DOCSLIB.ORG

Abortions Date Ordered 920 Cherry S.E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abortions Date Ordered 920 Cherry S.E ORDER FORM black folders palm cards bumper stickers speaker •s forms . calendar label "Take A Stand" tabloid canvassing form T -shirts donation envelopes Why Michigan should vote "Yes for Life" brochure instruction sheet yard signs name tags Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Address _____________________________________________________________________ City/Zip _____________________________________________________________ Phone II -------------------------------- For office use only: MAIL TO: Committee to End Tax-Funded Abortions Date ordered 920 Cherry S.E. Date needed -------- Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Date mailed ------ [or call CHRISTOPHER ALFARO (616) 451-0601] Phone order received by--------- LIFESAVER T-SHIRT ORDER FORM CONFERENCE SPECIAL!!! Please Print Organization__________________ _ Contact person ------------------ Phone: ....:.,__---!,.( )____ _ Address __-=~----~-----~--~~~=-~~----~~~--=~=-~ (Please, no rural route numbers for UPS delivery purposes) Zip Code __ s Number of T-shirts (adult sizes): -- M --L -- X-L 2 T-shirts for $3.00 - $------" • Total Mail to: Committee to End Tax-Funded Abortions 920 Cherry, S.E. Grand Rapids, MI 49 506 Attention: Peggy Campbell - 90S6t IW 'sp!d~ pue.J~ ·:rs ':J33.QS A.u31J:J Ol6 suop.:mqv p3pun:~-xe.t pu3: o:J 33:J:J!WWO:J SUO!pOq\( papUn::I·XO! PU3 "V, UC uS8A, &10.1\ Thank You PAID FOR BY: The CommiHee to End Tax ~ Funded Abortions • 920 Cherry Street, S.E., Grand Rapids, Ml 49506 • (616) 451·0601 WE MUST PROTECT OUR NEW LAW! Together, we passed a new law, Public Act 59, which technically put an end to tax­ funded abortion in Michigan. Pro-abortion forces in our state, however, are trying to repeal P.A. 59 through a referendum vote next November. We must protect our new law! Your donation will be used to help win a referendum vote on tax-funded abortion. Please respond generously! .-------------------- IMPORTANT---------------------~ • Gifts of more than $20 must be by check or money order. • A name, address, and phone number must accompany your gift . • Corporations are eligible to make contributions to this effort. • Gifts and payments to the Committee to End Tax Funded Abortions are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes. Enclosed is my (our) gift of: 0 $250 0 $100 D $70 D $35 D Other $ ---- Nrune ____________________________________________________ Address -------------------------------------------------- City-------------- State _____ Zip ____ Phone: Home Office -------------------- My pledge is marked above, please bill me. D I (we) would like to commit to this amount on a monthly basis. D Please make your gift payable to: COMMITIEE TO END TAX-FUNDED ABORTIONS CAMPAIGN COMMENTS Vote "Yes" on "A!" End Tax-Funded Abortions News from The Committee to End Tax-Funded Abortions September 1988 Welcome to the second edition of Campaign Comments. Once again, we say "Thanks" for all of your help and we welcome your comments. 50,000 "LIFESAVERS ROLLING YOUR WAY! The 6th annual Lifesaver drive is scheduled for September Lifesavers" from Ri ht to Life affiliates and 2 000 local to participate. Our goal is to distribute 150,000 rolls of Lifesavers and raise 250,000 for the campaign. To get involved, contact your local RTL affiliate or call Peggy Campbell at the Grand Rapids Office (616) 451-0601. WOULD YOU BELIEVE? In 1985, one abortionist performed 3,448 Medicaid abortions! Assuming that this person worked five days a week and never took a vacation, this abortionist must have averaged 13.25 abortions per day! By comparison, the hospital that perform·ed the most abortions in 1985 only performed 2,656! BIG DIPPERS The same abortionist mentioned above received 453 440.80 in state tax dollars for these abortions. Together, seven other abortionists billed the taxpayer 1.73 million for abortions that they per­ formed just in 1985. DOUBLE DIPPERS The National Right to Life News reports that approximately 83% of the nations abortions are performed in cllinics, and it has been estimated that 30 - 50% of these clinics are tax exempt. That is, they\ ar/ not required to pay federal income taxes because they are considered to be in the same .gt!eg6ry as traditional churches and charities. · PRO-CHOICE? Perhaps it was figures such as the ones above which prompted nationally syndicated columnist, Joseph Sobran to say, "This fall Michigan will hold a referendum on whether to continue the state funding of abortion. The anti-abortion forces are conducting an excellent campaign so far. My only advice to them is to keep using the word "abortionist" as often as possible. This personalizes the issue in just the