Black American Female: An American/Hawaiian Experience KIMETTA R. HAIRSTON Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg ABSTraCT The dehumanization of Blackness and its effects on Black females are rooted in the harsh history of slavery in America. Attributes such as race and gender impact their life and educational experiences. Examining the historical implications of dehumanization through the lens of Critical Race and Black Radical Feminist Theories provides a foundation for understanding issues surrounding gender, race, and identities of black females in society. This article uses data from 72 Black female students in Hawaii along with the author’s personal experiences to investigate the implications of being Black and female in Hawaiian society. Slavery, the most obvious example of the dehumanization of Black people, left a legacy of unequal treatment. For the purposes of this paper, dehumanization is defined as the process of depriving a person of human qualities, attributes and rights such as individuality, compassion, or civility (Feagan, 2001; Maiese, 2003). This is a process by which members of a group of people assert the inferiority of another group through subtle or overt acts or statements and may be directed by an organization (such as a state) or may be the composite of individual sentiments and actions. As such, dehumanization is a psychological process of making some people seem less than human or not worthy of humane treatment; dehumanization serves to morally exclude individuals from the norms of society. Maiese (2003) explains that ideology, skin color, and cognitive capacity are often criteria for exclusion and those who choose to dehumanize others tend to perceive them as a threat to their well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • HAUMEA: Transforming the Health of Native Hawaiian Women and Empowering Wāhine Well-Being
    HAUMEA Transforming the Health of Native Hawaiian Women and Empowering Wāhine Well-Being Haumea —Transforming the Health of Native Hawaiian Women and Empowering Wāhine Well-Being. Copyright © 2018. Office of Hawaiian Affairs. All Rights Reserved. No part of the this report may be reproduced or transmitted in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. Suggested Citation: Office of Hawaiian Affairs (2018). Haumea—Transforming the Health of Native Hawaiian Women and Empowering Wāhine Well-Being. Honolulu, HI: Office of Hawaiian Affairs. For the electronic book and additional resources please visit: www.oha.org/wahinehealth Office of Hawaiian Affairs 560 North Nimitz Highway, Suite 200 Honolulu, HI 96817 Design by Stacey Leong Design Printed in the United States HAUMEA: Transforming the Health of Native Hawaiian Women and Empowering Wāhine Well-Being Table of Contents PART 1 List of Figures. 1 Introduction and Methodology . 4 Chapter 1: Mental and Emotional Wellness. .11 Chapter 2: Physical Health . 28 Chapter 3: Motherhood. 47 PART 2 Chapter 4: Incarceration and Intimate Partner Violence . 68 Chapter 5: Economic Well-Being . 87 Chapter 6: Leadership and Civic Engagement . .108 Summary . 118 References. .120 Acknowledgments. .128 LIST OF FIGURES Introduction and Methodology i.1 ‘Ōlelo Hawai‘i (Hawaiian Language) Terms related to Wāhine . 6 i.2 Native Hawaiian Population Totals . 8 Chapter 1: Mental and Emotional Wellness 1.1 Phases and Risk Behaviors in ‘Ōpio. 16 1.2 Middle School Eating Disorder Behavior (30 Days) By Gender (2003, 2005) . .17 1.3 High School Eating Disorder Behavior (30 Days) By Gender (2009–2013) .
