DOCSLIB.ORG

[email protected] 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FLOOR NEW YORK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vlw@Vlwilliamslaw.Com 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FLOOR NEW YORK 1 VANESSA L. WILLIAMS, ESQ. LAW OFFICE OF VANESSA L. WILLIAMS, P.C. 2 414 WEST SOLEDAD AVENUE GCIC BLDG., SUITE 500 HAGÅTÑA, GUAM 96910 3 TELEPHONE: (671) 477-1389 EMAIL: [email protected] 4 ALEXA KOLBI-MOLINAS* 5 MEAGAN BURROWS* RACHEL REEVES* MERICAN IVIL IBERTIES NION OUNDATION 6 A C L U F 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10004 7 TEL: (212) 549-2633 EMAIL: [email protected] 8 * Application for admission pro hac vice pending 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GUAM 11 SHANDHINI RAIDOO, et al., ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. 21-00009 12 ) Plaintiffs, ) ) 13 vs. ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A 14 ) LEEVIN TAITANO CAMACHO, et al., ) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Case 1:21-cv-00009 Document 13 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 41 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii 3 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 4 I. STATUTORY BACKGROUND........................................................................................ 2 5 II. FACTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 6 A. Background on Abortion Safety and Access ................................................................ 4 7 B. Medication Abortion and Telemedicine ....................................................................... 7 8 C. Abortion Access in Guam ........................................................................................... 12 9 D. Telemedicine Abortion in Guam ................................................................................ 14 10 ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................ 16 11 I. Plaintiffs Are Likely to Succeed on Their Claim That the Clinic Requirement Is 12 Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied to Medication Abortion. ....................................... 16 13 II. Plaintiffs Are Likely to Succeed on Their Claim That the Clinic Requirement and 14 State-Mandated Information Law Violate Plaintiffs’ Patients’ Rights to Substantive 15 Due Process. ...................................................................................................................... 21 16 A. Clinic Requirement ..................................................................................................... 25 17 B. State-Mandated Information Law ............................................................................... 27 18 III. Plaintiffs and Their Patients Will Suffer Irreparable Harm Absent Injunctive Relief. ..... 32 19 IV. The Balance of Equities Strongly Favors Plaintiffs and the Public Interest Is Served 20 by An Injunction. .............................................................................................................. 33 21 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 34 22 23 24 Raidoo v. Camacho Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction i Case 1:21-cv-00009 Document 13 Filed 02/05/21 Page 2 of 41 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2 Cases 3 All. for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 4 632 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2011) ................................................................................................... 16 5 Ariz. Dream Act Coal. v. Brewer, 6 757 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2014) ............................................................................................. 32, 33 7 Cardenas v. United States, 8 826 F.3d 1164 (9th Cir. 2016) ................................................................................................... 23 9 Doe v. Bolton, 10 410 U.S. 179 (1973) ................................................................................................................... 22 11 Elrod v. Burns, 12 427 U.S. 347 (1976) ................................................................................................................... 32 13 EMW Women’s Surgical Ctr., P.S.C. v. Friedlander, 14 978 F.3d 418 (6th Cir. 2020) ..................................................................................................... 23 15 Farris v. Seabrook, 16 677 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2012) ..................................................................................................... 16 17 Forbes v. Napolitano, 18 236 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2000) ............................................................................................. 17, 20 19 Grayned v. City of Rockford, 20 408 U.S. 104 (1972) ................................................................................................................... 17 21 Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians & Gynecologists v. Ada, 22 962 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1992) ................................................................................................... 21 23 Harris v. Bd. of Supervisors, 24 366 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2004) ..................................................................................................... 33 Raidoo v. Camacho Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction ii Case 1:21-cv-00009 Document 13 Filed 02/05/21 Page 3 of 41 1 Hopkins v. Jegley, 2 968 F.3d 912 (8th Cir. 2020) ..................................................................................................... 23 3 Isaacson v. Horne, 4 716 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2013) ............................................................................................. 