right way: "Should the taxpayer be forced to pay the abortionist?" How can anyone say yes to that and still pretend to be "pro-choice"? CALLING ALL COMMUNICATIONS COORDINA TORS The Media Relations Guidelines are now complete and are. being distributed to all of the Local Communications Coordinators. The Guidelines contain tips on how to work with the local press, fill-in-the-blank press releases, guidelines for writing letters to the editor and other helpful information. If you are a Local Communications Coordinator and have not received your guidelines yet, or if you want to learn more about becoming a Local Communications Coordinator, contact your local affiliate or the state-level Communications Coor_dinator for your area: Southeast West Michigan/ Mid Michigan/ Michigan Upper Peninsula Northern Michigan Mashawn Blaylock Tim Beals John Wilson (313) 344-9595 (616) 451-0601 (517) 487-3376 Paid tor by.- The Committee To End Tax- Funded Abortions 920 Cherry S.E. • Grand Rapids, Ml 49506 TIM BEALS SPREADS THE WORD Tim Beals, the state-level Communications Coordinator for West Michigan and the Upper Penin­ sula, is writing the campaign's other newsletter entitled "Spread the Word". This newsletter is for religious leaders. Its purpose is to let them know what other religious leaders are doing on the campaign and give them ideas on how they can get involved. The first edition is already out and subsequent editions are due out soon. Tim has about 4,000 churches on his mailing list already, but if you know of someone who should be receiving this newsletter, give Tim a call at the Grand Rapids Office. FIELD WORK ALMOST DONE- BUMPER CROP REPORTED The summer canvass is now over 95% complete and the_ results have been very positive. For instance, among those contacted, 50% want yard signs, almost half want postcards that they can send to friends encouraging them to vote "YES", about 20% are willing to do additional canvassing and literature drops and 8 - 10% want absentee ballots. Our thanks and congratulations to the 22,000 faithful supporters who made this possible. Now that the summer canvass is completed our field people will be moving into Phase II which includes precinct organization, GO-Day, putting up yard signs, sending out absentee ballots, and Get-Out-The Vote efforts. IF YOU'VE GOT THE MONEY, WE'VE GOT THE TIME Do you know of potential major donors - someone who could contribute $500 or more to the campaign? If you _do, please· contact the Finance Coordinator in your area. Southeast Michigan West Michigan Kay Wambley Mark Blocher ( 616) 451 .. 0601 Gloria Klein (313) 344-9595 Central Michigan Northern Michigan Ed Rivet (517) 487-3376 Bob Bucholtz (517) 773-9772 THERE ARE ONLY 60 MORE DAYS UNTll.. THE ELECTION!!!!! respon~e to proponef1ts of rape & 1ncest exceptions 1. Assertion: Abortion should be available to victims of rape. Response: a. Rape victims need support and compassion from family, friends and the community in general. (1) "It would be impossible to overstate the importance of psychological support from a woman's family and friends. There is a great need to assure that, no matter what the circumstances of conception, there should never be any embarrassment about bringing a child into the world. There is also a great need to assure the woman (and her family and friends) that crime is not hereditary and that, in fact, rape is one of the rare instances in which good can come from evil." (Mary Meehan, "Facing the Hard Cases," Human Ufe Review (Summer, '83), p. 21.) (2) Abortion does not mitigate the trauma of rape; it only compounds it with the trauma of abortion. A study done at the University of British Columbia's Department of Psychiatry, as reported in the March 3, 1978 issue of Psychiatric News, a publication of the American Psychiatric Association, demonstrated ttiat abortion often exacerbates a woman's psychological stress. That study conclud­ ed in part: "Whatever may be the case at the conscious level, at a much deeper level, abortion is regarded by many women as infanticide." b. Abortion is not an act of compassion, but of violence. (1) "Honesty requires us to say that it is unjust that a ·woman carry to term a child conceived through rape, but that it is a far greater injustice to kill the child. This is a rare situation in which injustice cannot be avoided; the best that can be done is to reduce it. The first injustice lasts for nine months of a life that can be relieved, both psychologically and financially. The second injustice ends a life, and there is no remedy for that." (Meehan, "Facing the Hard Cases," p. 21). (2) "The child is innocent, and should not be punished for the father's crime. Rapists are no longer executed in our country, their children, the totally innocent result of the crime, should not be ex­ ecuted in their place." (Meehan, "Facing the Hard Cases," p. 21.) (3) "Rape is an act of aggression or violence, not of sex or lust. Is not the harm of the unborn child the intent of the abortion procedure, one which is also an act of violence? Do not the acts of rape and abortion both hold views of human beings which make objects of them? When a woman exercises her right to control her own body in total disregard of the body of another human being, it is called abortion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feminist Periodicals