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FLOOR NEW YORK
    1 VANESSA L. WILLIAMS, ESQ. LAW OFFICE OF VANESSA L. WILLIAMS, P.C. 2 414 WEST SOLEDAD AVENUE GCIC BLDG., SUITE 500 HAGÅTÑA, GUAM 96910 3 TELEPHONE: (671) 477-1389 EMAIL: [email protected] 4 ALEXA KOLBI-MOLINAS* 5 MEAGAN BURROWS* RACHEL REEVES* MERICAN IVIL IBERTIES NION OUNDATION 6 A C L U F 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10004 7 TEL: (212) 549-2633 EMAIL: [email protected] 8 * Application for admission pro hac vice pending 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GUAM 11 SHANDHINI RAIDOO, et al., ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. 21-00009 12 ) Plaintiffs, ) ) 13 vs. ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A 14 ) LEEVIN TAITANO CAMACHO, et al., ) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Case 1:21-cv-00009 Document 13 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 41 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii 3 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 4 I. STATUTORY BACKGROUND........................................................................................ 2 5 II. FACTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 6 A. Background on Abortion Safety and Access ................................................................ 4 7 B. Medication Abortion and Telemedicine ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chuukese Migrant Women in Guam: Perceptions of Barriers to Health Care
    Hattori-Uchima: Chuukese Migrant Women in Guam: Perceptions of Barriers to Health Care Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal Chuukese Migrant Women in Guam: Volume 1(3): 19-28 ©Author(s) 2017 Perceptions of Barriers to Health Care http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/apin/ Margaret Hattori-Uchimaa Abstract This descriptive qualitative study examined perceived barriers to health care among Chuukese migrant women in Guam and explored which factors influenced health-seeking behaviors. Study participants recommended interventions which may reduce those perceived barriers. Since the Compact of Free Association with the United States was enacted in 1985, there has been a dramatic rise in the numbers of Chuukese migrating to Guam. This migration is anticipated to continue with more migrants needing health care, education, and social services. Little is known about their perceptions of barriers to health care services or the cultural, social, economic, and other factors that influence their health-seeking behaviors. Focus group interviews provided rich data, which were analyzed using content analysis. Themes included barriers to seeking and maintaining health and social and cultural factors influencing health-seeking behaviors. Major barriers identified were financial issues, difficulty in obtaining care due to long wait times, transportation problems, and struggles with both language and cultural nuances of communication. It was found that the women identified a mistrust of health and social services resulting from communication barriers. Social and cultural factors included the use of traditional Chuukese medicines, lack of preventive care services, confidentiality concerns, and feelings of mis- treatment. Participants made recommendations for improved care and expressed a strong desire to achieve the mutual goal of better health care for Chuukese migrants in Guam.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer in Guam and Hawaii a Comparison of Two U.S. Island
    Cancer Epidemiology 50 (2017) 199–206 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cancer Epidemiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/canep Cancer in Guam and Hawaii: A comparison of two U.S. Island populations MARK ⁎ Brenda Y. Hernandeza, , Renata A. Bordallob, Michael D. Greena, Robert L. Haddockc a Hawaii Tumor Registry, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 701 Ilalo St., Honolulu, HI 96813, USA b Guam Cancer Registry, Cancer Research Center of Guam, University of Guam, House #7, Dean Circle, UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam 96923, USA c Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services, Office of Epidemiology and Research, Mangilao, Guam 96923, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Background: Cancer disparities within and across populations provide insight into the influence of lifestyle, Guam environment, and genetic factors on cancer risk. Hawaii Methods: Guam cancer incidence and mortality were compared to that of Hawaii using data from their respective Chamorro population-based, central cancer registries. Native Hawaiian Results: In 2009–2013, overall cancer incidence was substantially lower in Guam than in Hawaii for both sexes Cancer while overall cancer mortality was higher for Guam males. Cervical cancer incidence and prostate cancer Incidence Mortality mortality were higher in Guam. Both incidence and mortality were higher among Guam men for cancers of the lung & bronchus, liver & intrahepatic bile duct, and nasopharynx; Chamorro men were disproportionately af- fected by these cancers. Filipinos and Whites in Guam had lower overall cancer incidence compared to Filipinos and Whites in Hawaii. Although breast cancer incidence was significantly lower in Guam compared to Hawaii, women in Guam presented at younger ages and with rarer disease histologies such as inflammatory carcinoma were more prevalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer in Guam and Hawaii: a Comparison of Two U.S. Island Populations
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CDC Stacks HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Cancer Manuscript Author Epidemiol. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 October 01. Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 October ; 50(Pt B): 199–206. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2017.08.005. Cancer in Guam and Hawaii: A Comparison of Two U.S. Island Populations Brenda Y. Hernandez, PhD, MPHa,*, Renata A. Bordallo, MSW, CTRb, Michael D. Green, CTRa, and Robert L. Haddock, DVM, MPHc aHawaii Tumor Registry, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 701 Ilalo St. Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813 USA bGuam Cancer Registry, Cancer Research Center of Guam, University of Guam, House #7, Dean Circle, UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam, 96923 USA cGuam Department of Public Health and Social Services, Office of Epidemiology and Research, Mangilao, Guam, 96923 USA Abstract Background—Cancer disparities within and across populations provide insight into the influence of lifestyle, environment, and genetic factors on cancer risk. Methods—Guam cancer incidence and mortality were compared to that of Hawaii using data from their respective population-based, central cancer registries. Results—In 2009-2013, overall cancer incidence was substantially lower in Guam than in Hawaii for both sexes while overall cancer mortality was higher for Guam males. Cervical cancer incidence and prostate cancer mortality were higher in Guam. Both incidence and mortality were higher among Guam men for cancers of the lung & bronchus, liver & intrahepatic bile duct, and nasopharynx; Chamorro men were disproportionately affected by these cancers.
    [Show full text]