21, 25 5 Jackson Women’s Health Org. v. Currier, 6 760 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2014) ..................................................................................................... 26 7 Jackson Women’s Health Org. v. Dobbs, 8 945 F.3d 265 (5th Cir. 2019) ..................................................................................................... 22 9 June Medical Servs., LLC v. Russo, 10 140 S. Ct. 2103 (2020) ............................................................................................. 22, 23, 25, 26 11 Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 12 136 F.3d 1055 (6th Cir. 1998) ................................................................................................... 33 13 Karlin v. Foust, 14 188 F.3d 446 (7th Cir. 1999) ..................................................................................................... 27 15 Little Rock Fam. Plan. Servs. v. Rutledge, 16 398 F. Supp. 3d 330 (E.D. Ark. 2019) ....................................................................................... 22 17 McCormack v. Herzog, 18 788 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2015) ............................................................................................. 17, 20 19 Melendres v. Arpaio, 20 695 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2012) ............................................................................................... 32, 34 21 Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 22 305 U.S. 337 (1938) ................................................................................................................... 25 23 Ne. Fla. Chapter of Associated Gen. Contractors v. City of Jacksonville, 24 896 F.2d 1283 (11th Cir. 1990) ................................................................................................. 32 Raidoo v. Camacho Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction iii Case 1:21-cv-00009 Document 13 Filed 02/05/21 Page 4 of 41 1 Nelson v. Nat’l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 2 530 F.3d 865 (9th Cir. 2008) ..................................................................................................... 32 3 Planned Parenthood Ariz., Inc. v. Humble, 4 753 F.3d 905 (9th Cir. 2014) .............................................................................................. passim 5 Planned Parenthood Minn., N.D., S.D. v. Daugaard, 6 799 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (D.S.D. 2011) ......................................................................................... 29 7 Planned Parenthood of Cent. & N. Ariz. v. Arizona, 8 718 F.2d 938 (9th Cir.1983) ...................................................................................................... 19 9 Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. Casey, 10 505 U.S. 833 (1992) ............................................................................................................ passim 11 Planned Parenthood of Wis., Inc. v. Schimel, 12 806 F.3d 908 (7th Cir. 2015) ..................................................................................................... 25 13 Planned Parenthood Se., Inc. v. Bentley, 14 951 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (M.D. Ala. 2013) .................................................................................... 33 15 Planned Parenthood Se., Inc. v. Strange, 16 9 F. Supp. 3d 1272 (M.D. Ala. 2014) ........................................................................................ 29 17 Planned Parenthood Se., Inc. v. Strange, 18 33 F. Supp. 3d 1330 (M.D. Ala. 2014)………………………………………………………... 29 19 Rodriguez v. Robbins, 20 715 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2013) ................................................................................................... 33 21 Roe v. Wade, 22 410 U.S. 113 (1973) ................................................................................................................... 21 23 Steffel v. Thompson, 24 415 U.S. 452 (1974) ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Employment of Women in the Pineapple Canneries of Hawaii
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BULLETIN OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU, NO. 82 THE EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN IN THE PINEAPPLE CANNERIES OF HAWAII Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis [Public—No. 259—66th Congress] [H. K. 13229] An Act To establish in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the Women’s Bureau Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there shall be established in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the Women’s Bureau. Sec. 2. That the said bureau shall be in charge of a director, a woman, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, who shall receive an annual compensation of $5,000. It shall be the duty of said bureau to formulate standards and policies which shall promote the welfare of wage-earning women, improve their working conditions, increase their efficiency, and ad­ vance their opportunities for profitable employment. The said bureau shall have authority to investigate and report to the said de­ partment upon all matters pertaining to the welfare of women in industry. The director of said bureau may from time to time pub­ lish the results of these investigations in such a manner and to such extent as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe. Sec. 3. That there shall be in said bureau an assistant director, to be appointed by the Secretary of Labor, who shall receive an annual compensation of $3,500 and shall perform such duties as shall be prescribed by the director and approved by the Secretary of Labor.