    The Un vers ty of W scons n System Feminist Periodicals A current listing of contents WOMEN'S STUDIES Volume 24, Number 3, Fall 2004 Published by Phyllis Holman Weisbard LIBRARIAN Women's Studies Librarian Feminist Periodicals A current listing of contents Volume 24, Number 3 (Fall 2004) Periodical literature is the cutting edge ofwomen's scholarship, feminist theory, and much ofwomen's culture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing of Contents is published by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing pUblic awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminist Periodicals will serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' familiarity with a wide spectrum of feminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a reader wish to subscribe to a journal or to obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary loan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations of the new copyright law With regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Table ofcontents pages from current issues ofmajor feministjournals are reproduced in each issue ofFeminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing of all journals we have selected. As pUblication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of FP. The annotated listing provides the following information on each journal: 1. Year of first publication. 2. Frequency of pUblication. 3. U.S. subscription price(s). 4. Subscription address. 5. Current editor.
    [Show full text]
  • A CASE for LEGAL ABORTION WATCH the Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina
    HUMAN RIGHTS A CASE FOR LEGAL ABORTION WATCH The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina A Case for Legal Abortion The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina Copyright © 2020 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-8462 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2020 ISBN: 978-1-62313-8462 A Case for Legal Abortion The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 8 To the President of Argentina: .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech
    Boston College Law Review Volume 62 Issue 6 Article 8 6-29-2021 The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech J. Aidan Lang Boston College Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Litigation Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation J. A. Lang, The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech, 62 B.C. L. Rev. 2091 (2021), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol62/iss6/8 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT: ABORTION AND COMPELLED PHYSICIAN SPEECH Abstract: Across the country, courts have confronted the question of whether laws requiring physicians to display ultrasound images of fetuses and describe the human features violate the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. On April 5, 2019, in EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C. v. Beshear, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit joined the Fifth Circuit and upheld Ken- tucky’s law, thus rejecting a physician’s free speech challenge. The Supreme Court declined to review this decision without providing an explanation. The Sixth Circuit became the third federal appellate court to rule on such regulations, often referred to as “ultrasound narration laws” or “display and describe laws,” and joined the Fifth Circuit in upholding such a law against a First Amendment challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles Abortion: a Woman's Private Choice
    CHEMERINSKY(GOODWIN).TOWESTLAWV2 (DO NOT DELETE) 5/11/2017 5:19 PM Articles Abortion: A Woman’s Private Choice Erwin Chemerinsky* & Michele Goodwin** INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1189 I. THE FLAWED FOUNDATION FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ......................................... 1198 A. Griswold v. Connecticut ........................................................ 1201 B. Roe v. Wade .......................................................................... 1203 C. The Undue Burden Test ........................................................ 1213 II. RECONCEPTUALIZING ABORTION AS A PRIVATE CHOICE FOR EACH WOMAN ............................................................................................ 1224 A. The Constitutional Issues Concerning Abortion ................... 1224 B. Abortion as a Private Choice ................................................ 1230 III. THE IMPLICATIONS OF SEEING ABORTION AS A PRIVATE CHOICE FOR EACH WOMAN ........................................................................... 1237 A. Restoring Strict Scrutiny: The Government Cannot Favor Childbirth Over Abortion ...................................................... 1237 B. Reconsidering the Abortion-Funding Decisions ................... 1238 C. Informed Consent Laws and Waiting Periods ...................... 1245 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................... 1246 Introduction Abortion rights
    [Show full text]
  • Editor's Message
    6 Osteopathic Family Physician (2014)4, 6-7 Osteopathic Family Physician, Volume 6, No. 4, July/August 2014 Editor’s Message Control Issue Merideth C. Norris, DO, FACOFP Editor, Osteopathic Family Physician In the early 1900’s, the only reliable method of avoiding of a barrier, and the concern that this would lead to female pregnancy was abstinence. There were no safe commercial promiscuity without consequence. Whether for or against, to alternatives, and very little access to education on the subject. call the Pill “revolutionary” would not be an overstatement. Then in 1916, a nurse named Margaret Sanger opened a clinic in New York, the purpose of which was to educate women Although I do not know of any clinician who longs for the days about family planning. Although she was initially arrested for of restricted reproductive choice, I know of many a clinician promoting the then-radical idea that women might want to who would admit that at least when there were only one or two choose whether or not to become pregnant, she continued her hormonal contraceptives, it was a lot easier to tell them apart. mission upon her release. She founded the American Birth My friends who have done international work universally Control League, which later became Planned Parenthood.1 describe how jarring it is to return from a developing nation and enter an American supermarket: the sheer volume of Although Ms. Sanger’s encouragement of women to make options is dizzying. It would seem that the range of options reproductive choices gained grudging acceptance in some for those who wish to manipulate their reproductive cycle arenas, birth control was not legally accessible in all states is similarly imposing.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramapo Journal of Law and Society Fall 2020 Edition
    Volume V, Number 1 Fall0 2020 Ramapo Journal of Law and Society Vol. V Fall 2020 Number 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL ARTICLES Why Women Should Make the Abortion Decision: Damned if you do, Damned if you don’t ……………………………………………………………………………….4 Christina San Fillipo, Ramapo College of New Jersey Creating Terrorists: Issues with Counterterrorism Tactics and the Entrapment Defense ……………………………………………………………………………….40 Carissa Prevratil California State University, Long Beach Transitional Justice: The Key to Democracy, Development, and Sustainable Peace within Transitioning Societies in Latin America ……………………………………………………………………………….58 Brianna Weissman, Ramapo College of New Jersey Fear of the Other Race: Decades of Institutional Racism, Unfair Legislation, and Hatred ……………………………………………………………………………….86 Jake Luppino, Ramapo College of New Jersey PERSPECTIVES Sexual Harassment on College Campuses: The Insufficiency of Title IX ……………………………………………………………………………… 121 Taylor Puluse, Ramapo College of New Jersey 1 Mission The Ramapo Journal of Law and Society is an interdisciplinary, online journal devoted to the publication of undergraduate scholarship in Law and Society. The Journal’s mission is to provide a platform to undergraduate students from across disciplines to engage with socio-legal issues in the context of the liberal arts. We understand law and society broadly to include discussions of law in society not just as rigid bodies of rules but as dynamic institutions shaped by historical forces and social imperatives. The journal will include submissions from varied fields of the social sciences and humanities, and hopes to build conversations across disciplines on the topical socio- legal issues of our times. The journal is published by an editorial board of students and faculty representing the Ramapo College undergraduate program in Law and Society, in collaboration with our colleagues at other colleges and universities nationwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: an Argument for Financial Abortion Narline Casimir