    [Show full text]
  • A CASE for LEGAL ABORTION WATCH the Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina
    HUMAN RIGHTS A CASE FOR LEGAL ABORTION WATCH The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina A Case for Legal Abortion The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina Copyright © 2020 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-8462 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2020 ISBN: 978-1-62313-8462 A Case for Legal Abortion The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 8 To the President of Argentina: .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech
    Boston College Law Review Volume 62 Issue 6 Article 8 6-29-2021 The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech J. Aidan Lang Boston College Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Litigation Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation J. A. Lang, The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech, 62 B.C. L. Rev. 2091 (2021), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol62/iss6/8 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT: ABORTION AND COMPELLED PHYSICIAN SPEECH Abstract: Across the country, courts have confronted the question of whether laws requiring physicians to display ultrasound images of fetuses and describe the human features violate the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. On April 5, 2019, in EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C. v. Beshear, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit joined the Fifth Circuit and upheld Ken- tucky’s law, thus rejecting a physician’s free speech challenge. The Supreme Court declined to review this decision without providing an explanation. The Sixth Circuit became the third federal appellate court to rule on such regulations, often referred to as “ultrasound narration laws” or “display and describe laws,” and joined the Fifth Circuit in upholding such a law against a First Amendment challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortions Date Ordered 920 Cherry S.E
    ORDER FORM black folders palm cards bumper stickers speaker •s forms . calendar label "Take A Stand" tabloid canvassing form T -shirts donation envelopes Why Michigan should vote "Yes for Life" brochure instruction sheet yard signs name tags Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Address _____________________________________________________________________ City/Zip _____________________________________________________________ Phone II -------------------------------- For office use only: MAIL TO: Committee to End Tax-Funded Abortions Date ordered 920 Cherry S.E. Date needed -------- Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Date mailed ------ [or call CHRISTOPHER ALFARO (616) 451-0601] Phone order received by--------- LIFESAVER T-SHIRT ORDER FORM CONFERENCE SPECIAL!!! Please Print Organization__________________ _ Contact person ------------------ Phone: ....:.,__---!,.( )____ _ Address __-=~----~-----~--~~~=-~~----~~~--=~=-~ (Please, no rural route numbers for UPS delivery purposes) Zip Code __ s Number of T-shirts (adult sizes): -- M --L -- X-L 2 T-shirts for $3.00 - $------" • Total Mail to: Committee to End Tax-Funded Abortions 920 Cherry, S.E. Grand Rapids, MI 49 506 Attention: Peggy Campbell - 90S6t IW 'sp!d~ pue.J~ ·:rs ':J33.QS A.u31J:J Ol6 suop.:mqv p3pun:~-xe.t pu3: o:J 33:J:J!WWO:J SUO!pOq\( papUn::I·XO! PU3 "V, UC uS8A, &10.1\ Thank You PAID FOR BY: The CommiHee to End Tax ~ Funded Abortions • 920 Cherry Street, S.E., Grand Rapids, Ml 49506 • (616) 451·0601 WE MUST PROTECT OUR NEW LAW! Together, we passed a new law, Public Act 59, which technically put an end to tax­ funded abortion in Michigan. Pro-abortion forces in our state, however, are trying to repeal P.A. 59 through a referendum vote next November. We must protect our new law! Your donation will be used to help win a referendum vote on tax-funded abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: an Argument for Financial Abortion Narline Casimir
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-1-2013 The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: An Argument for Financial Abortion Narline Casimir Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Recommended Citation Casimir, Narline, "The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: An Argument for Financial Abortion" (2013). Law School Student Scholarship. 193. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/193 THE RIGHT TO AN ABORTION AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION: AN ARGUMENT FOR FINANCIAL ABORTION Narline Casimir Introduction Gender biases and discrimination have created conditions where women were and in some instances are still considered the lesser of the two sexes. The issue of gender inequality is global. World news reports relates stories of women who are not given the same privileges as men.1 Certain cultures have assigned roles to women and they risk punishment or ostracism if they dare to step outside of the bounds that were created for them.2 Here, in the United States, women have come a long way with the right to vote and the opportunity to get an education alongside men. However, women still face instances of gender inequality regarding the issues of equal pay and equal treatment.3 However, there is one area in which women have the upper hand. That area is reproductive freedom through abortion. In Roe v. Wade4, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of a woman’s right to choose to obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus.5 The Court gave deference to the effects of pregnancy on a woman and ignored the effects of abortion on men.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Profile of Samoans in the United States. Part I: Demography; Part II: Social and Economic Characteristics; Appendix: Language Use Among Samoans