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-1-2013 The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: An Argument for Financial Abortion Narline Casimir Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Recommended Citation Casimir, Narline, "The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: An Argument for Financial Abortion" (2013). Law School Student Scholarship. 193. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/193 THE RIGHT TO AN ABORTION AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION: AN ARGUMENT FOR FINANCIAL ABORTION Narline Casimir Introduction Gender biases and discrimination have created conditions where women were and in some instances are still considered the lesser of the two sexes. The issue of gender inequality is global. World news reports relates stories of women who are not given the same privileges as men.1 Certain cultures have assigned roles to women and they risk punishment or ostracism if they dare to step outside of the bounds that were created for them.2 Here, in the United States, women have come a long way with the right to vote and the opportunity to get an education alongside men. However, women still face instances of gender inequality regarding the issues of equal pay and equal treatment.3 However, there is one area in which women have the upper hand. That area is reproductive freedom through abortion. In Roe v. Wade4, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of a woman’s right to choose to obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus.5 The Court gave deference to the effects of pregnancy on a woman and ignored the effects of abortion on men.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of RU-486 in the United States
    The Story of RU-486 in the United States The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation The Story of RU-486 in the United States (2001 Third Year Paper) Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8889480 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE BIRTH OF A CONTROVERSY 2 A. Background: What is RU-486 and How Does It Work? 2 B. The French Abortion Pill Fury 3 II. POLITICS AND CHEMISTRY MAKE A VOLATILE MIXTURE: \KEEPING THE ABORTION PILL BOTTLED UP IN FRANCE" 7 A. Moral Concerns 7 A. Moral Concerns 7 B. Corporate America's Lack of Interest 8 B. Corporate America's Lack of Interest 8 C. Supreme Court Jurisprudence's Impact on RU-486 10 D. Abortion Politics Goes Conservative 13 E. Regulatory Restrictions on Abortion 13 III. THE ABORTION TIDE BEGINS TO TURN 17 A. A New Administration 17 B. The Involvement of the Population Council 19 C. Concern From the Pro-Life Movement 22 1 IV. THE TIDE TURNS AGAIN { The Political Pendulum Swings to the Right 25 A. The Politics of Abortion Run Into The Contract With America 25 B. Conservative Congressional Legislation 27 V. THE FDA APPROVAL PROCESS GETS UNDERWAY 29 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibraltar Command Paper on Abortion British Pregnancy Advisory Service Response
    Gibraltar Command Paper on Abortion British Pregnancy Advisory Service Response The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) is a British reproductive healthcare charity that offers abortion care, contraception, STI testing, and pregnancy counselling to nearly 80,000 women each year via our clinics in Great Britain. We also treat women from Northern Ireland, Ireland, and Europe where their domestic laws prevent them accessing the care they need. As part of our advocacy work to enable the women we treat to get the best possible care, we campaign for the decriminalisation of abortion. We do not believe there are circumstances where it is ever appropriate to imprison a woman for making a decision about her own pregnancy Proposals BPAS welcomes this Command Paper and the desire to ensure that abortion law in Gibraltar is in line with human rights legislation. Based on our experience providing abortion care under the Abortion Act 1967 from which this proposal is transcribed, we have a number of proposals, produced in support of the proposals of local pro-choice groups, to ensure that international standards are met and women in Gibraltar are better able to access the care they need. These proposed changes would see the creation of abortion legislation similar to that of Ireland, the Isle of Man, France, and other European nations. Decriminalisation of women. There is no place in law for the continued criminalisation of women seeking to end their own pregnancies. It is out of step with most of Europe, with the USA, Canada, multiple states in America, and – most notably – with the new legislation being brought forward in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Administration's Decision to Defund the United Nations Population Fund and Its Implications for Women in Developing Nations