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 264 331 UD 024 599 AUTHOR Hayes, Ge'ffrey; Levin, Michael J. TITLE A Statistical Profile of Samoans in the United States. Part I: Demography; Part II: Social and Economic Characteristics; Appendix: Language Use among Samoans. Evidence from the 1980 Census. INSTITUTION Northwest Regional Educational Lab., Portland, Oreg. SPONS AGENCY Employment and Training Administration (DOL), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Dec 83 CONTRACT 99-3-r946-75-075-01 NOTE 117p.; A paper commissioned for a Study of Toverty, Unemployment and Training Needs of American Samoans. For related documents, see UD 024 599-603. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Birth Rate; Census Figures; *Demography; *Educational Attainment; *Employment Level; Family Characteristics; Income; *Language Proficiency; Migr.tion Patterns; Population Growth; Poverty; *Samoan Americans; *Socioeconomic Status IDENTIFIERS California; Census 1980; Hawaii; *Samoans; Washington ABSTRACT This paper provides a broad overview of the demographic, social, and economic characteristics of Samoans in the United States, focusing particularly on the Samoan populations of Hawaii, California, and Washington, where 85% of Samoans reside. The data is derived from the "race" question on the 1980 Census and other local statistical materials. Demographically, the population is found to be highly urbanized, young (average age 19.5 years) and with a high fertility rate (averaging 4.3 children per adult woman). The total U.S. Samoan population projected for the year 2000 is most realistically estimated at 131,000. Among the three States, Hawaii's Samoans are youngest, with a higher dependency ratio and lower sex ratio than elsewhere in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwendolyn Mink Oral History Interview Final Edited Transcript
    Gwendolyn Mink Daughter of the Honorable Patsy Takemoto Mink of Hawaii Oral History Interview Final Edited Transcript March 14, 2016 Office of the Historian U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. “Well, I think that every little thing—or maybe not so little thing—that the women in Congress dared to speak about, whether it was, you know, not having gym access in the 1960s, or insisting that Anita Hill be heard in 1991, to insisting that certain kinds of women’s issues get a full hearing—I think all of those things have been part of the story of women in Congress, and part of my mother’s story of being a woman in Congress. I think that what she took from her service was a constant reminder to herself of how important it is that women serve in Congress. Because one woman can’t accomplish what 218 women could, right? And so her goal was parity for women, for the whole full range of women’s voices. I think she hoped that the legacy of being the first woman of color, and being a woman who was willing to talk about women, you know, that that would be part of what she would leave to the future.” Gwendolyn Mink March 14, 2016 Table of Contents Interview Abstract i Interviewee Biography i Editing Practices ii Citation Information ii Interviewer Biography iii Interview 1 Notes 40 Abstract In this interview, Gwendolyn Mink reflects on the life and career of her mother, the late Congresswoman Patsy Takemoto Mink of Hawaii, the first woman of color and the first Asian- American woman to serve in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of COVID-19 on Women in Hawaii and the Asia-Pacific
    will have the greatest impact on single parents, most of whom are women. In Hawaii, 43 per cent of low- income households and 20 per cent of above low- income households are headed by a single parent. Even in households with two parents, mounting THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON childcare demands are likely to take a greater toll on WOMEN IN HAWAII AND women, who spend more time looking after children ASIA-PACIFIC than men. In the US, women spend on average four hours per day performing unpaid labor which includes BY JENNIFER HOWE childcare, shopping and housework, while men spend just two and a half hours. American women are also Jennifer Howe, MA (University of Durham, UK) is a eight times more likely to manage their children’s research intern at Pacific Forum. schedules than their male counterparts. In Asia and the Pacific, women undertake four times more unpaid Introduction care work than men. The unequal division of labor illustrated by these figures suggests that women, as Women’s voices are missing from Hawaii’s Covid-19 the primary caregivers, will more readily leave their economic response and recovery plan while the jobs if work arrangements cannot be adjusted to pandemic exacerbates existing inequalities that hinder accommodate childcare. Moreover, because women female empowerment. The coronavirus crisis is are typically paid less than men, there is more negatively affecting women’s economic participation incentive for the female partner to quit. Some women and empowerment, has led to greater rates of gender- have also reported feeling pressured to leave their jobs based violence, and has disrupted access to sexual and to care for children in order to be considered “good reproductive health.