    Recent Developments The Bush Administration's Decision to Defund the United Nations Population Fund and Its Implications for Women in Developing Nations Rachel Farkast I. INTRODUCTION In May 2002, due to continuing pressure to investigate the United Nations Population Fund's (UNFPA) alleged support of Chinese forced abortion and in- voluntary sterilization practices, the Bush administration sent an independent as- sessment team to evaluate the UNFPA's family planning programs in China.' Although the team concluded that the UNFPA has not "knowingly supported or participated in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization in the PRC [People's Republic of China], 2 the Bush administration nevertheless relied on a little-known statutory provision under The Foreign Op- erations, Export Financing and Related Programs Appropriations Act to cut $34 Copyright © 2003, The Regents of the University of California. t. J.D. Candidate, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley. 1. S.REP. No. 107-219, at 54 (2002). 2. Press Release, U.S. Dep't of State, Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, Report of the China UNFPA Independent Assessment Team (May 29, 2002), at http://www.state.gov/ g/prm/rls/rpt/2002/12122pf.htm (last visited Jan. 29, 2003) [hereinafter Assessment Team Report]. BERKELEY WOMEN'S LAW JOURNAL BERKELEY WOMEN'S LAW JOURNAL million in funding that Congress had appropriated to the UNFPA.3 This recent development piece evaluates the policies behind the Bush ad- ministration's decision to cut the UNFPA's funding and illustrates that these policies fail to justify the cutting of funds intended for organizations such as the UNFPA, which are dedicated to helping developing countries address reproduc- tive health and population issues that are crucially important today.
    [Show full text]
  • College Student's Poetry Anthology
    Editorial Comments To Tell We Support The Truth Bill Baird Aside from a few freshman students with a genuine concern and a high degree of involve­ by STEVE DICKINSON tacks on people not of the Catholic faith by these ment, it is impossible to find the Corning Com­ people, all in the name of God, of course. I call Bill Baird’s visit to Corning Community Col­ munity College freshman class. Either they have this hypocritical. It is a little difficult to see the all been swept away by some scheming sopho­ lege made many of us take a long hard look at real world through a stained glass window, isn’t more or they are suffering an acute case of apa- many of the issues we have been confronted with it? thia. Since there is no known cure for this dread­ in the past decade, namely abortion laws, con­ ful disease, we must all work together to find a Mr. Baird returns to court next month to traception, morality, morality and the law, and fight again for the rights of all of us. If he wins, suitable antidote. we win. If he loses, only he is punished by im­ The 1970-71 academic year has reached the religion. Mr. Baird can be labeled by some as a prisonment. Mr. Baird needs your help, if only three-quarter mark and still the class of '71 has crusader for the rights of women to choose to by a letter to the clinic. The address is: the load of organizing the bulk of campus activi­ have the number of children they wish to have.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FLOOR NEW YORK
    1 VANESSA L. WILLIAMS, ESQ. LAW OFFICE OF VANESSA L. WILLIAMS, P.C. 2 414 WEST SOLEDAD AVENUE GCIC BLDG., SUITE 500 HAGÅTÑA, GUAM 96910 3 TELEPHONE: (671) 477-1389 EMAIL: [email protected] 4 ALEXA KOLBI-MOLINAS* 5 MEAGAN BURROWS* RACHEL REEVES* MERICAN IVIL IBERTIES NION OUNDATION 6 A C L U F 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10004 7 TEL: (212) 549-2633 EMAIL: [email protected] 8 * Application for admission pro hac vice pending 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GUAM 11 SHANDHINI RAIDOO, et al., ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. 21-00009 12 ) Plaintiffs, ) ) 13 vs. ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A 14 ) LEEVIN TAITANO CAMACHO, et al., ) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Case 1:21-cv-00009 Document 13 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 41 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii 3 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 4 I. STATUTORY BACKGROUND........................................................................................ 2 5 II. FACTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 6 A. Background on Abortion Safety and Access ................................................................ 4 7 B. Medication Abortion and Telemedicine ......................................................................
    [Show full text]