    [Show full text]
  • Women of Color Health Data Book
    Ethnic and Racial Heritage women of color. Between 2000 and 2010, Hispanic women increased to 44 percent of all women of color, Of the nearly 309 million people living in the United while black non-Hispanic women decreased to States (according to the U.S. census conducted on 35 percent. April 1, 2010), more than half (157 million or 50.8 According to projections by the U.S. Census percent) were women. More than 56 million—more Bureau, the U.S. population will become more racially than a third (36.1 percent)—were women of color. and ethnically diverse by the middle of the 21st These 56.7 million women of color were distributed century. In 2043, the United States is projected to as follows: 44 percent Hispanic, 35 percent black become a majority-minority nation for the first time. (non-Hispanic), nearly 14 percent Asian (non- While the white non-Hispanic population will remain Hispanic), 2.0 percent American Indian and Alaska the largest single group, no group will make up a Native (non-Hispanic), and 0.4 percent Native Hawai- majority. The white non-Hispanic population is ian and Other Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic). An projected to peak in 2024, at nearly 200 million, and additional 5 percent of women of color identified then slowly decrease to 186 million in 2050, when they themselves as belonging to two or more races. In will account for 46.6 percent of the total population.3 raw numbers, there are nearly 25 million Hispanic Meanwhile, people of color are expected to total women, nearly 20 million black (non-Hispanic) women, more than 213 million in 2050, when they will more than 7 million Asian (non-Hispanic) women, account for 53.4 percent of the total population.
    [Show full text]
  • Paths to Leadership of Native Hawaiian Women Administrators In
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, Educational Administration, Department of and Student Research Spring 5-2016 Paths to Leadership of Native Hawaiian Women Administrators in Hawaii's Higher Education System: A Qualitative Study Farrah-Marie Gomes University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, and the Higher Education Administration Commons Gomes, Farrah-Marie, "Paths to Leadership of Native Hawaiian Women Administrators in Hawaii's Higher Education System: A Qualitative Study" (2016). Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research. 266. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss/266 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational Administration, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. PATHS TO LEADERSHIP OF NATIVE HAWAIIAN WOMEN ADMINISTRATORS IN HAWAII’S HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM: A QUALITATIVE STUDY by Farrah-Marie Kawailani Gomes A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Educational Studies (Educational Leadership
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of RU-486 in the United States
    The Story of RU-486 in the United States The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation The Story of RU-486 in the United States (2001 Third Year Paper) Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8889480 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE BIRTH OF A CONTROVERSY 2 A. Background: What is RU-486 and How Does It Work? 2 B. The French Abortion Pill Fury 3 II. POLITICS AND CHEMISTRY MAKE A VOLATILE MIXTURE: \KEEPING THE ABORTION PILL BOTTLED UP IN FRANCE" 7 A. Moral Concerns 7 A. Moral Concerns 7 B. Corporate America's Lack of Interest 8 B. Corporate America's Lack of Interest 8 C. Supreme Court Jurisprudence's Impact on RU-486 10 D. Abortion Politics Goes Conservative 13 E. Regulatory Restrictions on Abortion 13 III. THE ABORTION TIDE BEGINS TO TURN 17 A. A New Administration 17 B. The Involvement of the Population Council 19 C. Concern From the Pro-Life Movement 22 1 IV. THE TIDE TURNS AGAIN { The Political Pendulum Swings to the Right 25 A. The Politics of Abortion Run Into The Contract With America 25 B. Conservative Congressional Legislation 27 V. THE FDA APPROVAL PROCESS GETS UNDERWAY 29 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibraltar Command Paper on Abortion British Pregnancy Advisory Service Response
    Gibraltar Command Paper on Abortion British Pregnancy Advisory Service Response The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) is a British reproductive healthcare charity that offers abortion care, contraception, STI testing, and pregnancy counselling to nearly 80,000 women each year via our clinics in Great Britain. We also treat women from Northern Ireland, Ireland, and Europe where their domestic laws prevent them accessing the care they need. As part of our advocacy work to enable the women we treat to get the best possible care, we campaign for the decriminalisation of abortion. We do not believe there are circumstances where it is ever appropriate to imprison a woman for making a decision about her own pregnancy Proposals BPAS welcomes this Command Paper and the desire to ensure that abortion law in Gibraltar is in line with human rights legislation. Based on our experience providing abortion care under the Abortion Act 1967 from which this proposal is transcribed, we have a number of proposals, produced in support of the proposals of local pro-choice groups, to ensure that international standards are met and women in Gibraltar are better able to access the care they need. These proposed changes would see the creation of abortion legislation similar to that of Ireland, the Isle of Man, France, and other European nations. Decriminalisation of women. There is no place in law for the continued criminalisation of women seeking to end their own pregnancies. It is out of step with most of Europe, with the USA, Canada, multiple states in America, and – most notably – with the new legislation being brought forward in Ireland.
    [Show full text]